Weltraumbote - No 62-63 - 1961

Magazine Overview

Title: WELTRAUMBOTE
Issue: Nr. 62/63
Volume: 6. Jahrgang
Date: Mai/Juni 1961
Publisher: UFO-Verlag Zürich
Country: Switzerland
Language: German
Price: Fr. 1.60

UFO über Russland bei Marsopposition!

The cover story details a photograph taken on November 21, 1959, by Soviet polar explorer J. Muraschow at the polar station «Stolb» in Tixi, Russia. This image, published on January 8 by Komsomolskaja Prawda, the central organ of the communist youth, along with the newspaper «Prawda», attempted to dismiss the numerous recent UFO observations in the USSR with standard academic explanations. The article notes that similar, almost identical apparatuses have been seen in the free world, citing an example from issue Nr. 22/23 showing objects over the Armco Steel Corporation in Hamilton, Ohio. The author argues that the Soviet authorities' explanations are unconvincing, questioning why light refractions would lead so many people across different countries to describe solid objects with hatches and ejectors, and why such objects have appeared on radar. The article concludes that these official statements have definitively disproven the theory of a Russian origin for UFOs, as no country would publicly display its secret weapons in such a manner. The photo featured is likely the one mentioned in the second paragraph of the editorial in the previous issue. Its publication was made possible after considerable difficulties, thanks to the Schweizerisches Ostinstitut in Bern.

Subscription Information and Editorial Stance

Page 2 provides subscription details for 6 months, with prices for Switzerland, Austria, and other countries. It also lists the German representative, Hermann Schulz. The magazine appeals for reader contributions of observation reports, stating that while no payment can be offered, they welcome newspaper clippings, requesting the source, place of publication, and date. The editorial stance is described as objective and critical, aiming for truthfulness. It emphasizes that reader support is crucial, whether through providing addresses, recruiting subscribers, purchasing issues, or contributing financially, to aid NICAP's work. The magazine clarifies that contributors are responsible for their own articles, and the opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the editor's views. However, accurate translation and reproduction of eyewitness accounts and reports are guaranteed.

The New Smear Campaign - A Boomerang!

This section, starting on page 3, discusses a smear campaign initiated by the US Air Force in December to prevent congressional investigations into UFOs. The campaign, led by Air Force spokesman Lt. Col. Lawrence J. Tacker, has reportedly backfired, targeting the Air Force and Tacker himself. Tacker admitted on a national radio show that his goal was to discredit NICAP and its director. The article suggests that NICAP is seen as a major threat to the Air Force's secrecy policy, particularly regarding documentary evidence submitted to Congress. Following Tacker's appearance on the Dave Garroway television show, he, the Air Force, and NICAP received extensive mail. The article details how Tacker's ridicule of a confidential NICAP report to Congress as "the biggest nonsense" was met with criticism. This report contained crucial documents about UFO existence and the conclusions of NICAP's board and technical advisors, prompting concerned congressmen to seek explanations from the Air Force.

The Air Force's campaign, involving numerous radio shows and press interviews by Tacker, and his recent book "Die Fliegenden Untertassen und die Luftwaffe" (Flying Saucers and the Air Force), is presented as the official Air Force stance. The article claims that Tacker's book largely consists of previous assertions, denials, and explanations, and that at least nine points in it contradict documented facts. The article outlines the Air Force's strategy of denial and ridicule, as observed in nationwide press and radio interviews monitored by Air Force censorship officers.

Specific points of denial by Tacker are listed and refuted:
1. Tacker denied that Congress members were ever denied information by the Air Force, which is contradicted by signed statements from House Majority Leader John McCormack and Representatives Joseph E. Karth, Gordon H. Scherer, and others.
2. The Air Force spokesman denied that UFO news is withheld from the public, which is contradicted by Air Force Regulation Nr. 200-2 (prohibiting discussion of UFOs with unauthorized persons), a statement by Major Dewey Fournet (former head of the secrecy group), and an assertion by Capt. E. J. Ruppelt (former head of the Air Force UFO commission) that he was often ordered not to discuss cases classified as unknown.
3. Tacker denied that any reputable astronomer had reported personal UFO observations. This is countered by reports from Dr. Clyde Tombaugh (discoverer of Pluto), Director Robert Johnson of the Adler Planetarium, Australian government astronomers, and other professional and private astronomers.
4. Tacker's denial or evasion of documented facts led to untrue statements. The article refers to the well-known Washington sightings and other significant events like the Mantell, Red Bluff, and Nike cases.
5. Tacker branded any criticism of Air Force methods as "malicious, senseless, absolutely untrue." Those who publicly criticized the Air Force's policy included Vice Admiral Hillenkoetter, Colonel Joseph Bryan, Ex-Senator Flanders, Colonel Emerson, Admiral Fahrney, Lt. Col. McAshan, Dr. Kaeburn, J. B. Hartranft, Rear Admiral Knowles, Professor Maney, Pastor Albert Baller, Air Force Colonel Freeman, and hundreds of other citizens. The full list is available from NICAP.
6. Tacker repeatedly mocked NICAP and its fight for congressional hearings, calling the UFO phenomenon a "romantic delusion of the public" promoted by "attention-seeking UFO clubs." He avoided discussing cases like the tragic UFO hunt in 1953, where an F-89 jet and two Air Force officers disappeared.

The Garroway Broadcast

This section details the importance of the Air Force spokesman's attacks, which were disseminated through the press and radio. The Air Force's engagement in this confrontation is seen as an effort to convince the press and public that NICAP's objections are false, thereby alleviating pressure from demands for congressional investigations. The Garroway broadcast, aired on December 15, 1960, initially scheduled for 13 minutes, was extended twice due to an overwhelming number of calls to the National Broadcasting Company (NBC). Dave Garroway ultimately dedicated the entire second half of his show to the interview. The following excerpts from the taped discussion illustrate the Air Force representative's stance.

During the interview, Garroway questioned Tacker about the Air Force's official book on UFOs. Tacker stated the book was written because he felt the Air Force was being "trampled on" by NICAP and other groups, and that the Air Force was wrongly accused of withholding information. When Garroway suggested Tacker's statement that the Air Force doesn't withhold information was not proof, Tacker insisted he could prove it and that no information had been withheld. Keyhoe challenged this, mentioning cases NICAP had that the Air Force had kept secret. Tacker dismissed NICAP as a "fan club." Keyhoe then listed prominent individuals associated with NICAP, including former intelligence chiefs and high-ranking military officers, to which Tacker responded, "You impress me greatly, Major." Keyhoe further stated that NICAP had sent a confidential report to Congress, and that despite Tacker's book claiming all congressmen were satisfied with Air Force answers, Representative McCormick stated that a congressional commission had tried to obtain information without success, and that several members were convinced of the existence of unexplained objects. Representative Joseph Karth reportedly stated the Air Force refused to provide information, citing security reasons.

Tacker denied this, stating the Air Force never used national security as an excuse. When Keyhoe asked if Tacker would call Representative Karth a liar, Tacker deflected by asking if Keyhoe would call General White (Chief of Staff of the Air Force) a liar, referencing the book's foreword. Tacker clarified he asked if the foreword claimed General White's statement about UFOs not existing was false. Garroway probed Tacker's position on admitting the existence of a secret document, to which Tacker expressed doubt about whether he could do so officially, but ultimately stated no such document existed.

Further Interview Excerpts and Denials

On page 7, the interview continues with Tacker denying that the Air Force has a policy of downplaying UFO reports. Keyhoe countered by referencing Air Force Regulation 200-2, which allegedly directs efforts to minimize unexplained reports. Tacker cited Section 18, stating all information is to be given to the public and nothing is stamped secret. Garroway pointed out that the information released is minimized. Keyhoe mentioned that in 1957, NICAP requested cases, but received no response. Tacker claimed he provided every requested case. Keyhoe specifically asked about Captain Ryan's case, where the Air Force allegedly ordered a jetliner on a UFO hunt, and the F-89 incident. Tacker denied ever sending a jetliner to pursue such objects.

Keyhoe then referred to a "steel tape and transcript" concerning Captain Raymond Ryan and First Officer William Neff of American Airlines, who reportedly described a UFO chase ordered by Griffiss Air Force Base. The report allegedly confirms they left their course without informing passengers and pursued the UFO to the shores of Lake Ontario. Captain Ryan allegedly confirmed that the Griffiss base requested his assistance in intercepting the unknown flying object. A summary of this well-documented case is said to be in NICAP's confidential report to Congress. Tacker stated he had never seen or heard of this steel tape.

On page 8, Tacker dismisses the witnesses in the Washington sightings as not being experts, despite his own 4000 hours of radar experience. Keyhoe insisted that many people are radar experts and that the objects were tracked on radar, came in formations, separated, and maneuvered at speeds exceeding 1400 km/h. Tacker agreed with the description but maintained that a radar operator is not an expert, Major Keyhoe. Garroway, quoting from an official Air Force book, expressed his disapproval of the Air Force's methods of disqualifying UFO reports, asking if seeing Marilyn Monroe for just one second would be enough to recognize her. Tacker agreed. Garroway then questioned the Air Force's claim of "inaccurate distance estimations" by observers, asking how they knew the estimations were inaccurate. Tacker explained it was through simple mathematical calculations at ATIC, based on the object's given size. When Garroway pointed out the object's size was not given, Tacker clarified that the size was estimated as it appeared, referring to angular size. Tacker insisted that from angular size, distance could be derived, which Garroway noted would interest astronomers and was not the Doppler effect.

Further Denials and Claims of Secrecy

Page 8 continues with Tacker's denial of the Washington sightings being due to temperature inversions, a claim he later confirmed. The article lists several individuals who have rejected the Air Force's inversion theory for this case, including Dr. John Hagin (radio astronomer), McGivren (chief radio engineer at Washington Airport), Harry Barnes (chief controller), and Major Lewis Norman Jr. (radar expert). Keyhoe questioned Tacker about the claim in his book that objects were not detected by radar at Andrews Air Force Base. Tacker initially denied saying this but then confirmed that they were tracked on the radar of the National Airport, not Andrews.

On page 9, Keyhoe mentions a signed report from an Air Force weather observer and radar expert who was in the control tower at Andrews Air Force Base, describing "spots" appearing on the screen. The report from NICAP details objects appearing on radar as if approaching the runway, with orderly and straight flight paths, estimated speeds exceeding 1400 km/h, described as clear, solid spots, not blurred like weather phenomena. The estimated size was 30-60 meters in diameter. After flying over the runway, the objects separated and maneuvered at high speeds, faster than any aircraft seen. Tacker reiterated his stance that these individuals were not experts.

Keyhoe then brought up President Kennedy's statement calling UFOs an "important subject," questioning if Tacker considered the President misled. Tacker acknowledged UFOs as an important subject and stated the Air Force does not deny their existence but simply asserts that no proof has emerged to support the sensational theory of extraterrestrial vehicles in our airspace. Keyhoe then referred to a "strictly secret" assessment from 1948, purportedly stating that these things are interplanetary, first made known by Captain Ruppelt. Tacker claimed he had never heard of it. Keyhoe elaborated, stating that Captain Ruppelt, head of the UFO commission, described it as a black document stamped "Strictly Secret." Later, Major Fournet confirmed the existence of two documents that the Air Force had denied: 1) An assessment of UFOs by the secret service in 1948, and 2) An analysis of UFO information characteristics prepared for the Air Force headquarters in 1952. Fournet stated that as both documents were classified as secret when he last saw them, he could not reveal their content.

Tacker responded by stating that there were no such conclusions from the Air Force. Garroway asked if Tacker, in his official capacity, could admit the existence of a secret document if it were classified. Tacker expressed doubt but ultimately stated that no such document exists.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue of WELTRAUMBOTE revolve around UFO sightings, particularly a significant one over Russia, and the perceived cover-up and disinformation campaign by the US Air Force. The magazine strongly advocates for transparency and investigation into UFO phenomena, championing the work of NICAP. The editorial stance is critical of official explanations and military secrecy, presenting eyewitness accounts and evidence that challenge the official narrative. There is a clear emphasis on the struggle for truth against institutional denial and ridicule, highlighting the importance of public awareness and pressure for disclosure. The magazine positions itself as an independent and critical publication dedicated to disseminating information about UFOs and related topics, aiming to shed light on what it considers a significant aspect of the emerging "spiritual age."

Title: UFO-Nachrichten
Issue: Nr. 58/59
Volume: 7
Date: März/April 1961
Publisher: Flying Saucer Review (Editorial commentary)
Country: Switzerland (Publication origin of UFO-Nachrichten)
Language: German

This issue of UFO-Nachrichten, featuring an editorial commentary from the "Flying Saucer Review," delves deeply into the ongoing controversy surrounding Unidentified Flying Objects (UFOs), focusing on the public debate between Major Donald Keyhoe, director of NICAP, and Colonel Tacker, the US Air Force's primary spokesperson on UFO matters.

Key Debates and Accusations

The central theme revolves around the perceived censorship and obfuscation tactics employed by the US Air Force regarding UFO phenomena. The magazine presents a transcript of a debate or discussion where Tacker initially dismisses Keyhoe's methods as sensationalist, akin to those of novelists. Keyhoe, in turn, challenges Tacker, offering to appear publicly with him and even threatening to resign from NICAP and dissolve the organization if his claims are proven false.

Tacker's response is dismissive, questioning Keyhoe's 'equipment' (a typewriter and stationery) compared to the Air Force's resources. Keyhoe counters by highlighting NICAP's extensive network of consultants, including astronomers and rocket specialists, and accuses the Air Force of having a directive to deny UFO reality and enforce censorship.

Specific Incidents and Air Force Explanations

The issue scrutinizes several UFO sightings and the Air Force's subsequent explanations:

• Red Bluff, California (August): Keyhoe presents the case of two police officers who observed an object hovering 150 meters above their patrol car. The object reportedly scanned the ground with a red light before ascending rapidly. The Air Force radar station at Red Bluff allegedly tracked the object. However, Tacker claims the radar did not track it and that nothing appeared on screen. The "Chronicle" in San Francisco and the "Daily Observer" in Corning are cited, with the former confirming the Red Bluff radar's tracking of an object, while the latter notes a retraction of earlier statements by the police.
• Mars, Aldebaran, and Betelgeuse: Tacker had previously claimed the Red Bluff witnesses were misled by celestial bodies. Keyhoe refutes this, citing a study by the Hayden Planetarium in Boston and other astronomers, which showed Mars, Aldebaran, and Betelgeuse rising hours after the sighting.
• World War II and Korean Cases: The Air Force's explanation for these sightings is attributed to 'static electricity.' Reports from pilots mention pilots referring to these objects as 'fighter-hunters' or 'kobolds.' Some reports describe fear of these objects, which were seen individually and in formations, pursuing aircraft at high speeds.
• January 22, 1959: The Air Force announced that unexplained sightings had dropped to under 1% of all UFO reports. However, in a letter to UFO researcher Lee Munsick, Tacker himself had stated that 9.4% of sightings remained unexplained at the end of 1959.
• Nike Base Case (September 29, 1958): Personnel at a NIKE missile center reported a UFO landing. The initial Air Force explanation was 'flares' used for lighting a power line tower. When this was denied by the power company, Tacker offered an alternative explanation: a spotlight on a farmer's barn. The Air Force's official book omitted the detail that the witnesses were rocket specialists and the explanation about the barn being recently used.
• 1947, 1948, and 1950 Findings: The article mentions the denial of secret Air Force conclusions from 1947 (that UFOs were real), 1948 (that they were interplanetary), and 1950 (analysis confirming interplanetary origin).
• Washington Sightings (July 1952): These sightings triggered a wave of observations. Official reports from military pilots, predating the July sightings, described strange, round objects pursuing aircraft at high speeds. These reports were confirmed by Secretary Kimball, who ordered a Navy investigation.

Criticism of Tacker and the Air Force

Numerous letters to Garroway (Chief of Staff of the Air Force) and Tacker himself express disapproval of Tacker's behavior. He is described as rude, apparently ordered to prevent Keyhoe from speaking, and his actions are seen as providing proof of the Air Force's attempt to withhold the truth about UFOs. His 'condescending laughter' is noted, and his methods are called 'censorship methods.' A professional astronomer views Tacker's behavior as evidence that NICAP is a thorn in the Air Force's side.

The article suggests that Tacker has been the primary Air Force spokesperson on UFO matters for over four years, tasked with writing the official UFO book and leading the ridicule campaign. It posits that his tactics might have been ordered rather than his own choice. The article asserts that Tacker's claims and the official book demonstrate the Air Force's determination to conceal facts.

"Flying Saucers and the U.S. Air Force"

The article references Tacker's book, "Flying Saucers and the U.S. Air Force," and highlights specific points:

• Page 12: Explanations for WWII and Korean cases as 'static electricity.' Mentions pilots' fear of 'geisterjäger' (ghost hunters) or 'kobolds.'
• Page 26: The Nike Base case, where the Air Force's explanation evolved from flares to a barn spotlight, omitting witness expertise.
• Page 33: Denial of secret 1947-1950 Air Force conclusions about UFOs being real and interplanetary.
• Page 47: Tacker's statement that attacks against the Air Force are used to generate interest in sensationalist newspaper articles.
• Pages 56, 65/67: Contradictory statements regarding radar operators' ability to distinguish real objects from meteorological phenomena, with instances where they were reportedly deceived.

The "Flying Saucer Review" Editorial Stance

The editorial from the "Flying Saucer Review" (London, March/April 1961) is presented as a significant shift. It acknowledges the difficulty in determining what to believe regarding UFO contacts. While not dismissing all 'contactee' claims outright, it expresses skepticism towards those who use their stories for commercial gain and present their narratives in an overly dogmatic way. The editorial contrasts this with the more humble and credible reports from individuals like Reverend N. E. G. Cruttwell from Papua.

The editorial questions the 'contactees' approach, suggesting they alienate potential believers rather than convince them. It concludes that while not all stories can be dismissed as false, there remains a "secret behind a secret." The authors admit they do not possess the key to the mystery.

"UFO-Nachrichten" Commentary

Following the "Flying Saucer Review" editorial, "UFO-Nachrichten" provides its own commentary. It notes that the "Flying Saucer Review" has changed its editorial direction, becoming less supportive of 'Adamski-friendly' views. The commentary references previous articles in "UFO-Nachrichten" that discussed the 'Keyhoe vs. Adamski' case and the Papua sighting. It acknowledges that NICAP has positively commented on the Papua sighting, contrary to earlier predictions by the "Flying Saucer Review."

The commentary also addresses accusations that NICAP is collaborating with censorship bodies, stemming from the use of the term 'confidential' in its bulletins. It dismisses this as absurd.

Other Reports and Articles

• "Schatten und Stille" (Shadows and Silence) by Aimé Michel: This section explores the hypothesis of invisible contact and the limitations of human perception. Michel uses analogies of animals (sheep, dogs) to illustrate how beings with a different level of consciousness or a different temporal perception might interact with humans without being perceived. He suggests that our understanding is limited by our sensory and intellectual capacities, akin to a mouse trying to read a book.
• "Beginnt man endlich zu verstehen?" (Is One Finally Beginning to Understand?): This section presents brief reports:
• Frol Koslow (Deputy Prime Minister of Russia): In 1960, Koslow alluded to the Tunguska 'meteor' being a cosmic spaceship and suggested a potential Russian-American alliance to deal with Martians, stating they might be friendly and should be approached peacefully.
• Moscow Airport (August 1959): Three disks, approximately 80 meters in diameter, flew over Moscow Airport, evading jet interceptors. The event was officially deemed an optical illusion, with natural explanations ruled out.
• Poland (1958): Several landings were reported. On February 21, 1959, a mysterious flying object fell into the harbor basin near Danzig.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are UFO censorship by governmental bodies (specifically the US Air Force), the credibility of UFO witnesses and 'contactees,' the scientific investigation of UFO phenomena, and the limitations of human perception in understanding potentially advanced extraterrestrial intelligence. The editorial stance of "UFO-Nachrichten," as indicated by its commentary and the inclusion of the "Flying Saucer Review" editorial, is critical of official denials and obfuscation, advocating for greater transparency and a more open-minded approach to UFO evidence, while maintaining a degree of skepticism towards sensationalist claims.

Title: UFO-Nachrichten
Issue: 58/59
Volume: 1961
Date: 1961
Publisher: UFO-Nachrichten
Country: Germany
Language: German

This issue of UFO-Nachrichten, published in 1961, is dedicated to reports and discussions surrounding unidentified flying objects (UFOs) and related phenomena. It features a collection of sighting reports from various locations, expert opinions, and speculative theories about the origin and nature of these objects.

Key Articles and Reports

International Sightings and Investigations

The magazine opens by noting an increase in reports of extraterrestrial phenomena from Eastern countries. It mentions that the Smithsonian Institute in Washington has identified 4-6 unknown satellites orbiting Earth, including one detected in February 1960 weighing 15 tons. The article highlights the ongoing efforts at the Green Bank radio telescope in Virginia, which has been directed at stars like Tan Ceti and Epsilon Eridani since January 1, 1960, in the hope of recording messages from intelligent extraterrestrial life.

Soviet and International Space Theories

Professors Schklowskij and Ary Sternfeld, along with Dr. Fred Singer, former astronomical advisor to President Eisenhower, are cited. Notably, Prof. Leonid Sedow, President of the Soviet Union's Interplanetary Committee, declared that the moons of Mars are artificial, created by Martians. His associate, Prof. Ogorodnikow, expressed a belief in life on Mars and suggested that Venus might also harbor life, stating that the Moon is currently the focus of their efforts, with plans to send automated probes.

Venus Mission and Lunar Research

The issue notes a deviation from the planned program, with a Venus rocket launched before a planned lunar mission. Dr. Robert S. Richardson (USA) is quoted as saying Venus could be a great surprise of the space age. The article questions why, after 18 months since Prof. Ogorodnikow's statements, lunar research has not progressed further, despite the Moon being the current focus.

Lunar Inhabitation and Anomalies

A BBC broadcast from February 5, 1960, featuring Desmond Leslie, is discussed. Leslie recounted showing astronomer Prof. Percy Wilkins a remarkable photograph of the Gassendi crater on the Moon, which exhibited geometric forms and parallel lines resembling a space base. Wilkins had also observed these lines and drawn them, noting their similarity to the photograph. Wilkins also reported seeing a large, luminous object rise from a lunar crater.

Correspondence and Warnings

In September 1959, Christopher Shawcross, President of the Provisional International Institute for Space Law, wrote to Prof. Sedow, warning him of the possibility of an Earth invasion by extraterrestrial beings and urging him to consider the exploration of Earth by alien life. Shawcross suggested that while flying saucers might be a myth, there could be a kernel of truth within the mythology.

"Weltrundschau" - Global UFO Reports

This section compiles various UFO sightings from around the world:

• December 2, Coventry: A large, glowing object with smoke emissions, identified as not being Sputnik VI.
• October 18, between New York and Chicago: A jetliner was followed by a UFO, with the pilot, Capt. Petrie, capturing photographic evidence. The official explanation of a balloon was deemed unconvincing.
• December 10, en route from Montreal to Seven Islands: Trans-Canada-Airlines pilot C. Ward and his passengers observed a UFO. Ward was reportedly silenced by his superiors.
• January 3, Johannesburg: A balloon-shaped object hovered over the suburbs for two hours before rapidly disappearing against the wind.
• October 4, Staroleka, Poland: A "Flying Saucer" was observed, emitting intense light and moving in various directions.
• October 11: A large golden UFO was sighted near Dublin.
• December 5, Chanteau, France: An object resembling flames was seen rotating and flying horizontally for three minutes.

Detailed Case Reports

Case 1 (Referencing Nr. 56/57, p. 23): Salvatore Cianci, a jeweler from Syracuse, Sicily, reported seeing a small being with a phosphorescent suit, diving helmet, and small wings instead of arms, which then vanished. Cianci is described as a credible witness.

Case 2 (Referencing Nr. 58/59, p. 16): Rémy Carbonnier, a 48-year-old roofer from Londe, France, described witnessing a round, shining object, about 6 meters wide, with three leg-like supports, hovering near train tracks at 3:30 AM on November 19, 1960. The object ascended vertically and disappeared without a sound.

Case 3 (Referencing Nr. 60/61, p. 23): The sighting by Reverend Lionel Browning and his wife in Cressy, Tasmania, is detailed. A cigar-shaped object, 120 meters long and 150 meters high, appeared. It was followed by five or six small discs. The Australian House of Representatives reportedly considered forming an investigation committee.

December 5, Dijon, France: A blue object was observed emitting a strong whistling sound before disappearing.

A 1908 "Flying Saucer" Sighting

Paul Luthringer, a retired police inspector, recounts seeing a bright, round object moving slowly in the sky over Maria-Luisa-Platz in Sofia in 1908 or 1909. The object was roughly the size of a football and attracted a crowd of onlookers.

"Hinweise - Notizen" (Hints - Notes)

This section provides supplementary information:

• Radio Astronomy and Extraterrestrial Signals: It expands on previous reports about radio astronomer Prof. Ronald Bracewell, mentioning the existence of large radio telescopes in Green Bank (Virginia), Stamford (California), Cheshire (UK), Münstereifel, and Kiel (Germany). Prof. Bracewell believes that radio signals detected since 1927 are "coded transmissions" from space, originating from intelligent life on other planets. He predicts that messages will be deciphered within three years.
• Alternative Interpretation of Signals: The article suggests that these signals might not be codes but the actual languages of "Uraniden" (space beings), challenging the idea that they communicate in English or German, as claimed by some contactees like Adamski. It posits that science might be deliberately withholding information.

Solar Activity and Planetary Influences

An article by Dr. Martin discusses the increased solar activity, manifested as sunspots, and its correlation with Earthly events, including wars, economic crises, and fluctuations in the Cold War. These solar storms are said to cause intense magnetic storms in the ionosphere, disrupting radio communications and triggering earth tremors. Furthermore, solar activity is linked to a significant increase in heart attacks among sensitive individuals, leading hospitals to postpone surgeries during peak periods.

Planetary Influences on Earth

The article notes that planets can also exert similar influences. The Radio Corporation of America has observed that Jupiter and Saturn, in specific positions, can generate powerful magnetic storms, a phenomenon that astrologers have long claimed but which scientists previously dismissed.

Dr. Wilhelm Martin's Statements

Dr. Wilhelm Martin's remarks at the Wiesbaden Congress are highlighted:

• Mercury's Habitability: Martin suggests that Mercury's polar regions might be habitable due to cooler temperatures, contrary to the belief that the planet is scorched.
• Lunar Far Side: He references observations from a hundred years ago and Sputnik's images of the Moon's far side, suggesting it differs from the near side. He explains this by the Earth's gravitational pull, which might prevent an atmosphere from forming on the side facing Earth.

Dr. Martin's Worldview

Dr. Martin believes the current astronomical worldview is a deception and that new discoveries will eventually reveal the truth, making current resistance to these ideas seem incomprehensible.

Dirk Doman's Article

The article recommends an essay by Dirk Doman titled "A Congress and its Consequences," published in "Ventil" and "UFO-Nachrichten" Nr. 54, which offers a comprehensive perspective on the UFO problem.

Swedish Air Force Investigation

The Swedish Air Force has launched a large-scale investigation into whether a connection exists between flight accidents and periodic solar eruptions. They are exploring if atmospheric and geomagnetic changes associated with solar activity could be causes of aircraft accidents, which have typically been attributed to human error.

The Killian Case Details

Two important details are added to the Killian case (a 45-minute UFO sighting involving a pilot, co-pilot, crew, and 35 passengers):

1. During the UFO encounter (between 21:15 and 21:20), multiple people on the ground in Akron also witnessed the UFOs, indicating they were seen from both the air and the ground simultaneously.
2. Killian's airline, American Airlines, had previously reported that a significant number of their pilots had reported their own sightings from the Midwest, the same region as Capt. Killian.

"Astronom gegen Luftwaffe" (Astronomer vs. Air Force)

An ex-member of the satellite observation team at the Smithsonian Institute has joined NICAP as an advisor, urging a serious scientific study of UFOs. Walter N. Webb advocates for NICAP to challenge official policies and highlight the serious nature of UFO phenomena. Webb states that after eight years of study, he concludes that UFOs are real, material objects and manned spacecraft from advanced extraterrestrial civilizations.

He criticizes the American Air Force's approach of explaining away or concealing sightings, citing the Levelland, Texas incident in 1957, where "ball lightning" was used to explain a UFO. Webb believes the public is not being told the truth about UFOs and calls for scientific acceptance and rigorous study, including measurements using specialized equipment.

"Corriere della Sera" - UFOs Not Built on Earth

This section features an article by Maner Lualdi from the Milan newspaper "Corriere della Sera." Lualdi, a respected pilot and reporter, argues that UFOs are not of Earthly origin. He suggests that Italians would accept the truth about extraterrestrial UFOs, whereas in America, such a revelation might cause panic due to a perceived radical societal shift.

Lualdi recounts an experience on October 17, 1957, with engineer Luigi Nardi, where they observed a fast-moving, round, luminous object. He consulted Professor Abetti, who confirmed it was not a comet due to its ability to change speed and direction instantly. Lualdi initially believed UFOs might be advanced human technology, citing reports of supersonic aircraft and new flying machines. However, he now dismisses this, arguing that modern surveillance systems would prevent such a secret from being kept by either the US or Russia. He points out that despite the space race and massive budgets, Earth's rockets and spacecraft lag far behind the capabilities of UFOs. If either superpower possessed such technology, the Cold War dynamics would be entirely different.

Radio Moscow on the 1908 Tunguska Event

This report from "France-Soir" details Soviet research on the 1908 "Tunguska Meteorite." Russian scientists who investigated the site found that trees were flattened but not burned, and the rings of trees near the explosion center showed signs of radioactivity dating back to 1908 and continuing for over a decade. The article emphasizes the presence of radioactivity and the term "atomic explosion." It concludes that since humanity had not yet discovered atomic power in 1908, and natural celestial bodies do not explode atomically, the object must have come from outside Earth, with an atomically powered spacecraft being the most plausible explanation. This aligns with the views of Russian professors Liapunow, Alexander Kasanzew, and Professor Ary Sternfeld.

The absence of an impact crater and the specific pattern of tree damage (only crowns and upper branches were severed) suggest the explosion occurred above ground. This further supports the theory that it was not a natural celestial body. While Professor Kulik may have hesitated to draw such conclusions due to their extraordinary nature, expeditions consistently reached similar findings.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the prevalence of UFO sightings worldwide, the scientific and public interest in extraterrestrial life, and the perceived secrecy or downplaying of evidence by official bodies, particularly military and governmental organizations. There is a strong undercurrent of skepticism towards official explanations and a belief that the public is not being fully informed. The magazine appears to advocate for open investigation and acceptance of the possibility of extraterrestrial visitation, often highlighting anecdotal evidence and expert opinions that support these views. The editorial stance leans towards the belief that UFOs are real, advanced craft, likely of non-terrestrial origin, and that their existence poses significant questions for humanity's understanding of the universe and its place within it.

This issue of the magazine presents a comprehensive bibliography of German-language literature concerning UFOs and related phenomena, primarily focusing on books and publications from the 1950s and early 1960s. The content delves into various aspects of the UFO topic, including contactee experiences, religious interpretations, and scientific inquiries.

Featured Publications and Reviews

'Flying Saucerama' by Dr. Frank E. Stranges

The bibliography begins with a review of "Flying Saucerama" by Dr. Frank E. Stranges, published by The International Evangelism Crusades Inc. This 150-page book reportedly includes "previously inaccessible reports" and 55 new photos, discussing UFOs, their connection to biblical accounts, and the US Air Force's perspective. The author's conclusions are exclusively based on religious grounds, with chapter titles like "Hallucination or Reality?", "Are UFOs a Russian Secret Weapon?", "An American One?", "Are they Extraterrestrial?", "Fakes, Swindles and Stupidity," and "Angel Visits."

'My friend beyond Earth' by Ventla-Verlag

Another publication, "My friend beyond Earth," a brochure from Ventla-Verlag, is described as an experience entirely within the religious sphere. Frank Stranges, President of the International Evangelism Crusades Inc., recounts being greeted by a "Venusian" during a secret visit to the Pentagon. This Venusian purportedly came to help humanity return to the Lord and mentioned that 77 of his colleagues were active in the USA. The narrative is enriched with biblical quotes and an eschatologically tinged meditation from a UFO perspective.

'Schaut empor!' by Ray and Rex Stanford

The German version of a booklet by the Stanford twins, "Schaut empor!" (Look Up!), published by Ventla-Verlag, is welcomed. This 77-page work details contacts with UFO pilots via "telepathic rays." The accounts are considered convincing, as participants were led to the meeting location, and the UFO's movements indicated its pilots understood the thoughts of those waiting on Earth. The booklet includes photos, sketches, affidavits (even from police officers), and explanations about the nature of UFOs, their rays, connections to Earthly mystery schools, and the guarding of Earth.

The Reeves' UFO Pilgrimage

A significant portion of the issue is dedicated to a review of "Die UFO-Pilgerreise der Reeves" (The Reeves' UFO Pilgrimage) by Bryant and Helen Reeve. The book details their 37,000 km study tour from 1954 to 1956, visiting various "contactees" and UFO protagonists. The review highlights information about spaceships, radio contacts with Dr. George H. Williamson, and accounts from Villanueva, Bethurum, van Tassel, and Fry. It also touches upon the work of Dr. Meade Layne and the Borderland Sciences Research Associates, discussing the challenges faced by UFO researchers who may withdraw when the "supra-physical aspects" of the phenomena become overwhelming.

The review emphasizes the difficulties pioneers face, including job loss and witnesses' fear of institutionalization. It notes that religious organizations are often unsupportive of UFO research. The article quotes the Reeves stating that conventional teachings do not provide the answers sought and that one must "break through the cosmic barrier" by turning to books offering a "cosmic outlook," mentioning "A Dweller on two Planets" and "Autobiographie eines Yogi."

The Reeves' book also explores philosophical and religious viewpoints, including interpretations of Jesus' teachings and prophecies. It addresses the possibility of UFOs having both physical and supra-physical aspects, with phenomena from higher dimensions being difficult to fit into a three-dimensional framework. The authors suggest that UFOs can achieve near-instantaneous travel via teleportation, potentially reaching Venus or its vicinity.

Regarding the greatest danger, the book points to atomic energy and its experimentation. The authors also discuss the necessity of telepathy for communication with "space people" and question why some contactees claim to speak English with them. The book delves into "Stages of Knowledge," inhabitants of space, vibrational speed, cosmic relationships, and various forms of perception and consciousness, including telepathy, clairvoyance, and automatic writing.

'Ein neues UFO-Blatt' (A New UFO Newsletter)

This section introduces the first issue of "Mitteilungen der Gesellschaft für Interplanetarik" (Communications of the Society for Interplanetarics) from Vienna. The newsletter honors Professor Hermann Oberth and aims to provide a more precise reporting of communications than previously achieved. It features an article by Dr. Ing. Fritz Umschaden, who previously spoke positively about UFOs on the radio. Umschaden notes that those who build and pilot these unknown objects are technologically far advanced, suggesting they must be extraterrestrial. He also comments on the "flying saucer psychosis" that emerged in the USA after World War II.

The newsletter highlights credible observations of "mysterious flying phenomena" dating back to 1461, including a luminous disc-shaped object observed over Arras, France. It also mentions a year-long investigation by Soviet scientists into photobilds sent from an interplanetary station, with findings presented at the International Astronautical Congress in 1960. The issue concludes by encouraging the publication of more UFO newsletters, emphasizing their role in general enlightenment and the occasional presentation of truly special information.

Einschl

This section lists various German-language books and publications related to UFOs, providing authors, titles, publishers, page counts, prices (in DM and Swiss Francs), and brief descriptions. Notable entries include:

• "Der Weltraum rückt uns näher" by Donald E. Keyhoe
• "Ufos, Atomkräfte und unsere Zukunft" by Dr. Wilhelm Martin
• "Untertassen-Pilgerfahrt" by Bryant and Helen Reeve
• "Schaut empor!" by Ray and Rex Stanford
• "UFO-Sichtungen über der Schweiz 1947/1958"
• "Das Kommen der Raummenschen" by Dr. Gilbert Holloway
• "Zwei denkwürdige Nächte" by Carl A. Anderson
• "Das Erlebnis von White Sands und Alans Botschaft" by Daniel Fry
• "Das Geheimnis der Untertassen" by Orfeo M. Angelucci
• "Ultimatum des Weltalls" by Hermann Grettler
• "Nahe an 2000 Jahre" by M. Kahir

It also lists "UFO-Nachrichten," a monthly publication, and mentions that back issues of "Weltraumbote" are available.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the exploration of UFO phenomena, the nature of extraterrestrial contact, and the intersection of these topics with religion, spirituality, and science. The editorial stance appears to be one of open inquiry into the UFO subject, presenting a range of perspectives from religious interpretations to more scientific investigations, while also acknowledging the skepticism and resistance from conventional authorities. The bibliography and reviews suggest a desire to inform readers about the existing literature on UFOs, encouraging further study and discussion.