Vimana 21 - No 34 - 1er trim 1989

Magazine Overview

Title: Vimana 21
Issue: n° 34
Publisher: A.D.R.U.P. (Association Dijonnaise de Recherches Ufologiques et Parapsychologiques)
Date: 1990 (implied by 'meilleurs voeux pour l'année 1990' in the President's letter)
Language: French
Country: France

President's Letter

The President of A.D.R.U.P. thanks readers for their loyalty to Vimana and wishes them a happy new year 1990. He notes that 1989 was a less active year for ufological and parapsychological investigations in their region, with no UFO investigations and only one parapsychological case turning out to be a hoax. He highlights the case of Poncey-sur-l'Ignon (1954) as a double case that remains an enigma, questioning why it's not cited in 'Grande Peur Martienne'. The president also mentions an article on 17th-century sorcery in Burgundy and the legend of the Count of Chalon's abduction by the devil. Despite a slower pace for the association, exchanges remain rich, and they hosted the 34th CNEGU session in Francheville in September.

Table of Contents

• PARAPSYCHOLOGY:
• "Etrange oui ... inventé non" by Michel GRANGER
• Haunted houses by ADRUP
• Press articles

• FOLKLORE:
• Sorcery in Burgundy in the 17th century by Jean-Pierre BRESSAND

• UFOLOGY:
• Case of traces in Italy, Italian reviews with translation CVLDLN
• Marliens by Patrice VACHON
• Poncey-sur-l'Ignon (1954) by ADRUP
• Appendix: Montallery: similar case to Poncey, from Phénomènes Spaciaux n° 31

Article: "Etrange oui... Inventé non!" by Michel GRANGER

Michel Granger discusses the scarcity of French cases in his 'strange things' column, noting a dominance of Anglo-Saxon sources. He laments the lack of interest from French media in these taboo subjects, contrasting it with the high circulation of similar magazines in the US and UK. He mentions the short-lived French magazine 'Mysterama' and praises 'Le Monde Inconnu' for publishing some of his past chronicles. Granger then introduces a case from January 1987, which he read about in the Weekly World News, concerning a 'talking urn' from Dijon, France. A 56-year-old widow claimed to hear her deceased husband's voice from his urn. The case was examined by Dr. Henri Prétet, a psychiatrist from Dijon, who initially suspected psychosis but later, after intensive therapy, agreed to listen to the urn himself. He reported hearing a rustling sound, like buzzing bees, and discerned three phrases: "I love you. Don't worry. We will meet again one day." Dr. Prétet conducted tests, including a scanner, on the widow, noting intense mental activity in her brainwaves when the urn 'whispered', but found no direct telepathic link. He suggested the sound might have another origin, and the subject reacted to it. Granger's counter-investigation proved sterile. He contacted reporter Martha Atkins but received no reply. He also found a Henri Prétet in Dijon via Minitel but received no interview. He then alerted Patrice Vachon of ADRUP, who visited the individual and confirmed he was not the person they sought, but a retired military man who claimed no understanding of the matter. Granger also investigated a Gérard Hersent in Levallois Perret, who was an acoustic expert, but found no record of him. Granger concludes that the case appears to be a hoax or mystification, emphasizing the need for vigilance against sensationalism to maintain credibility. He advises young enthusiasts to be open-minded but not overly so, to avoid being misled by 'balloons of hot air'. He notes a further development from a letter by M. Vachon, who discovered an important acoustics laboratory in Compiègne specializing in industrial applications of low frequencies and ultrasound, but they had never heard of a Gérard Hersant.

Article: "Les maisons hantées" (Haunted Houses)

This section discusses the phenomenon of haunted houses, acknowledging that it is often shrouded in mystery and evocative imagery, citing famous haunted castles in Scotland. It notes that not only old buildings but also modern ones can be affected. The article questions whether hauntings are real or merely psychic elucubrations of mediums or individuals with overactive imaginations. While many cases have rational explanations, some defy understanding and challenge our 'spirit' and scientific assumptions. The phenomenon is not confined to ancient times; it exists today. The article mentions the famous Amityville case, where a family experienced 28 days of terror after moving into a house near New York, involving a brutal, unmotivated crime. It also recounts the story of Sarah Winchester, heiress to the Winchester Repeating Arms Company, who built a sprawling, 160-room house between 1884 and 1922 in San José, USA. Tormented by the spirits of Native Americans killed by Winchester rifles and influenced by spiritualism, she was compelled to build continuously. The article states that the phenomenon is universal, with Great Britain reportedly having the highest number of haunted houses.

Article: "La sorcellerie en Bourgogne au 17ème siècle" (Sorcery in Burgundy in the 17th Century)

This article, by Jean-Pierre Bressand, delves into the history of sorcery in the Burgundy region during the 17th century. It highlights the difficult living conditions of the era and mentions a legend about the abduction of the Count of Chalon by the devil, originating from the Saône et Loire region. The text suggests that even monks used the devil as a cover for their misdeeds, employing the proverb "Evil to him who evil thinks" (Malin, malin et demi).

Article: "Cas de traces en Italie, revues italiennes avec traduction CVLDLN"

This entry refers to a case of traces found in Italy, based on Italian reviews translated by CVLDLN.

Article: "Marliens par Patrice VACHON"

This is a contribution by Patrice Vachon concerning the Marliens case.

Article: "Poncey-sur-l'Ignon (1954) par l'ADRUP"

This section details ADRUP's investigation into the Poncey-sur-l'Ignon case from 1954, described as a 'double case' and an enigma.

Appendix: "Montallery : cas similaire à Poncey, tiré de Phénomènes Spaciaux n° 31"

This appendix presents the Montallery case, noted as being similar to the Poncey case, and is sourced from 'Phénomènes Spaciaux' issue n° 31.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently explores the unexplained, bridging ufology, parapsychology, and folklore. There's a clear interest in investigating cases thoroughly, as demonstrated by the 'contre-enquête' (counter-investigation) approach. The editorial stance, particularly from Michel Granger, emphasizes critical thinking and caution against sensationalism and hoaxes, urging researchers to remain grounded while maintaining an open mind. The publication also highlights regional phenomena, particularly those from the Côte d'Or, while acknowledging the influence of international reports.

This issue of LE BIEN PUBLIC, dated January 20, 1989, focuses on a variety of intriguing topics, including a criminal case involving a fraudulent medium, numerous accounts of haunted houses and paranormal phenomena, predictions for the upcoming year from psychics, and a historical examination of witchcraft trials.

Fraudulent Medium Arrested in Dijon

The lead story, "Dijon: Fausse magnétiseuse, vraie escroc" (Dijon: Fake medium, real crook), details the arrest of Djamila Afroun, a 37-year-old woman who operated as a medium and psychic named Iris Thiou in Dijon. She was accused of defrauding clients, most notably by selling a non-existent Ferrari Testarossa for 880,000 francs, having already received an initial payment of 178,000 francs. The article highlights her passion for luxury cars and her history of previous convictions for fraud and abuse of confidence. She was presented to the prosecutor in Lyon and incarcerated, with investigations ongoing into other potential transactions.

Haunted Houses and Paranormal Phenomena Across Europe

Several articles document various alleged hauntings and unexplained occurrences. In Italy, a house in Turin experienced spontaneous combustions, moving furniture, and fires in 1975. England saw a case where a little girl claimed to hear a "Dr. Becker" in a haunted house, with investigators finding evidence of his past presence. France is presented as having its own collection of haunted sites, including the old abbey of Mortimer, where spirits are said to haunt its ruins, and the manor of Bouchevillers in Vexin, known for materializations and auditory phenomena. Other reported incidents include inexplicable events in Mailly-l'Eglise (1674), Bordeaux (1891), Montfavet (1899), near Avallon (1910), Pont-de-Roide (1955), near Digne (1956), St-Pupicin (1956), Belleherbe (1958), Haute-Saône (1977), and Séron (1979), involving poltergeist activity, apparitions, and unexplained noises.

Psychic Predictions for 1989

Another section, "Ce que les voyantes prédisent pour 1989" (What the psychics predict for 1989), compiles forecasts from several seers regarding political figures and societal trends. They largely agreed that François Mitterrand would remain president, Michel Rocard would depart, and AIDS would remain undefeated. Predictions for other politicians like Jacques Chirac, Raymond Barre, and Jean-Marie Le Pen varied. The economic outlook for 1989 was generally seen as bleak, with forecasts of strikes, stagnant purchasing power, and potential crises. Several psychics also predicted various natural disasters, including floods, earthquakes, and tidal waves, but noted potential improvements in the SNCF and air transport safety. Medical advancements were also anticipated, particularly in the fight against cancer, with a potential breakthrough in radiology.

Witchcraft in 17th Century Burgundy

The issue also features a historical analysis titled "LA SORCELLERIE EN BOURGOGNE AU XVIIE SIECLE" (Witchcraft in Burgundy in the 17th Century). This section explores the origins of sorcery, its intersection with Christianity, and the procedures used in witchcraft trials. It explains how pagan beliefs were integrated into Christian practices, leading to superstitions. The article details the legal and ecclesiastical procedures, including the use of torture to extract confessions, and the infamous "Malleus Maleficarum" (Hammer of Witches) as a guide for magistrates. It highlights the societal belief in the tangible presence and actions of Satan, and how judges, bound by their conscience, condemned individuals, often leading to execution by burning at the stake, decapitation, or drowning.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the persistent belief in the supernatural (hauntings, psychic phenomena, witchcraft) alongside the reality of human deception and crime (fraud). The magazine appears to present these diverse topics factually, allowing readers to draw their own conclusions, particularly in the case of alleged paranormal events and historical accusations of witchcraft. The editorial stance seems to be one of reporting on intriguing events and historical phenomena without necessarily endorsing supernatural explanations, while clearly condemning criminal fraud.

This issue of Archivio Casistica, dated August 7, 1985, with the identifier "no 85 PN 14," focuses on two main themes: historical witchcraft trials in 17th century Bourgogne, France, and contemporary UFO sightings in Italy.

Witchcraft Trials in 17th Century Bourgogne

The magazine details the intense period of witchcraft accusations and trials in Bourgogne, France, during the 17th century. It highlights the societal context, the legal procedures, and the varying attitudes of different judicial bodies. The text notes that while accusations were often based on flimsy evidence, the prevailing mentality led to severe punishments, including burning at the stake. However, it also points out that some contemporary figures, like Jacques Chevannes and Philibert de la Mare, expressed skepticism about these accusations, suggesting that alleged sorcerers were merely "poor stupid people" suffering from mental disturbances.

The article discusses how regional Parlements, particularly Paris and Dijon, became more reserved in their approach to capital convictions for witchcraft. An edict in July 1682, signed by Louis XIV, Colbert, and Le Tellier, is mentioned as an attempt to regulate the issue, implicitly negating the concept of a pact with the devil. Despite these efforts, the pursuit of witchcraft cases proved difficult to suppress entirely.

A study by Pascal Boully, published in the Annales de Bourgogne, indicates that between 1626 and 1660, 139 witchcraft-related cases were recorded in Bourgogne, with 59 concerning spells and hexes. The text notes that appellate courts often reduced sentences from lower courts, with 14 acquittals by lower courts compared to 91 by appellate courts. The distribution of accused individuals was relatively balanced between men and women, challenging the traditional image of witchcraft as solely a female crime.

The article touches upon the role of peasant credulity, exacerbated by harsh conditions in 1644 (armed bands, unfavorable weather), in fostering fanaticism and superstition. It mentions specific cases, such as that of François Musnier, accused of identifying sorcerers, and the "little prophet" of Arcée, who claimed to identify witches by examining villagers' pupils. The Parlement of Dijon's intervention in a case involving the "little prophet" is described, where a delegate, Barbier, exposed the impostor by having suspects examined twice with different attire.

Jacques d'Autun is cited regarding the dangers faced by lower court officials who might be accused of complicity if they did not hasten judgments. The text also mentions efforts by the Parlement of Bourgogne in 1644 to ensure regular criminal justice, forbidding private actions like shaving or bathing suspects. A general decree in 1635 prohibited the use of the water ordeal, reserving final judgment for the Parlement. In July 1644, only three capital sentences were confirmed, and in January 1645, two widows were banished, while others were acquitted or sent away.

For 12 individuals condemned to the pyre, the primary sentence was perpetual or temporary banishment, with Dijon judges often opting for a 9-year exile. Even when confessions were made, sentences were sometimes commuted. The article notes instances where parliamentary courts reduced banishment periods or annulled exile sentences, releasing accused individuals.

The Burgundian court also took action against those who engaged in summary justice, condemning peasants who committed "murders and assassinations" in defiance of court orders. Three collective sentences resulted in the execution of eight peasants from Mailly in August 1644, two inhabitants of Grolay in August 1645, and four "justiciers" from Pouilly en Auxois in February 1646.

Despite the edicts of 1635, the multiplication of excesses in 1644-1645 led the Dijon court to reiterate its injunctions to local authorities. The Parlement was frustrated by the indiscipline of lower jurisdictions, which failed to respect appeals, retained cases that should have been transferred, did not execute general decrees, and sometimes failed to implement simple decisions.

The Case of Barbe Buvée

Following the major witch hunts of 1644-1645, a period of relative calm was followed by the case of possession in Auxonne. The troubles began with a young nun in the Ursuline convent in Auxonne in 1658. By the end of the year, 15 nuns were reportedly possessed and undergoing exorcism. The exorcists suspected witchcraft and sorcery within the convent. In the spring of 1660, Ursuline nuns denounced several women from Auxonne, who were then arrested and tried. The Parlement of Dijon took up the case on appeal, concerning four widows accused of attending sabbaths and practicing witchcraft. The Parlement overturned the initial judgment, banishing two widows and acquitting the others.

Further developments involved accusations against the Ursuline nun Barbe Buvée, accused by Claude Bourgeot and other nuns of being the source of the demonic disturbances. Barbe Buvée, who had previously served as a superior in Flavigny, had arrived in Auxonne in 1651 and had been in conflict with the convent's spiritual director. She had largely withdrawn from public life since 1658.

In November 1660, the official of Besançon initiated proceedings, leading to Barbe Buvée's arrest and investigation into charges of magic, sorcery, and infanticide. While imprisoned, Barbe Buvée filed a petition with the Parlement of Dijon, citing measures of sequestration and violence, and challenging the religious tribunal's jurisdiction. The Parlement ordered her transfer to Dijon, but the transfer was complicated by alleged demonic interference. A second expedition succeeded in bringing her to Dijon.

The case gained significant attention, leading to conflicting opinions. An arrêt in January 1661 ordered a new inquiry into the accusations. This inquiry revealed disorders within the convent and sexual troubles among the possessed nuns. The Parlement ordered the restitution of Barbe Buvée's property and opened an investigation against Claudine Bourgeot for counterfeiting possession. However, obtaining documents and cooperation from the nuns proved difficult, and the investigation stalled by the autumn of 1661.

In August 1662, the Parlement of Bourgogne issued its final ruling, stating that Barbe Buvée, upon release, would be transferred to another monastery. An inquiry was to be conducted into the conspiracy against her, and Claudine Bourgeot, held in prison, was to be tried.

In Paris, legal battles continued. In October 1662, Chancellor Seguier entrusted the intendant Bouchu with a new, comprehensive inquiry into the possession of the Ursulines, bypassing the Parlement of Dijon's previous findings.

Within a month, the intendant, theologians, and a physician concluded that there were no certain signs of possession. However, the reasons for this change of opinion remain unclear. The intendant Bouchu, resuming the investigation, concluded that witchcraft had indeed been cast upon several nuns, and 29 of them accused Barbe Buvée.

After prolonged legal disputes between the intendant and the Parlement, the King's Council transferred the entire case to the Parlement of Paris, which was expected to lead to Barbe Buvée's acquittal, given Parisian legal traditions.

The intendant was not discredited, but the nun's situation remained precarious. The Parlement of Paris appears to have shelved the case, as it was not called up for hearing by December 1666.

The End of Witchcraft Trials and the Dawn of Ufology

The 17th century marked the end of the era of witchcraft trials. Since 1682, a general ordinance had abolished witchcraft as a crime. Henceforth, focus shifted to mental illnesses and seducers exploiting popular credulity. The intelligentsia no longer believed in witchcraft. The article posits that despite the legislative changes, the practices of witchcraft and malevolence likely persisted, though the current study does not extend to contemporary times.

UFOs and Mysterious Traces in Italy

The latter part of the magazine shifts to the topic of ufology, reporting on mysterious traces discovered in Italy in August 1985. The article "LA NOTTE" from August 9, 1985, describes an investigation in Pordenone concerning burnt, geometric traces found in a cornfield. A military air force officer on a reconnaissance flight discovered these traces, which formed a triangle connecting three circular areas, the largest being 25 meters in diameter.

"L'ARENA" (Verona) also reported on August 9, 1985, about four circles found in a cornfield near Pordenone, speculating about a UFO landing. Antonio Chiumento, vice president of the National Ufological Center, conducted an aerial survey and described a large circular trace of 25 meters in diameter, with smaller circles inside and adjacent to it. The plants within the circles were crushed and rolled, with shredded leaves appearing cooked.

"IL MESSAGGERO" (Roma) on August 9, 1985, reported UFO sightings in a cornfield near Pordenone, with extraterrestrials allegedly leaving a large circular trace.

"La STAMPA" on August 9, 1985, detailed Chiumento's investigation into a new enigma: a 25-meter diameter circle discovered by an air force non-commissioned officer. Chiumento observed crushed plants, shredded leaves, and plants broken inside smaller circles. He suggested that something from the sky had landed there.

"LA SICILIA" on August 12, 1985, mentioned mysterious traces discovered in a cornfield near Pordenone, along the road from Zoppola to Domaninis. The traces, described as plants not being trampled but lowered over several meters, were noted by Professor Chiumento.

An observation from Brescia is also mentioned, where neither lightning nor chemical reactions could explain a gigantic trace found in a cornfield. Soil analyses revealed a high concentration of calcium.

"IL PICCOLO" on August 13, 1985, reported that UFOs seemed to be "looking for a house" in the Frioul region. A pilot photographed circular traces in a cornfield near Zoppola, located near a military powder magazine. The traces, visible from the sky, included a 25-meter diameter circle and smaller points. The plants were crushed, shredded, and appeared dehydrated. Chiumento stated that this was a very unusual case, with no local witnesses reporting anything unusual. He collected leaf samples for analysis.

"MESSAGERO VENETO" on August 13, 1985, discussed the possibility of a UFO landing in Domanins, near Pordenone. Ufologists were intrigued by a regular circle, about 25 meters in diameter, with two smaller circles. The plants were crushed and their leaves shredded, as if subjected to intense heat. Chiumento suggested it was likely a trace left by a UFO, noting the absence of signs of passage from an agricultural machine and the regularity of the pattern.

"IL GAZZETTINO" on August 13, 1985, reported on a strange trace photographed from the sky in Zoppola, with ET in the corn. A 25-meter diameter circle and three smaller points were observed, forming a perfect triangle when connected. The plants were broken and shredded. Chiumento noted that local farmers excluded atmospheric phenomena or agricultural machinery as causes and mentioned previous observations in the Pordenone province.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The issue juxtaposes historical investigations into witchcraft with contemporary reports of UFO phenomena. The editorial stance appears to be one of historical inquiry and open-minded reporting on unexplained events. The magazine presents detailed accounts of legal proceedings and societal beliefs surrounding witchcraft in 17th century France, while simultaneously documenting and analyzing recent UFO sightings and their physical evidence in Italy. The transition from the historical belief in demonic influence to the modern investigation of extraterrestrial phenomena is implicitly highlighted, suggesting a continuity in humanity's fascination with the unknown and the unexplained. The article concludes by noting that while the era of witchcraft trials ended in the 17th century, the underlying human tendencies towards superstition and the search for explanations for unusual events persist, even if the focus has shifted to phenomena like UFOs.

Title: CIRCULARE DE BLITZ
Issue: No. 19
Date: December 1986
Publisher: CIRCULARE DE BLITZ
Country: Italy
Language: French

This issue of Circulare de Blitz focuses on UFO sightings and associated trace evidence reported in Italy. It presents a collection of cases from various regions and time periods, primarily from the 1970s and 1980s, with detailed accounts from witnesses and the investigations conducted by ufologists.

Italian UFO Cases and Trace Evidence

Calalzo di Cadore (BI) - August 15, 1986

The issue details an incident where spouses Angelo and Grazia R. in the province of Belluno reported seeing a luminous object descend from the sky. They experienced a sudden loss of consciousness for approximately two hours. Upon waking, they discovered a circular trace in the ground, nine meters in circumference, where the object had reportedly landed.

Mategliano (Ud) - September 23, 1986

In Mategliano, Udine, several peasants observed a silver, disc-shaped object lifting off from a field. The object left behind a trace approximately ten meters in diameter, consisting of flattened grass.

Fiesso Umbertiano (RO) - October 12, 1986

An article from "Il resto del Carlino" reports a fireball-shaped object landing near Fiesso Umbertiano. The object reportedly took off immediately, leaving three circular traces, each 45 cm in diameter, arranged in an equilateral triangle. The plants within these traces were bent towards the ground.

Chivasso - February 12, 1987

An unusual event occurred in Chivasso when an enormous block of ice fell from the sky, disintegrating into pieces. It left an oval trace, 50 cm in size, at the impact point. Analysis by the local health unit (USL) found only water with some impurities, leading to the hypothesis that it was debris from an aircraft's toilet.

Archivio Casistica, April 15, 1985 (PN 08)

Il Piccolo, April 18, 1985

Residents of Cappucini street in Pordenone noticed numerous inexplicable circular traces on the asphalt, approximately 90 cm in diameter. Antonio Chiumento investigated the site on April 17, 1985, after being alerted by a witness who heard strange noises the previous night. Chiumento found a series of circular and semi-circular traces along the street, from number 3 to the cemetery. The municipal police, upon arrival, stated they had never seen anything like it.

Further Investigation by Chiumento

Chiumento contacted several acquaintances, one of whom suggested the traces might be from street cleaning vehicles. He immediately informed the press and a local radio station. The news was reported the following day, April 18, by "Il Piccolo." No photographs of the traces were taken by Chiumento or the journalists.

Investigation by Neblia and Russo (August 28, 1985)

Massimo Neblia and Edoardo Russo visited the site to take readings and photos. They found two visible traces:

A) An incomplete circular trace, with a maximum diameter of about 60 cm and a minimum of about 50 cm, consisting of a slight incision in the asphalt that appeared lighter. Chiumento noted that at the initial observation, the circumference was complete, with a semi-circumference visible near the sidewalk.

B) Two semi-circular traces, similar in appearance and diameter to the first, but less pronounced. The maximum distance between these two traces was about 1.80 meters. This trace was not photographed due to its low visibility.

"Les sillons" de Brescìa - June 1985

An agriculturalist in Rezzano (BS) discovered strange, notable traces in his cornfield. The traces were characterized by regular indentations in the soil. The exact date of the phenomenon is unknown, but it was present before the previous Wednesday. The traces were described as having a greyish-brown color, with distinct rows of corn plants bent in a particular direction. The investigation involved ufologists from BRESCIA, including Massimo Greco, Marco Morocutti, Antonio Sorlini, Gian Paolo Spassino, and Edoardo Russo, along with Antonio Chiumento. They photographed and filmed the traces, took measurements, and collected samples for chemical analysis.

Description of the Traces:

The traces appeared as furrows in the ground, with the corn plants bent. They were arranged in two groups: one with three arms and another with four arms, forming a near-perfect isosceles triangle. The depth of the furrows varied from 4/5 to 10 centimeters. The edges of the traces were not uniform, sometimes appearing rounded and at other points "cut" or "grooved" vertically, lacking continuity.

Chemical Analysis:

Analyses of samples from the traces revealed a higher concentration of aluminum and magnesium, along with traces of zinc and iron, compared to the surrounding soil. A hypothesis of chemical reduction was proposed. Further analysis by MARCEL DELAVAL at the EURATOM Centre confirmed the presence of aluminum and a small trace of uranium. Radioactivity measurements showed no abnormal signals.

Sivizzano di Traversetolo (Parma) - October 28, 1995

Two brothers, while working in their vineyard, observed an obscure shadow in a nearby cornfield. Initially mistaken for a hunter, the object was later seen hovering and rotating about a meter above the ground. It had an apparent size of 1.70m in height and 1m in diameter, with a shape described as "egg-shaped" or "oval." A car was found stopped nearby, presumably belonging to hunters. The brothers' dog became agitated and ran towards the object. The object then slowly ascended and disappeared towards Quardasone. The object emitted no light or sound.

Case Report: Sivizzano di Traversetolo

According to the report, the object was identified as a plastic balloon by one of the witnesses, Giorgio Pattera, who was with his father. The balloon, described as having a "cowboy" appearance, had partially deflated and was being carried by the wind. The witness stated he observed it ascend into the sky.

"Un enorme disco ha schiacciato il mais: è l'impronta di un Ufo?" (A Huge Disc Crushed the Corn: Is it a UFO Imprint?)

This section discusses a significant event where a large circular geometric figure, 25 meters in diameter, was discovered in a cornfield in the province of Pordenone. The discovery was made by a military pilot on August 7, 1985. The figure had a 2-meter hole in the center and two other smaller holes. The plants within the circle were flattened in a single direction, as if subjected to rotational pressure, and appeared "cooked" rather than burned. Professor Antonio Chiumiento, vice-president of the National Ufological Centre, investigated the site and confirmed the unusual nature of the traces, noting that the field was intact and showed no signs of conventional machinery.

"Alla fiera della magia" (At the Magic Fair)

This article mentions Professor Antonio Chiumiento, vice-president of the National Ufological Centre, presenting his findings on UFOlogy at a fair in Marina di Carrara. He discussed various sightings and documented cases, including the Pordenone incident.

"Un OVNI est-il vraiment descendu à DOMANING" (Did a UFO Really Descend at DOMANING)

This report covers the discovery of a strange, regular circle, approximately 25 meters in diameter, in a cornfield near Domans (San Giorgio della Richinvelda). The circle had a 2-meter inner circle and two other circles of similar dimensions outside the larger one. Ufologists, including Professor Chiumiento, investigated the site. The plants were broken and appeared shriveled, as if subjected to heat. The regularity of the circle and the lack of any signs of passage from a machine led to the hypothesis of a UFO landing.

"IL GAZZETTINO, August 13, 1985"

This article reports on a strange trace photographed from the sky in Zoppola. A military non-commissioned officer, Mario C., 30 years old, serving at the CAMPOFORMIDO airport, observed a circular trace in a cornfield. The trace consisted of a large circle with a diameter of approximately 25 meters, and three smaller points of about 2 meters each, forming a perfect triangle. Upon returning to the ground, the NCO contacted Antonio Chiumiento. The plants in the circle were crushed and appeared dehydrated. The article notes that local farmers excluded atmospheric phenomena or agricultural machinery as causes. It also mentions that numerous observations had been made in the province of Pordenone in the past.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue of Circulare de Blitz revolve around unexplained aerial phenomena (UFOs/UAPs) and the physical evidence they leave behind. The magazine consistently presents witness testimonies, often from credible individuals, alongside the findings of ufological investigations. There is a clear focus on trace evidence, such as circular ground markings and damaged vegetation, which are analyzed for their unusual characteristics. The editorial stance appears to be one of open inquiry, presenting these cases as genuine mysteries that warrant further study, while acknowledging the challenges in definitively identifying the causes. The publication seems to aim at documenting and disseminating information about UFO phenomena within Italy, encouraging public awareness and potentially contributing to a broader understanding of the subject.

This issue of "La Nazione" from Tuesday, August 17, 1985, focuses on unexplained phenomena, particularly mysterious traces found in agricultural fields. The main cover story highlights a large disc-like phenomenon that flattened corn plants, questioning if it was a UFO trace, and an inexplicable geometric figure discovered in Frioul by the air force.

Article: "Un énorme disque a cassé les plants de mais est-ce la trace laissée par OVNI? L'inexplicable figure géométrique découverte dans le Frioul par l'armée de l'air."

This article details an incident where an air force pilot, while flying over a vast agricultural area between Castions di Zoppola and Damanens in the province of Pordenone, discovered a geometric figure in a cornfield. The figure was a circular trace approximately 25 meters in diameter, with a 2-meter diameter "hole" in the center. The plants within the circle were crushed and oriented in the same direction, as if by a rotating movement. Two other smaller traces were found outside the main circle.

Professor Antonio Chiumento, who teaches accounting at a technical-commercial institute in Pordenone and is the vice-president of the National Ufological Center, visited the site. He observed that the plants were crushed in the same direction, appearing "cooked" rather than burned. The plants in the central "hole" and the outer traces were cut at a specific height. Chiumento interviewed local farmers and agricultural cooperatives, who reported no particular work done in that area and no signs of tractors or machinery that could have created the marks. The field itself appeared intact.

Chiumento expressed perplexity, stating that while he had no proof that a faulty water sprinkler wasn't responsible, several factors were inconsistent with this explanation. He noted that the plants showed signs of dehydration, which seemed contradictory to being doused with water. He also pointed out that irrigation sprinklers are typically placed at the edge of fields, not in the center, and that their operation would usually leave a visible track. The arrangement of the three circles also seemed unusual. Chiumento mentioned sending plant samples to Gorizia for analysis.

He also noted a broader trend of increased UFO observations across Italy.

Article: "MESSAGERO VENETO - JEUDI 15 AOUT 1985"

This brief section, referencing a paragraph from another publication, suggests that the ufological hypotheses surrounding the Domanins incident might be the result of a "psychosis." It proposes that a sprinkler rotating at night could have sprayed powerful jets of water, creating the regular circle and misleading UFO enthusiasts, thus resolving the mystery with known physical laws.

Article: "IL GIORNALE D'ITALIA - MARDI 13 AOUT 1985"

This article reports on "close encounters of the third kind" in the province of Pordenone, suggesting that unidentified objects and extraterrestrial beings have been frequenting the area. It mentions ongoing notifications of encounters with "aliens" and UFO sightings by local inhabitants. A photo accompanying the article allegedly shows an imprint left by a presumed flying disc in a cornfield in Domanins.

Article: "MESSAGERO DEL LUNEDI - LUNEDI 19 AGOSTO 1985"

This article reiterates Professor Antonio Chiumento's insistence on the Domanins trace, framing it as one of three strange occurrences facing ufologists. It repeats Chiumento's arguments against the sprinkler theory, emphasizing the dehydration of plants, the unusual placement of sprinklers, and the lack of tracks. He also highlights the resurgence of UFO observations throughout Italy.

Article: "LA GAZZETTA - DOMENICA 11 AGOSTO 1985"

This exclusive report from Pordenone describes another mysterious trace discovered in a cornfield, following a similar incident in Brescia. It states that a UFO landed there. Professor Antonio Chiumento, interviewed in Reggio, acknowledges that while there is no concrete proof of UFOs, many observations cannot be rationally explained.

The article includes a photograph taken by the pilot who first spotted the trace. Chiumento explains that the trace, a circular area about 25 meters in diameter in a cornfield about 3-4 meters high, was difficult to notice from the ground. He describes the interior of the circle as having a 2-meter diameter point, with two other identical points outside, forming an imaginary triangle. In the circle, the corn was broken, with leaves shredded and dehydrated, as if exposed to intense heat. The three outer points had plants cut to a certain height.

An ufologist from Reggio suggests these smaller traces could be landing gear marks. Chiumento urges caution, stating they only observed a trace, not an object, but admits the signs are difficult to explain rationally.

Article: "SOPRALUOGO DEL 27/3/85 4 CASTIONS DI ZOPPOLA - DEROULEMENT DE L'ENQUETE"

This section details an investigation conducted on March 27, 1985, by investigators A. Chiumiento, M. Nebbia, and E. Russo in Castions di Zoppola, where anomalous traces were found on vegetation. They advanced into a cornfield, approximately 4 meters high, following aerial photos. They found a central circular trace and then discovered two more parallel traces, extending about 2 meters, oriented in opposite directions. The plants were bent at the base, with some broken. They noted that the plants were still green, suggesting a recent event. The rows of plants were regularly spaced about 70 cm apart.

Article: "SITUATION GENERALE."

The general situation in the area is described as agricultural, with cornfields extending to the roadside. Human presence is limited to a few scattered houses and dairies. The investigation took place on a sunny day, following summer rains the previous day, leaving the ground damp but compact. The corn plants were in an advanced stage of maturation, with stalks about 3.80 to 4 meters tall and robust.

Article: "DESCRIPTION DES TRACES."

This section provides a detailed description of the traces. The main annular trace (trace 1) is circular, with a variable width from 1 to 7 meters, lacking regularity. Plants in this zone were bent at the root, with varying inclinations, appearing more bent on the inside. The irregularity might be due to the outer plants being bent by the inner ones. The plants were not broken and remained green. The leaves at the edge of the trace were frayed, possibly due to hail. The smaller traces (2, 3, and 4) were similar, about 2 meters long, with plants bent at the base and some broken. The plants were at a similar growth stage to intact ones, indicating a recent event.

Article: "LIBERTA - VENDREDI 9 AOUT 1985 (PAGE 12)"

This article reports on mysterious traces found in a cornfield near Pordenone, as confirmed by Professor Antonio Chiumiento. He stated that the traces were noticed by an air force non-commissioned officer while flying over the area. The plants were not trampled but bent. The article mentions a 25-meter diameter circle with two smaller lateral circles, forming a perfect triangle. In these circles, the plant tops were damaged and broken, with shredded leaves. Chiumento suggested the object that caused the traces did not land.

Article: "L'ECO DI BERGAMO - VENDREDI 9 AOUT 1985"

This notes that the text is the same as "L'ARENA" from the same day.

Article: "Enquête sur le cas de Marliens."

This section discusses the Marliens case, a well-known French UFO incident from 1967 involving traces found in a field. The investigators aimed to gather all relevant documents. They found that the initial hypothesis of a solid case was questionable, describing the material as "plaster" that tended to crumble. The authors caution against being labeled as destabilizers of ufology or rationalists, emphasizing the need for objective and rigorous investigation. They acknowledge that ufology has sometimes been built on weak foundations and that past researchers, while sincere, may have been overly influenced by their hypotheses.

The article then presents arguments against natural explanations for the Marliens traces:

1. Lightning: The traces show no signs of burning, and there was no lightning during the relevant period.
2. Storm: No storm occurred during the period in question.
3. Lightning's inability to create specific furrows: Lightning cannot create the exact type of furrows seen.
4. Powder: A powder found on the traces could be from the deteriorated coating of a spacecraft, similar to that used by the American Columbia shuttle (silicone-based).
5. "Anchoring holes": The presence of these holes suggests a manufactured object.
6. OVNI sighting: A UFO was reportedly sighted and tracked by radar at the time of the alleged landing.

The article then re-examines these arguments:

1. Lightning's effects: Lightning can have mysterious effects, including "cold lightning" that is too brief to cause ignition but can destroy objects. It can also cause objects to be destroyed explosively without burning.
2. Storm error: The trace was discovered on May 5th, but a strong storm occurred on May 3rd. The article acknowledges a potential error in the investigation regarding the timing of the storm.
3. Lightning and furrows: Lightning can strike metallic objects, houses, lawns, and plowed fields, creating holes and furrows, including galleries called fulgurites in sandy terrain.
4. Powder and furrows: The powder was found *after* the furrows were opened, suggesting it was inside them, not dispersed on the ground.
5. Anchoring holes: Similar to the powder, these were discovered after the furrows were opened.
6. OVNI radar sighting: The article questions the correlation between a radar sighting at Creil (vertical of Pontoise) on May 10th and the traces found on May 5th.

Despite the arguments, the article concludes that the hypothesis of lightning is the most probable explanation for the Marliens case. It cites an 1897 case in the Haut-Jura where a lightning strike created a detailed description of a furrowed soil pattern. The absence of burning or calcination, the presence of furrows resembling a "spider," and the comparison to the Marliens case lead to this conclusion. The authors suggest that Marliens was likely caused by ball lightning, not a UFO landing.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring theme in this issue is the investigation of unexplained phenomena, particularly mysterious traces found in fields and on asphalt. The magazine presents multiple reports and analyses of such events, with a strong focus on the Domanins and Marliens cases. While acknowledging the existence of unexplained observations, the editorial stance, particularly through the contributions of Professor Antonio Chiumento and the analysis of the Marliens case, leans towards rational explanations, even if they are unusual natural phenomena like ball lightning, rather than definitively concluding UFO involvement without concrete proof. There is a clear emphasis on rigorous investigation and caution against jumping to conclusions based solely on initial observations or past ufological narratives.

This document, from Vimana magazine issue 21, details the historical UFO/UAP case of Poncey-sur-l'Ignon in 1954. The article aims to provide a more complete account than previous publications, highlighting the case's solidity and significance for the region.

Historical Context

The case of Poncey-sur-l'Ignon is presented as a significant event, particularly in the context of the "great Martian fear" period. Despite being overlooked in some earlier works, it is considered one of the most robust and interesting cases from the department. The article notes that over thirty years have passed, yet the traces of the event remain an enigma. It also points out that there were actually two "Poncey affairs," with the first occurring 48 hours before the main "landing" event, and that this case resisted the "concrete case" criteria set by Michel Figuet.

The events took place in October 1954, during a wave of UFO sightings in France, with the Côte d'Or region not being an exception. The article promises to reveal the regional press coverage from this "historically ufological" month.

Locations

The article provides detailed geographical information for locating the incident. It describes a route starting from Dijon, heading towards Châtillon-sur-Seine/Troyes, and then to the village of Saint-Seine-l'Abbaye. From there, a winding road leads to a plateau where the village of Poncey-sur-l'Ignon is situated. Approximately 1.5 km outside the village, in a secluded valley near an asbestos factory, the landing is said to have occurred. The source of the Ignon river is also mentioned as a nearby scenic spot.

A map of the region is included, showing various towns and roads, with Poncey-sur-l'Ignon marked.

The First Case (October 8, 1954)

This observation occurred on the outskirts of the village. Mme Guainait, the primary witness, was milking her cows in her stable around 7:40 PM when her dogs became agitated and fled to her, showing extreme fear. She noticed a moon-like glow, which she initially mistook for an unusual moon. The dogs' barking directed her attention to the woods, where she saw a curious "lune" (moon) that she later described as a "gas-oil drum" – a cylinder with horizontal bases.

Estimates of the object's size varied: the gendarmerie estimated it at 15 meters in diameter and 1.5 meters in length, while M. Tyrode later estimated it at 15 meters in diameter and 30 meters in height. The object was illuminated over its entire surface, emitting a green reflection (though Mme Guainait also mentioned other colors). It moved horizontally towards the woods at a slow speed, comparable to a simple airplane. Mme Guainait called her husband and daughter, and their neighbor, Mme Mugneret, also witnessed the event.

The observation lasted about 5 minutes. The husband, arriving late, only saw the end of the event and described a luminous ball, like a football, without noise. The light was described as similar to an electric bulb but more orange. Mme Mugneret confirmed seeing an orange ball moving slowly and without noise. The witness's daughter also corroborated the description. The article emphasizes the psychological impact of this event on the village and the reaction of the dogs.

Investigation and Corroboration (First Case)

Investigators noted that no trace was found on the ground. The gendarmerie only became aware of the first case after the second incident. Mme Guainait affirmed that the gendarmes visited the day after her "strange story," but they seemed to conduct a routine check. A counter-enquiry in 1982 confirmed that the witnesses, except for the deceased M. Guainait, largely maintained their original accounts, with Mme Guainait expressing some bitterness about being perceived as foolish.

The article contrasts these accounts with alleged "barstool information" from Barthel and Brucker, suggesting the Poncey case is genuine.

Witnesses in Pellerey

Some books mention people in Pellerey (a village near Poncey) reporting a similar observation, with dogs being disturbed by vibrations and humans affected by the phenomenon. However, these accounts are described as imprecise and difficult to verify. The article states that these specific witnesses could not be found, although an article in "La Bourgogne Républicaine" mentioned a M. Boucherot from Pellerey, who had since passed away.

The Second Case (October 10, 1954)

This event occurred 48 hours after the first, on a Monday evening around 7:30 PM. Madame Yvette Fourneret, living in a house next to the asbestos factory, was about to close her shutters when she saw a luminous object in the sky, less than 50 meters away and at a height of about 40 meters, and at most 20 meters away horizontally. She described it as a "globe transparent" illuminated from within, with green and orange reflections, and no visible flame or projection like a lighthouse. It made no noise.

Her husband was out, and her father-in-law, who was blind, was present but unable to help. Mme Fourneret, holding her 18-month-old baby, fled behind the house and took refuge with her neighbor, Mme Bouiller. Mme Bouiller's house was partially obscured by the factory buildings. Mme Bouiller's daughter, Yvette, was also present and corroborated Mme Fourneret's statement to the gendarmerie that she was too frightened to speak. The dog in Mme Bouiller's house did not react.

Mme Fourneret described the object's shape as potentially resembling a mushroom with a round base, though a sketch made 30 years later differed significantly. The size was estimated imprecisely as "the size of a stove" by the gendarmerie, while Charles Garreau estimated its length at 3 meters, and M. Tyrode, 20 years later, estimated its height and length at 10 meters.

The Trace

Following the second sighting, M. Jacky Girardot and M. Bernard Bouiller (Mme Bouiller's son) went to investigate. Initially skeptical, they discovered a strange trace in the field opposite Mme Fourneret's house, near a plum tree. This trace was described as an enormous suction, with the earth removed in a way that the bottom of the cavity was wider than the top. The earth appeared to have been recently disturbed. Earthworms were present, and some authors noted their presence. The gendarmerie of Saint-Seine-l'Abbaye later described the trace precisely: a trapezoidal shape 1.5 meters long with small bases of 0.5 to 0.6 meters, almost rectangular. The sides were not parallel, with a slight inward curvature. The earth and grass were apparently sucked up to a depth of 5 to 8 centimeters. The bottom of the excavation was clear, and long roots of dandelions and chicory, along with grass roots, remained in place, protruding and overhanging the void.

On the side of the small bases, a fine powder of earth was observed, and on a 8-meter circle, clods of earth about 30 centimeters in diameter were found, arranged regularly and all turned upside down, with the grass underneath.

Further Investigation and Third Sighting

Numerous authorities, including the gendarmerie, the air police, intelligence services, journalists, and ufologists, investigated the trace. Charles Garreau examined the earth clods and sent samples to Aimé Michel for analysis, but no concrete results were obtained. No radioactivity or burn marks were detected. The gendarmerie report indicated that no human or animal had been in the field during the day or evening, suggesting the trace was not made by conventional tools. It was noted that the grass did not grow back in that spot for four years.

A third sighting was reported by François Bouiller, the 18-year-old son of Mme Bouiller, who worked for the village mayor. At 8:45 PM, he saw a "large cigar, like an airplane fuselage, but without wings," entirely luminous, with a transparent-like color and green and orange reflections. He estimated its altitude at about 1000 meters and its width similar to a jet plane. He estimated its speed to be double that of such an aircraft. Aimé Michel suggested a southeast direction, while the gendarmerie indicated north-south. François Bouiller arrived at his parents' house at 9:30 PM, visibly impressed and pale.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The article consistently emphasizes the solidity and significance of the Poncey-sur-l'Ignon case, contrasting it with less credible accounts. The detailed witness testimonies, corroboration from multiple sources (including animal reactions), and the discovery of a physical trace lend weight to the events. The editorial stance appears to favor the authenticity of the sightings, presenting the information as factual and investigative, while acknowledging the enduring mystery and the challenges of definitive proof. The recurring theme is the unexplained nature of the phenomena and the persistent efforts to understand them, despite the passage of time and initial skepticism.

This issue of "L'OMBRE DU CANULAR" (The Shadow of the Hoax) delves into a specific UFO sighting that occurred in Poncey-sur-l'Ignon, France, on October 4, 1954. The article, presented as an investigation, questions whether the event was a genuine encounter or a carefully orchestrated prank.

The Poncey-sur-l'Ignon Incident

The central focus is the testimony of Mme Thérèse Fourneret, a 23-year-old woman who reported seeing a luminous, yellow-orange object, estimated to be about 8 meters in diameter, hovering and descending in a field near her home. She described it as a 'cigar' shape and noted its slow movement. The object reportedly stayed for about an hour, and upon investigation, distinct trapezoidal ground traces were found, measuring 1.50 meters in height and with sides of irregular length, 0.50 meters at the small base and 0.70 meters at the large base. The earth was disturbed, with clumps of soil resembling a spray of water, and a deep-rooted plant remained standing in the center.

The Hoax Hypothesis

The article strongly leans towards the possibility of a hoax. It highlights that the incident occurred during a period of widespread UFO sightings in 1954, suggesting a potential for public hysteria or deliberate deception. The investigators, including M. Tyrode, focus on two local individuals: Bernard Bouiller, Mme Fourneret's son, and Jacky Girardot, her son-in-law, who was on leave from the military. Their movements on the evening of the sighting are meticulously reconstructed. They were reportedly at a café until 7:55 PM, then visited the mayor, and arrived at Mme Bouiller's house (Mme Fourneret's neighbor and possibly mother) at 8:30 PM, allegedly intending to 'scare the women' by talking about a landed saucer. However, the timeline presented by M. Tyrode's investigation suggests they may not have had sufficient time to execute such a prank, especially considering the café owner's testimony, which would have proven their presence there until 7:55 PM. The article questions why the alleged perpetrators would have left the 'saucer' illuminated and why they would have created such specific, trapezoidal traces, which do not align with the common understanding of disc-shaped UFOs. It also notes that no evidence of digging was found.

Witness Corroboration and Other Sightings

While Mme Fourneret was initially alone, her neighbor, Mme Bouiller, joined her. Later, two neighbors, MM. Girardot and Vincent, arrived and armed themselves with rifles to investigate. Another witness, François Bouiller (an 18-year-old), reported seeing a cigar-shaped object ascending into the sky with a yellow-green hue, describing it as a 'fuselage without wings.' The article also mentions other sightings from the same period, including reports from the Jura region, Perpignan, La Rochelle, Melun, Montpellier, and even Côte d'Ivoire. A separate account details a sighting by M. and Mme Guainet, who observed a luminous, cylindrical object moving vertically at low altitude near a wood. They were initially skeptical but became convinced of its extraordinary nature.

Astronomical Data

Pages dedicated to astronomical data provide precise coordinates and times for the moon's position on October 4 and 2 October 1954, for Poncey-sur-l'Ignon. This information, along with meteorological data for the period, appears to be included to provide a scientific context or to rule out natural explanations for the sightings.

Conclusion

The article concludes that the case of Poncey-sur-l'Ignon remains a mystery, despite the strong evidence pointing towards a hoax. The investigators acknowledge that if it wasn't a prank, it was something else entirely, leaving the possibility of an unknown phenomenon open.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring theme is the ambiguity between genuine UFO sightings and elaborate hoaxes, a common debate in the field of ufology. The editorial stance appears to be one of critical inquiry, meticulously examining witness accounts, timelines, and physical evidence to uncover the truth, while acknowledging the limitations of definitive conclusions. The article emphasizes the psychological and social context of such events, including the influence of widespread media coverage of UFOs and local community dynamics.

This document is an excerpt from the French newspaper LE BIEN PUBLIC, dated October 7, 1954, with a focus on UFO sightings. It details two mysterious aerial phenomena observed in Poncey-sur-l'Ignon, France, in early October 1954. The issue also includes astronomical data and references other related cases and publications.

Two Mysterious Engines Sighted in Poncey-sur-l'Ignon

The main article, "DEUX MYSTÉRIEUX ENGINS APERÇUS A PONCEY-SUR-L'IGNON" (Two Mysterious Engines Sighted in Poncey-sur-l'Ignon), reports on events that occurred on October 2nd and October 4th, 1954. The article poses questions about whether a 'flying saucer' haunted the skies of Poncey-sur-l'Ignon and attempted to land in a field near the asbestos factory. Numerous witnesses claim to have seen something, and the newspaper leaves the conclusion to the readers.

The First Sighting: An Orange Cylinder with a Green Halo

On Saturday, October 2, 1954, around 7:40 PM, Mme Gainalt, wife of the former mayor, reported seeing a mysterious object. She described it as a "cylindrical object, orange, surrounded by a square of pale green light." She called her husband, their daughter Yvette, and a neighbor, Mme Mugneret, to witness the object. They observed the cylinder moving "above the small wood, about a kilometer away." The sighting lasted about ten minutes before the object disappeared "at the speed of a large airplane, silently, in the direction of Chanceaux."

The article includes astronomical data tables for the planets and the moon for specific dates and times around the reported sightings. For instance, on Saturday, October 2, 1954, at 18h 40mn (TU), the coordinates for the Moon are listed, along with the local time being 19h 49mn. Another table provides data for Saturday, October 2, 1954, at 19h 40mn (TU), with local time at 19h 59mn. A third set of data is for Monday, October 4, 1954, at 18h 00mn (TU), with local time at 18h 19mn.

Traces Left Behind

The article "Des traces étranges relevées dans un pré" (Strange traces found in a meadow) details the physical evidence. The traces were described as enormous, shaped like a keyhole, 40 feet long and 20 feet wide. The grass and roots appeared to have been "sucked up as if by a giant vacuum cleaner."

Related Cases and Publications

Further information is provided in the "BIBLIOGRAPHIE" (Bibliography) section, which lists various sources, including:

• A police report from the Gendarmerie of St Seine l'Abbaye regarding an investigation on October 6th concerning the appearance of an unidentified craft.
• Investigations by J. Tyrode, transmitted by M. F. Lagarde.
• Articles from "Le Bien Public," "Dépêches," and "Radar" from 1954.
• Publications like "Flying Saucer Review" (May 1958, special issue on "the humanoids"; May-June 1972, vol 18, no. 13).
• Other documents and dossiers related to UFOs in France.

The Woodmandsterne Case (England, 1968)

An excerpt from "Flying Saucer Review" (vol 18, no. 3, May-June 1972) details a case from Woodmandsterne, Banstead, England, in late August or early September 1968. Farmer Georges Graham was hunting when he saw a "dark blue incandescent object resembling a flame of acetylene" about 100 yards away in a field. Fifteen minutes later, he heard a "whoosh" and saw a dark circular shape ascend rapidly and disappear. The next day, a large, keyhole-shaped trace, 40 feet long and 20 feet wide, was found. The grass and roots were described as having been sucked up. Notably, 20 horses and 70-80 other cattle in the field were apparently undisturbed by the object, which the witness described as being "even taller than a double-decker bus."

More curiously, a week later, two children guarding horses saw a strange object in the field. The dogs with them fled, refusing to enter the field, and were later found waiting at the bus stop.

Astronomical Data

The document includes detailed tables of celestial coordinates for the Moon and planets. These tables provide precise data such as longitude, latitude, ascension, declination, azimuth, altitude, distance, horary angle, parallax, and times of moonrise and moonset for specific dates and locations, including Poncey-sur-l'Ignon.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring theme is the reporting of unexplained aerial phenomena and the physical traces they leave. The newspaper adopts a neutral stance, presenting witness testimonies and factual data (like astronomical coordinates and trace descriptions) while inviting readers to draw their own conclusions. The inclusion of a bibliography suggests an effort to connect these events to a broader context of UFO research and literature. The comparison of the Poncey case with other incidents, like the one in Woodmandsterne, indicates an interest in identifying patterns and similarities in UFO reports.

This issue of "LA BOURGOGNE RÉPUBLICAINE" from October 4, 1954, features a prominent article about a mysterious aerial phenomenon, with the cover headline "UN ENGIN mystérieux" (A Mysterious Craft).

The Poncey-sur-l'Ignon Incident

The main focus is on an event that occurred in Poncey-sur-l'Ignon on October 4, 1954. A housewife, Mme Thérèse Fourneret, reported witnessing a luminous, orange, circular object, approximately three meters in diameter, descend and land near her farm. The object reportedly swung in mid-air before landing. When neighbors arrived, they discovered that a quadrilateral area of earth, about one square meter, had been 'sucked up' in such a way that a hoax was ruled out. The earth around the imprint was described as being 'as if sucked up under the grass.' The incident prompted extensive research and analysis by the police and the French air force, but the object and the traces it left remained unexplained.

Mme Yvette Fourneret, likely the same witness, is quoted recalling the event: "En fermant les volets, j'ai vu une forme lumineuse, orange, arriver sans bruit. Effrayée, j'ai pris mon bébé et je suis partie chez la voisine." The article notes that for several years, the affected patch of ground remained devoid of vegetation.

Related Incidents and Investigations

The issue also references similar events and investigations:

• Brazey-en-Morvan: Observations of a luminous object and unusual phenomena were reported in 1954, with traces left behind. The article mentions a specific incident on June 26, 1967, where M. Michot-Rousseau observed an object and later explained it to M. Tyrede.
• Montallery: Two months after an incident in Mareuil-sur-Belle, a similar, though not identical, spectacular event occurred in Montallery. A farmer, M. Andris Chevalier, discovered a field of corn that had been strangely flattened. The damage covered an area of approximately 23 square meters, with corn stalks bent and some projected several meters away. The ground in the center was depressed, and there were traces of a greyish powder on some clods of earth. The article discusses various hypotheses, including lightning, a whirlwind, or an explosion, but notes the absence of debris and the peculiar nature of the traces.
• M. Bertrand Méheust's Involvement: A member of the publication, M. Bertrand Méheust, investigated the Montallery incident. He noted that while lightning seemed a plausible explanation, the traces—particularly the central depression and mauve powder—recalled the phenomenon at Marliens, which he had personally witnessed. He collected samples of earth, powder-coated clods, and corn stalks for analysis.
• GEPAN Correspondence: A letter from Alain Esterle, Chief of the Group for the Study of Unidentified Aerospace Phenomena (GEPAN) at the Centre National d'Études Spatiales (CNES) in Toulouse, dated November 25, 1982, is included. Addressed to Monsieur Patrice Vachon, the letter states that GEPAN does not possess any documents concerning the cited case (presumably Poncey-sur-l'Ignon) and cannot provide them due to archival regulations, as Gendarmerie reports are considered national archives and are not publicly accessible for 60 years.

Other Mentions

The issue also briefly mentions political news concerning M. Mendes-France, Baranes, Mam Dastier, and Ducloss, as well as other news items like "Suicide" and "A MORT DEMANDEE CONTRE OBERG ET KNOCHEN."

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring theme is the investigation and reporting of unexplained aerial phenomena (UAP/OVNI) in France during the mid-20th century. The publication appears to be dedicated to documenting such events, presenting witness accounts, and detailing the findings of investigations, while acknowledging the difficulty in definitively explaining many of them. The editorial stance seems to be one of serious inquiry into these phenomena, presenting them to the public with a degree of skepticism but also with an open mind to the possibility of extraordinary explanations beyond conventional ones like weather events.

This document, likely an issue of "Phénomènes Spatiaux" (issue number 12 is referenced), details investigations into unexplained phenomena occurring in French agricultural fields, specifically cornfields, during the 1970s. The primary focus is on two cases: Mareuil-sur-Belle and Montallery. The magazine explores potential causes, comparing them to a previous incident in Marliens and considering explanations ranging from natural phenomena like lightning to more speculative theories involving extraterrestrial activity.

Mareuil-sur-Belle Case

The phenomenon at Mareuil-sur-Belle presented itself as a depression in a cornfield. The corn stalks within and around this depression were described as shredded and desiccated, with some being riddled by small stones, as if struck by a razor. The stalks were sometimes cut cleanly. The central depression itself was described as a hole approximately 1.5 meters in diameter and 0.3 meters deep, partially filled with earth, some of which weighed several kilos. The stalks in the affected area exhibited a certain symmetry in their damage. Additionally, furrows were observed on the otherwise smooth field surface, which appeared to have calcined or uprooted the corn plants. These furrows were not directly connected to the central hole but were sometimes several meters away. The fallen or calcined corn ears were marked on a diagram (Figure 1), with arrows indicating the direction of their fall. Inside the fractures on the soil surface, a mauve powder was found, similar to that observed in Marliens.

Montallery Case

The Montallery case, located near Auxerre, shared similarities with Mareuil. The corn stalks were described as shredded and desiccated, with some riddled by small stones. A central depression was noted, from which a half-cubic meter of earth was apparently removed. Clods of earth weighing up to five kilos were projected considerable distances. The stalks were sometimes cut cleanly, and the leaves were described as brittle like parchment. The furrows observed in this case also suggested calcination or uprooting of the plants. The damage exhibited a degree of symmetry. A distinctive mauve powder was also found in the fractures on the soil surface.

Analysis and Explanations

The article discusses the difficulties in definitively explaining these phenomena. Lightning was considered, especially due to the furrows, but several factors argued against it. Notably, in both Mareuil and Montallery, there was no record of thunderstorms in the area during the relevant periods. The intensity of the effects (e.g., the volume of earth displaced, the projection of clods) suggested a powerful event, yet there was no evidence of fusion or vitrification of the soil, which would be expected from a powerful lightning strike. The presence of small stones riddling the stalks also seemed unusual for a lightning strike.

The article also mentions that the damage to the corn stalks did not correspond to the total number of stalks that would have been present in the affected area, suggesting a significant loss or destruction. The authors express a desire to rule out unjustified speculation about lightning and to scientifically document these phenomena, which have prompted farmers to report them to authorities.

Comparisons are drawn to the Marliens case, where a mauve powder was also observed. The article notes that the powder from Marliens was difficult to analyze due to its scarcity and crystalline, hard nature. The APRO (Association for the Study of Anomalous Phenomena) had reportedly studied samples of a similar powder.

Further Investigations and Expert Opinions

The article references an investigation by the gendarmerie in both Mareuil and Montallery. It also touches upon similar incidents in the USA that led to controversy. The absence of lightning signals in the region, even from meteorological stations and radar, further complicates the lightning hypothesis. The possibility of a meteorite impact was dismissed as insufficient to explain the observed traces.

A significant point raised is the nature of the powder found. In the context of the Iowa case, Dr. Walter W. Walker, an expert in fulgurites (formations resulting from lightning strikes on soil), concluded that the silvery or whitish dust found in craters was not caused by lightning. His analysis of the dust showed it to be fundamentally similar to the surrounding earth, leading him to deduce that intense, sudden heat had consumed organic soil components, leaving the powder as a residue. He suggested that the color of the powder could vary depending on the soil type and fertilizers used.

Conclusion and Future Research

As of the writing of this article, no definitive conclusion had been reached, but the lightning explanation appeared to be losing ground. The authors express their intention to continue their study and report further findings. They extend their thanks to various individuals and organizations for their contributions to the investigation, including Colonel Berton, M. Bertrand Meheust, M. Jean-Claude Baillon, M. Jean Cerles, and Gérard Nicoulaud.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around unexplained ground phenomena, particularly in agricultural settings, and the scientific investigation of such events. The editorial stance appears to be one of cautious inquiry, seeking to provide factual accounts and explore various explanations, while acknowledging the limitations of current knowledge and the possibility of unconventional causes. The magazine seems committed to documenting these events, even if they challenge conventional scientific understanding, and to distinguishing between established phenomena like lightning and more mysterious occurrences. The comparison to the Marliens case and the mention of extraterrestrial intervention suggest an openness to a broader range of possibilities within the scope of anomalous phenomena research.