Vimana 21 - No 19 - special Le Petit Homme de Reneve - 2eme trim 1985

Magazine Overview

Vimana 21: LE MAGAZINE DE LA COTE D OR INSOLITE

Vimana 21 is the 19th issue of a quarterly bulletin published by A.D.R.U.P. (Association Dijonnaise de Recherches Ufologiques et Parapsychologiques). The cover prominently features a striking illustration and the headline: "40 ANS APRÈS... LE MYSTÈRE DU PETIT HOMME DE 17cm EST-IL ENFIN RÉSOLU ?" (40 YEARS LATER... IS THE MYSTERY OF THE 17cm LITTLE MAN FINALLY SOLVED?). The magazine is priced at 10 F and is edited by A.D.R.U.P., a non-profit association. The issue is dated "199" which, in context with the article on page 10 discussing a 30-year gap since the event, likely refers to 1975.

Editorial and Staff

The editorial section (page 4) identifies the publication as a bulletin of A.D.R.U.P., an association compliant with the law of July 1, 1901, and a member of the F.F.U. (Fédération Française d'Ufologie). The responsible individuals are listed as Martine Geoffroy (President), Jean-Claude Calmettes (Vice-President), Patrice Vachon (Treasurer and Enquête), Jocelyne Vachon (Secretary), and Patrick Geoffroy (Para/contactés). The editorial emphasizes that Vimana 21 is the work of all association members, who form the editorial committee, and that collaboration from researchers and readers is highly valued. Reproduction of articles is permitted with clear source attribution.

Subscription and Membership

Subscription and membership details are provided on page 4. Active members pay 13 C F, supporting members pay 13 C F and more, and subscriptions cost 50 F. Correspondence should be addressed to the secretariat at A.D.R.U.P., 6, rue des Gémeaux, 2122 GEVREY CHAMBERTIN. A note clarifies that article reproductions require prior authorization from the journal's bureau, and that the documents inserted are under the authors' responsibility, with insertion not implying ADRUP's endorsement.

Table of Contents (Sommaire)

The table of contents on page 5 outlines the issue's articles:

• HISTORIQUE DU VILLAGE (History of the Village)
• LE CURE ET UN CERTAIN REGIMENT (The Priest and a Certain Regiment)
• OBSERVATION DU CURE (The Priest's Observation)
• L'ENQUETE GEPA (The GEPA Investigation)
• L'ENTRETIEN A PARIS (The Interview in Paris)
• CRITIQUE DE L'ENQUETE (Critique of the Investigation)
• PRESENTATION DE LA CONTRE ENQUETE (Presentation of the Counter-Investigation)
• LA CONTRE ENQUETE ADRUP (The ADRUP Counter-Investigation)
• APPENDICE : CAS ANALOGUE (Appendix: Analogous Case)

Historical Background of Renève

Page 6 delves into the "HISTORIQUE DU VILLAGE" (History of the Village). Renève is described as a charming town of 389 inhabitants, located 6 km from Mirebeau, bordering the Haute Saône and near the Jura. It was historically influenced by Roman civilization and was a site of Merovingian rivalries. In 1636, it suffered destruction but was revived 150 years later with the restoration of its church, attracting nearly 900 souls. The early 20th century saw the creation of the Marne-Saône canal, leading to economic growth, particularly at the Moulin de la Roye, which processed fava beans imported from Egypt or the Levant. This mill, one of three in France, operated day and night. The article also touches upon the famous "affaire Brunehaut" (Brunehaut affair), involving a Visigothic princess and her conflict with Fredegonde, queen of Neustrie. It mentions Clotaire II, Fredegonde's son, camping near Renève and the alleged brutal death of Brunehaut. The village's proximity to Cheuge is noted, with Cheuge claiming the site of Brunehaut's torture is within its territory, known as "Le Purgatoire."

The Priest and a Certain Regiment

Pages 7 and 8 focus on "LE CURE ET UN CERTAIN REGIMENT" (The Priest and a Certain Regiment). The central figure is "l'Abbé X," born in 1906 in the Haut Rhin, who studied at the Flavigny seminary and was ordained in 1934 in the diocese of Dijon. He served in Renève from 1937 to 1947. Described as a stern, solid, and authoritarian man with Alsatian origins, he was respected by his parishioners. He maintained traditional practices, such as separating boys and girls during mass. His life in Renève was peaceful until the liberation of Dijon on September 11, 1944. The article notes that April 1944 saw the formation of CTA n° 154, an air force transport regiment from Mouzaiaville, Algeria. This regiment, after operations in Algeria, traveled to France, landing in St Raphaël on August 15, 1944. The CTA 154 then moved through Toulon, Marseille, Aubagne, Orange, and up the Rhône valley, eventually settling in Renève at the Moulin de la Roye. The mill, disused since 1914, had previously been occupied by German troops and was now used by Allied troops as a staging post. A special midnight mass was held on Christmas 1944, attended by both soldiers and villagers. Normally, the soldiers remained isolated, with rare contact with locals, except for occasional Sunday meals or clandestine dances. Other regiments passing through the mill maintained strict discipline, limiting contact even among themselves. The article concludes this section with "ET POURTANT, LA VIE CONTINUE" (AND YET, LIFE GOES ON), mentioning the priest's decision to go mushroom picking in April 1945.

The Moulin de la Roye

Page 9 features a photograph of "RENÈVE. - Le Moulin de la Roye" (Renève. - The Roye Mill), showing the building and its surroundings, with two circular stamps overlaid on the image.

The 17cm Man Encounter

Page 10, titled "« Un homme de 17 cm de haut »... 30 ans après, le curé de Pagny révèle sa rencontre insolite" (A Man 17 cm Tall... 30 Years Later, the Priest of Pagny Reveals His Unusual Encounter), details the priest's account. The priest, now serving in Pagny-la-Ville, recounts an event from April 15, 1945, near Renève. While searching for mushrooms in a thicket, he encountered a "petit bonhomme" (little man) approximately 17 cm tall. The figure was described as robust, healthy, with a ruddy face, full cheeks, and a beard, wearing a dark red, flexible suit that covered his entire body except for his head. The priest noted the figure's haste and apparent fear. He had the impulse to capture the being but refrained, fearing injury from his mushroom-gathering tool. The small man disappeared into the undergrowth. The priest expressed regret for not being able to communicate with the being and obtain information. He considered the encounter significant for understanding life forms in the universe and their adaptation to Earth conditions. The article includes a drawing of the "PETIT BONHOMME DE RENEVE" (Little Man of Renève) by the priest. The GEPA (Groupement d'Etude de Phénomènes Aériens et Objets Spatiaux Insolites) is mentioned as having investigated the case, with its director, René Fauéré, noting that if the humanoid was 17 cm tall, it would have weighed approximately 70 grams. The article concludes by stating that the priest waited 30 years to share his story due to its extraordinary nature and his moral obligation to report it to a scientific society, acknowledging that such extraordinary accounts are not uncommon today and urging respect for the priest's testimony.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue of Vimana 21 strongly focuses on a specific, long-held mystery involving a close encounter with a small humanoid. The magazine positions itself as a platform for investigating and disseminating information on ufological and parapsychological phenomena. The editorial stance appears to be one of serious inquiry into unexplained events, encouraging reader and researcher collaboration. The inclusion of historical context for the location and the mention of the GEPA investigation suggest a methodical approach to analyzing such cases. The magazine aims to present extraordinary accounts, like the priest's testimony, with a degree of scientific rigor and encourages open-mindedness from its readership.

This document is an excerpt from the French regional newspaper "Les Dépêches," specifically an article from March 1976, detailing a peculiar encounter reported by a country priest. The article focuses on the GEPA's (Groupement d'Etudes des Phénomènes aériens) investigation into a sighting of a 17 cm tall humanoid.

The Renève Case: A 17 cm Tall Man

The article begins by addressing a previous publication in "Les Dépêches" on March 5th, titled "Un homme de 17 cm de haut... 30 ans après, le curé de Pagny révèle sa rencontre insolite." The GEPA clarifies that passages quoted in the article, concerning "petit bonhomme de Renève," and the accompanying photograph, originated from issue no. 45 of the review "Phénomènes Spatiaux." They assert copyright protection for these materials and reserve the right to pursue legal action against any unauthorized reproduction. The GEPA also states that they assume full responsibility for disclosing the witness's name and address, which the witness requested not be made public. The witness further indicated a desire to make no further comments and not to receive correspondence or visits related to the affair.

Readers who have witnessed unusual events are invited to send an account to Henry Jean Besset at 195, rue de Mirande in Dijon.

The Encounter: A Priest's Testimony

Page 2 presents the detailed account of the encounter, an investigation by Henry-Jean Besset for GEPA in September 1975. The witness, a country priest, recounts an event from April 1945. While gathering mushrooms near Renève, he spotted a small, 15-17 cm tall figure moving quickly. The figure appeared out of breath and scared but did not slow down as it passed about 30 cm from the priest, looking at him intently. The priest considered trying to capture the figure but hesitated, fearing he might injure it with a "pique" or "tige" (a pointed object) extending from its back, which was about 2 cm longer than its head. The figure then disappeared into a thicket. The priest expressed regret for not being able to intercept it and obtain information. The following day, he intended to return to the site with tools to search for traces or any belonging of the figure, but persistent bad weather prevented this.

The Small Man: A Detailed Description

Page 4 provides a more detailed description of the humanoid. The priest described it as a "man in reduction," about 70-75 years old, healthy, robust, with gray hair and a sparse beard. He observed two eyes, two ears, and a mouth, though the mouth remained closed. The figure's face was expressive, showing signs of breathlessness and fear. All body parts were proportionally similar to a human's, but in miniature. The figure was clad in a dark bordeaux, matte, flexible suit that covered its entire body, including hands and feet, with only the head exposed. The suit had mitten-like coverings for the hands, and the feet were encased in boots. The priest did not recall any buttons or a belt. He speculated the suit was made of rubber or plastic. Most peculiar was a "pique" on its right side, extending about 2 cm above its head, which widened slightly before entering the suit and extending down to the heel, slightly hindering its gait. This "pique" was described as a thin rod, like a thorn, with no orifice at its tip, which was a dirty cream color.

The figure approached the priest quickly, appearing hurried and oppressed, seemingly fearful yet curious. It stopped about 30 cm away and stared at the priest, perhaps wondering about his presence and attire. After passing, it did not look back and vanished into the dense thicket. The priest was disappointed not to have made contact or obtained information. During the encounter, the figure made no sound, either speaking or moving, and left no trace. The priest attributed the lack of sound and traces to the figure's low weight and the compact, dry soil, and he did not detect any particular odor.

GEPA's Investigation and Context

Page 5 explains that the GEPA obtained this account from a country priest, described as alert, lucid, composed, and enthusiastic. The events occurred around April 20, 1945, on a path connecting Renève (Côte d'Or) and Poyans (Haute-Saône). The landscape has since changed due to land consolidation, but the path and woods remain. The priest was able to pinpoint the exact location of the thicket from 1945. The text also introduces the GEPA, founded in late 1962, presided over by General Lionel Max Chassin and later René Fouéré. This Parisian organization, publisher of "Phénomène Spaciaux," was a respected authority on UFOs, known for its objective and scientific investigations.

Henry Jean Besset, the GEPA's correspondent from Dijon, reported the initial findings of the investigation.

Interview in Paris

Page 6 details a follow-up meeting organized by GEPA in Paris with the witness. During the events in 1945, the priest admitted being influenced by Abbé Moreux's writings on human origins and evolution. This initial interpretation led him to abandon further investigation. Thirty years later, he felt relieved to be heard with consideration, believing his observation held significant scientific value. Despite the brief encounter (about 20 seconds), the priest noted the figure's fear, breathlessness, and the closed mouth. He also observed a resemblance to an extraterrestrial described in Jader Pereira's files. He stated that if he had seen a flying object nearby, his conclusion would have been different, and he would have alerted the gendarmerie. He experienced no heat sensation and perceived no odor. While the figure showed no hostility, the priest feared being injured by its "pique," which reminded him of poisoned arrows from adventure novels. He regretted not being able to detain the figure but felt he had presented a friendly image of the human species. He remained firm that the observation was material and not supernatural or robotic. Following the interview analysis, Monsieur Fouéré concluded the hypothesis of an extraterrestrial origin.

Reconstitution and Comparisons

Page 7 includes a "Reconstitution de l'observation (Document GEPA)" which appears to be an illustration of the priest kneeling in a natural setting. Below this, a "Dessin du petit homme" is presented, followed by "Tiré du fichier de Jader Pereira - Ressemblance noté par l'Abbé X," showing a drawing of a small, bald humanoid figure next to a larger, bald head.

Critique of the Investigation

Page 8 presents a critique of the GEPA's investigation by ADRUP. ADRUP expresses respect for GEPA's honesty and work but disapproves of their "hasty and fragile" conclusion, calling the reasoning "simplistic." ADRUP questions the GEPA's assertion that the small humanoid, with its clothing and equipment, must be of technical intelligence and therefore extraterrestrial, arguing that this logic is flawed. They challenge the idea that wearing a suit and carrying a "pique" proves an extraterrestrial origin, comparing it to a dog in a coat not being from Mars. ADRUP suggests that Monsieur Fouéré might have been influenced by Dr. Jean-Michel Dutuit, a paleontologist who described the figure as a miniaturized human of robust white race. Dutuit's conclusion, based on "remarkably prepared and pertinent" questions (which ADRUP wishes were published), supported the idea of a reduced-scale human.

Scientific Certainty and Media Influence

Page 9 questions how a scientist can be so affirmative based on a single, unproven testimony. It notes that GEPA is now dissolved, making it impossible to obtain further information or documents. The article then discusses how the press seizes upon such stories, citing "Les Dépêches" article from March 5, 1976, which framed the Renève case as an "adventure" important for scientific progress and understanding extraterrestrial life. ADRUP criticizes this framing, stating that the article directly leads the reader to the ET hypothesis without offering other explanations. The journalist's conclusion, suggesting that military radars have detected unidentified craft, is also seen as implying an extraterrestrial connection. ADRUP condemns such articles as tendentious.

Counter-Investigation and Final Thoughts

Page 10 details ADRUP's counter-investigation. They mention previous investigations into other unusual cases in France. The Renève case is described as unique and took nearly two years to study, involving many twists and disappointments. A letter arrives, signaling the end of the provisional investigation. ADRUP then recounts a meeting with "Abbé X" in Pagny on October 13, 1983. The interview was brief due to an impending mass. Initially, the priest was reluctant to speak, referring them to Monsieur Fouéré's book. However, he later stated, "No! You only need to see Monsieur Fouéré's book, it is very good..." He also added, "It is not an ET, one must not see a little green man in it..." This indicates a shift in his perspective or a desire to distance himself from the extraterrestrial interpretation.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue of "Les Dépêches" heavily features the Renève case, presenting the witness testimony, the GEPA's investigation, and a critical analysis by ADRUP. The recurring theme is the interpretation of an unusual encounter, specifically a small humanoid figure. The editorial stance, particularly from ADRUP, is one of skepticism towards hasty conclusions and sensationalism in reporting such phenomena. They advocate for rigorous scientific investigation and caution against jumping to extraterrestrial explanations without sufficient evidence. The article highlights the challenges of investigating anomalous phenomena and the role of media in shaping public perception.

This issue of "L'ÉCHO DE L'AU-DELÀ" (Issue 13) focuses on a detailed investigation into a reported sighting of a small, human-like creature in Renève, France, in 1945. The main cover headline highlights this intriguing case: "Un petit homme singe" (A small monkey man).

The Renève Sighting

The article begins by recounting the testimony of an abbe who described seeing a small being, approximately 15 to 17 cm tall, with an elderly appearance and a childlike face. The abbe's own injured hand prevented him from attempting to capture the creature, which he felt was a human being and should not be displayed publicly.

The Investigation's Path

Investigators, initially stumped, developed a hypothesis that the creature might be a monkey, possibly from a circus or a zoo. This led them to split their investigation: one branch focused on tracing the presence of a circus in the region around 1945, while the other aimed to study the observation site itself.

Searching for a Circus

Initial archival research in Dijon in early November 1984 yielded no information about a circus in the Renève area in 1945. A letter to "30 Millions d'Amis" in January 1984 also went unanswered. The investigators then contacted Jean Richard, a respected figure in the circus world, who provided information on various monkey species and contacts for circus historians, including Monsieur ADRIAN and the Bouglione family. Richard suggested that the "Saimiri," a monkey about 25 cm tall, was the closest match in size to the creature described. Further research identified other similar-sized species: the Marmoset (pygmy marmoset) and the common marmoset.

Monsieur Adrian confirmed that, to his knowledge, no circus had visited Dijon in 1945. With the circus lead proving fruitless, the investigation shifted focus.

The Military Connection

Simultaneously, the investigation explored a new avenue. A visit to the site of the encounter revealed that the field had been left fallow because the owner, M. Grey, was a prisoner of war during that period. Further inquiries in the village led to Monsieur Paul Huot, a butcher, who recalled the presence of French African soldiers in 1945, stationed at the Moulin de la Roye and "Petit Renève." This information, confirmed by M. Grey, shifted the hypothesis towards a military regiment from Africa and its potential exotic animals, specifically monkeys.

Tracing the Regiment

The objective became identifying this African regiment. Regional newspapers from early 1945 provided no clues. The historical service of the army in Vincennes also had no information, redirecting the investigators to the central bureau of military archives in Pau. However, their negative response indicated that any units present in Renève had been dissolved, and the bureau was not authorized to release military names.

Official Military Records

Further correspondence with the military archives in Pau and Vincennes provided some details. In response to a letter dated May 30, 1984, the Historical Service of the Army of Land in Vincennes identified "Combat command nº 2," part of the 1st armored division, as having been stationed in the Renève region from September 10-12, 1944. Its composition included various African units like the 5th Regiment of African Hunters and the 1st Battalion of Zouaves.

However, the provided information was insufficient to pinpoint the specific African regiment sought. The Central Bureau of Military Administrative Archives in Pau, in response to a letter from September 13, 1984, stated that the units mentioned had all been dissolved and that regulations prohibited the communication of individual military information to third parties. They suggested consulting the Historical Service for unit histories.

In a later letter dated February 14, 1985, the Bureau of Military Administrative Archives confirmed they held no archives for the 154th Transport Company and again directed the request to the Historical Service of the Army of Land in Vincennes.

The Breakthrough

An important breakthrough occurred on October 29, 1984, when an investigator received a call informing them that a young local woman had married a soldier from the regiment around 1945. This marriage reportedly took place in Essertène-Cecey, Haute Saône. After confirming this information with the mayor of Essertène-Cecey, the investigators learned that the couple, Monsieur Z and Mademoiselle Y, now lived near Salernes in the Var.

Contacting Monsieur Z, the investigators approached the subject cautiously, posing as researchers interested in the regiment's history, itinerary, military life, and mascots, without directly mentioning the Renève incident. On January 16, 1985, a letter from Monsieur Z provided the solution.

The "Phantom Regiment" and its Mascot

Monsieur Z confirmed that he was a former soldier of the air force regiment CTA 154, which was stationed in Renève, at the Moulin de la Roye, from late 1944 to early 1945. Crucially, he confirmed that the CTA 154 did indeed have a mascot. It was initially a German Shepherd dog that was stolen, and subsequently, a small monkey, described as being of the "ouistiti" (marmoset) type, was brought by a soldier from the AEF (African Expeditionary Force).

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue demonstrates a commitment to rigorous, albeit challenging, investigative journalism. The publication follows leads systematically, consults experts, and navigates bureaucratic hurdles to uncover the truth behind unusual phenomena. The editorial stance appears to be one of open-minded inquiry, exploring possibilities from the mundane (circus animals) to the extraordinary (unidentified creatures) while grounding the investigation in factual research and witness testimony. The narrative highlights the persistence required in such investigations and the satisfaction of finally reaching a plausible explanation, even if it involves a less sensational, yet still intriguing, reality like a military regiment's exotic mascot.

This issue of VIMANA, dated 1985, focuses on a perplexing case from Renève, France, in 1945, under the headline "UNE CERTAINE RESSEMBLANCE TROUBLANTE" (A Certain Troubling Resemblance). The central theme is the comparison of a reported sighting of a small entity with that of a marmoset, exploring the possibility that the observed phenomenon might be an animal rather than an extraterrestrial or unknown being.

The Renève Case: A Marmoset Hypothesis

The article begins by detailing the initial observation made by a priest in Renève. The entity was described as approximately 17 cm tall, with a frightened and fearful demeanor, piercing eyes, plump cheeks, and a 'cream-colored, needle-like' appendage, longer than a knitting needle. The researchers from GEPA (Groupe d'Études des Phénomènes Aériens) propose that these characteristics could align with those of a marmoset. They analyze specific descriptions: the 'ape-like, fearful' nature, the 'globular eyes' and expressive face, the 'plump cheeks with sparse grey hair and a thin beard,' and the 'cream-colored, needle-like' appendage, which they suggest could be a shaved tail of a marmoset, approximately twenty centimeters long, fitting the description.

The 'combination' mentioned in the description is explained as a possible uniform that soldiers, whose regiment was stationed in the village, might have dressed their mascot in, a practice confirmed by a Monsieur Z. The observation of 'breathlessness despite a closed mouth' is interpreted as natural panting of an animal, and its silent disappearance into impenetrable undergrowth is attributed to animal agility and suppleness, citing researchers Robert and Maurice Burton on the quick movements of marmosets.

The article highlights the coincidence of a regiment with a marmoset mascot being present in the village at the time of the sighting in April 1945 in Renève.

The Witness's Rebuttal

However, the witness, identified as Abbé X, strongly refutes this marmoset hypothesis. In a letter dated July 8, 1985, he expresses his amusement and disbelief at the theory, stating, "Your theory is ridiculous and pure imagination." He recounts his observation, which lasted about twenty seconds, and insists that the being was a small humanoid, not an animal. He emphasizes that he would not have contacted GEPA if he were not sure of his observation and regrets being in complete disagreement with their theory, which he believes is flawed.

Correspondence and Research Process

The magazine includes correspondence detailing the research process. A letter dated May 12, 1985, from GEVREY CHAMBERTIN to Monsieur l'Abbé, indicates that after a year of research, they had found a 'rational explanation' and 'almost certain proof' for his testimony, which they wished to submit for his review. They aimed to present their findings in their revue, VIMANA.

A subsequent letter dated June 29, 1985, from GEVREY CHAMBERTIN to Monsieur l'Abbé, expresses concern over the lack of response to their previous letter, noting that the publication of their study in VIMANA was being delayed. They hoped his silence might imply approval of their theory about a small monkey present in Renève in 1945.

In a letter dated July 17, 1985, the researchers acknowledge the Abbé's reaction, stating they understand his response concerning the 'little monkey hypothesis.' They reiterate that their hypothesis is not arbitrary but supported by a serious and objective investigation. They express conviction in his honesty but suggest that his vision might have been subject to 'misinterpretation,' a common occurrence in testimonies. They enclose a copy of their investigation for his judgment, assuring him that his feedback, whether positive or negative, will be considered for their study.

Folklore and Small Humanoids

The article "QUAND LE SINGE PENETRE LE FOLKLORE" (When the Monkey Enters Folklore) explores the broader cultural context of small beings. It references Alika Lindbergh's book "Quand les singes hurleurs se tairont" (When the Howler Monkeys Fall Silent), which describes Lindbergh's experiences raising monkeys and an episode where a farmer reported seeing a 'reddish, thin, and bearded animal' crossing a field. The author notes that the 'little people' in folklore, such as fairies, elves, and lutins, are often associated with nature and forests, similar to how one might think of monkeys in their natural habitat.

Bernard Heuvelmans' work, "Les bêtes humaines d'Afrique" (The Human Beasts of Africa), is cited for its mention of strange beings observed by early explorers, including 'white negroes,' 'cannibals with tails,' and 'monkey-men,' suggesting a long-standing human fascination with ape-like figures.

Appendix of Analogous Cases

The issue concludes with an "APPENDICE DES CAS ANALOGUES" (Appendix of Analogous Cases), presenting several other sightings of small beings or unusual craft from different parts of the world:

• Long Prairie, Minnesota, USA (October 23, 1965): A witness reported a vertical, rocket-shaped object with a circle of light, from which emerged three figures about 12 cm tall, resembling cylindrical boxes on tripod legs with matchbox-shaped arms, and no visible faces or eyes.
• Buck Mertajam, Malaysia (August 19, 1970): Six students saw a small saucer land, and five small figures, about 7.5 cm tall, emerged. The leader wore a yellow outfit with two horns, and the others were in blue with very oblique eyes.
• Bonstruck, Sweden (October 11, 1972): An engineer and his wife observed 'lilliputian delta aircraft' with a wingspan of about 30 cm.
• Ibagué, Colombia (September 10, 1973): Four students and a police officer encountered four small beings, about twenty centimeters tall and human-like, who disappeared upon approach, leaving behind photographed footprints.
• Mendoza, Argentina (October 1979): A doctor photographed a small orange man, about 15 cm tall, described as an elemental being similar to gnomes.

Conclusion

The "CONCLUSION" section poses the question: "PETIT SINGE OU EXTRA-TERRESTRE?" (Little Monkey or Extra-Terrestrial?). It mentions that GEPA, ten years prior, concluded an investigation with an extraterrestrial hypothesis based solely on the fact that the small man was wearing clothes and equipment, which they deemed beyond animal intelligence. However, the issue prompts readers to consider if such intelligence could be human.

The "LA PREUVE" (The Proof) section acknowledges the lack of definitive proof, mentioning a lost old photograph that Monsieur Z possessed. Despite the missing evidence, the magazine expresses hope that the case can be further developed and completed.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the interpretation of anomalous sightings, the comparison of unknown entities with known animals (specifically marmosets), the role of folklore in shaping perceptions of unexplained phenomena, and the presentation of witness testimony alongside investigative research. The editorial stance appears to be one of open inquiry, willing to explore unconventional hypotheses (like extraterrestrial origins) but also grounded in seeking rational explanations and objective evidence, as demonstrated by their detailed analysis and their respectful yet firm engagement with the witness's dissenting opinion. The magazine emphasizes that no dossier remains closed and can be updated at any time, reflecting a commitment to ongoing investigation.

This document is a single page from a magazine, identified by the page number '21'. The primary content is a bibliography titled 'BIBLIOGRAPHIE'. The page appears to be from a publication issued around March 1976, based on one of the entries.

Bibliography Entries

The bibliography lists several entries, covering a range of topics including animals, space phenomena, and extraterrestrial subjects:

• Articles de journaux, LES DEPECHES Mars 1976: This indicates newspaper articles from 'LES DEPECHES' published in March 1976.
• Encyclopédie Universelle des Animaux: Authored by Maurice Burton and Robert, this entry refers to Volume 17, pages 3369 to 3373.
• Le Monde Animal en XII volumes: This multi-volume work is cited as Tome XI, 'Mammifères II', published in 1969, with authors Grzimack and Fontaine.
• Cas d'Ibagué: This entry appears in 'LDLN n) 187', dated August 1979, on page 12. The 'Cas d'Ibagué' likely refers to a specific event or case study.
• Les Bêtes humaines d'Afrique: Authored by Bernard Heu Velmans, this publication is dated 1980.
• Quand les singes hurleurs se tairont: Authored by Alikal Lindbergth, this entry specifies pages 19 and 137.
• Histoire de la Vingeanne pas à pas: Authored by Robinet, this publication is dated 1968.
• Phénomènes spaciaux, N° 45: This entry is from the 3rd quarter of 1975.
• Les Extra-Terrestres: This is a special issue from GEPA, dated 1970, with a reference to page 17, authored by Jader U Pereira.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The bibliography suggests that the magazine or publication from which this page is taken covers topics related to zoology (animals, mammals, monkeys), anthropology or ethnology ('human animals in Africa'), and ufology or paranormal phenomena ('space phenomena', 'extraterrestrials', and the 'Cas d'Ibagué'). The presence of 'GEPA' (likely a group interested in these subjects) and the specific mention of 'LES DEPECHES' indicate a potential interest in reporting on current events or research in these fields. The date range of the entries (1968-1980) points to a focus on contemporary or recent developments during the late 1970s and early 1980s.