Vimana 21 - No 18 - special Chroniques anciennes - 1er trim 1985

Magazine Overview

Vimana 21 is a quarterly magazine published by the Association Dijonnaise de Recherches Ufologiques et Parapsychologiques (A.D.R.U.P.), a non-profit organization operating under the French law of July 1, 1901, and a member of the Fédération Française d'Ufologie (F.F.U.). The magazine costs 10 French Francs and is edited by the association's members, with contributions from researchers and readers being highly valued. The reproduction of articles is permitted with clear source indication.

Editorial and Association Information

The editorial section introduces the magazine as a bulletin of A.D.R.U.P. It lists the responsible individuals: Martine Geoffroy (President), Jean-Claude Calmettes (Vice-President), Patrice Vachon (Treasurer and Enquête), Jocelyne Vachon (Secretary), and Patrick Geoffroy (Para/contactés). Subscription and membership fees are detailed: 130 F for active members, 130 F or more for supporting members, and 60 F for subscriptions. Correspondence should be addressed to the secretariat at A.D.R.U.P., 6, rue des Gémeaux, 21220 GEVREY CHAMBERTIN, with a contact telephone number provided. The editorial also reminds readers that article reproductions require authorization from the journal's bureau and that the documents inserted are under the responsibility of their authors, not necessarily endorsed by A.D.R.U.P.

Table of Contents

• The table of contents outlines the issue's structure, including:
• Introduction
• Superstitions et Coutumes
• Les Pluies Insolites
• Les Météores
• Des Ballons Mystérieux
• Les Orages et la Foudre
• Halo et Parhélies
• Aurore Boréale
• Bibliographie

Introduction

The introduction sets a tone of historical fascination with the sky, noting that from ancient Gaulish times to the present, the sky has evoked passion, intrigue, and fear. It highlights how humans have viewed the sky as a representation of deities, developed astronomy to study it, and eventually sought to conquer space, as evidenced by the 1969 moon landing. The text suggests that even in modern, 'advanced' times, many celestial phenomena remain poorly understood, and despite an overload of information, humanity has lost its symbiotic relationship with nature.

Superstitions et Coutumes

This section explores how celestial events were interpreted by ancestors as dire omens. It recounts the appearance of a comet in 1454 in Burgundy, which caused widespread terror and was linked to the successes of the Turks and the threat of famine. Pope Calixtus even ordered a special 'Angélus' prayer. The text also discusses the fear of 'fire from the sky' (lightning) and the various pagan and religious practices employed to ward it off, such as invoking saints like Sainte Barbe and using blessed objects. It mentions the belief in 'pierres de foudre' (polished prehistoric axes) found in house foundations. The section concludes by correcting a common historical misconception, attributing the invention of the functioning lightning rod not to Benjamin Franklin in 1752, but to the "famous Burgundian Buffon" who built the first ones in Montbard in May 1752.

Les Pluies Insolites (Unusual Rains)

This section details historical accounts of unusual precipitation:

• September 11, 1447: A rain of pyrites (sulfur of iron or copper) fell from the sky after a violent storm in the chatellenie of ROVRES, with some stones weighing three pounds.
• November 24, 1480: Following the death of Charles the Bold and Louis XI's takeover of Burgundy, a 'rain of blood' fell on Dijon on February 15, 1481. A sample of the red liquid was sent to Louis XI. The poet Jean Molinet described it as a 'great sign' and a 'pity'. This event, along with other calamities and famine, plagued Burgundy for two years. The passage of a comet in 1476 had already been seen as a bad omen for the Burgundians.
• 1617: A 'rain of blood' also fell on Sens (Yonne). The surgeon Thomas Montsainet reported that the population believed it to be a sign of great calamity. He analyzed the substance, noting its resemblance to blood but also its characteristics when dry, distinguishing it from vermillion or lake pigments.

Additionally, the section references an account from ancient Rome during the reign of Romulus, where drops of blood fell from the sky, followed by plague and crop failure, interpreted as divine punishment for violating the rights of ambassadors.

Other Sections (Briefly Mentioned)

While the full content of sections like 'Les Météores', 'Des Ballons Mystérieux', 'Les Orages et la Foudre', 'Halo et Parhélies', and 'Aurore Boréale' is not detailed in the provided scans, their inclusion in the table of contents suggests a broader exploration of atmospheric and celestial phenomena.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine's recurring themes revolve around historical anomalies, unusual celestial events, and the human interpretation of these phenomena through folklore, superstition, and early scientific inquiry. There's a clear interest in documenting and analyzing events that deviate from the norm, particularly those observed in the sky and in the Côte d'Or region. The editorial stance appears to be one of historical curiosity and a desire to present documented accounts, while also subtly critiquing modern society's detachment from nature and its potential to overlook or dismiss unexplained phenomena. The emphasis on historical accuracy, as seen in the correction regarding Benjamin Franklin and the lightning rod, suggests a commitment to factual reporting within the context of ufology and parapsychology.

This document, titled "DISCOURS DES VISIONS ET SIGNES PRODIGIEUX" (Discourse on Prodigious Visions and Signs), published in 1582 by AR BENOIST RIGAVD, is a compilation of historical accounts of unusual atmospheric and celestial phenomena, primarily from France, spanning from the 16th to the 20th century. It functions as a collection of case studies, referencing various dates and locations.

Historical Incidents and Observations

The document begins with a series of dated incidents:

• 1867: A severe thunderstorm in Louesme during a communion service caused the church spire to be struck, resulting in 13 deaths and 20 injuries. This event is referenced with a footnote (réf.1).
• 1880: Near Buffon, lightning struck a meadow where a woman was tending cows. Two animals were killed, and remarkably, the woman's gold earring melted, a phenomenon attributed to the high melting point of gold (around 1000°C). Other anecdotes mention watches melting in pockets and objects being broken or magnetized by lightning (réf.11).
• Anecdote: A legend from Vic de Chassenay claims that lightning, following a violent storm, lifted the ground and caused the "Sauve" fountain to erupt (réf.13).
• 1901-06-30: A violent storm hit Dijon, causing significant damage. While the public and local press attributed it to a cyclone, experts concluded it was an electrical waterspout. The administration of the Bourgogne docks sought compensation from insurers, who attributed the damage to wind, thus voiding the insurance. The civil court of Dijon ultimately ruled the damage imputable partly to lightning and partly to the wind's violence (réf.18).
• December 1923: A regional newspaper reported a curious phenomenon, categorized as lightning, a meteor, or something else entirely, prompting correspondence with an astronomy commission.

Corcelles-les-Monts Observation

• Date: Not explicitly stated, but implied to be recent relative to the publication date of the section.
• Location: Corcelles-les-Monts, France.
• Description: The sieur Buisson-Naudin reported seeing a powerful light while returning from Dijon at night. Approximately 300 meters from the village, he and his daughter were surrounded by a brilliant light. They observed a luminous sphere, about 0.50 m high and 0.80 m long, hovering about 8 meters above the ground. The sphere gradually diminished in size and light, shedding three fragments that moved horizontally. The main sphere then stopped, remained immobile, and carbonized over 30-40 seconds. The witness questioned how an object weighing 40 kg could descend so slowly and stop so abruptly.
• Response from Monsieur Gasser: The secretary of the Commission d'Astronomie et de Météorologie acknowledged the interesting observation but noted the missing date. He suggested possible explanations including electrical phenomena (like St. Elmo's fire), a will-o'-the-wisp (feu follet), or more likely, a meteor or bolide. He explained that a bolide passing at the zenith could create such a bright flash, and its apparent disappearance could be due to the Earth's curvature or its impact on the ground. The darkness of the night and the meteor's brightness would have made precise distance estimation difficult.

1967 Incident

• Location: Near Marliens, France.
• Description: A mysterious trace was found, shaped like a starfish with furrows containing a strange mauve powder. Interpretations ranged from a UFO landing to a giant cosmic insect, or simply a prank by "Madame la Foudre" (Madam Lightning) (réf.19).

Historical Celestial Phenomena

• 1582: The document includes a reproduction of a 1582 publication by Benoist Rigavd titled "DISCOURS DES VISIONS ET SIGNES PRODIGIEUX". This section details observations made in Burgundy, Lorraine, and surrounding regions between April 1st and 3rd, 1582.
• April 1st, 1582: Benoit Rigavd observed a bright light resembling daylight, with red, white, and black figures, described as pipe-like and flute-like, mixed with plants and lances. This spectacle lasted for two hours. Later, a bright star was seen fleeing the sun.
• April 2nd, 1582: The following night, a marvelous meteor appeared, containing two armies preparing for battle, one from the east and one from the west. This vision lasted about an hour and a half.
• April 3rd, 1582: Rigavd and his neighbors witnessed a prodigious phenomenon: a circle and roundel of celestial rainbow colors in the sky, with the sun appearing pale. Above this arc, a second sun was visible behind the west, and a third, similar in form and clarity, behind the north. All three suns moved together for about an hour. Rigavd noted that such visions caused wonder, fear, and astonishment, especially to those unfamiliar with ancient histories or natural phenomena.
• Rigavd concludes his account by urging obedience to God and ends with a prayer, signing off from St. Amour on April 4th, 1582.
• October 26th, 1582: Rigavd reported another observation from St. Amour. The sun was surrounded by two large circles, one yellow and whitish, the other leaden and livid. He also saw a descending star-like object, shaped like an acute arrow, then a dart, and finally a large horse hoof, which disappeared into the night.
• 1951-09-27: In Lyon, witnesses saw the sun appear "blue" due to a sudden atmospheric rarefaction of water vapor at high altitude (réf.28).

Halos and Parhelia

• 1894-03-31: A halo and parhelion phenomenon was observed in Dijon at 8 AM, with the witness seeing three suns positioned on the same horizontal circle.
• 1779-05-30: An identical phenomenon was seen near Auxonne, with three suns appearing in a vertical line.
• Interpretation: These visions are explained as the reflection of sun rays in ice crystals within clouds, causing irregular refraction, especially near the horizon. The witness in the 1779 case, a peasant, interpreted the three suns appearing on Trinity Sunday as a divine sign and erected a stone marker commemorating the event.
• Vosges Observation (undated): A report from the Vosges describes seeing two suns, one the true sun and the other a distinct, brilliant reflection, visible through diaphanous cirrus clouds. This phenomenon, occurring on May 23rd (Trinity Sunday), is considered rare and is sought out by some in the mountains.
• 1582 Observation (from a booklet): Benoit Rigaud's account is referenced again, describing a phenomenon in 1582 where a large, clear light resembling daylight appeared, with various colored figures. This was followed by a shooting star and a vision of two armies. Another observation from April 3rd, 1582, described three suns.
• Nature's Mysteries: The document reflects on the recurring nature of such phenomena across different times, days, and locations, suggesting a connection to ancient solar worship (heliolatry).

Aurora Borealis

• 1938-01-25: An aurora borealis, described as a rare phenomenon in the region, was observed in Switzerland near Berne.
• 1938-01-26: The same phenomenon was seen in Dijon at 1 AM, with the sky described as red and very dark (réf.14). The text notes that some might have seen this as a presage of the impending war.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The document consistently explores unusual natural phenomena, often with a historical perspective. It presents eyewitness accounts of lightning, meteors, halos, parhelia, and auroras, sometimes with a sense of mystery and wonder. The editorial stance appears to be one of documenting these events, acknowledging their historical significance, and contrasting older, often superstitious interpretations with more modern, scientific explanations (like electrical phenomena, meteors, or atmospheric optics). There's an underlying theme of respecting the past and learning from historical accounts, even as humanity progresses into the space age. The publication encourages tolerance and curiosity towards the mysteries of the sky, which continue to fascinate.

The document concludes by emphasizing that many natural phenomena remain poorly understood and can be subject to erroneous interpretations. It advocates for a tolerant approach to historical beliefs and encourages a deeper understanding of the sky, which holds enduring mysteries that captivate us.

This issue of VIMANA, dated June 27, 1869 (though the main article concerns events in 1983), focuses on the "Affaire Patouche," a complex investigation into a case of alleged enchantment and paranormal phenomena. The magazine also references historical documents concerning prodigies and portents.

Historical References

The issue begins by listing several historical documents and references:

• La Gazette Vosgienne, June 27, 1869, No. 17: A general reference.
• Reference 28: "Discours des visions et signes prodigieux apparus et vus dans les pays de Bourgogne, Lorraine et autres lieux circonvoisins, 1582," by Benoit Rigaud, held at the Bibliothèque de Grenoble. A related text, "Discours des signes prodigieux apparus en Duché et Comté de Bourgogne, le 26è jour d'octobre 1582," by Benoit Rigaud, is also mentioned.
• Reference 29: "Actes du Congrès de Montbard (Association Bourguignonne des sociétés savantes) 1980 - 51ème congrès, page 61 à 63."

Illustrations in the magazine are stated to be derived from ancient engravings from reference 28, and a collection of 23 brochures in German concerning comets and their portents, as well as meteorological forecasts and prodigies from 1639-1689, housed at the Bibliothèque de Dijon.

The magazine expresses gratitude to the conservator of the Bibliothèque de Grenoble, Monsieur P. Hamon, and the assistant conservator of the Bibliothèque de Dijon, Madame Marie-Françoise Damongeot, for granting permission to photograph and publish parts of these books. It also reminds readers that documents included in VIMANA cannot be photocopied without the authors' permission.

The "Patouche" Affair: An Investigation

The main feature of this issue is the "Affaire Patouche," presented as a "Special Investigation into a Very Special Case of Enchantment." The cover art depicts a pointing hand above a glowing, cloaked figure, suggesting an encounter or accusation.

Avertissement (Warning)

The editorial preface emphasizes the need for an objective attitude, prudence, and skepticism when approaching this complex investigation. The "Patouche" affair, given this code name, is described as a "special enchantment or haunting" and is presented as one facet of a larger study. The principal figure involved is identified as the instigator of numerous events across several departments. The focus of this issue is the "Patouche" affair, which took place in 1983.

To understand the context of the interviews, an autobiography of the central figure, referred to as the "hero," is included. To protect identities, pseudonyms borrowed from the Brothers Grimm fairy tales (like "Blanche-Neige") are used for the individuals involved.

Introduction: Blanche-Neige by Himself

The central figure, "Blanche-Neige," provides his autobiography. He was born in Brazey en plaine in September 1948 and completed his national service in the 4th Hussards in Besançon. In 1969, he began reading works on parapsychology and esotericism after being disturbed by an hypnotist's experiences during his military service. He sought to understand these phenomena.

About a year later, near Marnay, he attempted a ritual with a girl who was supposedly subject to an extraterrestrial manipulation affecting her family for generations. Following the ritual, three craft flew overhead. In 1974, at age 26, he stopped reading about the paranormal and worked to support himself, utilizing his "gifts."

He claims to have made telepathic contact with mental waves and "beings from space." In July of that year, he experienced extraterrestrial manipulation at Villars le Bois. This was followed by numerous other incidents.

He recounts being located by the gendarmerie, and his associates "Grincheux" and "Dormeur," whom he met in July 1980, traveled with him to Lyon and then to Charente Maritime. For 15 months, they attempted UFO landings with members of the Institut Mondial des Sciences Avancées (IMSA). Subsequently, they were in Deux-Sèvres.

His path led him to the Cercle d'Etudes et de Recherches sur les Phénomènes Inexpliqués (CERPI), but this association quickly became problematic, leading to significant conflicts.

Map and Timeline

A map of France is included, marking various locations relevant to "Blanche-Neige's" life and experiences:

1. Birth in 1948 (Brazey)
2. National Service in 4th Hussard (Besançon)
3. Observations and Experiences
4. Observations and Pursuits
5. Charentes Maritimes: discovery of a crypt and consultation room, meeting with CERPI.
6. Experiences in Marnay.
7. Encounter with L'ADRUP in January 1983.
8. Encounter with L'ABEPS in 1980.
9. Verdun sur le Doubs: encounter with beings from space in July 1980.

Further Experiences

"Blanche-Neige" describes his practice of magnetism for healing in the Charente Maritime region, attracting many clients but also facing significant problems. He rented a large farm where he set up a consultation office. Mysterious disappearances and suicides occurred on the farm, leading to gendarmerie investigations.

He attracted a following of young people. He sought assistance from IMSA regarding phenomena on the farm, but their director, Jimmy Guieu, refused to provide a laser device unless he could study the case himself, leading "Blanche-Neige" to abandon the request. He discovered the farm was built on an ancient abbey, leading to excavations that revealed a crypt with 12 chapelles representing the Zodiac signs, forming a pyramid.

He re-established contact with extraterrestrials, who provided data for an attempted landing. He states that extraterrestrials were involved in manipulation within the farm. He faced pressure from the gendarmerie and the Cognac aviation, forcing him to choose between cooperating with the authorities or being interned in a psychiatric hospital. He ultimately abandoned the situation, and the case is now with a lawyer in Beaune. He claims extraterrestrial beings have communicated information to the GEPAN-Toulouse (Groupe d'Etude des Phénomènes Aérospatiaux Non Identifiés), with whom he is in telepathic contact.

He mentions numerous UFO observations and close encounters in Saône et Loire (Mâcon and Verdun sur le Doubs) and Côte d'Or (St Jean de Losne). In 1980, he met the president of the Association Beaunoise d'Etude des Phénomènes Spatiaux (ABEPS), but later had a falling out with that association.

Encounter with L'ADRUP (PROF) on January 21, 1983

The magazine details its first interview with "contactees," specifically "PROF" and three visitors, including "Blanche-Neige," on January 21, 1983. The discussion focused on their adventures and misadventures with unusual events. "Blanche-Neige" explained his experiences with extraterrestrials and encounters with various gendarmes, using a rather vulgar language.

"Grincheux" and "Dormeur," whom he had met three years prior, were also present but spoke little. It was revealed that "Blanche-Neige," a self-proclaimed parapsychologist-medium, was a former member of IMSA, whose paranormal expertise was considered questionable.

Over nearly four hours, "Blanche-Neige" recounted his story, leading them from Charentes Maritimes to Lyon and back to Saône et Loire, where phenomena were recorded. To illustrate his points, he presented a star map with precise markings related to constellations and the Zodiac chapels. A cassette recording of his life, from birth to the present, was also played, though its chronological order was confusing.

The conversation covered six main themes:

1. The life of "Blanche-Neige" as recorded on cassette.
2. The discovery of an abbey with 12 chapels representing Zodiac signs, believed to be a site for contact with "beings from space."
3. Their flight across France, evading gendarmes and aviation.
4. Their contacts with extraterrestrials, including sharing coffee with them.
5. Their encounters with and disappointments from various associations.
6. Their potential for metamorphosis into a scarab.

The Investigator's Approach

The investigators describe their approach to such accounts, initially adopting a passive stance, listening, and then engaging in the "game." They acknowledge that canulars (hoaxes) are common in such investigations. Their strategy involved building trust, encouraging the subject to speak, and carefully analyzing details. They also employed subtle "traps," such as simulating message reception with symbols, which proved effective in making "Blanche-Neige" confide in them.

The investigators note that "Blanche-Neige's" chronological account was confused, prompting them to ask specific questions to clarify points and potentially expose inconsistencies.

Interview Questions and Answers

Key questions posed to "Blanche-Neige" by "PROF" included:

• On the nature of the beings: "Blanche-Neige" stated they come from Orion, mentioning "blue beings" and "Eagle beings" who are difficult. He believes these "Eagle beings" are humans who propelled themselves into pyramids, are 20,000 years ahead of humanity, and are connected to the Eagle constellation. He also suggested that all life on Earth represents a spectrum of beings existing on different states and planets, potentially parallel to us in a different time.
• On God: He described God as having 7 aspects, 7 forces, and a power that is an "intelligent electrical force."
• On other contactees: He felt their messages were simplistic, based on their individual interpretations and vibrations, which require translation, often through hypnosis.
• On the initial trigger: He recalled being in the 4th Hussards in Besançon and befriending a former priest. This priest, who practiced hypnosis, deeply affected him. After leaving the army, he felt there was something more to the priest's abilities and began learning from books by J.C. Victor, noting that many of these books were censored.
• On learning telepathy: He started learning telepathy with Zenner cards, receiving mental waves from his environment, initially unaware of their source. These voices provided glimpses of his future, which he initially interpreted as intuition.

Conclusion of the Interview

After extensive questioning, the interview concluded late at night. "Blanche-Neige" proposed another meeting, which the investigators accepted, continuing to play along with his narrative.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue of VIMANA appears to adopt a stance of cautious investigation into paranormal claims, particularly those involving alleged extraterrestrial contact and supernatural phenomena. While presenting detailed accounts from a contactee, the magazine also employs critical analysis and psychological techniques to assess the veracity of the claims. The inclusion of historical references suggests an interest in tracing patterns of unexplained phenomena across time. The editorial approach seems to be one of open-mindedness tempered with a healthy dose of skepticism, aiming to document and explore these complex subjects without outright dismissal or uncritical acceptance.

This issue of LE BIEN PUBLIC, dated March 30 and April 2, 3, 4, 1983, features a prominent article about the return of a figure known as Blanche-Neige, described as a magnetizer, radiesthesist, and parapsychologist. The cover headline announces his "professional" return, signaling a new phase after a period of absence and training. The issue delves into a complex case of alleged collective bewitchment in Dijon, France.

Blanche-Neige's Return and Initial Claims

The magazine reports that Blanche-Neige, after a period of silence, resurfaced with advertisements indicating his return to the Burgundy region. These ads mentioned his consultation schedule following a stage of practice and experience. He later contacted the publication by phone on May 6, 1983, reporting that his practice had started strongly but that the phenomena were more subtle than those previously encountered in Charentes Maritimes. He claimed to have faced some jealousy from other practitioners but no issues with official services.

The Dijon Case: Collective Bewitchment and Suicide Attempts

Blanche-Neige reported several PSI phenomena in Dijon: a coffin-like sound in a large avenue, a similar sound in an HLM building, and the appearance of a hare's face in an attic. He also stated that sensational phenomena could be expected. A significant claim was that an extraterrestrial landing was anticipated around July. He provided advice on photographing phenomena, suggesting wrapping the camera in lead foil to prevent electrical interference.

Investigation into the HLM Building in Dijon

The article details an investigation into an HLM building in Dijon, which was seemingly targeted by unknown forces, leading to numerous suicide attempts in April 1983. The report suggests that multiple visits to the location would provide further insights.

The "Envoûtement Collectif" Case

On June 1, 1983, Blanche-Neige contacted the publication again, reporting a case of "envoûtement collectif" (collective bewitchment) in Dijon. He described how 7 to 8 families were experiencing suicidal impulses, and one family had sought his help. Blanche-Neige claimed to have intervened and identified the source of the problem as a pyramidal dome causing a magnetic field deviation of 25 degrees. He appeared fatigued by the experience and the malevolent force affecting him.

First Visit and Observations

A verification was conducted by interviewing a resident at the affected building. This resident, while unaware of the specific nature of the phenomena, confirmed the unusual occurrences. The investigation team visited the building on June 2, meeting Blanche-Neige and a resident named Timide. Blanche-Neige expressed surprise at the team's rapid arrival and described the atmosphere as unbearable, noting that Timide's husband, Simplet, had been transferred to the Chartreuse Psychotherapeutic Center in Dijon for detoxification, reportedly at Blanche-Neige's suggestion.

Simplet's Condition and Skepticism

Simplet, who was described as Blanche-Neige's medium, was undergoing detoxification. The article notes that the malevolent force was so overwhelming that people pleaded for help. Blanche-Neige indicated the origin of the negative waves, and photos were taken of a pyramidal structure, identified as the roof of the boiler room.

Second Visit and Conflicting Accounts

During a second visit, the investigation team spoke with Timide, who confirmed the negative presence but expressed confusion about its cause, stating that Blanche-Neige was at his limit. It was revealed that Simplet and Timide had never met Blanche-Neige before and were skeptical about paranormal phenomena, attributing the incidents to mere coincidences. The article implies that Blanche-Neige might have been suggesting ideas rather than objectively assessing the situation.

Third Visit: Confrontation and the "Miracle Virgin"

A third visit occurred after Simplet's return from the psychotherapeutic center. The discussion, partly recorded, involved Simplet, his wife, and Blanche-Neige. A significant part of the conversation revolved around a "miracle Virgin" statue that Simplet had purchased in Lourdes and believed had caused several miracles. Blanche-Neige, however, viewed the statue as a source of "maleficent" form waves, potentially harmful due to its structure and fluorescence.

Simplet expressed his belief in the Virgin's power, recounting a personal experience from his youth involving a fracture and a vision of a white-clad lady. He was hesitant to destroy the statue, suggesting it might be beneficial. Blanche-Neige, conversely, focused on the potential negative influences and the psychological state of Simplet, linking his ambitions and fatigue to his susceptibility to these forces.

Analysis of the "Virgin Miracle"

Simplet recounted an accident in 1972 where he suffered a fracture, while his friend, who was riding with him, was more severely injured. He also described a vision of a lady in white at age 12, which he associated with the Virgin Mary. He found the statue's presentation and form influential. Blanche-Neige, however, suggested that Simplet's weakness lay in his obsessive states and ambitions, which could turn against him. He also mentioned the influence of seasonal changes on Simplet's state.

The discussion touched upon the nature of radiation and its potential effects, with Prof. (presumably the interviewer) suggesting that the Virgin statue might be beneficial or harmful, and that it should be tested. Blanche-Neige suggested that the statue would not be destroyed but offered to someone else. He also stated that Simplet's personal characteristics, including his ambitions and fatigue, made him susceptible to negative influences.

Photographic Evidence and Interpretation

Photos were taken of the "miracle Virgin" statue, with Blanche-Neige identifying it as a source of malefic waves. A discontinuous line on a diagram indicated an intense zone of emission from these waves. The article concludes by noting that Simplet is a strong believer who purchased the statue in Lourdes and has witnessed miracles, while Blanche-Neige perceives it as a source of malefic waves.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The issue heavily features the figure of Blanche-Neige and his claims regarding paranormal phenomena, particularly in the context of collective bewitchment and negative energies. The editorial stance appears to be one of investigation and reporting, presenting Blanche-Neige's claims alongside interviews and observations. There is an underlying theme of skepticism, particularly from the interviewed residents who question Blanche-Neige's interpretations. The article also explores the psychological aspects of belief and susceptibility to paranormal influences, particularly in relation to the "miracle Virgin" statue and the alleged "envoûtement collectif" in Dijon.

This document, comprising pages 35 through 39, appears to be an excerpt from a French magazine, likely focused on parapsychology, UFOs, and unexplained phenomena. The main narrative revolves around an investigation into a case referred to as the "Patouche" affair, which involves alleged enchantment and psychological manipulation.

The Simplet Case: Initial Encounters and Suspicions

The narrative begins with a detailed account of an interview, possibly with Simplet, who recounts a past experience of feeling manipulated and almost trapped. He describes his reactions and how he managed to avoid a perceived "trap" by feigning a desire to go out with his wife. The conversation also touches upon personal anxieties, such as the fear of illness and death, linked to his father's early demise from cancer.

The Rituals of Blanche-Neige

A significant portion of the text focuses on the practices of a figure named Blanche-Neige, described as a "magus" who claims to be contacted by extraterrestrials. A drawing illustrates a ritual involving three red-tinted candles arranged in a triangle, set up in a living room. The text explains that Blanche-Neige uses such séances for automatic writing to receive messages from space entities. He also claims that the white paraffin dripping from the red candles signifies the circulation of negative waves within the room, and he believes the building's structure acts as an accumulator of these waves.

The investigators express skepticism towards these practices, noting that Blanche-Neige's methods appear more folkloric than genuinely magical. They express a quasi-definitive opinion about Blanche-Neige after this "fourth visit."

Intervention and Resolution by Joyeux

The story takes a turn with the introduction of Joyeux, a professional medium and clairvoyant. Timide, Simplet's wife, reports that the case has been resolved, attributing the resolution to Joyeux's intervention. Joyeux recounts how she confronted Blanche-Neige, admonishing him for his manipulative actions and urging him to distance himself from Simplet and his wife. She accuses him of abuse of confidence and of fabricating stories. Joyeux claims to have resolved the situation by reassuring the victims, whom she believed were being exploited by a charlatan seeking money and possibly more.

An intriguing hypothesis is raised that Joyeux's motives might have extended beyond simple help, possibly involving a romantic interest in Simplet's wife.

Investigation Notes and Character Analysis

Further investigation reveals that Blanche-Neige was a job applicant living with Timide while Simplet was hospitalized, adding a layer of complexity to the relationships. The epilogue provides a character summary of the key figures:

• Simplet: Described as naive, highly credulous, ambitious, and eager to fulfill his dreams. He is easily influenced by Blanche-Neige but later opts for a rational explanation, influenced by Joyeux.
• Timide: Simplet's wife, who rarely intervenes but often agrees with Blanche-Neige. The text questions if she is part of a complicity.
• Atchoum: Simplet's mother, who has serious problems but remains skeptical about the affair, tending to believe "Prof" (likely an investigator).
• Joyeux: A professional clairvoyant who appears sincere and opposes exploitative practices. She used psychology to reassure the couple.
• Blanche-Neige: Labeled as a "magus" contacted by space beings, he is described as a magnetizer and radiesthetist with limited knowledge of parapsychology. He is prone to chronic mythomania, unconsciousness, and pathological behavior, bordering on abuse of confidence and dubious commerce. He imposes himself with audacity or unconsciousness on those he seeks to captivate with his fantastical stories.
• Dormeur and Grincheux: Two companions mentioned at the beginning of the affair, but who are not further discussed.

The text also mentions that at the start of the "Patouche" affair, there were 7 or 8 other families involved, but only one seemed genuinely concerned, attributing troubling events to mere coincidences.

Concluding Thoughts: The Lingering Question of Influence

The final section, titled "What Remains of This Affair 'Of Enchantment'", poses a question: "Don't you think that, if not enchantment by the magus on his victims, at least a certain psychological hold has occurred?" The authors acknowledge that this fact could not be fully confirmed due to privacy concerns but state they have encountered similar cases elsewhere in France and abroad. They note that the magus has disappeared, and they are not giving up hope of finding him. The text concludes by emphasizing that the naivete of some people leads them to embrace the marvelous over the material, limiting the authors' role in prevention. They warn that other "false enchanted" individuals will fall prey to unscrupulous magi, and they urge readers to exercise prudence and reflection.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are parapsychology, mediumship, alleged supernatural phenomena, psychological manipulation, and potential fraud within these fields. The editorial stance appears to be one of cautious investigation, skepticism towards sensational claims, and a focus on psychological explanations and the dangers of exploitation. The authors position themselves as investigators seeking to understand and, to some extent, prevent individuals from falling victim to charlatans and their dubious practices, while acknowledging the persistent allure of the unexplained.