Ufology News Special Bulletin - No 01 2012

Magazine Overview

Title: НОВОСТИ УФОЛОГИИ (UFO News)
Issue: Special Bulletin #1, 2012
Publisher: Supported by MNITS EIBC and UNITSA "Zond"
Content Focus: Declassified materials on anomalous phenomena, primarily UFO/UAP sightings and radar observations in Ukraine.

Declassified Materials: Anomalous Impact Sites in Kharkiv Region

The issue begins by presenting declassified materials from the Kharkiv regional section of the "Study of Anomalous Phenomena in the Environment" of the All-Union Scientific and Technical Society of Radio Electronics named after A.S. Popov. These reports detail several anomalous impact sites (MB-1 to MB-5).

MB-1: On January 1, 1983, near Kharkiv, a UFO was observed hovering or landing on a snow-covered field. After takeoff, the site showed melted snow and several greenish traces. Witnesses included schoolchildren and adults. Investigations involved biolocation measurements, which indicated a decline in well-being for some investigators. The UFO was described as a shapeless cloud with blurred contours, featuring red, yellow, and green lights around its perimeter and three prongs below.

MB-2: On June 30, 1986, near St. Kolomak, four figures with green glowing eyes and rectangular UFO outlines were seen by students. The encounter caused fear. Investigations included biolocation measurements and soil sampling. Radiometric measurements revealed gamma radioactivity. Floating radioactivity was detected in the vicinity, varying sinusoidally.

MB-3: On July 29, 1989, near Rubizhne village, a UFO landing was witnessed by an elderly woman and a boy, with a figure seen near the object. Information was received later that people in the area were experiencing unexplained fear, preventing further investigation.

MB-4: On October 7, 1989, near Izyum, two witnesses observed a disc-shaped UFO taking off. The next evening, the same driver saw a red light in the same area. Investigations revealed two landing traces (pits) and a core sample.

MB-5: On November 5, 1989, near Mezhytsia-1 village, a UFO (10m diameter sphere) appeared, descended to the ground three times, and remained for about two hours. The landing site was found to be damp. The investigation was conducted by V.P. Volovikov and an initiative group.

Results of Theodolite Measurements of AO Parameters in Kharkiv (December 2, 1983)

This section details the results of theodolite measurements conducted by the Kharkiv regional section to study an anomalous phenomenon observed on December 2, 1983. This event was one of the most significant mass sightings. The section received 30 reports, and some witnesses agreed to participate in theodolite measurements. The measurements were carried out from August 1 to October 31, 1984, aiming to process measurement methodology and analyze flight trajectories. The study used instruments like theodolites, clinometers, compasses, and chronometers. They also used a large-scale map and employed the "triangle method" to model the object's trajectory. The analysis suggested an average speed of 1200 km/sec (5 km/sec) and a downward trajectory of 1 to 5 degrees. Speeds south of Kharkiv were calculated at 14.42 km/sec, indicating high anomaly. The average length and height of the main group of AOs were 24 km and 16.5 km, respectively, with the main object estimated to be at least 500m in diameter. Some reports suggested the presence of two additional groups of objects. One group was observed moving at a speed of about 1.2 km/sec (4320 km/h) at an altitude not exceeding 12 km. Another observation involved a clearly defined AO at the Eastern settlement of Kharkiv, with similar objects seen nearby. Calculations indicated an object approaching from the northwest at an altitude of about 100m, smoothly changing course and increasing altitude to 500m. At the observers' altitude, the speed was 70-100 m/sec (250-360 km/h), increasing to 420 km/h upon ascent. The study concluded that the phenomenon could not be definitively explained and required further investigation.

Radar Observations of Anomalous Aerial Objects

This section discusses radar observations of unidentified aerial objects (UAPs), referred to as "unidentified objects" or "unidentified targets" by radar operators. These objects are often identified by their anomalous trajectories, unusual speeds, and sudden changes in speed and altitude. The article focuses on observations reported to the Kharkiv regional section.

Over the past year, 12 reports of AO observations by radar operators were received from across the country. Five of these were from previous years, and seven were from the current year (1984).

• Key characteristics of observed AOs:
• Detection: Primarily detected by radar when operating in "Passive" or "SDC" (moving target selection) modes.
• Timing: Observations occurred independently of the season, but more frequently in the latter half of the year, usually during nighttime.
• Conditions: Often observed during clear weather with stable meteorological conditions.
• Movement: Objects moved at speeds ranging from 800 to 3,600 km/h, with one case of 7,000 km/h.
• Altitude: Varied widely, from 250 to 30,000 meters.
• Maneuvers: Objects exhibited various maneuvers, including being stationary, sudden acceleration, sharp turns, and rapid changes in speed and altitude.
• Duration: Observations ranged from tens of seconds to several hours.
• Confirmation: In four cases, radar observations were confirmed by independent visual observations. Visually, the objects appeared as glowing bodies of various geometric shapes.

Comparison with US Observations:

Twenty American radar observations from the 1950s-1960s were examined for comparison. The findings showed good agreement with domestic observations. Both American and Soviet observations peaked in September and October, occurred at night, and involved objects moving at speeds between 800 and 3,000 km/h at altitudes of 60 to 20,000 meters. The objects demonstrated similar maneuvering capabilities.

Explanations and Counterarguments:

Common explanations for radar observations include equipment malfunctions, insect swarms, bird flocks, false radar echoes, and signals from conventional aircraft. However, the authors argue that many such explanations are based on subjective opinions rather than objective analysis. An example is given of a 1964 observation of seven AOs near Bermuda, which was explained as a battleship and its escorts, despite the objects covering 180 km in 10 minutes, indicating a speed of 1080 km/h.

Conclusion on Radar Observations:

The authors conclude that the similarities between domestic and international radar observations suggest they are manifestations of a special class of material objects with unique properties. Further scientific research is needed to understand their nature. The current experience indicates that radar equipment can effectively be used for both accidental detection and systematic scientific observation of AOs. However, systematic scientific radar observations of AOs have not yet been organized in Russia, and information is often received sporadically and by chance.

Recommendations for Improving Radar AO Detection:

1. Develop a specialized methodology for radar AO observations and disseminate it to radar operators.
2. Coordinate observation efforts between air traffic control points and centers of various departments when AOs are detected.
3. Increase the use of photo-registrars for radar screens.
4. Establish prompt notification of relevant scientific research organizations regarding AO radar observations.

Implementing these preliminary measures would not require significant financial investment. However, the authors suggest that specialized scientific stations should be established in the future, integrating radar with other observation and registration tools.

Literature Cited:

The article lists several references, including works on anomalous phenomena, the Condon Report, and Hynek's UFO research.

Radar Observations (HPM) as of December 1981

This section presents specific radar observations:

1. Summer 1980: A target was detected by the PHT Rashevka radar in passive mode. An An-24 crew flying nearby did not visually detect anything. The object moved towards Poltava and then towards the Sea of Azov, performing intense flights at altitudes of 10,200m. No information on the object's detection in Poltava was received. Its speed was estimated at around 800 km/h, and it was observed for about 30 minutes.

2. December 1981: A cross-shaped glowing object accompanied a Tu-154 and two other aircraft for about 15 minutes. The object's speed and altitude changed rapidly, and it moved east of the flight path. It eventually overtook the other aircraft, with its speed estimated at over 2,000 km/h. The object was consistently tracked by the overview radar.

3. August 13, 1983: A visual observation of a reddish UFO near Kharkiv airport at an altitude of about 250m was accompanied by radar tracking. The object was tracked intermittently. Another target, similar to the UFO, was detected flying parallel to the first object. This second object later changed its trajectory northward. The objects were estimated to be moving at speeds of around 600 km/h, with calculations suggesting speeds of 900-1500 km/h for the first object and 1200 km/h for the second. The objects were estimated to be about 5 meters in size.

4. December 3, 1983: An unidentified target was detected by the DRLS-9 radar at a distance of 35 km and an azimuth of about 80°. The object was moving northwest at approximately 18-20 km/min (1080-1200 km/h). It disappeared at an azimuth of 45° and a distance of 18 km. Unusual atmospheric conditions were noted.

Possibilities of Using USSR Civil Aviation Radar for Detecting Unidentified Objects with Anomalous Characteristics

This section discusses the growing need for scientific study of unidentified objects with anomalous characteristics (AOs). While debates continue regarding their nature, research is progressing both internationally and in Russia. The authors emphasize that predicting AO appearances is impossible, making direct study challenging. Historically, research relied on witness reports, which are subject to subjectivity. The current passive study method is deemed insufficient for generating new knowledge.

Therefore, there is a pressing need to intensify domestic research and transition to active, direct study using modern technical means. This requires specialized equipment, significant material investment, and competent specialists. The active study of AOs in Russia began in the late 1970s and early 1980s with research by F.Yu. Siegel. The authors propose accelerating this process by involving existing observation services and utilizing existing radar equipment.

Radar systems worldwide have been detecting AOs for a long time. Operators are increasingly able to distinguish AOs from other objects and interference. The number of AO radar observations is significant, with one researcher estimating around 700 monthly observations by a "Western defense system." Numerous documented radar-visual observations exist, including notable cases in Washington (1952) and near Lakenheath (1956).

Domestic radar observations are also frequent. In 1984 alone, the Kharkiv airport's radar service provided 8 good reports of AO observations. Analysis of these observations revealed specific conditions under which AOs are detected: radar operating in "Passive" or "SDC" modes, observations occurring in the latter half of the year and at night. Similarities were found between domestic and foreign observations, as well as with known patterns from visual AO studies.

Conclusion: Modern radar equipment can detect AOs and record their parameters, making it a valuable tool for scientific study. However, systematic scientific radar observations of AOs are not yet organized in Russia, and information is often received irregularly and by chance. This hinders research and leads to the loss of valuable data.

Recommendations: The authors reiterate the proposal to establish specialized scientific stations integrating radar with other observation and registration tools (laser rangefinders, infrared converters, photo-recorders, etc.) in areas where AOs are frequently observed.

Cooperation with Civil Aviation: The authors highlight the potential for cooperation with the USSR Ministry of Civil Aviation (MGA) due to its extensive radar network. They note that civil aviation workers are interested in collaboration, having encountered AOs in their daily work. The Kharkiv airport section had previously conducted training sessions for flight and dispatch personnel and developed recommendations for reporting AOs. However, this collaboration was interrupted in early 1985 when the MGA stated it had its own commission for AOs and did not require external cooperation. The authors believe this approach has harmed both their research and civil aviation safety. They maintain that collaboration with the MGA could benefit both science and the aviation sector by addressing scientific and practical issues, such as flight safety.

List of Necessary Equipment for Comprehensive Study of AO Impact Sites

This section lists equipment recommended for studying AO impact sites, based on temporary recommendations from the Gorky section:

• Vehicles: Specially equipped van on a high-mobility vehicle chassis with a power generator and batteries.
• Geophysical Equipment: PES-2 (on a GAZ-66 vehicle) with magnetometer, electrometric apparatus, quartz generator, etc.
• Recording Instruments: Self-recording milliammeters (portable), types PPM, ZIP, H320, etc.
• Other: Cassette tape recorder, cameras with accessories, metal detector, quartz generator, frequency counter, voltage converter, batteries, coaxial cables, magnetometers (various types), gravimeters, spectrum analyzer, measuring receivers, measuring antennas, thermal imagers, radiation detectors, luminoscopes, electric accelerators, magnetic susceptibility meters, anode batteries, rock generators.
• Additional Equipment (Kharkiv Section): Superconducting magnetometer, superconducting magnetogradientometer, Fourier spectrometer, radar equipment (airport-based, meteorological, specialized complexes), X-ray spectrometer, combined instruments (metal detector, photo-theodolite, etc.), mass spectrometer, portable radio receiver with magnetic antenna.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the detailed investigation of specific anomalous aerial phenomena (UAPs) through eyewitness accounts and scientific measurements, and the analysis of radar data for detecting and studying these objects. There is a strong emphasis on the need for a more systematic, active, and technologically advanced approach to UAP research, moving beyond passive observation and anecdotal evidence. The editorial stance appears to be one of advocating for rigorous scientific inquiry into UAPs, highlighting the potential of radar technology and the importance of inter-agency cooperation, while also expressing frustration with bureaucratic obstacles and a perceived lack of official support for comprehensive research.

This document appears to be a collection of scientific papers or reports related to the study of anomalous phenomena (AP) and unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP), likely from a Russian publication. The issue date is indicated as 1989, with a cover headline focusing on a group UFO observation on a weather radar in Gorky in August 1979. The content spans various aspects, from specific sighting reports and methodological recommendations to broader theoretical discussions and investigative findings.

Group Observation of UFOs on Weather Radar in Gorky in August 1979

This section details two distinct radar observations of anomalous objects in Gorky. The first, in August 1974, involved a V-shaped formation of 15-20 objects observed at a distance of 200-250 km, with a height of 245 km. These objects were stationary but would spontaneously disappear and reappear. The second observation, also in August 1974, involved a single object moving radially towards the radar at 1 km/sec, which then maneuvered 180 degrees and moved away, disappearing at 150-200 km. This observation was witnessed by 10-15 radar specialists. The report is attributed to Professor Yu.I. Pakhomov and dated December 1981.

Review of Methodological Sessions with Flight Crew of the Kharkiv United Aviation Detachment

This report describes a session held on December 7, 1984, attended by 72 people. Scientific Secretary of the Kharkiv Regional Section for the Study of Anomalous Phenomena, A.S. Popova, Belesky Alexander Vasilievich, and group leader for information gathering, Mantulin Vladimir Semenovich, delivered lectures on the 'Problem of anomalous phenomena and methods of AP determination.' The sessions included slides and were well-received by the audience, with questions answered and discussions held. The reports were deemed informative and met the required level for flight crew training in identifying AP and reporting observations. The report is signed by Deputy Commander of the Flight-Transport Detachment of the Kharkiv OAO, Yu.M. Konotop.

Review of a Lecture for Personnel of Military Unit 21339

This document details a lecture given on December 14, 1984, to 50 people. Scientific Secretary of the Kharkiv Regional Section of NTO RES named after A.S. Popova, Belesky Alexander Vasilievich, delivered a lecture on anomalous phenomena. The lecture was presented at a high scientific level, utilizing photographic materials, slides, and magnetic recordings. The personnel listened with great attention and interest and expressed gratitude to Comrade Belesky A.V. The report is signed by the Commander of Military Unit 21339, V. Abramov.

Recommendations for Creating a Mobile Apparatus Complex for Studying Characteristics of Anomalous Phenomena and the Results of Their Impact on the Environment

This extensive section proposes the creation of a specialized, all-terrain mobile vehicle complex for the comprehensive study of anomalous phenomena (AP) and anomalous objects (AO). The complex would be designed to observe and record characteristics of AP/AO and their residual traces on the environment. The authors suggest that such a complex could be justified by the regular observation of AP/AO in localized regions over significant periods. The proposed equipment includes a wide range of instruments:

• For observing and recording atmospheric AP and AO:
• Compact radar stations (meter, decimeter, centimeter, and millimeter bands).
• Photo and film equipment for recording radar screen images and atmospheric phenomena.
• Optical instruments (binoculars, telescopes) for visual observation during the day and at night.
• Night vision devices (optical and infrared).
• Passive wide-aperture acoustic systems with spectrum analyzers.
• Autonomous magnetometers for recording magnetic field intensity.
• Sensitive gravimetric variometers for measuring gravity variations.
• Thermostatted quartz generators for recording frequency shifts.

• For studying residual traces of AP/AO on the environment:
• Dosimeters for assessing radiation levels.
• Metal detectors.
• Field luminoscopes for detecting luminescent properties.
• Sampling tools and containers.
• Portable tape recorders for recording witness accounts.
• Cameras with filters and film.
• Magnetometers to measure changes in the natural magnetic field.
• Selective receivers for detecting the influence of AP/AO on quartz generator frequencies.
• Night vision devices for assessing the condition of impact sites at night.

The report emphasizes the need for a mobile complex to overcome the limitations of current sporadic and poorly equipped expeditions. It also discusses the potential use of a modified 'Groza' aircraft radar and the importance of a coherent mode for Doppler frequency analysis.

Air Defense Forces Ready to Ensure Non-Use of Their Firepower Against an Alien Ship, Document of 1989

This document, dated April 19, 1989, is a response to an inquiry addressed to the President of the USSR. It states that the Air Defense Forces are prepared to ensure that their firepower is not used against an alien ship, provided they receive timely notification of its approach and flight path. The document is signed by Lieutenant General of Aviation I. Maltsev, Chief of the Main Staff of the Air Defense Forces.

History of the Origin of the Milkhiker Document

This section provides context for the document referenced above, likely related to a proposal or inquiry from Milkhiker.

Review of Methods and Results of Research on AP Traces on the Earth's Surface (Examples from the Moscow Region)

This paper summarizes research on anomalous phenomena (AP) traces on and below the soil surface, conducted by a group of enthusiasts between 1977 and 1984. The research involved eyewitness accounts, site visits, and the application of various investigative methods. The study identified several potential impact sites in the Moscow region, including Podrezkovo, Sharapova Okhota, Levkovo, Novy Ierusalim, Strokin, and Tslaushchevo. The findings indicated common characteristics at these sites, such as proximity to power lines, dried trees, soil anomalies, and biological effects like inhibited plant growth. Cytological anomalies were also detected. The research employed several methods, including biolocation, radiotechnical and chronal measurements, cytological analysis, psychological and physiological assessments, and soil analysis.

Biolocation Methods

This method, pioneered by A.I. Pluzhnikov, uses operators with metallic frames to determine anomaly coordinates.

Radiotechnical and Chronal Methods

Developed by R.G. Varlamov, this method uses various radiotechnical sensors and chronometers to detect residual effects.

Cytological Methods

Proposed by Yu.G. Simakov, this method uses simple organisms (flagellates) to assess the impact of anomalous zones.

Psychological and Physiological Methods

These methods, initiated by Varlamov R.G., Kazansky O.A., Zigel F.Yu., and Leontovich L.S., involve subjective assessments and the use of instruments to check physiological parameters.

Soil Analysis

Traditional geological analysis and specialized apparatus were used for soil anomaly research, notably by N.N. Sochevanov and his group.

Biological Methods

Visual and instrumental analysis, including studies in agrochemical laboratories, were employed to investigate biological anomalies.

Comparison of Results and Hypotheses

The comparison of results from various research methods indicated a high degree of correlation, suggesting the reliability of the techniques. The paper notes that many of these methods were first proposed and implemented by domestic researchers and were not described in foreign UFO literature. Several hypotheses are discussed, including the 'alien spacecraft' hypothesis and the 'Earth's force field' hypothesis, as well as the 'multidimensionality of the original world' hypothesis proposed by R.L. Bartini.

Conclusion

The research suggests that the study of AP traces has progressed through several stages, from initial data collection to detailed investigation of impact sites. The current trend is towards using active and passive radar and other advanced equipment for dynamic observation of anomalous objects. The findings may support a plasma model of AO, potentially providing evidence for their artificial nature.

Photographic экспертиза of a Film

This report details the экспертиза of a film strip taken by Yu. Emelyanov in Severodvinsk in January 1985. The film allegedly captured a luminous object. The экспертиза revealed two frames with different exposures, showing a dark, wavy band and a dark spot. The analysis concluded that the images likely represent a moving object with varying brightness or a stationary object with fluctuating speed, possibly due to camera tremor during a long exposure.

Conclusion of Photographic экспертиза

The images on the negatives are interpreted as light-emitting point objects. Given the long exposure and handheld shooting, the most probable conclusion is that the wavy line on one frame represents a moving object with varying brightness, or a stationary object with fluctuating speed, with the broken trajectory and density fluctuations attributed to hand tremor.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this document revolve around the scientific investigation of anomalous phenomena and unidentified aerial objects. There is a strong emphasis on methodological rigor, the development of specialized equipment (particularly mobile complexes), and the correlation of findings from various scientific disciplines (radar, physics, biology, psychology, geology). The publication appears to advocate for a systematic, evidence-based approach to understanding these phenomena, moving beyond mere anecdotal reports to rigorous data collection and analysis. The editorial stance seems to be one of serious scientific inquiry into unexplained aerial events, exploring both observational data and theoretical models.

This document is a report detailing the activities of the anomalous phenomena (AP) study group at the Kislovodsk branch of the Geographical Society of the USSR Academy of Sciences. The report is dated January 31, 1986, and was compiled by the group's leader, engineer-geologist Georgy Polkovsky.

Group Establishment and Objectives

The Kislovodsk AP group was officially established on January 22, 1982, with Georgy Polkovsky serving as its leader. The group's primary objective is to gather and process firsthand information about anomalous phenomena from eyewitnesses. This involves using a standardized questionnaire, developed based on analyses of similar documents from other groups, to interview witnesses. The collected materials are then checked, clarified, and analyzed. Initially, these materials were sent to the Commission for Anomalous Phenomena at the USSR Geographical Society in Leningrad and later to the Gorky section. However, due to a lack of contact with the Gorky section's leadership, materials were no longer forwarded after 1984. To date, the group has gathered 147 eyewitness testimonies.

Group Composition and Activities

The group currently comprises 9 members of the Geographical Society, though some have become less active. The professional backgrounds of the members include: 2 engineer-geologists, 1 journalist/photographer, 3 pilots and aviation specialists, 1 radio technician, 1 medical professional, and 1 construction technician. In addition to official members, a group of active volunteers assists. The age range of the group members is between 30 and 65 years.

Beyond information gathering, some members, with the help of volunteers, have conducted experiments to photograph anomalous phenomena at night. These phenomena included observed trajectories, visually unobservable energetic discharges, and round objects, particularly in the area of Mount Beshtau near Pyatigorsk. Similar experiments were also conducted in collaboration with the Rostov section of the NTO RES named after A.S. Popova in the spring of 1985, with negatives being transferred to them for their report.

Theoretical Framework and Research Focus

The group posits that the UFO phenomenon is fundamentally psychophysical in nature. Consequently, they place significant emphasis on studying the manifestations of psychophysical phenomena in humans, including experimental verification of the capabilities of individuals with extrasensory abilities. They believe that understanding this area is crucial for solving the mystery of UFO phenomena. The group's approach is based on a materialistic interpretation of anomalous phenomena, as outlined in Polkovsky's 1982 manuscript, "Materialism, 'Materialists,' and the Cognition of the Real World."

The group's operational scheme involves: a) collecting and processing eyewitness accounts; b) identifying and verifying individuals with extrasensory abilities; and c) theoretically developing a materialistic understanding of the mechanisms behind psychophysical phenomena based on factual material. The group does not have specific long-term work plans.

Collaboration and Reporting

The group has submitted a brief report on its activities for the period 1982-1985 and is requesting to be included in the Commission for Anomalous Phenomena under the All-Union Scientific and Technical Society (VSNTO). They mention having previously sent materials to V.B. Vilinbykhov (Leningrad) and E.A. Ermilov (Gorky). The report includes a list of 28 declassified materials related to anomalous phenomena in the USSR and Ukraine, covering topics such as radar observations, anomalous object characteristics, and eyewitness accounts. The group lacks specialized working space and uses Polkovsky's home address for correspondence. The report is signed by Polkovsky and dated June 11, 1985. The Kislovodsk department's address and contact persons (G.N. Tagunov and F.I. Visliev) are also provided.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The report strongly advocates for a materialistic and scientific approach to understanding anomalous phenomena, emphasizing the psychophysical aspects and the need for rigorous investigation. It highlights the group's efforts in data collection, experimental photography, and the study of human psychic abilities as key components of their research. The document also indicates a desire for broader recognition and integration within the official Soviet scientific community dealing with these topics.