AI Magazine Summary

Ufologie Contact - Series Nouvelle - No 06 - janv 1981

Summary & Cover Ufologie Contact

Ever wanted to host your own late-night paranormal radio show?

Across the Airwaves · Narrative Sim · Windows · $2.95

You’re on the air. Callers bring Mothman, Fresno Nightcrawlers, UFO sightings, reptilian autopsies, and whispers about AATIP and Project Blue Book. Every reply shapes how the night goes.

UFO & UAP Cryptids Paranormal Government Secrets Classified Files High Strangeness Strange Creatures
The night is long. The lines are open →

20,263

issue summaries

Free. Always.

Support the Archive

Building and maintaining this collection is something I genuinely enjoy. If you’ve found it useful and want to say thanks, a small contribution keeps me motivated to keep expanding it. Thank you for your kindness 💚

Donate with PayPal

AI-Generated Summary

Overview

Title: UFOLOGIE CONTACT Issue: N°6 Nouvelle Série Date: January 1981 Publisher: SPEPSE Country: France Price: 9,00F

Magazine Overview

Title: UFOLOGIE CONTACT
Issue: N°6 Nouvelle Série
Date: January 1981
Publisher: SPEPSE
Country: France
Price: 9,00F

This issue of UFOLOGIE CONTACT, a French ufology bulletin, delves into the complex logical and methodological frameworks required for serious UFO research. The cover features a striking illustration of a UFO over the Americas, with the title prominently displayed.

Editorial and Subscription Information

The magazine outlines two subscription formulas: UFOLOGIE CONTACT, offering four issues annually for 20.00F, and UFOLOGIE CONTACT SPECIAL, a supplementary bulletin with three issues per year for 25.00F. Both subscriptions commence on January 1st. The editorial team is listed, with R. BONNAVENTURE as the Director of Publication, based in Marly-le-Roi. The publication is printed and edited by SPEPSE.

An editorial note from the "Au lecteur....." section reflects on the challenges of maintaining a cohesive research group, citing reasons for members leaving such as a lack of commitment, burnout, or a perceived climate of suspicion and "intellectual contestation" within the group. The editorial stance is to provide information from diverse sources and allow the reader to judge, acknowledging the potential for the information to be incomplete or subjective due to the nature of UFO phenomena.

Logical Bases of Ufological Investigation

A substantial portion of the issue is dedicated to a theoretical exploration of the logical frameworks applicable to ufological research. The article "BASES LOGIQUES DE L'INVESTIGATION UFOLOGIQUE" argues that while macroscopic, reproducible phenomena can be analyzed using Aristotelian logic, the nature of ufological data—characterized by difficulty of access, non-reproducibility, and elusiveness—necessitates a different approach.

Aristotelian vs. Intuitionistic Logic

The author posits that Aristotelian logic, based on principles like the "law of the excluded middle" (tiers exclu), is insufficient for dealing with the "transient and a-causal" nature of UFO phenomena. Instead, an "intuitionistic logic" is proposed, which does not strictly adhere to the principle of the excluded middle. This logic allows for the consideration of all reported facts, even contradictory ones, and focuses on the plausibility of events rather than their objective certainty.

Principles of Intuitionistic Logic in Ufology

Two key principles are introduced for this intuitionistic approach:

1. PRINCIPE DES FAITS PRESUMES (Principle of Presumed Facts): All reported facts are considered potentially true, regardless of contradictions.
2. PRINCIPE DE RELATIVITE DE L'OCCURENCE (Principle of Relativity of Occurrence): Reasoning must account for the plausibility of facts, not just their objective existence. This involves integrating a limiting factor related to the degree of adequacy of each presumed fact to objective reality.

The article draws an analogy to the shift in physics from classical mechanics to quantum mechanics (Rutherford to Bohr), where concepts like probability zones replaced precise locations and wave functions replaced particles. The author suggests that a non-Aristotelian logic is not strictly necessary if one can relativize the Aristotelian framework.

Modeling and Analysis of Ufological Data

The issue further explores the process of modeling and analyzing UFO data using these logical principles. It discusses the concept of "flou" (fuzziness) in data, where reports may or may not be genuine UFO phenomena. The analysis involves defining subsets of UFO reports (e.g., A and B) within a larger set (C), and considering their potential membership in a set D (true UFOs).

Correlation and Validity

The research methodology involves searching for correlations between different criteria within these fuzzy sets. However, it emphasizes the need to assess the "coefficient of validity" of these correlations, which measures their reliability based on the quality of the underlying data. This validity coefficient is linked to the intrinsic value (Vi) of each report, representing a rough estimate of its probability of belonging to the set of true UFOs.

The Path to Modeling

To progress, correlations must be decided upon, involving a choice based on risk. The goal is to develop an "UFO PATTERN" or "average behavior" of UFO manifestations. This pattern can then be used to create "predictive models" that can be tested against hypotheses.

#### Theoretical Model Choice

Two principles guide the choice of theoretical models:

1. Principle of Economy (Occam's Razor): The model with the highest validity coefficient is preferred, indicating the best fit to the data.
2. Popper's Principle: The primary criterion for a theory's validity is its "fertility"—its ability to explain the maximum number of facts intelligibly without being disproven.

The approach is described as fundamentally probabilistic and intuitionistic, avoiding the arbitrariness of purely axiomatic systems.

Mathematical Support for Modeling and Validity Analysis

The final section provides a mathematical framework for modeling and analyzing the validity of UFO data. It defines probability spaces and discusses how to construct probability laws based on the intrinsic values (Vi) of reports. The conclusion suggests that while a direct link between the probability law and Vi is not yet established, the framework allows for working with fuzzy sets and correlations under specific conditions of risk and validity.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue of UFOLOGIE CONTACT strongly emphasizes a rigorous, scientific approach to ufology, moving beyond mere anecdotal reporting. The recurring themes are the critical importance of methodology, the application of advanced logical and mathematical tools (intuitionistic logic, fuzzy sets, probability theory), and the development of predictive models. The editorial stance is one of intellectual honesty, acknowledging the inherent difficulties and uncertainties in UFO research while advocating for a systematic and open-minded investigation. The publication aims to provide readers with the tools and theoretical underpinnings to critically analyze UFO phenomena themselves.

This issue of RELAIS Magazine, dated August 10, 1980, is primarily composed of theoretical articles related to ufology and probability, alongside a feature on amateur astronomy. The magazine's overall tone suggests a rigorous, analytical approach to unexplained phenomena, emphasizing scientific methodology and psychological insights.

Conclusion on Probability and Ufology

The concluding section of an article by Thierry PINVIDIC (page 9) posits that by demonstrating that observations can be represented within a probabilistic space, the laws of probability calculation become applicable. This allows for the use of tools like Bayes' theorem to determine the probability associated with any given element. The concept of 'validity coefficient' (Vx) is introduced, which is constantly re-evaluated with new observations. The author suggests that a probabilistic approach through computing could lead to a clearer understanding, filtering good information from noise, analogous to focusing a lens. This informatization of data is presented as the most viable technical path to approximating reality in the paranormal domain.

Notes and References

Pages 10-15 contain a series of numbered notes and references that elaborate on concepts introduced in the main articles. These include references to Marc BEIGBEDER's work, critiques of pure and practical reason, and discussions on sensory filters and communication bottlenecks in social sciences. The concept of 'cluster effect' and 'role effect' in interviews are mentioned. The notes also touch upon the inherent filtering in microphysics and parapsychology, including the 'experimenter effect'. A communication to the ufological congress of Montluçon in 1980 is referenced. The notes delve into the dichotomy of statistical significance and the use of Aristotelian logic. The definition of a UFO (OVNI) is discussed, highlighting the difficulty of a simple binary classification. Technical notes from GEPAN are cited, along with reports from the scientific council of 1978 and 1979. A critique of statistical calculation axioms for human sciences is presented, suggesting that graphical techniques like BLALOCK and BOUDON's recursive systems of linear equations are better suited for visualizing complex inter-relationships.

Study of Psychic Chronology in UFO Observations

An article by Joël LE BRAS (pages 13-16) proposes a method for studying UFO observations through 'psychic chronology'. The author argues that ufology is essentially the study of notifications, and any extrapolation must be based on these. The core of the proposed research is an investigation that first receives the subject's deposition without questions, emphasizing the chronology of events. The article outlines a five-phase psychic process that a subject might undergo when encountering an object they do not immediately recognize:

1. Instant A: Seeing an object whose appearance attracts attention and is not immediately recognized.
2. Analogies: Drawing analogies with known objects.
3. Elimination: Successively eliminating these analogies.
4. Non-recognition: Definitive non-recognition of the object.
5. Instant B: Identification as a UFO.

The crucial interval is between instants A and B. The article stresses that 'immediately' in phase 1 refers to a lack of perceptible delay, with the brain's processing time being minimal. A delay, even if short, means the object is not recognized 'immediately'.

The study of psychic chronology should examine the period before A and B, as well as the interval AB. The moment preceding A is important for understanding the subject's state of mind and what might have drawn their attention. The moment preceding B is critical for understanding the precise behavior of the object that led to the pseudo-identification of a UFO. The author suggests that the difference between someone who sees a UFO and someone who doesn't, under similar circumstances, lies not in the vision itself but in the individual's mentality, implying a predisposition.

Le Bras critiques Monnerie's theory that a UFO arises from an unrecognized familiar scene. He notes that while many people may fail to recognize scenes immediately, they do not report UFOs. This suggests that Monnerie's theory, which implies a predisposition to enter a 'waking dream', might be less convincing when analyzed statistically, especially if multiple subjects report only one observation.

Amateur Astronomy: Building a Telescope in Sallaumines

An article by S. Flanquart (pages 17-18) profiles Henri Riha, an employee at Billy-Montigny, who, with his son Marc, dedicates his leisure time to studying the sky. Driven by a passion for astronomy, Riha decided to build his own telescope in 1977 after being inspired by NASA research and technical magazines. His homemade observatory is located in the courtyard of his home in Sallaumines.

The centerpiece of his apparatus is a parabolic mirror with a 210 mm diameter, precisely ground and polished to a hundredth of a micron. The mirror was purchased in Strasbourg and then painstakingly shaped and polished using various abrasives, including corundum and zirconium, over many hours. This process required a highly precise measurement tool, leading Riha to construct a Foucault apparatus to check the mirror's curvature. The final polishing with zirconium achieved a spherical shape, with further delicate work to flatten the edges for optimal star imaging.

This telescope can magnify objects up to 600 times, offering clarity 1200 times greater than the human eye. At 600x magnification, the moon appears as if viewed from 1 km away. The apparatus allows Riha and his son to observe planets, stars, and nebulae. The construction of the mirror alone took over a hundred hours.

The telescope consists of a tripod with a graduated rotation and ascension movement, electronically controlled. The tube is 1.20 meters long and made of marine plywood. The system is mounted on adjustable supports to avoid vibration. A finder scope (100x magnification) is attached parallel to the main mirror's optical axis. The telescope is equipped with eyepieces of various focal lengths and a camera mount for astrophotography, effectively acting as a large objective lens.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine exhibits a strong interest in the scientific and psychological underpinnings of unexplained phenomena, particularly UFOs. There is a clear emphasis on rigorous methodology, data analysis, and the application of scientific principles, including probability theory and statistics, to these subjects. The exploration of psychological factors in observation and witness testimony is a significant theme. The inclusion of a detailed article on amateur astronomy suggests a broader interest in scientific inquiry and hands-on investigation, contrasting with the more theoretical discussions on ufology. The editorial stance appears to favor a rational, evidence-based approach, seeking to demystify phenomena through systematic study rather than accepting unsubstantiated claims.

This issue of 'OVNI OUTRE ATLANTIQUE' (UFOs Overseas) is identified as issue number 2, published in January 1980, under the volume number 19. The publisher is ICUFON, an organization based in the USA, and the original language of the publication is French.

Main Cover Story: Colman Von Keviczky's Crusade at the House of Lords

The lead article details a presentation given by Colman Von Keviczky on January 29, 1980, to the British House of Lords. Von Keviczky, an American of Hungarian origin, is described as a graduate of the Military Academy Maria Ludovica and a former head of the Royal Hungarian Army's audio-visual service. After serving with the 4th US Army as a cameraman and sound engineer in post-war Germany, he established himself in the US in 1953 and worked with the United Nations Public Relations Service. Upon his retirement in 1966, he dedicated himself to advocating for an international UFO study commission at the UN.

Von Keviczky views UFOs as manifestations of 'hostile intentions' from 'galactic intervention forces,' a perspective the author notes he does not share but acknowledges Von Keviczky's significant role in the UFO cause at the UN. He authored a report titled 'Project WASA' (World Authority for Space Affairs) presented in 1979. The article suggests that Von Keviczky sought to pressure a major country, like England, to push for the creation of WASA, noting Prince Philip's interest in the subject. The presentation at the House of Lords was initiated by the Duke of Clancasty, known in ufological circles as Brinsley Le Poer Trench. The author concludes that the debate on UFOs at the UN appears to be definitively closed, despite Von Keviczky's continued determination and belief in an extraterrestrial invasion.

The article is accompanied by a photograph of Von Keviczky with Herman Oberth in January 1980. The author, Thierry Pinvidic, met Von Keviczky during a previous stay in the US and describes his unwavering belief in an extraterrestrial threat.

ICUFON: Intercontinental U.F.O. Galactic Spacecraft - Research and Analytic Network Inc.

This section provides contact information for ICUFON, with Colman Von Keviczky listed as the Director of the Project. The address is in Jackson Heights, New York. A document detailing Von Keviczky's presentation to the British House of Lords' UFO Committee is mentioned, consisting of 110 slides and lasting 45-50 minutes.

The Problem of Unidentified Flying Objects (UFOs)

Von Keviczky's address to the House of Lords frames the UFO issue as the 'GALACTIC POWERS' EXPLORATORY EARTHBOUND OPERATION.' He states that for over three decades, governments have confronted UFO activity, which he describes as a 'sinister operation' that violates international law and order due to a lack of communication from their 'home base.' He references the 1967 Mainz UFO Resolution, where 24 nations proclaimed that the extraterrestrial origin of UFOs is a vital global problem requiring united research.

Von Keviczky argues that powerful space-exploring entities, realizing UFO exploratory activity is concentrated on energy sources and industrial territories, have alerted their military forces and developed sophisticated strategic arms against these UFOs. He criticizes the 'silent offensive-defense armed confrontation' and the deployment of scientists to 'pacify the public's increasing anxiety' by creating 'deceptive confusion' about UFO origins, such as attributing them to parapsychological phenomena.

He laments that while the world talks about UFOs, no one acts to solve the problem, and governments are 'afraid and formally evading' the evidence. He criticizes the 'WAIT AND SEE' policy and the failure to establish a United Nations UFO Department, despite declassified evidence presented to the UN General Assembly.

The Real Problem: Media Control and Misinformation

Von Keviczky identifies the 'REAL PROBLEM' as 'THE NEWS MEDIA CONTROL, SUPPRESSION AND SILENCE, THE MISINFORMATION OF THE PUBLIC, WILFULL NEGLIGENCE AND THE SENSATION-HUNTING AND MONEY MAKING UFO JOURNALISM.' He quotes Jerome Eden, who characterized 'UFOlogy' as the 'idiot child of the news media and some scientists.' He asserts that aggressive secrecy and political maneuvering capitalize on the global UFO problem for self-benefit.

ICUFON's 1978 Green Memorandum and the 'BLUE' World Authority for Spatial Affairs (WASA) Project reportedly exposed that the responsibility for the UFO problem rests solely with 'THE NATIONS' MILITARY FORCES AND THEIR MILITARY SCIENTISTS.'

Declassification and Military Response

Since 1978, major powers, including the US, Great Britain, France, and Spain, have begun declassifying classic UFO cases. Von Keviczky interprets this as a sign of internal disapproval of armed confrontation with 'Galactic Forces' due to their superior science and technology, validating decades of UFO research.

The First Verified Extraterrestrial Assault Against Military Establishments

On February 25, 1942, a 'Galactic Wing Force' of 15-20 crafts conducted reconnaissance along the US Pacific coast. The area was alerted, and 1430 rounds of ammunition were fired by the 37th Anti-Aircraft Artillery Brigade at alleged 'Japanese warplanes.' The Los Angeles Times published a photograph of two wingless disc-shaped crafts with a halo. ICUFON analysis indicated the guns' fire concentration perfectly covered the target's stern, despite their low speed and altitude, and no bombs were dropped or planes shot down. A SECRET report from Chief of Staff Gen. George C. Marshall to President F.D. Roosevelt verified the photograph's genuineness, referring to the crafts as 'MYSTERIOUS OBJECTS.'

UFO Sightings and Descriptions

The document details various UFO sightings:

  • April 25, 1974: A UFO observed in speedy flight over the 7th U.S. Pacific Fleet base in Honolulu, Hawaii.
  • December 13, 1944: Sir Winston Churchill and Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower publicly declared a strategic warfare against 'THIRD UNIDENTIFIABLE BELLIGERENT' 'THE FLOATING MYSTERY BALLS,' believed to be a Nazi secret weapon.
  • May 1944: A 'Foo-Fighter' was photographed pacing a German Focke-Wulf reconnaissance plane over Karten, Austria.
  • November 13, 1967: A similar craft was observed over Finland, escorting Hannu Pelkonen's car.

A Warning from the Pentagon

Ex-governmental and media-promoted scientists, like Dr. J. Allen Hynek and Jacques Vallee, lecture about the non- or parapsychological existence of UFOs, labeling them 'BEYOND REALITY' and 'PSYCHO-PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA.' This discredited the subject, leading to its removal from the UN agenda.

Von Keviczky juxtaposes this with a declassified 'SUMMARY REPORT on the UFOs' by Commanding General Nathaniel F. Twining, Chief of Staff of the U.S. Air Force, dated September 18, 1947. This report stated that the phenomenon is 'REAL AND NOT VISIONARY OR FICTITIOUS.'

Evidences from the Twining Report:

  • March 28, 1974, Cincinnati, Ohio: Dome-shaped craft observed.
  • April 3, 1974, Shimonosheki, Japan: Disc-shaped craft over the Kanmon Bridge.
  • May 7, 1952, Barra da Tijuca, Brazil: Round-shaped object, 65 meters in diameter, analyzed as 'unearthly origin.'
  • May 23, 1971, St. Lorenzen, Austria: Disc-shaped craft, approximately 25-30 meters in diameter, described as 'large as a man-made aircraft.'

Operating Characteristics:

The report details 'EXTREME RATE OF CLIMB, MANEUVERABILITY.' Evidence includes a zig-zag trajectory observed over 7-10 minutes, with altitude and distance reconstructed.

Controlled Objects:

  • February 26, 1965, Silver Springs, MD: An 8mm moviefilm showed a craft with retracting landing gear and a moving center mechanism, indicating intelligent control. This film was presented to NASA and the Pentagon, with AF Col. George P. Freeman calling it 'the best film I have seen yet.' This affirmed a 1953 Department of Defense issue stating that 'if the apparently controlled maneuvers reported by many competent observers (military personnel) are correct, then the only remaining explanation is the interplanetary answer.'

Apparent Common Description:

Objects are described as having a 'METALLIC OR LIGHT REFLECTING SURFACE.'

Further Evidences and Incidents

  • July 17, 1974, Belotic, Yugoslavia: Glistening blue color, 'metallic and light reflecting surface.'
  • January 7, 1948, Godman AF Base, Kentucky, USA: The first publicly known UFO disaster. Capt. Thomas A. Mantell reported the craft 'looks METALLIC and of TREMENDOUS SIZE' before crashing.
  • October 18, 1973, Mansfield AF Base, Columbus, Ohio, USA: Lt. Col. Lawrence Coyne described a grey metallic structure, 50-60 feet long, with a green light emanating from the undercarriage.
  • October 21, 1978, Melbourne, Australia: Frederick Valentich reported a craft with a green light and a 'sort of METALLIC light on the outside.'
  • May 21, 1953: A crashed UFO at Kingman, Arizona, was analyzed as constructed of 'dull silvery METAL.'
  • November 17, 1974, Viborg, Denmark: A 'dull silvery' object was photographed.

The author questions the lack of official investigation for 30 years, leaving the issue to hobbyists.

Absence of Trail

Except in a few instances, UFOs do not leave trails, indicating operation under high performance conditions.

  • June 5, 1956, Namuer, Belgium: A disc-shaped craft observed at higher altitude with a condensation tail.
  • March 25, 1975, Ochta Ward, Tokyo, Japan: A gray cigar-shaped object spitting orange fire.

Shape Descriptions

Objects are described as 'CIRCULAR OR ELLIPTICAL IN SHAPE, FLAT ON BOTTOM AND DOMED ON TOP.'

  • May 11, 1952, McMinville, Oregon, USA: A shield-shaped craft with a flat bottom and a periscope-like protrusion.
  • March 7, 1977, Hasseldorfer March, Germany: A craft of similar type, with a transparent periscope-like part, estimated diameter 15 meters.
  • June 30, 1952, Bernina Alps, Italy: An elliptical-shaped craft with a dome on top, similar to the Kingman UFO.

Formation Flights

Reports of 'WELL KEPT FORMATION FLIGHTS VARYING FROM THREE TO NINE OBJECTS' are noted:

  • March 5, 1956: "U" turn over Hawaii (A FLIGHT!)
  • June 30, 1954: Labrador, Canada (A SQUADRON!)
  • August 31, 1951: Lubbock, Texas (A WING!)
  • September 7, 1966: Mannheim, Germany (A DIVISION!)
  • March 16, 1977: Vasteras, Sweden (A WING FORCE!)
  • August 5, 1973: Montreal, Canada (A WING FORCE!)
  • August 12th and 13th, 1883: 447 crafts passing between Earth and Sun (A UFO ARMADA!)

Level Flight Speeds

Speeds are estimated 'NORMALLY ABOVE 300 KNOTES.'

  • Summer, 1966, Switzerland: Two orange colored 'balls' in a speedy flight at an estimated 300 knots, at a low altitude of -150 meters.

The Undeclared War

An investigation by US military and civilian intelligence in 1952, following the Washington D.C. UFO flap, led President Harry S. Truman and his Chief of Staff, Gen. Omar N. Bradley, to declare 'SUB ROSA' war against 'Unidentified Flying Objects' or 'Galactic Powers.' The reason cited was the 'illegal strategic reconnaissance' by UFO Forces, posing a threat to 'THEIR NATIONAL SECURITY.'

The US Joint Chiefs of Staff's order JANAP 146 (1952), extended in 1966 to include Canadian Forces and NATO, remains in force. A declassified CIA memorandum confirms a 'WORLD WIDE REPORTING SYSTEM' and that 'MAJOR AIR FORCE BASES HAVE BEEN ORDERED TO MAKE INTERCEPTIONS OF UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECTS.'

Secret Inter-Office Memorandum

An AF secret inter-office Memorandum from October 20, 1969, stated: 'REPORTS OF UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECTS WHICH COULD AFFECT NATIONAL SECURITY ARE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH JANAP 146 OR AIR FORCE MANUAL 55-11, AND ARE NOT PART OF THE PROJECT BLUE BOOK SYSTEM.'

Grave Violations of National and International Security

  • October 12 and 19, 1973: A Grand Maneuver of UFO Forces occurred between the Gulf of Mexico and the Great Lakes.
  • October 17, 1973, Alabama: An alien creature was photographed by a Chief of Police in Falkville, an area near the Redstone Arsenal. The incident was debunked as a hoax, and the policeman was forced to resign.
  • August 21, 1955, Sutton Farm Case, Kentucky: A textbook describes 'homo cosmicus' wearing 'BULLETPROOF DRESS.' The Suttons fired at creatures described as three and a half feet tall with large round heads and long arms.

Leonard Stringfield reportedly documented eight crashed or shot-down Galactic Spacecrafts and their crew corpses (about 25) are deep frozen in crates at Wright Patterson Air Force Base.

  • October-November, 1975: Missile bases, ammunition depots, and other security installations were assaulted by alleged 'UNIDENTIFIED HELICOPTERS.'
  • September 19, 1976, Iran: An F-4 interceptor was assaulted by a disc-shaped craft, causing the pilot's weapons control panel to malfunction and communications to be lost.
  • 1974, Sardinia Island: Missiles launched from a NATO base were annihilated by a 'ray-gun happy' disc-shaped craft.
  • Fall 1974, Binn, Korea: An oval-shaped metallic disc destroyed a Hawk missile launcher with a beam-light shot, melting it down.

These cases highlight the 'total armed insufficiency of our earthly defenses' compared to the 'scientific and technological supremacy' of the Galactic Task Forces.

NORAD's Admission and Global Airspace Violations

The North American Air Defense Command (NORAD) admitted that their sensors detect DAILY ABOUT 800-900 OBJECTS whose flight characteristics do not resemble satellites or have usual ballistic trajectories. The article estimates that 'EVERY HOUR 3 OBJECT OF EXTRA-TERRESTRIAL ORIGIN VIOLATES ILLEGALLY OUR GLOBAL AIRSPACE.'

The Potential Threat

Aerial vehicles intruding illegally over sovereign airspace affect national security. UFO Forces, as 'illegal intruders,' are subject to legal armed action in the absence of international UN regulations.

  • May 1960: A US U-2 reconnaissance plane was shot down in the USSR.

Von Keviczky criticizes the inconsistency of Project Blue Book's statement that 'NO UFO REPORTED, INVESTIGATED AND EVALUATED BY THE AIR FORCE HAS EVER GIVEN ANY INDICATION OF THREAT TO OUR NATIONAL SECURITY.'

The Visitors and Saviors

The article questions the notion of UFOs as 'peaceful visitors' or 'saviors,' given their decades-long neglect to contact official representations and their failure to solve any of humanity's problems. It criticizes the selection of 'CONTACTEES' for communication, who are often not qualified.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the perceived extraterrestrial threat posed by UFOs, the alleged secrecy and misinformation employed by governments and media, and the military's preparedness (or lack thereof) to counter this threat. The editorial stance, primarily through the voice of Colman Von Keviczky, is one of alarm and urgency, advocating for international cooperation and transparency in addressing what is presented as a critical issue for global security. The author, Thierry Pinvidic, while presenting Von Keviczky's views, also interjects his own skepticism regarding Von Keviczky's absolute conviction of hostile intent, suggesting a nuanced perspective on the UFO phenomenon.

This document, issue number 29, appears to be a publication from the "UFO Task Force" or a related entity, focusing on the perceived threat of UFOs and potential extraterrestrial intelligence. The content is primarily text-based, with no significant visual elements beyond a diagram on page 6.

Main Content

The issue opens with a discussion of the "UFO Task Forces" and their concerns that national military staffs could not ignore the possibility of "silent" sinister forces intervening in global conflicts. A quote from Lord Kimberley in the House of Lords on January 18, 1979, states, "WE KNOW THAT WAR IN SPACE ONCE A FIGMENT OF THE IMAGINATION IS VERY NEARLY A FACT NOW." This is followed by a similar warning from Michael A.G. Mishoud of the U.S. State Department in June 1978, who stated, "ALIENS FROM OTHER SOLAR SYSTEMS ARE A POTENTIAL THREAT TO US, AND WE ARE A POTENTIAL THREAT TO THEM." The author endorses the latter part of this statement as a warning to governments.

The core of the document is a proposal titled "MOTION TO THE NATIONS," originating from ICUFON (International Council of UFO Organizations), which has reportedly been working on this issue for three decades. ICUFON suggests that to address the UFO problem, military secrecy on the UFO level should be lifted, which would open a path to solutions without compromising national military secrecy. This proposal, detailed in a "BLUE MEMORANDUM-PROJECT," was submitted to the British government and presented to other nations.

The first phase of this motion would be the voluntary alliance of initiating nations into a "WORLD AUTHORITY FOR SPATIAL AFFAIRS (WASA)." This international space security and scientific establishment would be founded "BY THE NATIONS AND FOR THE NATIONS" on publicly donated ground territory. WASA would be governed by associated nations and comprise representatives from:

  • THE MILITARY FORCES: responsible for global security.
  • SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY: responsible for expertise.
  • UFO RESEARCH PIONEERS (organizations): responsible for research and public liaison.

The World Authority for Spatial Affairs Project is dedicated to international peace, security, and mutual cooperation for the benefit of all nations and the United Nations Organization.

  • Its functions would be:
  • A/ Global control of UFO operations to secure expert analysis and information for nations.
  • B/ Seeking ways to contact and communicate with exploring UFO forces operating within Earth's air and environmental space.
  • C/ Educating a space age generation to face the problem of ETI (Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence) for governments and administrations.

Colman S. VonKeviczky, Director of ICUFON Inc. USA, concludes with a statement made in 1977 at the First International UFO Congress in Acapulco, Mexico: "THE HOUR HAND ON THE PAGES OF MANKIND'S HISTORY IS VERY LATE. THE OPPORTUNITY TO RISE TO THE OCCASION AND ACT ON THE WORLD PEACE AND SECURITY OF THE NATIONS IS INDEED SUBLIMELY GREAT, AND MAY IT NEVER OCCUR AGAIN IN OUR LIFETIME."

Following this, a list of "JOINT UFO RESEARCH ORGANIZATIONS" is provided, detailing various groups across Europe, America, and the Far East, along with their contact information. Notable organizations include DUIST (Germany), IGAPE (Denmark), GEOS (France), SBI (USA), and representatives from Latin America and Japan.

Walter Zabawski, ICUFON Public Relations, is also listed.

Pages 3, 4, and 5 list numerous "BULLETINS OU REVUES" (Bulletins or Reviews) that the publication receives periodically. These are primarily UFO-related newsletters and magazines from various countries, including France, Belgium, Switzerland, Luxembourg, Canada, and the USA. This section serves as a directory of contemporary UFO publications.

Page 5 also details the "S.E.P.S.E." (Société Parisienne d'Etude des Phénomènes Spatiaux et Etranges), an amateur research organization founded in 1901. It outlines their aspirations to develop intellectual faculties through the study of space sciences and to investigate spatial and strange phenomena. Their bureau includes Gilles Richard (President), Raymond Bonnaventure (Secretary), and Chantal Bonnaventure (Treasurer). Their activities involve research, reflection, discussions, and the establishment of working groups, including UFO and Astro sections.

Page 6 contains a diagram that appears to be an artistic representation or schematic of a UFO-like object.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance The recurring themes are the perceived threat posed by UFOs and potential extraterrestrial intelligence, the need for international cooperation to address this issue, and the call for transparency through the lifting of military secrecy concerning UFO phenomena. The editorial stance is one of urgency, advocating for proactive measures and a unified global approach to what is presented as a significant threat to civilization and world peace.