UFO - 1998 No 1 No 2

Magazine Overview

This is a 100-page anniversary issue of UFO NORGE, celebrating 25 years of the organization and its special publication on UFO phenomena. The issue, dated 1-2/1998, marks the 17th year of publication for the magazine UFO. It is described as Norway's only special journal on UFO phenomena.

History and Evolution of UFO Organizations in Norway

The issue delves into the history of UFO organizations in Norway, starting with the initiative by Kolbjørn Stenødegård in Trondheim in late 1972 to unite UFO groups. This led to the formation of Norsk UFO Center (NUFOC), with Bergen UFO Forening, led by Finn W. Kalvik, being an early member. Mentz D. Kaarbø is also mentioned as a key figure from this period. The publication of UFO Forum began in 1972/1973, followed by Rapportnytt. NUFOC established itself as Norway's first nationwide UFO organization.

The narrative traces the growth and challenges of these organizations, including the establishment of regional sections (Øst, Midt, Vest, Sør, Nord). The period from 1978-1980 is described as hyperactive for NUFOC. The text also details the eventual split and the formation of NIVFO (Norsk Institutt for Vitenskapelig Forskning og Opplysning) by K. Stenødegård after a conflict in 1980-1981, which was characterized by a more skeptical stance towards UFOs.

In 1982, UFO-NORGE was relaunched, merging with the former Lillestrøm section and aiming for a more grounded, evidence-based approach. The issue highlights the ongoing efforts of UFO-NORGE to provide a nuanced and serious publication for its readers.

Key UFO Sightings and Investigations

The magazine features several notable UFO incidents and investigations:

• Rørvik Sighting (October 1972): Pål Dekkerhus reported observing a luminous, half-moon-shaped object for five minutes. The object moved towards his car, hovered at low altitude (approx. 40 meters), and then ascended rapidly. The object was estimated to be about 10 meters in diameter and emitted a bright light and what appeared to be smoke or steam.
• Trondheim Sighting (New Year's Eve 1972): Gotfred Tande-Petersen, a former aircraft mechanic, observed a large, silent, metallic craft with clear windows and blue flames from its underside. The craft hovered for several minutes before accelerating away at high speed. This sighting was later discussed in the context of debunking attempts by the publication 'Astronomisk Tidsskrift'.
• Project Hessdalen: Initiated in 1983 by UFO-NORGE, UFO-Sverige, and Organisasjonen för Psykobiofysik, this project involved extensive research into the Hessdalen phenomenon. It included the installation of a monitoring station and hosted visits from prominent figures like Prof. J. Allen Hynek. The project resulted in publications and reports, including a book by Leif Havik.

Analysis of UFO Reports (Project Blue Book)

An article by Kolbjørn Stenødegård analyzes the classification and analysis of UFO reports, drawing heavily on data from the US Air Force's Project Blue Book. It details how, in the first five years (1947-1952), 1593 reports were examined. The classification breakdown included:

• Ballonger (Balloons): 1.57% identified, 4.99% probable, 11.95% possible.
• Fly (Aircraft): 0.98% identified, 7.74% probable, 3.04% possible.
• Astronomiske legemer (Astronomical objects): 2.79% identified, 4.01% probable, 7.40% possible.
• Andre (Others - e.g., spotlights, atmospheric phenomena): 4.21% identified.
• Bedrag (Hoaxes): 4.66% identified.
• Rapporter med utilstrekkelige data (Reports with insufficient data): 22.72%.
• UKJENT (Unknown): 26.94%.

The article highlights that even in the 'possible' or 'unknown' categories, researchers often felt they had identified the reported UFO. It also notes that a significant portion of reports came from pilots, scientists, and military personnel. The analysis points out that 70% of unknown sightings were observed visually from the air, 12% from the ground, and 8% were combined radar and visual observations. Interestingly, twice as many reports came from female observers as from male observers, though men reported unknown objects at a higher rate (10:1) when it came to specific unknown cases. The study also found unusual patterns in the frequency and geographical distribution of sightings, with peaks in July and just before Christmas, and a tendency for sightings to occur near areas of 'technical interest' rather than major military installations.

Editorial Stance and Themes

The magazine's editorial stance, as reflected in the articles, is one of serious, evidence-based investigation into UFO phenomena. It criticizes attempts to dismiss UFO reports outright, particularly those that rely on conventional explanations without adequately addressing the unexplained cases. The publication emphasizes the importance of an open mind while demanding rigorous scientific methodology. There is a clear advocacy for the scientific study of UFOs and a frustration with skepticism that ignores credible evidence. The issue also touches upon the challenges faced by UFO researchers, including a lack of official support and the potential for ridicule.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the history and development of UFO organizations in Norway, the documentation and analysis of significant UFO sightings, and the critical examination of conventional explanations versus the unexplained aspects of the phenomenon. The editorial stance is strongly in favor of continued, serious research into UFOs, advocating for an open yet scientifically rigorous approach. The magazine positions itself as a platform for presenting credible reports and fostering a deeper understanding of the UFO phenomenon, while also critiquing dismissive attitudes and debunking efforts that fail to account for the truly anomalous cases.

This issue of Norsk UFO Forum, number 4 from 1973, focuses heavily on a significant UFO investigation in Djupsjøen near Røros, Norway. The magazine, published by Norsk UFO Forum, presents a detailed account of the search operation, witness testimonies, and critical analysis of media coverage and the broader UFO phenomenon.

Leteaksjonen i Djupsjøen ved Røros (The Djupsjøen Search Operation near Røros)

The lead article details the extensive search operation conducted in Djupsjøen to find an alleged unidentified flying object (UFO) that was believed to have crashed. The operation, which involved frogmen and sonar equipment, covered an area of approximately 300x200 meters. Despite the efforts, no conventional object was found on the lakebed, though some sonar readings were registered and later identified as stones. The article highlights the numerous challenges faced, including bad weather and last-minute cancellations by participants, which significantly reduced the available time and manpower. The support provided by Aqua Marin A/S, a diving company, and the use of borrowed equipment from Røros elektrisitetsverk were crucial for the operation's completion.

The investigation was led by K. Stenødegård. The article notes that the search involved meticulous staking out of the lakebed and visual inspection using a submersible sled with a searchlight. The use of sonar equipment was also employed to detect objects beneath the mud.

Media Coverage and Criticism

The Djupsjøen investigation attracted considerable media attention, with journalists from various publications present. The magazine expresses disappointment with the sensationalist and inaccurate reporting by some newspapers, particularly Dagbladet. It criticizes Dagbladet for its "reportage" which it deemed a "lame and poorly placed attempt at "humor"" and for misrepresenting facts, such as the mention of a "milk separator" as the only find. The article contrasts this with the more factual reporting by Adresseavisen.

Bernhard Sollie's 1947 Sighting

A significant portion of the issue is dedicated to the account of Bernhard Sollie, who, nine years prior to the investigation, witnessed an object land on Djupsjøen. In late August 1947, while working on his farm, Sollie and his farmhand Harald Engvik observed an egg-shaped object moving at high speed, which then made a controlled landing on the lake. Sollie described the object as about two meters long and one and a half meters wide/high, with a steel-grey, shiny surface and two small "wings" on the sides. He noted that the object floated on the water and then disappeared. Sollie and Engvik initially kept the sighting secret. Sollie later became a local politician and shared his story, which eventually led to the investigations by the Trondheim UFO-Forening in 1967 and the subsequent search in Djupsjøen.

Røros Sighting from 1946

The magazine also reports on a sighting from Røros in August 1946, approximately one year before Sollie's experience. Rolf Wintervold, an employee at Arbeidets Rett newspaper, observed a peculiar "ring of smoke" moving over Røros town. The object was described as moving at a good speed but without any apparent means of propulsion, and it dissipated over time.

Namsenfjorden Sighting (1973)

Another detailed account comes from Captain Erling Bakke, who, along with his wife, observed a strange object in Namsenfjorden in July 1973. Bakke, initially skeptical of UFOs, described the object as black, approximately 25 feet long and 6 feet high, with no visible openings or windows. It hovered silently a few feet above the water before accelerating rapidly and disappearing. Bakke noted that the object reacted to his gestures and that his wife also witnessed the event.

Hønefoss Sighting (1973)

Sessan Balstad, a resident of Hønefoss, reported multiple nights of close encounters with a UFO in July 1973. She described the object as hovering about 30 meters away and 6-7 meters above the ground, reacting strongly to light by reversing its position. Balstad believed the occupants were trying to make contact. She also observed what appeared to be three objects and noted their silent operation and unusual maneuvers. Her account was discussed on the radio program "Ni-timen".

Other Sightings and UFO Phenomena

The issue also includes reports of other sightings in the Ringerike and Oslo areas, with witnesses describing strange lights and objects behaving erratically. The magazine discusses the challenges of UFO research, including the need for rigorous investigation and the tendency for media to sensationalize reports. It also touches upon the psychological aspects of witness testimony and the potential for misinterpretation of natural phenomena.

UFOs and Folklore

In a section titled "Folklore og UFO" (Folklore and UFO), K. Stenødegård explores the connection between modern UFO sightings and ancient myths and legends. He references Jacques Vallée's book "Passport to Magonia," which draws parallels between medieval tales of "otherworldly beings" and contemporary UFO encounters. The article suggests that these stories, whether about "Magonia," "Alvenes rike" (the realm of elves), or UFOs, might represent a common underlying theme of encounters with intelligent beings from unknown origins.

NUFOC Commentary

Norsk UFO Center (NUFOC) provides commentary on the reported cases, emphasizing the importance of detailed, firsthand accounts from credible witnesses. They highlight the unusual nature of the Hønefoss sighting, where the object reacted to signals, and note the difficulty in verifying such accounts when there is only a single witness.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the detailed investigation of alleged UFO incidents, the critical examination of media reporting on UFOs, and the exploration of the broader implications of these phenomena, including their potential links to folklore and historical accounts. The editorial stance is one of serious inquiry, aiming to establish facts through investigation rather than succumbing to sensationalism or dismissing reports outright. The magazine advocates for a scientific approach to UFO research, encouraging the collection of detailed, verifiable data and criticizing the tendency to dismiss witness accounts without proper investigation.

Title: Norsk UFO Forum
Issue: 1-2/98
Date: 1974 (cover date for the first article, subsequent articles span up to 1977)
Publisher: Norsk UFO Forum
Country: Norway
Language: Norwegian

This issue of Norsk UFO Forum delves into various aspects of UFO phenomena, from the organization of research to specific case studies and scientific perspectives. It features articles by prominent figures in the UFO community and discusses significant events and publications.

Article 1: DET ORGANISERTE UFO-ARBEIDET - NOEN BETRAKTNINGER (The Organized UFO Work - Some Considerations)

By Jacques Vallée

This article, an excerpt from Jacques Vallée's book 'Passport to Magonia,' critiques the prevailing methods of UFO research. Vallée argues that large, formal UFO organizations are often inefficient, wasting resources and energy on administrative tasks rather than on actual investigation. He suggests that these groups primarily serve a psychological need for believers rather than a genuine pursuit of knowledge. Vallée advocates for the establishment of numerous small, informal study groups focused on collecting firsthand data rapidly and publishing it freely. He emphasizes the importance of local researchers in assessing the credibility of UFO sightings, as external observers lack the context and understanding of local conditions.

Vallée concludes that neither massive, collaborative projects nor computer analysis of vast datasets can solve the UFO problem. Instead, progress depends on the publication of good, firsthand reports that are collected quickly and circulated freely. He highlights the need for field researchers across the country.

Article 2: FOLKLORE OG UFO (Folklore and UFO)

This section, continuing from a previous page, discusses Jacques Vallée's book 'Passport to Magonia.' The author suggests that Vallée's work addresses a fundamental human need for answers that science has not yet provided, and that the modern sense of loneliness contributes to the emotional energy directed towards finding a place like 'Magonia'—a utopia inhabited by benevolent beings.

The article praises Vallée's contribution to UFO literature, calling his book highly relevant and indispensable for UFO students. It provides the publication details: 'Passport to Magonia' by Jacques Vallée, published by Neville Spearman, London, 1970.

Article 3: SENATOR BARRY GOLDWATER INN I STYRET HOS NICAP (Senator Barry Goldwater Joins NICAP's Board)

This article reports on Senator Barry Goldwater of Arizona joining the board of NICAP (National Investigation Committee on Aerial Phenomena), a prominent private UFO research organization. Goldwater publicly stated his belief in extraterrestrial spacecraft and his acceptance of a leading role in NICAP. He expressed his conviction that Earth is not the only planet harboring intelligent life and that humans are not the most intelligent beings in the universe.

The article quotes Goldwater mentioning reports from pilots who have witnessed UFOs at close range, disappearing at incredible speeds. He also recounts his unsuccessful attempts, as a senator, to access UFO research archives at Wright Patterson Air Force Base, suggesting a secret leadership is withholding information. NICAP leader John L. Acuff commends Goldwater's courage and willingness to take a stand on the controversial UFO topic.

Article 4: BEYOND EARTH: Man's Contact with UFOs

By K. Stenødegård

This section reviews the book 'Beyond Earth: Man's Contact with UFOs' by Ralph and Judy Blum. The book is described as a serious contribution to UFO literature, avoiding sensationalism and focusing on factual accounts. It highlights that 15 million Americans believe they have seen UFOs, and the authors, both with strong academic backgrounds, present authentic observations from trained professionals.

The review details the Pascagoula incident of October 11, 1973, where Charles Hickson and Calvin Parker reported an encounter with humanoid beings from an egg-shaped craft. The book also discusses the Betty Hill star map and touches upon government attitudes towards UFOs, including the Condon Report and Project Blue Book.

The reviewer recommends the book as a valuable resource for UFO enthusiasts.

Article 5: UFO - EN DOKUMENTASJON (UFO - A Documentation)

By Professor J. Allen Hynek

This is a review of the Norwegian translation of J. Allen Hynek's book, 'The UFO Experience.' The reviewer, K. Stenødegård, praises the book as a definitive work by a leading expert in the field. Hynek, a former scientific consultant for Project Blue Book, is presented as a highly qualified astronomer who has dedicated over 35 years to studying UFO phenomena.

The article details Hynek's background and his critical stance on official UFO investigations, particularly Project Blue Book, which he describes as superficial and lacking in scientific rigor. Hynek's book is noted for its systematic approach, presenting well-documented cases, many drawn from Blue Book archives, that meet his strict criteria (e.g., multiple witnesses). The reviewer emphasizes that Hynek's work clarifies many confusing aspects of the UFO phenomenon, offering a clearer perspective.

The review highlights Hynek's comparison of the UFO issue to the Watergate scandal, calling the government's handling of UFOs a 'cosmic Watergate.' The book is highly recommended as an essential resource for anyone interested in UFOs.

Article 6: UFO-GALSKAP OVER AMERIKA (UFO Madness Over America)

By K. Stenødegård

This article describes a UFO cult operating in America, led by a couple known as 'The Two' (or 'Bo and Peep,' 'Him and Her'). These leaders persuade followers to give up their possessions and families, promising a new life on another planet via UFO transport. The cult leaders, identified as Marshall Herff Applewhite and Bonnie Lu Trusdale Nettle, are described as having a strong psychological influence over their followers, who are made to act like robots.

The article mentions a specific incident in Newport, Oregon, where 20 people disappeared after attending a meeting led by the couple. The authorities are concerned but find it difficult to intervene as the activities are technically legal. The leaders claim to be from another planet and that their followers will be taken to a higher kingdom. The article notes that Applewhite and Nettle were previously arrested for check fraud. It also draws a parallel to the Heaven's Gate mass suicide in 1997, which was led by 'Bo' (Applewhite).

Article 7: SATELITTSPORINGSSTASJON MOTTOK INTELLIGENTE SIGNALER - NASA GJØR ALT FOR Å HEMMELIGHOLDE (Satellite Tracking Station Received Intelligent Signals - NASA Does Everything to Keep it Secret)

This article discusses a 1973 report by Duncan Lunan of the British Interplanetary Society, who claimed a spacecraft within lunar orbit was attempting to communicate via radio signals, possibly originating from the Bootes star system. Lunan theorized a catastrophe on the spacecraft's home planet 13,000 years prior. Subsequent investigations by Samuel Kaplan and later by radio engineers Anthony Lawton and Sidney Newton, using a large satellite tracking antenna, failed to confirm Lunan's findings, attributing any detected echoes to natural phenomena.

The article then shifts to a report from October 1965, where technicians at a radio telescope in South Africa reportedly received an inexplicably powerful, unexplainable transmission from space that overloaded their equipment. The signal's origin was unclear, but the event was linked to a strange course correction by the Mariner 4 probe. Geof Gray Cobb, an eyewitness and author of the report, details how data tapes from this event were later found to be missing from NASA archives, with the station chief indicating they were ordered removed by two men.

Article 8: VITENSKAPELIG UTFORDRING (Scientific Challenge)

This article summarizes a study conducted by Professor Peter Sturrock of Stanford University, who surveyed 2611 scientists, primarily astronomers, about their views on UFOs. The results indicated that 80% of the astronomers believed the UFO phenomenon warranted serious study and were willing to participate, though many lacked ideas on how to proceed. 13% felt they had good methods for tackling the problem. Notably, 62% of the surveyed scientists reported having personally seen or registered events they associated with UFOs.

Sturrock also interviewed researchers involved in the Condon Project and Project Blue Book, uncovering significant disagreements among them regarding the nature and existence of the UFO phenomenon. While some scientists expressed openness to studying the phenomenon without preconceptions, others dismissed it as nonsense. The article concludes by expressing hope for a more serious scientific approach to UFO research.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue of Norsk UFO Forum include the critical evaluation of UFO research methodologies, the importance of credible data collection and dissemination, and the skepticism or openness of scientific and governmental institutions towards the UFO phenomenon. The editorial stance appears to favor serious, evidence-based investigation and is critical of both overly organized, bureaucratic approaches and dismissive attitudes from mainstream science and authorities. There is a clear advocacy for independent research and the sharing of findings.

Themes: UFO Organization, UFO Investigation, UFO Sightings, UFO Cults, Scientific Study of UFOs, Folklore and UFOs, Government Secrecy, UFO Evidence.

Tags: UFO, aliens, extraterrestrial, investigation, organization, science, research, sightings, cults, phenomenon, evidence, reports, analysis, documentation, skepticism, Pascagoula, Espevær, Jacques Vallée, J. Allen Hynek, Barry Goldwater, NICAP, Project Blue Book, folklore, conspiracy, space, signals.

Time Period: Primarily 1970s, with references to earlier events and a mention of a 1997 event.

Page Title: Norsk UFO Forum 1-2/98: UFOs, Aliens & Mysteries

Cover Description: The cover features a drawing of a UFO hovering over a landscape with a person looking up, and the main headline 'DET ORGANISERTE UFO-ARBEIDET - NOEN BETRAKTNINGER' by Av Jaques Vallée.

Meta Description: Explore UFO investigations, sightings, and theories in Norsk UFO Forum issue 1-2/98, featuring articles on organized UFO work, Senator Goldwater, the Pascagoula incident, and the Espevær mystery.

Key Facts Synopsis: This issue of Norsk UFO Forum discusses the organization of UFO research, advocating for small, informal study groups over large formal ones. It highlights Senator Barry Goldwater's involvement with NICAP and his belief in extraterrestrial visitors. The magazine reviews books on UFOs, including 'Beyond Earth' detailing the Pascagoula abduction and J. Allen Hynek's 'UFO - En dokumentasjon' which critiques Project Blue Book. It also covers the Espevær imprint incident, initially speculated to be a UFO landing site, but later attributed by some to witch circles, though this was contested.

Notable Quote: "Det eneste som kan bidra til framskritt i retning av en bedre forståelse for fenomenet er å publisere gode rapporter. De må være førstehåndrapporter. De må samles inn raskt og publiseres raskt. De må sirkulere fritt."

Notable Quote Speaker: Jacques Vallée

FAQ:

• Question: What is the main criticism of large UFO organizations? Answer: Large, formal UFO organizations are criticized for wasting energy and money, serving psychological needs rather than finding answers, and creating internal conflicts that hinder research.
• Question: What is the recommended approach for UFO research? Answer: The recommended approach is to establish a large number of small, informal study groups whose sole objective is to collect firsthand data quickly and publish it freely.
• Question: What was the Pascagoula incident? Answer: The Pascagoula incident involved two men, Charles Hickson and Calvin Parker, who reported being abducted by aliens from a landed UFO in 1973.
• Question: What was the Espevær imprint? Answer: The Espevær imprint was a large, oval mark found in the ground on the island of Espevær, Norway, in April 1976, which was initially speculated to be from a UFO landing.
• Question: What is J. Allen Hynek's view on Project Blue Book? Answer: J. Allen Hynek, a prominent UFO researcher, is critical of Project Blue Book, citing its superficiality, lack of competence, and interest in the subject, and its tendency to dismiss cases with conventional explanations without proper investigation.

This issue of Rapportnytt, dated October 25, 1977, focuses on a significant UFO sighting and landing in Åsbygda, Norway. The cover headline proclaims "FOREIGN AIRCRAFT ON A 'FRENCH VISIT' IN ÅSBYGDA". The issue details witness accounts, scientific investigations, and related UFO phenomena from various locations.

The Åsbygda Landing

The main article recounts the events of Tuesday, October 25, 1977, when two 14-year-old boys, Johnny Myhr and Frank Sverre Mandt, witnessed a UFO land in a field near Alm school in Åsbygda. The object, described as light green and round with possible vents, landed briefly before ascending and disappearing over a ridge. The boys reported seeing a possible figure inside a vent. The object left three distinct circular imprints in the freshly plowed field, measuring approximately 10-15 cm deep with a diameter of 6.60 meters between them.

Later that evening, around 10 minutes after the boys' sighting, a school employee also observed a brightly lit, round object moving slowly and silently over the treetops. This sighting occurred around the same time the moon rose.

Scientific Investigation by NUFOC

On October 27, 1977, NUFOC (Norsk UFO Forum) representatives, including Dag Heim and Kjell Christensen, investigated the landing site. Due to darkness, initial investigations were limited, but on Thursday morning, measurements, soil samples, and photographs were taken. A Geiger counter brought by representatives from Forsvaret (The Armed Forces) and Helgelandsmoen registered no unusual activity.

Kjell Christensen conducted pH tests on the soil samples. The pH-value inside the imprints was found to be 4.7, while the surrounding soil had a pH of 5.3 (15 meters outside the imprint). This difference, along with findings from previous investigations of suspected UFO landings at Espevær and Høyjord, led NUFOC to conclude that something unusual had occurred. Based on the imprints, the craft's largest diameter was estimated at approximately 12 meters, with a cabin height of about 6.5 meters. Plaster casts of the imprints revealed a slight U-shape.

Reports from Tom Runar Lemb and Dag Heim to the local police have led to the military taking over the investigation.

Related Sightings and Theories

Other Norwegian Sightings

The issue also reports on other UFO sightings in Norway. On Saturday, November 5, 1977, several people in Åsbygda reported seeing mysterious objects in the sky. Among them were Willy Ruud and Steinar Dalbu, both experienced with aircraft, who confirmed the objects were not conventional planes.

Eyewitness Øyvind Torp described a bright light moving at high speed from south to north on the same Tuesday evening. Another report mentions a UFO seen from Vikersund that appeared to shave the roof of a neighbor's house.

The Petrozavodsk Incident

An article details a significant UFO event in Petrozavodsk, Russia, on September 20, 1977. A large, luminous object, described as a glass jellyfish and the size of a football field, terrorized the city for about 12 minutes. It emitted fine golden streams of light that reportedly burned holes in windowpanes and paving stones. Hundreds of witnesses reported the phenomenon. The Soviet government initiated a secret scientific investigation. Reports from Tass editors and Soviet scientists suggested the object might be an extraterrestrial spacecraft. Physicists Vladimir Azhazha and Aleksander Kozantsev described the object's size and the damage it caused. The incident was also reported by The Enquirer magazine.

UFOs and Pseudo-Science

A section titled "FORSKERE BEKJEMPER KVASIVITENSKAP" (Researchers Combat Pseudo-Science) discusses the rise of pseudo-scientific fields like astrology and UFO theories, which have become a large industry. It mentions an organization in the USA called Zetetic, comprising scientists and illusionists, dedicated to debunking such claims. The article critiques claims made by figures like Erich von Daniken and Uri Geller, stating their "miracles" have been disproven. NUFOC's commentary on this article criticizes the journalist for a lack of understanding of serious UFO research and for potentially misrepresenting the efforts of scientific organizations.

Margit Sandemo's Theory

Author Margit Sandemo proposes a new UFO theory, suggesting that UFOs might originate from one of Jupiter's moons. She bases this on the idea that Jupiter might be a dying sun, making its moons potentially habitable. She also references Jeane Dixon's past predictions about UFOs originating from near Jupiter.

Canary Islands Sightings

An article by Finn W. Kalvik reports on a mass UFO sighting over the Canary Islands on March 5, 1979. Thousands witnessed a luminous, unidentified flying object described as a rocket-like craft emitting a beam of light. The object was seen from Tenerife, Gran Canaria, and Fuerteventura. Witnesses described it as an orange-colored cloud that formed into a distinct object. Some reports suggest the phenomenon might have been related to a rocket launch from a submarine.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently reports on UFO sightings and investigations, emphasizing the need for scientific inquiry and debunking sensationalist or pseudo-scientific claims. There is a clear editorial stance supporting the investigation of UFO phenomena as a serious matter, distinct from pseudoscience. The publication aims to inform the public about credible sightings and research, while also critiquing media coverage that may distort facts. The recurring theme is the persistent presence of unexplained aerial phenomena and the ongoing efforts to understand them, often highlighting the challenges posed by secrecy and misinformation.

This issue of UFO nr. 1-2/98, published by Norsk UFO Center, focuses on UFO phenomena, government secrecy, and scientific investigation. The cover features a drawing of a UFO over a landscape with the headline "UFOENE I HESSDALEN" (The UFOs in Hessdalen).

Cover Story: The UFOs in Hessdalen

The main article, "UFOENE I HESSDALEN" by Leif Havik, details the numerous UFO observations in the Hessdalen valley in Norway since December 1981. The objects are described as luminous, egg-shaped, cigar-shaped, and even projectile-like. The article notes that hundreds of credible witnesses have reported sightings, often facing ridicule. It discusses various theories, including atmospheric reflections and planetary phenomena, but dismisses them as insufficient. The observations have occurred in diverse weather conditions and times of day. The article also mentions similar sightings in Arendal and other Norwegian locations, as well as potential observations in Sweden. It highlights the presence of metallic deposits and strong magnetic fields in the Hessdalen area. A gallup poll conducted among attendees at a meeting in Ålen revealed that many had witnessed various types of UFOs, some experiencing minor effects like animal behavior changes or TV interference.

General MacArthur's Warning

An article titled "GENERAL MACARTHUR - Har vi råd til å overse hans advarsel?" (General MacArthur - Can we afford to ignore his warning?) discusses General Douglas MacArthur's interest in UFOs. He reportedly feared that UFOs were extraterrestrial craft preparing for an invasion and advocated for developing defensive capabilities. He also supported a program for space exploration. The article references a 1958 meeting where MacArthur shared these views, which were kept secret until his death in 1964. It also mentions his earlier statements in a 1955 interview about UFOs influencing civilization.

Government Cover-ups and CIA Involvement

Several articles touch upon alleged government cover-ups of UFO information. One piece highlights that the CIA, despite publicly denying involvement, was actively researching UFOs. A declassified document from August 1, 1952, advises the CIA to continue its 'cover-up' of the subject, emphasizing the need to prevent public panic. The FBI is also mentioned as burning its UFO archives due to fears of legal repercussions. The article criticizes the media, specifically NRK and Sveriges Radio, for not reporting on the Pentagon leak regarding UFOs.

Scientific Skepticism vs. Visionary Thinking

"VITENSKAP OG VISJON" (Science and Vision) by Ulf Gleditsch explores the conflict between mainstream science and visionary thinking, particularly in the context of UFO research. The author argues that science often dismisses unconventional ideas, leading to the isolation of those who hold them. He cites examples of scientists ridiculing UFO phenomena and mentions a Swedish TV program that allegedly portrayed UFOlogists as fanatics. The article draws parallels with Jules Verne, whose futuristic ideas were initially dismissed by contemporary science but later proved prophetic.

UFO Data Collection and Analysis

"UFO-OBSERVASJONER OG INNSAMLING AV DATA" (UFO Observations and Data Collection) by Hans-Kurt Karlsen outlines the necessary steps for analyzing UFO phenomena. It emphasizes the importance of recording object movement, color, light intensity, weather conditions, and any unusual occurrences. The article suggests that while many observations can be explained, a small percentage remain unexplained. It stresses the need for specialized equipment for accurate data collection and analysis, prioritizing the tracking of object trajectory and speed. The article also touches upon the difficulties in measuring radioactive radiation and suggests focusing on more consistent data like light and color.

Norsk UFO Center and Publications

The magazine also features information about Norsk UFO Center (NUFOC) and its publications. It announces the launch of "Nordic UFO Newsletter," a 24-page English-language journal produced in collaboration with UFO-Sverige. It also mentions that "Rapportnytt" will be changing to an A4 format in 1982, merging with "Internt UFO Forum" to become "UFO," a larger publication with approximately 48 pages. The organization "UFO-Norge" is also introduced as a merger of UFO-Norge and Norsk UFO Center.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue include the persistent mystery of UFO phenomena, the alleged efforts by governments and scientific institutions to suppress or dismiss information, and the importance of witness testimony and scientific investigation. The editorial stance appears to be one of advocating for open-mindedness towards UFOs, challenging the skepticism of the mainstream scientific community, and promoting the collection and analysis of UFO data. The magazine aims to inform its readers about ongoing UFO research and related controversies, encouraging critical thinking and a willingness to consider unconventional explanations.

This issue of UFO magazine, dated 1982 (cover date 1982, but internal references suggest 1983 and 1982), features a series of articles exploring the intersection of ufology and science. The main cover headline is 'UFO - I LUFTEN ELLER I HODET?' (UFO - In the air or in the head?), presented as 'Del 1' (Part 1).

Article 1: "Vitenskap og visjon" (Science and Vision) - A Response by Hans-Kurt Karlsen

Hans-Kurt Karlsen responds to an article by Ulf Gledisch, defending the role of science in understanding phenomena like UFOs. Karlsen argues against Gledisch's critique of science, stating that while science may not have all the answers, it is the best tool for expanding knowledge. He emphasizes the need for empirical evidence rather than mere speculation or 'visions' in ufology. Karlsen calls for UFO organizations to focus on gathering concrete proof to attract the interest of scientists, many of whom he describes as conservative and resistant to exploring less recognized scientific areas like ufology.

Article 2: UFO Detection and Analysis Methods

This section details potential methods for observing and analyzing UFOs. It suggests using triangulation from multiple observation points to pinpoint an object's location. The use of cameras, particularly synchronized cameras, is proposed to capture images and determine object trajectories. The article explains how multiple exposures on a single film can reveal an object's path, allowing for speed and trajectory calculations. It also touches upon the importance of recording environmental data such as wind speed and direction, though it questions the necessity of continuous automatic recording for these factors, suggesting manual recording of average values might suffice.

Furthermore, the article discusses the registration of light spectrum and intensity. It explains that prisms can split light into its constituent colors due to varying wavelengths, with violet light being refracted the most and red the least. Automatic measuring equipment is deemed necessary for this analysis due to the complexity of the data.

Article 3: UFO - In the Air or in the Head? (Part 1) by Hilary Evans

Hilary Evans explores the origin of UFOs and the nature of reality. He references early beliefs that UFOs might be advanced technology from other worlds or even from Earth's past. Evans then presents two case studies to question whether sightings are always physical phenomena.

Case Study 1 (Southwest England, November 1967): A truck driver reported seeing a large, egg-shaped object that hovered, made a humming sound, and smelled like an electric drill. The object moved away rapidly. The incident caused electrical failure in his vehicle and another nearby car. The site showed signs of scorching and melted asphalt.

Case Study 2 (Near Manchester, UK): Four individuals saw an unusual light that vanished. They then observed a gigantic shadow, described as the size of a football field or a kilometer, hovering low without sound. This case is presented to question if such events could be mass delusion.

Evans then delves into the nature of reality, distinguishing between dreams, hallucinations, and physical events. He questions how four unrelated individuals could perceive the same detailed event if it were purely psychological. He also discusses a case from Bristol where a woman claimed to command a hovering object with her voice, which her husband initially disbelieved but later confirmed.

Article 4: UFO and Science - Part 1 by Sivilingeniør Hans Kristian Moe

This article begins a series on UFOs and science, focusing on Einstein's theories of relativity. It explains Einstein's two postulates: the principle of relativity (no absolute frame of reference) and the constancy of the speed of light. The article uses a thought experiment involving a train and a light beam to illustrate time dilation and length contraction. It explains that as an object approaches the speed of light, time slows down for it, and its length contracts in the direction of motion. The mass of the object also increases, approaching infinity as it nears the speed of light, which implies an upper speed limit for massive objects.

The article calculates the time and energy required for interstellar travel at near-light speeds, highlighting the vast energy demands. It also touches upon the Mössbauer effect and atomic clocks as experimental confirmations of time dilation. The concept of spacetime, a four-dimensional framework combining space and time, is introduced. The article posits that gravity is a manifestation of the curvature of spacetime caused by mass and energy.

Article 5: UFO and Science - Part 2 by Sivilingeniør Hans Kristian Moe

Continuing the discussion on relativity, this part explores the implications of spacetime curvature. It explains that the universe can have positive curvature (like a sphere's surface) or negative curvature (like a saddle). The article discusses how the distribution of galaxies can indicate the universe's curvature. A positively curved, closed universe would eventually contract, leading to a 'big crunch,' while a negatively curved, open universe would expand indefinitely.

The article then revisits the concept of reality, comparing dreams, hallucinations, and visions. It mentions the phenomenon of visions being seen by multiple people simultaneously, citing the example of Jeanne d'Arc and a reported vision in Cairo. The concept of holograms is introduced as a scientifically recognized phenomenon that challenges our understanding of reality. The article concludes by stating that while we perceive physical objects as real, they are largely composed of empty space, theoretically allowing passage through solid matter. It sets up a future discussion on psychological phenomena and UFOs.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently attempts to bridge the gap between ufology and scientific inquiry. It advocates for rigorous scientific methodology, empirical evidence, and theoretical frameworks like Einstein's relativity to understand UFO phenomena. There's a clear stance against purely speculative or 'visionary' approaches, emphasizing the need for verifiable data. The editorial stance appears to be one of open-minded scientific investigation, encouraging the application of scientific principles to unexplained aerial phenomena while acknowledging the limitations of current scientific understanding and the potential for psychological factors to influence perception. The articles suggest that while UFOs might be physical objects, the nature of reality, perception, and spacetime itself are complex and may hold keys to understanding these phenomena.

Title: UFO - I LUFTEN ELLER I HODET? (UFO - In the air or in the head?)
Issue: 1-2/98
Date: 1983
Publisher: UFO-NORGE
Country: Norway
Language: Norwegian

This issue of UFO magazine delves into the complex and often controversial subject of UFO phenomena, exploring whether these sightings are genuine physical events or psychological manifestations. The articles present a range of perspectives, from personal accounts and historical cases to scientific investigations and parapsychological theories.

Part 1: UFO - In the Air or in the Head?

This section, authored by Hilary Evans, begins by revisiting the concept of 'reality' from a previous issue, suggesting that understanding reality is key to understanding UFOs. It presents two historical cases to illustrate potential psychological or parapsychological aspects of UFO experiences.

Case 1: The Vanishing Housemaid (London, 1882)

A woman visiting a house in London reported seeing a housemaid on the stairs, who then inexplicably vanished. The family denied having such a maid, leaving the incident unexplained and hinting at a possible psychic element or a shared delusion.

Case 2: The Chinese Man in the Alps

A German woman on a mountain hike found herself in a dangerous situation as dusk fell. She encountered a large, luminous sphere that transformed into a tall figure resembling a Chinese man. This figure guided her to safety along a narrow path before disappearing. The author notes the woman felt no fear, finding the encounter natural. She speculates that the figure appeared because the woman needed help, questioning its origin – perhaps from the woman's own mind or a shared psychic wavelength.

Comparison and Further Cases

Evans compares these cases, suggesting the housemaid might have appeared due to a psychic connection, while the 'Chinese man' likely appeared specifically to help the stranded hiker. The article then introduces two famous UFO cases:

#### Monsieur Masse's Encounter (Valensole, France, 1965)

Monsieur Masse, a lavender producer, reported seeing a UFO land in his field. He observed human-like beings outside the craft. He claims the beings controlled him, leaving him paralyzed while they re-entered their vehicle and departed. Masse was not initially interested in UFOs, making his account seem more credible. The incident left marks on the ground, and investigators found no reason to suspect Masse of lying.

#### George Adamski's Encounters

Adamski's accounts of meeting 'Ufonauts' are presented, noting his claims of friendly encounters and journeys to Venus. However, the article points out inconsistencies, such as Adamski's descriptions of cities on the Moon and small furry animals, which contradict later space exploration findings. The credibility of Adamski's witnesses is also questioned due to their unusual beliefs.

The Question of Reality vs. Mind

Evans poses the central question: are these UFO events real, or do they occur in the mind? He acknowledges that the issue is complex and not easily categorized. He then introduces the concept of 'Vardøger', a Norwegian phenomenon of premonition, drawing a parallel to how people might perceive UFOs. He suggests that the timing of UFO sightings coinciding with humanity's exploration of space is unlikely to be a coincidence, implying a connection.

Part 2: UFOs and Science (Commentary by Hans Kr. Moe)

Hans Kr. Moe provides commentary on a previous article ('UFO and Science, Part 1'), aiming to simplify the complex scientific concepts. He explains that as an object's mass approaches the speed of light, its mass increases infinitely, and time slows down, eventually reaching zero at infinite mass. He highlights two major challenges for interstellar travel: communication across vast distances (due to the speed of light limit) and the immense energy required to accelerate mass to near light speed.

Communication and Propulsion Challenges

Moe explains that electromagnetic waves travel at the speed of light. Therefore, a message and its reply over a distance of a thousand light-years would take two thousand years to complete, requiring extreme stability on the home planet. He also details the mass increase of a 250-ton spaceship approaching light speed, requiring the 'burning' of vast amounts of mass to achieve such speeds, leading to the concept of black holes.

Part 3: Ufology - The Neglected Science?

Authored by Jenny Randles and Peter Warrington, this section argues that while ufology has attracted 'cranks' rather than scientists, there are aspects of UFO phenomena worth serious scientific investigation.

Scientific Approach to UFOs

The authors discuss Shirley McIver's sociological study of UFO believers and the trend for UFO researchers to move from superficial reports to detailed analysis of specific events. They suggest that UFO phenomena are not a single entity but a collection of independent phenomena, likely with natural terrestrial explanations rather than extraterrestrial origins.

Unidentified Atmospheric Phenomena (UAP)

They propose the term 'Unidentified Atmospheric Phenomena' (UAP) for identifiable UFO categories. These are described as egg-shaped objects, 1-3 meters in diameter, rotating on a vertical axis, and emitting electromagnetic radiation. The article notes that the nature and conditions of UAP observation can be predicted, and scientists with the right instruments can verify their existence and study their nature.

#### Research by Harley Rutledge and Michael Persinger

The article mentions Harley Rutledge's study of 178 UAP observations and Michael Persinger's theory that UAPs might result from the piezoelectric effect in certain rock formations, generating electric fields that ionize air. This theory suggests UAPs should be concentrated near active fault lines and in hilly terrain.

Jenny Randles' Research

Jenny Randles' research supports Persinger's hypothesis, finding a correlation between the number of UFO observations and the thickness of quartz-bearing layers, as well as a link to water reservoirs. She also notes that 'mysterious helicopters' observed in the Pennine hills are typical UAPs.

Alternative Explanations: Hallucinations and Hypnosis

Randles and Warrington also explore the controversial category of alleged UFO abductions. They note that these reports typically have fewer witnesses than typical UFO sightings. Persinger suggests these experiences might be hallucinations induced by ionizing radiation. Alvin Lawson and William McCall propose that abduction accounts could be explained by repressed memories of birth, particularly relating to the method of birth (natural vs. Cesarean section).

The Value of Ufology

The authors conclude that while not aiming to prove a specific cause for UFOs, ufology offers valuable data across various fields, including birth psychology, hallucinations, and atmospheric physics. They advocate for more respect towards serious UFO researchers.

Part 4: More on the UFO Landing in England!

This section, by Knut Aasheim, revisits a reported UFO landing incident in England, first covered by the magazine 'Flying Saucer Review' (FSR).

FSR's Initial Report (March 1981)

FSR reported rumors of a significant event involving military personnel, suggesting three independent sources corroborated an extraordinary incident or series of events.

Civil Radar Operator's Details (June 1982)

FSR published an article detailing how a civil radar operator tracked a UFO towards Suffolk. US Air Force personnel reportedly appeared two days later, confiscated the recording, and hinted at an unusual landing near Woodbridge base, involving a metallic craft, beings, and electromagnetic effects on a military jeep.

Local UFO Investigator's Findings

Brenda Butler, a local UFO investigator, learned about the incident from a military friend. Her findings, corroborated by 'Art Wallace' from USAF, included:

• The object appeared damaged.
• Three beings, about 1 meter tall in silver suits, were seen repairing the craft.
• The base commander confiscated cameras and imposed a news blackout, reportedly speaking with the aliens himself.
• The craft was on the ground for four hours before departing.
• A subsequent search found evidence of radiation.

Further Investigations and Skepticism

Brenda and her colleague 'Dot' Street investigated the area, finding that a civilian electrician was called to the base to repair runway lights under heavy guard, which he found unusual. They also experienced a car malfunction in Tangham forest, where their vehicle accelerated uncontrollably. While the authors consider these events significant, Jenny Randles expresses skepticism.

Part 5: UFO Over Nordmøre

This article by Knut Aasheim discusses a widely publicized UFO photograph taken by Pål Kristian Vaag in August 1983.

The VG Newspaper Coverage

The photograph was featured on the front page of the Norwegian newspaper VG, described as a daylight photo of a solid metallic object. The Air Force was reportedly surprised, with Lieutenant Colonel Einar Smedsvig stating that if it was a forgery, it was extremely skillful.

Pål Kristian Vaag's Account

Vaag described seeing a strange object descend vertically towards his home. It stopped about 200 meters away. He managed to take a photograph before the object rapidly accelerated and disappeared. The total observation time was about two minutes, and the object was silent. Vaag estimated the object's diameter at 10 meters.

Expert Reactions

Experts from the Air Force's photo division at Rygge were unable to definitively prove the photo was a forgery, noting its clarity and proportions. Captain Kåre Kvamme stated that while he couldn't prove it was fake, he also couldn't prove it was real, suggesting it might be a 'summer joke'. He mentioned that unidentified aircraft have been detected on radar systems, but their nature remains unexplained.

Technical Analysis

VG sent the photo to the Norwegian Institute of Technology (NTH) for analysis. Researcher Jarle Hjelen used electron microscopy and scanning techniques but could not provide a definitive conclusion, stating he could not reveal anything. He expressed personal skepticism towards supernatural phenomena.

Camera and Vaag's Reaction

Vaag used a simple Kodak Disc 4000 camera, which has limited settings, making trick photography unlikely. He was deeply affected by the experience and initially hesitant to share it, fearing disbelief. The article notes that only a fraction of UFO experiences are reported, encouraging more people to come forward.

Media Reactions

Most newspapers did not cover the event extensively. Sunnmøre Arbeideravis published two articles, one suggesting it was a 'UFO-forgery!' and another calling it a 'good joke', quoting a local photographer who claimed 99% of UFO photos are fake. The newspaper 'Nationen' also published an article quoting Captain Kvamme's skepticism.

Commentary

Knut Aasheim comments on the media's tendency to dismiss the photo, noting that the skepticism often relies on the opinions of figures like Captain Kvamme rather than concrete evidence. He points out inconsistencies in Kvamme's statements across different interviews.

Further Investigations

Journalist Arne Børcke of NTB, who contacted Vaag, described him as sober and skeptical, but convinced of the photo's authenticity. The article mentions that UFO-Rapport, a group of amateur researchers, is involved in documenting such cases.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently explores the UFO phenomenon from multiple angles, including eyewitness accounts, alleged landings, and scientific analysis. There is a clear editorial stance that encourages serious investigation into UFOs, even while acknowledging the prevalence of hoaxes and the challenges of scientific verification. The articles often highlight the psychological and parapsychological aspects of UFO experiences, suggesting that the mind may play a significant role in how these phenomena are perceived and interpreted. The magazine also aims to bridge the gap between anecdotal reports and scientific inquiry, promoting the idea that ufology, despite its controversial reputation, can contribute valuable data to various scientific fields. The recurring theme is the ongoing debate between the physical reality of UFOs and their potential origin within the human psyche.

This issue of UFO magazine, dated 1998 and identified as issue 1-2/98, published by UFO-Norge, focuses on several significant UFO-related events and discussions. The cover prominently features the "AVSLØRING!" (Revelation!) of Pål Kristian Vaag, with a smaller image of a UFO and a quote from a TV show.

Pål Kristian Vaag Photo Revealed as Hoax

The lead article details the debunking of the Pål Kristian Vaag UFO photograph. Initially published and generating significant media attention, the photo was later revealed to be a hoax. Pål Kristian Vaag himself admitted to staging the photograph, which depicted a 'analysis by the American organization G.S.W. (Ground Saucer Watch) using advanced electronic equipment indicated was a bookend suspended by a thread. The article notes that Vaag waited over half a year before revealing the incident and later expressed regret. The author discusses the financial aspects, including Vaag selling the rights to a friend for 500 Norwegian Kroner, who then sold them to VG (Verdens Gang). The article also touches upon the media's tendency to sensationalize and ridicule UFO reports, noting a pattern of "Sensasjon; Latterliggjørelse; and Glemsel" (Sensation; Ridicule; and Oblivion), and observes that many newspapers employing this tactic had ties to the Labour Party.

Dr. J. Allen Hynek's Visit to Norway

Another major section covers the visit of Dr. J. Allen Hynek, a prominent UFO researcher, to Norway in January 1985. The author, Odd-Gunnar Røed, recounts meeting Hynek at Fornebu airport and accompanying him on a journey towards Hessdalen. Despite initial plans to go directly to Hessdalen, a detour was made due to Hynek's desire to see the Norwegian nature. The journey involved overcoming cold weather and a car issue near Røros, where they received hospitality. Hynek, described as being 74 years old but still spry, participated in discussions and observations at the Hessdalen site. The article highlights the international nature of Project Hessdalen and Hynek's interest in its research, noting that he believed Norwegians and Swedes were doing impressive work that Americans might not be able to replicate. Hynek's visit also included time in Oslo, where he met with various UFO researchers and was shown film footage from Hessdalen by NRK.

UFO-Norge on "Senfredag"

This section recounts the experience of Leif Havik and Erling Strand from UFO-Norge participating in the TV show "Senfredag" on April 3, 1987. They describe the preparation, including makeup and discussions with the host, Dan Børge. The show involved the guests presenting their stories before engaging in a discussion. The authors emphasize the need for an active and engaging presentation style to keep the audience interested. They recall the atmosphere of the show and the subsequent interviews with other media outlets like NÅ and Aftenposten.

The Origin of "Flying Saucers"

Clas Svahn's article traces the origin of the term "flying saucers." It explains that the term was popularized by Kenneth Arnold's sighting on June 24, 1947, near Mount Rainer, Washington. Arnold described the objects' movement as similar to a saucer skipping across water. The article clarifies that the term referred to the movement, not the shape, and that UFO (Unidentified Flying Object) later became the more common term. It also notes that similar sightings and descriptions of unidentified aerial phenomena existed long before Arnold's encounter, dating back to the late 1800s in Texas.

UFO Phenomena and Research

The magazine includes discussions on various aspects of UFO research. It touches upon Leonard Stringfield's hypotheses about 'frozen UFO-nauts' and the lack of concrete evidence. The article mentions the Philadelphia Experiment and Albert Einstein's alleged involvement, which Hynek dismissed as rumor. It also addresses the Bermuda Triangle, with the author suggesting that skepticism is healthy when evaluating claims, especially those promoted by authors like Charles Berlitz. The issue highlights the challenges in UFO research, including the difficulty in obtaining concrete evidence and the tendency for the phenomenon to be met with ridicule.

Project Hessdalen and its Significance

Project Hessdalen is presented as a significant international research effort to explain unexplained light phenomena. The article emphasizes the project's idealistic nature, with participants working without financial compensation. The need for clear, 24-hour camera surveillance is highlighted. The project's continuation is deemed important for keeping the UFO phenomenon in the public consciousness, especially given its unique stationary nature in Hessdalen.

Other Mentions

The issue also includes a brief mention of a report from the Swedish newspaper Norrbotten-Kuriren regarding UFO sightings in Sweden in 1946, with a significant number described as cigar-shaped objects. An advertisement for Leif Havik's book "UFO-fenomenet" is also present.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently explores UFO sightings, investigations, and the challenges of scientific research in this field. There is a clear stance against sensationalism and a preference for evidence-based analysis, while acknowledging the persistent nature of the UFO phenomenon. The editorial tone often reflects a critical yet open-minded approach to the subject matter, encouraging skepticism but also the pursuit of understanding. The magazine appears to advocate for serious research and documentation, as seen in its coverage of Project Hessdalen and its support for organizations like UFO-Norge.

This issue of UFO-NORGE, dated 1989 (though some articles reference later dates like 1991 and 1992), is a special publication focusing on Nikola Tesla and various UFO phenomena, primarily in Norway. The magazine delves into Tesla's life, inventions, and visionary ideas, alongside detailed accounts of UFO sightings and investigations.

Nikola Tesla: Visionary and Enigma

The first section, authored by Per Ottesen, introduces Nikola Tesla as an electrical engineer, inventor, and visionary. It highlights his significant contributions, including the asynchronous and synchronous motors, radio telegraphy, high-frequency alternating current (used in electrotherapy), and three-phase power transmission. Ottesen describes Tesla as an "adventure figure" whose inventions impact daily life. He emphasizes Tesla's forward-thinking visions, such as the transmission of images, documents, and radio/TV programs wirelessly, which he foresaw in 1900. The article quotes Tesla expressing strong views against using fossil fuels for electricity generation, advocating for water power as the only sensible way to utilize "solar energy" (referring to the water cycle). Tesla's experiments with wireless power transmission are also mentioned, noting that while he succeeded, the technology has not been replicated since. Ottesen suggests a deliberate suppression of Tesla's work and significance, noting that this Norwegian booklet was recognized by the Yugoslavian embassy as an official biography.

UFO Over Trengereid: A Wave of Sightings

Authored by Mentz Kaarbø, this extensive report details a series of UFO observations over Trengereid, near Bergen, Norway, between January 16 and February 10, 1991. Over 20-30 reports were filed, many describing similar objects. While acknowledging that most sightings might be aircraft, the report focuses on a handful that remain unexplained. The phenomenon was observed low over the fjord, near mountain formations. The initial report by Inge Skulstad described a round object with blinking white lights and two red lights, which hovered for several minutes before disappearing. Subsequent reports confirmed similar sightings. The case gained media attention, with newspapers and NRK covering the events. Investigations by local authorities and Flesland Airport found no record of unusual air traffic. The article includes witness accounts, descriptions of the object's appearance (round or oval, with blinking lights), and its maneuvers. It also discusses potential explanations, such as aircraft (specifically SAS flight SK 339 from Oslo) and atmospheric phenomena like light refractions, but concludes that some sightings remain unexplained.

Spitsbergen Incident: The 1952 'Flying Saucer'

Ole Jonny Brænne recounts the history of the Spitsbergen 'flying saucer' incident, which allegedly occurred in 1952. The story, originating from a German newspaper, describes a silver, disc-shaped object with a plexiglass dome, about 40-50 meters in diameter, landing on Spitsbergen. It was reportedly discovered by Norwegian jet fighters during maneuvers, causing radio and radar interference. The object was described as being made of an unknown metal alloy and equipped with 46 automatic nozzles. The article notes that the object was transported to Narvik and then to the USA for examination. It also mentions that the object's propulsion system emitted a signal on 934 Hertz, unknown to Earth. The report speculates on a Soviet origin and a possible V-weapon connection, citing a German V-weapon constructor. The article traces the evolution of this story through over 160 articles in books and periodicals over 40 years, ultimately arguing against its factual basis.

Traces in the Snow: The Øydeskyvatn Case

Torfrid Urdal reports on observations at Øydeskyvatn, near Haukeli, Norway, during Easter 1991. Seven witnesses observed a luminous phenomenon over several days. On March 24, a bright object was seen hovering and possibly landing, emitting a reddish light. The following days saw similar sightings. On March 26, after a witness flashed a light at the object, it extinguished its lights and descended. The next day, three distinct spiral imprints, approximately 50-60 cm in diameter, were found in the snow, forming a triangle. Analysis of snow samples from the imprints revealed near-sterility, which was considered unusual. The article discusses the investigation, including field tests and sample analysis, and notes the similarity of the landscape to Hessdalen. It also mentions that the case gained international attention, with photos of the tracks sent to researchers in England, China, Hungary, and the USA.

Close Encounters and Belief Systems

Torfrid Urdal also contributes an article titled "NÆRKONTAKT MED TRO" (Close Contact with Belief), exploring how UFO phenomena can be interpreted through the lens of belief systems, similar to religious experiences. The article categorizes 'Star People' theories into three parts: the 'von Däniken syndrome' (seeking ancient alien visits), accounts of personal encounters with extraterrestrials, and the 'abduction' phenomenon. It mentions figures like George Adamski, Orthon, Truman Bethurum, Aura Rhanes, George van Tassel, Ruth Norman (Uriel), and Howard Menger, who claim contact with beings from space and convey messages of peace and environmentalism. The author draws parallels between these accounts and religious experiences, such as Moses meeting God, Paul's vision, and Joseph Smith receiving the Book of Mormon. The article highlights the Betty and Barney Hill abduction case as a pivotal event in the history of abduction reports. It concludes by advocating for increased research into these claims, emphasizing that the witnesses are diverse, geographically separated, and not mentally disturbed, suggesting that their consistent stories warrant serious investigation rather than outright dismissal.

Hamar Close Encounter: A Triangular Object

Another report details a close encounter near Hamar, Norway, on March 9, 1992. Two women reported hearing a low-frequency, vibrating sound. They then observed a triangular object hovering a few meters above the ground, emitting a bright white light. The object had a dome made of transparent material. They described seeing two occupants inside, moving in a "jerky" manner. One woman had a direct, unsettling eye contact with one of the occupants, describing large, black, slanted eyes with visible pupils, and a cold, penetrating gaze. The object then disappeared abruptly. Later that evening, the same sound was heard near one of the women's homes, accompanied by a sensation of an earthquake. Both women experienced earaches and nosebleeds, and one suffered visual disturbances for a week and felt drained of energy for a month. The article notes that the woman involved later claimed further encounters and became a public figure, discussing pregnancy with aliens and giving lectures.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the intersection of UFO phenomena with science, belief systems, and media coverage. The magazine presents detailed investigative reports on specific UFO cases in Norway, often highlighting witness testimonies and the challenges of explaining these events through conventional means. There's a clear editorial stance that while some sightings may have mundane explanations, a significant portion remains unexplained and warrants further investigation. The inclusion of Nikola Tesla's story suggests a connection between visionary science and the possibility of advanced, non-human technology. The magazine aims to document and analyze these phenomena, encouraging readers to share their own experiences and contributing to the ongoing discourse on UFOs.

This issue of UFO Magazine, dated 1-2/98, is a comprehensive collection of articles focusing on UFO phenomena, primarily within Norway, but also touching upon international cases and research. It includes a historical overview, detailed case studies, discussions on media portrayals, and updates on ongoing research projects.

UFO-Spesialhefte 1993: Norske UFO-Observasjoner 1536-1946 by Ole Jonny Brænne

This article presents a historical survey of UFO sightings in Norway from 1536 to 1946. The author notes the limited research in this area and the challenges of verifying older reports, often relying on folklore and popular beliefs. Brænne draws parallels between historical accounts of 'bergfolk' (mountain folk), 'haugfolk' (mound folk), 'huldrefolk' (hidden people), and 'underjordiske' (underground dwellers) with modern UFO reports, suggesting a continuity of anomalous aerial phenomena. He highlights how these older beings were described as living in different dimensions, having different perceptions of time, and sometimes abducting humans, mirroring modern 'abduction' narratives and CE-4 reports. The article emphasizes that UFO phenomena are not new, citing historical names like 'airship,' 'ghost plane,' and 'ghost rocket' for such sightings.

UFO - Temahefte 1994: Norske Nærkontakter av 3. Grad by Odd-Gunnar Røed

This section focuses on 'close encounters' with UFOs in Norway, specifically defining and detailing cases of 'Close Encounters of the 3rd Kind' (CE-III) and 'Close Encounters of the 4th Kind' (CE-IV). The author uses Dr. J. Allen Hynek's classification system. The article presents several cases from Norway, including an incident from Hessdalen in 1870, Reinsnos near Odda in 1992, Sulitjelma in 1915, Mosjøen in 1954, Hallingdal in 1957, Lånke in 1981, Mandal in 1984, Hønefoss in 1985, Granollers (Spain) in 1991, and Hamar in 1992. It also touches upon a historical account from Assens, Norway (or possibly Denmark), dating back to 1869, involving an angelic encounter.

"Lønning og Staff" på TV2 by Mentz Kaarbø

This is a review of a TV2 program from November 3, 1994, titled "Lønning og Staff," which featured a debate on UFO phenomena. The program included UFO proponents like Gry Jannicke Jarlum and Eivind Martinsen, and skeptics like Erik Tandberg and Rolf Brahde. The debate covered Jannicke's experiences and other related topics. The article notes that the discussion was heated and lacked clear resolutions, with participants often talking past each other. It also mentions Knut Aasheim's claim about famous Norwegians being of extraterrestrial origin and Erling Strand's discussion of the Project Hessdalen. Psychiatrist Einar Kringlen was also present, expressing skepticism towards Jannicke's claims. Clas Svahn of UFO-Sverige suggested that interpretations of UFO phenomena are influenced by contemporary culture. Colonel Tore Løkvik stated that UFOs had not been detected on radar in Norwegian airspace.

Autentisk Roswellfilm fra 1947? by Philip Mantle

This article investigates the controversial Roswell film, allegedly showing events related to the 1947 UFO crash. The author, Director of Investigations for BUFORA, recounts his interactions with Ray Santilli, the owner of the film. Santilli claims to have acquired the film from a cameraman who was initially hired to film Elvis Presley. The article details Mantle's attempts to view the film, including a trip to London. He eventually saw a seven-minute sequence described as a "on-site examination," showing a humanoid figure on a table, partially covered by a sheet, with two men in white coats appearing to take tissue samples. Later, Mantle witnessed a higher-quality film of an alleged autopsy, depicting a humanoid alien with specific physical characteristics. The article also discusses the media frenzy surrounding the film and addresses rumors and accusations of deception.

Verdenssensasjon i Hessdalen: Montering av automatisk målestasjon for UFO-fenomen by Arnulf Løken

This report details the installation of an automated monitoring station (AMS) in Hessdalen, Norway, to study the UFO phenomenon. The project, led by Erling P. Strand, involves a video camera, computers, and a modem for data transmission via the internet. The station was set up in August 1998. The article describes the technical setup, the challenges faced during installation (including a computer malfunction), and the involvement of local authorities and educational institutions. It highlights the historical context of Hessdalen as a site of numerous UFO observations since the early 1980s, noting that previous research indicated electromagnetic radiation and magnetic anomalies, but not seismic activity. The article also mentions the media attention the project received, including reports from Verdens Gang, Adresseavisen, and NRK, and notes that the first UFO phenomenon was registered by the station on August 14, 1998.

Forskerpanel med Rapport som Anbefaler Videre Utforskning av UFO-Fenomenet

This section discusses a significant report by a research group led by Peter Sturrock at Stanford University, which concluded that the UFO phenomenon warrants further scientific investigation. The panel, composed of scientists from various fields, evaluated "best case" UFO reports. While not definitively concluding extraterrestrial intelligence, the report acknowledged the existence of unexplained phenomena with physical traces. It emphasized the need for objective evaluation and consideration of all hypotheses. The article also mentions that Project Hessdalen was referenced in the report, and the planned automated monitoring station was noted.

Støtt Project Hessdalen og Driften av den Automatiske Målestasjonen!

This is an appeal for financial support for Project Hessdalen and the ongoing operation of the automated monitoring station. It explains that while the initial setup costs are covered, operational expenses are mounting, and the project's funds are running low. Readers are encouraged to contribute to ensure the continued functioning of this important research project.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently promotes the serious investigation of UFO phenomena, presenting both historical and contemporary cases. There's a clear emphasis on documenting sightings, analyzing evidence, and exploring potential explanations, often drawing connections between folklore and modern UFO reports. The editorial stance appears to be one of open-minded inquiry, encouraging scientific scrutiny while acknowledging the unexplained nature of many events. The magazine also highlights the importance of ongoing research projects like Hessdalen and the analysis of controversial evidence such as the Roswell film. The publication aims to inform its readers about the latest developments in UFO research and related topics.