UFO - 1996 No 1

Magazine Overview

This issue of UFO magazine, identified as NR. 1-1996 and part of the 15. ÅRGANG, is published by UFO-NORGE, described as Norway's only special magazine on UFO phenomena. The cover prominently features a photograph of a landscape with a flying object in the sky, and headlines highlight a "captured object" near Bergen, a discussion about the Roswell film, and Norwegian observations. The price for a single issue is KR. 45,-.

Editorial Content

From the Editor (FRA REDAKSJONEN)

The editorial section notes that this issue contains a few, but thorough, articles, leading to the postponement of regular columns on astronomy and astrology. The next issue is expected at the end of June/July. The 'Rapportnytt' section presents recent reports to the Rapportsentralen, including an explanation of a previously published photo case and instructions on creating a 'fake' UFO photo. A significant article discusses a possible close encounter experience where three women in Eastern Norway reported a time loss of about an hour and observed a strange, rocket-like phenomenon. The magazine also mentions the involvement of Dr. Jan Marius Junge, a physician, in cases of alleged close encounters, utilizing hypnotic regression to uncover repressed memories.

Open Letter to Ray Santilli

This section addresses Ray Santilli regarding the alleged Roswell footage. The UFO-Society is divided on the film's authenticity, and the letter urges Santilli to provide the original footage for dating by Kodak, stating that "UFO-NORWAY feels, this is the only decent thing to do in this matter." Odd-Gunnar Røed signs off on this letter.

Articles and Reports

'Rapportnytt' (Report News) by Odd-Gunnar Røed discusses the volume of reports received (300-500 annually) and the challenge of distinguishing UFO phenomena from astronomical objects like Venus. It explains how atmospheric conditions and subjective perception can distort observations. The section also includes a summary of observations from December 1, 1995, to March 15, 1996, featuring a detailed case of an E-18 incident near Songe, Aust-Agder, from May 16, 1978, where a car's electrical system failed while a metallic silver-grey object was observed.

'PROJECT HESSDALEN' by Erling P. Strand recounts his trip to Australia to investigate ground light phenomena. He presents observations and instrument readings from his journey.

'UFO-NORGE Rapportsentralen Situasjonsrapport' (December 1, 1995 - March 15, 1996) lists numerous UFO sightings across Norway, with many entries suggesting Venus as a possible explanation, but others describing phenomena that are harder to attribute to known celestial bodies.

Case Studies:

• Vassdalsvik, Meløy i Nordland (CE-I): On February 6, 1985, an intense light and a disc-shaped object were observed.
• Ankenesfjellet ved Narvik i Nordland: On October 20, 1987, multiple lights were seen moving in the sky, illuminating the terrain.
• Skedsmo Kirke, Skedsmokorset i Akershus (CE-I): In early 1994, a loud, metallic sound was heard, and a formation of large, orange-red lights was observed.
• Evje i Aust-Agder: On July 13, 1995, two cars observed a cigar-shaped object moving parallel to the road.
• Mellom Los Angeles og Phoenix i Arizona, USA (CE-I): On July 25, 1995, a student and his friend witnessed multiple lights pursued by fighter jets, with one object described as cigar-shaped.
• Skien i Telemark (CE-I): On October 21, 1995, a disc-shaped object with intense light was observed.
• Fidjeland ved Tjørhom i Vest-Agder (CE-II): On October 29, 1995, a bright, multi-colored object was seen.

Personal Accounts:

• 'Paralysert': An account of feeling paralyzed during an observation.
• 'Likblek': A description of feeling unwell after witnessing a UFO.
• 'Norsk student med merkelig opplevelse i USA': A student's account of observing multiple UFOs and fighter jets in Arizona, during which his electronic watch reset.
• 'Vikedal ved Ålvik i Hordaland (CE-I)': A brief account of a sighting.
• 'Aldri interessert seg for UFO': A report about Jørgen Dahl, who had never been interested in UFOs but experienced an event.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently focuses on UFO sightings and alleged encounters, presenting them as phenomena worthy of study. There's a clear effort to differentiate between misidentified natural phenomena (like Venus) and genuine unexplained events. The editorial stance appears to be one of open investigation, encouraging readers to report their experiences and contributing to the understanding of UFO phenomena. The publication also highlights the organizational structure of UFO-NORGE, including its various regional groups and contact information, emphasizing its role as a central hub for UFO research in Norway. The issue also touches upon the technical aspects of UFO photography and the use of hypnosis in retrieving witness memories.

This issue of UFO magazine, dated 1/96, focuses on recent UFO and UAP (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena) sightings and related research, primarily from Norway. It includes witness testimonies, photographic analysis, and discussions on the interpretation of these events.

Key Articles and Reports

UFO Landing Near Dam?

Synnøve Fidjeland (53) reports an incident near a dam called Degdammen. She observed a strong light, initially mistaking it for a construction machine, which then ascended with blinking lights. The object moved eastward at a steady pace, with alternating green and orange lights. Using binoculars, she saw two yellow-white lights on the sides, forming a square shape. The object then disappeared over Hillknuten. She notes the object resembled a plane but was brighter and faster, and the event was silent.

Klæbu, Sør-Trøndelag Sighting

On November 27, 1995, at 22:30, Solveig Trolie (27) and her partner observed a large yellow-white sphere over Vassfjellet near Klæbu. The sighting lasted 4-5 minutes. The object was initially silent, then produced a powerful sound. Its color shifted between white, red, and green, and its speed was uneven. Solveig took photos of the object as it moved southwest, then northwest towards Bratsberg, where it appeared to land after blinking red.

Strange Light Phenomenon Was Venus

This article discusses a report on Norwegian television (NRK's Kveldnytt) about a strange light phenomenon observed over Oslo on February 13th. The report, featuring a video recording, initially presented it as an unidentified object. However, the author, along with Odd-Gunnar Røed of Rapportsentralen, investigated and concluded it was likely the planet Venus. The report was also covered by TV 2 and other media outlets, with some initially misinterpreting it as a UFO.

UFO Photographed Over Holteskaret, Hemsedal, 1953

Esther Wilberg submitted a photograph taken in the Easter of 1953 of a luminous red sphere moving at a leisurely pace over Holteskaret in Hemsedal. The object had a distinct 'tail' and was described as being the size of the sun. Despite examination by photographers and experts, no immediate technical explanation was found. The article speculates it could be a meteor but notes the lack of sound associated with such an event.

Gjettum, Sandvika, Akershus Sighting (February 13, 1996)

Ola Hanche-Olsen (76) from Gjettum reported observing a large, cylindrical object approximately 500 meters above him. The object was white or light silver with a black band in the middle, moving silently and steadily. He compared its speed to a slow propeller plane. The object disappeared behind Kolsås. Hanche-Olsen suggests it might have been a towed banner, but notes the absence of a towing plane and engine noise.

Hemsedal, Buskerud Sighting (February 20, 1996)

A 50-year-old observer reported seeing three large, pulsating lights near Lykkja in Hemsedal. Two lights merged into a red light that moved upwards and disappeared, then reappeared. The other two lights moved towards Hunsemvann. Later, as the observer drove home, a large object with two pulsating lights glided behind and over the car. The object was described as silent, between 12 and 15 meters in diameter, and illuminated from within and without.

UFO Photo Clarified!

An article discusses a UFO photograph published in a previous issue (UFO nr. 3/4) showing two mysterious 'horns' sticking out of cloud cover. This image was taken from a Braathens flight near Stavanger. The 'horns' were identified as the tall towers of the Kårstø gas power plant. The article explains that the tips of these towers, which are 220 meters high, can be visible above low clouds, leading to misidentification.

Close Contact Near Råde, Østfold

On August 26, 1995, three women (Eva, Kari, and Berit) experienced a time loss of about an hour while driving between Fredrikstad and Moss. They observed a rocket-like object at close range. During the encounter, their car's lights and engine malfunctioned, and streetlights in the area were also out. The object was described as a flying star, moving at high speed. The observer (Eva) noted the object stopped and hovered before accelerating away. The object's estimated length was between 10 and 15 meters. A parallel event involved Eva's husband smelling a sulfurous odor and experiencing unusual computer messages.

About UFO Phenomenon and Hypnosis

This section, authored by Jan Marius Junge, discusses the use of hypnosis in investigating UFO encounters, particularly 'close contact of the 4th kind'. It highlights the potential of hypnosis to access subconscious memories but warns against its misuse, citing the 'regression therapy' phenomenon in the USA where alleged incest memories can cause psychological distress. The author emphasizes that information obtained through hypnosis should not be taken as absolute fact, as the subconscious can be influenced by external information, such as literature about humanoids. The article mentions a case involving Finn C., who underwent hypnosis to understand an experience at Ringkollen, and notes that he now feels more functional. The author is also working with four other individuals who have allegedly experienced close encounters.

Letters to the Editor (LSERBREV)

• Mantell and Roswell Cases: A reader questions the lack of discussion on the Mantell case and argues against the spaceship theory for the Roswell incident, finding it illogical for an advanced craft to crash. The response suggests the Mantell case is likely explained as a Skyhook balloon and expresses reservations about the authenticity of the Roswell autopsy film, pending analysis by Kodak.
• Delays: A reader points out the contradiction between UFO-NORGE apologizing for publication delays and urging prompt subscription payments. The response explains that UFOlogy is a hobby for those involved, and delays are due to limited free time, not reader tardiness. It suggests that if subscribers could contribute financially, it would allow for more dedicated work.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently presents UFO sightings and related phenomena with a degree of seriousness, encouraging investigation and analysis. However, there is also a critical perspective, particularly in the book review and the discussion on hypnosis, which cautions against uncritical acceptance of claims and highlights the potential for psychological explanations or misinterpretations. The editorial stance appears to be one of open inquiry tempered with a need for critical evaluation and scientific scrutiny, while also acknowledging the limitations of resources and the voluntary nature of the organization's work.

This issue of UFO-NORGE, dated 1/96, features a prominent cover story titled "ROSWELL-FILMEN, EN 16mm MARE!" (The Roswell Film, a 16mm Nightmare!) by Odd-Gunnar Røed. The magazine also includes articles on a laser pen, an exclusive belt buckle, and mentions two films/books: "Roswell The Movie" and "Without Consent". The publisher is UFO-NORGE, and the language is Norwegian.

The Roswell Film Debate

The main article by Odd-Gunnar Røed meticulously dissects the controversial Roswell autopsy film, which first surfaced in August 1995. Røed notes the intense debate and counter-arguments that have emerged, particularly online. He questions the motives of Ray Santilli and Volker Spielberg, who claim to possess the film, and highlights the significant delay in having the film analyzed by Kodak, the industry standard. Røed expresses a desire for a definitive, competent analysis to settle the matter, rather than continued arguments.

He discusses the 'phone line' argument, where the type of telephone visible in the film is debated for its historical accuracy, with claims it might be too modern for 1947. The article also touches upon the 'J.B.' story, referring to the alleged cameraman, and the potential for miscommunication or fabrication in his account.

Kodak's representative, Peter Milson, outlines the tests required for film dating (acid and pH levels, perforation shrinkage), emphasizing the need for significant film samples. Bob Shell, a photographic investigator, offers his expertise, suggesting that film base changes in 1957 could help date the film. He also points out potential issues with perforation measurements and the possibility of identifying films made before 1956 based on edge markings.

Shell also recounts an incident where he was invited to a secret meeting in London with alleged key figures in the UFO field, including Santilli and others. This meeting was reportedly canceled due to information leaks online, leading to Shell feeling unfairly targeted.

Analysis of the Autopsy Film

Ole Jonny Brænne contributes a critical analysis of the 'autopsy' footage. He raises several points of doubt regarding its authenticity:

1. The Beings: The film depicts a being with six fingers, contradicting most Roswell accounts which mention four-fingered beings. This discrepancy suggests the beings might not be from the Roswell crash.
2. Timing: The alleged cameraman 'J.B.' places the autopsy in early June 1947, while the Roswell incident is widely dated to July 2-4, 1947. This temporal difference could imply two separate crashes or a fabricated timeline.
3. The Autopsy Procedure: The autopsy appears to be completed within two to three hours, which Brænne deems unrealistic for an unknown alien body.
4. Wreckage Markings: Markings on the alleged wreckage are described as resembling "VIDEO TV", suggesting a modern forgery rather than alien script.
5. Trinity Test Connection: 'J.B.' claims to have filmed the Trinity atomic bomb tests, but records indicate only four civilian photographers were present, none of whom were military filmmakers like 'J.B.'
6. XH-20 Helicopter Filming: 'J.B.' also claims to have filmed test flights of the XH-20 helicopter, but McDonnell Douglas states they used their own personnel for such filming.

Brænne also discusses the 'telt-scenen' (tent scene), noting its poor lighting and the description of a being with six fingers and toes, which contradicts other sources. He also questions the 'Restricted Access' and 'A01 Classification' markings seen in the tent scene, deeming them fabricated.

Other UFO-Related Topics

Paul Deveraux and 'Earth Lights': Erling Strand reports on a trip to northwestern Australia with UFO investigator Paul Deveraux. Deveraux is known for his theory that many UFO phenomena are 'earth lights' – unexplained lights originating from geologically active zones. This theory, based on 'Tectonic Strain Theory' (TST), suggests that geological stresses can create light phenomena, potentially linked to quantum physics and 'zero-point energy' (ZPE). The research aims to understand these phenomena and their connection to UFOs.

Project Hessdalen: The article mentions ongoing observations in Hessdalen, Norway, and notes similarities to phenomena observed in Australia. The research group ICRL (International Consciousness Research Laboratories) is involved in studying these 'earth lights'.

The 'Cameraman's Story': The issue revisits the controversy surrounding the alleged cameraman 'J.B.'. Bob Shell initially claimed to have a tape of 'J.B.'s' statement but later denied it, attributing any English phrasing to a transcription error by Santilli's secretary. The article questions the credibility of Santilli and his associates for not coming forward more transparently.

Volker Spielberg and TF1: The French TV channel TF1 investigated Ray Santilli's claims, revealing significant discrepancies. Spielberg, who allegedly financed Santilli, is quoted expressing a dismissive attitude towards public interest in the film.

The Roswell Incident Timeline: The article notes the US Air Force report from September 1994, which attributed the Roswell incident to the secret 'Project Mogul'. This report is contrasted with the GAO report from July 1995.

UFO-NORGE's Online Presence: The magazine announces its presence on the World Wide Web (WWW) with two URLs provided, and the establishment of a Norwegian newsgroup for UFO discussions.

Product Sales: UFO-NORGE is offering the 'Roswell The Movie' on video for 350 NOK plus shipping, and also mentions a laser pointer and belt buckle for sale.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently adopts a critical yet open-minded stance towards UFO phenomena, particularly the Roswell incident. There is a strong emphasis on scientific investigation, evidence analysis, and debunking hoaxes. The editorial team encourages readers to seek verifiable facts and expresses frustration with unsubstantiated claims and ongoing debates within the UFO community. The magazine actively promotes its own research and publications, while also engaging with international UFO research efforts. The overall tone suggests a commitment to uncovering the truth, even if it means challenging popular narratives or exposing fraudulent claims. The recurring theme is the persistent mystery of UFOs and the challenges in separating fact from fiction.

Title: UFO
Issue: 1/96
Publication Date: January 1996 (inferred from issue number)
Publisher: UFO-NORGE
Country: Norway
Language: Norwegian

This issue of UFO magazine delves into various aspects of UFO research, including scientific investigations, personal expedition accounts, and critical analysis of visual evidence.

Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research (PEAR)

The magazine features an article on the Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research (PEAR) program, established at Princeton University in 1979 by Professor Robert G. Jahn. The program's goal is to conduct thorough scientific research into potential interactions between human consciousness and physical systems. A multidisciplinary team of engineers, physicists, psychologists, and humanists have developed theoretical models to understand the role of human consciousness in physical reality.

Two main types of experiments are highlighted:

Anomalies in Human-Machine Interaction

These experiments explore how individuals, using only their willpower, can influence the output of various mechanical, electronic, optical, and fluid-based apparatus. While normal operation yields random results, PEAR experiments show results attributable to the mental influence of the test subjects. Thousands of such experiments have been conducted with hundreds of subjects, observing small but statistically significant and repeatable effects, often dependent on the individual.

Remote Perception ("Remote Viewing")

Another type of experiment demonstrates subjects' ability to gather information about geographical locations, irrespective of time and distance, using methods beyond conventional sensory or technical means. In these tests, an 'agent' is at a specific location observing and forming impressions, while a 'recipient' far away, without prior knowledge, attempts to perceive the same information. Results suggest an 'anomalous' method of information transfer that is largely time and distance independent.

Theoretical Models

To explain these anomalous findings, PEAR has developed new theoretical models based on principles of quantum mechanics, particularly those related to complementarity and wave resonance. These models suggest that the observed phenomena are predictable events within extended, yet traditional, natural scientific understanding of coupled human-machine and human-human systems.

PEAR is part of Princeton University's Human Information Processing Group (HIP) and collaborates with the International Consciousness Research Laboratories (ICRL), involving researchers from various fields interested in the role of human consciousness. They also organize seminars and symposia and contribute to the Journal of Scientific Exploration.

Australian Expedition

The issue includes a detailed account of an expedition to Australia undertaken by the author and colleagues, Lloyd Miller and Paul. The trip involved transporting specialized equipment, including a fluxgate magnetometer, analog and digital recorders, a spectrum analyzer, and video equipment.

Travel and Initial Observations

The journey began with logistical challenges, including overweight baggage restrictions. After flying from London via Dubai and Singapore, they arrived in Brunei and then Darwin, Australia. They traveled to a remote ranch in the Australian outback, which served as their base for 12 days.

During their stay, they conducted numerous observations of unexplained light phenomena. Early observations on October 3rd included white and red lights. Subsequent nights yielded multiple sightings of white point lights, some lasting only seconds. The expedition faced vehicle problems, causing delays and requiring them to set up equipment late at night.

Instrumentation and Measurements

On October 4th, they encountered difficulties with their vehicle, getting stuck and having to unload equipment. By 18:30, the spectrum analyzer and antenna were set up. The generator powering the instruments ran out of fuel earlier than expected, cutting short measurements at midnight. However, the spectrum analyzer recorded significant signals between 88.2 MHz and 560 MHz. Visual observations that night included a light in the east-northeast and a yellow-white light in the northeast.

Two participants experienced a peculiar, intense mood shift between 1:00 and 2:00 AM, described as a pressing feeling of a presence, which lasted for about an hour. This shared experience, noted by at least two individuals, was significant enough to be remembered vividly.

Indigenous Encounters

On October 6th, the team visited a local Aboriginal village. The Aboriginal people expressed fear of the light phenomena, warning children not to follow them, citing dangers like falling off cliffs or being eaten by crocodiles. The author suggests this fear stems from the unknown and mysterious nature of the phenomena, rather than a direct physical threat. The Aboriginals also spoke of a 'very openly' about a 'being' they feared, described in a way that reminded the author of Norwegian folklore creatures like 'nisse' and 'troll'.

Further Observations and Data

By October 7th, instruments were set up in a tent for protection. No visual observations were made that night, despite remaining out until 03:00.

On October 8th, after extensive daylight testing of equipment, the night yielded several observations of point lights and strong magnetic field readings correlating with the visual sightings. Several photographs of the light phenomena were taken.

October 9th saw further observations of distant lightning and a shift in wind direction, leading to a premature departure due to the risk of monsoon rains and impassable roads.

Return and Analysis

The expedition concluded on October 11th, with the team packing up their equipment. The return journey began on October 12th, and the author arrived home on October 15th, satisfied that all instruments had returned safely.

The most interesting measurements were recorded by the magnetometer, showing magnetic pulsations approximately 1000 times stronger than normal. Analysis of this data, in collaboration with Jon Bjordal at the University of Bergen, was ongoing. The researchers were seeking similar measurements from nearby stations in Australia to determine if these anomalies were localized. Reports of 'magnetic anomalies' in Alice Springs, Australia, were being investigated for confirmation.

A technical report detailing the expedition's results was expected to be published before summer.

Cover Story: "Now it must stop misunderstandings!"

The cover story addresses the issue of misinterpreting UFO footage, using an example from a video filmed by Glenn Webster in Norwich, England, on November 3, 1995. The article argues that the 'disk-like' or 'Batman-like' shape often seen in such footage is not the actual form of the phenomenon but rather a result of uncontrolled zooming and poor focusing by video cameras.

It references a TV-2 segment from August 8, 1994, showing an amateur video of a similar phenomenon over Arendal, Norway, which was later revealed to be a hot air balloon with lights. The author emphasizes the need for users of video technology to understand its limitations, including how optical effects can distort the appearance of objects, especially in low-light conditions. The article calls for the press and media to be more critical and to consult UFO-NORGE for clarification.

Back Matter

Back Issues and Theme Issues

Page 5 provides an overview of available back issues of UFO magazine from 1982 to 1995, with prices listed for A4 copies and originals. It also details five special theme issues published by UFO-NORGE, covering topics such as Nikola Tesla, the Spitsbergen UFO incident, the relationship between UFOs and religious belief, historical Norwegian UFO sightings, and close encounters of the third kind.

Submissions and Support

Information is provided for submitting articles and contributions to the magazine, including guidelines for manuscript preparation and image submission. Readers are encouraged to share clippings from other publications and to volunteer as translators. A call is also made for financial support for UFO-NORGE through a "Support Fund."

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue of UFO magazine demonstrates a strong commitment to rigorous scientific investigation, as exemplified by the detailed reporting on the PEAR program and the Australian expedition. There is a clear emphasis on empirical data, instrumentation, and theoretical modeling. Simultaneously, the magazine takes a critical stance against sensationalism and misinterpretation of evidence, particularly concerning visual media, advocating for a more discerning approach from both the public and the media. The inclusion of indigenous perspectives adds a cultural dimension to the discussion of unexplained phenomena. The overall editorial stance appears to be one of promoting informed inquiry and debunking unsubstantiated claims while acknowledging the genuine mystery surrounding certain phenomena.