UFO - 1995 No 3 No 4

Magazine Overview

This issue of UFO Magazine, number 3/4 from 1995, is a double issue from the 14th year of publication. It is the "only special magazine on UFO phenomena in Norway" and is published by UFO-NORGE. The cover prominently features images related to the "Roswell Film," posing the question of whether it is a "hundred-year sensation or an incredible hoax?" It also questions the credibility of Ray Santilli. The issue includes a cover price of 90 Norwegian Kroner for single copies and an annual subscription of 150 Kroner.

Editorial Section: From the Editor

The editorial section, written by Mentz Kaarbø, acknowledges that this is a double issue (Nr. 3/4, 1995) due to difficulties in producing four separate issues that year. He notes that while delays have been common, the magazine has generally maintained its annual output. This double issue offers 72 pages, providing four extra pages of content compared to two single issues. The cover's focus on the "Roswell Film" is explained as a response to the current media trend. Odd-Gunnar Røed, a staff writer, has been abroad to a BUFORA conference in Sheffield and has met with key figures involved in the Roswell film events. A report on the film begins on page 14. The magazine is advertising the Roswell film, though not guaranteeing its authenticity. UFO-NORGE has experienced increased media exposure, with mentions in "Holmgang," "X-files," "VG," and "Glåmdalen," but this has not translated into a significant increase in interest or inquiries. The transition from a membership organization to a subscription-based magazine is mentioned, with a note about reader feedback on this change. As of December 11th, the magazine has 952 subscribers, an increase of 107 from the previous year, with a goal of reaching 1000 subscribers by the end of the year. The magazine is considering distribution through Narvesen (a newsstand chain) in the future, but economic viability is a concern based on a previous unsuccessful attempt.

Table of Contents

• The issue features a detailed table of contents, including:
• Editorial (Leder)
• Report News (Rapportnytt)
• Roswell Film - Hoax or Reality?
• BUFORA Conference
• What Do We See and What Do We Remember?
• GAO Report Completed
• Book Reviews
• Astrology
• Letters to the Editor (Leserbrev)
• Project Hessdalen
• UFO Phenomenon and Technology
• Rauni-Leena Luukanen - a Bluffmaker of Dimensions Part 2
• Press Clippings
• Astronomy
• UFO Annual Review (Årgangs-UFO)
• Holmgang on TV 2
• What Did Finn C. Encounter at Ringkollen?
• Focus on 4th Degree Close Encounters
• Comments on Cover Images

Report News (Rapportnytt)

This section, by Odd-Gunnar Røed, focuses on "close encounters" of the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd degrees, and also features four 4th-degree close encounters. The magazine thanks the public for their submitted reports.

Vollstad at Mortenhals in Troms

A report from a retired person, Daniel Vollstad, describes observing a stationary, white, "money light" (pengelys) about 15 meters from a house in Balsfjorden in the early 1930s. The light was about the size of a light bulb and was visible in the dark.

Framneslia near Narvik in Nordland

In October 1975, around 11:30 PM, a round (oval) UFO descended towards a car near Framneslia airport. It stopped above the car, and two short beings with large heads and eyes, and no hair, were seen inside. The UFO then ascended rapidly.

Between Sannes and Vefall in Telemark

In the autumn of 1988, between 7:30 PM and 8:30 PM, Marit Slåen and her son observed a luminous, yellow-white sphere that followed their car. The object was described as friendly and did not cause fear. It waited for them when they slowed down and then accelerated away at high speed.

A Companion?

This section continues Marit Slåen's account, detailing how the luminous sphere followed her car. She describes it as a "flying sphere" that kept pace with her vehicle. When she stopped, the sphere waited. It then moved over a marsh and hovered about 400 meters away before accelerating away at high speed. She mentions that pictures of a flying sphere were taken in the same time period on Jomfruland.

Søm near Kristiansand in Vest Agder

On December 10, 1990, between 12:30 PM and 1:00 PM, a reflective metallic, possibly black, object was observed for 30-40 minutes. The sound was uncertain.

Flying Triangle

Mona Hildebrand reported seeing a flying triangle in Søm, Vest Agder, in 1990.

UFO-NORGE Report Central

This section presents a situational report from May 15 to December 1, 1995, listing numerous UFO observations across Norway with dates, times, durations, colors, sounds, and descriptions. It also includes a map of Norway with numbered locations corresponding to the reports.

Overview of Observations Made by Local Groups in UFO-NORGE

This section provides a list of local UFO-NORGE groups and their contact information, including groups in Tønsberg, Sandefjord, Rogaland, Stavanger, Hedemarken, and Nord-Norge, as well as an astronomy contact.

Observations from Mandal in Vest-Agder

This section details observations made near Mandal. In the fall of '92/'93, a "boat" was seen in a bay. On July 20, 1995, a large, luminous object with changing colors was observed from a cabin. On August 19, 1995, a powerful light illuminated the area, and a "craft" with lights and openings was seen over the water.

Gravdal in Lofoten

In the winter of 1991, three intense lights were observed about 20 meters above the ground. They followed the observers before accelerating into the sky.

Three Lights in Formation

A report from Nord-Norge describes three intense lights seen about 20 meters above the ground. They followed the observers before accelerating into the sky. The observers were shaken and ran home to tell their parents. The local university stated that the phenomenon could not be explained by known natural phenomena.

Drag in Nordland

In October 1993, a bright light, described as a shooting star, was observed. It was accompanied by a smell of white smoke and a "crackling" sound. The report mentions that Drag is a known area for UFO phenomena.

Children Surprised by "Noisy" Light

This section details an event where children in Drag observed multi-colored lights and smoke clouds. They heard a sound like thunder. The object had a "square window" on its underside and "hatches" that opened. The object moved rapidly.

Komsafjellet in Alta, Finnmark

On September 28, 1995, a blue-white light with a red-flamed tail was observed. The light illuminated the observer and her dogs. The object disappeared rapidly, leaving a smoky trail.

Spjelkavik near Ålesund in Møre & Romsdal

On November 11, 1995, a round, glass-like object that suddenly lit up and accelerated at high speed was observed. The observer, a pilot trainee, stated it was unlike any known aircraft.

Grostølsnuten, Seljestad in Hordaland

On May 1, 1957/58, a white-blue, metallic object was observed for about 15 minutes. There was a possible "whooshing" sound. The report mentions a "scary ski trip" where five people experienced this event.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the Roswell Film controversy and numerous UFO sightings reported across Norway. The magazine maintains a stance of investigating and reporting on these phenomena, presenting witness accounts and official data from UFO-NORGE. The editorial stance is to inform the public about UFO events and encourage further investigation, while also acknowledging the need for financial stability and wider distribution for the magazine.

This issue of UFO 3-4/95, published by UFO-NORGE, focuses heavily on the controversial Roswell film and related UFO phenomena. The magazine features detailed analysis, witness accounts, and expert opinions, aiming to shed light on these often-debated topics.

The Roswell Film: Bluff or Reality?

The central theme of this issue is the infamous Roswell film, with multiple articles dedicated to its analysis and authenticity. The cover story, "ROSWELL-FILMEN - BLØFF ELLER VIRKELIGHET?" by Odd-Gunnar Røed, details the public viewing of the film at a BUFORA conference in Sheffield. The film, purportedly shot in 1947, shows what appears to be the autopsy of an alien being. The article discusses the film's potential origins, the challenges in verifying its authenticity, and the skepticism it has faced.

Michael Heseman introduces the film, emphasizing that its genuineness was unknown at the time of the screening. Ray Santilli, the alleged owner of the film, is presented, and his story of acquiring it from a cameraman is recounted. The cameraman, identified only as "Jack," claims to have filmed the events in 1947 while serving in the US Army. He describes the recovery of a crashed "flying saucer" and the subsequent autopsy.

Bob Shell, a photographic expert, provides a material analysis of the film, concluding that its physical characteristics, including the film base (acetate propionate) and the type of film used ("Cine Kodak Super XX High Speed Panchromatic Safety Film"), are consistent with a production date of 1947. He notes that the film's quality and the 'high speed' nature of the film stock would have made it susceptible to degradation over time, especially if not properly stored. Shell's analysis suggests the film was likely exposed and developed relatively soon after its production.

However, the issue also presents counterarguments and skepticism. The article "Trolig lureri?" (Likely Deception?) explores potential scenarios for the film's creation, including it being a deliberate hoax for financial gain or a disinformation tactic by the US military to cover up other events. The author questions the logic behind creating such a film in 1947 if it were a hoax, especially given the poor quality of some segments.

Further analysis comes from a viewing of the film by Norwegian pathologists, Tor Carsten Nygren and Jan Marius Junge. They comment on the autopsy scenes, noting that the procedure appeared to be performed by surgeons rather than pathologists and that the work seemed rushed. Their most striking observation was regarding the brain, which they described as "not human," being smooth, dark, and showing clear signs of bleeding, indicating recent use. They concluded that the brain did not belong to a human.

Odd-Gunnar Røed's "Roswell-filmen - siste nytt" (Roswell Film - Latest News) provides updates on the case, mentioning expert analysis of film details, the emergence of new witnesses, and the US Army Air Force reopening a mine in the Roswell area. It highlights the ongoing debate and the need for professional investigation.

UFO Sightings in Norway

The issue also reports on UFO sightings within Norway. A significant account is from Skjernøy, Mandal, where three individuals observed unidentified objects on July 19, 1995. The report describes two red, cigar-shaped craft with blinking lights that moved at high speed, followed by a larger "mothership." The observation lasted approximately 1.5 hours.

Another report details an incident on Mosseveien where three young women experienced a loss of time (over an hour) while driving. They observed a strange, rocket-like object near their car. These individuals have since been interviewed by UFO-NORGE and Dr. Jan Marius Junge as part of a pilot project.

An article about a "giant searchlight" on the East Coast mentions its use during the war and its potential for signaling. It also touches upon the unusual atmospheric conditions during a recent test.

UFO-NORGE and Hypnosis

UFO-NORGE is actively involved in investigating UFO phenomena, including a pilot project focused on "close contacts of the 4th kind," which involves hypnosis to recover lost time and memories. Dr. Jan Marius Junge, a doctor with experience in psychiatry and pathology, is leading this project. The article explains the process and the psychological impact of retrieving traumatic memories through hypnosis.

Media Coverage and Other Reports

The magazine notes TV-3's involvement in covering UFO phenomena in the Mandal area, with a program titled "Grenseland" scheduled for broadcast. It also mentions a report about Danish UFO organizations taking action against TV 2 for misrepresenting their views on UFOs.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the persistent mystery surrounding the Roswell incident, the analysis of evidence (particularly the film), and the ongoing efforts by organizations like UFO-NORGE to investigate and understand UFO phenomena. The editorial stance appears to be one of open-minded inquiry, encouraging critical examination of evidence while acknowledging the possibility of genuine extraterrestrial encounters. There is a strong emphasis on the need for professional investigation and verification of claims, while also cautioning readers against unsubstantiated information, particularly from the internet. The magazine promotes a scientific and analytical approach to the subject matter, even when dealing with controversial topics like the Roswell film.

This issue of UFO 3-4/95, published by UFO-NORGE, focuses on the examination of UFO evidence, with a prominent feature on the controversial 'Roswell' film. The magazine delves into the analysis of the film, the criticisms it has faced, and the ongoing debate about its authenticity. It also reports on the 8th International BUFORA Congress, offering insights into various presentations and discussions within the UFO community. The issue includes critical reviews of official reports, such as the GAO's investigation into the Roswell incident, and explores the psychological aspects of witness testimony and memory.

The Roswell Film and its Analysis

The article "Roswell-filmen - siste nytt" discusses the analysis of the 'Roswell' film, noting that an initial analysis by Bob Shell was problematic because the alien entity was not included in the analyzed segment. Ray Santilli, the film's owner, is mentioned as having bought the film for a significant sum and is interested in recouping his investment. The article addresses the question of why the film wasn't analyzed earlier, suggesting Santilli's financial interests and the desire to avoid further pressure after the film's release. It also touches upon Santilli's alleged purchase of Elvis Presley material, which is presented as possibly an option agreement rather than a direct purchase. The article also revisits earlier criticisms of the film's authenticity, such as claims of anachronisms like a rotary phone and wall clock, and the use of plastic. It clarifies that these items have been identified as genuine from the 1930s and that the 'plastic' might be a misunderstanding of glass. The article defends the tent scene, explaining that the alien appears 'flat' due to body gases, which may have caused fear of contagion.

The 8th International BUFORA Congress

"UFOs: EXAMINING THE EVIDENCE" by Odd-Gunnar Røed details the 8th International BUFORA Congress held in Sheffield on August 19, 1995. The event generated immense anticipation due to the screening of a film allegedly shot in 1947 showing a strange, non-human entity. Security was tight, with attendees required to surrender cameras and undergo searches, leading to some grumbling and accusations of 'scandal' against Santilli. The congress proceedings, or 'proceedings,' were meticulously prepared by BUFORA. The guest of honor was Walter Andrus Jr. from MUFON USA, known for his support of the Ed Walters' Gulf Breeze case, though this stance is noted as controversial.

Speakers and Presentations at BUFORA

Malcolm Robinson from Scotland, a humorous speaker, captivated the audience with tales of strange phenomena in his homeland. Maurizio Vergas from Italy discussed the technical tools available to UFO researchers, highlighting the confusion arising from different methodologies and the need for standardized approaches. He expressed regret that a common language for UFO research doesn't exist, which would facilitate the immediate adoption of solutions by researchers worldwide.

Russian speakers Sergey Chernous (Ph.D.) and Yulii V. Platov (physicist) presented, despite language barriers and nervousness. They shared interesting UFO-related information, though much of it had been heard before. Their presentations were noted for their technical aspects and the contrast between Eastern and Western equipment, with some items appearing outdated.

Per Andersen from SUFOI presented on 'double moons' and how they can occur optically, describing it as an unusual phenomenon observed on rare occasions.

Dr. Leo Sprinkle, a psychologist, delivered a theatrical and engaging presentation, focusing on the psychological and parapsychological aspects of the UFO phenomenon. He suggested that hypnosis should be a crucial part of future research into near-contact experiences (CE-IV), as these events can sometimes be perceived by observers as premonitions.

Cynthia Hind from South Africa, known for her sharp wit, presented a case of an alleged alien craft visit to a school in Zimbabwe, including video interviews with children.

Dr. Helmut Lammer from Austria discussed the controversial 'face on Mars,' concluding that it is likely a natural geological formation.

Peter Robbins presented the Bentwaters incident of December 1980, comparing it to the Roswell case and noting the involvement of the US Army. He described observations of lights and a moving object with a transformer-like sound.

Vincente-Juan Ballester Olmos, despite his long involvement in UFO research since 1979, was noted for presenting similar material with outdated slides, suggesting a lack of progress in his approach.

The Film Screening

The article describes the tense atmosphere leading up to the screening of the 'Roswell' film. Attendees were subjected to strict security measures, and the anticipation was palpable. The film itself was presented by Ray Santilli, who provided context for its viewing. The screening was described as a moment of intense focus, with the audience eager to absorb the experience. The article notes that many found the film disturbing, particularly the depiction of bodily fluids.

Psychological Aspects of Witness Testimony and Memory

"HVA SER VI OG HVA HUSKER VI?" by Odd-Gunnar Røed continues a series on the brain and perception. The article explores how the brain reconstructs memories, especially in stressful situations, often filling in gaps with imagination to create a coherent narrative. It highlights that witness testimony can be unreliable, citing a German study where only five out of 250 witness accounts were error-free. The article discusses the 'weapon effect' in memory, where focus narrows to a central element, like a weapon or a UFO, at the expense of other details. It explains that the brain 'covers up' these gaps to avoid appearing helpless.

Experiments are described where participants' perceptions of an event varied significantly based on subtle framing or their expectations. For instance, reactions to a staged theft differed based on the perceived status of the perpetrator (priest, businessman, worker). The article also touches on the impact of shock on memory, citing a case where a woman could not recall the appearance of an armed intruder she had interacted with for 20 minutes.

Eva Smith, a doctor of law, emphasizes that fear and anxiety impair a witness's ability to recall events accurately. The article stresses the importance of neutral questioning and avoiding leading questions, as subtle linguistic nuances can significantly influence responses. An experiment involving a car crash scenario demonstrated how the wording of a question ('hit' vs. 'crashed') affected participants' estimates of speed and their recall of details like broken headlights.

The article concludes that people are easily influenced, even when conscious, and this is likely amplified under hypnosis. It warns against leading questions in UFO investigations, stating that neutrality is paramount. The organization UFO-NORGE is initiating a pilot project on CE-IV (close encounters of the fourth kind) to study individuals who believe they have experienced such events.

The GAO Report on Roswell

"GAO-RAPPORTEN FERDIG" by Ole Jonny Brænne reviews the report from the General Accounting Office (GAO) in the USA regarding its investigation into the Roswell incident. The GAO's investigation, initiated in March 1994 at the request of Senator Steven H. Schiff, aimed to locate administrative archival material related to the Roswell case from July 1947. The US Air Force's own report, "Report of Air Force Research Regarding the Roswell Incident" by Richard L. Weaver, is mentioned as having received significant criticism.

The GAO report, released in July 1995, found that administrative documents from the Roswell Army Air Forces (RAAF) between March 1945 and December 1949, as well as outgoing messages from October 1946 to December 1949, were missing from the archives. These documents were intended to be permanently archived and could have provided clarity on the events of July 1947. The report could not identify which entity, organization, or person was responsible for the destruction or removal of these documents.

The article notes that the missing documents lend support to the theory of a cover-up. Further suspicion arises from the fact that the archives of the 1395th Military Police Company (Aviation), which was stationed at RAAF, are also missing. This unit played a role in securing the crash site and transporting debris and personnel. The archives of other units stationed at RAAF, such as the 509th Bomb Group and the 1st Air Transport Unit, were transferred to the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) in St. Louis in 1953.

The GAO report itself acknowledges that its search was complicated by missing records without explanation. The report has faced criticism for only directly contacting a minority of relevant organizations and for not having the mandate to exert pressure when suspecting information was withheld. The GAO contacted organizations like the CIA, DoD, FBI, NSC, and the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, with the FBI providing a known telex message and the DoD referring to the USAF/Weaver report. Other organizations claimed to have no Roswell-related material. The article points out that these claims were not independently verified by the GAO. The GAO also did not contact agencies like the DIA, NRO, or NSA.

The overall impression is that the GAO conducted a reluctant and inadequate investigation. The report did not find any evidence to support the USAF's explanation of secret balloon launches related to Project Mogul, nor did it uncover any new documents related to the Roswell incident. The article suggests that 'someone' may have systematically removed traces of a possible cover-up. It remains unclear whether the GAO thoroughly searched archives in Fort Worth and Washington D.C. for communications between RAAF and its superiors.

The Roswell case is therefore considered unresolved and likely to remain a subject of intense debate and calls for further investigation.

Book Review: "Bortført av UFO - Nærkontakt av fjerde grad" by Nils Petter Thuesen

This review of Nils Petter Thuesen's book "Bortført av UFO - Nærkontakt av fjerde grad" (Abducted by UFO - Close Encounter of the Fourth Kind) criticizes the author's consistent use of 'UFO' to refer specifically to alien spacecraft, rather than the broader definition of an Unidentified Flying Object. The reviewer argues that this narrow usage hinders the scientific community's acceptance of the phenomenon. The book is described as a one-sided defense of the spaceship theory, suggesting that Earth is being invaded by 'small grey men' for breeding purposes. While acknowledging the book's interesting aspects for those drawn to this theory, the reviewer finds it unbalanced and lacking in critical analysis. The review points out that the book uses examples from cases already identified as fraudulent, such as Ed Walters' Gulf Breeze evidence, and that pseudonyms like 'James Randley' and 'Philip Spencer' are used, making it difficult to trace the original sources. The reviewer emphasizes the importance of referencing sources directly and accurately, noting that the book's extensive bibliography makes it hard to determine the origin of specific claims. The review concludes that while the book contributes to the UFO debate, it falls short of being a balanced platform and urges readers to demand more rigorous research from authors and greater engagement from established scientists.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently promotes a critical and investigative approach to UFO phenomena. There is a strong emphasis on the need for scientific rigor, accurate reporting, and the avoidance of leading questions in witness interviews. The editorial stance appears to be that while UFOs are a real phenomenon worthy of study, many claims, particularly those involving alien spacecraft and abductions, require substantial evidence beyond anecdotal accounts. The magazine highlights the psychological factors that can influence perception and memory, suggesting that these play a significant role in how UFO experiences are reported and interpreted. There is a clear skepticism towards unsubstantiated claims and a call for more balanced and evidence-based research within the UFO community. The publication also seems to advocate for a more open and scientific discussion of UFOs, aiming to bridge the gap between mainstream science and ufology.

This issue of UFO magazine, dated 1995 and identified as issue 3-4/95, is published by UFO-NORGE from Norway. The cover prominently features the controversial "ROSWELL" footage, advertised as "the original uncut raw footage" available on video for a limited time. The cover text emphasizes that the tape is protected by Macrovision and cannot be copied, and invites readers to draw their own conclusions after considering the evidence and authentication research contained within.

Articles and Content

Roswell Footage Offer

The initial pages detail an offer to purchase the "Roswell Footage" video. It states that the tape contains material from the alleged Roswell cameraman and is protected by Macrovision. The text acknowledges controversy surrounding the material's existence, content, and quality, noting that authentication research has been completed and is also on the tape. It urges prompt ordering due to limited copies, with a guarantee of delivery by August 28th for orders placed by July 31st. The offer includes prices for UK and overseas orders, with options for PAL, NTSC, and SECAM formats. Payment can be made by cheque or credit card. The offer is from UFO-NORGE, Box 24, N-3133 Duken, Norway, and also provides a postal address in Marlow, Bucks, England.

Crucially, the offer includes disclaimers:
1. While the film stock is verified as 1947 manufactured, the filming date of 1947 cannot be currently warranted.
2. Medical reports suggested the creature was not human, but this cannot be verified.
3. The footage's origin from the Roswell incident has not yet been verified.
4. Due to its origins, the footage is not up to broadcast quality.

Astrologi (Astrology) by Evelyn Bakken

This section delves into the nature of astrology, contrasting popular, simplified versions found in magazines with more complex, serious astrological practice. The author, Evelyn Bakken, explains the key components of a horoscope: the Ascendant (outer demeanor), the Sun sign (core self, masculine side), the Moon sign (emotional needs, feminine side), and Mercury (thinking and communication). The outer planets (Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, Pluto) are mentioned but deferred for later discussion.

Bakken addresses the common complaint that astrological descriptions don't fit individuals. This is explained by the influence of the Ascendant and other planetary positions, which modify the Sun sign's characteristics. For example, atypically direct and impulsive Aries might appear cautious and reserved if their Ascendant is in Cancer. The author uses examples like a Scorpio with a Gemini Ascendant and a Leo with a Virgo Ascendant to illustrate how the Ascendant can create a different outward impression than the core Sun sign, leading to feelings of being misunderstood.

The article also touches upon the calculation of horoscopes, noting that while PCs now handle complex calculations, understanding the principles is still important. Bakken promises to discuss the Moon's influence in the next installment.

Anton Lidstrøm Død (Anton Lidstrøm Deceased)

This is an obituary for Anton Lidstrøm, who passed away in May. He is remembered as an active member of UFO-NORGE in its early days (mid-1970s) when it was known as Norsk UFO Center. Lidstrøm was particularly active in the Trondheim branch and had been involved in establishing the Trondheim UFO association before it merged with Norsk UFO Center in 1973. Although less active in organizational matters in later years, he maintained a keen interest in the UFO phenomenon until his death. He was involved in investigating an observation in the previous year, and materials from this investigation were sent to the editorial office shortly before he passed away. The obituary is signed by Mentz Kaarbo.

Leserbrev (Letters to the Editor)

This section features several letters from readers, engaging in debates about astrology, UFO phenomena, and the magazine's editorial direction.

#### Ros, ris, fakta og noen synspunkter (Praise, criticism, facts, and some viewpoints) by Jostein Eliassen

Jostein Eliassen, a 29-year-old from Saltdal, Nordland, praises UFO-NORGE's activities, highlighting their importance for understanding the UFO phenomenon and potentially aiding human development and resource management. He commends the magazine's new format but criticizes some of its content. Eliassen argues that while UFO-NORGE's scientific approach is positive, it should not dismiss or ridicule reports of phenomena like alien abductions, which he believes are real for many. He criticizes headlines like "Rekord i vrøvl" (Record in nonsense) and "Fem minutters vanvidd" (Five minutes of madness) from a previous issue. He suggests that ETs might possess technology allowing physical transport through walls, possibly involving antigravitational energy or altered molecular states, or even astral projection. He speculates on reasons for alien abductions, including creating a new intelligent race, copying human bodies, or borrowing genetic material due to alien physiological weaknesses.

#### Response to Jostein Eliassen

The response from UFO-NORGE thanks Eliassen for his feedback. It clarifies that UFO-NORGE staff are volunteers and work is unpaid. They defend their approach, stating they investigate all cases presented openly and do not dismiss them. They acknowledge the difficulty of finding concrete proof and welcome more extreme cases that might help shed light on the phenomenon. They express a desire for more analysis from skeptics and suggest that Eliassen's theory, while respected, might be difficult to reconcile with a balanced investigation.

#### Hva astrologi egentlig er (What astrology really is) by Miche Falk

Miche Falk expresses strong skepticism towards astrology, viewing it as "magic, mysticism, and occultism" that appeals to human egocentrism. Falk argues that astrology's popularity stems from people's desire to believe, not from factual basis. Falk raises several points against astrology:
1. Horoscopes are based on the position of planets at birth, but life begins nine months earlier, suggesting prenatal influences might also be significant.
2. The 'forces' or 'energies' from planets are undefined.
3. The only known planetary influence is gravity, which is negligible compared to the gravitational pull of medical staff at birth.
4. The zodiacal constellations have shifted due to the precession of the equinoxes, meaning current astrological interpretations may not align with astronomical reality.
5. The discovery of Uranus (1781), Neptune (1846), and Pluto (1930) means a significant portion of astrological planets are based on modern discoveries, not ancient tradition.
6. The characteristics attributed to Uranus, Neptune, and Pluto lack a clear basis.
7. The general nature of horoscope interpretations allows anyone to identify with them.

#### Response to Miche Falk by Miche Falk (self-response or continuation)

This part seems to be a continuation or a response to Falk's points, possibly from the magazine's perspective or another contributor. It discusses the 13th zodiac sign, Ophiuchus (Slangebæreren), and argues that astrology's claims about it being peripheral are incorrect. It states that tests have consistently shown astrology cannot accurately predict future events or describe personal characteristics. The author defends the magazine's inclusion of astrology, suggesting it's a way for open-minded readers to explore alternative phenomena. They criticize Falk's approach as dismissive and suggest that if Falk has evidence against astrology, they should publish it. The response also mentions the "Astrologisk Leksikon" as a potentially useful resource.

#### Response to Miche Falk by Miche Falk (continued)

This section continues the defense of astrology, arguing that it's not about believing but about observing its effects. The author acknowledges that many astrologers uncritically repeat information from books, a problem they are working to address. They propose that a good astrologer can demonstrate the validity of their practice. The response also addresses the issue of the zodiac shifting, stating that the precession of the equinoxes is accounted for in modern astrology. It defends the use of outer planets like Uranus, Neptune, and Pluto as symbolic of technological advancement and societal change. The author notes that the zodiac is based on myths and collective subconsciousness, and that cultural symbols like Chinese zodiac animals may not resonate universally. They also mention the concept of polarity and how different expressions of the same trait exist within astrological signs.

#### Response to Miche Falk by Miche Falk (further continuation)

This part discusses the use of 12 zodiac signs versus the actual 13 constellations. It defends the use of 12 signs as a traditional framework, comparing it to the number of hours in a day. It also mentions that the axis is shifting from Pisces to Aquarius, marking new eras, but this doesn't affect individual horoscopes. The author reiterates that humans are self-centered and that astrology focuses on the individual. They mention that the five outer planets modify the influence of the five inner planets, and aspects between outer planets describe generations. The author suggests that the criticism of astrology might stem from a lack of understanding or a desire to dismiss it.

#### Response to Miche Falk by Miche Falk (final part)

This final part of the astrology discussion addresses the criticism of astrology's scientific validity. The author requests references for scientific proof that astrology cannot describe human characteristics, questioning the basis of such claims. They reiterate the concept of polarity and how different expressions of traits exist within signs. The author concludes by suggesting that the criticism might be akin to nitpicking, focusing on minor details rather than the broader picture.

Leserbrev (Letters to the Editor) - Continued

#### "Kanaliserte skuffelser fra finsk lege" (Channelled disappointments from a Finnish doctor) by Stein Jarving

Stein Jarving expresses strong disappointment with "channelled books," calling them "swindles." He criticizes a book by Finnish doctor Rauni-Leena Luukanen, "Universets Barn" (Children of the Universe), as being filled with "platitudes, clichés, and mediocre, small-minded moralizing." Jarving argues that the purported "higher cosmic intelligence" sounds like that of a mediocre high school student, and that the book's message is repetitive and poorly written, resembling a "cut-and-paste" job. He suggests that organizations like Bellona and Greenpeace present similar messages more effectively with grounded arguments. Jarving concludes that the book is a superficial, unnecessary work written by an amateur, and criticizes the publisher for not editing it more rigorously.

#### Response to Stein Jarving

The magazine's editorial response agrees with Jarving's points and notes that Luukanen has been discussed in previous issues. They acknowledge the reader's critique of the astrology section, stating that it might obscure the UFO problem. They assert that UFO-NORGE does not take a stance on specific explanations and maintains an open mind.

#### "Hva vi egentlig snakker om" (What we are really talking about)

This letter, signed by UFO-NORGE, addresses the magazine's stance on UFOs. It states that as long as there is no concrete proof, they "only know that we don't know." The letter criticizes the reliance on "belief and indications" despite thousands of UFO sightings. It argues that calling phenomena "UFO" is only appropriate when their nature is unknown; once identified, they are no longer UFOs but IFOs (Identified Flying Objects). The magazine states its aim is to find natural explanations and, when unsuccessful, to archive them as UFOs. They express anticipation for future discoveries that might reveal the nature of these phenomena, whether they are from other worlds, dimensions, time zones, or are products of human imagination, the subconscious, or unknown natural phenomena. The letter concludes by emphasizing that the ultimate truth remains unknown and unproven.

#### "Ros, ris, fakta og noen synspunkter" (Praise, criticism, facts, and some viewpoints) - Continued by Hans Ragnar Norli

Hans Ragnar Norli responds to a letter from Odd-Gunnar Røed. Norli criticizes UFO-NORGE's tendency to attribute UFO sightings to natural phenomena and dismiss the spaceship theory. He questions how natural phenomena can manifest as "silver saucers" moving intelligently, emitting lights, or passing through walls. Norli argues that this dismissive attitude is an insult to witnesses. He criticizes scientists like Erik Tandberg and Professor Kaare Aksnes for claiming that interstellar travel is impossible due to vast distances, calling such statements "primitive and unintelligent." He suggests that advanced civilizations could possess technology far superior to ours. Norli defends the idea of alien abductions and parapsychology, noting that millions of Americans claim to have been abducted and that reputable psychologists consider these accounts credible.

#### UFO-NORGE i "forandring" (UFO-NORGE in "change") by Hans Ragnar Norli

Norli expresses concern over the recent general meeting of UFO-NORGE, where a small group of members allegedly decided to dissolve the organization, which had 830 members. He questions the legality of this decision, citing the lack of presented financial statements. Norli also critiques specific reports published in UFO nr. 1 1995:
1. A report about a "high-dot" object over his property in July 1965, which allegedly came from the southeast and flew north. Norli questions this, noting that Nesherad is north of Funnemark, suggesting the object might have been returning home.
2. A report about a "military exercise" on January 26th, which Norli states was actually on January 12th. He questions what red spheres jets were pursuing if the date was wrong, and wonders if a yellow-white sphere observed was a new secret weapon.

Norli also comments on "Flares over Nisservann," suggesting the direction of the red spheres might align with the location of Nisservann, but notes the distance. He concludes by questioning the comparison to the Roswell incident and expressing confusion over the criticism.

#### Response to Hans Ragnar Norli by Anders Jan Funnemark

Anders Jan Funnemark clarifies UFO-NORGE's transition from membership to subscription. He explains that the organization continues to operate similarly, with the magazine aiming for improved quality. He states that those wishing to be more involved can contact him or committee members to become field researchers. Regarding the 1994 accounts, Funnemark explains they were not finalized at the general meeting but the surplus and balance as of October 1st were presented. He mentions that financial statements are available upon request. Funnemark hopes the improved magazine justifies the change from membership to subscription and notes that organizing resource-intensive general meetings with low attendance is discouraging.

"Bortføringenes dag" (Abduction Day) BUFORA Conference in 1996

This is an announcement for a one-day conference organized by BUFORA (The British UFO Research Association) on April 20, 1996, in Sheffield, England. The conference focuses on the increasing number of CE-IV reports (close encounters of the fourth kind) and related research. Whitley Strieber is announced as a speaker, discussing his experiences that led to the book "Communion." Other speakers include Philip Mantle, John Spencer, and Mike Wootten. British CE-IV "victims," including Linda Jones, are also invited to share their experiences. Ticket orders can be sent to BUFORA (Abduct) in Batley, West Yorkshire, England.

Avstander i universet II (Distances in the universe II)

This article by Knut Ove Hauge continues a previous discussion on UFO phenomena, specifically addressing theories about UFO speeds and the measurement of distances between celestial bodies using frequency. Hauge explains that his theories are based on classical physics formulas and a fractal mathematics formula. He defines fractals as a relatively new area of mathematics discovered by Benoit Mandelbrot in 1975, characterized by self-repeating patterns. Hauge provides formulas for calculating the speed of the gravitational field and the speed of a UFO within it, relating it to phenomena observed in Hessdalen. He then proceeds to calculate the wavelength and frequency based on these principles, using a mathematical pendulum model for Earth's rotation. The calculations aim to demonstrate a relationship between frequency and distance.

#### Response to Knut Ove Hauge

This response, signed by Jan Quam, states that while Hauge's initial letter discussed UFO speeds, his current explanation delves into physics calculations that the respondent cannot fully comprehend. Quam expresses that he has lost track of Hauge's argument and hopes Hauge finds someone who can understand his reasoning.

Hva vi egentlig snakker om (What we are really talking about)

This editorial piece from UFO-NORGE reiterates the organization's stance: "as long as we don't have concrete proof, we only know that we don't know." It criticizes the reliance on belief and indications despite numerous UFO sightings. The editorial clarifies that "UFO" is a term for unknown phenomena; once identified, they are no longer UFOs but IFOs. UFO-NORGE aims to find natural explanations and, failing that, archives them as UFOs. They express anticipation for future revelations about the nature of these phenomena, whether they originate from other worlds, dimensions, time zones, or are products of imagination, the subconscious, or unknown natural phenomena. The core message is that the ultimate truth remains unknown and unproven.

"Kanaliserte skuffelser fra finsk lege" (Channelled disappointments from a Finnish doctor) - Response

This response, likely from the editorial team, acknowledges the previous letter and agrees with its points. It notes that the phenomenon of Rauni-Leena Luukanen has been discussed in previous issues. The response also addresses the reader's criticism of the astrology section, stating that while it might obscure the UFO problem, UFO-NORGE maintains an open mind and does not take a stance on specific explanations.

"Ros, ris, fakta og noen synspunkter" (Praise, criticism, facts, and some viewpoints) - Response by Bernt Smedvig

Bernt Smedvig responds to a letter (likely from Odd-Gunnar Røed, though not explicitly stated here) that criticizes UFO-NORGE's approach. Smedvig defends the magazine's use of the term "UFO" as representing an unknown phenomenon, contrasting it with "IFO" (Identified Flying Object). He argues that the magazine's attempt to find natural explanations is valid, and when unsuccessful, the phenomenon is correctly classified as UFO. Smedvig expresses anticipation for future discoveries that might explain these phenomena, regardless of their origin (extraterrestrial, interdimensional, temporal, psychological, or natural). He agrees with the criticism of scientists Erik Tandberg and Kaare Aksnes, but cautions against using overly harsh language, stating they are not unintelligent but may have limited perspectives.

UFO-NORGE i "forandring" (UFO-NORGE in "change") - Response by Odd-Gunnar Røed

Odd-Gunnar Røed responds to Hans Ragnar Norli's critique of UFO-NORGE. Røed defends the magazine's approach, stating that while it may seem narrowly scientific, it cannot be contradicted. He criticizes Norli's belief in the spaceship theory as being as unprovable as believing in Santa Claus. Røed argues that the magazine's approach is objective and that the witnesses' claims are not necessarily more credible than natural explanations. He dismisses the idea that advanced civilizations could easily reach Earth, citing vast distances. Røed also defends the magazine's handling of the "Roswell Footage" offer, stating that the disclaimers are necessary due to the unverified nature of the material. He questions Norli's criticism of the magazine's handling of specific reports, suggesting that Norli may be misinterpreting the information or has an agenda.

"Slutt med penger fra Bigelow" (End of money from Bigelow)

This news brief reports that the Bigelow Foundation has ended its funding for American UFO research organizations (CUFOS, MUFON, and FUFOR). Initially, Bigelow provided funds with the condition that the organizations agree on projects. However, Bigelow sought more influence and veto power in the second year, wanting to investigate controversial topics like crop circles and animal mutilations. The organizations could not agree on the future collaboration, leading to the termination of the funding. The source is cited as CNI News and UFO-NYT nr. 5 1995.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine exhibits a tension between a desire for scientific rigor in UFO research and an openness to unexplained phenomena. UFO-NORGE aims for a neutral, scientific approach, seeking natural explanations first, but acknowledges the existence of phenomena that defy current understanding. There's a clear debate within the letters section regarding the validity of astrology, with strong skeptical viewpoints clashing with those who see value in it. The magazine also addresses controversial topics like alien abductions and the Roswell incident, often with a cautious, evidence-based perspective. The editorial stance emphasizes that until phenomena are proven, they remain in the realm of the unknown (UFOs), and that belief without evidence is insufficient. The magazine also seems to be undergoing internal changes, as indicated by the discussion about UFO-NORGE's organizational structure and the transition from membership to subscription.

This issue of 'UFO' magazine, dated May-November 1995, features a comprehensive report on the Project Hessdalen in Norway, authored by Erling Strand. The magazine delves into the history, research, and ongoing efforts to understand the mysterious light phenomena observed in the Hessdalen region.

Project Hessdalen: An Overview

Erling Strand, a lecturer at Høgskolen i Østfold (HiØ), provides a detailed summary of Project Hessdalen, which began in 1983. The project was initiated by Strand and other UFO investigators to study the 'unknown light sources' commonly seen in Hessdalen since December 1981. While activity has decreased in recent years, sporadic reports still come in. The phenomena, often referred to as UFOs, have been scientifically termed 'Hessdalen Phenomena' (H.P.) by researchers. Despite extensive observation, no definitive explanation has yet been found.

Field Expeditions and Instrumentation

Project Hessdalen organized two major field expeditions in Hessdalen during the winters of 1984 and 1985. These expeditions involved numerous instruments to measure the phenomena, including cameras, IR-viewers, spectrum analyzers, magnetometers, radar, Geiger counters, and seismographs. The goal was to gather empirical data to support or refute various hypotheses. A report detailing the findings of these expeditions was published in 1985.

International Collaboration and Seminars

An international working seminar, 'First International Workshop on the Unidentified Atmospheric Light Phenomena in Hessdalen,' was held in March 1994, bringing together 27 scientists from eight countries. The proceedings of this seminar are set to be published. Future plans include establishing an automatic monitoring station in Hessdalen to continuously record any anomalies. Several scientists from universities worldwide, including a Nobel Prize candidate, have expressed interest in participating.

Background of the Hessdalen Phenomenon

The Hessdalen Phenomena are typically observed as bright light sources that can illuminate the surroundings. Their size can range from one centimeter to several meters in diameter, with varying shapes, often elliptical or spherical. The duration of these phenomena can range from a fraction of a second to several hours. They have been observed to hover stationary for minutes before moving slowly or rapidly, with radar measurements indicating speeds of up to 30,000 km/h. The phenomena have been observed near the ground, allowing landscape features to be seen in the background.

Global Presence and Characteristics

'Hessdalen Phenomena' are reported globally, often appearing as bright lights in specific 'window areas.' Hessdalen experienced a prolonged period of frequent observations from December 1981 to 1985, with up to two sightings per day or 7-8 per week at its peak. While still observed, the frequency has decreased. The phenomena can emit light for extended periods, making them difficult to explain. Physicists have numerous theories about their origin, but none are universally accepted.

Previous Investigations and Information Dissemination

Previous research has been hampered by a lack of on-site instrumental measurements due to the transient nature of the phenomena. Project Hessdalen's efforts, starting with a project plan developed in 1983 with input from the Norwegian Defence Research Establishment (FFI) and the University of Bergen (UiB), aimed to address this. The project has actively disseminated information through lectures, articles in various media, and presentations at international conferences. Notable conferences where the project was presented include those in Budapest, Moscow, Salzburg, Glasgow, and Lyon.

The CRULP Initiative and Future Directions

The 'Center for Research on Unknown Atmospheric Light Phenomena' (CRULP) was formed at Østfold Ingeniørhøgskole (now Høgskolen i Østfold - HiØ) in November 1993. CRULP is working on a new project to instrumentally register the phenomena in their natural environment. This project aims to provide the necessary data to understand the phenomenon. The project will involve building a mobile automatic monitoring station. Collaborations are being established with researchers globally, including potential work with Dr. Stelio Montebugnoli from Italy on electromagnetic radiation.

UFO-Phenomenon and Technology by Stein Jarving

This section offers speculative insights into UFO phenomena and their potential technological implications. The author, Stein Jarving, suggests that while extraterrestrial contact is controversial, it warrants consideration. He discusses the physical characteristics of alleged alien beings and their craft, proposing that their physiology might be adapted to lower gravity and dimmer light. He speculates on advanced technologies, such as gravity manipulation and sophisticated sensor implants, potentially indicating a technological level far beyond current human capabilities.

Jarving also touches upon the 'lost time' phenomenon reported in abduction cases, questioning the rationality behind such encounters. He posits that extraterrestrial intelligence might operate on principles fundamentally different from human logic and ethics, possibly viewing humanity as a potential threat.

Rauni-Leena Luukanen: A Debunking

Ole Jonny Brænne critically examines the claims of Rauni-Leena Luukanen, a figure in the UFO community. Brænne debunks several of Luukanen's assertions, including her claimed academic titles, her use of 'automatic writing' for her books, and her pronouncements about extraterrestrial intentions. He questions her claims of contact with extraterrestrials and her interpretations of UFO phenomena, suggesting that her information is often based on rumors and misinformation rather than verifiable evidence.

Press Clippings and Media Coverage

The magazine includes a section of press clippings from May to November 1995, detailing various media reports on UFO phenomena in Norway. These include articles on the Roswell film, crop circles, and numerous UFO sightings reported by newspapers and magazines across the country. The coverage ranges from serious investigative pieces to more skeptical or dismissive accounts.

Notable Figures and Events

The issue mentions the passing of Leonard H. Stringfield, a prominent UFO researcher and journalist, in December 1994. Stringfield was known for his work on UFO crash retrievals and his extensive investigations into UFO sightings.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently focuses on the scientific investigation of UFO phenomena, particularly the Hessdalen Phenomenon. There is a clear emphasis on empirical data, instrumentation, and rational analysis, distinguishing it from more speculative or sensationalist UFO reporting. The editorial stance appears to be one of open-minded skepticism, encouraging rigorous research while debunking unsubstantiated claims, as seen in the critique of Rauni-Leena Luukanen's assertions. The magazine also highlights the international nature of UFO research and the growing interest from the scientific community.

This issue of UFO 3-4/95, dated July 13, 1995, is a Norwegian publication focusing on UFO phenomena, paranormal events, and related topics. It features a prominent cover story about a Widerøe pilot's UFO alarm.

Cover Story: "HADDE INGEN VINGER" (Had No Wings)

The main headline on the cover, "HADDE INGEN VINGER," is accompanied by a striking image and the sub-headline "Widerøe-pilot i 15 000 fot slo UFO-alarm" (Widerøe pilot at 15,000 feet sounded UFO alarm). The article, written by Anders E. Topper, details an encounter on July 13, 1995, where a Widerøe flight en route from Fornebu to Brønnøysund, eight miles north of Trondheim near Steinkjer, was approached by an unknown flying object. Captain Erik P. Risan described the object as having no wings or tail, moving at 15,000 feet. The object eventually slowed down and disappeared. The pilots reported the sighting to Værnes air traffic control. The Norwegian Armed Forces' radar station at Gråkallen in Trondheim did not detect any unusual signals, and no military aircraft were reported in the area. The article notes that the co-pilot was reluctant to provide further details to the press.

"X-files" Series and UFO Reports

The magazine features a continuation of a series on UFOs and paranormal phenomena, referencing the popular American TV show "X-files." Willy Ustad, an author and former officer, discusses the Roswell incident, suggesting it might be real and that political, psychological, and religious motives could be behind the secrecy. He is preparing a new book on the topic.

Notable Sightings and Cases

Several other UFO sightings and cases are detailed:

• Hjørdis Hokstad's Observation (July 25, 1981): Hokstad reported seeing a cigar-shaped object and a short, hooded humanoid figure near a field. The object then took off rapidly.
• Mosjøen Case (August 1954): Two sisters claimed to have encountered a man and a flying saucer.
• Reinsnos Encounter (Autumn 1992): An observation of a landed object and two humanoids was reported near Odda.
• Ester Wilberg's Photo (Easter 1953): A woman from Oslo photographed a round, reddish object in Hemsedal.
• Sunnmøre Daylight Sighting (September 1968): A father and son observed an object or "craft" estimated to be 35-40 meters long.
• Østlandet Light Phenomena (July 14, 1995): Reports of strange light spheres moving at high speed over the Oslofjord area.
• Finnmark Photo (July 15, 1995): A landscape photo taken by Kjell Ivar Simensen captured an unclear spot in the sky.
• Madaltua Sighting (August 18, 1995): A cylindrical object with no wings was filmed near Stavanger.
• Evje Sighting (July 20, 1995): A large, silver-white cigar-shaped object without wings was observed hovering.

UFO-Norge and Investigations

The magazine highlights the work of UFO-Norge, an organization that receives and investigates UFO reports. Ole Jonny Brænne of UFO-Norge explains their process, which involves checking for conventional explanations like aircraft, weather balloons, or atmospheric phenomena. They archive cases that remain unexplained. The article mentions that UFO-Norge has around 900 subscribers and has been active since 1981. They also investigate alleged landing sites, collecting soil, water, and snow samples.

Skepticism and Alternative Explanations

While reporting on sightings, the magazine also includes skeptical viewpoints and alternative explanations. For instance, a sighting of crop circles discovered near Raufoss and Ringerike was attributed to a hoax by two individuals inspired by a TV program. The magazine also discusses the Roswell film, with various experts expressing skepticism about its authenticity, with some calling it a "thin UFO soup" or a "hoax."

Astronomy Section

A regular astronomy column by Jan Qvam provides an update on celestial events. This section covers the winter sky, including constellations like Orion, Gemini, and Ursa Major, as well as prominent stars like Sirius, Aldebaran, and Betelgeuse. It also details open star clusters such as M35, M37, M36, M38, and the Double Cluster in Perseus, and mentions the Pleiades (M45) and the Orion Nebula (M42). The Milky Way galaxy and the Andromeda galaxy (M31) are also discussed. The column touches upon meteor showers, specifically the Geminids, and the visibility of planets like Venus and Saturn.

Kolbjørn Stenødegård Obituary

The issue includes an obituary for Kolbjørn Stenødegård, described as a pioneer of Norwegian ufology. He founded Norsk UFO Center (NUFOC) in 1973, which later evolved into UFO-Norge. The article notes his controversial nature and his eventual shift towards skepticism, founding the Norsk institutt for vitenskapelig forskning og opplysning (NIVFO).

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are UFO sightings, investigations, and the ongoing debate about their nature and origin. The magazine presents a range of perspectives, from eyewitness accounts and researcher interviews to skeptical analyses and astronomical explanations. There's a clear interest in the "X-files" phenomenon and the Roswell incident, reflecting a broader cultural fascination with UFOs. The editorial stance appears to be one of open inquiry, presenting various viewpoints without necessarily endorsing any single theory, while also acknowledging the possibility of hoaxes and misidentifications. The inclusion of an astronomy section suggests an effort to provide a scientific context for celestial observations.

This issue of UFO magazine, identified as UFO 3-4/95, is published by UFO-NORGE and features a cover headline about t-shirts. The issue delves into various aspects of the UFO phenomenon, including historical accounts, modern sightings, and theoretical discussions.

Video and Book Offerings

The magazine promotes a video about Area 51 in Nevada, USA, speculating about American test flights of alien craft. The film, released in 1995, is two hours and 15 minutes long and costs 300 kr. plus shipping. Additionally, a book by Philip Mantle and Carl Nagaitis is offered, detailing close encounters of the 4th kind with lost time. The book is described as easy to read, 204 pages long, and priced at 185 kr. plus postage.

T-shirts for Sale

UFO-NORGE is also selling t-shirts for 85 kr. plus postage. These shirts are white with orange text and an emblem. Ordering information, including a Postboks address and phone/fax numbers, is provided. Readers are encouraged to use the postal giro for payment.

Historical Accounts of Ball Lightning and Light Phenomena

An article by Odd-Gunnar Røed, titled "ÅRGANGS-UFO," explores historical accounts of ball lightning and other light phenomena. It references a 1902 article from 'Kringsjå' discussing 'lantern men' and 'ball lightning,' noting the early recognition of exotic electrical energy forms. A detailed account from 1886 in Würtemberg describes a farmer witnessing a triangular light, blue at the bottom and red at the top, moving erratically and hovering over an apple tree. The article compares these phenomena to lightning, noting differences in behavior and occurrence. It also includes an account of a ball lightning event near Darmstadt in 1902, which caused destruction.

Modern Ball Lightning and UFO Encounters

The article continues with a modern account from Feda, Norway, where a small, red ball of light entered a house, interacted with a TV screen, and disappeared. This event is presented as a 'modern ball lightning' phenomenon. The author, Odd-Gunnar Røed, also discusses the significance of ice caps in Norway, Iceland, and Spitsbergen in relation to climate change.

The Roswell Film Debate

A significant portion of the magazine is dedicated to the Roswell incident and a film about it, which was discussed on the TV program 'Holmgang.' UFO-NORGE representative Odd-Gunnar Røed presented the organization's view, emphasizing that the film contributed to the discussion and that no decisive evidence against its authenticity had emerged. Erik Tunstad, a journalist from Skepsis, expressed skepticism, questioning the film's credibility and evolutionary biology arguments. Author Willy Ustad, who had researched the Roswell case extensively, also voiced doubts about the film's authenticity. Professor Kåre Aksnes of the University of Oslo cited the US Air Force report, attributing the incident to the secret Project Mogul. Erik Tandberg dismissed the Roswell case and film as "pure nonsense," arguing that no physical evidence of extraterrestrial origin had ever been presented. The program also featured three individuals sharing their UFO experiences. The debate, moderated by Nils Gunnar Lie, was perceived by some participants as favoring the skeptics due to time constraints.

Close Encounters of the 4th Kind

Leslie Bjørkelund writes about 'Close Encounters of the 4th Kind,' defining them as human contact with extraterrestrial humanoids, often involving abduction or examination, and frequently accompanied by memory loss. He notes that many witnesses remain anonymous due to the sensitive nature of these experiences. Bjørkelund references the book 'Without Consent' by Carl Nigaitis and Philip Mantle as a resource for detailed case studies. He discusses the challenges in seriously addressing these accounts due to sensationalism and speculation. The article touches upon historical parallels, such as ancient myths of contact with gods and extraterrestrial beings like those from Sirius, and the influence of Theosophy and occultism on modern UFO beliefs.

The Ringkollen Incident

Another article by Odd-Gunnar Røed details a personal account from Finn C., who experienced a close encounter at Ringkollen, Norway, in October 1985. During a hypnotic regression, Finn C. described a humming sound, a light, and the presence of two beings. He reported intense pain followed by a feeling of love, and a telepathic message about beings from the "sixth universe." The incident involved a craft hovering nearby and his girlfriend being brought aboard. The article also touches upon the psychological impact of such experiences and the potential for misinterpretation during hypnosis.

Analysis of UFO Photographs

Odd-Gunnar Røed also analyzes several photographs presented in the magazine. One photo, reportedly showing an 'A' moving in front of a curtain, was examined by a photo expert who requested the negative for further analysis. Another image, taken from a flight over Bergen, shows rings around two points above the clouds, with the expert suggesting it could be a hoax involving a smoke machine. A third image is tentatively explained as a dust particle or drop on the photographic paper during development. The author stresses the importance of examining negatives to determine the authenticity of such images.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently explores UFO phenomena, close encounters, and related mysteries. There's a strong emphasis on presenting witness accounts, historical research, and critical analysis. UFO-NORGE appears to be a central organization promoting discussion and investigation within Norway. The editorial stance seems to encourage open debate and the sharing of experiences, while also acknowledging the challenges of distinguishing genuine phenomena from hoaxes, psychological factors, and sensationalism. The magazine promotes its own publications and merchandise, aiming to engage readers in the ongoing exploration of the UFO topic.

This issue of UFO-NORGE, identified as 'B-BLAD' and dated December 10, 1995, focuses on providing readers with access to the magazine's archives and special thematic publications. The cover prominently displays a list of available back issues from 1982 to 1994, detailing the number of issues per year, the price per copy (in A4 format), and the total cost. It also outlines shipping costs based on weight and mentions that original magazines are available at a slightly lower price while stocks last. The issue also announces five 'TEMAHEFTER' (Thematic Issues) that have been compiled into a single A4 booklet.

Thematic Issues (TEMAHEFTER)

The magazine details five special thematic issues:

1. 1989: Nikola Tesla by Per Ottesen: Explores Tesla, the 'father of alternating current,' and his work, suggesting he was misunderstood and that his inventions, including wireless electricity, were open to the UFO phenomenon.
2. 1991: Spitsbergen by Ole Jonny Brænne: Investigates the alleged crash of a 'flying saucer' on Svalbard, compiling over 40 years of speculation and providing a conclusion.
3. 1992: Near-contact with belief by Torfrid Urdal: Examines the connection between interest in UFOs and religious belief, reviewing theories and scrutinizing 'preachers' in a section titled 'Racism in new disguise?'
4. 1993: UFO observations in Norway 1536-1946 by Ole Jonny Brænne: Presents a comprehensive overview of UFO sightings in Norway over 383 years, including the mysterious ghost rockets and planes over Scandinavia before and after World War II.
5. 1994: Norwegian near-contacts of the 3rd kind by Odd-Gunnar Røed: A collection of known third-degree encounters in Norway as documented by UFO-NORGE, offering historical context and insights into proposed theories for the UFO phenomenon.

The collected thematic issue is priced at 165 NOK, with individual issues also available at varying prices (35-40 NOK). All orders are subject to additional postage and potential cash-on-delivery fees.

Editorial and Submission Guidelines

The 'TING Å MERKE SEG' (Things to Note) section outlines the editorial policy for submissions. UFO-NORGE welcomes articles and contributions, requesting that manuscripts be typewritten with double line spacing and accompanied by good quality black and white illustrations. Specific placement instructions for illustrations and captions are required. The magazine reserves the right to edit or shorten submissions. For technical submissions, articles and images can be provided on 3.5 or 5.25-inch diskettes (720 kB/1.44 MB or 360/1.2 MB DOS formats), preferably in WordPerfect version 4.2 or later. Readers are also encouraged to send clippings from Norwegian or international publications that might be of interest. Those willing to translate articles from other languages are asked to contact the editor.

Membership and Support

The magazine encourages readers to help promote UFO-NORGE by sharing its information folder and recruiting new members. A special incentive is offered: new members who recruit five or more subscribers receive a free subscription. A 'STØTTEFOND FOR UFO-NORGE' (Support Fund for UFO-NORGE) is also highlighted, appealing for financial contributions to help the organization cover its expenses and undertake various tasks that are currently postponed due to lack of funds. Donations can be made to postgiro number 08 09 3 07 08 10, with the reference 'STØTTEFONDET'.

Contact Information

Contact details for UFO-NORGE are provided, with the main address being Rygg, 4448 Gyland. Readers can request information folders from this address. A separate address for the support fund is listed as UFO-NORGE, Postboks 1155, 5001 Bergen.

Cover Images

The back cover features three images with accompanying questions:

• An image of a person looking at a computer screen, with the question: "What is moving in front of the camera lens?"
• An aerial view of clouds with two faint objects visible, asking: "What is sticking up through the cloud layer?"
• A landscape photo of a lake and trees, with the question: "And what on earth has the photographer captured here?"

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the accessibility of UFO-related information through back issues and specialized thematic publications. UFO-NORGE positions itself as a central repository and disseminator of UFO knowledge in Norway, covering historical sightings, alleged encounters, and theoretical discussions. The editorial stance appears to be one of active research, compilation, and promotion of the UFO phenomenon, encouraging both reader participation through submissions and financial support. The emphasis on historical data, detailed case studies, and the compilation of information suggests a commitment to documenting and analyzing UFO reports within Norway and internationally.