AI Magazine Summary
UFO - 1991 No 1
AI-Generated Summary
This issue of UFO Magazine, Volume 10, Issue 1/91, published by UFO-NORGE, focuses on a series of UFO sightings that occurred in the Trengereid area of Norway between January 16 and February 10, 1991. The cover headline, "Såg UFO på Trengereid" (Saw UFO at Trengereid), and the…
Magazine Overview
This issue of UFO Magazine, Volume 10, Issue 1/91, published by UFO-NORGE, focuses on a series of UFO sightings that occurred in the Trengereid area of Norway between January 16 and February 10, 1991. The cover headline, "Såg UFO på Trengereid" (Saw UFO at Trengereid), and the sub-headline, "Stor UFO-interesse" (Great UFO interest), highlight the significance of these events.
UFO Over Trengereid
The main article, "UFO OVER TRENGEREID" by Mentz Kaarbø, details the events that unfolded in the small village of Trengereid near Bergen. In a three-week period starting mid-January 1991, between 20 and 30 observations were reported. While many sightings were attributed to aircraft, a handful of reports remained difficult to explain. The phenomena, described as round or oval luminous objects with blinking white lights moving low over the fjord, attracted considerable media attention from local newspapers and NRK.
Introduction to the Trengereid Phenomenon
The article notes that the sightings were concentrated in the areas around Trengereid and Vaksdal, as well as Osterøy. During the last week of the observation period (February 3-10), newspapers and NRK showed increasing interest, making the phenomenon known nationwide. The location, Trengereid, is described as a small village situated on a steep, west-facing slope with a good view towards the west over Sørfjorden. The fjord is about 1-1.5 km wide, and the surrounding mountains reach heights of 400-700 meters.
Inge Skulstad's Observations
Inge Skulstad, a local resident, reported the first significant sighting on the evening of Wednesday, January 16. He described a "flying object" with 15-20 blinking lights and two red lights on each side. The object maneuvered and hovered silently for about four minutes before moving behind Trengereidhatten. Skulstad observed the object again later that night and the following night. He noted that his television reception was poor during the first sighting. His report led to contact with local authorities and Flesland airport, who found no record of unusual activity.
Other Eyewitness Accounts
Sigmund Høyseter from Arnatveit reported a UFO on Sunday, February 3, near Vaksdal. He described it as moving at high speed, stopping, and then emitting small cylindrical light projectiles. He was certain it was not an aircraft or the planet Venus.
Vidar Gjøsund, along with his wife, observed a large, silent object with four square yellow and green blinking lights on Wednesday, February 6, around 11:07 PM. They saw a black circle behind the lights, suggesting a large craft. The object passed over their house at a considerable height.
NRK cameraman Terje Dahle also witnessed an object on Monday, February 4, around 9:40 PM. He described it as dome-shaped on top with two bubbles underneath, and two parallel lights that shifted color from blue to orange. He noted its high speed and a maneuver before it disappeared.
Media Coverage
The sightings generated extensive media coverage. Bygdanytt was the first local newspaper to report on Inge Skulstad's observation on January 25. This was followed by articles in Bergens Arbeiderblad, Dagbladet, and Verdens Gang. Bergens Arbeiderblad featured a front-page color photograph of the phenomenon taken by Johannes Rolland on February 4. The newspaper published detailed reports and interviews with witnesses.
Alternative Explanations
Flygeleder Knut Johan Mohn from Flesland airport proposed that the sightings were due to misinterpretations of SAS flight SK 339, which arrived from Oslo around 11:15 PM. He explained that under certain atmospheric conditions, aircraft could appear to be stationary or in unusual positions. He also mentioned that the planet Venus was visible and could be mistaken for a UFO.
Rejection of Alternative Explanations
The witnesses and UFO-Norge largely rejected Mohn's explanation. They argued that the observed phenomena, particularly their duration, silence, and specific movements, could not be attributed to conventional aircraft or atmospheric effects like light reflections. They emphasized that they were familiar with aircraft and could distinguish them from the observed objects.
UFO-Norge's Work
Finn Kalvik, representing UFO-Norge, visited Trengereid to gather eyewitness accounts and distribute report forms. He reviewed drawings, photographs, and a video of the phenomenon. UFO-Norge conducted observational tours of the area but found no further unexplained phenomena, only aircraft. The organization maintains that while some sightings might be explainable, a core group of observations remain unidentified.
Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance
The magazine strongly supports the eyewitness accounts, presenting them as credible evidence of UFOs. The editorial stance is clearly in favor of the reality of UFO phenomena, challenging official explanations and encouraging further investigation. The recurring theme is the persistent mystery of unexplained aerial phenomena and the public's fascination with them, contrasted with the skepticism of authorities and conventional explanations.
Key Facts Synopsis
This issue details a significant wave of UFO sightings in Trengereid, Norway, in early 1991. Eyewitnesses reported various luminous objects, some exhibiting unusual maneuvers and characteristics. The events garnered substantial media attention, leading to an investigation by UFO-Norge. While official explanations involving aircraft and atmospheric conditions were proposed, witnesses and the organization largely dismissed them, asserting that the observed phenomena were genuinely unidentified. Evidence collected included testimonies, photographs, and video footage.
Notable Quote
"Ikke tale om, det var UFO vi så!" (No way, it was a UFO we saw!)
FAQ
- What was the main UFO event covered in this issue? The main event is a series of UFO sightings over Trengereid, Norway, from January 16 to February 10, 1991, which attracted significant local and national media attention.
- Who is UFO-Norge and what is their role? UFO-Norge is a nationwide organization that independently works with registering and studying the UFO phenomenon, providing information to members and the public.
- What alternative explanations were proposed for the Trengereid sightings? Flygeleder Knut Johan Mohn suggested that the sightings were misinterpretations of incoming flights, specifically SAS flight SK 339 from Oslo to Bergen, and atmospheric phenomena like light reflections.
- Did the witnesses accept the alternative explanations? No, the UFO observers and UFO-Norge largely rejected the explanations, stating that the observed phenomena could not be explained by conventional aircraft or atmospheric conditions.
- What kind of evidence was collected? Evidence included eyewitness testimonies, drawings, photographs, and a video of the phenomenon.
Title: UFO 1/91
Issue Date: January 1991
Publisher: UFO-Norge
Country: Norway
Language: Norwegian
ISSN: 0800-2872
Report on UFO Sightings in Norway (January-March 1991)
This section provides a detailed overview of UFO sightings reported across Norway during the first quarter of 1991. The magazine highlights several key locations and incidents:
Masfjorden Incident (March 1, 1991)
On Saturday, March 3rd, reports emerged of a luminous phenomenon observed in the outer parts of Masfjorden on Friday, March 1st. Several named witnesses described a luminous sphere with a V-shaped symbol moving from west to east for 10-15 minutes around 8:00 AM. The object was seen over Risnes, approximately 10 km northwest of the Masfjorden inlet. Two women had also observed a similar phenomenon on Thursday, February 28th, around 8:30 AM, which remained stationary for a considerable time before disappearing behind a nearby mountain. The witnesses were adamant that the sightings were not of aircraft or helicopters. Masfjorden is located about 50 km north-northwest of Trengereid.
Conclusion on Trengereid Sightings
Despite numerous reports from Trengereid, only 6-7 were deemed difficult to explain as conventional aircraft, sun dogs, or similar phenomena. These included observations by Inge Skulstad, the Gjøsund couple, Sigmund Høyseter, NRK photographer Terje Dahle, and Johannes Rolland. The magazine suggests these observations, if taken literally, are of high significance. Few reports were received after February 10th, indicating a potential decline in activity, with the exception of Masfjorden. Due to negative results from their own investigations and the overall trend, UFO-Norge decided against establishing a permanent observation post in Trengereid, similar to the Hessdalen setup. They stated they would reassess the situation if sightings increased in the spring and would report on it in a future issue. UFO-Norge is also seeking more witnesses for phenomena in the Trengereid/Osterfjord area from January/February or later.
Report Overview and Table of Sightings
The magazine presents a table summarizing key observations from January 1st to March 31st, 1991:
- January 10, 1991: Kabelvåg - A large object with 40 blinking white lights and 25-30 red lights, described as dark and distinct against the background. The witness was a trained pilot.
- February 4, 1991: Dalekvam - A large light with a tail moving northwest.
- February 5, 1991: Høybråten, Oslo - A strongly luminous, stationary object.
- February 5, 1991: Ellingsrud, Oslo - A strong, stationary light observed for two hours.
- February 6, 1991: Dalekvam - A large light with a tail.
- February 8, 1991: Dalekvam - A large light with a tail.
- March 22, 1991: Stavanger - An object with two small, luminous, cigar-shaped entities.
- March 24-28, 1991: Bjåen, Haukeli - A luminous object with landing traces observed over four evenings.
- March 26, 1991: Tønsberg - A 'swinging' object with lights.
Detailed Sightings Reports:
- Osterøy (February 4, 1991): Johannes Rolland and Sølvi Irene Hagebø observed an object with red, green, and white lights hovering over Herland, Bergen. It moved towards Blom in Osterøy, stopped for 30 seconds, then moved again before stopping about 300-400 meters from the observers. No sound was heard. Rolland took two photos. The object was described as a belt of red lights with larger white/green lights above and a white light below a hemisphere. Aviation authorities confirmed no aircraft were in the area.
- Dalekvam (February 1991): Geir Karstensen reported three sightings. On February 4th and 6th, he saw a large light with a tail moving northwest. On February 8th, using binoculars, he observed an object with a bright central light and smaller lights around it, emitting a 'tail' of light. Three other witnesses saw this.
- Oslo (February 5, 1991): Inger Marie Hageli and her son observed a bright light hanging low over Trondhjemsveien. Initially thought to be an aircraft, it moved closer and appeared as a mass of strong white lights at two levels. Through binoculars, only one strong light was visible. The object moved towards them, appearing as a triangle with lights on its sides when about 300-400 meters away. It then ascended rapidly and disappeared. A faint humming sound was heard during ascent. The witness noted its low altitude and unusual movement compared to known aircraft.
- Oslo (February 5, 1991): Vilgunn Mikkelsen reported two sightings. At 5:15 PM, she observed a strong luminous object, like a spotlight, moving slowly and disappearing behind a building. Later, from 7:15 PM for two hours, she saw a strong light, larger than a star, near Ellingsrud.
- Stavanger (March 22, 1991): Andrew J. Bevan, an experienced amateur astronomer, observed an object moving east at about 45 degrees above the horizon. It was faster than a satellite and brighter. He described it as cigar-shaped with a slight tilt, not flying straight. He also saw two smaller, cigar-shaped objects moving independently at low altitude, performing rapid maneuvers. Bevan stated these phenomena did not match anything he had observed before.
- Bjåen - Haukeli (March 24-28, 1991): A strong luminous phenomenon was observed over several evenings, with a possible landing and distinct tracks in the snow. The tracks were photographed, and snow samples were collected. UFO-Norge sent representatives to interview witnesses and collect evidence.
- Tønsberg (March 26, 1991): Multiple people independently observed an object with four sharp lights and a weaker, swinging light. Local media covered the event, and investigations by UFO-Norge indicated no air traffic or radar anomalies at the time.
The MJ-12 Case: Evidence of UFO Cover-up? (Part 2)
This article by Flemming Rasmussen continues the investigation into the alleged 'Majestic-12' (MJ-12) documents, a purported highly secret intelligence service created by the US government shortly after World War II.
The Documents Emerge
The article references scandals like Watergate and Irangate, noting that skilled journalists uncovered them. It questions why these documents are relevant to a UFO magazine, explaining that some documents were central to those scandals. The MJ-12 documents, allegedly found by Jaime Shandera, a previously unknown figure in UFO circles, raise questions about their origin and transmission.
The Documents in Question:
1. TOP SECRET Memorandum (September 24, 1947): From President Truman to Secretary of Defense James Forrestal, recommending the establishment of 'Operation Majestic-12' under Dr. Vannevar Bush. The operation was to investigate the wreckage of a crashed UFO and four deceased alien occupants.
2. TOP SECRET EYES ONLY Document (November 18, 1952): A six-page document where Rear Admiral Roscoe H. Hillenkoetter briefs the newly elected President Dwight D. Eisenhower on Majestic-12, crashed UFOs, and other related information.
3. TOP SECRET Memorandum (July 14, 1954): From President's Special Assistant Robert Cutlar to General Nathan Twining, USAF Chief of Staff, concerning a meeting of the MJ-12 group.
The first two documents were part of the film received by Shandera in December 1984. The third was later found in the National Archives.
President Harry S. Truman's Letter
The letter dated September 24, 1947, from Truman to Forrestal, appears to authorize the creation of a secret organization named MJ-12. However, the article raises doubts about its authenticity. While the signature seems genuine, the handwriting style differs from Truman's known correspondence. Crucially, the letter is not found in the Truman Library archives. The article notes that 'Executive Orders' from around that date are numbered sequentially from 9.891 to 9.896, whereas this document is designated 'Attachment A' and 'executive order' No. 092447, which seems inconsistent.
Hillenkoetter/Eisenhower Document
This document, dated November 18, 1952, is presented as a briefing for President Eisenhower. It describes 'Operation Majestic-12' as a highly secret investigation/intelligence organization reporting directly to the President. The group was established by President Truman on September 24, 1947, based on recommendations from Dr. Vannevar Bush and Minister James Forrestal. The document lists the members of the MJ-12 group, including Adm. Roscoe H. Hillenkoetter, Dr. Vannevar Bush, Min. James V. Forrestal, Gen. Nathan F. Twining, Gen. Hoyt S. Vandenberg, Dr. Detlev Bronk, Dr. Jerome Hunsaker, Mr. Sidney W. Souers, Mr. Gordon Grey, Dr. Donald Menzel, Gen. Robert M. Montague, and Dr. Lloyd V. Berkner. It notes that a position became vacant after Minister Forrestal's death in May 1949 and was filled by Gen. Walter B. Smith on August 1, 1950.
Analysis of the Roswell Incident (1947)
The article details the events surrounding the alleged crash of a UFO near Roswell, New Mexico, in June 1947. A pilot reported seeing nine disc-shaped aircraft. Following this, a local farmer reported a crash. A secret organization was formed to investigate the wreckage, discovering four small, deceased, non-human beings. The wreckage was moved, and a cover story about a weather balloon was issued to the media. A secret analysis by Gen. Twining and Dr. Bush in September 1947 concluded the disc was likely a reconnaissance craft. Dr. Bronk's examination of the deceased beings suggested they were biologically and evolutionarily different from humans, proposing the term 'Extra-terrestrial biological entities' (EBEs).
The Hillenkoetter/Eisenhower Document's Implication
The Hillenkoetter/Eisenhower document suggests that Eisenhower was unaware of the Roswell incident, which contradicts other accounts. The article implies that army officers investigated the crash and transported the UFO. The document itself was allegedly stamped TOP SECRET, EYES ONLY, and COPY ONE OF ONE. Some parts were initially redacted but later disappeared.
Landing at Haukelifjell
This article by Odd-Gunnar Røed and Torfrid Urdal details an investigation into a reported landing at Haukelifjell in April 1991.
Investigation Details
On Monday, April 8th, UFO-Norge received a report of unexplained lights observed near a lake on Haukelifjell during Easter. The UFO reportedly landed twice, leaving distinct tracks in the snow on the last occasion. The witnesses had taken photographs of the tracks. Despite the incident occurring 10-11 days prior, UFO-Norge dispatched a team. They gathered equipment and contacted witnesses. A local resident, a road maintenance supervisor, provided access to the observation site via snowmobile. The landowner also confirmed seeing the tracks and provided a sketch.
Findings at the Site
Due to several snowfalls and subsequent melting since Easter, only discolored patches of yellowish-brown snow were found, matching witness descriptions. Samples were taken from the presumed center of the tracks and 15 meters away. pH measurements at both locations were normal (7). A Geiger counter showed no radioactivity. The landscape was noted to be similar to Hessdalen, with similar mountain formations. A disused molybdenum mine was nearby.
Analysis and Future Reporting
Snow samples were sent for analysis, and reports from witnesses were awaited. The article mentions seeing clear photographs of the tracks, which were circular with a spiral pattern leading to the center, measuring 50-60 cm in diameter. Three visible tracks were reported, possibly with a fourth in the water. The distance between each 'footprint' was three meters. The snow was discolored. UFO-Norge promised a full report in a later issue once all data was collected.
Have You Got Your Insurance in Order?
This short piece discusses the concept of 'Close Encounter Insurance' offered by the 'Fair-Witness Project' (William Moore). For an annual fee of $9.95, one could get $10 million in insurance against being abducted by aliens. The article humorously points out the difficulty of providing valid proof of abduction, noting that one of the insurance conditions is a sworn affidavit from the alien responsible for the abduction.
Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance
The magazine consistently focuses on UFO sightings and investigations, with a particular emphasis on detailed witness accounts and photographic evidence. The recurring theme of government secrecy and potential cover-ups, particularly concerning the Majestic-12 documents, is a significant focus. UFO-Norge positions itself as an investigative body seeking to uncover the truth behind unexplained aerial phenomena, while also acknowledging the possibility of misidentifications and natural explanations. The editorial stance appears to be one of open inquiry, encouraging public participation and reporting, while maintaining a critical approach to evidence and documentation.
Title: UFO
Issue: 1/91
Date: January 1991
Country: Norway
Language: Norwegian
This issue of UFO magazine delves into various aspects of UFOlogy, including alleged government cover-ups, close encounters, and advanced technological theories.
Government Projects and Secrecy
The magazine discusses the U.S. Air Force's efforts to investigate UFO phenomena, starting with Project SIGN in December 1947. This project aimed to gather information on these craft, their technical data, and their intentions. For security reasons, the connection between SIGN and a group called Majestic-12 was limited to two individuals from the Air Materiel Command's intelligence service. SIGN evolved into Project GRUDGE in December 1948, which later operated under the codename BLUE BOOK. The article highlights the importance of national security, noting that the visitors' motives and intentions remain unknown. The increasing activity of these craft, starting in May and continuing through the year, is seen as potentially threatening. Therefore, strict security measures are emphasized, including preventing public knowledge of the Majestic-12 group, even as the public is to be informed.
MJ-12-1949-04p/78 is mentioned as a directive that is to continue to be used.
Key UFO Incidents and Observations
Several significant UFO events are mentioned:
- July 9, 1947: General Eisenhower reportedly spent time with Lieutenant General Lavis Norstad and Army Air Forces Chief Hoyt Vandenberg. It is suggested that as Army Chief of Staff, Eisenhower would likely have been briefed on UFO matters.
- July 19-20, 1952: UFO observations near The White House and the Pentagon are noted as being of considerable importance for national security, though they are not detailed in the document.
- July 26-27, 1952: UFOs were detected on radar at Washington National Airport, also considered significant for national security.
- December 6, 1950: A similar object crashed in the El Indio Guerrero area near the Texas-Mexico border. The wreckage was reportedly transported to the Atomic Energy Commission's area at Sandia, New Mexico, for further examination.
- July 21, 1958: Bjarne Finstad and his 12-year-old son observed a flying object near Stange, Norway. The object, initially appearing as a bright star, descended rapidly and split into two cigar-shaped craft. These craft emitted heat and flames from their sides and propelled themselves without conventional means, eventually accelerating away at high speed.
The Roswell Incident and Majestic-12
The article touches upon the Roswell, New Mexico, crash, stating that the wreckage and debris were moved to various locations. It also notes peculiarities in the dating format within the documents, such as an extra comma and a leading zero for single-digit dates, which are also observed in the correspondence of researchers William L. Moore and Philip J. Klass.
The identity of the chairman of Majestic-12 is unknown, but Rear Admiral Roscoe H. Hillenkoetter, the first CIA chief in 1947, is suggested as a possibility, as he provided information to Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1952.
Roscoe H. Hillenkoetter's Involvement
Rear Admiral Roscoe H. Hillenkoetter, who served as the first CIA chief from 1947 to 1950, later joined the National Committee on Aerial Phenomena (NICAP) in 1957, a UFO organization. He publicly stated that unknown objects operated under intelligent control and urged the government to reveal the truth about UFOs. The article questions why a former CIA chief would join such an organization and speculate about his motives, suggesting he might have been compelled to speak out due to his knowledge of government secrets.
Alien Beings and Crashed Craft
A section titled "VAMPYRER FRA DET YTRE ROM?" (Vampires from Outer Space?) presents a photograph of a deceased alien being. The article claims this photo is from a craft that crashed in New Mexico on July 2, 1947. The German newspaper BILD ZEITUNG reported this in August 1990, stating the craft was nine meters in diameter and contained several beings between 60 and 120 cm tall with gray or light brown skin, colorless blood, thin limbs, and four fingers. The bodies were allegedly embalmed and, along with various craft types, are kept at Wright Patterson Air Force Base. The article attributes the story to German author Johannes von Buttlar and Tony Dodd of QUEST International. It also mentions that the U.S. Air Force has knowledge of 23 different species of alien beings, some benevolent and some malevolent, with reports of hostile extraterrestrial encounters involving unexplained deaths and mutilations, particularly around New York, where bodies were drained of blood, suggesting the use of laser-like technology.
The Searl Effect and Flying Saucers
Another article, "SEARL-EFFEKTEN OG FLYGENDE TALLERKENER" (The Searl Effect and Flying Saucers), by Ole Jonny Brænne, discusses John Searl's theories and experiments with flying saucers. Searl, born in 1932, claims to have built his first flying saucer at age 14 in 1946, based on recurring dreams. His theories revolve around the "Searl Effect Generator" (SEG), which uses magnetic rings and rollers. The SEG is described as having an inexhaustible energy source and producing an "antigravitation effect" by manipulating electron flow and creating a vacuum around the craft. Searl's devices allegedly caused local power companies to sue him for non-payment of electricity bills, leading to his imprisonment and the destruction of his equipment. The article details the construction of the SEG, involving layers of electron reservoirs, control gates, accelerators, and emitters. It explains how the interaction of magnetic fields and electron flow generates lift and propulsion. The article also mentions that the craft's steering is achieved by activating emission plates, creating a protective vacuum shield. The author references several books and articles related to Searl's work, including "Ether-Technology" and "The Law Of The Squares."
Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance
The magazine consistently explores themes of government secrecy, advanced extraterrestrial technology, and the potential for antigravity and unlimited energy sources. The editorial stance appears to be one of investigating and presenting information on these topics, often from a perspective that suggests a hidden reality concerning UFOs and their origins, while also acknowledging the need for critical analysis and verification, as seen in the discussion of potential document falsification and the questioning of motives.
This issue of "UFO" magazine, identified as 1/91, is a Norwegian publication from UFO-NORGE, dated January 1991. It covers a range of topics related to unexplained phenomena, including UFO sightings, crop circles, and technological theories.
Articles and Features
Crop Circles: Where Cornfields Bend for UFOs?
This extensive article by Mats Larson, originally from the Swedish newspaper Expressen, delves into the phenomenon of crop circles, which were becoming increasingly common in England prior to the corn harvest. The article notes that these formations, ranging from simple circles to complex symbols, have been reported since the 17th century, with a surge in interest in recent years. Terence Meaden, from the Center for Storm and Tornado Research, theorizes that they are caused by atmospheric phenomena, specifically whirlwinds or balls of air, possibly involving electrical phenomena. He claims to have four witnesses who observed circles being formed, accompanied by humming sounds and a yellow glow.
However, critics question whether whirlwinds can create such perfect and complex geometric patterns. Some suggest they are the work of pranksters. The article highlights the formation at Alton Priors as particularly advanced. Roy Wilding, a guard at a wheat field, describes the phenomenon and the damage it causes to crops. The article mentions that even the military is showing interest, with a TV team conducting a 24-hour surveillance. Jenny Eyre from California is noted to be in the center of a 15-meter diameter circle at Alton Priors.
The article also explores the possibility of extraterrestrial communication, with some interpreting the patterns as a form of 'picture writing' or symbols similar to ancient Indian languages, Sumerian signs, or meteorological symbols. Colin Andrews supports the 'Messages from the Stars' theory. Farmer Tim Carson expresses his hope that if ET is trying to contact them, it will choose a different field next time. The article notes that crop circles have also been reported in Sweden, with former FOA researcher Arne Bergstrøm suggesting they are atmospheric phenomena, but acknowledging that increasingly complex forms might indicate deception or a message.
The Searl Generator
Several figures and diagrams illustrate the Searl generator, described as a device that can be varied in terms of volume distribution to improve its relative efficiency. The article suggests that larger squares make it easier to keep the generator on the ground. Diagrams depict its potential application in flying discs, with electrons flowing in a way that creates a 'skin effect' preventing the disc from moving up or down. Figure 9 illustrates two types of electron flow: centripetal, leading to temperature increase, and centrifugal, leading to temperature decrease.
UFOs in Vanylven?
This section addresses an article from a previous issue about strange tracks discovered in Sunnmøre, Norway. After speaking with Johannes Anonby, the local representative, it is concluded that there is no new information. The tracks are attributed to a snowslide, not a more exotic cause like a UFO. The magazine states that further investigation is not warranted unless new information emerges.
Letters from Readers
Hugo Østmoen writes about a "Project Blue Book" TV program on the Discovery Channel that featured interviews with individuals like Colonel William Coleman, Colonel Bob Friend, Dr. Richard Haines, Captain Neil Daniels, Budd Hopkins, and Bob Barry. The program also touched upon UFO reports from the Soviet Union, Finland, and Iran, and discussed the new openness in the Soviet Union regarding UFO research. The MJ-12 issue and the 'Roswell Incident' were also presented, with Jesse Manel (son of the farmer who found the crashed UFO) being interviewed. The letter notes that skeptics had the last word but were less condescending than usual. The editorial team confirms they recorded the program and agree that more such programs should be broadcast, even on national television (NRK). They also clarify that Jesse Manel likely refers to Jesse Marcel, a Major in the US Air Force involved in the Roswell recovery, and that his son was indeed interviewed.
UFO with Dust on It - From 1895!
This section reprints a text from the newspaper "Fjeld-Ljom" dated July 8, 1895. It describes an event where fishermen near Hesjøen witnessed a luminous object, resembling a "broom," fall vertically. The object was visible from the time it entered the line of sight until it disappeared near the horizon. Despite clear and calm weather, no sound was heard. The distance was estimated at about 1 kilometer. The observer recalled old folk tales about "draksten" (dragon stones).
George Adamski and UFOs
This section discusses the claims of George Adamski, who purported to have had contact with extraterrestrials. The article presents an account from Eric Herr in the MUFON UFO Journal, detailing a conversation with Gene Luther Bloom. Bloom, along with Joseph Maxfield, allegedly met Adamski at a café near Palomar Gardens. According to Bloom, they were not interested in collaborating with Adamski on UFO photography and had only stopped for lunch before heading to the Hale Observatory for unrelated discussions. Bloom states that Adamski's accounts of their involvement were pure fiction.
If You See a UFO - What Do You Do?
This section provides a checklist for UFO observers. It advises noting the time, date, location, course, altitude, size, shape, color, and details of the UFO. Environmental factors like weather, wind, and the position of the sun/moon should be recorded, as well as any other aircraft present. Observers are encouraged to alert others, take photos, and if a landing is observed, to visit the site, look for tracks, photograph them, and secure the area. Reporting the observation to a UFO reporting center or local UFO organization is emphasized, along with a friendly and correct demeanor.
Dansk Institut for Økologisk Teknik
A brief description of the Dansk Institut for Økologisk Teknik (DIFØT) is provided. It is a registered association focused on informing about and developing new technology in harmony with nature, aiming to utilize natural energies with minimal ecological impact to improve human conditions. Contact information for inquiries is given.
UFO-NORGE Information
This section provides contact details for UFO-NORGE, including their postal address and a request for articles and submissions. It specifies manuscript requirements (typewritten, double-spaced, black and white illustrations) and preferred diskette formats. Readers willing to translate foreign articles are also sought. Information on obtaining UFO-NORGE folders to promote the organization and recruit members is also provided. A call for financial support for the UFO-NORGE support fund is made, with details on how to donate via postgiro.
Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance
The magazine consistently explores unexplained phenomena, with a focus on UFO sightings and the mysterious crop circle phenomenon. There is an open-minded approach to investigating these topics, presenting both eyewitness accounts and scientific or skeptical viewpoints. The editorial stance appears to be one of encouraging research and reporting of UFO-related events, while also acknowledging the need for critical analysis and distinguishing between factual accounts and fiction, as seen in the discussion of the Adamski case. The magazine also highlights technological theories related to UFOs and promotes the work of UFO research organizations.