UFO - 1984 No 4

Magazine Overview

This issue of "UFO" magazine, published by UFO-NORGE, is the third issue of the 1984 volume. It is a Norwegian publication focused on UFO phenomena. The cover features a striking image of flying saucers approaching Earth, with the main headline "UFO OVER NORDMØRE". The issue is dated 1984 and is identified as "3 ÅRGANG" (3rd year/volume).

Editorial and Organizational Information

The magazine is published by UFO-NORGE, an organization dedicated to the registration and study of UFO phenomena. The editorial team includes Finn Kalvik as the responsible editor, with Leif Havik, Frank Lie, and Knut Aasheim serving as editorial secretaries. Mentz D. Kaarbø is listed for the "RED. NORDIC UFO NEWS LETTER".

UFO-NORGE's daily leadership consists of a committee of five members: Elbjørg Fjeldberg, Hans Kr. Moe, Odd-Gunnar Røed, Erling Strand, and Knut Aasheim. The organization has various contact addresses for general information, reporting, and research, with regional departments (ØST, SØR, VEST, MIDT, NORD) led by designated individuals.

The magazine is published five times a year, with a subscription costing 90 KR for 1984. The issue also notes that the content reflects contributions to the understanding of UFO phenomena, and the organization or editorial staff are not necessarily responsible for or sharing the views expressed. Readers are encouraged to submit material, and the editorial staff reserves the right to edit or shorten submissions.

"From the Editors" (Fra redaksjonen)

The editorial section acknowledges a delay in publication, attributing it partly to economic challenges, leading to a combined issue (No. 4 & 5) being released just before Christmas. This marks the end of UFO-NORGE's third year. Plans for 1985 include a smaller format but the same amount of content per page, with potentially four issues.

The editors appeal to readers for support, urging them to renew subscriptions, recruit new members, or give subscriptions as Christmas gifts. They emphasize that reader support is crucial for the continuation of their work. The year 1984 is described as a relatively quiet year for major UFO sensations, with the notable exception of a front-page story in VG on August 7th, which is given extensive coverage in this issue. The editorial also mentions a "wave" in Gudbrandsdalen and renewed activity in the Hessdalen phenomena during the autumn.

Readers are invited to send in feedback, both positive and negative, as well as suggestions for content.

Main Article: UFO OVER NORDMØRE

This section details the sensational front-page story in the Norwegian newspaper VG on August 7, 1984, concerning a UFO photograph taken by Pål Kristian Vaag from Nordmøre. The article highlights that the photograph, taken in broad daylight, showed a "Curious Photo-Object" and surprised the Norwegian Air Force. Experts at the Air Force's photo department at Rygge and technicians at Norges Tekniske Høyskole were unable to declare the image a forgery, with one officer, Einar Smedsvig, stating that if it was a fake, it was "extremely skillfully made."

Pål Kristian Vaag's Account

Pål Kristian Vaag, a 21-year-old from Aure, recounts his experience on August 19, 1983. He was sitting on his porch when he saw an object descend from the sky. It approached vertically at a slow speed, stopped about 200 meters away, and then hovered. Vaag managed to retrieve a camera and take a picture. He describes the object as reflecting sunlight, but then its appearance changed, becoming gray and diffuse at the edges. Suddenly, it accelerated at high speed and disappeared within 1-2 seconds. The entire observation lasted about 2 minutes, and the object was completely silent. Vaag estimated its size to be about 10 meters in diameter at a distance of 200 meters.

Expert Opinions and Media Reactions

VG's August 8th edition featured a full-page report with the headline "EXPERTS BAFFLED". The article quotes Captain Kåre Kvamme, who stated that the photo was technically sound, with correct lighting, proportions, and angles, making a photomontage unlikely. He admitted that while he remained skeptical, he couldn't prove the photo was fake. He suggested the only possibility for a fake would be if something was thrown into the air and the photographer perfectly tracked it, requiring great skill or luck.

The article also includes a section titled "OPPKLART" (Explained) showing a Danish photograph that was initially thought to be a UFO but was later revealed to be a chemical spill on film. In contrast, the "UOPPKLART" (Unexplained) section details a sighting by five employees at the weather forecasting office and air traffic control at Bodø airport on January 16, 1983, of an oblong, cylindrical object that remained stationary for several minutes.

"UNSOLVED UFO MYSTERY"

This subheading refers to VG's August 11th report, which stated that the photograph was examined under one of the country's best microscopes at Norges Tekniske Høyskole in Trondheim, but still could not reveal the truth about the "nationally famous UFO picture."

Researcher Jarle Hjelen from NTH-SINTEF used scanning with an electron microscope, a technique that had previously helped debunk a UFO photo in Denmark by identifying a liquid drop that had etched the film. Hjelen, who personally admits to being skeptical of supernatural phenomena, stated that he could not reveal anything definitive from the microscopic analysis.

"WEATHER BALLOON EXCLUDED"

Meteorological assistant Thor Bretting from Ørlandet weather station dismissed the theory that the object could be a weather balloon, stating there was a "vanishingly small possibility" of this being the case.

Vaag's Reaction and "Press Reactions"

Vaag initially kept his experience and the photograph secret, fearing ridicule. He only mentioned it to fellow conscripts in Nord-Norge, which led to the story becoming known. He expressed regret for showing the picture to his comrades. The article notes that UFO-NORGE understands his reluctance, as many witnesses fear being labeled as hoaxers. They hope that more people will come forward with their experiences, citing a study that suggests only one in ten UFO experiences are reported.

Of the approximately 160 Norwegian newspapers, only eight published articles about the incident in the days following VG's report. These included "U-F-O-forfalskning!" and "A good joke" from Sunnmøre Arbeideravis, "Clever UFO bluff" from Sarpsborg Arbeiderblad, and "The Air Force: A Joke" from Tidens Krav. Other papers like Moss Dagblad suggested it was a "German washcloth," while Romsdalsposten noted "Sensational Aure photo." Nationen ran with "VG-UFO just a joke," and Dagbladet Sarpen reported on a local UFO observation. Bergens Tidende questioned "UFO-Burt in VG?", and Romsdalsposten again highlighted "Pål Kristian Vaag: I saw a UFO!" Dagbladet Sarpen later published an article on "How to expose UFO pictures."

The Swedish newspaper Aftonbladet also reported on August 14th with "UFO fever in Norway."

Investigations

Arne Børcke, a journalist and long-time UFO enthusiast, contacted Vaag for NTB. He found Vaag to be sober and straightforward, not embellishing the story, and seemingly uncomfortable with the attention. Vaag's mother reportedly expressed disbelief in the event. It was confirmed that Vaag had been a subscriber to UFO magazine for some time. The author of this section also spoke with Vaag and found his account to be positive.

UFO-NORGE had a representative attempt to interview Vaag in Aure, but the meeting was missed due to Vaag's military leave. Photographs were taken on-site, but a personal interview was postponed due to travel distances.

It is mentioned that Vaag had already sold the rights to the photograph to a friend for 500 KR, who then sought to sell it to newspapers internationally. The author of this section received permission from Vaag to use a copy of the photo for the magazine, as UFO-NORGE does not profit financially from such usage. Permission was also obtained to use material from VG, with the understanding that VG had purchased all rights to the photo, and both Vaag and his friend had received financial compensation.

UFO-Rapport is described as a small group of amateurs working on registration, not a formal organization.

Commentaries

The commentary section addresses the authenticity of the photo. The author notes that Vaag waited over six months to reveal the incident and show the photo, and later regretted it. This behavior is seen as inconsistent with a prank, as a prank only becomes one when it can be laughed at by others.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue strongly emphasizes the Pål Kristian Vaag UFO photograph, presenting it as a significant event that challenged official skepticism. The magazine highlights the difficulties in debunking the photo, even with advanced technology, and criticizes the media's tendency to dismiss such sightings as hoaxes or pranks. UFO-NORGE positions itself as a serious research organization, appealing for reader support to continue its work in understanding UFO phenomena. The editorial stance appears to be one of open inquiry, encouraging evidence-based discussion while acknowledging the challenges of public perception and media sensationalism. The issue also touches upon the broader context of UFO reporting, including the common pattern of sensation, ridicule, and eventual forgetting of sightings, and speculates on political influences in media coverage.

This issue of Nyt Aspekt, dated February 1984 (nr.2 '84), focuses on the controversial topic of alleged alien encounters on the Moon and other unexplained aerial phenomena. The cover boldly proclaims 'Astronauts were not alone – on the Moon!', hinting at a deep dive into conspiracy theories and suppressed information.

The Moon Landing Cover-Up?

The lead article, "ASTRONAUTENE VAR IKKE ALENE – PÅ MÅNEN!" (Astronauts Were Not Alone – On the Moon!), presents a sensational claim: that two non-terrestrial spacecraft intercepted the first human astronauts when they landed on the Moon. It questions the origin of these craft, whether contact was made, and why moon missions abruptly stopped in 1972. The article recounts the Apollo 11 landing on July 20, 1969, and the famous words of Neil Armstrong. It suggests that many listeners heard strange communications during the transmission, including conversations about "visitors" and "other spaceships" standing beside the lunar module. Despite NASA's official explanation of poor radio connection, amateur radio operators allegedly intercepted conversations indicating the presence of alien craft.

The article further claims that NASA employees, who no longer work for the space agency, have confirmed the presence of two alien spacecraft near the landing site during Apollo 11. These were allegedly photographed by the astronauts, but the UFOs were later removed from the images. It took eight years for new information about UFOs on the Moon to surface, published in the "National Enquirer," featuring an interview with Russian professor Dr. Wladimir Azhazha, who stated that Armstrong immediately reported observing two large objects near the landing craft.

Subsequent moon landings are also scrutinized. Apollo 12 showed astronaut Conrad surrounded by a silvery light, and tracks resembling footprints were found. Apollo 13 observed a launch facility with double ring-shaped walls on the Moon's far side. Apollo 15's crew photographed a five-sided structure on a lunar mountain. Apollo 16 and 17 reported seeing a blinking light, and Apollo 17 astronauts noted tracks resembling tire tracks and UFOs in formation, followed by a minor explosion that damaged a spacecraft antenna.

The article speculates that the abrupt cessation of moon exploration after Apollo 17, despite detailed plans for a permanent moon base, was due to the discovery of extraterrestrial presence. NASA's official reason of economic constraints is questioned, given the availability of unused Apollo spacecraft and rockets.

UFOs and Paranormal Aspects

An interview with Stanton T. Friedman, an atom physicist and ufologist, explores the nature of UFO phenomena. Friedman, who has studied UFOs for over 20 years, believes they are extraterrestrial spacecraft. He suggests that advanced civilizations capable of such technology would also understand paranormal phenomena like telepathy and psychokinesis. He dismisses many sightings as IFOs (Identified Flying Objects) but acknowledges a component that might be "paranormal" or "other-dimensional."

Friedman discusses radar cases where UFOs seemingly vanish, explaining it as a potential manipulation of plasma fields to absorb radar signals. He also touches upon the challenges in ufology, including the lack of full-time ufologists, inconsistent standards, and the need to focus on data rather than just collecting more reports. He advocates for using the Freedom of Information Act to access government and military data on UFOs, emphasizing the importance of spreading existing data and engaging with the public and scientific community.

Mysterious Lights and Phenomena

The magazine also features several articles detailing various unexplained aerial phenomena, often referred to as "fireballs" or "ball lightning."

One section, "LYSKULER 2" (Fireballs 2) by Hilary Evans, presents numerous case studies of these phenomena. It notes that while most meteors burn up in the atmosphere, some fall to Earth, and their unusual behavior sometimes defies conventional explanations. Examples include:

• Tucumcari, New Mexico (1951): A fireball fell, destroying a water tank and causing buildings to collapse, but no meteorite evidence was found.
• St. Helens, Lancashire (1938): A blinding blue fireball caused an explosion, and a similar phenomenon occurred nearby two weeks later, raising questions about coincidence.
• Canada (1913): A majestic procession of lights crossed the sky multiple times, following the same path despite Earth's rotation, suggesting controlled movement.
• Newfoundland (1887): A fireball rose from the water, moved against the wind, and then changed course and disappeared.
• Philadelphia (1960): A large, red fireball entered through a closed window, burning a witness's neck hairs.
• France (various dates): Several instances of fireballs entering rooms, passing through objects, and even causing explosions are detailed.

These cases are often classified as "ball lightning," but the article suggests their behavior points towards intelligent control rather than random atmospheric events. The term "fireball" itself is presented as a label for an unknown phenomenon.

Another section discusses "Foo Fighters," the term used by WWII pilots for unidentified aerial objects observed during the war. It describes them as large, bright, orange, and orange-colored lights that could maneuver with great control, following aircraft. One pilot, Bill Leet, ordered his crew not to shoot them down, stating that if they were hostile, they would have already been attacked.

The Patrick Eudy Case

A detailed account of Patrick Eudy, a car salesman who experienced a three-hour "blackout" in 1979, is presented. Following this event, he developed an intense interest in UFOs and aliens. Under hypnosis, facilitated by psychologist Henry Morton, Eudy recounted a story of being abducted by an alien craft. He described being taken into an oval-shaped vessel, encountering a silver-clad being, and undergoing a "test" involving sensations in his fingertips. Upon returning to his car, he found that three hours had passed. Morton expresses conviction in Eudy's account, labeling it a genuine UFO abduction.

Other Topics

The issue also briefly touches upon the discovery of a potential tenth planet in our solar system and the concept of "contactees" reporting 12 planets. It also includes a report on British authorities allegedly burning down a forest in Sussex to conceal marks from a crashed flying saucer.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the alleged cover-ups of extraterrestrial encounters, particularly concerning the Moon landings, and the presentation of numerous unexplained phenomena that defy conventional scientific explanations. The editorial stance appears to be one of skepticism towards official narratives and a strong belief in the existence of UFOs and alien intelligence, encouraging readers to question authority and seek hidden truths. The magazine promotes the idea that many anomalous events, from lunar sightings to terrestrial "fireballs," are evidence of non-human intelligence and that this information is being deliberately suppressed.

This issue of UFO-logien, identified as issue 27 and dated August 1983, focuses on a significant wave of UFO activity reported in Gudbrandsdalen, Norway, during that month. The cover headline, "UFO-BØLGE OVER GUDBRANDSDALEN," and the accompanying artwork of a UFO over Lillehammer, set the stage for a detailed investigation into these events. The magazine also includes articles exploring various UFO hypotheses and historical cases.

UFO-Bølge Over Gudbrandsdalen

The lead article details the events of August 1983 in Gudbrandsdalen, Norway. It begins with an account from Saturday, August 6th, where Helene and Nils Kristiansen observed a "spaceship" near Lillehammer, described as a 30-meter-long, egg-shaped craft with light emanating from its windows. The object moved from southwest, hovered over the town, and then disappeared westward.

On Sunday, August 13th, four witnesses at Veslesetra near Hundorp reported seeing a 1-meter diameter object that emitted a strong, bright light. It landed several times, turning red, and appeared to 'twist' into the ground before flying off. Karen Claussen, one of the witnesses, later contacted a newspaper, linking these sightings to strange fires reported in the same area.

The article then details a forest fire observed on Friday evening, August 12th, by an elderly couple at Toftesetra in Sør-Fron. They saw a fire moving with unusual 'up and sideways' flames. Later that night, around 2 AM on August 13th, firefighters were alerted to a fire in the Jetta area. They initially believed it was a cabin fire but could not locate it. Despite clear weather, the fire seemed to disappear and reappear. Experienced locals, however, maintained it was a real fire, not just lights.

The most dramatic events occurred on the night of Thursday, August 18th. Hundreds of residents in Gudbrandsdalen were awakened by bright lights and loud booms that shook houses and rattled windows. One witness in Sjødalen reported seeing a colossal light followed by two powerful booms. Another witness in Otta described a bright flash, comparable to midday, followed by a rumbling sound. Many reported waking up to intense light, with some seeing the light pulsate or flash twice before a loud 'bang' occurred.

Further accounts from Lillehammer describe a phenomenon that split light, making details impossible to discern. At Hovemoen, two guards reported seeing the sky turn all the colors of the rainbow, followed by a loud boom, leading them to believe an ammunition depot had exploded or a jet fighter had crashed. A woman in Svatsum woke to a loud 'smelt' and a house-shaking event, followed by a 'thud' as if a chimney had fallen. In Gausdal, a woman saw a white light pulsate twice, illuminating a large area, before a bang occurred.

Some reports describe a reversed sequence, where people heard the bang first and then saw a light. A man in Vinstra saw a luminous sphere moving slowly up and down over the river. Most witnesses, however, woke to the light, which lasted for several minutes before the 'bang' occurred.

An interesting 'footnote' to the fire reports mentions unusual tracks found in the moss near Saukampen, described as 10-20 meters long, perfectly straight, and about 10 cm wide and 4 cm deep, with all the moss scraped out. The witness promised to take photos, but these were not yet available.

UFO Og Vitenskapen (UFO and Science)

This section, authored by Hans Kr. Moe, delves into hypotheses attempting to explain UFO phenomena within a scientific framework. It categorizes potential explanations into several groups:

UFO Hypotheses

Meteorological Phenomena: Includes ball lightning, aurora borealis, clouds, atmospheric reflections, St. Elmo's fire, and plasma.

Astronomical Phenomena: Planets (Mars, Venus), stars (Sirius), and meteors, noting that meteors can sometimes stop and change course.

Biological Phenomena: Insect swarms, birds, and even floating spiderwebs reflecting light.

Technological Phenomena: Satellites, space debris, balloons (weather balloons), aircraft (planes, helicopters, airships), rockets, and artificial direct lights (not reflections).

Bluffs: Reports fabricated for financial gain, to ridicule others, or to gain attention.

Socio-scientific Phenomena: Hallucinations caused by psychological issues (neuroses, psychoses), mass suggestion, religious experiences, or the influence of consciousness-altering substances (alcohol, drugs). Illusions where observers are psychologically predisposed to see UFOs.

The author notes that after applying these conventional explanations, only about 5-10% of UFO reports remain as 'true' UFO phenomena, referred to as 'the hard core' by Dr. Hynek.

Alternative Hypotheses

Spaceships from non-terrestrial civilizations (The Visitation Hypothesis): This hypothesis suggests that interstellar travel is possible, and advanced civilizations may use anti-gravity or negative gravity for propulsion. While acknowledging the vast distances involved, the author points to ongoing research in quantum mechanics and unified field theories as potentially opening new possibilities.

Romdyr (Space Creatures) Hypothesis: This proposes that living organisms might originate and exist in or outside our atmosphere. The author draws parallels to reports of cars being followed by luminous orbs that behave like curious animals, suggesting this behavior is unlikely for beings with structured plans.

Technology/Beings from other dimensions: This hypothesis, while mentioned, is deemed not scientifically tenable due to its vague definition and lack of evidence.

Camouflage: The idea that UFO sightings are a cover for other activities from different civilizations is presented as a belief rather than a scientific hypothesis.

Hollow Earth Hypothesis: This theory suggests a highly advanced civilization resides within the Earth, with access points through the oceans or the poles. The author dismisses this due to the lack of evidence for such openings and the significant impact it would have on Earth's mass and orbit.

Future Visitations: The idea that civilizations from the future travel back in time to study their origins is considered pure science fiction.

Telepathy: The hypothesis that observers experience hallucinatory experiences due to telepathic stimuli from others.

Reliving the birth experience: Some close-encounter reports are suggested to stem from subconscious memories of the birth process, typically requiring hypnosis or medication to access.

The author emphasizes the need for more psychological data on UFO observers.

Atmospheric Phenomena not yet fully explained: This includes earthquake lights and other plasma phenomena, suggesting the need for advanced measurement equipment.

Form and Time

This section by Svein Fagerland explores the relationship between matter's form and time. It discusses how the 'swing time' in an electromagnetic circuit is determined by its components. The author touches upon the concept of a 'time machine' based on a self-oscillating electromagnetic circuit and the possibility of making imaginary time real. He also discusses the concept of a pendulum whose length is related to gravity and the idea of creating irregular real oscillations by combining two self-oscillating circuits.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently explores the UFO phenomenon with a focus on witness accounts and the search for scientific explanations, while also acknowledging more speculative theories. There's a clear emphasis on the 'intelligent' nature of many reported phenomena, distinguishing them from mere natural occurrences. The editorial stance appears to be one of open-minded inquiry, encouraging readers to examine the evidence and form their own conclusions, as suggested by the cover's "LES OG BEDØM SELV...." (Read and judge for yourself...). The magazine aims to bridge the gap between unexplained sightings and scientific understanding, presenting both conventional and unconventional hypotheses for consideration.

This issue of "UFO-OBSERVASJONER I NORGE" (UFO Observations in Norway) covers a period from September 1 to November 1, 1984, detailing numerous reports of unidentified aerial phenomena and related events across Norway. The magazine is published by UFO-Norge and includes a mix of witness testimonies, observational data, and investigative notes.

Key Articles and Reports

General Observations and Hessdalen Phenomenon

The issue begins by presenting a collection of observations received by UFO-Norge. It highlights that the Hessdalen region continues to be a focal point for phenomena, similar to previous years and since December 1981. The reports suggest that the nature of the phenomena remains consistent.

Several specific incidents are detailed:

• September 7, ca. 22:30: Three individuals at a seter (mountain farm) near Røhovdvika on Øyungen saw a large, blank light pulsating slowly towards Elgsjøen before disappearing. This observation occurred during the "Project Hessdalen" photo week, with similar sightings reported by Roar Wister.
• September 20 (approx.): A woman in Hessdalen reported seeing a blank object descending towards a peak. This was observed in daylight.
• September 27, 19:40: A large, blank light sphere was seen near the ground over Vårhuskjølen by three people. It turned red after 4-5 minutes before disappearing.
• September 29, 19:15: A blue, egg-shaped phenomenon was seen moving rapidly north over Skarvan near Øyungen.
• September 29, ca. 22:00: A man near Øversjødalen observed a bright, yellow light moving south, which then split into three distinct, sharp lights. The lights descended towards the ground behind a birch grove.

Incidents in Other Locations

Beyond Hessdalen, numerous other sightings were reported:

• Sødorp, near Vinstra: On an unspecified date, an elderly woman reported seeing an oval light, about 20x30 cm, with a warm color, enter her bedroom and disappear through a closed window. She felt no heat and heard no movement in the air.
• Hundorp: Agnes From reported a drop-shaped light, warm yellow-red and strong, moving up the valley and disappearing behind houses and trees. This was followed by a loud rushing or rattling sound, and then a loud bang.
• Segalstad Bru: A man reported seeing a light moving rapidly south and then north, accompanied by a heavy drone. Police confirmed a patrol car saw the light at the same time.
• Ottadalen: A student on the road from Stryn to Bismo saw a bright light flash, followed by what appeared to be large, colorful rockets ascending from the other side of the valley.
• Lom: A farmer saw a strong light in the sky behind a mountain, with a round object in the light that moved briefly before disappearing. The sound of short bangs was also reported in the area.
• Fåvang: Inga Huse reported seeing two strong flashes of light that projected a clear, rounded stripe of light onto her bedroom wall.
• Ridalen, near Brekken: A man saw two lights, one small and one large, moving parallel to his car and then disappearing towards the northeast.
• Røros: A man walking his dog saw a light sphere the size of a lamp, followed by three smaller spheres, all emitting a yellow-white light. The largest sphere appeared to have a downward-pointing light.

Project Hessdalen and Hummelfjell

An expedition to Hessdalen, referred to as "Høstprosjektet" (Autumn Project), took place from September 2 to September 9. Knut Holt and the author, along with observers from UFO-Sverige, set up camp at Finnsåhøgda Syd. Despite challenging weather conditions (rain, snow, wind), observations were made.

• September 2, 17:00: Cameras were set up on a peak near the camp. A strong, pulsating light was observed towards Øyungen, lasting until 20:34. Through binoculars, it appeared as a high, pointed flame.
• September 3: Weather conditions worsened, forcing the team to retreat to their tents.
• September 4: The day started with snow and wind. Observation began at 19:00 with three cameras, two equipped with spectral filters.
• September 4, 19:00: A bright, yellow-white sphere was observed over Finnsåhøgda, moving south and described as silent.
• September 5, 17:22: Observation began again. Visibility was good, with Karlsvogna visible. However, weather again forced the team to abandon observations.
• September 6, 17:18: The day was sunny, but at 17:43, a strange stillness occurred, followed by wind from the west. No specific phenomena were reported on this day.

The issue also discusses observations near Hummelfjell, noting that while some phenomena might be explained as stars or planets, further investigation is needed. Reports from October 22, 29, and other dates in October are mentioned, with some suggesting possible planetary influence but also noting discrepancies that point to other explanations.

Other Reports and Analysis

• October 18: A report from Trysil mentioned a blue light landing in the mountains, causing the house to shake.
• October 31: A report from Holmlia, near Oslo, described a yellow-white object moving in distinct wave-like motions, considered very interesting.

Book Review

A review of the book "UFO-forskning i Sovjetunionen" (UFO Research in the Soviet Union) by Juri Lina is included. The book is praised for confirming similar UFO events occurring in the Soviet Union and for offering a perspective on how the Soviet regime handled such phenomena. Juri Lina, an Estonian author, is described as having been persecuted for his interest in UFOs and having to flee his country.

Contact Information

Contact information is provided for ordering a detailed 17-page report on UFO observations for 30 Norwegian Kroner. The contact is Per Ottesen at UFO-Norge.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the persistent and varied UFO sightings in Norway, particularly the Hessdalen phenomenon, and the challenges in identifying and explaining these events. The editorial stance appears to be one of serious inquiry, collecting witness accounts, and attempting to find rational explanations while acknowledging the possibility of unknown phenomena. There is an emphasis on detailed reporting and the collection of data, as seen in the "Project Hessdalen" expedition. The magazine encourages further reporting and promises to follow up on new information.

This issue of ÅRGANGS·UFO, volume 4 from 1984, is a Norwegian publication focusing on UFO phenomena, scientific explanations of related events, and theories about ancient advanced civilizations. The magazine features reports from UFO-Norge, a Norwegian UFO information group, and includes articles by various researchers and witnesses.

Hessdalen Observations

The issue begins with a log from Roar Wister detailing observations in Hessdalen, Norway. On an unspecified date, an observer noted a blue light, which was photographed and classified as an F7 (UFO). The light was persistent, and two instances of a fast-moving light were also observed nearby. The blue light remained visible until dawn. The following days were hampered by poor visibility due to fog, with no further observations made. The observer notes that the weather conditions for observation were the worst he had ever experienced in Hessdalen, and mentions issues with films that will be discussed later.

Meteors and Meteorites

An article by Knut Holt explains the phenomena of meteors and meteorfalls, noting their potential to be confused with UFOs. The article details the composition and types of meteorites, including iron, sulfur, and silicate-based meteorites, and mentions the presence of water, carbon, and hydrocarbons within them. It describes how meteors appear in the atmosphere, their shapes, colors, and the light they emit due to friction and the excitation of air molecules. The article also touches upon the sounds meteors can produce and the possibility of them leaving craters if they are large enough.

UFO Sighting in Tromsø

Bilselger Askjell M. Botholfsen recounts an encounter near Tromsø on January 12th. While driving, he observed a disc-shaped object, approximately 100 meters away, moving at high speed (estimated 200-300 km/h) and very low to the ground. The object emitted a strong yellow/orange light from its center and a weaker red light from its edges. The object's proximity caused his car's lights and engine to stop, and he experienced symptoms of shock, including dizziness and a headache. The object then ascended and moved away at a steep angle with significant acceleration. Botholfsen's electrical devices, including his wristwatch and car clock, stopped for about five minutes during the encounter. He was 47 years old at the time and had a background as a pilot and aircraft engineer.

UFO Sighting near Hundalen

Another report details an observation by Per Isachsen, his wife Jorun, and their 11-year-old daughter Lillian on November 17, 1974, near Hundalen. They saw a luminous yellow/orange object with a constant, strong light moving from north to south. The object changed speed multiple times, hovered, and then ascended. Initially appearing about 10 cm in size at arm's length, its apparent size changed over five minutes. A total of seven people witnessed the phenomenon. Isachsen rules out natural explanations like meteors or airplanes due to the object's movement and behavior.

Book Review: 'Teknik i Forntiden'

The issue features a review of the book "Teknik i Forntiden" (Technology in Antiquity) by the late Henry Kjellson, with updates and additional material by Carl-Anton Mattsson. The book explores the theory that ancient civilizations possessed highly advanced technology, including knowledge of electricity, dynamite, and radioactive substances. It presents evidence from Egypt, India, Mexico, and China, discussing acoustic levitation techniques used in Tibet and the possible location of the Ark of the Covenant. Kjellson, a former pilot and engineer, was convinced of the existence of advanced ancient cultures. The book, originally published in 1956 and 1961, has been re-released as a single volume. It contains extensive photographic material and is described as surprisingly relevant today.

Radio Astronomy and SETI

An article discusses the work of Harvard professor and physicist Paul Horowitz, who has been listening for signals from outer space for over a year. His project aims to prove the existence of extraterrestrial beings and establish contact. Horowitz believes that if aliens are trying to communicate, they would likely use the simplest possible method. His research involves using a large telescope at Harvard and tuning into specific radio frequencies. He acknowledges that success may not come quickly but remains convinced that contact will be made within the next 200 years.

Oslo UFO-forening

Information is provided about the Oslo UFO-forening, a society for active UFO enthusiasts founded in 1984. The group aims to train members in various UFO-related work and has organized photo courses and lectures. They are seeking new members to contribute to their activities.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently explores UFO sightings, often emphasizing witness accounts and the potential for misidentification with natural phenomena like meteors. There is a clear interest in the scientific aspects of these events, as seen in the detailed explanation of meteors. The inclusion of the book review on ancient technology suggests an openness to theories about advanced past civilizations and their capabilities, aligning with a broader ufological interest in unexplained phenomena and historical mysteries. The publication also serves as a platform for UFO organizations and their activities, encouraging public participation and information sharing.

This issue of "PRESSEKLIPP" (Press Clippings) is a compilation of UFO-related news and reports from various Norwegian newspapers and publications, primarily covering the months of July, August, September, and October 1984. The magazine functions as a digest of public sightings, expert opinions, and ongoing discussions within the UFO community in Norway.

July Reports

The July section begins with a mention of an article in "Finnmark Dagblad" by Evald Larsen, who writes about UFO observations in Hessdalen and near-contact experiences. Another article in "Norsk Ukeblad" features celebrities like Finn Kalvik, Inger Lise Rypdal, Sølvi Wang, and Egil Monn Iversen sharing their past UFO experiences.

August Reports

August is dominated by a specific UFO photograph that generated significant press attention. The magazine highlights "VG" as being the first to publish the photo on August 7th, showing a UFO allegedly "shot down" by Pål Kristian Vaag from Aure, Nordmøre, in August of the previous year. Initial conclusions from the Air Force suggested the photo was not a forgery. "Romsdalsposten" on August 8th referred to it as the "Sensational Aure Photo" and quoted Captain Kåre Kvamme from the Air Force, who had previously called UFO photos a "summer joke." Kvamme admitted his theory about an object being thrown from a rooftop was just a theory and unproven. "Moss Dagblad" questioned if the UFO was a "German washbasin," a comment attributed to the same Captain Kvamme, who suggested the UFO might be of German origin, possibly related to NATO.

September Reports

"Romsdalsposten" on September 9th reported on Pål Kristian Vaag's account of photographing the UFO, stating he was sure of what he saw. He described the craft moving slowly, changing color, and disappearing. He estimated its size to be between 10 and 15 meters in diameter. Vaag delayed developing the film until Easter, fearing he would be labeled a liar. "Sarpen" discussed how fake UFO photos are revealed and genuine ones are confirmed, referencing the work of "Ground Saucer Watch." "VG" reported that the Aure UFO photo was examined at the Norwegian Institute of Technology (NTH) in Trondheim using a microscope, but the analysis, conducted by researcher Jarle Hjelen, could not disprove the photo. "Bergens-Expressen" featured an interview with the magazine's editor. "Fjordingen" reported on strange tracks found in Hornindal, possibly caused by a landing object. "Sunnmørsposten" suggested that similar tracks might be caused by ball lightning. "Ringerikes Blad" mentioned an observation of a mysterious luminous object over Krokskogen. "Sunnmørsposten" also reported on a "pulsating light fleck" observed over Sula by the Søvik family, described as a large, oval light that blinked about once per second. Aviation authorities indicated it was unlikely to be a commercial flight.

October Reports

"Drammens Tidende/Buskeruds Blad" reported on a mysterious crater-like hole found on Raudalsfjellet in Gol, speculating if a UFO could be the cause, alongside other possibilities like lightning strikes or meteorites. "Glåmdalen" reported an observation of three moons in the sky over Disenå by Olaf Mastad, two yellow and one bright, which later reduced to two. "Arbeidets Rett" mentioned a UFO sighting over Øversjødalen, where three distinct lights were seen descending before disappearing behind a ridge. The observer noted the treetops being illuminated. "Tidens Krav" quoted Eddy Hansen stating, "UFOs definitely exist." "Glåmdalen" reported a man in Austvatn seeing a blinking object on the horizon that was too bright for a star and too stationary for an airplane. The magazine also included a "notis" from Johnny Hølen seeking issues 2 and 3 of the 1982 "UFO" magazine. It was also noted that the 1982 and 1983 issues of "UFO" were sold out.

Other Content

The issue includes an "EGENRAPPORT FRA FINN W." (Own Report from Finn W.) detailing an observation made in Alcudia, Mallorca, on September 23, 1984. Finn W. observed a stationary light and a smaller object that rotated counter-clockwise, emitting a deep red light beam. The report includes a drawing of the phenomenon. There are also advertisements for UFO-related literature, including books on psychology, mysticism, and UFOs, as well as a binder for "UFO" magazines and a novelty pen with a light. A section titled "HVIS DU SER EN UFO – HVA GJØR DU DA?" (If You See a UFO – What Do You Do?) provides a checklist for observers, covering details like time, location, course, altitude, object characteristics, witnesses, photography, and reporting procedures.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring theme is the reporting and analysis of UFO sightings and related phenomena. The magazine appears to be a platform for UFO enthusiasts to share information and discuss observations. The editorial stance is one of open inquiry, presenting various reports and expert opinions, even those that are skeptical, while also encouraging active participation and information sharing among readers. The publication aims to document and disseminate UFO-related news within Norway and to a wider audience.