UFO Student - Magazine No 1

Magazine Overview

'Der UFO-Student – Kritisches Magazin für UFO-Forschung' (The UFO Student – Critical Magazine for UFO Research) is a German-language magazine dedicated to a critical examination of the UFO phenomenon. The first issue, dated 1/2000 and volume 1, was published on December 31, 1999, and was offered free of charge. The magazine positions itself as a critical medium, explicitly stating that readers will find no pro-ufological or sectarian content.

Editorial: Auf zu neuen Taten (On to New Deeds)

The editorial, written by Tino A. Günter, welcomes readers to the first issue and marks the beginning of the new millennium for UFO research. Günter expresses the hope of informing both seasoned researchers and newcomers about the UFO phenomenon. The magazine aims to be a quarterly companion, offering advice and support in navigating the often confusing realm of 'UFOria'.

This inaugural issue features a significant interview with Robert Sheaffer, described as a 'prime skeptic' from CSICOP, who answers questions from Christian Sommerer on UFOs, society, and religion. The editorial also highlights the contribution of Werner Walter, a German UFO critic, who identifies UFO research as a genuine 'problem zone.' Dennis Kirstein, editor-in-chief of the 'Elektronisches UFO-Magazin,' also sees a UFO problem. The editorial promises further interesting articles.

Readers are invited to submit letters to the editor to provide feedback and suggestions for improvement. The magazine defines UFOs, following Dr. Dieter Sträuli, as objects observed during the day or night that cannot be identified as known phenomena like aircraft, balloons, celestial bodies, or meteorological events. However, it distinguishes this from the 'UFO myth,' which posits intelligent extraterrestrial beings visiting Earth in advanced spacecraft. The editorial concludes by emphasizing the need to apply the lessons learned from 50 years of UFO research as the magazine embarks on its mission.

Articles and Reports

Problemzone UFO-Forschung (Problem Zone UFO Research) by Werner Walter

Werner Walter's article addresses the challenges and pitfalls of UFO research. He outlines the initial step in evaluating a sighting as summarizing available data and checking for known aerial phenomena like balloons, aircraft, or meteors. Walter quotes Gene and Clare Gurney from 'Unidentified Flying Objects,' stating that most unidentified flying objects eventually become identified, and that a lack of knowledge about aircraft or other phenomena leads to UFO reports.

Walter criticizes the majority of UFO enthusiasts and 'ufologists' for lacking basic research skills, investigative techniques, and cross-checking abilities, often hiding behind a 'will to believe.' He notes that genuine critical inquiry and self-criticism are rare, with naivety and credulity fueling UFO superstition. He references Jacques Vallee's observation about the detrimental influence of deliberate misinformation in paranormal research, where unverified reports are quickly accepted without rigorous verification. Walter points out that media coverage often lends an air of seriousness to sensationalized accounts, making them the primary source of 'knowledge' about paranormal phenomena. He laments that even educated individuals with scientific backgrounds can fall victim to these narratives.

Walter further discusses how the 'UFO problem' is often exploited commercially, with writers profiting from the public's fascination with aliens and UFOs. He cites Garner Soule's 1967 book 'UFOs & IFOs,' which, despite being written by a non-ufologist, highlighted that most unidentified flying objects are ultimately identifiable, while acknowledging that some remain unexplained. Soule noted the lack of confirmed sightings by space surveillance and observatories, suggesting the persistent possibility of misidentification (IFO - Identified Flying Object).

Walter questions the methodology of UFO research, likening it to 'kindergarten ufology' that compiles colorful pictures based on superficial patterns to create a 'science.' He argues that academic titles do not guarantee seriousness in UFO investigation, as these titles are often earned in unrelated fields. He criticizes the tendency of 'UFO sector' figures to flaunt their titles for respect, despite a lack of demonstrable analytical skills in the UFO field, leading to 'parawissenschaft' (para-science).

He explains that 'parawissenschaft' refers to research projects that the scientific community generally distances itself from, distinguishing it from 'pseudoscience,' which carries a negative connotation. He clarifies that not all beliefs or superstitions qualify as parawissenschaft; it becomes so when it claims to be based on scientific evidence.

Am Himmel der Azoren (In the Sky of the Azores)

This section details a UFO flap that occurred in the Azores archipelago between October 7 and 15, 1976. Reports suggest that the radar at Lajes Airport registered around 10 UFOs during this period, but the information was classified. Several specific sightings are described:

• October 10, 1976: Four witnesses, including TWA and SATA employees, observed two intense white light masses over Facho Peak, with the higher object appearing peanut-shaped. They moved slowly and disappeared.
• October 13, 1976: A bright white light appeared over Barroca Peak, described as changing in intensity. Two bright satellites were seen near the object, which appeared to have dark spots and moved horizontally. The witness, a controller, described it as an unusual phenomenon.
• October 15, 1976: Moviegoers in Ponta Delgada saw a luminous, bright white object with red and blue streaks, resembling a camera flash. One witness followed it and observed three foot-like light beams extending downwards.

The article notes that a similar sighting was reported in Heidelberg in March 1996, where a witness described a bright object with 'three feet' that turned out to be the planet Venus. The author criticizes the lack of proper investigation into such sightings, particularly the failure to check astronomical data, which could easily explain many phenomena.

Further Analysis of UFO Research

The magazine continues to critique UFO research, highlighting how apparent UFO sightings are often misidentified celestial bodies like Jupiter or Venus, or even mundane objects like balloons or aircraft. The article points out that even experienced 'ufologists' with decades of involvement fail to consider simple explanations, indicating a fundamental problem within the field. The author suggests that the UFO phenomenon is often driven by a desire to believe rather than rigorous scientific inquiry.

Examples are given of UFO reports from Australia and Canada, where a high percentage of sightings are identified as IFOs (Identified Flying Objects). The article questions the methodology of UFOlogists, who often rely on anecdotal evidence and personal beliefs rather than systematic scientific investigation. It criticizes the commercialization of UFO literature and the tendency for 'experts' to present misidentified objects as genuine UFOs.

The magazine emphasizes that UFO research is largely a private hobby, lacking formal governmental or scientific backing, which opens the door to various questionable individuals and claims. It cites a statement from a conservative UFO vendor admitting that 90-95% of UFO reports stem from banal causes and that 85% of ufologists are unserious.

The issue also touches upon the lack of willingness among some UFO movement leaders to engage with critical arguments, even refusing to open mail from known UFO critics. The analysis of the UFO phenomenon is often based on 'information management' rather than empirical investigation. The article includes a letter from a twelve-year-old boy who has been researching UFOs for three years, illustrating the engagement of younger generations.

Allan Hendry is quoted describing a ufologist as a mixture of a fortune-teller and a medicine man, desperately trying to fit an 'alien schema' onto insufficient evidence. The debate is often linked to the question of intelligent life in the cosmos, drawing parallels to hobby zoologists searching for mythical creatures. The article concludes that UFO research is primarily a private hobby, susceptible to all sorts of strange characters, both among witnesses and researchers.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue of 'Der UFO-Student' firmly establishes its critical and skeptical stance towards UFO research. The recurring themes include the inadequacy of research methodologies, the prevalence of misidentification (IFO's), the commercial exploitation of the UFO topic, and the psychological motivations behind belief in UFOs and extraterrestrial visitation. The magazine advocates for a scientific approach, emphasizing the importance of checking astronomical data and known aerial phenomena before classifying a sighting as a UFO. The editorial stance is clear: to debunk sensational claims and promote a rational, evidence-based understanding of the UFO phenomenon, distinguishing between the 'UFO problem' (a cultural and psychological phenomenon) and actual unidentified flying objects.

This issue of "Der Ufo-Student – Kritisches Magazin für UFO-Forschung" (The UFO Student – Critical Magazine for UFO Research) delves into a critical examination of the field of UFOlogy, questioning the methodologies, credibility of evidence, and the motivations of many involved. The magazine argues that a significant portion of reported UFO phenomena are actually Identified Flying Objects (IFOs) that are frequently misidentified due to a lack of proper investigation and an overreliance on emotional interpretations.

The Problem of IFOs and Misidentification

The article begins by highlighting how a substantial number of UFO cases are attributable to IFOs, yet UFO theorists often jump to extraordinary conclusions. It points out that while some UFO cases might be genuine, the majority are not, and the field is plagued by individuals who present IFOs as evidence for grand theories. The text criticizes the tendency within the UFO community to overlook simple explanations, such as weather balloons or aircraft, and instead propose elaborate hypotheses about extraterrestrial visitation. The author notes that even well-known UFO researchers and organizations sometimes fail to adequately filter out IFOs, contributing to the field's reputation for sensationalism rather than scientific rigor.

Critique of UFOlogists and Methodology

A central theme is the critique of UFOlogists themselves. The magazine suggests that many are driven by a desire for personal thrill or a "will to believe" rather than a commitment to objective investigation. This emotional predisposition, it is argued, leads to poor handling of case materials. The author contrasts this with the ideal of an "amateur investigative journalist" as described by Hendry. The article laments the frequent invocation of "science" and "research" by individuals whose work is often anecdotal and lacks empirical grounding. It suggests that a sociological approach to UFO phenomena is perhaps the most scientifically defensible, yet it is precisely this approach that most UFOlogists avoid.

The text further elaborates on how individuals from various professional backgrounds, including engineers, astronomers, and psychologists, often bring their own biases and limited perspectives to UFO research. It highlights instances where individuals with scientific training have been misled by misinterpretations, such as confusing celestial bodies with alien craft. The article posits that no one in the field possesses a UFO-specific education, and knowledge is largely self-taught, leading to a lack of standardized methodology.

Case Studies and Explanations

The magazine presents several case studies to illustrate its points:

• The Honshu Case (Japan, 1952): A pilot reported seeing a rotating bundle of lights. This was later identified by USAF reports, with the help of astronomers like Dr. Donald Howard Menzel, as Venus, with the rotation attributed to atmospheric conditions splitting light into colors.
• The Killian Sighting (USA, 1959): Captain Peter W. Killian reported seeing three bright lights. This sighting, initially sensationalized, was eventually identified by the Air Force as a KC-97 tanker aircraft conducting a night refueling operation. Killian admitted he was unfamiliar with such operations.
• The Fort Thompson Sighting (USA, 1966): Observers reported a bluish-glowing light that changed colors and moved slowly. While initially puzzling, the article suggests an astronomical solution, noting that such lights can be mistaken for other phenomena.
• The Lubbock Lights (USA, 1951): Geologists reported seeing unexplained lights. The article suggests these were likely birds (plover) reflecting light from streetlamps, demonstrating how even educated individuals can be fooled by mundane phenomena.
• Astronaut Sightings: The magazine discusses reports from astronauts, including John Glenn, Scott Carpenter, James McDivitt, and Frank Borman. These sightings, often described as "fireflies" or unidentified objects, were frequently identified by NASA as ice crystals, space debris, or other known objects after investigation. The article notes that spacecraft windows can be obscured by ice and propellant residue, contributing to misperceptions.

The Role of Technology and Observation

The article also touches upon the use of optical instruments like binoculars in UFO observation, suggesting they can often lead to misidentifications, particularly of stars and planets, due to atmospheric distortions. It criticizes UFO literature for often failing to adequately address these mundane explanations, instead focusing on "high-strangeness reports" which are more sensational but less likely to yield clear answers.

Space Debris and "Space UFOs"

Another section addresses the issue of space debris. The magazine explains that discarded rocket stages and other equipment launched into orbit can become mistaken for UFOs by astronauts. These objects, sometimes referred to as "space UFOs," are often remnants of space missions and can be mistaken for alien craft, particularly when observed under unusual lighting conditions or when spacecraft windows are contaminated.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The overarching theme of this issue is a strong skepticism towards the prevailing narratives within UFOlogy. The magazine advocates for a more rigorous, evidence-based approach, emphasizing the critical importance of identifying and eliminating IFOs before considering more extraordinary explanations. The editorial stance is clearly critical of sensationalism and the "will to believe" that often characterizes the UFO community, urging for a more grounded and scientific investigation of reported phenomena. The article concludes by suggesting that many UFO sightings, even those reported by astronauts or pilots, can be explained by mundane causes when investigated thoroughly and objectively.

This issue of "Der Ufo-Student – Kritisches Magazin für UFO-Forschung" (The UFO Student – Critical Magazine for UFO Research) delves into the complexities and often deceptive nature of UFO phenomena. It critically examines various cases, investigations, and the methodologies employed by UFO researchers, with a strong emphasis on identifying hoaxes, misidentifications, and the challenges of maintaining scientific rigor in the field.

The Mantell Incident

The issue begins by recounting the famous Mantell incident, which occurred in Kentucky in 1948. Captain Thomas Mantell pursued a flying object and died in the crash of his F-51. Initially, various sensational explanations circulated, including the object disintegrating Mantell's plane or alien abduction. However, the USAF's investigation concluded that Mantell had flown too high, lost consciousness, and crashed. The article notes that ground witnesses also reported seeing the planet Venus, a claim that was met with skepticism given the time of day.

The Nature of UFO Evidence and Research

The magazine strongly critiques the state of UFO research, particularly the tendency to accept unverified reports and jump to exotic conclusions. It highlights the work of Allan Hendry, a former editor of the International UFO Reporter, who was reportedly fired by J. Allen Hynek for identifying too many UFOs. Hendry's perspective is that UFOlogy is not a true science and that many reports are misidentifications (IFOs) or fabrications. The article emphasizes the need for researchers to thoroughly understand the spectrum of known phenomena (IFOs) before labeling something as an unidentified flying object (UFO).

Critiques of Ufology

Several points are raised against the prevailing ufological community:

• Lack of Scientific Rigor: Many UFO groups are criticized for readily accepting reports without proper investigation and for being unwilling to explore natural explanations.
• Wishful Thinking: There's a tendency for both witnesses and researchers to want to believe in exotic explanations, leading to a bias in interpretation.
• Pseudo-Science: The magazine argues that much of UFOlogy operates as pseudo-science, lacking empirical evidence and relying on speculative hypotheses.
• Emotional Component: The emotional investment of witnesses and researchers is seen as a significant factor that can cloud objective analysis.

Case Studies of Hoaxes and Misidentifications

The issue presents several detailed case studies to illustrate the points made:

• The "Flying Hat" of Santa Ana (1965): Rex Heflin photographed a large, hat-shaped object. The original photos mysteriously disappeared, and while initially considered credible by some, later analysis suggested it was a small object photographed at close range, possibly a hoax.
• The Skillingaryd Photos (1971): Lars Thoern took photos of a supposed flying saucer in Sweden. These were initially hailed as significant evidence but were later debunked by the GICOFF investigation, which revealed the object to be a model made from Chevrolet hubcaps suspended by wires.
• Westport Weather Balloons (1966): A school group released weather balloons with signal flares, which were mistaken for UFOs by local newspapers, leading to exaggerated reports.
• "Gas Ring Mystery" Cases: Several incidents involving strange lights in formations are discussed, with the magazine questioning whether they are natural phenomena or something more, but still urging caution against immediate exotic interpretations.

The Importance of IFO Analysis

A significant portion of the magazine is dedicated to the importance of identifying and understanding Identified Flying Objects (IFOs). It is stated that 95% or more of UFO reports are misidentifications of known phenomena. Researchers are urged to be meticulous in their analysis and to avoid jumping to conclusions, especially when dealing with photographic evidence, which can be easily faked.

The "UFO Handbook" and its Impact

The issue references "The UFO Handbook" by Allan Hendry as an important step in UFO investigation. However, it notes that many academic UFO researchers overlook Hendry's work, possibly because he tended to demystify phenomena by finding mundane explanations.

The "Free Academy of Ufology"

The article touches upon groups like the "Freie Akademie der UFOlogie" (Free Academy of Ufology), which have declared themselves independent of established science, suggesting a growing divide and a rejection of scientific methods in favor of more speculative approaches.

Conclusion on UFOlogy

The magazine concludes that UFOlogy, in its current form, is largely a matter of "appearance rather than substance" (mehr Schein als Sein). It warns against deception and manipulation within the field, whether for personal gain, ego, or a misguided sense of contributing to a "good cause." The article suggests that many UFO stories originate from bluffs and that even seemingly compelling evidence can be fabricated. The core message is a call for critical thinking, skepticism, and a rigorous scientific approach to UFO phenomena, emphasizing that without clear differentiation between real UFOs and IFOs, the field will continue to be plagued by fantasy and deception.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes throughout this issue are the prevalence of hoaxes and misidentifications in UFO reports, the critical need for rigorous scientific investigation, and the critique of ufology as a field that often lacks scientific credibility. The editorial stance is clearly skeptical, advocating for natural explanations and cautioning against the uncritical acceptance of exotic or extraterrestrial hypotheses. The magazine champions a methodical, evidence-based approach, highlighting the importance of understanding known phenomena (IFOs) before venturing into the realm of the truly unexplained.

This issue of "Der Ufo-Student – Kritisches Magazin für UFO-Forschung" (The UFO Student – Critical Magazine for UFO Research) focuses on the challenges and controversies surrounding the study of unidentified flying objects (UFOs).

The UFO Problem: Lack of Seriousness

Dennis Kirstein's article, "Das UFO-Problem: Über die mangelnde Ernsthaftigkeit eines ernsten Themas" (The UFO Problem: On the Lack of Seriousness of a Serious Topic), addresses the primary obstacle for UFO enthusiasts and researchers: the lack of societal recognition and serious treatment of the subject. Kirstein notes that admitting an interest in UFOs requires courage, as believers are often ridiculed, called names, or even threatened. He argues that society fails to grasp the potential reality of UFOs because it doesn't fit their worldview. Younger generations, exposed to a more interconnected world and space exploration, tend to have a more universal worldview and are more open to the existence of UFOs than older generations. This societal resistance, Kirstein contends, leads to a significant "dark figure" of unreported sightings, as people fear ridicule and ostracism. He criticizes the media's tendency to sensationalize UFOs or dismiss them outright, making it difficult for serious research to emerge. The article highlights a cycle where media attention wanes, and UFO reports seemingly disappear, only to resurface later.

Kirstein also critiques media portrayals, citing an RTL documentary titled "Entlarvt – Die größten Bluffs der Welt" (Unmasked – The World's Biggest Bluffs) that misrepresented the case of Eduard "Billy" Meier, portraying him as still believed by many UFO researchers and incorrectly placing Roswell in Nevada. He argues that sensationalist media prioritizes entertainment over factual reporting, contributing to a distorted public image of UFO research.

To combat this, Kirstein suggests that UFO research needs to be brought to the public through honest, serious articles, magazines, and informative websites. He believes that once the UFO topic is taken seriously, progress towards understanding the truth will be made.

Analysis of UFO Sightings and Explanations

The magazine also presents a section detailing specific UFO observations, often with skeptical explanations. One report describes a family in Nelson, Kootenay Lake, Canada, observing an orange, ball-shaped UFO in late 1967 or early 1968. The object hovered, emitted sparks, and one witness saw multiple such objects. The local newspaper, "The Times," reported this as a UFO with sparks. Another witness, Glen Merry, described the lights as "flying saucers" that moved low and appeared to pass the moon. Professor Rupert H. MacNeil of Acadia University supported the idea that unidentified aerial phenomena were not mere fantasy, noting that the National Research Council had investigated such cases. He categorized UFOs into "round balls like fire and elongated, torpedo-shaped objects."

However, a more mundane explanation emerged for some sightings in the region. A 12-year-old boy, Frank Schleichermacher, initially reported seeing an object with a "small beam of white light" that moved back and forth. When his parents arrived, they only saw an orange light ball. Astronomer Bob McAlister investigated these sightings and concluded they were likely fireballs. Later, it was revealed that two boys had created a hot air balloon effect using plastic bags and birthday candles, which mimicked the glowing UFOs. The RCMP and fire chief intervened, and the children's "experiments" were stopped.

Another observation from December 31, 1967, in Middlefield, Canada, involved four witnesses seeing a dark red, round object, described as "smaller than the moon," hovering for ten minutes before disappearing. This sighting is also presented with the implication of a possible hot air balloon explanation.

The 10 UFO Research Guidelines Under Scrutiny

Tino Günter's article, "Die 10 UFO-Forschungsrichtlinien im Kreuzfeuer" (The 10 UFO Research Guidelines Under Fire), examines the "Ten UFO Research Principles" developed by Phil Klass, which are influential in German UFO research, particularly through CENAP (Central Research Network for Extraordinary Aerial Phenomena). Günter criticizes how these principles have been interpreted and applied, especially by Stefan Stickler, who he claims misunderstood them.

Günter clarifies Klass's guidelines, which are presented as a framework for serious UFO investigation. The article includes CENAP's presentation of these guidelines and Günter's commentary on each.

CENAP's First Guideline: "Even completely honest, upright, and intelligent people who are suddenly confronted with an equally short and unexpected event, in which an object unfamiliar to them is involved, run the risk of describing the incident extremely inaccurately when trying to do so."

Günter's commentary argues that this doesn't mean witnesses are inherently untrustworthy but acknowledges that shock and unfamiliarity can affect recall. He points out that Klass does not claim these people are unbelievable but rather that detailed descriptions are difficult under such circumstances. He also notes that the public perception of UFO sightings often associates them with fantasists, which Klass's guidelines aim to correct by stating that anyone can see a UFO.

CENAP's Second Guideline: "Despite human perception being subject to limitations when dealing with short, unexpected, and unusual events, eyewitness observations can be relatively accurate in part. The problem facing the UFO researcher lies primarily in the task of distinguishing between details that are reproduced relatively accurately and those that are reproduced completely distorted. As long as the true identity of the UFO cannot be determined, this may even be impossible, so that UFO research in some cases faces an unsolvable problem."

Günter agrees that perception is limited and that the processing of these perceptions is crucial. He acknowledges that eyewitness accounts are subjective and that the researcher's job is to extract objective information. He defends Werner Walter's stance, stating that Walter doesn't dismiss believers but rather uses Klass's guidelines as a framework for serious investigation, encouraging learning from others' experiences.

CENAP's Third Guideline: "If a person sees an unusual and unfamiliar object and concludes that it is a spaceship from another world, they will also assume in connection with this assumption that this object is reacting to their presence or their actions, whereas in reality, there need not be any connection between cause and effect."

Günter strongly disagrees with this interpretation, stating that witnesses do not typically assume the object is reacting to them. He dismisses the idea as applicable only to a few religious cult fanatics. He mentions cases where objects seemed to react to witnesses, citing the "rider effect" as an example. He also notes that UFO landings, contacts, photos, or alien bodies are often dismissed by CENAP as psychological issues or fraud.

CENAP's Fourth Guideline: "The media, which strongly highlights UFO sightings when they are reported, generally pays little or no attention to the case if it is clearly explained and attributed to completely prosaic facts and circumstances."

Günter acknowledges this media behavior but argues that it doesn't mean all cases are false. He states that this guideline points out that media often fails to report the true stimulus when a case is resolved, thus shaping the public's image of UFOs.

CENAP's Fifth Guideline: "A human observer, including experienced pilots, cannot possibly estimate the distance and height, or the size of an unknown object in the sky, unless it is in immediate proximity to a known object whose height and size are known."

Günter expresses disbelief at this, arguing that experienced pilots must possess such skills to avoid mid-air collisions. He mentions radar and air traffic control as aids but notes that CENAP seems to doubt even these. He concedes that without reference points, estimating size and distance is difficult, and this effect is often exploited in UFO photo hoaxes using small models.

CENAP's Sixth Guideline: "If one believes that UFOs are nearby, there are countless natural and man-made objects that can take on quite unusual characteristics in the imagination of hopeful observers – especially when they appear at night. Their UFO reports, in turn, contribute to the general UFO hysteria, which leads other observers to see UFOs in all sorts of things. This situation escalates until the media loses interest in the topic, whereupon the UFOs promptly disappear."

Günter counters that one cannot generalize from isolated negative incidents. He uses the Belgium UFO case, with 141 independent witnesses and radar sightings, as an example of a well-documented event that shouldn't be dismissed as mass hysteria. He reiterates that the guideline is meant to caution against assuming all sightings are UFOs, not to dismiss all reports.

CENAP's Seventh Guideline: "When attempting to determine whether a UFO report is true or a hoax, a researcher should rely on material evidence, or the absence of such material traces where they should logically be present. They should by no means rely on general assessments of the character of the eyewitnesses involved in the case."

Günter interprets this as meaning that without concrete evidence like photos, spaceship parts, or an alien, a witness's testimony is not taken seriously. He sarcastically notes that everyone carries a camera and waits for UFOs. He argues that material evidence is crucial but must be considered in conjunction with eyewitness testimony, citing Allen Hynek's view that a photograph is only as credible as the photographer.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently adopts a critical yet engaged stance towards UFO research. It highlights the societal and media-driven skepticism that hinders serious investigation while also scrutinizing the methods and interpretations of UFO research organizations like CENAP. The editorial line appears to advocate for a more rigorous, evidence-based approach that doesn't dismiss eyewitness accounts outright but seeks to corroborate them with material evidence. There's a clear emphasis on distinguishing between genuine phenomena and hoaxes or misidentifications, and a critique of sensationalism in both media and some fringe research circles. The magazine aims to foster a more serious and informed public discourse on the UFO phenomenon.

'Der Ufo-Student' is a critical magazine for UFO research, presenting a debate and conflict within the German UFO research community. The issue focuses on the perceived skepticism and dismissiveness of the organization CENAP, particularly through its '10 UFO Research Principles,' and the reactions to these principles from other researchers and commentators.

Critique of CENAP and the '10 UFO Research Principles'

The magazine features commentary from 'Earthman (EM),' who criticizes CENAP's approach as an 'untrue insinuation' and highlights the significant difference between psychological cases and outright fraud. Earthman accuses CENAP of being composed of the 'best UFO researchers in the world' who 'show the amateurs how it's done' by doubting, denying, using flimsy arguments, concealing facts, defaming opponents, and lacking scientific background knowledge. He sarcastically notes that CENAP claims to be the 'only UFO research group that is precisely informed and knows the pure truth,' comparing it to the former 'Project Blue Book.'

Earthman argues that if CENAP's '8th Principle' (which states that a lack of sufficient information to definitively clarify a UFO report should not be taken as evidence for the hypothesis that Earth is visited by alien spacecraft) is not followed, one would have a cellar full of UFO evidence, as many cases must be closed due to insufficient data. He asserts that seeing such cases as proof is not only wrong but detrimental to UFO research, preventing the separation of wheat from chaff.

CENAP's '9th Principle' is also discussed, which suggests that if a light is observed at night and reported to a radar station that then searches for an unknown object, it's almost certain an 'unknown' object will be found. Conversely, if an unknown object appears on radar and is then sought out visually, a UFO will be 'sighted.' Earthman's commentary on this principle suggests that CENAP believes more corroborating sightings make a case less credible, especially if the object exhibits speeds and maneuvers defying physics. He questions how an object can be seen on radar if it isn't there, implying radar waves must reflect off something.

Hans-Werner Peiniger of GEP is quoted, noting that cases with both radar confirmation and visual sightings are extremely rare, and pure radar registrations are prone to numerous errors, thus requiring critical evaluation.

CENAP's '10th Principle' states that many UFO cases remain mysterious and unexplained because investigators have not thoroughly investigated them. Earthman counters this by questioning CENAP's own thoroughness and objectivity, suggesting their approach is superficial and biased. He criticizes CENAP's perceived arrogance and superiority, stating that their leader, Werner Walter, seems to believe CENAP is the ultimate authority in UFO research.

The magazine then presents a simplified summary of the 10 CENAP principles, rephrased as cynical commands: 'Pretend witnesses are stupid,' 'Doubt witnesses' perception and judgment,' 'Use media statements as a measure of truth,' 'Doubt people's abilities except your own,' 'Always see mass sightings as hysteria or optical illusions,' 'Any statement without clear proof is worthless,' 'Every UFO researcher who can provide proof of alien visitation is a fraud or incompetent,' 'Ignore physical laws if they contradict your views,' and 'Only you are the true UFO researcher.'

The Launch of 'Der UFO-Student' and Community Disputes

The article announces the upcoming launch of 'Der UFO-Student,' a critical UFO online magazine, on December 31st. It mentions that negative reactions from 'UFO fanatics' have already occurred, with some planning to publish corrections to Phil Klass's '10 UFO Theses' and using 'defamatory and insulting' language to discredit CENAP. A discussion forum on the 'Alien-de' server is mentioned as a place where these controversies are playing out, with pseudonymous users 'EARTHMAN' and 'STICKY' being highlighted.

CENAP-MV (Mecklenburg-Vorpommern) expresses support for the new magazine, hoping it will shift the balance within the UFO scene towards critical discourse. The timing of the launch, near the turn of the millennium, is seen as symbolic of renewed activity from the critical community.

Forum Discussions and Personal Attacks

Several forum posts are included, showing a heated exchange between 'Sticky,' 'erdman,' and others. 'Sticky' (presumably Stefan Stickler) defends his article 'Die 10 Gebote der CENAP,' stating it was intended to inform and allow for a counter-statement, not to be published in full without consent. He accuses 'Erdman' of generalizing and attacking the entire CENAP organization based on specific articles, like the 'Area 51' piece, which he claims was critical of specific individuals within CENAP rather than the whole group.

'Erdman' responds, questioning the timing of 'Sticky's' reaction and the nature of the 'UFO-Student' magazine, referring to it as a 'CENAP-GEP-Blatt' (a CENAP-GEP publication). He admits that his 'Area 51' article and CENAP's explanation of it were accurate.

'Sticky' clarifies that his article was indeed aimed at the entire CENAP, acknowledging that Werner Walter's statements in the CENAP-Report about 'spinners, messed-up existences, etc.' in the UFO scene were problematic. He also discusses the 'Veit-Familie' case, suggesting it was a UFO sect exploiting naive individuals. He notes that Werner Walter has become more open recently, possibly due to his article.

'Sticky' further argues that all UFO research is inherently subjective, and CENAP and its members are not exempt. He questions the claim of 'objective' investigation, stating that objectivity would require the possibility of extraterrestrial visitation, which he believes Werner Walter denies. He also argues that current scientific knowledge has limits and can be superseded, implying that rigid adherence to it might hinder UFO research.

He addresses common skeptical arguments, such as the lack of scientific proof for UFOs and aliens, comparing it to the historical lack of proof for a round Earth. He criticizes the demand for irrefutable proof, suggesting that acceptance depends on a willingness to acknowledge evidence rather than being bound by a pre-existing worldview. He also dismisses the idea that UFO believers are simply fanatics seeking a savior, stating that while many cases are explainable, about 10% remain unexplained and could indeed be UFOs, citing their unusual characteristics.

'Sticky' also defends the use of witness testimony, stating that while it's subjective, it's a necessary starting point, and physical evidence like photos and videos serve only to support it, not to stand alone. He criticizes the idea that 'Führer' (leader) is a term solely associated with negative historical figures, suggesting it can apply to various authority figures.

CENAP's Response and Defense

Christian Sommerer, from CENAP, provides a 'correction' to 'Sticky's' comments, calling it an 'excellent correction by Tino.' He states that the article by 'Sticky' was a reaction to statements in CENAP articles and not an unprovoked attack. He argues that CENAP should also be subject to criticism and should 'look at itself in the mirror' regarding personal attacks.

In a subsequent post, 'Sticky' responds to the idea that his article was a mere reaction, stating that it was written to prove that CENAP is not the ultimate authority and that they should also be mindful of their own personal attacks. He urges a thorough reading of the CENAP-Report to understand his motivations.

Further Discussion on UFO Research Methodology

Another section discusses the '10 Gebote' in relation to UFO research methodology. It is stated that the German UFO scene is characterized by 'kindergarten ufology,' with many individuals and sects making money through fraudulent means by altering or omitting facts. The concept of 'subjective evidence' is questioned, with a call for objective proof, such as identifying Venus as a stimulus in certain cases (V-1 cases).

It is argued that it will take a thousand years to fully understand the phenomenon, and Ufologists often assume their current worldview is wrong unless it aligns with their beliefs about aliens. While scientific knowledge evolves, certain facts are considered established. Skeptics are portrayed as cautious, not necessarily denying the possibility of UFOs but requiring proof to avoid being misled by false claims.

The article reiterates that not all UFO believers are fanatics, but it's important to remember that a UFO today might be an IFO (Identified Flying Object) tomorrow. Caution is advised against prematurely labeling phenomena as UFOs.

The '10 Gebote' are presented as useful for case investigation, potentially causing Ufologists to reconsider their most prized cases. The credibility of witnesses is not doubted, but potential weaknesses in their perception are considered. It is emphasized that photos and video recordings are only supplementary evidence and cannot stand alone.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the critique of overly skeptical UFO research organizations like CENAP, the defense of amateur researchers and witness testimony, and the promotion of a more open and critical discourse within the UFO community. The magazine positions itself as a platform for such critical examination, contrasting with what it perceives as dogmatic or dismissive approaches from some established groups. The editorial stance is clearly in favor of a more balanced and thorough investigation of UFO phenomena, acknowledging the complexities and subjective elements involved while still seeking credible evidence.

Title: Der Ufo-Student – Kritisches Magazin für UFO-Forschung
Issue: 1
Date: November 1999
Publisher: Not specified
Country: Germany
Language: German

This issue of 'Der Ufo-Student' is a critical magazine focused on UFO research, presenting a skeptical and analytical perspective on the phenomenon and its portrayal in the media.

Article: There is no business like UFO-Business

Author: Christian Sommerer

Introduction

Christian Sommerer's article, commissioned by Tino Günter of CENAP, aims to provide a critical platform for examining the UFO phenomenon, particularly its media representation. Sommerer emphasizes the importance of a socio-psychological approach to understanding how the media processes UFO-related topics. He notes that the UFO scene in Germany is often fragmented and not widely understood by the general public, and his essay seeks to bridge this gap by explaining the general systemic laws of modern media and their application to the UFO scene.

Media Today - Information Providers - Information Distorters?

Sommerer begins by defining a medium pragmatically as something that 'conveys information to the public.' He outlines a three-step process: medium, information, and the public. In the postmodern, globalizing society, there has been an 'explosion' of media, including traditional forms like newspapers, books, radio, and television, as well as newer forms like CD-ROMs, DVDs, and the internet. He highlights the role of major news agencies like AP, DPA, and Reuters in collecting and disseminating news, which is then selected and potentially commented upon by editorial offices. The challenge for the average consumer, like 'Hans Müller,' is verifying the authenticity of this information, as many parties have a hand in manipulating it.

Media Moguls and Advertising Bosses Keep the 'Media Whores' Running - 'Opinion Monopolization'

Sommerer argues that public opinion is largely manufactured by wealthy publishing house owners and private broadcasters. He points out that media positions in Germany, even in public broadcasting, are often decided based on party affiliation. He names media magnates like Hubert Burda and Leo Kirch as examples of influential figures. In the US, the media landscape is highly monopolized, with television dominated by three major networks: ABC, CBS, and NBC. A similar trend is observed in the former Soviet Union, with media mogul Berezovsky. Sommerer contends that Western societies are moving towards an 'information uniformity,' where quality is secondary to sensationalism and advertising revenue. This commercial drive also influences the UFO phenomenon, which is exploited for profit.

UFO and Paranormal Topics Generate Millions in Revenue - How Critics Are Silenced

Sommerer observes that new trends are quickly commercialized through intense marketing battles. He notes that a significant portion of the population prefers 'trivial literature' over complex works, making UFO themes, science fiction, and esoteric topics popular. He cites Erich von Däniken as a pioneer in this trend, followed by authors like Johannes von Buttlar, who popularized the UFO phenomenon in Germany. Many of these authors have become millionaires. The demand for sensational content leads to the invention of new themes, such as alien abductions, popularized by figures like Whitley Strieber. Authors like Dr. Johannes Fiebag have also achieved bestseller status. Publishers like 'Knaur' and 'Herbig-Verlag' profit from such topics, with books like 'UFO-Nahbegegnungen' achieving multiple print runs. Critical works, however, struggle to find publishers, as they are seen as potentially disrupting the lucrative 'UFO business.' Werner Walter recounts sending his critical UFO book to over a hundred publishers, all of whom refused, fearing it would spoil the profitable UFO market. Sommerer shares a similar experience, where a pro-UFO publisher admitted the UFO phenomenon was largely deception but continued to publish sensational UFO stories.

The 'Media Whores' of Private Television

Sommerer criticizes private television for its sensationalist approach to UFO topics, often presenting them in various formats, including daily talk shows. He notes that these shows often feature unbalanced audiences and lack genuine discussion. He cites the example of the talk show 'Vera,' which featured guests claiming alien abduction and UFO secrets, creating an environment where skeptics are outnumbered and marginalized. Tabloid magazines like 'Explosiv,' 'Extra,' and 'Blitz' are also criticized for their speculative and sensationalist reporting, using dramatic imagery and horror film music to create an impression of alien encounters. He mentions the use of special effects from films like 'Alien' to depict alien beings and spacecraft. The article also touches upon the German book market's embrace of esoteric themes since the 1970s, with authors like Erich von Däniken leading the way.

Public Broadcasting's Role and Censorship

Even public broadcasting is not immune to the sensationalism surrounding UFOs. Sommerer points to a program called 'MaxQ' on Bavarian Radio, which featured 'elite ufologists' like Illobrand von Ludwiger and Rolf-Dieter Klein from MUFON-CES. CENAP's protest against the program was unsuccessful. Sommerer alleges that Rolf-Dieter Klein may have been responsible for a retaliatory action of having his homepage URL temporarily blocked, possibly due to his work at Bavarian Radio and his computer expertise. He concludes that even publicly funded programs exhibit a lack of tolerance for criticism when UFO researchers hold editorial positions.

The UFO Phenomenon in the Media Landscape

Sommerer discusses how UFO topics are presented in various media formats. He criticizes daily talk shows for their lack of balanced discussion and the prevalence of sensational claims. He also points to tabloid magazines that exploit UFO themes with dramatic imagery and speculation. He notes that even when critical voices are present, they are often outnumbered and marginalized. The article highlights the reuse of old material and stories in new UFO programs, suggesting a lack of original research. The sensationalism surrounding UFOs is driven by the need for high ratings and advertising revenue, rather than a genuine desire to inform the public. The article also mentions the influence of American productions like 'The X-Files,' which blend reality and fiction, and the producer's claim that the stories are based on facts, which Sommerer deems a deliberate lie.

UFOs and Paranormal Themes Generate Millions

Sommerer reiterates that UFO and paranormal topics are highly profitable. He notes that publishers are more interested in sensational stories that sell well, even if they are based on deception. He mentions that critical UFO books struggle to find publishers, as they are seen as a threat to the lucrative UFO market. He shares his own experience of being rejected by a publisher who admitted the UFO phenomenon was largely a hoax but continued to publish sensational UFO stories.

The Australian UFO Incident in Guyra

The article reports on an event in Guyra, Australia, on December 9, 1999, where an object reportedly crashed into the local water reservoir. Initial reports from the Pro7 program 'taff' suggested a UFO crash. The incident involved the disruption of the reservoir, with authorities investigating the cause and potential contamination. Sky News also reported on the event, referring to a 'mysterious crater.' The article details the investigation, including the discovery of a 40 cm wide and deep 'tunnel' in the mud. It mentions that the RAAF (Royal Australian Air Force) had no exercises in the area at the time. An eyewitness claimed to have seen a blue 'shooting star' at a 45-degree angle. The incident was investigated by police and scientists, with initial findings suggesting it might be a meteorite. The article also mentions a local car dealer advertising 'Second Hand UFO Parts.'

Further Details on the Guyra Incident and Related Reports

John Auchtel of Phenomena Research Australia (PRA) visited Guyra and noted that the incident was handled as a routine police matter. He observed superficial burn marks and flattened reeds around the impact site, which did not resemble a typical space debris or meteorite impact. He suggested the possibility of a deliberate hoax or a misinterpretation of an unrelated event. Australian UFO researcher Bill Chalker reported that the media was having a 'field day' with the event, creating a 'circus atmosphere.' Reports of 'strange light activities' and unusual phenomena emerged. The article also mentions a claim by a 74-year-old man who reported seeing a 'strange light display' and experiencing radio interference and heat.

Meteorite Incident in Melbourne

On December 14, 1999, a report from Pro7 detailed a meteorite fragment that penetrated a bedroom window in Melbourne, Australia, narrowly missing a resident. The fragment, described as thumbnail-sized, caused a loud noise. Experts confirmed it was part of a meteorite traveling at high speeds.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine 'Der Ufo-Student' adopts a strongly critical and skeptical stance towards the UFO phenomenon and its media portrayal. Key themes include: the commercialization of UFO topics ('UFO-Business'), media manipulation and sensationalism, the silencing of critical voices, and the distinction between genuine investigation and profitable exploitation. The editorial stance is one of promoting critical thinking and informed skepticism, urging readers to question media narratives and to seek out reliable information rather than accepting sensational claims uncritically. The magazine aims to provide a platform for in-depth analysis and cultural critique of the UFO phenomenon and its societal impact.

Title: Der Ufo-Student – Kritisches Magazin für UFO-Forschung

Issue Date: December 1999

Content Focus: This issue of "Der Ufo-Student" critically examines a widely reported sighting of a 'sparkling object' over Northern Germany and Denmark on December 20, 1999. It delves into witness accounts, expert opinions, and media coverage, while also featuring an interview with prominent UFO skeptic Robert Sheaffer.

Germany/Denmark: Sparkling Object in the Evening Sky

The main article details the events of December 20, 1999, when a bright, sparkling object was observed over Northern Germany and Denmark. The sighting, initially reported by dpa as a 'sparkling, meteor-like object', led to numerous concerned calls to airports in Hamburg, Bremen, and Kiel. Witnesses described a silent, flying object with a bright trail, moving from North to South. Airport spokespersons, like Clemens Finkbeiner-Dege, definitively ruled out it being an aircraft, and radar screens showed no movement. The German Weather Service could not provide an explanation as their radar does not track such phenomena.

Simultaneously, the internal CENAP email list received a report from Danish UFO researcher Ole Henningsen about a similar sighting in Denmark at 8:13 PM. Henningsen himself witnessed the object from his car on the island of Lolland, describing it as a 'rocket-like orange phenomenon' moving flatly across the western sky at a low altitude, appearing to be only 1-2 km away. The SUFOI (Scandinavian UFO Information) at the Tycho Brahe Planetarium in Copenhagen received 30 calls about the 'UFO'. Air traffic controller Lars-Ake Hedin at Kastrup Airport described seeing a bright light, similar to the afterburner of a fighter jet, moving parallel to the horizon at high speed (estimated at 3000-4000 km/h) for about 10 seconds.

The phenomenon was reported on Danish television (DR1) by 9:25 PM. While Henningsen initially considered it a meteor, he acknowledged the impressive appearance and the 'suggestion/illusion' of proximity. The Aarhus Planetarium also received about 30 reports, with Ole J. Knudsen suggesting it might be a re-entry object from a Titan rocket launched from Vandenberg, USA.

Further reports emerged, including from the Goeteborg airfield in Sweden, where pilots observed a luminous sphere moving at high speed. The incident was also reported to the VdS (Association of Friends of Stars) and the German Fireball Network. The CENAP email list served as an effective communication tool for researchers.

Media coverage escalated, with Pro7 and ARD featuring the event on their videotext pages. RTL Nord interviewed witnesses, and their magazine show 'Punkt 12' reported on the 'fireball in the sky', with the moderator mentioning that people in Northern Germany watched the phenomenon for 20 minutes. A preview showed a 'comet-like' trail captured on camera, possibly from a moving car.

Witnesses like Helmut Treder described a bright point in the northwest, initially thought to be an aircraft, but it grew larger and emitted a fiery trail with breaking rock fragments. A map indicated the fireball's trajectory potentially covering Norway, Sweden, Denmark, and Northern Germany. The Hamburg airport spokesperson reiterated his earlier statement, comparing the event to the 'Niedersachsen-Boliden' from November 8th. Björn Voss from the Kiel Planetarium suggested it was likely a shooting star or a small piece of space debris.

Andre Knöfel noted that the sighting zone was too large for a typical bolide and the duration up to 50 seconds, leaning towards a re-entry object. Bundeswehr officer Jürgen Stiehler, on his way to the Bundeswehr University in Hamburg, observed a similar phenomenon around 8:10 PM, initially thinking it was a 'New Year's rocket' with an orange exhaust, but then seeing 'flaked metal shavings' and small luminous specks. He also described a flat trajectory and a tail, estimating the observation lasted 15-20 seconds and concluding it was a re-entry.

Additional reports from amateur astronomers included Jürgen Meyer observing a 'dark orange luminous body with three short tails' and Ulrich Uffrecht seeing an 'orange-glowing object' moving slowly from North to South with a trail of glowing particles. Sascha Mittasch and a group observed an oval, deep orange to light yellow object with a tail, visible for over 50 seconds, emitting extreme brightness and shedding fragments.

Experts like Detlef Alwes from the German Aerospace Center suggested it could be a 'fireball burning up', possibly caused by 'color particles from satellites'. The RTL 'Punkt 12' preview film was later shown on Pro7's 's.a.m.' program, but it was identified as a film from Colombia, possibly a hoax. Astronomer William Cepeda preferred to call it an 'atmospheric phenomenon' rather than a UFO to avoid misinterpretations.

Robert H. McNaught suggested the film showed a 'plane contrail in twilight', and noted that similar contrail phenomena in Shanghai and Beijing had led to UFO alarms. The article also mentions a possible re-entry of a US Titan 2 rocket stage from Vandenberg, launched on June 20th, 1999.

Astronom Alan Pickup confirmed that the rocket stage likely entered the atmosphere over the sea north of Norway around 6:10 PM UT (8:10 PM CET) and burned up over the sea, passing towards Stockholm, Sweden, and then south towards Germany. Swedish newspaper DN reported similar sightings in western Sweden the previous night. The phenomenon was described as a 'smoke trail' in Uppsala, but otherwise, no persistent trail was observed. The DN also concluded it was the re-entry of a Titan rocket stage.

German television coverage varied. ZDF's 'Hallo Deutschland' featured 'an inexplicable phenomenon', with witnesses describing it as 'comet-like' and not sinking or fading. Radio Schleswig-Holstein received numerous calls, with one reporter comparing it to a signal rocket. Planetarium Kiel's Björn Voss revised his earlier explanation of a shooting star to a re-entry object. Sat1 reported it as a shooting star, while N3-Dass! called it a comet. RTL-Aktuell linked it to the Catskill-Boliden, suggesting 'returning space debris' as the most likely solution, citing the absence of a meteor impact crater.

The article emphasizes the utility of the internet and email for UFO research, enabling decentralized coordination and timely information flow. It stresses the importance of investigating UFO reports thoroughly.

The Internet as a Tool for UFO Research

The article highlights the internet as a crucial instrument for UFO research, enabling faster and more efficient communication than traditional methods like phone calls, letters, and faxes. The CENAP forum and UFO-Newsticker users were particularly well-informed due to their ability to pose relevant questions to experts. The author notes that even experienced individuals were taken aback by the phenomenon, underscoring the need for caution when relying on witness testimony, even from professionals like police officers or pilots.

The European UFO Scene and Skepticism

Martin Kottmeyer's description of the UFO movement as a 'system of evolving paranoia' is presented. The author observes that with each passing year, the phenomenon becomes more 'crazy'. In the 1960s, NICAP refused to investigate cases involving sightings of aliens, labeling them 'kook lines'. However, this distinction has blurred over the years, with many UFO groups now accepting claims of alien abduction and implantation without question.

The article touches upon the societal context of UFO beliefs, suggesting that UFOs can serve as a form of escapism or a way to find meaning in life, especially in societies governed by harsh economic rules. The difficulty many people have in distinguishing between what they want to be true and what is demonstrably true is also mentioned.

Interview with Robert Sheaffer

The issue features an interview with Robert Sheaffer, a prominent US critic and skeptic of UFO phenomena, often labeled a 'debunker'. Sheaffer, described as a multifaceted intellectual, is active in the skeptical organization CSICOP, critiques general societal issues, works as an engineer in Silicon Valley, and is also a classical tenor.

Sheaffer recounts his initial interest in UFOs stemming from childhood reading of sensationalist books, but his later realization that many UFO claims were inaccurate led him to publicly challenge such information. He notes that while UFO researchers often revere figures like Phil Klass, they also tend to hate skeptics, sometimes resorting to threats and hostility.

Sheaffer discusses his interactions with UFO believers, stating that they often exhibit deep-seated personal animosity towards skeptics. He explains that for some, challenging their beliefs is akin to taking away their most cherished possession. He also mentions that many UFO investigators combine their UFO research with broader critiques of society, seeing UFOs as a phenomenon that thrives in capitalist states.

Regarding his own books, including "The Making of the Messiah," which offers a critical perspective on Christianity, Sheaffer acknowledges that such work can provoke negative reactions. He observes that most people ignore books that challenge their existing beliefs, whether they are UFO believers or religious adherents. He quotes Nietzsche's definition of 'belief' as 'not wanting to know' the truth, applying it to both ufologists and religious followers.

Sheaffer believes that UFOs are often sought as a form of entertainment and escapism, a way to make life more interesting by imagining a universe filled with unknown phenomena. He points out the difficulty people have in differentiating between wishful thinking and demonstrable reality, leading to a wide array of irrational beliefs.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue of "Der Ufo-Student" adopts a critical and skeptical stance towards UFO phenomena. It emphasizes the importance of rigorous investigation, data collection, and information management. The magazine highlights how the internet can be a valuable tool for UFO research when used effectively for coordination and information dissemination. The editorial stance is clearly against sensationalism and uncritical acceptance of witness testimony, advocating for a rational and evidence-based approach to understanding unusual aerial phenomena. The interview with Robert Sheaffer reinforces this critical perspective, showcasing the arguments and experiences of a leading UFO skeptic.

'Der Ufo-Student' is a critical magazine for UFO research that appears quarterly on a non-commercial basis. This issue, dated November 1999, features a range of articles, news items, and an interview with prominent skeptic Robert Sheaffer.

Interview with Robert Sheaffer

The magazine presents an interview with Robert Sheaffer, described as a skeptic and a member of Mensa. The interview touches upon his critical stance on UFO phenomena, his broad interests beyond skepticism, and his surprising talent as a tenor singer. Sheaffer shares his experiences singing in regional opera companies in California, mentioning roles in 'La Traviata' and 'Rigoletto,' and expresses a desire to perform Wagner and Richard Strauss in the future, noting the greater prevalence of their works in German opera houses.

Sheaffer also offers his perspective on paranormal beliefs and irrational convictions, suggesting they are similar in Europe and North America, though with different emphases. He contrasts concerns about nuclear energy versus genetically modified food in these regions. He critically examines certain claims made by dogmatic feminists in North America, such as the existence of an archaic matriarchy and the suppression of memories of sexual assault, suggesting Europeans are more realistic on these topics. He also observes that North America seems more prone to taking creationism seriously and appears more religious on average compared to Europeans. Conversely, he notes that socialism was more popular in Europe, potentially retarding its economies and high-tech development, which has now shifted to North America.

UFO-News and Developments

SETI@home Project

The magazine highlights the SETI@home project, which allows individuals to contribute to the search for extraterrestrial intelligence using their home PCs. The program analyzes data downloaded from the internet as a screensaver.

Forum Parawissenschaften Receives Association Status

The Forum Parawissenschaften has been officially registered as an association (e.V.) since July 17, 1999, and has launched a new homepage.

UFO Hysteria Abates

The anticipated UFO hysteria surrounding the solar eclipse on August 11, 1999, did not occur, disappointing doomsday prophets.

Independent Alien Network Dissolved

The Independent Alien Network (IAN) was dissolved on September 1, 1999. In its wake, former IAN members, including Chris Dimperl, founded the German UFO Research Association (GUFORA). Additionally, a new UFO group called Evidencia formed in Berlin, and the Deutsche UFO-Netzwerk (D.U.N.) emerged, with former IAN leader Wladilaw Raab involved.

Helmut Lammer's Accusations against MUFON-CES

Dr. Helmut Lammer, a former member, has made serious accusations against Illobrand von Ludwiger and the methods of MUFON-CES. Lammer alleges that von Ludwiger deliberately withholds facts and employs occult practices rather than scientific approaches in UFO research.

In Memoriam: Johannes Fiebag

The magazine notes the passing of Johannes Fiebag, a UFO abduction researcher, who died of cancer on October 11, 1999. 'Der Ufo-Student' extends its condolences.

Illobrand von Ludwiger on 'MaxQ'

Illobrand von Ludwiger, described as an 'astro-physicist' and leader of MUFON-CES, appeared on the 'Lust auf Wissen' program 'MaxQ' on October 17. The segment, which also featured his computer expert Rolf-Dieter Klein, was met with protests from skeptics and was characterized as 'clownish' by the magazine.

German UFO Researcher Conference

The annual conference of German UFO researchers, themed 'The UFO Encounter,' took place in Cröffelbach near Schwäbisch Hall at the end of October. The event was intended to bring together pro- and contra-organizations, but was largely attended by skeptics, preventing direct confrontation of opinions. A list of attendees is provided, including representatives from GEP, CENAP, ALIEN.DE, FGK, VdS, and SOS OVNI.

E.T. - Online UFO Magazine Launches

The electronic UFO magazine 'E.T.' was launched on November 1, 1999. Its editor-in-chief, Dennis Kirstein, emphasized its commitment to presenting both pro and contra viewpoints. With over 100 subscribers receiving the free magazine via email, 'E.T.' is considered a rising publication.

Uriella and Icordo Exposed on Talk Shows

Uriella and her husband Icordo, associated with the UFO sect Fiat Lux, appeared on the 'Hans Meiser' talk show on October 26, 1999. The segment, initially focused on Icordo's entry into the local council, became confrontational as criticism mounted. When Meiser attempted to moderate, and Icordo became overbearing, the couple left the show abruptly, particularly after a former Fiat Lux member spoke out. They faced a similar challenge on the RTL show 'Sabrina,' where Icordo was asked to provide proof of his anti-materialistic stance, and reluctantly gave up his expensive wristwatch for charity, only to discover cameras were still rolling, later revealing in a broadcast on November 29, 1999, that Fiat Lux was indeed concerned with material possessions.

New CENAP Homepage

The Central Erforschungs-Netz außergewöhnlicher Himmelsphänomene (CENAP) has launched a new version of its homepage at www.alien.de/cenap. Following the departure of the former webmaster, Josef Schedel, the site is now under the management of Tino Günter.

UFO Alarm Over Northern Germany and Denmark

A DPA report from December 20, 1999, described a bright, meteor-like object with a tail observed over Northern Germany and Denmark, causing numerous calls to airports. While some pilots reported similar sightings, and the weather radar could not detect it, airport spokespersons and observers, including colleague Ole Henningsen, identified the object as likely a meteor.

Reader Contributions

The magazine encourages readers to submit news and information about the UFO scene to [email protected].

Impressum and Editorial Information

The 'Impressum' section details that 'Der Ufo-Student' is published quarterly on a non-commercial basis. It states that marked contributions do not necessarily reflect the editorial stance, and the magazine is not liable for unsolicited manuscripts or photos. The editorial address is provided, along with contact information for the editor-in-chief, Tino Günter, and editors Christian Sommerer and Werner Walter. Free contributors are also listed. The magazine is distributed via www.ufo-student.de. Support for 'Der Ufo-Student' comes from various organizations, including CENAP, GEP, VfgP, and GWUP, as well as the electronic magazine 'E.T.' The section also includes a legal disclaimer regarding external links, stating that 'Der Ufo-Student' explicitly distances itself from the content of linked external websites.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue of 'Der Ufo-Student' demonstrates a clear editorial stance favoring critical examination and skepticism within the field of UFO research. The interview with Robert Sheaffer, a known skeptic, sets a tone of rational inquiry. The magazine actively reports on UFO research organizations, both those promoting investigation and those facing criticism, such as MUFON-CES. The inclusion of news about the dissolution of IAN and the formation of new groups highlights the dynamic and sometimes contentious nature of the UFO community. The magazine also addresses public perception and media portrayals of UFO phenomena, as seen in the coverage of the Fiat Lux sect's public appearances. Overall, 'Der Ufo-Student' appears committed to providing a platform for diverse viewpoints while maintaining a critical and evidence-based approach to the subject matter.