UFO Sighter Vol 5 No 2

Magazine Overview

Title: UFO SIGHTER
Issue: VOLUME FIVE NUMBER TWO
Date: SPRING 1966
Publisher: Allen H. Greenfield
Type: Magazine Issue

Editorial: What Can an Individual Do?

The editorial section, written by Editor & Publisher Allen H. Greenfield, addresses the magazine's upcoming format changes, which include a more professional design, new columns, and a revised staff, with the goal of achieving high intellectual and literary standards. Greenfield acknowledges that publishing the magazine is largely an individual effort, though he has received help over the years. He expresses a desire for the magazine to reach a high level among semi-professional publications, starting with the Summer 1966 issue.

A central theme of the editorial is the question of what an individual can do in the UFO field. Greenfield disagrees with the notion that supporting a large UFO organization is the best course of action, citing a lack of substantial progress in the field despite the existence of various groups. He argues that original and resourceful effort is more valuable and that a sense of apathy could engulf the field, leading to stagnation and "wild" speculations. He also notes a perceived lack of communication between UFOlogy "leaders" and "rank and file members." While admitting he doesn't have all the answers, Greenfield commits to seeking solutions.

The editorial also announces that the new UFO Sighter format will aim for a serious and straightforward approach to the "saucer enigma," including a regular column on developing UFO theories.

Letter to the Editor

This section features a letter from Eugene R. Steinberg, responding to criticisms from Mr. Earley regarding an article on NICAP. Steinberg contends that Earley's criticisms miss the mark and distort facts. He confirms that Richard Hall was promoted to "Assistant Director" of NICAP in December-January 1963-4, and that the "Acting Director" role was not merely an intra-office discussion. Steinberg questions when Hall was officially promoted, as it was not announced by Major Keyhoe or the NICAP Board of Governors, suggesting Hall took the position without permission.

Steinberg also addresses Earley's attempt to link his own promotion to Managing Editor of SAUCER NEWS with the discussion, stating it is irrelevant, as his promotion was formally announced. He criticizes Hall's current role in NICAP, suggesting Hall runs the office and implements policy while Major Keyhoe primarily makes appearances and edits "The UFO Investigator." Steinberg believes Hall, as the most powerful officer, is responsible for NICAP's shortcomings.

Regarding the "space pancake" incident, Steinberg states that Earley ignored his points. He argues that NICAP should have acknowledged receipt of the "pancake" and affirmed their intention to analyze it to demonstrate objectivity, which he questions they have done. Steinberg also defends his article on NICAP, asserting it was truthful and conformed to the Code of Ethics enacted at the 2nd Congress of Scientific UFOlogists, which he notes has not been endorsed by NICAP officials.

In a final note, Steinberg discusses his reference to Hall's "pointed" finger, explaining it was based on a witness's testimony. He also comments on Comella's views, suggesting they merit careful consideration as Comella "may be on to something," even if his UFO "framework" is not entirely accurate.

Editor's Say

Allen H. Greenfield addresses the publication of Major Keyhoe's photo on the cover in connection with Mr. Steinberg's article on NICAP. Greenfield apologizes to Major Keyhoe if he felt his privacy was invaded, explaining that the photos were taken openly and that the image served as an historic document related to Steinberg's article.

Greenfield reiterates the magazine's commitment to improvement, urging readers to provide feedback. He announces a policy of uniform mailing, possibly in manila envelopes, which will increase costs. Consequently, subscription rates are rising to $2.00 for four issues, effective August 1st, 1966. He encourages current subscribers to renew before this date at the old rate of $1.00 for four issues to save money.

Changes are also being made to the letter policy to ensure faithful reproduction of writers' ideas and prevent accidental misrepresentation. New guidelines for submitting letters are provided, requiring explicit permission to publish and offering prior notification for any edits.

Greenfield notes that this issue is short and transitional, apologizing for the lateness of the previous issue and explaining that the "deadline" has been moved up by approximately one month, with the publication schedule now set for February, May, August, and November.

He announces staff changes, thanking the outgoing "old staff." Greenfield will remain as Editor, Eugene Steinberg will be the Associate Editor, and Lucius Farish will be the new Contributing Editor.

UFO Sighter Reader Poll

A reader poll is included, soliciting feedback on various aspects of the magazine and the UFO field. Questions cover satisfaction with the magazine's format, opinions on the announced changes, condition of delivered issues, favorite columns, and suggestions for improvement. It also asks for opinions on valuable UFO publications and organizations, thoughts on the annual Congress of Scientific UFOlogists in Cleveland, and plans for attending the convention. Additionally, readers are asked for their theories on the causes of "unknown" UFO reports, their comments on the importance of the UFO problem, and whether they have ever seen a UFO. Finally, readers are asked to provide their name, address, occupation, and permission to use their information for future articles and research.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the evolution and professionalization of UFO publications, the role of the individual versus organizations in UFO research, and critical examination of UFO organizations like NICAP. The editorial stance emphasizes a commitment to objective reporting, intellectual rigor, and open communication with readers, while also acknowledging the complexities and uncertainties within the UFO mystery. The magazine is positioning itself as a serious platform for UFO research and discussion.