UFO Review - Issue 17

Magazine Overview

Title: UFO REVIEW
Issue: Number 17
Date: August/September/October and probably bits of November 2006
Edition: SPECIAL BAD TASTE EDITION!!!!!

This issue of UFO REVIEW adopts a highly satirical and humorous tone, particularly evident on the cover with its 'Bad Taste Edition' label and irreverent commentary on Tim Good's new book. The magazine features a mix of interviews, articles, and book reviews, all presented with a critical and often witty perspective on the field of ufology.

Cover Features

The cover is a collage of images, including politicians and religious figures, accompanied by humorous captions. The central focus is Timothy Good's book, "Need to Know: UFOs, The Military and Intelligence," prominently displayed with a "40% off" sticker. The overall impression is one of playful mockery and a departure from serious ufological discourse.

In This Issue

"Your Editor trills New Sunrise Very Slowly Dawning" (Page 3)

This editorial piece reflects on the aging demographic within ufology, suggesting that the 'stalwarts' are reaching the end of their careers. The author calls for younger voices to emerge and acknowledges the PR aspect of ufology alongside research. It introduces Paul Kimball as the subject of the main interview and mentions other emerging figures in the field like Mac Tonnies, William Wise, Greg Bishop, Robert Zimmerman, and Nick Redfern. The piece notes that ufology is in a slump but is regrouping and reinventing itself.

"I Like Dick - Interview with Ufological Documentary film maker Paul Kimball" (Pages 3-10)

This is the most substantial article in the issue, a lengthy interview with Paul Kimball, a documentary filmmaker from Halifax, Nova Scotia. The interview covers:

• Background: Kimball discusses his upbringing, his father's career as a judge, and his mother's background in the military and banking. He holds an undergraduate degree in history from Acadia University and a law degree from Dalhousie University, with a partial Master's in history.
• Legal Career: He technically practiced law for only 12 days before moving into the music industry. He won an award for family law and took eclectic courses, including Admiralty law, but admits to getting a 'D' in property law.
• Police Experience: He served as a special constable with the RCMP for four months in the summer of 1990, describing it as a valuable learning experience, particularly for criminal law.
• Music Career: Kimball has always loved music and played the ukulele from a young age. He was in two bands, "Tall Poppies" and "Julia's Rain," and considers himself to have been close to becoming Canada's next Paul McCartney. He notes that while he wrote songs, he couldn't sing them.
• Filmmaking: He has made documentaries on ufological matters, including "Fields of Fear" about cattle mutilations. He runs a film production company and has a high-profile blog.
• Ufology Views: Kimball is described as a controversial figure, known for holding strong opinions and a knack for drawing out strong reactions. His political leanings, particularly his support for George Bush, are noted as being contrary to the general trend in ufology. The interview probes his Ufological views and opinions, suggesting it will change readers' perceptions of him.
• Contradictions: The author notes Kimball's contradictions, describing him as a "devilish bastard" who is both vain and self-obsessed, yet also sensitive and insightful. He is seen as an argument against the theory that North Americans are ignorant of global affairs.

"Application To Be Featured On The Internationally Renown UFO Watchdog Web Site (I want to be famous)" (Page 48)

This appears to be a brief mention or title for a section, likely related to submissions or features on a UFO watchdog website.

"Interview With Chris Coote" (Page 49)

Chris Coote is introduced as the principal Radar Operator for the MoD at Eskmeals in Cumbria for 15 years. His work involved the collection, manipulation, and archival storage of sensitive positional data.

"Tim Good Speaks" (Page 54)

This section title indicates a contribution from Tim Good, likely related to his new book.

"THE VOYNICH MANUSCRIPT AND THE KOLBRIN BIBLE By KITHRA" (Page 55)

This article by Kithra compares and contrasts the Voynich Manuscript (accepted as genuine) and the Kolbrin Bible (considered possibly a fake). The author notes that neither text is widely known and the only similarity is the "compare and contrast" framing.

"The Whit and Wisdom of CRAP" (Page 63)

This section title suggests a critical or humorous take on ufology-related content.

"Book Reviews Are Back" (Pages 63-65)

• This section features reviews of several books:
• "The Universe Wants To Play" (Anomalist 12 Various authors)
• "Abducted: How People Come to Believe They Were Kidnapped by Aliens" by Clancy (described as a "belated and utterly filthy and unnecessary review")
• "An American Demonology: Flying Saucers Over the White House" by Colin Bennett (described as a "marvellous tome")

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The dominant theme in this issue is a critical and often satirical examination of ufology. The "Bad Taste Edition" label and the humorous commentary on Tim Good's book set a tone of irreverence. The interview with Paul Kimball, while in-depth, also highlights the controversial and sometimes divisive nature of individuals within the field. The editorial piece reflects a concern about the aging demographic and the need for new perspectives. The reviews of books also suggest a critical editorial stance, with one review being particularly harsh. The magazine appears to embrace a skeptical yet engaged approach to ufology, using humor and sharp commentary to dissect its subject matter.

This issue of the magazine features an in-depth interview with a musician and filmmaker, referred to as 'Paul', discussing his career path, his interest in ufology, and his experiences in the music and film industries. The content spans discussions from his early music days to his current documentary work.

Music Career and Industry

Paul recounts his experiences with his band, The Tall Poppies, and their performance at an East Coast Music Awards showcase in 1995. He mentions Halifax being a significant music hub in the 90s. A pivotal moment discussed is turning down a record deal with a major label. Paul attributes this decision to "hubris," believing he could secure a better deal, and also a dislike for the A&R representative. He reflects that this decision might have led to a different career trajectory, possibly with moderate success, but he ultimately doesn't regret it, stating he is happy with where he is now. He also touches on the band's break-up and his subsequent decision to pursue other avenues rather than trying to replicate the success of artists like Paul McCartney.

Transition to Filmmaking

The interview details Paul's unexpected entry into filmmaking. He explains that after his music career didn't pan out as hoped, he stumbled into film. He initially took a temporary job with Salter Street Films, a production company in Halifax, to help with applications. This led to a position as a program administrator at the Nova Scotia Film Development Corporation, a Crown agency that funded film and television projects. Paul describes how he was encouraged to direct a documentary about Stan Friedman, despite initial reservations about his directorial capabilities. He emphasizes that his approach to filmmaking, particularly documentaries, involves telling a story, knowing the material, and having passion for the subject, rather than necessarily technical expertise.

Paul highlights several documentaries he has directed or produced, including one about Stan Friedman, which he is proud of due to a good budget and the subject matter. He also discusses the "Aztec" and "MJ12" films, noting their lower production values due to budget constraints. He expresses regret about making the MJ12 film, feeling conflicted about potentially undermining Stan Friedman's long-held beliefs on the subject. He believes a documentary filmmaker should always be free to be completely honest.

He also mentions other projects, such as the classical music series "Synchronicity" about pianist Heather Schmidt and cellist Shauna Rolston, and "The Colours of Exile," a film about a Palestinian artist. Paul expresses pride in the classical music series, particularly its second season, for its quality and for showcasing Canadian musicians on a limited budget.

Ufology and Personal Philosophy

A significant portion of the interview is dedicated to Paul's interest in ufology, which he attributes largely to his uncle, Stan Friedman, a prominent ufologist. He recalls Stan discussing UFOs at family reunions, sparking his initial interest. His interest grew after making his first film on UFOs and meeting other figures in the field like Barry Downing, Kevin Randle, and Karl Pflock. Paul views his legal training as beneficial to his approach to ufology, enabling him to examine evidence and ask probing questions.

Regarding the MJ12 documents, Paul is firm in his belief that they are a hoax, stating, "Big fraud." While he doesn't definitively attribute them to Rick Doty, he considers it his suspicion and the most logical explanation. He maintains an open mind about Roswell but finds it less interesting now. He also discusses his personal philosophy, emphasizing self-reliance and learning from experiences, drawing on his mother's sayings about not being bored and making one's own way.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The interview reveals a recurring theme of career transitions and embracing opportunities as they arise, with Paul describing himself as someone who "stumbles into" things. The magazine appears to have an interest in ufology, music, and Canadian culture, as evidenced by the subjects covered. The editorial stance seems to be one of exploring diverse career paths and the personal journeys of individuals within these fields, with a particular focus on individuals with connections to ufology.

This issue of "UFO Trail" (Volume 1, Issue 24, dated September 2005) features an in-depth interview with filmmaker Paul Kimball. The magazine, published in the USA, focuses on UFOs and related phenomena.

Interview with Paul Kimball

The interview, conducted by "SM" (presumably the magazine's editor), delves into Kimball's experiences and perspectives as a documentary filmmaker specializing in UFO topics. Kimball expresses regret over narrating his film "The Drowning of Alfred Lehmberg," feeling it compromised his objectivity, though he stands by the overall content.

Kimball discusses his current project, "The Top 10 UFO Cases," noting that while most ufologists have been supportive, some have refused to participate. He attributes these refusals to jealousy or disagreements with the film's premise. He specifically mentions Jerry Clark and Jan Aldrich as ufologists who declined to provide a "top 10" list.

Kimball emphasizes that television networks prioritize entertainment, but believes filmmakers can and should also inform. He contrasts his approach with what he perceives as "schlock jobs" in the UFO documentary genre. He encourages viewers to research cases further after watching his films, suggesting that television can serve as a gateway to deeper investigation.

Criticism of Ufologists and Media Practices

Kimball is critical of some ufologists who he feels make it difficult for the field by misrepresenting cases or individuals. He uses the example of Wilbert Smith, arguing that Smith's credibility is questionable due to his status as a 'contactee,' and that those who defend him are intellectually dishonest. He contrasts this with how figures like Bob Lazar are treated, suggesting a double standard.

He also addresses the concept of "hucksters" in ufology, distinguishing between those who genuinely believe their subject matter (like Stan Friedman, whom he defends despite acknowledging he makes money from UFOs) and those who exploit it for personal gain. He names Steven Greer as someone he considers a huckster or someone with a detached grasp of reality.

Kimball expresses a strong dislike for Jeff Rense and his show, but maintains that Rense should be allowed to air his views, advocating for open criticism rather than censorship. He applies a similar principle to Michael Salla, stating he will criticize Salla's methodology if he believes it to be flawed.

Methodology and Credibility

Kimball is particularly critical of the "Exopolitics" community, finding their claims of rigorous methodology to be bunk. He argues that their beliefs drive their research rather than a sound scientific or historical approach. He uses the example of Bob Lazar, stating that claims of erased records are ludicrous and that witness testimony, while important, can be tainted by unreliable individuals.

He advocates for focusing on strong cases and credible witnesses, citing examples like Kelly Johnson and Lincoln La Paz. He believes that the field made a mistake by focusing too heavily on crashed saucers and alien abductions 25 years ago, potentially diverting attention from more substantive research.

Government and UFOs

Regarding government involvement, Kimball disagrees with the notion of a monolithic, purposefully lying government. Instead, he believes certain elements within government agencies, such as the Air Force or intelligence agencies, may withhold information for their own reasons, often to avoid admitting ignorance about UFOs or as standard operating procedure. He dismisses the idea of a "Cosmic Watergate" related to NSA document redactions, explaining it as typical bureaucratic practice.

He believes that while Congress might eventually consider the subject, it's not necessarily the path for those who don't believe in a massive government conspiracy, as they view the government as the antagonist.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The issue strongly reflects an editorial stance that values critical thinking, rigorous research, and a balanced approach to ufology. It champions the idea that while entertainment has a role in documentaries, it should not overshadow factual reporting. The magazine appears to be critical of unsubstantiated claims and those who, in its view, damage the credibility of the UFO field through poor methodology or questionable personal conduct. There's a clear emphasis on distinguishing between genuine belief and exploitation, and on the importance of discerning credible evidence and witnesses. The magazine encourages open debate and criticism as a means of advancing the study of UFO phenomena.

This issue of UFO Magazine, identified as issue 31, features a discussion primarily between two individuals, PK and SM, exploring various facets of ufology, scientific inquiry, and government involvement.

Government Funding and Scientific Study

PK argues that government money is essential for a legitimate scientific study into UFO phenomena, as governments possess the necessary resources. He contrasts this with reliance on individual benefactors, citing the potential for predetermined slants. PK emphasizes the need for accountability, suggesting that government studies, like a hypothetical Condon project without Edward Condon's influence, should be public and transparent, even if the results are negative. The goal is a real scientific inquiry, not a whitewash.

Scientific Openness and Skepticism

PK expresses admiration for scientists like David Grinspoon who are open to possibilities. Grinspoon, despite being skeptical of UFOs and ufology, believes that science should investigate mysteries to learn from them, even if the explanation isn't alien. Peter Sturrock's panel is mentioned as an example where ufologists presented cases, and scientists, while unconvinced of aliens, acknowledged that there was something interesting worth exploring. The discussion highlights that science can learn from unexplained phenomena, regardless of their origin (aliens or extra-dimensional).

SETI vs. Ufology

PK notes that ufology is sometimes jealous of SETI (Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence) due to SETI's public visibility and success in securing funding. He acknowledges SETI's effectiveness in raising public awareness about the possibility of extraterrestrial life, contrasting it with ufology's struggle to gain public recognition for its researchers. PK suggests that ufology's focus on unscientific topics like crashed saucers and alien abductions has hindered its credibility with science.

Reorienting Ufology

PK proposes that ufology needs to re-evaluate its direction, suggesting a 'U-turn' to retrace steps and take a different path. He believes ufology has become too focused on 'far out' aspects like alien abductions and Exopolitics, which he considers the public persona of ufology. He advocates for a more grounded approach, suggesting that if ufology were to reverse course and take a more scientific path, it could lead to greater acceptance.

Science's Role and Limitations

PK asserts that science can measure anomalous phenomena in the sky, similar to measuring cloud formations. He believes science has a place in understanding UFOs, not just by finding them, but by exploring the theoretical elements. He suggests bringing in scientists like Michio Kaku or Jacques Vallee to discuss physics and flying saucers, focusing on the scientific aspects rather than sensational topics.

The Extraterrestrial Hypothesis (ETH)

PK discusses the ETH, stating that while he believes it's a valid hypothesis, he cannot prove it beyond a reasonable doubt. He contrasts his view with that of Stan, who he believes sees the evidence as proof of alien visitation. PK emphasizes that a rigorous investigation requires constructing a timeline and examining all evidence, using the Lonnie Zamora case in Socorro as an example of an investigation that could have been more thorough. He believes that while UFOs (or Unidentified Aerial Phenomena - UAP) are real, the evidence does not conclusively prove alien visitation.

Trace Evidence and Witness Testimony

Regarding trace evidence like tripod markings or burnt bushes, PK questions whether these are definitively evidence of alien craft, suggesting they could be terrestrial in origin, such as test craft from military installations. He acknowledges that witness testimony is important but stresses the need for careful investigation, akin to a criminal case, to establish facts and avoid bias. He notes that while some ufologists dismiss the Socorro case, others consider it the best on record.

The Challenge of Proof

PK reiterates that while he doesn't reject evidence, he finds it inconclusive for proving alien visitation. He believes that for the ETH to be accepted, it would need to meet a standard of proof beyond a reasonable doubt, which he feels has not been met. He suggests that a balance of probabilities, a standard used in civil trials, might be a more achievable goal for proving alien visitation.

Multiple Theories and Open-Mindedness

PK highlights that various theories for UFO phenomena are not mutually exclusive. He suggests that aliens could be visiting, extraterrestrial beings could be present, and weird natural phenomena could also be occurring simultaneously. He advocates for keeping an open mind to all possibilities and continuing to study the evidence. He criticizes those who rigidly adhere to the ETH, accusing them of not being open-minded themselves.

Ufology and Politics

PK discusses the potential for his interest in ufology to be a barrier to entering politics. He outlines how he would handle such a question in a debate, emphasizing that he is convinced of the UFO phenomenon's reality but does not necessarily equate it with alien visitation. He would stress the need for serious scientific study and point to credible witnesses like Kelly Johnson, who designed the U2 aircraft and reported UFOs, as examples of why the subject warrants attention. He believes politicians should not fear the UFO phenomenon itself but rather the 'crazier elements' of ufology that can make answering questions more difficult.

Phil Klass and Skepticism

PK discusses the late ufologist Phil Klass, stating that Klass himself admitted he would have shaken hands with an alien if he had met one, suggesting that even skeptics are not necessarily closed-minded to the possibility of extraterrestrial life. He notes that Klass and Brad Sparks, a respected ufologist, were friends despite their differing views.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the scientific approach to ufology, the need for rigorous evidence, and the challenges of proving extraordinary claims. There's a consistent emphasis on distinguishing between the reality of the UFO phenomenon and specific explanations like the ETH. The editorial stance appears to favor a cautious, evidence-based, and scientifically grounded investigation of UFOs, while acknowledging the public's fascination and the potential for sensationalism within the field.

This issue of UFO Magazine features a series of interviews and discussions with prominent figures in the ufology community, exploring various aspects of the field, from specific cases to the personalities involved. The content is largely conversational, delving into the opinions and experiences of the interviewees.

Key Articles and Discussions

Ufological Personalities and Debates

The magazine opens with a discussion about the late Phil Klass and his interactions with other ufologists like Bruce Maccabee. Klass is described as playing an important role in making researchers 'go out and get your evidential ducks in a row.' The conversation touches on the 'ufological political spectrum' and the tendency for individuals to be entrenched in their views, with a desire for a more reasoned discussion from the center.

Several individuals are mentioned and their contributions discussed. Phil Klass is noted for his critical stance, while Bruce Maccabee is credited with making researchers think critically. Brad Sparks is highlighted as an example of a good researcher. The discussion also covers the merits of cases like the New Zealand case and the RB47 case. The issue acknowledges that while some figures like Klass may have been 'mean-spirited,' they played a role in the discourse.

The Role of Skepticism and Open-mindedness

Paul Kimball (PK) emphasizes the importance of an open mind and criticizes close-mindedness on both sides of the ufology debate. He expresses faith in the public's common sense to make the right call when presented with facts, though he notes that 'pro ET'ers have made the wrong call' due to a different standard of proof.

PK discusses his admiration for various ufologists, including Stan Friedman for his persistence and commitment, Brad Sparks for his research, Dick Hall for his persistence, and Jerry Clark. He also mentions Nick Redfern as a popularizer and researcher, Mac Tonnies as bright, Will Wise for running the Project Blue Book Archive, and Greg Bishop for his book 'Project Beta.' He notes that many of the 'old line ufologists' are nearing the end of their careers and questions if a new generation is emerging to carry on their work.

Personal Reflections and Blog Content

PK shares his philosophy on taking subjects seriously but not himself, citing Alfred Lehmberg as an example of someone who takes himself too seriously. He discusses his own blog content, including pictures of himself, and defends it as a reader service. He also touches upon his complex relationship with Alfred Lehmberg, whom he describes as an 'attack dog of ufology' but also someone he respects despite disagreements.

Radar Operations and Black Projects

Chris Coote, a former principal Radar Operator for the MoD at Eskmeals, is interviewed about his 15 years of experience. He discusses his work involving the collection, manipulation, and archival storage of sensitive positional data, stressing the need for caution due to his 'Secret' level clearance. Coote mentions seeing 'very strange things on radar screens' and knowing people who had similar experiences at other locations like Menwith Hill and Fylingdales.

Coote expresses cynicism about the Condign report, suggesting it might be a whitewash. He explains that his radar work involved tracking legitimate targets and that data was stored on magnetic tape. He also recounts a friend's experience with the high level of security at RAF stations, suggesting that 'there are obviously things they don't want us to know about.' Coote believes there are both black projects and phenomena beyond control, and he is of the opinion that there are 'strange objects up in the sky that are not of terrestrial build.' He recalls a specific incident in September 1977.

Application to UFO Watchdog

Stuart Miller submits an application to be featured on the UFO Watchdog Web Site, humorously listing 'wicked things' he has done within ufology, including being nice to Paul Kimball, not helping Wendy Connors across the road, and believing UFOs are extraterrestrial and here to save the planet. He also expresses admiration for Michael Salla and Steven Greer's work.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue consistently emphasizes the importance of critical thinking, evidence-based research, and maintaining an open mind within the complex and often contentious field of ufology. There is a recurring theme of dissecting the personalities and dynamics within the ufology community, highlighting both the contributions and the perceived flaws of various figures. The magazine appears to advocate for a balanced approach, acknowledging the existence of unexplained phenomena while also being critical of unsubstantiated claims and sensationalism. The interview with Chris Coote introduces a perspective from someone with direct experience in military radar operations, offering a glimpse into potential government secrecy surrounding unexplained aerial phenomena.

Title: UFO REVIEW
Issue: 51
Volume: 4
Date: November 1997
Publisher: Flying Saucer Review Publications
Country: United Kingdom
Price: £2.50
ISSN: 0015-4807

This issue of UFO REVIEW features a detailed interview with an individual identified as 'CC' (Chris), who shares personal experiences with unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) and radar anomalies. The magazine also dedicates significant space to exploring the mysteries of the Voynich Manuscript and the Kolbrin Bible.

Personal UAP Encounters and Radar Anomalies

The interview with 'CC' (Chris) forms a substantial part of the issue. He recounts several personal sightings and experiences. The first incident occurred on a clear, blue-sky morning, where he initially mistook a crescent-shaped object for the moon. Upon closer inspection, he realized it was not the moon and observed it altering its position, seemingly taking readings. This sighting was also witnessed by a paper boy and the interviewee's mother. The object was estimated to be about 10 miles away. CC attributes the clear skies and lack of light pollution in the area to potentially better visibility of such phenomena.

When questioned by the interviewer (SM) about the possibility of it being an airplane, CC, with his knowledge of British aircraft, stated that he had never seen anything like it and that it appeared to be intelligently controlled. He admits to trying to find rational explanations, such as 'a trick of the light' or 'an unusual plane,' but ultimately concluded he could not explain it.

A more recent experience involved seeing a 'biggish, black looming looking thing' on the horizon while driving up the M6 motorway. He initially thought it was a plane attempting to land at Manchester airport but noted it was taking an unusually long time. He then observed it was a large black triangle with many flashing lights, hovering without any visible means of support. He speculated it might be a Goodyear airship but dismissed the idea. He noted the lack of attention from other drivers, lamenting the phenomenon of people not looking up.

CC also discusses radar traces, recalling an incident around Christmas time when he was performing calibration figures. He latched onto an object that initially appeared to be a fast jet. However, this object moved at an 'incredibly fast rate,' evading tracking attempts. He describes it as moving at a 'phenomenal speed,' to the extent that it 'slightly damaged the radar; the set had to be realigned.' He estimates its speed to be far beyond that of typical jets, mentioning a similar incident at Fylingdales where an object was tracked at approximately 15,000 mph. He expresses bewilderment about what could move at such speeds.

Another incident involved observing 'lights dancing on the horizon' with a colleague, Ted Talbot, in 1973. This occurred before any firing exercises, leading them to believe it was not related to military activity. CC is convinced that 'there are things out there without a doubt.'

Regarding discussions of these phenomena at work, CC stated that it 'tended not to' be discussed officially, likely due to signing the Official Secrets Act and a general dismissiveness or fear of ridicule among colleagues. He notes that in 1996, the Ministry of Defence (MoD) was prepared to spend £100,000 on a report, suggesting to him that there was some belief in the subject matter.

The Voynich Manuscript

The issue features an in-depth article on the Voynich Manuscript, a mysterious book measuring seven by ten inches with approximately 250 pages. Written in an unknown language, it has eluded all attempts at deciphering. It is believed to have been compiled in Europe during medieval times and was discovered in Italy in 1912 by antiquarian bookseller Wilfrid M. Voynich. It was later sold to H. P. Kraus and eventually donated to Yale University. Scholars suspect it may have been written by the Franciscan cleric Roger Bacon (1214-1294), who had an interest in alchemy.

The manuscript's early history is not well-documented, but it is thought to have been purchased by Emperor Rudolph II (1552-1612) for 600 ducats. A letter dated 1666 from Johannes Marcus Marci to Athanasius Kircher mentioned its acquisition by Rudolph II.

The document contains numerous colored illustrations depicting herbal recipes, unknown plants, zodiac signs, astronomical charts, microscopic cells, and naked women. The presence of plants identified as New World specimens brought back by Columbus suggests the manuscript could not have been written before 1493.

The Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library at Yale University houses the manuscript. Its introduction states it contains 'Scientific or magical text in an unidentified language, in cipher, apparently based on Roman minuscule characters.' The text is believed by some scholars to be the work of Roger Bacon.

Attempts to decipher the manuscript are detailed, including the work of Brig. John Tiltman and William F. Friedman. The text is written in a neat script that has defied interpretation by leading cryptographic minds. Computer analysis suggests two 'languages' are used: Voynich A and Voynich B. Since 1919, various attempts have been made, with W. Friedman and J. Tiltman concluding the language was artificial.

Dr. Gordon Rugg, a psychologist and computer science teacher at Keele University, proposes a theory that the manuscript was created using a 'Verifier Approach,' a paper-and-pen method. He utilized a grid system, similar to a method possibly used by Edward Kelley, an assistant to astrologer John Dee, to create words by combining syllables. Rugg discovered a mechanism called the Cardan Grille, first depicted around 1550 by Girolamo Cardano, which involves using a grille with slots to form words from fragments.

Several websites are listed for further information on the Voynich Manuscript, including those from Yale University, the BBC, and dedicated Voynich sites. James Finn, author of 'Pandora's Hope,' suggests the code might have been 'visually encoded' rather than logically or mathematically encoded.

The Kolbrin Bible

The issue also introduces the Kolbrin Bible, described as a collection of ancient texts that are contrary to, or an alternative of, the official version of the Bible. It comprises two books: 'The Kolbrin' and 'The Gospel of the Kailedy.' The preface states that it contains documents from various sources, many partially complete due to damage over time.

The Kolbrin Bible is considered controversial and its study is linked to predicted devastating earth changes and 'The End Times.' The Culdian Trust is identified as the 'guardians' of this work.

According to its foreword, the Kolbrin Bible formulates a distinctive spiritual philosophy and serves as a transmitter of 'ageless wisdom.' It is presented as enlightened teachings that are applicable today as they were in the past, with much of the content reconstructed from salvaged, damaged manuscripts.

Information is provided on how to purchase copies, which are available from New Zealand at a significant cost due to postage and packing. Extracts are also available online. The Kolbrin is said to have originated from Glastonbury Abbey, with documents saved from a fire in 1184. Over time, much of the original text was lost or destroyed, but caretakers have worked to preserve and reconstruct it. It later fell into the possession of John Culdy, becoming known as 'The Bronzebook of Britain,' and also integrated remnants of 'The Coelbook.'

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the investigation of unexplained aerial phenomena, the enduring mystery of coded ancient texts, and the exploration of alternative religious or historical narratives. The editorial stance appears to be one of open inquiry into these subjects, presenting detailed accounts of sightings, historical documents, and theories, while acknowledging the controversial and often unproven nature of the topics discussed. The magazine encourages readers to explore further through the provided links and resources.

This issue of the magazine, spanning pages 61-70, delves into the enigmatic Kolbrin Bible and its potential connections to UFO phenomena, government secrecy, and espionage. It features discussions on the origins and contents of the Kolbrin, alongside an examination of declassified FBI files concerning ESP research and its implications.

The Kolbrin Bible

The issue introduces the Kolbrin Bible, described as a significant document that blends scientific understanding with creationism and intelligent design. It is suggested to be the first Judaic/Christian document of its kind. The Kolbrin is said to speak of the return of a 'Destroyer' planet, a dark star that has caused past disasters and is predicted to do so again, with speculation that this could be Nibiru or Planet X. The text is presented as a compilation of various ancient books, including 'The Book of Creation', 'The Book of Gleanings', 'The Book of Scrolls', 'The Book of the Sons of Fire', 'The Book of Manuscripts', 'The Book of Morals and Precepts', 'The Book of Origins or Ferilbook', 'The Book of the Silver Bough', 'The Book of Lucius', and 'The Book of Wisdom'. The origins of the Kolbrin are reputedly linked to a note found within an old copy of the book, with a URL provided for further information.

FBI Investigations into ESP and UFOs

A significant portion of the issue is dedicated to exploring declassified FBI files from the 1950s and 1960s concerning research into Extra Sensory Perception (ESP). The articles highlight how the FBI, along with other intelligence agencies like the CIA and DIA, investigated ESP as a potential tool for psychological warfare and espionage. The files reveal meetings at the Pentagon in 1952 where the use of ESP was discussed, with concerns that the Russians might have perfected ESP for brainwashing US citizens and influencing their beliefs about alien encounters.

The issue discusses the FBI's interest in individuals like George Adamski and George Van Tassel, who claimed contact with aliens. While Van Tassel was investigated for potential Soviet espionage, Adamski's pro-communist statements raised suspicions that he might have been influenced by ESP. The FBI was also interested in employing psychics to gather intelligence from briefcases and filing cabinets of overseas agents.

Manipulation and Conspiracy Theories

Nick Redfern, an author interviewed in the issue, posits that the UFO subject itself, including phenomena like alleged abductions and cattle mutilations, may have been manipulated by intelligence agencies. He suggests that these events could have been part of a psychological warfare operation or a means to hide other activities, rather than genuine encounters with extraterrestrial beings. Redfern argues that while a real phenomenon might exist, its interpretation by the public and researchers allows intelligence agencies to exploit these beliefs.

He draws parallels between modern abduction accounts and older fairy lore, suggesting that the ETH (Extraterrestrial Hypothesis) might not be the only explanation. Instead, he proposes that phenomena could be more akin to 'tulpa-like thought forms' or paranormal occurrences that are then interpreted through the lens of alien visitation. The issue also touches upon other chapters in 'The Anomalist no.12', including interviews with Rupert Sheldrake, discussions on Jack the Ripper, crypto zoology, and the mystery of the Perch Lake mounds.

Book Review: 'Abducted: How People Come to Believe They Were Kidnapped by Aliens'

The issue includes a review of Susan Clancy's book, 'Abducted: How People Come to Believe They Were Kidnapped by Aliens'. The reviewer expresses a strong personal admiration for the author while critiquing the book's stance, particularly its dismissal of abduction therapists and Bud Hopkins. The reviewer finds Clancy's arguments to be subtly presented but ultimately dismissive of the experiences of abductees, suggesting that Clancy believes all abductees are 'nuts' or that their experiences are a form of psychological manipulation.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the intersection of ancient texts, modern mysteries, and government secrecy. The Kolbrin Bible is presented as a potentially significant historical and prophetic document, while the declassified FBI files highlight a historical interest in parapsychology for intelligence purposes. The issue strongly leans into conspiracy theories, suggesting that UFO phenomena and related beliefs may have been deliberately manipulated by intelligence agencies. The editorial stance appears to be one of critical inquiry, questioning official narratives and exploring alternative explanations for unexplained phenomena, often with a focus on government involvement and psychological warfare.

This issue of UFOMAG, identified as issue 17, is primarily focused on UFOlogy and related topics, with a strong emphasis on historical events and contemporary discussions within the field. The magazine features a review of Colin Bennett's book 'An American Demonology: Flying Saucers Over the White House', which delves into the 1950s era of UFO investigations, particularly the work of Captain Edward J. Ruppelt and the United States Air Force's Project Blue Book. The issue also includes announcements for upcoming UFO conferences in 2006 and a lighthearted, instructional piece on how to build a homemade UFO.

Book Review: An American Demonology

The review of Colin Bennett's 'An American Demonology: Flying Saucers Over the White House' is a central piece of this issue. The reviewer expresses a strong admiration for the book, stating that it offers a unique perspective on the 1950s UFO phenomenon. The book is described not as a biography of Ruppelt, but as being about him, with a narrow timeframe and specific focus. A key strength highlighted is the book's ability to transport the reader back to the 1950s, making them feel as if they were present during the early stages of UFO investigations and the public's fascination with the topic. The review emphasizes the book's vivid depiction of the military's role in society at the time, its relationship with the public, and its perceived naivety as it embraced 'Big Science'.

Bennett's writing is characterized as graphic, with implied criticism. The reviewer notes that Bennett makes assumptions about Roswell and MJ-12, but these do not detract from the overall narrative. A significant point of interest for the reviewer is Bennett's implication that a clandestine group, operating discreetly, holds special interest and possesses unfettered access and ultimate power. This concept is described as a 'private cabal, highly financed, very tightly run, efficient, skilled, with an aero engineering background.' The review also touches upon the Washington 1952 event, calling it a 'sham' and a turning point.

The reviewer contrasts Bennett's work with other books, suggesting that 'An American Demonology' provides a much-needed immersion into the historical context of UFO sightings and investigations.

DIY UFO: Happy Fun Days

In a lighter segment, the magazine provides instructions for children aged 3 to 9 on how to create their own 'UFO'. Titled 'HAPPY FUN DAYS ARE HERE BOYS AND GIRLS AS UNCLE STUART SHOWS YOU HOW TO MAKE YOUR VERY OWN UFO', this section encourages readers to launch a 'fake lantern style UFO' into the night sky. The instructions detail the materials needed, including cash (from 'mum's purse'), a container for petrol, balloons, and matches. The process involves obtaining petrol from a garage, filling balloons with it, and then presumably launching them. The tone is playful, albeit with a slightly mischievous undertone, suggesting that this activity can cause 'pandemonium' and make 'so called UFO experts' look foolish.

Conferences and Events

The issue announces several upcoming conferences and events related to UFOs and related subjects:

• 2006 New Frontiers Symposium: Scheduled for Saturday, October 14, 2006, in Halifax, Nova Scotia. The theme is 'Extraterrestrial Life, Space Exploration, & The Future'. Speakers include Greg Bishop, Stan Friedman, Paul Kimball, Nick Redfern, Mac Tonnies, Will Wise, and Robert Zimmerman. The event is to be held at The Auditorium, McNally Building (Main), St. Mary's University.
• The Dark 30 Tour: Presented by Shadowbox Enterprises, this event is scheduled for Saturday, December 9, 2006, starting at 3 pm in Kansas City, Missouri. It features Jim Marrs, Joshua P. Warren, and Nick Redfern discussing their experiences, including those in Roswell, New Mexico. The tour is described as 'LIVE & UNCENSORED' and will last 7-8 hours, with 350 seats available.
• PROBE INTERNATIONAL UK 12th 2-DAY CONFERENCE: This conference is scheduled for October 7th/8th, 2006, at the YMCA in St. Albans Road, St. Anne's, near Blackpool. Confirmed speakers for Saturday include Brian Halliwell, Ellis Taylor, Stan & Richard Conway, Clint Denyer, and Dean Warwick (from New Zealand), who will discuss topics ranging from 'The Mothman Prophecies' to 'The Soul of The Paranormal And The Hollow Earth', and his association with USA Intelligence and the assassination of Robert Kennedy. Sunday speakers include Marcus Allen, Brian J. Allan, John Pickering & Kate Hall, and 'Bagol' Dream Traveller, covering topics like 'The Apollo Moon Landings Fact or Fiction?' and 'The Secret of Roslyn Chapel'. Tickets are £14 per day.

Other Content

The issue also includes a humorous map of 'Rudloe Manor Visitors map' with satirical labels for various locations, such as 'UFO WITNESS BRAINWASHING TEST FACILITY', 'UFO HOAX OFFICE', and 'UFOMAG INCINERATOR'.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the historical investigation of UFO phenomena, particularly in the 1950s, and the ongoing discourse within the ufology community. There is a critical stance towards simplistic explanations, as seen in the reviewer's dismissal of the idea that all UFO phenomena can be explained by 'sleep paralysis'. The magazine appears to embrace a perspective that acknowledges the possibility of genuine, unexplained aerial phenomena and potentially covert government or private group involvement, as suggested by the review of Bennett's book. The inclusion of conference announcements indicates an active and engaged community interested in these topics. The DIY UFO section, while lighthearted, also plays into the broader theme of UFOs, suggesting a pervasive cultural interest in the subject, even among children.