UFO Review - Issue 09

Magazine Overview

Title: UFO REVIEW
Issue Date: March 2005
Issue Number: 9

This issue of UFO REVIEW, dated March 2005, presents a diverse range of articles and interviews centered around ufology, intelligence operations, and related phenomena. The cover features humorous captions and images related to Peter Jennings and the idea of aliens, under the main title "UFO REVIEW." The editorial section reflects on the recent Peter Jennings UFO documentary, offering a measured perspective on its impact on the field.

Welcome (Editorial)

The editor begins by acknowledging that the current issue is late due to other commitments, leading to a decision to make UFO Review a bi-monthly publication. This change, while reluctant, is intended to allow for more detailed and higher-quality editions. The editor then discusses the Peter Jennings UFO documentary, stating that while it aimed for balance, it likely swayed viewers towards the ufology perspective due to the credible and articulate witnesses presented. The documentary is seen as having advanced the cause of ufology by treating the subject with respect, even if it didn't create a major breakthrough in media indifference.

Included Middle Man: Interview with Greg Bishop

This extensive interview with Greg Bishop, author of 'Project Beta: The Story of Paul Bennewitz, National Security, and the Creation of a Modern UFO Myth,' forms a significant portion of the issue. Bishop is described as operating at a "subterranean level of Ufology" through publications like Atlantis Rising and his magazine, The Excluded Middle. The interview delves into the Paul Bennewitz affair, a case involving alleged UFO intelligence and disinformation. Bishop discusses his relationship with Bill Moore, who broke the Roswell story and MJ12 papers, and how Moore's past involvement with AFOSI in relation to Bennewitz led to distrust within the UFO community. The book 'Project Beta' is noted for its cautious reception due to the potential for further, unpleasant revelations about intelligence operations.

Bishop explains that the disinformation campaigns were designed to mislead people, keep them away from sensitive air force projects, and identify who was interested in UFOs. He highlights how figures like Rick Doty capitalized on these stories. The interview debunks common ufological beliefs, particularly the existence of an underground base at Dulce, suggesting it was a fabrication to divert attention from other sites like Kirtland AFB. Bishop also touches upon the idea of alien races like the Ebans and Sweads, linking them to 1950s contactee mythology and suggesting they were used to maintain control over information and track interested parties.

Bishop expresses that while intelligence agencies were doing their job, he disagrees with the methods used, particularly how Paul Bennewitz was allegedly driven to mental distress. He suggests that a more direct approach, appealing to Bennewitz's patriotism, could have been used instead of letting the deception continue to extract information.

The motivation for writing the book stemmed from Bishop's personal connection with Bill Moore and his witnessing of Moore's controversial 1988 announcement in Las Vegas. This announcement suggested that many popular UFO narratives, including underground bases, abductions for technology, and alien intervention in history, were primarily products of a disinformation campaign.

Other Articles and Features

• Special announcement from the President of the United States: (Page 23)
• Give the guy a chance: An interview with Dr. Michael Salla discussing "Exopolitics." (Page 24)
• Various comments and thoughts about the Peter Jennings special: (Page 33)
• Cryptozoology Corner: A report on a creature seen in a garden pond by reporter Dam Acne. (Page 47)
• Alternatives: Kithra revisits "Grandma on the Telly" and "Alternative 3." (Page 49)
• Mystery booms heard across London: An investigation into unexplained loud booms in the capital city. (Page 55)
• UFO Recognition Part 2 – UFO Lighting: The second part of Bill Hamilton's article on identifying UFOs. (Page 57)
• Searching for the Truth: An editorial by Dennis Balthaser. (Page 60)
• India chosen nation for ET visitation: An exclusive article by Rashid Rabbitveryfast. (Page 63)
• The abductee who looks forward to being taken: An interview with author Lisette Larkins. (Page 64)
• Did a UFO crash in rural S.E. Missouri in 1941?: A reader-submitted article by SeekingMoInfo. (Page 76)

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the nature of truth in ufology, the role of intelligence agencies in shaping narratives, and the impact of disinformation. The editorial stance, particularly in the welcome and the interview with Greg Bishop, suggests a critical yet open-minded approach to UFO phenomena. There is a strong emphasis on dissecting claims, identifying potential manipulation, and understanding the psychological and political motivations behind UFO stories. The magazine appears to advocate for a more grounded and evidence-based examination of the subject, while acknowledging the genuine mysteries that persist.

This issue of UFO Magazine, identified as issue number 11 and volume 11, published by UFO Magazine, likely in the United States, focuses heavily on the Bennewitz case and related UFO phenomena. The cover headline, "The Bennewitz Case: The Truth Revealed," and the accompanying image of Bennewitz's business premises, suggest a deep dive into this controversial subject. The issue is dated as '11' with a raw date of '11', and a determined issue date of January 1, 2001, with a cover price of $4.95 and ISSN 1092-7527.

The Bennewitz Case and Intelligence Agencies

The central narrative revolves around the experiences of UFO researcher Bill Moore and his interactions with intelligence agencies, particularly concerning Paul Bennewitz. Greg Bishop (GB) discusses his feelings about Bill Moore, comparing his own relationship with Moore to that of Warren Beatty with Elia Kazan, emphasizing loyalty and personal history. Bishop explains that Moore received hints and information from intelligence sources, including documents like the Eisenhower briefing and the Carter briefing, which were intended to guide his research but also to test his discretion.

Moore was given access to documents and information, with the understanding that he had to discern truth from falsehood. The MJ12 documents, mailed to Jamie Shandera in 1984 or 1985, are discussed as a significant part of this deal. Moore published a book on these documents, assessing their authenticity and identifying potential disinformation. Bishop defends Moore's actions, stating he judged documents on their merits and that some alterations were made to test information reliability, a technique learned from an ad hoc spy school.

Richard Doty, an intelligence agent, is a key figure in the discussions. Bishop describes Doty as someone who enjoyed his job of keeping secrets and manipulating information. Doty provided information to Bishop, some of which was later identified as "crap" or "junk." Bishop's criterion for including Doty's information in his book was corroboration from at least two other sources. Doty's account of Bennewitz seeing a UFO and having his photos replaced with blank frames is presented as an example of Doty's modus operandi.

Bishop recounts an experience with an Air Force physicist who answered questions indirectly, hinting at information rather than providing direct answers. This physicist drove Bishop around Kirtland Air Force Base and showed him various sites, including antennas and underground bunkers related to testing.

Doty's role is further explored, with Bishop believing Doty was a detective-like operative tasked with monitoring individuals interested in UFOs. While Doty may have had access to significant information, Bishop suggests he didn't know the "whole thing" and was likely carrying out orders within a compartmentalized system.

Cattle Mutilations and Government Operations

Another significant theme is the theory that cattle mutilations are not extraterrestrial in origin but are instead government-organized events. Bishop explains that his reasoning stems from conversations with Gabe Valdez, who investigated numerous mutilations in the 1970s and 80s. Valdez found evidence such as gas masks and radio chaff at the sites, which he argued aliens would not leave behind. Linda Howe's counter-argument that aliens leave such items to make it appear human-caused is mentioned, but Bishop finds it unconvincing.

Bishop suggests that these operations might be conducted by quasi-governmental or private agencies supported by the government. The purpose could be to test stealth technology, study the effects on the population, or spread disinformation. He notes that the methods used, such as helicopters and nighttime operations near homes, are indicative of sophisticated human operations designed to test capabilities and observe reactions.

Chris O'Brien and Gabe Valdez also lean towards a human agency explanation, possibly related to a pathogen that escaped into the animal population in the mid-to-late 1960s, causing a disease similar to Mad Cow disease. This theory aims to explain the decimation of native animal populations.

Bishop also touches upon the idea that some witnessed events related to cattle mutilations involved people in robes, candles, and other ritualistic elements, suggesting a human element that doesn't fit the alien narrative.

Technology and UFOs

The issue also discusses the performance of UFO craft, with the automatic assumption being that such capabilities must be extraterrestrial. However, Bishop hints that advanced technology, possibly anti-gravity research, may already exist within human capabilities, potentially developed since the 1950s by governments like the US and UK. He questions why such aircraft are not seen in operation, suggesting they might be mistaken for UFOs. The discussion briefly touches upon the Iranian air force's order to shoot down UFOs, with Bishop speculating they might be drones.

Paul Bennewitz's Fate

With hindsight, Bennewitz is described as a "disaster waiting to happen" due to his location near an air base and his background and interests. Bishop believes Bennewitz was a family man, and his son Matthew blamed Richard Doty for his father's decline and institutionalization. Bishop feels sorry for Bennewitz but acknowledges the high stakes involved in the information Moore was privy to.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are government secrecy, the manipulation of information, the potential for advanced human technology disguised as UFOs, and a critical examination of the cattle mutilation phenomenon, leaning towards a human-agency explanation. The editorial stance appears to be one of skepticism towards simplistic extraterrestrial explanations and a focus on uncovering the complex web of intelligence operations and disinformation surrounding UFO phenomena. The magazine champions investigative journalism and the pursuit of corroborating evidence, even when dealing with sources known for deception.

This issue of UFO Magazine, dated February 2005, features a cover headline announcing a "SPECIAL ANNOUNCEMENT FROM THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES." The magazine includes interviews and articles focusing on Exopolitics, UFO cover-ups, and whistleblower testimony.

Interview with Greg Bishop

The issue includes an interview with Greg Bishop, author of "Project Beta: The Story of Paul Bennewitz, National Security, and the Creation of a Modern UFO Myth." Bishop discusses his experience writing the book, noting that while he is not entirely happy with how the story was told, it was a learning curve. He acknowledges that a Publishers Weekly review pointed out weaknesses in character development, which he attributes partly to it being his first book and the difficulty of accessing information about the deceased Paul Bennewitz. Bishop expresses that British people seem to have a healthy skepticism towards the subject, which he respects, encouraging an inquiring attitude to examine pros and cons. He believes that if one cannot reach a conclusion based on research and facts, it might be a disservice to ufology. Bishop also touches upon the idea that Americans might be more receptive to UFO research, achieving more than researchers in the UK.

He reflects on his collaboration with an unnamed individual who helped him write the book, stating that this person wanted to write it but couldn't, so Bishop took on the task. While there were philosophical disagreements, the individual found the book largely accurate. Bishop mentions that he asked difficult questions about why certain things were done and whether guilt was felt, receiving straightforward answers. He notes that the book's subject matter is of interest to UFO researchers, and he is essentially reiterating points made by "Bill" in 1989, suggesting that people are now more receptive to these ideas.

Bishop also mentions a forthcoming book by a well-known author that was kept secret until publication, hinting at a potential "bombshell." He believes he is not facing the same level of criticism that "Bill" did.

Interview with Dr. Michael Salla: Exopolitics

This section features an extensive interview with Dr. Michael Salla, described as a leading exponent of Exopolitics. Salla explains that Exopolitics operates on the premise that there is sufficient evidence for UFOs and an alien presence, urging focus on whistleblower testimony rather than just "nuts and bolts" evidence. He acknowledges that the credentials of some whistleblowers can be difficult to verify, leading some to dismiss Exopolitics as fantasy and damaging to Ufology.

Salla believes that many people are seeking understanding regarding secret policy-making and the implications of an undisclosed presence. He suggests that while people intuitively feel something is happening, the debate continues on whether the evidence is conclusive. He posits that people are less interested in governmental acknowledgment and more in understanding the secret processes established to deal with the phenomenon. Salla argues that "nuts and bolts" ufologists are frustrated because they seek hard evidence to use in their research, whereas Exopolitics focuses on conjecture and speculation based on the idea of an existing extraterrestrial presence.

Salla identifies Stephen Bassett and Steven Greer as individuals who bridge both "camps" of ufology. He states his own background is in political science, leading him to focus on the evidence of a secret infrastructure dealing with the UFO arena. He cites the handling of the original Project Sign report by the US Air Force in 1948, where the Chief of Staff requested an "inconclusive result," as evidence of a pre-existing political process to keep the phenomenon out of the public arena. He also mentions the Project Blue Book process and the involvement of junior officers like Captain Ruppelt, as well as Major Donald Keyhoe's descriptions of official cover-ups, as further indicators of a political process.

Salla suggests the reasons for a cover-up include potential impacts on public culture and religion, the economy (particularly the energy sector), and national security due to extraterrestrial communication capabilities. He believes the government could do more to prepare the public for the implications of extraterrestrial races, whose activities are perceived as worrying. He notes that while some encounters are positive, others involve disturbing accounts of abductions and genetic experiments. Salla fears that releasing information without a filtering process could cause widespread fear.

He advocates for a "graduated disclosure project," starting with acknowledging life on Mars, then advanced extraterrestrial civilizations, and eventually the Earthly presence. Salla believes that acknowledging even macro biological life on Mars would have a significant impact on religion and open speculation about intelligent life elsewhere. He agrees that while many can process this information, a majority may struggle.

Salla argues that the public's readiness for the truth is a significant factor, suggesting that information has been circulated for years without full public absorption, not solely due to government manipulation. He believes a collective psychology is at play, making advanced alien life a difficult concept for many to accept. While polls show a growing belief in extraterrestrial life, Salla differentiates between a poll response and actual commitment, suggesting a "disjunct" between belief systems and willingness to engage.

Regarding the criticism of whistleblower credibility, Salla explains that Steven Greer's filtering process was criticized for not being stringent enough. Salla argues that whistleblowers may not have hard evidence because the information is classified, and possessing such evidence could be illegal. He emphasizes that collectively, the testimonies of senior individuals from responsible positions (e.g., nuclear weapons, secret aircraft) who disclose stories about UFOs, cover-ups, and extraterrestrial entities, constitute important evidence of a pattern. He supports the idea that governments may have tampered with whistleblower credentials, citing Bob Lazar's experience of his records disappearing. Salla also recounts a negative experience with a university affiliation after a Washington Post interview about his work, which led to his affiliation not being renewed and a program being terminated, potentially due to external pressure.

Presidential Announcement (Satirical)

A satirical "SPECIAL ANNOUNCEMENT FROM THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES" is presented, featuring a photograph of a man wearing a t-shirt that says "Heil myself." The announcement, attributed to someone named "Thog," states that after careful analysis, there is "absolute certainty that there is no evidence of any discernible signs of life on Earth." It concludes by telling Americans to "plain frig off" regarding life on Mars. A disclaimer warns that repeating the message is at the risk of one's house and its contents.

Comic Strip

A comic strip titled "off the mark" by Mark Parisi depicts a scene in "MISSION CONTROL" where an operative reports a "gruesome sight" with "melted bodies everywhere" and a cryptic message that appears to say, "APPY THDAY."

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue strongly leans into the Exopolitics perspective, emphasizing the importance of whistleblower testimony and government secrecy in understanding the UFO phenomenon. The editorial stance appears to favor the idea of an ongoing cover-up and the need for a more transparent, albeit gradual, disclosure of information regarding extraterrestrial presence. There is a clear distinction made between traditional "nuts and bolts" ufology and the Exopolitics approach, with a leaning towards the latter's broader interpretation of evidence and political implications. The satirical presidential announcement and the comic strip suggest a critical and sometimes humorous take on official narratives and the potential absurdity of the situation.

This issue of UFO Magazine delves into the aftermath and critique of the Peter Jennings Special on UFOs, featuring contributions from prominent figures in the ufology community. The magazine explores various facets of the UFO phenomenon, including witness testimony, government cover-ups, extraterrestrial races, and the controversial handling of these topics by mainstream media.

Critiques of the Peter Jennings Special

Several articles express significant disappointment with the Peter Jennings Special. Dennis G. Balthaser notes that the show, despite its anticipation, offered little new information for serious researchers and failed to address crucial aspects like the government cover-up or the full scope of the UFO phenomenon. He criticizes the show for not giving adequate time to key researchers like Stanton Friedman and for presenting a biased view, particularly regarding the Roswell Incident. Balthaser feels the show was an opportunity missed to inform the public objectively.

Dr. Michael Salla echoes these sentiments, stating that while the show brought the UFO phenomenon to mainstream attention, it veered into a murky and inconclusive assessment. He highlights the distorted handling of the abduction phenomenon, noting the exclusion of Dr. John Mack's interview while featuring Bud Hopkins. Salla also laments the absence of whistleblower testimony concerning government cover-ups and reverse engineering of extraterrestrial vehicles. He suggests the show's primary achievement was sparking interest for market share rather than genuine disclosure.

Lan Fleming agrees with the general assessment, pointing out the use of 'propaganda buzzwords' and a lack of substance. Fleming criticizes the show for referring to Stanton Friedman as a 'Roswell promoter' while not similarly labeling debunkers. He also notes the exclusion of Dr. Mack's interview and the poor handling of the abduction phenomenon, describing it as a 'blatantly one-sided propaganda treatment.' Fleming concludes that the program was a 'non-event' with no real impact on public or scientific perception.

Whitley Strieber offers a scathing critique, calling the Jennings special 'another level of propaganda' that admitted some truth to make its lies more palatable. He argues that the producers are 'cursed with the belief that they can understand' the complex UFO phenomenon, leading to judgments based on inadequate information. Strieber defends the characterization of the Roswell Incident as a hoax and investigators as cultists as 'classic disinformation' intended to conceal the truth. He shares a personal account from his uncle, Edward Strieber, and General Arthur Exon, who claimed knowledge of the extraterrestrial origin of the Roswell debris, contrasting this with Peter Jennings' alleged willingness to lie for profit.

Alfred Lehmberg, in his piece "Seeing Is Believing," Naught, also expresses strong dissatisfaction, describing the two-hour special as 'well travelled, safe, and predictable "yadda" with oppressive overdoses of the conventional "blah."' He feels Jennings took the easy way out, relying on 'outmoded and invalidated "conventional wisdoms."' Lehmberg criticizes the show for its bias, particularly in the Roswell and Abduction segments, which he found 'badly handled, poorly chosen, and explicated incompetently with prejudice.' He accuses ABC of 'contriving the lie of _Omission_' and stacking the deck against ufological principals.

Key Themes and Discussions

Extraterrestrial Races and Government Awareness

Dr. Michael Salla discusses the belief that governments are aware of numerous extraterrestrial races visiting Earth. He references whistleblower testimonies, including Robert Dean's account of a 1964 NATO document detailing four extraterrestrial races. Other whistleblowers suggest as many as 57 or more races. Salla believes this knowledge is being withheld from the public, and that governments may have limited control over these visiting ET races, unsure of their exact activities or long-term motivations.

The Role of Witness Testimony and Methodology

Dr. Salla emphasizes the need for better ways to analyze whistleblower testimonies, suggesting that while Steven Greer has assembled many whistleblowers, more systematic criteria are needed. He advocates for rigorous social science criteria to investigate and analyze testimony from witnesses, contactees, and abductees. This, he argues, is critical for developing a coherent picture of the secret government infrastructure dealing with UFOs and extraterrestrials. Salla acknowledges that witness testimony needs to be more rigorous and suggests cross-referencing accounts to identify inconsistencies, while also noting the interference by national security agencies to discredit witnesses.

The Abduction Phenomenon

The abduction phenomenon is a recurring topic. Dr. Salla criticizes the Jennings special for distorting this aspect, particularly by excluding Dr. John Mack's interview and focusing on Bud Hopkins, while also presenting the phenomenon as a product of sleep paralysis or unconscious trauma. Whitley Strieber describes the abduction phenomenon as real, invasive, and something that cannot be controlled, suggesting that the government's dismissal of it is due to the terrifying reality and their helplessness. He believes the visitors remain free to act as they will because the phenomenon is characterized as fringe cultism.

The Roswell Incident

The Roswell Incident is a central point of discussion and criticism. Dennis G. Balthaser expresses disappointment with the ABC special's presentation, noting the omission of the Mogul balloon theory's dismissal and the inadequate time given to Stanton Friedman. He criticizes the show for presenting the incident as a hoax and investigators as cultists. Whitley Strieber strongly refutes this characterization, calling it disinformation and sharing accounts from his uncle and General Arthur Exon, who allegedly confirmed the extraterrestrial origin of the Roswell debris. Strieber asserts that the Roswell Incident is the key to understanding humanity's current state of ignorance and isolation.

SETI and Alternative Explanations

Lan Fleming and others criticize the Jennings special for giving excessive airtime to SETI representatives, questioning their reliance on primitive radio signals for interstellar communication. Michio Kaku is highlighted as a positive point for suggesting the possibility of time travel and encouraging open-minded investigation, contrasting with the dismissive attitudes of some scientists.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the perceived shortcomings of mainstream media coverage of the UFO phenomenon, particularly the Peter Jennings Special. There is a strong emphasis on the validity and importance of witness testimony, whistleblower accounts, and rigorous investigative methodologies, often contrasted with what is seen as biased, superficial, or deliberately misleading reporting by television networks. The magazine's stance is clearly in favor of disclosure and a serious, open-minded investigation into UFOs and extraterrestrial contact, often positioning itself against what it views as establishment disinformation and a government cover-up. The Roswell Incident and the abduction phenomenon are presented as critical areas that have been misrepresented or downplayed by mainstream sources. The overall tone is one of frustration with the lack of progress in public understanding and a call for greater transparency and honesty regarding the UFO issue.

This issue of ALTERNATIVES, dated April 30th, 2005, features a critical examination of a Peter Jennings ABC special on UFOs, a detailed discussion of the UFO abduction phenomenon, a cryptozoology report, and a piece on a mysterious 1977 broadcast.

Critique of ABC's UFO Special

The issue opens with a strong condemnation of a Peter Jennings ABC program, labeling it a "canted partisan display" and "journalistic apostasy." The author expresses outrage that Stanton Friedman, a physicist with "many degrees and honors," was vilified, and that Jesse Marcel Jr. (son of the Roswell saucer finder) and Jesse Marcel Sr. (Intelligence Officer of the atomic bombing group) were not presented credibly. The program is criticized for mentioning only "thousands of physical trace cases" and "blacked out FOIA documents," and for implying that Dr. Hynek was the only scientist investigating the subject, ignoring the contributions of Dr. James McDonald. The author feels the program misrepresented ufologists as "money-grubbing sensationalists and opportunists" and "mentally ill, misinformed, or misinforming," while portraying skeptics as "hard nosed realists." The piece concludes that the program "hijacked the mainstream" and failed to encourage trust in government or media regarding the ET subject.

The Definitive Special About Alien Life... Has Yet to Be Made

By Will Bueche of the John E. Mack Institute, this article reviews the Peter Jennings special, noting that while it started with a "strong 20 or 30 minute introduction" and included a brief mention of Dr. Michio Kaku, it largely failed to deliver. The program is criticized for being "uninspired" after the initial segment, which acknowledged the weakness of early Air Force investigations. The author suggests the program missed an opportunity to explore contemporary theories in theoretical physics and consciousness, instead rehashing "theories of the 1970s." The article laments that "the definitive special about alien life has yet to be made."

Viewers Respond

Several web-sampled reactions to the Peter Jennings Special are included. One viewer thanks Dr. Kaku for his segment, criticizing the arrogance of scientists who believe they know the universe's workings. Another expresses disappointment over Dr. John Mack's interview being cut, noting that "abduction stuff was offered up, only to be coolly dismissed." A third viewer feels "experts" exhibit haughtiness and that "nobody knows" what is truly happening. The final comment suggests Jennings wants the audience and scientists to give the topics serious consideration.

Budd Hopkins' Stream List

Budd Hopkins details his experience being interviewed by Jennings' producers, claiming that "crucial points" he made on videotape, designed to "underline the physical reality of UFO abductions," were "suppressed ALL of these observations." He refutes the "sleep paralysis" explanation for abductions, citing cases where individuals were abducted while driving, fishing, or hunting, not lying paralyzed. Hopkins also claims the producers suppressed evidence of multiple witnesses with identical recollections, physical evidence like "scoop marks" and "ground landing traces," and the fact that many abduction reports are recalled without hypnosis. He states that Dr. David Jacobs' interview was also scrapped because it didn't fit the "sleep paralysis" agenda. Hopkins concludes that the producers deliberately "conceal[ed] the fact that within the mental health community there are many professionals who look with amusement on the 'sleep paralysis' theory, and who accept the physical reality of UFO abductions."

Cryptozoology Corner: Strange, terrifying creature seen in Garden pond

This section features an interview with Mrs. Gladys Ectoplasm, who recounts an encounter in her garden in Crewe. She describes hearing a commotion from her pond and seeing an "enormous fish lying in the pond." When asked about its size, she estimates it at "about 30 feet long." She then reveals the pond is only "about 6 feet long," and when questioned how the fish fit, she states, "Well it just seemed to." Later, she produces a goldfish bowl containing a goldfish, identifying it as her "relative, Gavin, our youngest." The interviewer expresses frustration at the wasted time, to which Mrs. Ectoplasm offers a "joint."

Alternatives: Kithra

Kithra discusses two events from 1977: the screening of the documentary "Alternative 3" and a strange incident in Southern England. The latter involved an unusual broadcast transmitted by unknown perpetrators, purportedly from outer space, by "GRAMAHA, the representative of the Asta Galactic Command." The message warned about the dangers of nuclear energy and atomic bombs, urging a cessation of their use and research, and promoting peace and evolution. The broadcast was received in an area with nuclear installations, including Aldermaston and Didcot. The message emphasized that "atomic energy is always directed against life" and that "all weapons of evil must be removed."

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue include media bias and sensationalism in reporting on UFOs and alien life, the suppression of evidence by mainstream media, and the validity of UFO abduction experiences. The editorial stance is highly critical of media coverage that dismisses or distorts ufological research, advocating for a more open and serious investigation of the phenomenon. There is a strong defense of ufologists and their research, and a call for scientists to engage with the subject without prejudice. The cryptozoology section, while humorous, also touches on the unusual and unexplained.

This issue of UFO Magazine, spanning pages 51-60, covers a range of topics related to UFOs, conspiracies, and unexplained phenomena, with a particular focus on the "Alternative 3" broadcast and book, mysterious events in London, UFO lighting, and the Roswell Incident.

Alternative 3: Hoax or Hidden Truth?

The issue begins by exploring the "Alternative 3" phenomenon, a television programme and subsequent book that suggested a secret plan to escape a dying Earth. The author questions why the initial message, purportedly from extraterrestrials, was only heard in a small part of the UK. Suggestions include it being a hoax related to the 'Age of Aquarius' concept and the desire of ETs to help humanity with pollution and radiation, rather than dictating actions. The "Alternative 3" programme, aired by Anglia TV in June 1977, was initially planned as an April Fool's joke but was postponed. It was broadcast in several countries but not the USA, leading to viewer outrage. The premise involved global warming making Earth uninhabitable, secret bases on Mars and the Moon, and the forced relocation of people, with some becoming slave labour. The article notes that many eminent UK scientists were leaving for America (the 'Brain Drain') and some were dying mysteriously around this time.

The writers of the programme were David Ambrose, Christopher Miles, and Leslie Watkins. Bob Grodin was a pseudonym for a real American astronaut. The programme's storyline included a 1962 landing on Mars, intelligent life in the universe, and secret bases on Mars and the Moon. It claimed that physicists, chemists, and biologists were spirited away to these bases by a conspiracy involving the UK, USA, and Russian governments, while ordinary people were sent to the Moon as slave labour.

A report suggests that the Jason Society held a 1957 conference where scientists believed the world would self-destruct around 2000 due to overpopulation and environmental degradation. This led to three recommendations: Alternative 1 (ending pollution by blasting holes in the ozone layer), Alternative 2 (digging underground cities for the elite), and Alternative 3 (building spaceships to take the elite to the Moon and Mars).

When the programme aired, viewers were told it was a hoax, comparing it to Orson Welles' "War of the Worlds." The following year, Leslie Watkins wrote a book expanding on the TV programme, with Ambrose and Miles credited for co-authorship. While not intended as factual, the book is described as "fiction based on fact," with Watkins feeling he had "inadvertently got very close to a secret truth."

Linda Moulton Howe is quoted as discussing the programme's origins with a BBC producer, who mentioned it began as a documentary on the British 'brain drain' of the 1970s, with scientists disappearing. An interview with a publisher of the book suggests the entire project was a hoax. William (Bill) Cooper also used the ideas of Alternative 3 in his conspiracy theories. Watkins stated that "Bob Grodin" was a friend of his and involved in the Kennedy assassination cover-up, and that the astronaut supposedly committed suicide in 1978. Cooper believes the book contains disinformation intended to discredit the "Alternative 3" exposé.

Further articles and links are provided for deeper exploration, with one suggesting that men who travelled to the Moon had knowledge of Alternative 3. The author concludes that the mystery of whether Alternative 3 was fact or fiction persists, and is unlikely to be solved without 'Disclosure'.

Mystery Boom Heard in London

This section reports on a series of mysterious booms heard in Camden Town, London, on March 5, 2005. Numerous calls were received by dispatchers, with the affected area being downtown between Glade and Cherry Streets. Hazardous materials coordinator Shorn Inclined could not definitively rule out a small earthquake or sonic booms. Tyler Clark, chief geologist at the London earthquake monitoring service, noted the lack of earth-measuring equipment and stated that London has never had an earthquake, dismissing the event as "twaddle" but predicting it would become a mystery. Clark also mentioned that similar events had occurred in the area for the past five years. Dave Slow, air traffic manager at Heathrow Airport, stated that sonic booms from planes leaving or landing would not match the reported sound, as planes would be too slow. City public utilities officials considered and ruled out a methane explosion in a sewer. Ron Holeintheground, deputy director of City-County Utilities, stated that an explosion would require a release of pressure elsewhere, but no such reports existed. Shoshi Toshi, owner of an Indian takeaway, humorously suggested the booms were caused by customers responding to their extra-strong curries, calling them "very loud farts" and mentioning a sweepstake for the loudest.

UFO Recognition Part 2: UFO Lighting

Written by William F. Hamilton, this article discusses how UFOs sighted at night can be identified by their lighting. It contrasts UFO lights with those of commercial and military aircraft, which adhere to FAA regulations. Aircraft position lights are red (left) and green (right), with a white rear light, and have specific chromaticity coordinates. Anti-collision light systems must cover a wide field and flash between 40 and 100 cycles per minute, typically in aviation red or white. UFOs, however, have been observed with a variety of colors including red, green, blue, orange, and yellow, in different positions and configurations, sometimes mimicking aircraft lights but often with varying flash frequencies. The article notes that internally lighted blimps have also been mistaken for UFOs. Specific sightings are described, including a yellowish-orange non-blinking light on a circular object in Ohio, and blue, round lights near the ground in Massachusetts. Another sighting in Monterrey, Mexico, described a green Flying Triangle with bright green lights, and other saucer-shaped UFOs with flashing red and blue lights.

Threats to Roswell Witnesses---WHY?

This section investigates why military and civilian witnesses to the 1947 Roswell Incident were allegedly threatened for discussing their experiences. The author notes that research into these threats began in the 1970s and continues to gather statements from children of civilian employees at the Roswell Army Airfield in 1947. The threats varied in intensity, with those who knew more reportedly facing more severe threats. Maj. Jesse Marcel reportedly told his wife and son not to speak about what they had seen. The granddaughter of Sheriff George Wilcox stated that military police warned her grandparents that if they ever talked about the incident, they would be killed, along with their entire family. Sheriff Wilcox did not run for re-election, and his wife lost her bid for the position.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the nature of truth, deception, and the potential for hidden realities behind official narratives. The "Alternative 3" segment questions the line between fiction and fact, suggesting that even fictional accounts can contain elements of truth. The "Mystery Boom" article highlights unexplained phenomena that defy easy categorization. The "UFO Lighting" section emphasizes the importance of careful observation and comparison with known phenomena, while also acknowledging the unusual characteristics of reported UFOs. The "Roswell Threats" piece directly addresses the idea of a cover-up, implying that the suppression of information suggests the existence of something significant to hide. The overall stance appears to be one of critical inquiry into unexplained events and alleged conspiracies, encouraging readers to question official explanations and consider alternative possibilities.

This issue of UFO Universe, dated November 2005 (Vol. 10, No. 11), features a cover story about India's potential extraterrestrial visitation and a report on the threats and secrecy surrounding the 1947 Roswell Incident. The magazine also includes an interview with author Lisette Larkins, who discusses her experiences with alien contact and reframes them as a path to spiritual growth.

Roswell Incident: Threats and Secrecy

The article details the intimidation and threats faced by individuals connected to the 1947 Roswell Incident. Frank Joyce of KGFL radio received a call from a Pentagon officer warning him of severe repercussions if he broadcast an interview with ranch foreman Mack Brazel, even threatening their FCC license. Brazel himself was taken into custody and reportedly sworn to secrecy, with his son Bill Jr. stating his father never spoke of it again. Frankie Rowe, daughter of a Roswell firefighter, recalled military personnel warning her that if she spoke about the events, she and her family could be taken into the desert and never found. Lt. Governor Joseph Montoya, who allegedly saw crashed craft debris and bodies, was told by Ruben Anaya to forget what he saw, as it was "too dangerous" and the FBI would "do away with you." Military personnel like "Pappy" Henderson, Edwin Easley, Sheridan Cavitt, and Bill Ricket were also sworn to secrecy. The article highlights the significant threats made to Glenn Dennis, a mortician, by military police and a Captain who warned him he would be "picking your bones out of the sand" if he didn't leave the base medical facility.

Dennis G. Balthaser, the author of this section, concludes that these threats indicate the extreme importance of the Roswell event, suggesting it was unrelated to balloons or test dummies. He notes that many witnesses had no reason to embellish their accounts and that the threats underscore the significance of the incident.

India's Extraterrestrial Contact and Technology

A report from New Delhi by Rashid Rabbitveryfast details a claim that an alien race has made contact with the Indian government, offering to share advanced technology. This exchange is said to propel India into a leading position in the universe. The proposed alien technology includes a "strange box with a screen" for viewing images from the heavens, a portable communication device similar to a telephone, a tubular device that emits light, and a "thin plate of glass like material" described as a "mirror" which could aid in developing the nation's first bomb. In return for this technology, the aliens reportedly request permission for "abductions" for "friendly medical examinations" and to examine cattle. The names of individuals selected for examination would be provided to the government, potentially eliminating the need for vaccinations under their health program.

Interview with Lisette Larkins: Abduction as Spiritual Growth

An interview with author Lisette Larkins, who has written books such as "Talking to Extraterrestrials," explores her experiences with alien contact. Larkins, described as a "New Age author," emphasizes self-empowerment and taking back jurisdiction over one's life. She discusses the initial trauma and confusion associated with her experiences, including losing custody of her son and spending time in a psychiatric hospital. However, she reframes these events as a catalyst for spiritual growth and a deeper understanding of universal relationships.

Larkins challenges the conventional view of abductions as victimisation, suggesting that individuals have a role in their experiences, often stemming from soul agreements made prior to incarnation. She argues that trauma can be a part of a Divine plan for soul growth, and that by shifting from terror to curiosity, one can transform negative experiences into positive ones. She uses the metaphor of a dog's reaction to veterinary procedures to illustrate how perceived victimisation can be a misinterpretation of necessary experiences for growth. Larkins believes that as humanity evolves, the "veil of forgetfulness" is lifting, allowing for a greater acceptance of paranormal phenomena and a deeper understanding of our connections with extraterrestrial beings.

She asserts that our attitude determines our experience and that by embracing our spiritual nature, we can understand that we are "universal beings" capable of sophisticated relationships, including those with ETs. Larkins encourages people to take responsibility for their experiences, to stop viewing themselves as victims, and to recognize that their soul has orchestrated these events for growth.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue of UFO Universe appears to maintain a stance that takes claims of UFO phenomena, alien contact, and related experiences seriously, while also exploring deeper psychological and spiritual interpretations. The Roswell Incident section focuses on the tangible evidence of intimidation and secrecy, suggesting a significant event occurred. The report on India highlights the potential for advanced alien technology and the implications for global power dynamics. The interview with Lisette Larkins introduces a more esoteric perspective, emphasizing personal responsibility, spiritual evolution, and the reinterpretation of potentially traumatic experiences as opportunities for growth. The magazine seems to encourage readers to consider a wide range of possibilities, from government cover-ups to profound spiritual awakenings, related to UFO phenomena.

This issue of UFO Magazine, dated May 1999 (Volume 14, No. 3), features a cover headline proclaiming "THEY ARE HERE! The truth about alien contact and the government cover-up." The cover also prominently displays three books by author Lisette Larkins: "Talking to Extraterrestrials," "Listening to Extraterrestrials," and "Calling on Extraterrestrials." The magazine is published by UFO Magazine and has an ISSN of 1072-0473, with a cover price of $4.99.

Interview with Lisette Larkins

The magazine includes an extensive interview with Lisette Larkins, who discusses her views on personal growth, spiritual empowerment, and extraterrestrial contact. Larkins emphasizes that life presents constant challenges for soul growth, and individuals must actively counter societal "brain washing" that diminishes their sense of empowerment. She advocates for continuous learning, inspiration, and self-empowerment, suggesting that true growth comes from within rather than external validation.

Larkins shares her perspective on UFO phenomena, stating that she believes extraterrestrial beings (ETs) are communicating directly with people, bypassing governments. She asserts that governments are not the primary source of information regarding ETs and that individuals are the "leaders" in this unfolding scenario. She criticizes the notion of waiting for government disclosure, encouraging people to embrace their own experiences and seek information directly.

Regarding her personal experiences, Larkins recounts how her contact with ETs seemed to pause when she was hospitalized, suggesting a joint decision for her well-being. She describes experiencing colored flashes of light, which she has learned to interpret over time. Larkins posits that extraterrestrial beings, like angels, possess a deep understanding and telepathic abilities, accessing universal information.

She addresses the question of future ET interaction, suggesting it will be an individual experience rather than a mass event. Larkins uses the example of a large craft seen in New York City, which only a few people noticed, illustrating how awareness levels affect perception. She draws parallels to historical accounts, like Magellan's ships, where unfamiliar phenomena were initially unseen.

Larkins reflects on her journey, noting that her initial judgmental reactions to UFO claims have evolved into compassion through personal growth. She emphasizes that reactions to UFOs are a reflection of the observer's soul and their stage of growth, not a personal attack.

She also touches upon the idea of universal beings and the challenges of remembering this status in a world that often emphasizes external authority. Larkins believes that the Earth is a significant place for this awakening and that individuals must stop relying on governments or parental figures for direction, recognizing their own empowered nature and capacity for relationships with other worldly beings.

Did a UFO Crash in Rural Southeast Missouri in 1941?

This section presents a reader-submitted article investigating a potential UFO crash in rural Southeast Missouri in 1941. The author, through genealogical research, uncovered a connection between their father's history and a local legend of a UFO crash and retrieval. The investigation delves into the author's father's potential association with Parks Air College and the Sikeston Missouri Institute of Aeronautics in 1941. However, written verification is difficult due to merged records and a fire at the National Personnel Records Centre.

The author references an abstract titled "The First Roswell" by Ryan Wood, which discusses an interview with Charlotte Mann. Mann's recollections, supported by affidavits, mention her grandfather, Reverend William Huffman, a Baptist minister who reportedly witnessed a crashed spaceship in 1941. The incident allegedly involved local military personnel who swore secrecy, and the wreckage was rumored to have been sent to Chicago for study, possibly involving scientists like Einstein.

Further investigation revealed that the UFO retrieval personnel might have been associated with the 309th of the Sikeston Missouri Institute of Aeronautics. A magnifying glass revealed a patch on the author's father's uniform sleeve that matched this designation. The article also notes that two Sikeston residents, independently, recalled talk of the 1941 incident at the same unpublished location outside of Cape Girardeau.

Another unsettling detail is the story of an individual who claimed to have transported the remains of "little people" from a downed spaceship, with the term UFO not being in common use in 1941. An employee relative of the Missouri Institute of Aeronautics mentioned that unusual crashes were never discussed, and secrecy was paramount. A story is recounted about a large Army Air Force plane that landed at the base, with strict orders for personnel to stay away.

Adding to the mystery, the Sikeston Fire Department reported that a flooded basement damaged their 1941 records, and the damaged records were subsequently destroyed. The article also mentions the history of the 62nd Army Air Force Flying Training Detachment and a "re-working of records" related to the 309th designation. Finally, it notes that the May 8, 1941, Sikeston Herald had two and a half columns blacked out.

The article concludes by asking readers if they or a family member were associated with the Missouri Institute of Aeronautics in 1941 and provides contact information for further information.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue strongly emphasizes themes of direct personal experience and empowerment in understanding UFO phenomena, moving away from reliance on official channels or government disclosures. The interview with Lisette Larkins champions a spiritual and individualistic approach to growth and contact, suggesting that individuals possess the innate capacity to connect with higher consciousness and extraterrestrial intelligence. The article on the 1941 Missouri incident highlights the challenges of uncovering historical truths due to secrecy, lost records, and the difficulty of verifying accounts, while still presenting intriguing evidence and coincidences. The overall stance appears to be one of encouraging open-minded investigation and personal discovery, questioning established narratives, and empowering the reader to seek their own understanding of UFOs and consciousness.