UFO Review - Issue 06

Magazine Overview

Title: UFO REVIEW
Issue Date: November 2004
Issue Number: 6

This issue of UFO Review presents a collection of articles and interviews covering a range of topics, with a strong emphasis on scientific theories related to the origin of life and space exploration, alongside more traditional UFO and Fortean subjects.

In This Issue

The "IN THIS ISSUE" section on page 2 outlines the content:

• Welcome: An introduction from the editor, apologizing for the late publication and announcing a combined "bumper" edition for December/January.
• An interview with the greatest living scientist on this planet at the moment: An interview with Professor Chandra Wickramasinghe, a proponent of Panspermia.
• The Manchester Bang: A discussion of a UFO case, with a skeptical viewpoint presented.
• Whose are these?: A brief, somewhat cryptic entry about "Body parts."
• The Lost Land of Lyonesse: An article by Kithra, who has changed her mind about persuading readers to stay away from Cornwall.
• Review of Probe International Conference: The editor's account of attending a conference.
• Fortean Corner: Featuring a first article from new reporter Miss B. Osom, titled "My Talking Zit."
• The Science and Politics of Mars: An article by Pikey about the Red Planet.
• Linda Mouldy Bread shoots dead another wicked Chupra: A day in the life of an intrepid reporter.
• The Mysterious Origins Of Einstein's Theory Of Relativity: An unelaborated title.

Page 3 adds further content:

• Roger Anderton writes exclusively about the great man, his work and the people in his life: An article about an unspecified "great man."
• Grandma's on the Telly: A reminder of a past event involving the IBA's southern transmitters.
• ET Reality – another scientist speaks: An article featuring an interview with Max Burns about the "Blue Hare Hoax," prison, and his opinions on Dave Clarke and Andy Roberts.

Editorial and Main Features

Welcome (Page 3): The editor begins by apologizing for the delay, attributing it to people letting them down. Plans for a combined December/January "bumper" issue are announced, which will include "a bit of scrap metal attached."

Contentious Issue (Page 4): The editor describes the current issue as "fairly contentious." A significant portion is dedicated to an interview with Professor Chandra Wickramasinghe on Panspermia, which the editor feels is "so obviously the answer as to how we got here."

The editor also discusses an interview with Max Burns, which is described as "a bit strong," in response to a previous interview with Andy Roberts.

Andrew Pike's article, "The Science and Politics of Mars," is highlighted as being "of a depressing note." It references the CIA's involvement in the release of Mars Lander pictures and the possible reasons for non-disclosure, such as a belief that the public couldn't "take it." The editor speculates on whether this relates to the existence of intelligent extraterrestrial life, human origins, or the existence of God.

The editor addresses the dismissal of a reporter named Dam Acne, who was sacked for "pecuniary deception" related to an article on "The Wild Man of Biggleswade." Miss B. Osom is introduced as the replacement reporter.

An Interview With The Greatest Living Scientist On This Planet At The Moment (Pages 5-10): This is the central feature, an interview with Professor Chandra Wickramasinghe. The editor expresses great pleasure and honor in interviewing him.

Professor Wickramasinghe discusses his work on the theory of Panspermia (also referred to as Cosmic Ancestry). He explains that the idea of life being transferred across the universe is not new, but he and Sir Fred Hoyle revisited it. Their work began with studying interstellar and cometary dust. They found that the prevailing theory of dust being composed of ice particles was inadequate and proposed that it was largely carbon-based, specifically organic polymers.

Over time, their research indicated that these organic particles matched the chemical composition of bacteria to a remarkable degree. This led them to question the Earth as the sole origin of life, given the improbability of life arising spontaneously. They concluded that the origin of life likely involved the importation of complex organic building blocks from comets and potentially from the wider universe.

Wickramasinghe recounts the opposition they faced, particularly when suggesting that organic molecules could survive in space. He mentions that while publishing papers on the building blocks of life from space was accepted, suggesting life itself came from space was more controversial. He notes that scientists like Carl Sagan and his collaborators initially opposed these ideas.

The interview details how spectroscopy revealed vast quantities of organic dust in space, with a significant portion matching bacterial signatures. While some critics suggested inorganic origins for these particles, Wickramasinghe argues that the evidence strongly supports a biological connection.

He acknowledges that his theory challenged deeply entrenched scientific beliefs, likening the opposition to a "pre-Copernican position." Despite the initial intensity of the opposition, he believes the ideas of Panspermia are now more widely discussed and accepted as a valid theory for the origin of life.

Other Articles:

• Roger Anderton writes about a "great man," his work, and his life (Page 3).
• "Grandma's on the Telly" recalls an event in the 1970s where the IBA's southern transmitters were taken over, causing mayhem (Page 3).
• "ET Reality – another scientist speaks" features an interview with Max Burns, discussing the "Blue Hare Hoax," his prison experiences, and his critical views on Dave Clarke and Andy Roberts (Page 3).
• "The Science and Politics of Mars" by Andrew Pike (Page 4) touches on the CIA's role in releasing Mars Lander images and the implications for understanding extraterrestrial life and human origins.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently explores themes of extraterrestrial life, the origins of life, and unconventional scientific theories. The editor expresses a strong belief in Professor Wickramasinghe's theory of Panspermia, viewing it as a "fact" and a significant development in science. There is a critical stance towards skepticism, particularly regarding UFO phenomena, as seen in the "Manchester Bang" entry. The editorial also touches upon government secrecy and its potential implications for our understanding of life and the universe. The publication seems to embrace controversial or fringe scientific ideas, positioning itself as a platform for alternative perspectives.

This issue of UFO ROUNDUP, Volume 9, Number 43, dated October 27, 2004, features an in-depth interview with Professor Chandra Wickramasinghe and a report on the 'Manchester Bang' incident. The magazine is published by World Scientific Pub Co Inc and includes details about the book 'A Journey with Fred Hoyle: The Search for Cosmic Life'.

Interview with Professor Chandra Wickramasinghe

The interview, conducted by SM, explores Professor Wickramasinghe's theories on the origin and spread of life. He aligns his views with Darwinism but emphasizes that evolution must be considered within the context of a continuous input of genetic material from space, primarily from comets.

Origin of Life and Comets

Wickramasinghe posits that life emerged on Earth almost immediately after it became habitable, suggesting it was introduced by comets. He states that comets were responsible for bringing both the oceans and the primitive atmosphere to Earth. This process is ongoing, with approximately 100 tons of cometary debris entering Earth's atmosphere daily, some of which contains viable microorganisms.

Cosmic Evolution and Panspermia

He argues that the evolution of life is not confined to Earth and that genetic programs for higher evolution are formed in space, possibly within comets or on planets. This leads to the conclusion that the universe must be teeming with life, and that life on Earth is intimately connected with life everywhere else. He mentions two papers published in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society that discuss these ideas, indicating that the publication of Panspermia research is becoming more accepted.

Intelligent Life and the Gaia Theory

Wickramasinghe suggests that intelligent life elsewhere could be very different but intimately interconnected with life on Earth, guided by the same cosmic genetic programs. He is a supporter of Lovelock's Gaia theory, viewing the planet as an interconnected ecological entity, and extends this concept to the entire universe as a 'Gaia-type entity'.

Directed Panspermia and Artificial Construct

When questioned about whether the universe's arrangements are coincidental or arranged, Wickramasinghe admits to wondering about it. While he, as a reductionist scientist, would prefer to believe in random processes, he acknowledges that if the transformation from non-life to life is virtually impossible through inorganic means, then the spectrum of living systems in the universe might be an intelligent artificial construct. He refers to this as a form of directed Panspermia.

Life on Mars and Other Celestial Bodies

Wickramasinghe expresses no doubt that life exists on Mars, citing the 1976 Viking explorations and recent methane detection as strong indicators. He believes life will also be discovered in comets and on moons like Europa. He attributes NASA's conservatism regarding announcing life on Mars to financial considerations, suggesting that confirming life would make it harder to secure funding for future research.

Social and Theological Implications

He anticipates profound social implications from the discovery of widespread cosmic life, potentially reducing humanity's self-importance and fostering a new world view. This also raises questions about God and theological issues, potentially leading to new religions. He also speculates that viruses like SARS might have an extraterrestrial origin, appearing east of the Himalayas due to atmospheric filtering.

Challenges and Pursuit of Truth

Wickramasinghe acknowledges facing ridicule for his ideas but emphasizes the importance of self-criticism and following the path to truth. He expresses concern about a current climate where the search for objective truth is overshadowed by socio-political ambitions, which he sees as a cause for societal decline. He recounts being asked to testify at an Arkansas Creation trial in the early 1980s, where he argued that Earth-bound evolution alone did not explain the phenomenon of life, and faced hostility and death threats.

The Manchester Bang

This section, written by Stuart Miller, reports on an event in Worsley, Manchester, on Wednesday, October 13, 2004. A loud explosion was heard, initially suspected to be a methane explosion from old coal mines. Local residents and police investigated the area, including Botany Bay woods and Worsley Moss, but found nothing.

UFO Investigation and Explanations

Local radio stations invited explanations, and various organizations, including the British Geological Society and the Ministry of Defence, were consulted. Midwife Jeanette Vagg reported seeing two balls of fire falling in the atmosphere. While the most logical conclusion suggested by the author was that these were small meteorites burning up, local researcher Steve Balon promoted the idea that a UFO had landed.

UFO Roundup Report

A separate report from UFO ROUNDUP details Stephen F. Balon's investigation into the Manchester explosion, calling it potentially the biggest UFO story in the British Isles since the Boyle, Ireland crash in 1995. The explosion was heard over a wide area, and Balon is pursuing the UFO crash theory.

Book Review: A Journey with Fred Hoyle

Page 18 features information about the book 'A Journey with Fred Hoyle: The Search for Cosmic Life' by Chandra Wickramasinghe, edited by Kamala Wickramasinghe, with a foreword by Sir Arthur C. Clarke. The book, published by World Scientific Pub Co Inc in November 2004, traces the scientific collaboration between Hoyle and Wickramasinghe, their organic theory of cosmic dust, and their postulation that life on Earth has its origins in space. It highlights their battle with the scientific establishment and the process of radical ideas gaining acceptance.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The issue strongly advocates for the theory of Panspermia and the extraterrestrial origin of life, challenging conventional scientific paradigms. It highlights the work of Fred Hoyle and Chandra Wickramasinghe, presenting their ideas as groundbreaking and eventually accepted by the scientific community. The 'Manchester Bang' report, while offering a skeptical meteorological explanation, also entertains the possibility of a UFO event, reflecting the magazine's focus on UFO phenomena and related mysteries. The interview with Wickramasinghe reveals a deep conviction in the interconnectedness of life throughout the universe and a critical view of scientific and societal resistance to new ideas.

Title: UFO Review
Issue: 9
Volume: 42
Date: October 20, 2004
Publisher: UFO Review
Country: UK
Language: English

Worley Incident Investigation

The issue begins by detailing an incident that occurred in Worley, near Manchester, UK, on October 15, 2004. The initial report in the Manchester Evening News described an explosion, initially attributed to an earthquake. However, the British Geological Survey found no seismic disturbance. Investigator Balon claims that a UFO crashed in a wood near Worley, leading to the site being cordoned off by uniformed and plainclothes police for several days. Balon states he has been investigating the case for days and is certain of what happened.

Further reports from the Manchester Evening News are cited, including one where a woman driving home saw two fireball-type objects with flames coming off them in the sky. Dozens of individuals sent comments to the newspaper's website with their explanations. An astronomer from Jodrell Bank observatory suggested a bolide or meteor caused the explosion, describing it as the size of 'a hazel nut or a tennis ball.' A witness on the Isle of Man, 100 miles away, also reported seeing the objects.

Eyewitness accounts describe uniformed police officers walking around a wood in Worley. A motorist stopped near the motorway exit for Worley due to hearing the huge explosion saw smoke coming from the wood. Another witness reported seeing dozens of police vehicles all over Worley centre and the park on Friday morning, October 15, 2004.

Additionally, a woman in Bury reported seeing four RAF Tornado fighter jets flying at a very low level, heading towards the Salford-Manchester area on the day of the explosion.

Parallels to the Boyle Case

The article draws parallels between the Worley incident and the 'Boyle case' from 1995. In that incident, a daylight disc reportedly crash-landed north of a lake in Boyle, County Roscommon, Ireland. NATO troops and the Irish national police (Gardai) allegedly surrounded and cordoned off the crash site, and five extraterrestrial survivors were reportedly captured and taken to Shannon International Airport, then airlifted to the USA and incarcerated at Camp Condon.

Balon questions whether something significant was found in the Worley wood, leading to a potential 'D Notice' (a form of censorship) by the UK's Ministry of Defence.

Stephen F. Balon's Background

Stephen F. Balon is introduced as a former DIGAP member with over 40 years of research experience in UFOs, the paranormal, crop circles, and anomalies. He is described as a noted lecturer who has appeared on TV and was a colleague of the late Arthur Tomlinson, with whom he investigated the Ilkely Moor UFO case. Balon has also written extensively on the Silpho Moor UFO case.

The Lost Land of Lyonesse

The magazine then shifts focus to the legend of Lyonesse, described as Cornwall's own Atlantis. According to The Saxon Chronicle, Lyonesse was obliterated on November 11, 1099, when the sea inundated the land, drowning towns, people, and animals. Other references suggest dates of 1089 or sometime during the 6th Century AD. The myth of a lost land persists, possibly as a folk memory of dry land that once existed, supported by geological evidence of past sea level changes.

Legend states that the Isles of Scilly are the only remaining parts of Lyonesse. During the reign of Maximus in the 4th Century AD, the Isles of Scilly were recorded as a single island. Lyonesse is said to have contained 140 villages and churches, and fishermen reportedly find parts of old buildings in their nets. Some claim to hear church bells ringing from beneath the sea during storms. An ex-mayor of Wilton reported seeing domes, towers, spires, and fortifications beneath the sea from the cliffs at Lands End, and a News Chronicle journalist in the 1930s claimed to be woken by the sound of muffled bells.

Geological and Archaeological Evidence

The Seven Stone Rocks are believed by fishermen to be the remains of a city called 'The Town.' Sunken forest remains are visible at low tide in Mount's Bay. St. Michael's Mount in Mount's Bay is noted to have an old Cornish name meaning 'the hoar rock in the wood.' The Isles of Scilly are considered the old hilltops of Lyonesse, with remains of ancient stone buildings and megalithic structures visible below the high-tide mark. Geologically, the Isles of Scilly are made from granite similar to Cornwall's.

Professor Charles Thomas's archaeological model of the Isles of Scilly suggests that while the islands have been separated from mainland Britain for thousands of years, the shallow water between them means that a fall of only 10 meters would unite most of them, except St. Agnes and the Western Rocks. Scilly is thus seen as a drowned landscape with submerged causeways and field boundaries.

Dr. B. P. Horton from Durham University suggests that the legend of Lyonesse may stem from ancient folk memories of Neolithic inundations around the Cornish coast and the history of the Isles of Scilly.

Lyonesse and Global Catastrophes

The article links the legend of Lyonesse to other submerged land myths, including the Breton story of the drowning of Caer Ys. It references an article that examines ancient catastrophes and survivors, questioning if the inundation of Lyonesse and similar events off the coast of Wales in the mid-sixth century AD were part of a larger global catastrophe, possibly caused by comet impacts.

An article by Andrew Rothovius examines the idea of a comet impact on Earth around 534 AD, supported by dendrochronology data, which caused abnormally low temperatures for 15-20 years in the Northern Hemisphere. This impact might have been a fragment of Halley's Comet, seen in September 530 AD. This timeframe aligns with the 'Celtic traditions of the submergence of three large coastal areas in Cornwall, Wales and Brittany,' including Lyonesse, the Lost Land of Cantref in Cardigan Bay, Wales, and the lost city of Ys.

However, contemporary historical sources like Gildas and Nennius do not mention such flooding events. Tacitus notes that Romans had to cross the Menai Straits to reach Anglesey during its conquest.

Old Maps and Atlantis

Old maps suggest that the Isles of Scilly were a single island in Roman times. Nigel Pennick's book 'Lost Lands and Sunken Cities' notes that large tracts of coastal land have vanished from mainland Britain over the last two thousand years.

Andrew Collins's article, 'Atlantis in Northern Europe,' explores the link between this region and Plato's Atlantis. He references 'The Oera Linda Book' (1876), which purported to be a translation of a 13th Century Frisian text describing an ancient land called Atland or Aldland in the North Sea, destroyed by floods in 2,193 BC. This book was dismissed as a hoax by academics.

Trevelyan Legend

A persistent legend states that a man who escaped the inundation of Lyonesse on his white horse founded the Cornish family of Trevelyan. Their family crest still features a white horse, symbolizing his ride to higher ground at Perranuthnoe.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The issue explores themes of UFO sightings and potential crashes, historical legends of lost lands and submerged civilizations, and the possibility of ancient global catastrophes. The editorial stance appears to be one of open inquiry into unexplained phenomena and historical mysteries, while also acknowledging the potential for rumor and misinterpretation, as suggested by the concluding remarks on how the 'rumour mill takes hold' and the possibility of making 'monstrous fools of ourselves.'

This issue of PROBE INTERNATIONAL, identified as a 'Conference Report' from Saturday 09th and Sunday 10th October 2004, spans pages 31-40. The magazine delves into a variety of topics, including ancient legends, geographical phenomena, and scientific controversies, with a strong focus on the unusual and unexplained.

Lyonesse and Arthurian Legends

The issue begins by exploring the legend of Lyonesse, a sunken land, and its potential connection to similar events during the 1953 and 1978 flood disasters in East Anglia. It provides several external links for readers to learn more about the legend and its archaeological remains. The relevance of Lyonesse to Arthurian legends, particularly the story of Tristan, is discussed, with a focus on seeking real evidence for the sunken land. A list of links is provided for those interested in the Arthurian connections.

Ritual Landscapes & Ley Lines

Another significant aspect explored is Lyonesse's connection to the St. Michael Ley Line. This line is described as running from St. Michael's Mount off the coast of Penzance, Cornwall, to the coast near Bury St. Edmunds in East Anglia, with a proposed start from Mont St. Michel in France. The article highlights that many of Britain's megalithic monuments are found along this Ley Line. Additional links are provided to explain geomancy and ritual landscapes, including Ley Lines, also known as Dragon Paths. The article also touches upon the idea of a 'Dimensional Shift' and its potential connection to Crop Circles and UFOs, suggesting a link between these phenomena and Ley Lines, possibly part of a global Ley Line that once passed through Lyonesse.

Ancient Myths and Catastrophism

The issue delves into ancient cultures and their myths, suggesting that these narratives may describe real events using the concepts understood at the time. It discusses the 'Feminine Principle,' the 'Fisher King,' and the 'Umer' ET group from the Pleiades. The article references a book by Danny Sullivan on Ley Lines and explores topics such as 'Sky Gods and Megaliths,' the 'Dragon Cult and Chaos in the Firmament,' and 'The Celestial Tower and Wars of the Gods and the Titans.' A significant section is dedicated to 'Catastrophism,' discussing theories of Earth's history, including the biblical and scientific perspectives, asteroid impacts, and the ideas of Immanuel Velikovsky, supported by astronomers Victor Clube and William Napier. A quote from a site discussing the 'Cosmic Serpent: A Catastrophist View of Earth History' emphasizes the secrets held within pyramids and megaliths, suggesting they are witnesses to a time of cosmic chaos and mankind's escape from an 'Armageddon.' The 'Fiery God of the Megaliths' section examines scientific findings about stone circles and astronomical data.

UFOs and Strange Phenomena

Under the 'UFOS' section, the issue mentions a forum thread discussing Lyonesse, underwater bases off the Cornish coast, 'Wurst' shaped UFO sightings, natiform tazza sightings between 1958 and 1960, and the sinking of the Trewlany in 1946. The author notes difficulty in finding further references to these events.

Conference Report: Probe International 2004

The latter part of the magazine features a detailed report on the Probe International Conference held on October 9th and 10th, 2004, in St. Annes. The author, attending with a cold, describes the venue (YMCA gymnasium), the approximate attendance (140 people), and the general atmosphere as positive and attentive. The report covers several speakers:

• Malcolm Robinson: Presented the Fife case, leaving the audience to form their own conclusions, though Philip Mantle questioned his presentation.
• Graeme Mudie: Described as a 'mad scientist' but actually a sensible BT engineer interested in anti-gravity and hydrogen-powered cars. He gave a demonstration of an object lifting.
• Brian Allan: Spoke about the connection between science and the paranormal, with the author finding about 80% acceptable and 20% questionable.
• John Rhodes: Presented a dynamic talk convincing the audience about the existence of 'reptoids' living underground. The author found his presentation highly professional and enjoyable, though not entirely convincing.

The report commends the hosts, Sam and Jean, for their professionalism and the well-arranged roster of speakers.

'My Talking Zit' - A Fortean Tale

A humorous piece titled 'My Talking Zit' by Miss B. Osom recounts the strange case of Noella Ofanidea, an abductee who developed a talking zit on her arm. The zit claimed to be Professor Chris French, diagnosing her experiences as sleep paralysis. Noella ultimately dealt with the zit by piercing it, ending the phenomenon.

The Science and Politics of Mars

Authored by Andrew Pike, this section critically examines the images of Mars released following the 2003 encounter. The author was informed by a US contact that NASA and the CIA were manipulating the images to hide evidence of life, such as green areas and methane gas. The article suggests that color charts in the images were deliberately altered, making Mars appear red when it was actually a 'brown' color. It questions why NASA would fake images, citing the Viking images from 1976 as also appearing red. The author concludes that 'black propaganda' is at play and discusses the renewed interest in the idea of life being transported to Mars following the discovery of fossil life in Martian rock ALH 84001 in 1996.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue include the exploration of ancient legends and their potential connection to real events, the investigation of unusual geographical and energetic phenomena like Ley Lines, and the critical examination of official narratives, particularly concerning UFOs and space exploration (Mars). The magazine appears to adopt a stance that encourages questioning established beliefs and exploring alternative explanations for phenomena, often referencing online resources and fringe theories. The 'Fortean Corner' section explicitly states its aim to 'totally take the piss' on the stranger side of life, indicating a willingness to engage with the bizarre and humorous aspects of the unexplained. The overall tone suggests an interest in uncovering hidden truths and challenging conventional scientific and historical interpretations.

This document is an extract from the book "Beyond Genesis" by Andrew Pike, due for publication in 2005. It focuses on the scientific and political controversies surrounding the ALH 84001 meteorite, which was found in Antarctica in 1984 and claimed to contain evidence of fossilized microbial life from Mars.

The ALH 84001 Meteorite and Claims of Life

The article begins by discussing the initial investigations of ALH 84001, noting that it contained amino acids similar to other meteorites like Murchison, Orgueil, and Tagish Lake. The author suggests that the media frenzy surrounding the ALH 84001 find, which was "far T00 MUCH impact," led to it being "buried." The initial critical reviews of ALH 84001 strangely ignored the possibility of actual living bugs, which the author speculates might have been a deliberate choice to avoid public panic.

The text explains that the idea of diseases from space is often downplayed, but the ALH 84001 announcement brought the concept of space bugs back into focus. The meteorite was found in the Allen Hills region of Antarctica, a prime location for Martian meteorite recovery due to the contrast of black rocks against ice and snow. ALH 84001 was classified as a Martian meteorite, belonging to a fourth sub-group of SNC (Shergotty, El Nakhla, Chassigny) meteorites. These meteorites are igneous rocks that solidified from magma, with different groups representing crystallization at various depths below the Martian surface.

Scientific Basis for Martian Origin

The article details the scientific reasoning for classifying these meteorites as Martian. Ordinary meteorites originate from the asteroid belt, with crystallization ages around 4.6 billion years. In contrast, SNC meteorites have crystallization ages between 150 million and 1.3 billion years, indicating they came from a body that supported molten rock much more recently. Venus and Earth are ruled out due to their atmospheres and geological activity. The Moon is also excluded based on its chemistry. The key evidence for a Martian origin came from NASA's Viking probes in 1976, which analyzed the Martian atmosphere. When small glass bubbles containing gas were found in another SNC meteorite, EETA 79001, the composition of the trapped gas was identical to the Martian atmosphere analysis, providing a 'smoking gun' for their Martian origin.

ALH 84001 itself was initially thought to be a diogenite from the asteroid belt. However, oxygen isotopic analysis revealed similarities to other SNC meteorites, confirming its Martian origin. Its age was found to be around 4.5 billion years, shortly after Mars formed, with shock-induced fractures dating to the late heavy bombardment period. The meteorite also contained organic compounds and distinctive carbon isotopic composition, suggesting formation from fluids in contact with the Martian atmosphere.

Evidence of Microbial Life

Further analysis of ALH 84001 revealed minute iron oxide (magnetite) grains and iron sulphides within carbonate globules. These magnetite crystals, measuring about 50 nanometers, were similar to those found in terrestrial bacteria used for orientation. Their shape (cuboid and teardrop) was unusual for meteorites. The association of these minerals with dissolution hollows in the carbonate grains suggested biogenic processes. High-resolution scanning electron microscopy revealed elongated and ovoid structures within the carbonate globules, compared to nanobacteria found on Earth. A striking photograph of a segmented wormlike object on mineral grains became the iconic image of the "Martian fossil."

Scientific Criticisms and Counterarguments

Critics raised several points against the biological interpretation. William Schopf, a microfossil expert, noted that the magnetite grains occurred as discrete entities rather than connected chains, were much smaller than terrestrial microfossils, and lacked voids indicative of fluid association. He also suggested that polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) could be due to secondary diagenesis (heating during burial) rather than biological products.

A major criticism was that Mars lacks a significant magnetic field, making magnetite crystals for orientation unnecessary for Martian bacteria. However, the article counters that Mars once had a strong magnetic field, which ceased due to its smaller size and faster cooling core. This early magnetic field and magnetosphere were crucial for protecting life and the atmosphere. Recent data from the Mars Global Surveyor has detected magnetic anomalies on Mars, supporting the idea of an early magnetic field.

Another criticism focused on the high temperatures at which the carbonate globules might have formed, suggesting they were too hot for life. The article argues that the locked-in magnetism of ALH 84001 indicates it was not heated above 110 degrees Celsius after solidification, a temperature survivable by hyperthermophiles. Furthermore, the alignment of magnetite crystals with carbonate crystals suggests 'epitaxial growth' or 'epitaxial settling,' processes that could occur even after cell death, but Imre Friedmann defended the biological origins of the magnetite crystals.

The Political Dimension

The article highlights the significant political strand behind the ALH 84001 discovery. The 12-year delay between discovery and announcement is described as a major point of controversy, fueling conspiracy theories. While NASA did store the meteorite, the delay was also attributed to the need to manage the announcement and prevent premature leaks. The author states he knew about the fossil two years before the public announcement, indicating a secret within the astronomical community.

The reasons for the eventual announcement are presented as complex. One factor was an indiscretion involving a US politician who revealed the secret to a prostitute, threatening to break the news. This, combined with hints in the astronomical press and rumors of scientists revealing the discovery, forced NASA's hand. The timing of the announcement, in August 1996, was strategically chosen to coincide with the 20th anniversary of the Viking missions to Mars, providing a "golden opportunity" to announce the "monumental discovery" and secure future funding for Mars exploration. The author notes that "Everyone was a winner thanks to the overtime put in by the political spin doctors!"

Size of Microbes and Future Implications

The final area of controversy discussed is the size of the potential fossil. Critics argued that the fossil was too small (20-100 nanometers) to be alive, as the minimum size for a cell containing DNA and reproduction was thought to be 200-300 nanometers. However, research has shown that microbes can be much smaller, with some as small as 50 nanometers found in various environments, including sandstone deep below the sea floor, exhibiting DNA and cell-like structures. This raised a new concern: if microbes are so small, they might require a 'host' to survive, leading to worries about 'symbiotic' life forms and potential public panic if released on Earth, a concern even shared by the CIA.

The article concludes by mentioning ongoing debates about life on Mars, including the discovery of green areas and methane. It suggests that while rumors of an imminent announcement of life are likely exaggerated, there is still a long way to go before definitively stating "Yes there is definitely life on Mars."

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes include the scientific investigation of extraterrestrial life, the challenges of interpreting evidence from meteorites, the role of scientific skepticism, and the significant influence of political considerations and media management on scientific announcements. The author's stance appears to be one of critical examination, highlighting how scientific findings can be shaped by external pressures and public perception, while also acknowledging the ongoing quest for evidence of life beyond Earth. The tone is analytical and somewhat skeptical of official narratives, particularly regarding the political spin involved.

Title: UFO ROUNDUP
Issue: VOL. 19 NO. 1
Date: JANUARY 2013
Publisher: MUFON
Country: USA
Price: $5.00

This issue of UFO ROUNDUP features a blend of the sensational and the deeply historical, with a satirical cover story about a "Chupacabra" encounter and a detailed exploration into the origins of Einstein's Theory of Relativity.

Linda Mouldy Bread Shoots Dead Another Wicked Chupacabra

The cover story, presented with a humorous image of a giraffe, details the exploits of "Intrepid beastie hunter, sex goddess and serious reporter Linda Mouldy Old Bread." She recounts how she was called to Houston, Texas, by a farmer named Jed, whose sheep were being bothered by a strange animal. Linda describes the creature as "looking like some varmint outa Mary Poppins. Vicious teeth 'n all." After a night stakeout, Linda confronts the animal, which she identifies as a Chupacabra. The encounter is depicted with darkly comedic elements, including the creature speaking and Linda's elaborate attire. After shooting the creature multiple times, it is taken to the "Cutemnsliceem laboratory in Austin" for an autopsy, where it is revealed to be surprisingly resilient and even helpful during the procedure, leading to the conclusion that it may not have been killed.

The article is explicitly noted as being "satirical and in good fun," with the editor and publisher expressing high regard for the work of "Miss Howe" (presumably the author of the satirical piece) and stating no genuine malice is intended.

The Mysterious Origins of Einstein's Theory of Relativity

This extensive article, spanning multiple pages, delves into the historical context and potential influences behind Albert Einstein's groundbreaking theories. It questions the conventional narrative of modern physics starting with Einstein in 1905 and Planck in 1900, suggesting that earlier thinkers laid crucial groundwork.

Mysterious Hungarians and Early Theories

The article highlights a group of Hungarians/Croatians who seemed to possess knowledge of Einstein's theories before him. It introduces Mileva Maric, Einstein's first wife, as a brilliant mathematician who met Einstein at the Swiss Federal Polytechnic. Evidence is presented suggesting Mileva may have been more than a collaborator, with claims that the original versions of Einstein's key articles were signed "Einstein - Marity" (a variation of her name).

Roger Boscovich, an 18th-century Croatian priest and scientist, is presented as a precursor to modern physics. His book, "A Theory of Natural Philosophy," is cited for containing "curious – almost uncanny - intimations of general relativity and quantum physics," even though the terms themselves were not coined until the 20th century.

The Fermi Paradox and Alien Civilizations

Enrico Fermi, a key figure in the Manhattan Project, is mentioned in relation to the "Fermi Paradox" – the question of why, if alien civilizations exist, they have not been detected. Leo Szilard, a Hungarian physicist, is quoted as suggesting, "They are among us, but they call themselves Hungarians," linking this idea to the cluster of brilliant scientists from the Hungarian/Croatian region.

Mileva Maric's Contribution and Secrecy

The article extensively discusses the controversy surrounding Mileva Maric's role. It notes her early mathematical prowess and her collaboration with Einstein. Despite Einstein referring to their work as "our work" and calling her his "right hand," her contribution has often been relegated to a footnote. The article speculates that the existence of an illegitimate daughter, given away for adoption, might have been a factor in covering up Mileva's significant role to protect Einstein's reputation.

Lack of References and Scientific Attribution

A significant point raised is the lack of references in Einstein's seminal 1905 paper, "On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies." This is contrasted with typical scientific papers and is speculated to be influenced by his time working at the patent office, where citing others could imply prior art. The possibility that Mileva's co-authorship and her sources were deliberately omitted is also explored.

Precursors to Relativity

The article traces the history of ideas related to gravity bending light rays, predating Einstein's General Relativity. Johann Georg von Soldner is mentioned for his 1801 calculation on the deflection of light by the sun, a concept later explored by Einstein. The influence of mathematicians like Riemann and Minkowski on Einstein's work is also noted, suggesting that Einstein built upon existing mathematical frameworks.

Nikola Tesla and Alien Signals

Nikola Tesla, a renowned inventor, is introduced as a figure central to UFO conspiracy theories. The article mentions his claim of detecting alien signals and his belief that the relativity theory was significantly older than commonly believed, attributing it to Boscovich.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine presents a dual focus: one of sensational, albeit satirical, paranormal encounters and another of rigorous historical and scientific inquiry. The editorial stance, particularly regarding the satirical piece, is clearly one of lightheartedness and respect for the author's creativity. The more serious articles aim to challenge conventional historical narratives in science, particularly concerning the attribution of scientific discoveries and the often-overlooked contributions of individuals like Mileva Maric. The recurring theme is the exploration of mysteries, whether they be extraterrestrial phenomena or the hidden histories of scientific breakthroughs.

This issue of SUFOG mag., volume 8, issue 137/138, dated March/April 2002, features a cover story titled "Grandma's on the telly" which discusses a mysterious television broadcast interruption. The magazine delves into historical aspects of physics, particularly the contributions of Roger Boscovich and his connection to modern theories, alongside the development of the atom bomb and the role of scientists like Einstein and Szilard.

The Atom Bomb and Einstein's Involvement

The issue begins by detailing Leo Szilard's conversation with Albert Einstein about chain reactions in uranium and graphite. Einstein, initially unaware of the possibility, quickly grasped the implications and was willing to take responsibility for sounding the alarm. Szilard's understanding of relativity is noted as potentially exceeding Einstein's, as he was aware of A-bomb applications first. Einstein was interested in assisting with the Atom Bomb project, offering advice on the gaseous diffusion method for separating U-235. However, Vannevar Bush, director of the Office of Scientific Research and Development, deemed Einstein a 'security risk' and withheld further information. Consequently, Einstein had no further connection with the project after a second letter to the president.

Szilard, despite also being considered a 'security risk,' became a key scientist in the US project to build the Atom Bomb. He was part of a Hungarian group of scientists who had fled the Nazis and were instrumental in motivating the creation of the A-bomb. The text notes that the term 'alien' in this context likely referred to them being foreigners rather than extraterrestrials.

The Two Versions of Newtonian Theory and Boscovich's Legacy

The magazine explores the idea that certain Hungarian physicists understood Einstein's theory better than Einstein himself, attributing this to two versions of Newtonian theory. The Hungarian version, taught differently, unified quantum and relativity ideas, a concept lost to Western science. The issue highlights the historical neglect of Roger Boscovich (a.k.a. Ruder Boskovic), an 18th-century physicist whose work is credited with laying the foundations for modern physics, including quantum and relativistic ideas. His theories, which reconciled Newton's physics with the concept of absolute stillness of the Earth, are presented as a precursor to Einstein's relativity. The text suggests that modern physics has failed to unify these ideas, leading to two dis-unified theories in the 20th century.

The article discusses the conflict between the idea of a stationary Earth and a moving Earth, and how the Church's ban on the Copernican doctrine led to the concepts of 'absolute' and 'relative' motion. Galileo's attempts to prove the Earth's motion by the tides are mentioned, as is Newton's work on gravity and the Heliocentric Theory. The role of the Jesuits, particularly Roger Boscovich, in challenging the interdiction against Copernicanism is detailed, leading to its repeal in 1757.

Edward Teller is quoted stating that science is full of mistakes and that 'exact science' is a misnomer. The author posits that the 'mess' in physics stems from forgetting the historical developments between Newton and Einstein, which led physicists to overlook the Unified Theory they should be working from.

Grandma's on the Telly: The Gramaha Broadcast

The cover story recounts an incident from November 16, 1977, when a local news bulletin on Southern ITV in England was interrupted by an authoritative voice identifying himself as 'Gramaha, the representative of the Asta Galactic Command.' For five-and-a-half minutes, Gramaha warned mankind against the use of nuclear energy, stating, "You have but a short time to live together in peace and goodwill." The broadcast was highly organized and sophisticated, originating from an unknown power source. Authorities dismissed it as a hoax, but the perpetrators were never found. The message from Gramaha spoke of an impending 'great awakening' and the Age of Aquarius, urging humanity to avoid destructive forces and embrace peace and spiritual evolution. It also mentioned that scientists have long ignored their warnings and that atomic bombs pose an existential threat.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue emphasizes the importance of historical context in understanding scientific progress, particularly in physics. It highlights the neglect of significant contributions, such as those of Roger Boscovich, and suggests that modern physics has fragmented a once-unified theoretical framework. The magazine also touches upon the historical interplay between science, religion, and government secrecy, as seen in the context of the atom bomb development. The inclusion of the Gramaha broadcast introduces a theme of extraterrestrial communication and warnings about humanity's destructive tendencies, aligning with a broader interest in unexplained phenomena and alternative perspectives on science and existence. The editorial stance appears to be one that questions mainstream scientific narratives and seeks to uncover forgotten or suppressed knowledge, advocating for a more holistic and unified understanding of the universe.

This issue of 'ET Reality' features a scientist's critical perspective on UFO phenomena and a detailed interview with ufologist Max Burns. The magazine's tone is critical and skeptical, particularly towards claims of alien abductions and the individuals who promote them.

Alien Abductions: A Skeptical View

The first section, attributed to a contributor named 'Joker' from The Skeptical UFO Site, dismisses alien abduction claims. The author questions the commonality of abductees living on farms and the lack of abductions of prominent figures. He argues that the inconsistent narratives of abductees and the unexplained presence of drained cattle bodies suggest these stories are not credible. The primary explanation offered for abduction experiences is sleep paralysis, a condition where individuals experience hallucinations and a loss of motor function while sleeping, which can be mistaken for an out-of-body experience or an alien encounter. The author strongly advises those claiming to be abductees to seek medical and psychological help.

A Cuddly Bunny and Three Very Grumpy Men: Interview with Max Burns

The main body of the magazine is an interview with Max Burns, conducted by an unnamed interviewer (SM). The interview is noted as being contentious, with several redrafts and sensitive issues discussed. Burns is presented as being in a long-standing dispute with researchers Dave Clarke and Andy Roberts.

Max Burns' Background and Entry into Ufology

Max Burns, who is 42 years old, clarifies that a previous image of him was a mock-up. He became interested in ufology around 1986/1987, initially sparked by the Rendlesham case. His childhood interest in extraterrestrial life evolved into a more active involvement through attending conferences and exploring the internet, which he first accessed in 1988.

The Sheffield Incident (1997)

Burns recounts his investigation into the Sheffield incident on March 24, 1997. He was drawn into the case when a friend's wife, who had recently experienced personal tragedy, reported seeing low-flying jets and a triangle-shaped UFO over her house in Rotherham. Burns went to the scene and observed military activity, including a Sea King helicopter and military vehicles. He notes that initial reports mentioned sonic booms and explosions, and that military bases denied any air activity that night.

Controversy and Allegations

Burns details the controversy surrounding his investigation, particularly his conflict with Dave Clarke and Andy Roberts. He alleges that Clarke has tried to discredit his work, even obtaining personal financial information about him. Burns also points to contradictions between Clarke's reports and interviews given by other individuals involved in the incident, such as Mike France, the head of search and rescue.

A key element of the controversy involves Jonathan Dagenhart, an RAF engineer who provided audio testimony to Burns about a plane going down. Dagenhart later retracted his statement, claiming he was pressured and that his words were twisted. Burns questions why Dagenhart would retract his statement and then speak to David Clarke if nothing had happened.

Burns suggests that the intense animosity between him, Clarke, and Roberts might stem from Clarke and Roberts working for intelligence services, aiming to suppress his findings. He emphasizes that his research is ongoing and that he aims to establish that a plane did go down, which would then open the door for a larger investigation.

Burns' Professional Experience

Burns explains his professional background, which includes extensive experience in marketing and promotions for leisure companies. He describes his role as developing and executing marketing strategies, opening new venues, and managing promotional teams. He clarifies that he is not university educated but considers himself knowledgeable.

The Aviation Fuel Connection

Burns highlights the presence of a man covered in aviation fuel near the incident site. He investigated this by checking with local filling stations, who confirmed little demand for aviation fuel. He questions the narrative that this man, possibly an attempted suicide, would obtain aviation fuel and pour it over himself.

Theories and Counter-Theories

Burns proposes three possible explanations for the presence of jets and the UFO: escort, war games, or the jets chasing the UFO. He dismisses the idea that they were unrelated. He also discusses the police response, suggesting they were 'fobbed off' and quickly called off the search despite evidence of unusual activity, including multiple sightings of flying triangles and glowing orange objects.

The Dispute with Clarke and Roberts

Burns elaborates on the bitterness of the dispute, suggesting it may be due to Clarke and Roberts' immediate attempts to debunk his findings. He questions how Clarke obtained specific information about his activities and financial matters. He also notes that Clarke wrote a lengthy report for BUFORA claiming nothing happened, despite Burns' investigation being in its early stages.

Burns recounts an instance where he was prevented from speaking at BUFORA, with Clarke alleging he used Dagenhart's testimony without permission, despite Dagenhart having given full authorization. Burns argues that Dagenhart's information was already public knowledge.

He concludes by stating that the conflict is ongoing and that he has witnesses to support his claims. He believes the situation is driven by a desire to stop him from speaking and that the dispute is akin to children squabbling.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine adopts a highly skeptical and critical stance towards conventional UFO narratives, particularly alien abductions, which are attributed to psychological phenomena like sleep paralysis. The editorial focus appears to be on debunking sensational claims and scrutinizing the methods and motives of ufologists. The interview with Max Burns, while presenting his investigative efforts, is framed within a context of inter-researcher disputes and alleged cover-ups, suggesting a critical examination of the ufology community itself. The overall tone is one of questioning and challenging widely held beliefs within the UFO field.

This document consists of pages 81-89 from an issue of 'UFO Matrix', featuring an extensive interview with Max Burns, conducted by 'SM' (Stuart). The interview focuses heavily on Burns's experiences within the ufology community, his research into UFO cases, and his conflicts with other prominent figures in the field, particularly David Clarke and Andy Roberts.

Max Burns's Account of Conflicts and Persecution

The interview begins with Burns recounting an incident where David Clarke allegedly became berserk and abusive during a visit to Sheffield, leading to Burns's arrest over council tax arrears. Burns asserts that this was a deliberate attempt by Clarke to interfere with his life and research, suggesting Clarke might be working for the government as a stringer. He criticizes Clarke and Roberts for affecting the 'future history and mythology of the subject' and calls them 'hoaxers' and 'proven liars'.

Burns details how he was arrested after providing Clarke with a police log. He claims the arrest was for council tax arrears, which he attributes to losing his employment due to the 'shit that had happened'. He refutes any suggestion of being a drug dealer, stating that over a ten-year period from 1997, he could have earned over half a million pounds legally in the leisure business.

He expresses disdain for individuals like Joe McGonagle, whom he describes as 'sycophantic' and seeking to join Roberts' and Clarke's circle. Burns believes these individuals are spreading 'unproven crap' and are 'massaging' Roberts. He also mentions that Clarke has allegedly helped Roberts with an article, expressing discomfort with receiving help from someone he considers a 'proven planter of false information'.

The Blue Hare Hoax and Discreditation Attempts

Burns elaborates on the 'Blue Hare' hoax, which he believes was designed to plant false information into his research. He explains that Malcolm Robinson booked him for a lecture in January, and shortly before, he received emails from the 'Blue Hare' group. He suspects this was an enticement to speak about it, with Tim Mathews present to record the lecture, presumably to later claim Burns had used fake information in his research.

He states that the purpose of this setup was to allow Roberts and Clarke to publicly discredit him as a 'poor investigator' by pointing out his inclusion of fake information. Burns acknowledges that in rigorous research, one must follow leads, even if they suspect a hoax, as it might be the 'real deal'. He describes the day of the lecture as a planned outing to the Peak District, anticipating that Roberts and Clarke might try to interfere.

Legal Troubles and Personal Impact

Burns discusses the significant impact of his conviction and imprisonment. He states he had no prior cautions or convictions, except for a minor incident at age 13. He describes the trial as being based on 'lies' and recalls his barrister mouthing 'I'm sorry' after the guilty verdict. He hints at further details about the trial that will form the basis of his appeal but asks for them not to be printed at this time.

He reiterates his belief that he was set up and that 'something very untoward has occurred'. He denies Roberts's claims that he admitted to drug dealing or taking pills, stating Roberts started these rumors. Burns served 15 months in prison.

Upon release, Burns found himself with only £120 and had to rebuild his life. He took on agency work, including at Sainsbury's, and later trained in diamond drilling, sample taking, and geology. He has worked on various projects, including at BAE Warton and on military bases, performing non-destructive testing. He describes this period as tough, having to rebuild his life from scratch.

Despite the ordeal, Burns expresses a lack of bitterness, viewing the 15 months as a small portion of his life. However, he acknowledges that the experience ended his career, which had included awards and a high income. He is determined to get his conviction overturned and dismisses Roberts's public statements as irrelevant until the legal process concludes.

Ufology Community Dynamics and Future Research

Burns criticizes individuals who comment on his research without contacting him directly, calling their opinions 'worthless and unobjective'. He mentions an upcoming article for 'Notes From The Borderland' which will recap events since the publication of 'The Usual Suspects'. He expresses frustration with people like Joe McGonagle who apologize for Roberts while treating him 'like the anti-Christ' without knowing him.

He describes his experience with Clarke and Roberts as negative, calling them 'wrong ‘uns' and suggesting their behavior is even more despicable if they are not working for the government. He highlights the difference between himself and Clarke, stating he would not have had David Clarke arrested over council tax, viewing it as 'one step too far'.

Burns confirms he has evidence of Clarke admitting to reporting him for council tax, via a fax to Rotherham Council. He questions why Clarke would hate him so much, suggesting it's a tactic to distract him from his investigations by interfering with his life. He contrasts his own approach with Clarke's, a PhD in Mythology and Folklore, questioning how Clarke's faculty would view his alleged involvement in hoaxing and publishing timelines.

Burns believes that his interest in ufology is a hobby, and he seeks the truth. He criticizes Roberts for wanting to 'bring conflict and confusion' and 'pollute the research field' by masquerading as a genuine researcher. He dismisses the idea that crop circles are hoaxes, viewing them as man-made art.

He mentions that his enthusiasm for the subject remains, despite his experiences. He is involved in the BUFORA archiving project, dedicating weekends to it. He describes the archive as a 'treasure' and sees his involvement as 'doing something positive in ufology', contrasting it with the perceived detrimental actions of Clarke and Roberts.

Burns also addresses Roberts's recent claims of informing local police about his whereabouts due to fear, calling it paranoid and an attempt to 'wind him up'. He states he has shown Roberts to be a 'scumbag' through the publication of 'The Usual Suspects'.

Supporting Links and Further Information

The document concludes with links to various articles and resources related to Max Burns, the Sheffield Incident, the Blue Hare Hoax, and David Clarke's version of events. It also provides contact information for Max Burns.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the personal conflicts and alleged conspiracies within the ufology community, the challenges of UFO investigation, the impact of legal troubles on researchers, and the debate between genuine investigation and alleged hoaxing or discreditation tactics. The editorial stance appears to be one of presenting Max Burns's detailed account of his experiences and his perspective on the events and individuals involved, allowing readers to form their own conclusions.