UFO Register - Vol 10 parts 1-2 1979

Magazine Overview

Title: THE UFO REGISTER
Issue: Volume 10, Parts 1 and 2
Date: December 1979
Publisher: Data Research
Country: United Kingdom
Type: Bi-annual journal for recording and disseminating factual information relating to the UFO phenomenon.

Editorial

The editorial apologizes for the significant delay in the publication of this volume, attributing it to unpredictable personal time demands and economic problems in Britain. The editor expresses hope that the current volume makes amends for the delay and reassures readers that Data Research is still active. Future articles for Volume Eleven are mentioned, including further research on UFO-Wave Migration, previously unpublished UFO reports from Greece, and analyses of specific years of UFO events. The editor aims to allay fears that the publication or research has ceased.

Articles

"The Occupants of Crashed 'Saucers'"

This article, by Dr. J. Hurtak, is based on a talk given to the Borderland Sciences Research Association. It reproduces information regarding the physical bodies of occupants from alleged crashed UFOs retrieved in New Mexico, Arizona, and Mexico in the late 1940s and early 1950s. A specific event in 1946 involving a crashed vehicle near Great Falls, Montana, is mentioned, with bodies being transported to Edwards Air Force Base in California. The green hue on the bodies was attributed to the fuel system's chemistry. The subject matter is described as being beyond Top Secret classification. President Eisenhower reportedly asked Winston Churchill if the existence of extraterrestrial bodies held in military captivity should be made public, but Churchill felt the Western world was not prepared. The article then details the physical characteristics of these specimens, noting their approximate height of 3.5 to 4 feet, large heads, sunken or deeply set eyes, vague noses, and mouths described as small slits or non-functional. Most observers described them as hairless, though some had slight hair patches or a silver skullcap. The beings reportedly had no breathing attachments or communication devices, suggesting telepathy. Some had an opening in the right frontal lobe area, indicating a potential third brain. Their arms were long and thin, reaching to the knee, with four-fingered hands lacking thumbs. The skin was generally described as grey, with variations to beige, tan, or pinkish-grey. Reproductive organs were reportedly absent, suggesting a possible cloning method of reproduction. The fluid within their bodies is compared to a substance mentioned in ancient Greek texts. The article anticipates future chromosome analysis and collective statements from scientists revealing different racial types of intelligence that have visited Earth.

Comments by Riley Crabb: Riley Crabb, who was in the Army Air Force in 1946, confirms that the information aligns with what was apparent during the Maury Island encounter of 1947. He notes that Army Air Force intelligence already had evidence of Flying Saucers from the Great Falls crash. He recounts an interaction with Lt. Frank Brown of Military Intelligence regarding Maury Island fragments, suggesting a 'cover-up' and 'Silence Policy' were already in place.

"Further Contributions to a Knowledge of French Humanoid Cases"

Authored by Alain Gamard, this article presents additional information on French humanoid cases. It notes that while many instances have been documented, some celebrated French cases are not well-detailed in popular literature. The author has conducted special research to bring to light information on specific French cases involving sightings of humanoids. The article lists these cases chronologically, providing dates, times, locations, witnesses, and references to their sources, which include provincial newspapers and specialized UFO publications. Notable cases include sightings in Beausoleil (1951), Le Fauga (1952), various locations in 1954 (e.g., Watten, Olmont, Quarouble, Feurs, Joinville-le-Pont, Toulouse, Soissons, Livry-sur-Seine, Dommartin, Villeneuve-sur-Lot, Saint-Perdoux, Cozes, Mendionde, Marville-Moutier Brulé, Monteaux, Vernosc-en-Annonay, Brienne, Domart & Condé-Folie, Louvigne du Désert, Saint-Pardoux-le-Neuf, Ygrande, Andigne/St. Martin-du-Bois, Lewarde, Saint-Maudan), one in 1958 (Miramas), two in uncertain localities in 1958, Le Drennec (1960), Saint-Omer (1960s), near Valensole (1965), Roanne (1967), Wissous (1967), Château de Martins (1969), Le Puy de Chanturge (1969), Laujuzan (1974), Saint-Julien-la-Brousse (1975), between Herstroff and Hobling (1976), and Meylan (1976). The author concludes that the 1954 French UFO wave was likely more extensive than previously understood and encourages further detailed research into French press sources. Readers with knowledge of unlisted French humanoid cases are invited to contact the author.

"Unusual Aerial Phenomena Over Burbage Common (Leics.) In 1978"

This article by Graham Hall summarizes events monitored during the Winter, Spring, and Summer months of 1978 in the Burbage Common area of Leicestershire, attributed to inexplicable aerial activity, possibly UFOs. The cases were monitored by locally based investigators. The article presents the cases chronologically, including excerpts from witness statements. Some eyewitnesses requested anonymity, designated by capital letters. The article details 15 cases observed on the evening of January 24th, 1978, in Leicester and surrounding areas. These include sightings of triangular objects with blue and red lights, red cylindrical objects, orange oval objects, silver discs emitting vapour trails, white pulsating lights, delta-shaped white objects, grouped red, white, and yellow lights, and stationary triangles with coloured lights. Other sightings included large triangular objects with coloured lights, red lights, orange lights, and formations of red, green, and white lights. Stationary orange ovals and 'saucer'-shaped objects with red and green lights were also reported, as was a ring of many coloured lights. All reports were received by telephone within 24 hours of the sightings. The objects were generally described as moving at an altitude lower than normal aircraft. The area is noted as being under a main flight path for aircraft.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around detailed case studies of UFO sightings and alleged encounters with extraterrestrial beings. The publication emphasizes factual information and data collection, as evidenced by the 'Data Research' affiliation. The editorial stance appears to be one of serious investigation into the UFO phenomenon, with a commitment to publishing detailed reports and analyses, despite publication delays. There is a clear focus on historical cases, particularly those involving humanoids and alleged crashed UFOs, as well as contemporary sightings. The publication aims to be a comprehensive resource for ufologists and researchers.

This issue of NUFON News, identified as issue number 15, focuses on a series of UFO sightings that occurred primarily on the evening of January 24th, 1978, in the Leicestershire region of the United Kingdom. The magazine presents detailed eyewitness accounts and includes a map illustrating witness locations and approximate flight paths. The overall tone suggests a serious investigation into unexplained aerial phenomena.

Key Articles and Reports

Case One: Lockett and Simmons Sightings

Steven Lockett (14) and Andrew Simmons (14) reported seeing an object on January 24th, 1978, at 7:30 p.m. on Forest Road, Hinckley. Initially described as a bright orange light, it moved towards Leicester, hovered, and then appeared to bounce back, showing a blue/green light before returning to orange. It then moved over the John Cleveland College and disappeared towards Stoke Golding in a north-westerly direction. Both witnesses were interviewed on February 6th, 1978. Their statements are accompanied by drawings (Figures 1 and 2).

Case Two: John Barnes Sighting

John Barnes, aged 33, of Sapcote, reported seeing what he believed to be the same object as in Case One at 7:30 p.m. on the same date. He watched the light for approximately 30 minutes as he drove towards Barwell, describing its brightness as comparable to the planet Venus. His statement, provided by Mr. Barnes, details the object appearing as a bright orange light, moving towards Leicester, returning, and showing both blue and orange lights. He observed it until he went indoors in Barwell.

Case Three: Miss 'A' Sighting

At 7:30 p.m. on January 24th, 1978, a 51-year-old head teacher, identified as Miss 'A', observed an unusual aerial phenomenon from her kitchen window in Huncote, looking towards Hinckley. She initially saw a bright red light over the M69 motorway, which appeared stationary. It later seemed to be circling or moving for a few hundred yards. Using binoculars, she observed a hazy black shape with steady yellow and blue-green lights. She noted the absence of aircraft noise and that the object was not very high.

Case Four: Mr. 'B' Sighting

Mr. 'B', aged 53, of Forest Road, Huncote, was contacted by Miss 'A' and observed the object at 7:35 p.m. He described it as an aircraft flying slowly in a wide anti-clockwise circle over the M69 motorway. A bright red light was visible with a white light, and as the object turned, a green-blue light appeared. He was puzzled by the constant visibility of the red light, which he felt was unlikely for a normal navigation light.

Case Five: Car Occupants' Sighting

Three occupants of a car travelling along Leicester Road, Hinckley, at approximately 7:55 p.m. on January 24th, 1978—Mrs Eveline Packer (43), Mrs Nancy Smith (46), and Mrs 'C' (31)—reported seeing an unusual aerial object. Mrs Packer saw a bright white light moving fast, then a bright red glowing light that followed their car. Mrs Smith described a bright light that moved very fast, then a red light that seemed to be a pylon light but moved with the car. Miss 'C' noted the object's round-about course, speed, and up-and-down movement, concluding it was not a plane. She described a red light on the left and another on the right, and at one point, the object appeared so close she could distinguish its shape, resembling pictures of flying saucers with a glowing perimeter. The object stopped when the car stopped.

Case Six: Linda Collinson and Barry Parsons Sighting

At 7:35 p.m. on January 24th, 1978, Miss Linda Collinson (15) and her boyfriend Barry Parsons observed an object over Brookside, Burbage. It approached from the north-west, stopped, and changed color from bright white to bright red, then to a very bright bluish-green. Two additional lights (white and red) appeared, forming a triangular shape. The object remained stationary for three minutes before moving slowly north-west and vanishing. The total duration was estimated at five minutes, with no sound heard.

Case Seven: Jane Meigh Sighting

Jane Meigh, aged 20, of Brookside, Burbage, sighted an aerial phenomenon at 7:55 p.m. on January 24th, 1978. She saw a fairly large red light moving fast across the sky, disappearing behind houses and reappearing, making several trips. The object was entirely red and very low in the sky.

Case Eight: John Kirkland Sighting

Mr John Kirkland, aged 37, of Earl Shilton, witnessed an aerial apparition at 8:05 p.m. on January 24th, 1978, while driving between Barwell and Earl Shilton. He saw a mass of red lights forming a circle, stationary at approximately 35° above the horizon. After three minutes, the lights began to move slowly west and disappeared over rooftops. The sighting lasted five minutes, with no sound heard.

Case Nine: Mrs. 'D' Sightings

Mrs. 'D', a secretary from Barwell, reported two sightings on the evening of January 24th, 1978. At approximately 7:50 p.m., while driving home, she noticed two bright lights (red front, blue-green rear) attached to an object travelling north-west to south-east. Later, upon arriving home, she saw two red lights stationary in the east. Using binoculars, she observed a dark triangle with two red lights at the leading edge. The object circled Earl Shilton before moving north-west. This second sighting lasted approximately seven minutes with no sound detected.

Case Ten: John Francis Dagley Sighting

On Sunday, April 23rd, 1978, at 9:10 p.m., Mr John Francis Dagley of Burbage witnessed an unusual object. He saw several lights rotating around an enormous triangular-shaped object of grey-silver color, with a cylinder-shaped structure at the rear. The lights were white, red, and blue-green, while the cylinder glowed with a reddish hue. The object passed directly above his house, and he watched it for three minutes before it was lost from view. No sound was heard.

Case Eleven: Mr. 'E' Sighting and Investigation

On August 26th, 1978, Mr. 'E', a school-teacher from Hinckley, contacted H.A.P.I. investigators after witnessing what he believed to be a UFO. An investigator visited his address but found no trace of the witness or the object. It was later discovered that less than an hour prior, Mr and Mrs 'F' had seen a "bright oval reflection" hovering over the John Cleaveland College. Mrs 'F' described it as similar to a car headlight. The object was seen by multiple witnesses, including three young girls (Beverly Lenton, Elizabeth O'Neill, and Marie Malin) who described it as a "stationary silver sphere" that fell towards the ground. Investigations included a search of the area, which yielded no evidence. The object's color changed from pale yellow to deep orange to silvery-white, suggesting a cooling process. Explanations like balloons or ball-lightning were ruled out due to weather conditions and the object's size and duration.

Case Twelve: Mr and Mrs Jackson Sighting

On August 30th, 1978, Mr and Mrs Jackson reported seeing two large grey metallic objects near the M69 motorway junction with Sapcote Road.

Meteorological Conditions

On the evening of January 24th, 1978, the meteorological conditions over the Hinckley-Burbage-Barwell region were dry, windless, cold with frost, and the sky was clear with excellent visibility. The absence of wind was noted as significant given the silence reported by witnesses.

Conclusions

The report concludes that on January 24th, 1978, at least two aerial objects of unknown manufacture and origin conducted a low-altitude survey of areas in Leicestershire, focusing on the strip between Brookside Estate and the villages of Barwell and Earl Shilton. The consistent witness accounts and lack of conventional explanations lead to the classification of these objects as unidentified.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the consistent reporting of unusual aerial phenomena, often described as lights or objects with non-conventional flight characteristics, across multiple witnesses on the same night. The silence of these objects is frequently noted. The editorial stance appears to be one of serious investigation and documentation of these events, presenting eyewitness testimony and attempting to find explanations, while ultimately concluding that many remain unidentified. The magazine emphasizes the reliability of witness accounts and the significance of consistent observations.

This issue of Flying Saucer Review, Volume 23, Issue 23, dated '19' (likely 1979 based on context), features two main articles: "SOME NOTES ON UFOCALS" by J.B. Delair and "THE GEOGRAPHICAL MIGRATION OF UFO WAVES: A 10-YEAR CYCLE?" by Ahmad Jamaludin. The magazine is published by Flying Saucer Review Publications in the United Kingdom and is priced at £1.00.

"SOME NOTES ON UFOCALS" by J.B. Delair

J.B. Delair's article introduces the term 'ufocal' to describe locations persistently visited by UFOs. He notes that while many ufocals have been identified globally, their true significance remains unexplained. Delair critiques the imprecise use of the term 'ufocal' and proposes a reappraisal and classification system. He identifies two main groups of ufocals: Group One, exhibiting a geographic bias, and Group Two, with a temporal bias. A third, intermediate group is also mentioned.

• Group One ufocals are further subdivided into four categories:
• Category 1: Localities of very limited extent receiving concentrated UFO attention for short periods, after which activity ceases. Examples include Brazey-en-Morven (France, 1968), Artigas (Uruguay, 1968), and Oakhampton (England, 1967).
• Category 2: Localities of very limited geographical extent receiving regular, but not concentrated, UFO visits for indefinite periods without marked cessation. Examples include Durban (South Africa, 1965 ff.) and Warminster (England, 1966 ff.).
• Category 3: Areas of wider geographical extent receiving concentrated UFO attention for short periods, after which activity becomes sporadic or ceases. Examples include Sweden (1945/6), The Potteries (England, 1967), and Exeter, Mass. (USA, 1965).
• Category 4: Areas of wider geographical extent receiving regular, but not concentrated, UFO visits for indefinite periods without marked cessation. Examples include the Tully and Mt. Mackay region (Australia, 1965 ff.) and the New Forest/Isle of Wight area (England, 1965 ff.).

• Group Two ufocals are subdivided into two categories:
• Category A: Localities visited by UFOs at the same times within a given twenty-four hour period on consecutive days for a limited period. Examples include Nab Wood, Shipley (England, 1967), Florianopolis (Brazil, 1968), and Melilla (Morocco, 1968).
• Category B: Localities visited by UFOs at the same hour within a given twenty-four hour period on non-consecutive (and often irregularly spaced) days for an indefinite period. An example is Russell, Kansas (USA, 1972).

Delair discusses the potential link between ufocals and theories like orthoteny or 'windows' for UFO movement, but emphasizes that no single explanation has been satisfactory. He suggests that the failure to distinguish between different categories of ufocals has hindered understanding. He also touches upon the idea that investigators might inadvertently generate 'flaps' or localized UFO activity, and considers the possibility that some ufocals might be social-psychological effects rather than genuine UFO phenomena.

"THE GEOGRAPHICAL MIGRATION OF UFO WAVES: A 10-YEAR CYCLE?" by Ahmad Jamaludin

Ahmad Jamaludin's paper investigates the geographical routes of UFO waves occurring between 1950 and 1979. The study plots hypothetical routes for known, unknown, and probable UFO waves, suggesting a cyclical migration pattern. The proposed cycle involves waves migrating northwards in the Western Hemisphere for 6 years, followed by a southward progression in the Eastern Hemisphere for 4 years, completing a 10-year cycle.

The article notes periodicities in UFO reports, both diurnal and weekly, but highlights a tendency for the phenomenon to 'bunch' into waves. While some researchers have linked this to psychological factors, Jamaludin's evidence suggests geographical migration. This evidence aligns with J.B. Delair's earlier work differentiating between major waves (TYPE A, approximately every 10 years) and lesser waves (TYPE B, every 4 or 6 years).

Jamaludin makes a basic assumption that no major waves occurred more than once per year. The plotting of wave locations faces challenges due to waves diffusing over wide areas or having multiple fronts. The study overcomes this by identifying a 'probable wave' location and assuming undocumented waves occurred between known epicenters.

The paper presents figures (1a, 1b, 1c, and 2) illustrating these migratory routes. For example, the English wave of 1967 is seen to be repeated in 1977, completing a 10-year cycle. The routes often involve an imaginary loop over the Northern Hemisphere before crossing into the Eastern Hemisphere. The paper also references the 1947 Kenneth Arnold sighting as a key event in the modern era of UFO reports, linked to a cross-over in the Northern Hemisphere.

An attempt to check the 10-year cycle for the historical period 1896-1945 was largely unsuccessful due to a low number of known waves, but the temporal positions seemed to conform to a projected 10-year cycle. The paper concludes by suggesting that further literature searches are needed to confirm these patterns and that the formulation of satisfactory explanations for ufocals might shed light on why UFOs visit Earth.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue of Flying Saucer Review focuses on analytical approaches to UFO phenomena, moving beyond simple sighting reports to explore underlying patterns and structures. The concept of 'ufocals' and the geographical migration of UFO waves are presented as key areas for further research. The editorial stance appears to be one of rigorous investigation, seeking to classify and understand UFO events through data analysis and systematic study, while acknowledging the complexities and persistent mysteries of the subject. The articles emphasize the importance of distinguishing between genuine phenomena and potential misidentifications or psychological effects.

This issue of "The UFO Register" (Volume Ten, Part Two, March 1980) is primarily dedicated to the ongoing work of Data Research in cataloguing and analyzing UFO phenomena, with a particular focus on photographic evidence and the concept of 'UFO waves'. The publication presents two significant supplements to its "Provisional Catalogue of UFO Photographs", detailing sightings and photographic records from historical periods.

Editorial and Data Research Updates

The editorial section provides an update on the activities of Data Research. Despite rumors to the contrary, the organization continues its in-depth investigations into UFO phenomena. The issue features two supplements to the main UFO photograph catalogue, which commenced in 1975. The editorial acknowledges the withdrawal of R. Twine from the investigative scene and the departure of John Howse due to business commitments. Susan Rees has joined the Data Research team, filling John Howse's place on the UK committee and within the team. She is joined by Marie Bird and Jeff Ambler, who are actively involved in analytical studies and report evaluations of UFO sightings. The editorial expresses gratitude to Robert Twine and John Howse for their past contributions and welcomes the new team members.

"A Provisional Catalogue of UFO Photographs: Supplement One (1883-1957)"

Authored by E. Cox and J.B. Delair, this supplement aims to record UFO photographs from the 1883-1970 period that were inadvertently omitted from earlier installments or have recently come to light. It also includes updated details for previously catalogued photographs. The system for cataloguing new entries involves using suffixes (e.g., 'a', 'b') to maintain chronological order. The authors express gratitude to various individuals who provided data, including Rudy De Groote, Lucius Farish, Alain Gamard, Richard Nugent, and Sally Woodhouse.

The supplement lists numerous additions to previous entries, providing dates, locations, brief descriptions, and references to other publications or sources. For instance, entry 0010 details an observation from 5.9.1946, referenced in the Daily Telegraph. Entry 0036 notes an observation on 27.4.1950, with references to Carrouges and Santos. Entry 0071 specifies an observation on 16.5.1953 in Bouffioulx, Belgium.

Previously uncatalogued entries are also presented, starting with 0001a for an event on April 10th, 1897, in Chicago, USA, described as a cigar-shaped object. Other uncatalogued entries include a large round luminous object in Fatima, Portugal (1917), a luminous disc in the Canaries, Spain (1950), two luminous globes in San Jose, California, USA (1952), several discoidal objects in Washington D.C., USA (1952), and an ellipsoidal object in Miami Beach, Florida, USA (1952).

"A Provisional Catalogue of UFO Photographs: Supplement Two (1958-1966)"

Also by E. Cox and J.B. Delair, this second supplement covers the years 1958 to 1966. It follows the same format as the first supplement. The authors note that photographs showing "squiggly lines and meandering light patterns" that are purported to be UFOs are omitted if they can be explained by mundane processes or known optical effects, unless a trustworthy method can be devised to separate genuine UFO light effects. The authors again thank contributors, including Lucius Farish, Alain Gamard, Raymon Sloper, and Sally Woodhouse.

This supplement also lists additions to previous entries and previously uncatalogued entries. For example, entry 0154a details a circular object observed on August 20th, 1958, in Udine, Italy. Entry 0164a describes an oval object at Diamond Head, Hawaii, USA, on June 18th, 1959. Entry 0170a notes an object in Dubuque, Iowa, USA, in March 1960, though the photograph was not seen. Entry 0188b describes an object shaped like a shallow hemisphere in Cordoba, Argentina, in January 1963. Entry 0205a details a torpedo-shaped object in Rio Vista, California, USA, in May 1964.

UFO Waves and Cyclic Phenomena

Table I presents data on "UFO Waves: knows, probables, and unknowns" from 1950 to 1979. The table lists years, known, probable, and unknown locales, direction of migration, and longitude. Notably, the first two sets of data cover eleven-year periods, not ten, suggesting a possible relationship to the eleven-year sunspot cycle. The article posits that these cyclic routes might be predictable, allowing for advance preparation for predicted UFO wave occurrences. The authors indicate that this aspect of UFO wave migration will be discussed further in a subsequent article.

References

The issue includes extensive lists of references, primarily books and articles related to UFO phenomena, citing authors such as J.A. Hynek, D.R. Saunders, J.B. Delair, G. Creighton, V.-J. Ballester Olmos, R.G. Neeley Jnr., Loren E. Gross, and C. Grove, along with various magazines and periodicals like BUFORA Journal, Flying Saucer Review, and UFO Report.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the meticulous cataloguing of UFO evidence, particularly photographs, and the exploration of cyclical patterns in UFO activity, referred to as "UFO waves." The editorial stance emphasizes a rigorous, evidence-based approach, evident in the detailed cataloguing methodology and the decision to exclude photographs that can be explained by conventional means. The publication aims to advance the field of ufology through systematic data collection and analysis, with a forward-looking perspective on predicting UFO phenomena.

This document is a supplement to the journal "UFOR", published by Contact International (UK), with an issue date of Autumn 1974. It primarily functions as a catalogue of UFO sightings and photographic evidence, with a strong emphasis on incidents from the 1960s. The publication details specific cases, including dates, locations, descriptions of observed objects, and the photographers involved. It also includes concluding remarks that delve into the complexities and reliability of UFO photographic evidence and the role of such catalogues in research.

Catalogue of UFO Incidents

The core of this document is a chronological listing of UFO sightings, presented with a reference number, date, location, description of the object, photographer (if known), and references to other publications. Notable entries include:

• 0208a: September 23rd, 1964, Cuernavaca, MEXICO. A discoidal object, photographed by an unnamed photographer.
• 0222a: July 4th, 1964, Bahia Blanca, ARGENTINA. An unknown structured object, photographed by Carlos Taboada.
• 0234a: November 9th, 1965, Niagara Falls, USA. Several luminous objects, photographed by William Stilwell.
• 0235a: December 12th, 1965, Rome, ITALY. A parachute-shaped object, photographed by Willy Colombini.
• 0253a: March 28th, 1966, London, Ohio, USA. An unusual aerial light, photographed by an unnamed photographer.
• 0256a: April 12th, 1966, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA. A greenish object of unknown identity, photographed by Douglas Herchmer.
• 0257a: April 17th, 1966, Pennsylvania, USA. A circular object at an unlocalised site, photographed by an unnamed photographer.
• 0258a: April 29th, 1966, Resistencia, ARGENTINA. A luminous object, photographed by an unnamed photographer.
• 0260a: May 16th, 1966, Copenhagen, DENMARK. A large luminous point of light, photographed by an unnamed photographer.
• 0262a: July 3rd, 1966, Near Lost Creek, West Virginia, USA. A domed disc, filmed by John Sheets.
• 0261b: July 16th, 1966, Farnham, CANADA. A kite-shaped object, photographed by Guy Demers.
• 0264a: August 23rd, 1966, Kandilli Observatory, near Istambul, TURKEY. An unknown aerial object, photographed by an unnamed photographer.

An addendum includes a further entry:

• 0230a: August 1965 (exact date uncertain), near Mexico City, MEXICO. An oval object, photographed by an unnamed photographer.

Concluding Remarks on Photographic Evidence

The concluding remarks section critically examines the reliability of UFO photographic evidence and the authors who compile such data. The author notes a "decidedly disturbing slackness" and a high number of "erroneously stated facts" in the literature, which can mislead both new and experienced researchers. Confusion regarding precise dates and times for photographic cases is highlighted as a significant issue that is exacerbated by the continued publication of differing data.

The text argues that while some may view catalogues as "dry and dull," they are essential for correlating data from diverse sources and revealing discrepancies and anomalies. The reliability of UFO photographs is a subject of ongoing controversy, but catalogues like the one presented serve as a "useful working tool" for comparing films and photographs within a temporal framework.

The analysis of the temporal distribution of UFO photographs is presented as offering insights into UFO activity. The author points out that the successful acquisition of a photograph often depends on a series of "accidents," such as a photographer being in the right place at the right time with a loaded camera. The tendency for photographers to carry cameras less frequently at night and the surprise or fear experienced by percipients can lead to a significant number of unsatisfactory photographs.

Despite these challenges, the study of the temporal distribution of photographs is deemed "most interesting." Specific clusters of photographs, such as those from June 30th, 1954, across Denmark, Norway, Minnesota, and Illinois, are noted for their potential significance, especially when multiple objects are involved. The author also highlights that the "very real increase in the number of UFO photographs taken during 1966 and 1967" likely reflects a heightened incidence of UFO activity rather than just increased camera usage.

The document concludes by suggesting that even if UFOs were only recorded on photographic emulsion (and not always seen visually), their temporal distribution would still suggest periods of higher activity. It is hoped that more analysis and useful work will be carried out in this field.

Publication and Availability

Contact International (UK) publishes the journal and offers current volumes and back numbers. Prices for current volumes are listed as 60p per single copy, excluding postage for UK or overseas destinations (surface or airmail). Overseas correspondents are advised to specify their preferred postal route. Members of Contact International (UK) receive the journal free. Additionally, blank duplicate maps of Britain and the World for plotting UFO data are available for 10p each or three for 20p (postage excluded). Monthly UFO frequency charts are also available for 25p per set (postage excluded). Orders are processed within approximately ten days. The publisher's address is 48 Crown Road, Wheatley, Oxford, OX9 1UL, United Kingdom.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the cataloguing of UFO sightings, the analysis of photographic and film evidence of UFOs, and the critical examination of the reliability of such data. The editorial stance appears to be one of rigorous archival work and a cautious, analytical approach to UFO phenomena, emphasizing the importance of accurate data and comparative studies. The publication aims to provide a valuable resource for researchers by meticulously documenting and presenting evidence, while also acknowledging and addressing the inherent difficulties and potential for error in the field.