UFO Register - Vol 04 parts 1-2 1973

Magazine Overview

Title: THE UFO REGISTER
Issue: VOLUME 4, PARTS I and 2
Date: June, 1973
Publisher: Data Research
Country: United Kingdom
Type: Magazine Issue

This issue of The UFO Register, published by Data Research and serving as the official organ of CONTACT INTERNATIONAL (U.K.), marks a significant expansion in its format, now printed on larger paper sheets. This development is presented as an anomaly during a period of general reduction in publication sizes due to paper shortages. The journal is dedicated to recording and disseminating factual information about the UFO phenomenon.

Editorial

The editorial, penned by J.B.Delair, highlights the enlarged format of the current volume, attributing it to the availability of larger paper stock acquired by Data Research. This is contrasted with the general trend of publications diminishing in size. Delair emphasizes that Data Research is a voluntary, unpaid effort undertaken by individuals in their spare time, clarifying misconceptions that it is a full-time research team. The editorial also notes the extensive work involved in investigating the UFO phenomenon, the growth of correspondence, and the increasing number of first-hand reports requiring thorough checking. The organization maintains a reference library but does not loan out publications. Arrangements can be made for photocopying certain materials. The editorial concludes by mentioning the magnificent second installment of Lucius Farish's catalogue of historical UFO sightings.

1971 General Analysis

This section provides a detailed analysis of UFO reports from 1971. A total of 562 separate reports were recorded, an increase from 1970, with a notable concentration of reports from the Yugoslavian region in the Autumn. The data is presented as provisional, acknowledging that more sightings may have occurred but were not reported or have yet to be processed. The analysis points out that much of the existing literature on UFOs often lacks sufficient documentation, making assessment difficult. Data Research personnel have attempted further investigations into these cases, though significant new information has been scarce, particularly for foreign sightings. Poorly detailed reports are classified under category D.

The issue presents a table summarizing the category totals for British and Foreign reports in 1971, categorized from A (Genuine UFOs) to P (Hoax or Hallucination). For example, British reports included 10 in Category A and 104 in Category D, while Foreign reports had 52 in Category A and 176 in Category D. The total number of reports analyzed was 62 in Category A, 47 in B, 117 in C, and 280 in D.

A significant number of foreign Category A reports are attributed to landing and low-hovering Type-I reports from Spain, based on the unpublished Ballester-Olmos catalogue. These are included due to their inherent character, even if some details are still under investigation.

UFO Categories

To assist readers unfamiliar with previous issues, the journal defines its recognized UFO categories:

• A. Genuine UFOs: Reports with abundant data suitable for thorough investigation.
• B. Probable UFOs: Data is nearly conclusive, but not 100%.
• C. Possible UFOs: Data is less than 75% conclusive, but the known details suggest a genuine UFO.
• D. Reports lacking sufficient data: Most objects viewed for 5 seconds or less fall into this category.
• E. Rocketry and space-capsule debris.
• F. Artificial satellite (e.g., Telstar).
• G. Meteor or Bolide.
• H. Fireball.
• J. Star.
• K. Planet (Mars and Venus are often misreported as UFOs).
• L. Parhelia, Aurora, Ball-Lightning, Mirages, Temperature Inversions, and comparable natural phenomena.
• M. Aeroplane (including helicopters).
• N. Meteorological and other Balloons.
• O. High Flying Birds, insects, or plant seeds (e.g., Thistledown).
• P. Hoax, or Hallucination.

The journal emphasizes that British reports are rigorously checked against satellite trajectories, re-entry dates, aircraft movements, and weather-balloon data to minimize misclassification of terrestrial objects. Only categories A, B, and C are discussed in the subsequent analyses.

UFO Types

The journal provides a detailed catalogue of UFO shapes and types reported in 1971, segregating them into common and less common categories. These codes are used in the summaries and analyses throughout the volume.

Common or Comparatively Common Types include:

• 1a Flat Disc (domeless)
• 1b Multisided (domeless)
• 1c Round, centrally domed
• 1d Dustbin-lid shaped
• Hatshaped
• 2 Bowl or Dish shaped (domeless)
• 3b Bowl or Dish shaped (domed)
• 4 Saucer shaped
• 5a Double-saucer shaped
• 5b Double-saucer shaped (markedly convex)
• 6 Rugby-ball shaped
• 7 Saturn-like
• 8a Sphere or Globe (plain surfaced)
• 8b Sphere or Globe (panelled)
• 8c Sphere or Globe (tailed)
• 8d Sphere or Globe (domed)
• 9 Egg-shaped
• 10 "Round"
• 11 Elliptical or "Oval"
• 11a "Oval" (with bar-like structure)
• 12 Pyramidal
• 13a Cone shaped (bullet-like)
• 13b Cone shaped (pointed end)
• 14a Rocket-like
• 14b Rocket-like (finless)
• 15 Arrow shaped
• 16 Torpedo shaped
• 17a Cigar shaped
• 17b Cigar shaped (dorsally domed)
• 17c Cigar shaped (dorsally and ventrally domed)
• 18a Cylinder shaped
• 18b Cylinder shaped (wholly or partially tapered)
• 18c Funnel-like or Bell-shaped
• 19 Rod-like
• 20 Bar shaped
• 21 Barrel-shaped
• 22 Bulb-like or Pear shaped
• 23 Humming- or Spinning-Top shaped
• 24 Mushroom shaped
• 24a Mushroom shaped (inverted position)
• 25 Doughnut shaped
• 26a Ring shaped (single)
• 26b Ring shaped (double or multiple)
• 26c Coil or Spring shaped
• 27a Wheel shaped (spoked)
• 27b Wheel shaped (cogged)
• 28 Spindle-shaped
• 29 Cross shaped
• 30 Multi-armed
• 31 Tentacled
• 32a Crescent shaped
• 32b V-shaped or Boomerang shaped
• 32c D-shaped or Heel-shaped

Uncommon and Rare Types include:

• 32d Delta-Wing shaped
• 41a Flat Triangle (domeless)
• 41b Flat Triangle (domed)
• 42 Diamond- or Lozenge-shaped
• 43 Oblong shaped
• 44a Square or Rectangular in shape
• 44b Square or Rectangular (six-sided or open box-like)
• 45 Diffuse or Cloud-like
• 46 Globular Lights
• 46a Globular Lights (tailed)
• 47 Star-like
• 48 Flare-like
• 49 Tadpole shaped
• 50 Squiggly shaped or "blobs of light"
• 51 Railway-carriage shaped
• 52 Jeep-like
• 53 Bootee shaped
• 54 House or Haystack shaped
• 55 Generator-like
• 56 Triglobular
• 56a Bi-Globular
• 57 Grid-like
• 58 Twin or multi-tailed
• 59 Irregularly shaped
• 60 S-shaped
• 61 Hook-shaped
• 62 Dumb-Bell shaped
• 62a Jelly-Bean shaped
• 63 Bird shaped
• 64 Propeller shaped
• 65 Concentrated Beams of non-dispersive light
• 66 Bobbin shaped
• 67 Acorn shaped
• 68 Heart shaped
• 69 Circular shaped central body
• 70 Hemispherical

Additionally, new UFO types reported in 1971 are defined, including:

• 8e Sphere: winged
• 8f Sphere: with "feet"
• 80 Capsule shaped
• 81 Double-Thimbell shaped
• 82 Undefinable
• 83 Pseudoplane
• 84 Lampshade shaped
• 85 Bell shaped
• 86 Inverted-Fan shaped
• 87 Pentagonal
• 88 Rhomboidal
• 89 Manoeuvring Smoke
• 90 Trapeze shaped
• 91 Mussel shaped

Cases involving entities without associated UFOs are designated by the letter E, and cases with intense or loud noises from an unknown aerial source are designated by X.

Catalogue of Historical UFO Reports

This section, by Lucius Farish, spans pages 19 to 24 and is presented as a catalogue of historical UFO reports. The specific content of this catalogue is not detailed in the provided pages, but it is highlighted as a significant contribution to the journal.

Catalogue of 1971 UFO Sightings

Pages 8 through 10 present a detailed catalogue of UFO sightings from 1971. Each entry includes the date, time, locality, UFO type (coded), UFO category (A, B, C, etc.), and references. For example, a sighting on January 1, 1971, in Kuusamo Saapunki, Finland, is categorized as '46' (Globular Lights) and 'B' (Probable UFOs), with references to pages 11:2-3 and 27.

Another entry on February 4, 1971, near Nienburg and Liebenau, Germany, is classified as '22' (C 13:32). Sightings in England include multiple entries from Leicestershire and Warwickshire on February 18, 1971, predominantly categorized under '8a' (Sphere or Globe) and 'C' (Possible UFOs).

International sightings include reports from Spain (Aznalcazar, Umbrete), USA (Maryland), France (L'Oise, Isère), Belgium (Dilbeek, Stene), Sweden (Overkalix), and Japan (Sapporo).

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the systematic collection, categorization, and analysis of UFO sightings. Data Research emphasizes a scientific approach to investigating the phenomenon, distinguishing between genuine reports and potential misidentifications or hoaxes. The journal aims to provide a comprehensive record of UFO activity, as evidenced by the detailed catalogues of types and sightings. The editorial stance is one of diligent, albeit voluntary, research into a complex and often misunderstood subject, with a commitment to providing factual information to its readership.

This document is Volume 2, Part 2 of the "UFO REGISTER", published in 1971 by Data Research, likely from the United Kingdom. It presents a detailed analysis of UFO reports from that year, focusing on sightings, temporal distribution, object characteristics, disruptive effects, and human and animal reactions.

Catalogue of Sightings

The core of the document is a comprehensive catalogue of UFO sightings from April to December 1971, with some undated entries. Each entry includes the date, time, and a specific location (town, region, country). For example, on April 2nd, 1971, at c.6.00 pm, a sighting occurred near the Macleay River, Kempsey, New South Wales, Australia. Another entry on May 5th, 1971, at 1.00 am, details an event in Villalba de los Alcores, Castilla la Vieja, Spain. The catalogue spans numerous countries, including France, Belgium, Australia, New Zealand, USA, Argentina, Finland, Spain, Rhodesia, Yugoslavia, England, Scotland, South Africa, Venezuela, Canada, Chile, and Brazil.

Temporal Distribution of Reports

The report analyzes the temporal distribution of UFOs during 1971. It indicates that, similar to previous years, more reports were received between 6 pm and midnight than during other periods. However, it notes that many reports lacked adequate time details, creating a hiatus in the data.

Materializations and Dematerializations

It is established that UFO manifestations can involve materialization and dematerialization. In 1971, several instances of these phenomena were recorded, particularly dematerializations, which were often described as abrupt. All recorded cases in 1971 were reported as noiseless.

Speeds and Motions of UFOs

UFO speeds and motions observed in 1971 varied considerably. The report suggests this variation might reflect observational shortcomings rather than actual changes in UFO performance. Speeds are classified as 'Hovering, or Stationary', 'Very Slow', 'Slow (steady)', 'Moderately fast', 'Fast', and 'Very fast', with various sequences of movement described, including erratic, zigzag, yo-yo, and spiral motions. The fastest speeds were described as 'tremendous' or 'terrific', while slower objects were noted as 'gliding' or 'lazily drifting'.

UFO Colours, Colour-Sequences, and Emissions

An interesting range of colors and color-sequences for UFOs was reported in 1971. Common colors included white, yellow, golden/amber, orange, orangy-red, red, pink, blue, pale green, silver, grey, and black. White-colored objects were often described as globular lights, as were several orange and red-hued objects. Silver-colored objects were considered significant, suggesting artificial origin. The report also details sequences like 'Red/Blue/White' and 'Blue/Red/Yellow'. During 1971, several UFOs were reported encircled by variously colored halos. Noiseless emissions, including silent explosions, were also summarized.

Disruptive Effects

The document details various disruptive effects attributed to UFO activity in 1971. These are categorized into:

Electro-Mechanical Effects:

Transient effects included engine failure (vehicular), lights failure (vehicular), power houses failure, and radio and TV interference.

Meteorological Effects:

Two cases of temperature fluctuations were reported, one near Bouake and Abidjan (Ivory Coast) and another near Cirencester (Gloucestershire). The discoloration (green) of ice near Kuusamo Saapunkki, Finland, was also noted.

Biological and Botanical Effects:

Cases included the temporary immobilization of humans and instances of flattened vegetation. Immobilization cases occurred in the Rusanac district of Yugoslavia. Flattened vegetation was reported in Finland and near Hainford, Norfolk.

Human and Animal Reactions

Few category A, B, or C reports specifically mention human reactions, but category D reports describe eyewitness reactions. These are summarized by fear, panic, curiosity, and amazement. Animal reactions were also noted, including restlessness, excitement, and flight in dogs, cats, horses, sheep, cattle, and fowls. A specific case involved birds singing at 3:00 am when a luminous object passed over Chalfont St.-Peter.

Observer Statistics

Data on eyewitnesses for 1971 is summarized by age and sex. The report notes that persons who spend a large proportion of their time outdoors or need to be aware of meteorological conditions were more likely to report UFO manifestations.

Key References

The document concludes with a "Key to References", listing publications consulted for the 1971 reports, including "Argosy" magazine, "Daily Express", "Daily Mail", "Flying Saucer Review", and various other journals and newsletters. It also acknowledges the assistance of CONTACT (UK) and numerous individuals who supplied information.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the systematic cataloguing and statistical analysis of UFO sightings and related phenomena. The editorial stance is one of objective reporting and data collection, aiming to provide a comprehensive overview of UFO activity in 1971 based on available evidence and published reports. The publication emphasizes the importance of detailed reporting and cross-referencing with primary sources.

Title: A CATALOGUE OF HISTORICAL UFO REPORTS: PART TWO
Publisher: THE UFO REGISTER
Issue Date: December, 1973
Volume: Volume Four, Part Two

This issue of THE UFO REGISTER features the second part of a detailed catalogue of historical UFO reports compiled by the American UFO historian Lucius Farish. It aims to retain the wording of the original accounts as closely as possible, with sources furnished for ease of relocation. Lucius Farish invites readers to send him any old accounts of UFOs they may encounter.

Contents

The issue includes an Editorial Comment, and several articles:

• "What Happened in Moron?" by E.Vincente
• "Quantification of the Law of the Times" by V-J. Ballester Olmos and M.Guasp
• "Yet Another UFO Landing?" by J.B.Delair
• "The Five Year (1967 – 1971) Analysis" by Data Research

Editorial

The editorial highlights important articles by three Spanish ufologists: Enrique Vincente, Vicente-Juan Ballester Olmos, and Miguel Guasp, presented for the first time in English. It expresses hope that English-speaking readers will appreciate the opportunity to read the views of foreign-based ufologists and better judge the quality of research in continental Europe.

"What Happened in Moron?" by Enrique Vincente

This article details an incident in Moron de la Frontera, Spain, on May 11, 1971. Following a storm, two identical circular areas, separated by 30 meters, were discovered in a burnt area of a sunflower field. These areas were surrounded by deep holes, with another larger hole in the center. The plant life within a halo of 25 meters was dead, appearing burnt but with green leaves and blackened stalks. Experts suggested an artificial phenomenon. The initial conclusion by farmers and the Civil Guard was that a thunderbolt had struck, but the author contends this explanation lacks validity. The incident attracted numerous visitors, complicating the investigation due to conflicting testimonies.

"Quantification of the Law of the Times" by V-J. Ballester Olmos and M.Guasp

This article is described as an extension or refinement of previous essays on Type-I UFO activity, including work by Jacques Vallee. It presents an analysis of the temporal distribution of Type-I UFO activity, potentially involving mathematical formulae. A slightly different version of this article appeared in the journal Data Net Report. The work indicates significant effort by qualified individuals to understand the UFO enigma, suggesting more accurate results have been achieved than the average UFO enthusiast might be aware of. It represents an encouraging trend towards a scientific investigation of UFO phenomena.

"Yet Another UFO Landing?" by J.B.Delair

This section is not detailed in the provided text, but J.B. Delair is listed as an author.

"The Five Year (1967 – 1971) Analysis" (Data Research)

This section is not detailed in the provided text, but Data Research is listed as the author.

Historical UFO Reports Catalogue (Lucius Farish)

The bulk of the scanned pages detail a chronological catalogue of historical UFO reports compiled by Lucius Farish, spanning from AD.1733 to AD.1856. These entries describe various aerial phenomena with details on date, location, shape, color, size, behavior, and sometimes physical traces.

**Key Incidents Highlighted:

• AD.1733: A phenomenon like burnished silver, darting and coruscating, seen near Weymouth, UK.
• AD.1744: An object shaped like a trumpet, emitting a clear white light, seen over London, UK.
• AD.1710: An apparition like a trumpet seen over Leeds, UK, emitting light.
• AD.1756: A pencil of light seen over Avignon, France, and a similar light seen over Edinburgh, UK, and Koin, Germany.
• AD.1758: A cone-shaped object emitting sparks over Edinburgh, UK, later seen over Glasgow as a fiery globe.
• AD.1758: A 'football'-like object descended over Colchester, UK.
• AD.1760: A blazing sphere emitting machinery-like noise over New England, USA.
• AD.1762: A large body writhing like a serpent, emitting dazzling light, seen over Bideford, UK.
• AD.1775: A ball of light like the full moon seen over Waltham Abbey, UK.
• AD.1779: A "strange meteor" described as a "ball of fire" with a long trail, seen in the southern sky.
• AD.1783: A fiery globe with a cone-shaped tail, rotating, seen over Edinburgh, UK, and a similar object seen over Glasgow.
• AD.1783: A large fiery sphere accompanied by a consort sphere seen over Greenwich, London, UK.
• AD.1798: An object described as an apothecary's pestle, then a hammer, then two half-moons, seen over Alnwick, UK.
• AD.1808: "Millions" of spherical bodies of dark brown color seen over Biskopsberga, Sweden, some falling and leaving a film.
• AD.1832: A "broad stream of light" descended from the zenith over the Tyrol.
• AD.1833: Several UFOs seen during a meteor shower in New York State, USA, including a fiery trail, a ball of fire, and a serpent-like object.
• AD.1833: A luminous "square table" object seen over Niagara Falls, USA.
• AD.1833: A luminous crescent-shaped object seen over Poland, Ohio, USA.
• AD.1836: Two round bodies observed crossing the face of the Sun by astronomer Fastorff, and similar bodies seen by astronomer Gruthinson.
• AD.1836: Luminous bodies seen moving from the Sun during a solar eclipse over Havana, Cuba.
• AD.1851: A tremendous number of self-luminous bodies seen moving across the sky for six hours over a zone of sky.
• AD.1856: A curious "meteor" resembling a large star, changing color from orange to green to red, seen over Foot's Cray, Kent, England.
• AD.1845: Three luminous discs rising from the sea, joined by streamers, seen from the ship Victoria.
• AD.1845: A huge fiery disc-like object seen over Florence, Italy.
• AD.1846: A luminous flying "disc" over Lowell, Massachusetts, USA, jettisoning fetid-smelling gelatinous matter.
• AD.1836: A luminous body with a central cavity seen over Cherbourg, France.
• AD.1847: A blazing object of spherical shape seen to rise vertically into clouds over London, UK.
• AD.1848: Two large objects, "as bright as stars", seen from Inverness, Scotland.
• AD.1848: Accounts of "two wheels of fire" that caused a crash on a ship.
• AD.1844: An unknown aerial object, as bright as Jupiter, sending out "quick flickering waves of light".
• AD.1838: A disc with a hook-like device projected from it, seen over India.
• AD.1833: A disc the size of the Moon, brighter than the Moon, seen over Poland, Ohio, USA.
• AD.1833: A brilliant hook-shaped body seen over Poland, Ohio, USA.
• AD.1831: A strange luminous object seen night after night by staff at Geneva observatory, Switzerland.
• AD.1831: A fiery disc-shaped object, the apparent size of the Moon, seen over Thuringia, Germany.
• AD.1826: A grey-coloured torpedo-shaped object emitting a sound like thunder, seen over Saarbrucken, France.
• AD.1820: Amazingly regular formations of unknown flying bodies seen passing over Embrun, France, in straight lines and turning 90°.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The issue strongly emphasizes the historical depth of UFO phenomena, presenting evidence that such aerial events have been observed for at least three centuries. It critiques past speculation and advocates for organized, scientific research into this material. The editorial highlights a "welcome scientific trend" in UFO research, moving away from idle speculation towards a more rigorous, evidence-based approach. The catalogue itself serves as a testament to the long history of these unexplained occurrences, suggesting that an in-depth investigation of these and other contemporary observers is long overdue. The publication aims to bring the work of foreign ufologists to a wider English-speaking audience and to foster a more serious approach to the study of UFOs.

This issue of Flying Saucer Review, volume xvii, number 28, dated May/June 1972, delves into the analysis of UFO landing traces and temporal patterns in UFO activity. The magazine features detailed reports and scientific investigations into anomalous phenomena.

The Holes: Castilla Gordillo Case

The issue prominently features an investigation into mysterious "mystery holes" found in an affected area, likely 'Castilla Gordillo' in Spain. According to a provisional report from May 18th, 1971, by investigators Osuna and Laffitte, the marks included:

• Two central orifices, 6 cm in diameter and 35 cm deep, 15 cm apart.
• A smooth circular zone around the orifices, extending 30 cm from their centers.
• Five entrances or depressions forming a pentagon outside the smooth zone, with a circumference of 1.10 meters. Each had an inclination of 30° downwards and forked into two short tunnels, suggesting the use of an instrument like a pitchfork.
• A circular area, approximately 25 meters in diameter, where small sunflower plants appeared affected by radial gusts.
• Two tangential circular areas, both exactly similar.

Luis Camacho Moreno of Young People's Radio of Moron and Juan Jose Plans from the newspaper "YA" provided pictorial ideas of these holes. A correspondent for the newspaper "ABC" of Seville further described "several perfectly symmetrical holes" and "more than a thousand sunflowers killed by strange burns." This correspondent also noted "two large circles several metres in diameter, inside of which there was another of turned-over and dried earth, surrounded by perfectly impressed and symmetrical holes, which perforated the land in an oblique form." The central hole was described as having a conical form, with a depth of about 40 cm, and damaged plants were exclusively inside the two larger circles.

Another detail mentioned was a circle about 40 meters in diameter, within which 64 hectares were affected, described as "enlarged like the waves on the water." The unusual process affecting the plants alarmed agronomists and geologists.

The Plants

Beyond the sunflower plants, thistles in the affected area also showed peculiar botanical changes, becoming twisted and colored reddish-white. The correspondent noted these as "strange things" occurring in the flora at the site.

The article concludes that the exceptional nature of these changes and the independent attestations support the conclusion of a UFO landing or close approach at 'Castilla Gordillo,' with the holes being the result of UFO activity. The sudden, overnight appearance and unusual shapes of the holes strongly indicate this.

Notes and Comments on Ground Markings

The article links the 'Castilla Gordillo' findings to previous UFO landing reports in the Sevillian area dating back to 1935 and 1938, referencing Vicente-Juan Ballester Olmos's work. It also draws parallels with similar bifurcating holes found at a UFO landing site in Marliens, France, in May 1967, as reported by Rene Fouere. Radial markings are compared to features observed at UFO "nests" in Tully, Queensland, in 1965, and a whirligig pattern in damaged crops at Whippingham, Isle of Wight, in July 1967.

Other related cases mentioned include the Desvergers encounter, where grass roots were charred while leaves remained fresh, and the work of Edward J. Ruppelt.

Quantification of the Law of the Times

This section, authored by Vicente-Juan Ballester Olmos and Miguel Guasp, presents a method to express the degree of resemblance of a given time distribution curve to a model curve. This study builds upon the work of Dr. Jacques F. Vallee and his "Law of the Times," which describes the temporal distribution of UFO landing cases.

Introduction and Motivation

The authors have verified the general correctness of Vallee's Law and found that other UFO data, when analyzed, yield results markedly different from those designed to confirm the law. They propose a standard rule in the form of simple equations to quantify this in a ratio-scale.

The "Law of the Times" concerns the distribution of UFO landing cases by hour of the day, exhibiting integral constancy. This is considered a fundamental pattern of the TYPE I phenomenon, with researchers consistently affirming that their data fits this temporal pattern.

Temporal Patterns of UFO Landings

The patterns are summarized as:

• Low proportion of daily reports, especially in the early morning.
• A progressive increment in the afternoon and evening, reaching a maximum around 9:00 PM.
• An almost exponential diminution thereafter, with a low minimum in the first hours of dawn.

This suggests that the number of observed landings is a function of potential eyewitnesses.

Methodological Approach

To express the degree of resemblance precisely, the authors developed objective formulae. They aim to obtain numerical values expressing the similitude between a random curve and a perfect curve based on TYPE I evidence from large sighting catalogues. This mechanism quantifies homogeneity and reliability of data groups.

Preliminary Conventions

The "satisfactory curve" is derived from the largest world-wide list of UFO landings (J.F. Vallee catalogue, 1971 version), containing 1367 entries, with 873 providing precise times. This data is plotted against a 24-hour period.

Notable Characteristics and Errors

Six notable characteristics are identified: sharpest maximum time, second sharpest maximum time, sharpest minimum time, percentage of sharpest maximum, percentage of second sharpest maximum, and percentage of sharpest minimum.

Errors (e) are defined in relation to these characteristics. The calculation involves differences (d) between magnitudes and their respective importance coefficients. For n=6 characteristics, with equal importance coefficients, the Degree of Resemblance (C) is expressed by the formula: C = 1 - Σ eᵢ.

Numerical Values of Errors

The errors are quantified based on the maximum possible differences in time (12 hours) and percentage (100%). The formula for C is derived as C = 1 - (d₁+d₂+d₃)/72 + (d₄+d₅+d₆)/600.

Discussion of the Limits of the Degree of Resemblance

The authors discuss the limits of C, noting that C=0% (total error of 100%) is practically unreachable. They propose that the most unequal curves will have a degree of resemblance of around 50%, and the scale of values ranges from 50% to 100%. They define ranges for C (50-60%, 60-70%, etc.) corresponding to different levels of curve similarity and randomness.

Summary and Recommendations

The developed equation (3) expresses the degree of resemblance of any curve to the TYPE-I UFO observation model. The authors suggest that this method can be applied to new sets of data and future catalogues. They posit that when fraudulent reports are removed, UFO landings represent a part of the phenomenon with the lowest percentage of misinterpretations. The "strangeness index" (J. Allen Hynek) is suggested as a factor that should increase the Degree of Resemblance, serving as an indicator of a sample's reliability.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The issue consistently focuses on the scientific investigation of UFO phenomena, employing statistical analysis, case studies, and comparative research. The editorial stance appears to be one of serious inquiry, seeking to understand UFO activity through empirical data and rigorous methodology, moving beyond anecdotal accounts to establish quantifiable patterns and reliable indicators of genuine phenomena. The use of mathematical models and the comparison of different UFO cases across geographical locations underscore a commitment to a systematic approach to ufology.

Title: THE UFO REGISTER
Issue: 5
Volume: 4
Date: 1973
Publisher: Data Research
Country: USA
Language: English
Cover Headline: THE FIVE YEAR (1967 - 1971) ANALYSIS.

This issue of The UFO REGISTER focuses on a comprehensive five-year analysis of UFO activity from 1967 to 1971, presenting detailed graphs and interpretations of observed trends and patterns.

Introduction

The introduction emphasizes the value of analyzing UFO activity over extended periods, not just annually, to discern longer-term trends. It highlights previous work by investigators like Bloecher, Ballester-Olmos, Bonabot, Keyhoe, Guieu, and Vallee, who have traced cyclic patterns in UFO activity. The current issue's completion of a detailed cataloguing of five consecutive years (1967-1971) allows for a more robust study of this period as a single unit. The analysis is based on category A, B, or C documented reports, providing a record for potential future restudy.

The Activity Graphs

Pages 17 and 18 feature annual graphs illustrating UFO activity and landings from 1967 to 1971. The graphs show a general progressive diminution of UFO activity from 1967 until mid-1971, with a slight increase observed thereafter. The period of lowest activity appears to be the first quarter of 1971. The most outstanding features are the 'high activity peaks' in late August and late October 1967, and mid-October 1971. The significance of the overall dimunition is not yet fully understood, though possible explanations are discussed.

Landings

The landings are indicated by symbols below the activity profiles: solid black circles for confirmed dry land landings, circled dots for suspected dry land landings, solid black squares for landings in water, and open squares for ground marks or 'nests' where the UFO was not observed. Undated landings are shown bracketed under the relevant months.

A key finding is that the distribution of landings does not always coincide with periods of greatest aerial activity. For instance, the mid-October 1971 'peak' had no confirmed landings, while the August 1967 'peak' had six. The analysis concludes that the number of landings for a specific period does not directly relate to the intensity of aerial activity for that same period. 1968 saw the greatest number of landings, with concentrated groups occurring during periods of moderate aerial activity. The longest unbroken series of landings took place between May 1968 and May 1969. After June 1969, confirmed landings became less frequent.

Some Background Factors

The analysis acknowledges that knowledge and interpretation of UFO activity are heavily dependent on the number and quality of eyewitness reports. Many manifestations likely go unreported, and details in reports may be absent, meaning the available data is a sample of the total activity. Despite this, the wide geographical, social, and temporal distribution of the material suggests the sample is generally 'representative' of the whole.

A Provisional Interpretation

A theoretical explanation is proposed, assuming ufos are artificially manufactured objects manipulated according to a plan. This interpretation suggests that extraterrestrial races might conduct extended, in-depth studies of Earth, launching expeditions at regular intervals. These intervals could equate to the observed 'high activity peaks'. Continuous, lighter surveillance might occur between major expeditions. The study of fauna and flora, with their seasonal variations, would require careful scheduling, potentially explaining the timing of these expeditions. The analysis suggests that the time elapsing between UFO expeditions might be approximately four years, two months, based on the observed patterns in this five-year period, though this differs from earlier findings by Vallee which suggested intervals of about two years.

Some Alternatives and Other Factors

This interpretation is acknowledged as hypothetical. The October 1971 'peak' is noted as an anomaly that doesn't fit perfectly but might represent the start of a new cycle. The analysis suggests that a five-year period is insufficient for a complete explanation, and further detailed analyses of other years (e.g., 1963-1966, 1972-1973) are needed. The current interpretation assumes a single source of UFOs, but the possibility of multiple non-terrestrial intelligences is considered. If multiple races are involved, their programs might be out of phase, potentially explaining the varying intervals between activity peaks. Alternatively, if only one group is involved, the reduced frequency of major visits might be due to the accumulation of data over time.

Conclusions

The substance of the analysis crystallizes the need for more work on the exact distribution in space and time of specific UFO types relative to environmental factors. It questions whether UFO manifestations occur randomly or are part of a comprehensive exploratory program. The issue also notes the growing interest in landing reports but highlights the limited work on detailed collation of associated ufonaut activities. The text poses questions about why crop fields are sampled and why these samples vary in size and distribution, suggesting a landed or low-hovering UFO as a possible explanation.

A preliminary step towards understanding this problem involves a thorough analysis of all UFO types and their temporal and geographic distribution, as well as the activities of their occupants, to provide a framework for further research.

References

The issue includes a list of 11 references, citing various reports, books, and articles on UFO phenomena from authors like Bloecher, Ballester Olmos, Bonabot, Keyhoe, Guieu, Vallee, Pereira, Delair, and Maxwell Cade.

Data Research Team

The Data Research Team responsible for this analysis includes F.R. Passey, D.N. Mansell, J. Sears, M. Howse, J. Loveridge, and J.B. Delair.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the statistical analysis of UFO activity, the identification of patterns and trends over time, and the interpretation of these patterns, particularly concerning landings and activity peaks. The editorial stance appears to be one of rigorous, data-driven investigation, acknowledging the limitations of the available evidence while seeking rational explanations for observed phenomena. There is a clear emphasis on the scientific approach to ufology, encouraging further detailed research and analysis.

This document is a single page from issue number 3 of a publication titled 'UFO Data-Landings'. It primarily serves as an informational page regarding the availability and pricing of back issues, the current volume, and supplementary materials such as maps and frequency charts.

Availability and Pricing

The current volume and many back numbers of 'UFO Data-Landings' are available ex-stock. Interested parties should apply to the Senior Research Officer at 75 Norreys Road, Cumnor, OX2 9PU. The prices are subject to change based on current stock levels.

The price for each current volume, which includes parts 1 and 2, is detailed as follows:

• Per single copy (U.K. only): 37p, excluding postage.
• Per single copy (overseas destinations only): 37p, excluding surface postage.
• Per single copy (overseas destinations only): 37p, excluding airmail postage.

A note (NB) advises overseas correspondents to specify their desired postal route when placing orders. If not specified, copies will be dispatched via surface mail. Members of the publication's organization receive copies of the journal free of charge.

Supplementary Materials

In addition to the magazine, blank duplicate maps are available for plotting specific UFO data, such as landing sites, type distribution, and 'ufocals'. These maps are offered for:

• Britain: Available upon request from Data Research.
• The world: Available upon request from Data Research.

The price for these maps is 3p each or three for 5p, with postage excluded.

Furthermore, monthly frequency charts are also available. The price for these charts is 5p per set, with postage excluded.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The content of this page suggests a focus on UFO research, data collection, and dissemination of information within the UFO community. The availability of specialized maps and charts indicates a commitment to providing tools for researchers. The editorial stance appears to be one of facilitating access to information and resources for its readership, particularly for those involved in detailed UFO data analysis.