UFO Quebec - No 26-27-28 - avr-dec1981 - No special

Magazine Overview

This is a special issue of UFO-QUEBEC, a quarterly magazine focused on information and research concerning unidentified flying objects (UFOs). The issue is dated April to December 1981 and is priced at $7.50. The cover features a black and white photograph of a dark, oval-shaped object in the sky, with the headline "INFORMATIONS RECHERCHES" (Information Research).

Editorial

The editorial section apologizes for the publication delay, attributing it to the departure of several collaborators and a prolonged stay by the editor in the USA and Sweden. The editorial also notes an increase in subscription costs to $10.00 per year due to rising expenses in printing, postage, and member list management, which have doubled since 1974. Despite the increase, it asserts that UFO-QUEBEC remains a good value compared to other international UFO publications. The magazine is seeking urgent help from translators (English-French, Spanish-French) and a volunteer for continuous typing of texts. The editorial thanks several individuals who have retired from active work with the corporation.

Table of Contents (Sommaire)

• The table of contents lists several articles, including:
• Editorial
• Investigations in Quebec
• The Challenge
• UFOs: A Parapsychological Phenomenon?
• UFOs in China
• A Photographic Case Not Retained
• Exclusive Photo Dossier
• An Opinion on the Jean Migueres Case
• Zozo and Co.
• UFO Phenomenon and Solar Activity (Part III)
• Sobeps Bookstore Service

Organization Chart

An organizational chart for UFO-QUEBEC is presented, detailing roles such as Honorary Members, Titular Members (founders), Adhering Members, Subscribers, and an Administrative Council (President, Vice-President, Secretary, Treasurer, Director(s)). It also shows positions for those in charge of investigations, reviews, and files.

Book Review: "La Mémoire des O.V.N.I." by Jean Bastide

This section reviews Jean Bastide's book, published by Mercure de France. The reviewer notes that even if UFOs don't exist, they continue to inspire large books. The book is described as a detailed exploration that captivates the reader. Bastide's work analyzes collected information and researches ancient sources that might prove the existence of visitors from elsewhere, suggesting that mythology and folklore could be inspired by such contacts. The review also touches upon the concept of extraterrestrials reaching Earth through space-time and the implications of interstellar travel at near-light speeds on time perception.

Call for Renewal

There is a reminder for investigators and adhering members to renew their membership cards, with contact information for Mr. Jean Bastide in Aix-en-Provence, France.

Article: "ENQUETES AU QUEBEC" (Investigations in Quebec)

This article details a UFO sighting that occurred in the third week of October 1971, in the region of Joliette, Quebec. The witness, Mme Gisèle Léveillée, was driving alone when she observed a luminous, ovoid object with a protuberance or "candle" on top. The object was seen by other drivers, who signaled to her. Mme Léveillée described the object as rotating and having a distinct, opaque appearance with a luminosity similar to electric welding. The object was estimated to be about 2 meters in diameter. The rotation seemed to originate from the base of the antenna. After a complete rotation, a flash or luminous projection emanated from the object, casting a uniform halo. The analysis of the observation, conducted by Robert Kurylo, notes that Mme Léveillée is a credible witness. The article also mentions other potential witnesses and nearby locations where UFOs have been observed.

Article: "UN CAS PHOTOGRAPHIC NON RETENU" (A Photographic Case Not Retained)

This section is not fully detailed in the provided OCR, but it suggests a discussion about a photographic case that was not included.

Article: "UNE OPINION SUR LE CAS JEAN MIGUERES" (An Opinion on the Jean Migueres Case)

This section likely presents an opinion or analysis related to a specific UFO case involving Jean Migueres.

Article: "MASCOUCHE 5/08/1980" (Mascouche 5/08/1980)

This article, written by Daniel Lalonde and investigated by Philippe Blaquière, reports on a sighting by Claude Baron on August 5, 1980, in Mascouche-Repentigny, Quebec. Baron observed an object, initially mistaken for a plane, that ascended rapidly and disappeared. He later saw it again, moving at approximately 30 km/h at an altitude of 150 meters, parallel to his car. The object was described as oval-shaped with a bulge on top, having a matte silver-grey color, and appearing opaque. It was estimated to be about 13-15 cm across at arm's length, suggesting a real thickness of about 8 meters. The analysis by P. Blaquière rates the strangeness of the case as 8 and the probability index as 6.

Article: "DES ASTRONOMES AMATEURS ET PROFESSIONNELS SE QUESTIONNENT ET CONTINUENT D'OBSERVER L'OBJET."

Authored by Marc Leduc, this article discusses how amateur and professional astronomers have been regularly observing an unidentified celestial body since May 1981. The object, initially mistaken for Mercury, was observed to disintegrate and disappear. The group, including Gilbert Saint-Onge and his friends, alerted professional astronomers. Normand Reneaud, an astrophysics student, and Marc Leduc, an investigator for UFO-Quebec, became involved. The article details the challenges of observation, including the object's brief duration and its proximity to the sunset.

Article: "UN RAPPORT D'OBSERVATION TYPIQUE."

This section presents a typical observation report from June 17, 1981, provided by Gilbert Saint-Onge. The object was observed using binoculars starting at 20:35:00 and was spotted at 20:44:00. It remained visible until its explosion at 20:53:00, with residual particles visible until 20:55:00. The object moved rapidly, in the opposite direction of Venus. Its explosion was described as instantaneous, like a firework, with fragments becoming visible before separating. The observation lasted 9 minutes and 12 seconds. The object was estimated to be at an elevation of 17 to 20 degrees above the horizon. It appeared as a roughly spherical luminous form, metallic grey in color, with a lighter contour and a darker center. After the explosion, 5 to 7 luminous points appeared in a "W" formation, with some points regaining brightness before all disappeared. Various optical instruments were used for observation.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around UFO sightings, investigations, and analysis, particularly within Quebec. There's a focus on credible witness accounts, the scientific approach to studying these phenomena, and the involvement of both amateur and professional observers. The magazine appears to maintain a serious and investigative stance, aiming to document and understand unexplained aerial phenomena. The editorial also highlights the financial challenges of publishing such a specialized magazine and the need for volunteer support.

This issue of UFO-QUÉBEC, dated 1981, focuses on various UFO/UAP (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena) sightings and analyses, featuring articles by Daniel Lalonde, Richard Bastien, and Jean Pierre Petit.

Article: The Phenomenon of June 28, 1981

The first section presents a phenomenon that occurred on June 28, 1981, starting at 8 PM and concluding with an explosion at 8:40 PM. Seven drawings illustrate the progression of this event. The text notes that with practice, observers can expect to witness such phenomena for several minutes. The object is typically observed at about 40 degrees north of west and less than 20 degrees elevation. While an observation team led by Gilbert Saint-Onge attempted to use telescopes, the object was most often spotted with binoculars. Numerous photos were taken, capturing various stages, but enlargements lost too much contrast for publication. The conclusion suggests the object might be visible in August and offers various hypotheses, including balloons, misidentifications of planets like Mercury, clouds, reflections of celestial bodies, or even extraterrestrial mother ships.

Table of Observations

A table lists numerous observation dates from May to July, detailing the duration, location (Lost River, Dorval, Montréal), elevation, position, whether photos were taken, and the instrument used (telescope, binoculars, or telescope/binoculars). Locations include Lost River, Dorval, and Montréal in Canada.

Article: An OVNI Seen Through a Telescope?

Authored by Daniel Lalonde, this article details an observation by Jean-Luc Thibeault in mid-November 1978, around 9 PM (HNE), at Camp Martin Senneterre in Abitibi, Canada. Thibeault, an amateur astronomer, was observing the sky when he noticed an unusual object. Initially mistaking it for a star, he was surprised to find it was an object with two rows of luminous squares and a glow at each end when viewed through his telescope (50X magnification). He described it as immobile, like a star, and considered it might be a satellite. Later, he found it resembled descriptions in books about UFOs, specifically referencing Adamski.

The analysis of the observation notes the object was located to the northeast (azimuth) and appeared star-like to the naked eye. Through the telescope, its discoidal shape, 'portholes,' and lights at the extremities were visible. The object was distinct, immobile, at high altitude, and had a yellowish-white color. The phenomenon lasted ten minutes. The case is compared to an observation by Adamski in October 1946, which also described a dirigible-like object with 'rectangular windows.' The author suggests further evaluation is needed due to a lack of information about the witness's personality.

Article: Myriad of Colored Lights

Authored by Richard Bastien, this article reports on an observation by three 14-year-old girls: Josée, Nathalie Talbot, and Linda Blais, on the evening of January 25, 1981, in Sherbrooke, Canada. The girls reported seeing a white luminous object flying over the city. The object moved to the right and disappeared behind a building. From a vantage point on a hill, they saw the object again, closer and more distinct. It was described as ovular, emitting a clear white light from the top, with a multitude of red, yellow, and blue lights underneath, surrounded by larger lights of varying colors. The object passed at a 45-degree elevation. The girls fled in fear. The apparent size was estimated between 5 cm and 60 cm from their eyes, corresponding to a 5-degree arc. Two witnesses noted the object rotated slowly. They believed it landed behind a hill, but an investigation found nothing. The incident was reported to the police. The following day, the girls found no trace in the snow. The analysis suggests the witnesses were shocked, and their accounts, while having minor discrepancies due to stress, were consistent in their impressions. The object's size was estimated between 6 and 17 meters, and a similar object was seen in Lennoxville five days prior.

Drawings by Linda Blais, Josée Talbot, and Nathalie Talbot detail the object's appearance, including its white top, colored lights on the sides, and a dark underside with rotating black rays.

An annex details an observation by Marcelle Talbot (Nathalie's sister) on the same evening, who saw two red lights moving rapidly. She described the object as having a clear white top, with turning red, yellow, and blue lights, surrounded by smaller lights. Constable René Barrette reported that the young witnesses stated the UFO had 'immobilized' itself before moving away, a point that contradicts later testimonies. A nearby municipal water service pump was operating during the observation, possibly masking any sound from the UFO.

Article: The Challenge

Authored by Jean Pierre Petit, this article presents a laboratory-based perspective on UFOs. Petit concludes that UFOs are extraterrestrial flying machines that use two primary methods of propulsion. The first method involves magnetohydrodynamics (MHD), where the craft manipulates ambient air using Laplace forces (J x B) to create a vacuum in front and propel itself forward without a sonic boom or turbulence. This requires significant energy, comparable to supersonic flight, in the hundreds of megawatts. He contrasts this with the Concorde's energy consumption. Petit discusses various theoretical MHD geometries, including spheres, cylinders, and discs, noting that some craft have parietal electrodes that appear as 'portholes' at night. Other craft operate by induction, accelerating air with progressive waves, similar to proton cannons.

Petit explains that these machines are studied for precise ionization control of the air near the hull, potentially using alkali salts (sodium or cesium) or microwaves (3000 MHz) to create free electrons. He suggests that microwaves can have defoliant effects and disturb the nervous systems of mammals. He also mentions UFOs emitting 'truncated rays' for environmental composition analysis.

He addresses the phenomenon of sudden appearances and disappearances and right-angle turns, suggesting that MHD alone cannot explain these. Petit speculates that a second, unknown physical principle is involved, moving into the realm of speculation beyond current scientific understanding. He proposes that our understanding of geometry is limited and that our four-dimensional world might be part of a ten-dimensional universe, suggesting that dimensions beyond the standard metric ones could be involved.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue consistently explores the phenomenon of UFOs/UAPs through witness testimonies, observational data, and scientific analysis. The editorial stance appears to be one of open inquiry, presenting various cases and hypotheses, from conventional explanations to more speculative theories about advanced extraterrestrial technology. There is a clear interest in documenting sightings, analyzing their characteristics, and exploring potential technological explanations, even if they extend beyond current scientific paradigms. The magazine encourages amateur observations and aims to compile information on the subject.

This issue of the magazine, dated May 1981, features a cover headline posing the question: "LES O.V.N.I.-UN PHENOMENE PARAPSYCHOLOGIQUE? MON OEIL!!" (UFOs - A Parapsychological Phenomenon? My Eye!!). The content delves into the scientific and physical aspects of UFO phenomena, moving beyond purely parapsychological explanations. The issue is authored by Jean Pierre PETIT, a researcher at the CNRS in France, and includes contributions and references to international scientific publications.

Theoretical Framework: Super Relativity and Matter-Energy

The article begins by exploring the concept of 'Super Relativity,' suggesting that the universe has four dimensions and that parallel universes might be illusions arising from different observational perspectives. It posits a single Kantian reality with multiple facets, where observed particles are merely different ways of observing the same object. This 'Super Relativity' implies that perception depends on the relative configuration of the observer and the observed, going beyond current relativistic theories. A significant consequence discussed is the potential non-conservation of matter-energy, linked by Einstein's E=mC² equation. The author uses the analogy of a bookmark in a book to illustrate how matter-energy might be conserved across different 'pages' or dimensions of reality. This theoretical framework is presented as a potential explanation for the 'jumps' or anomalous movements of UFOs, which appear to violate classical conservation laws.

The author raises a serious concern: if a civilization can transfer large masses, it can also transfer energy. Injecting the equivalent of tens or hundreds of tons of matter as energy into our space could potentially destroy the Earth. This highlights the dual nature of advanced technology, where the ability to manipulate matter and energy also presents a profound risk of self-destruction. The article suggests that extraterrestrials might avoid direct contact to prevent the transmission of dangerous scientific knowledge that could lead to humanity's downfall.

Scientific Investigations: Microwaves and Auditory Phenomena

The issue then shifts to scientific investigations, particularly focusing on the "Microwave Auditory Phenomenon." It references two articles from the "PROCEEDINGS OF THE I.E.E.E." (January 1980): "Biological Effects and Medical Applications of Electromagnetic Energy" by James C. Lin, and "Stable, Inhomogeneous, Time-Varying Magnetic Fields" by Sergio X. Salles-Cunha, Joseph H. Battocletti, and Antony Sances, Jr. The latter is translated by L. Michel DELORME.

The "Microwave Auditory Phenomenon" study by James C. Lin describes how short rectangular microwave pulses can produce audible sounds in humans. When a subject's head is exposed to a conical antenna emitting microwaves, they can perceive "clicks" or "buzzes" emanating from within or behind their head. These sounds are produced by modulated microwave emissions, with pulse widths of 1 to 32 microseconds and frequencies around 2450 MHz. The intensity required is surprisingly low, with a maximum power density of 300mW/cm² and an average power as low as 0.1 mW/cm².

This phenomenon is directly linked to UFO witness testimonies. The article highlights the case of Betty and Barney Hill, who reported hearing strange, irregular "Beep" sounds before and after their alleged abduction. These sounds, described as electronic and coming from the rear of their car, are compared to the laboratory-induced microwave auditory effects. The author suggests that these sounds perceived by the Hills could easily be associated with microwaves, potentially produced intentionally by the occupants of a UFO for psychological and physical manipulation.

Human Tolerance to Magnetic Fields

The second part of the "PROCEEDINGS OF THE I.E.E.E." study, translated by L. Michel DELORME, examines human tolerance to stable, inhomogeneous, and time-varying magnetic fields. The research indicates that there is limited controlled study on human tolerance, and more investigation is needed into exposure time, intensity, and individual positioning relative to the source. Studies suggest that humans can tolerate magnetic fields up to 2 Tesla for short periods without apparent effects on respiration, pulse, or reflexes. However, exposure to higher fields, such as those encountered in cyclotron adjustments (up to 2 T) or near powerful magnets (up to 10 T), can induce symptoms like nausea, disorientation, and bone pain. Reports from the USSR also indicate multiple anomalies in workers exposed to high magnetic fields.

The article concludes that there is no apparent contraindication for human exposure to magnetic fields below 2 Tesla for short durations. However, it advises caution regarding stress, high-tech tasks in high magnetic field regions, and uncontrolled exposure times. Specific limits are suggested for exposure near accelerators and bubble chambers, with recommendations for homogeneous fields (0.03 T for the whole body, 0.07 T for hands) and variable fields (0.2 T/m).

The Bala Lake Incident

The issue also reports on the Bala Lake incident, which occurred in June 1966. Approximately 30 soldiers from a British Army "Flash Unit" were deployed to investigate a reported "burning plane" in the Bala Lake region of Wales. Upon arrival, their vehicles, including a jeep and several trucks, began to stall sequentially at a specific point in a valley. The soldiers themselves experienced a sudden loss of will and felt "nailed to the spot," unable to advance. They were unable to communicate with another unit on the other side of the valley, which was experiencing similar immobilization issues. The operations were eventually halted. The author draws a parallel between this incident and the findings on human tolerance to magnetic fields, suggesting a possible link between the observed phenomena and electromagnetic influences.

French UFO Research and GEPAN

The article highlights the progress of UFO research in France, noting that the GEPAN (Group for the Study of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena), dependent on the CNES, would have a stand at the Bourget Air Show. This signifies a move towards integrating UFO studies alongside aviation and space technology. The author mentions a significant scientific battle that took place over five years, culminating in a 160-page report on magnetohydrodynamics and UFO phenomena. This report, submitted to a scientific expert commission, received a positive evaluation: "Solid and well-constructed work, the basic ideas are sound. To be developed theoretically and experimentally." This is seen as a breakthrough, breaking a "wall of silence" and validating the scientific approach to UFO research in France, akin to a "small Condon commission" with a positive outcome, refuting the conclusions of the original Condon Report.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the scientific and physical underpinnings of UFO phenomena, moving away from purely parapsychological explanations. The magazine emphasizes the importance of rigorous scientific investigation, drawing parallels between theoretical physics (Super Relativity, matter-energy equivalence) and experimental findings (microwave auditory effects, magnetic field tolerance). There is a strong stance that UFOs represent a serious, crucial problem, not merely a distraction for dreamers. The editorial perspective champions a "nuts and bolts" approach to studying UFOs, focusing on physical evidence and scientific principles. The potential for advanced technology, both human and extraterrestrial, to pose risks of self-destruction is also a significant underlying concern. The article implies that extraterrestrial visitors, if they exist, are likely advanced beings who avoid direct contact due to humanity's potential for misuse of knowledge.

This issue of UFO-Québec, identified as Volume 21, Number 3 & 4 from 1975, with a cover headline focusing on 'LES O.V.N.I. EN CHINE' (UFOs in China), presents a collection of articles and analyses related to unidentified flying objects. The magazine is published by UFO-Québec, based in Canada, and is in French.

Articles and Investigations

UFOs in China

The issue features three articles translated by Wido Hoville, originally published in Dagong Bao, Hong Kong, in November 1980, and transmitted to Stanton T. Friedman in December 1980.

Premier Article: Reports a recently photographed unidentified flying object in China, possibly the first such photo from the country. It also references an earlier UFO observation in China dating back to 1056 AD, describing an object as bright as the sun with a gold line, seen in the province of Young.

Deuxième Article: Details an event on September 23, 1978, where several hundred air force members in Jin Sho, China, witnessed an object with two large headlights and a white, brilliant tail at an altitude of approximately 6,000 meters. The object was described as moving at an incredible speed and occupying about 35 degrees of the visual field.

Troisième Article: This report originates from Mr. Cheung Chou Shun and describes an object seen on July 26, 1977. The object was spiral-shaped, brilliant, with a yellowish center and blueish rings, observed at sixty degrees elevation and traveling parallel to the horizon. The article notes a variety of UFO reports from China in recent years, with many occurring after 1977, suggesting that research may have become permissible after this date.

Case Study: The Hill Incident and Electromagnetic Effects

An article discusses a case involving 30 British soldiers who experienced inexplicable phenomena, including a strange yellow-orange light and unusual sounds. The light moved erratically before disappearing. The incident was declared 'Secret,' and a local farmer reported the disappearance of 37 sheep during the same week. The article connects this to electromagnetic interference, suggesting it could be used to deter intruders or for repair purposes. It draws parallels with the 'Hill' case and mentions the potential for intentional mental manipulation via microwaves. The text also references studies on human tolerance to magnetic fields, citing Beischer's work on cyclotron operators experiencing nausea and disorientation when exposed to strong magnetic fields.

Technical and Physical Explanations for UFO Phenomena

Another section emphasizes the importance of technical and physical explanations for UFO phenomena, citing studies published by I.E.E.E. in January 1980. It argues that these studies are necessary for a better understanding of UFOs and reinforce the credibility of cases like the Hill incident, particularly regarding microwave interference. The article criticizes 'new ufologists' for focusing too much on parapsychology and intentionally downplaying the technical aspects, which it believes point to an extraterrestrial origin.

Photo Analysis: Véronique Cyr's Photographs

Authored by Marc Leduc, this section details an investigation into three photographs taken by Véronique Cyr in Québec City on July 18, 1979. Véronique and her mother were staying at a hotel and decided to take photos of their surroundings. Véronique took three photos through her hotel room window. Upon developing the photos, she noticed that some images were unexpectedly dark, and three photos showed an inexplicable luminous form.

Initially, the luminous form was described as white, roughly rectangular, and appeared in different positions (upright and horizontal) across the three photos. The analysis, conducted with the help of Dr. Don Donderi and Mr. Robert Lamarche (a photography expert from McGill University), suggested that the luminous form was likely a reflection of the camera's flash gun, possibly from the double-pane insulating windows. Several points supported this hypothesis:

1. The luminous form appeared to move closer to the photographer in successive shots, mirroring the photographer's own movement towards the window.
2. The orientation of the form (upright vs. horizontal) seemed to correspond to the camera's orientation (vertical vs. horizontal).
3. A doubling of the form in the third photo could be explained by oblique angles of reflection off the window panes.
4. Reflections were also noted on the mother's handbag and the window sill.

Despite Véronique's persistent impression of something fleeing the landscape, the photographic evidence and analysis led to the conclusion that the luminous form did not represent a solid, luminous body. The study ultimately dismissed the case, attributing the phenomenon to a reflection from the camera's flash, and noting that memory can be fallible.

Dossier Photo Exclusif: Jacques Boucher's Photograph

This section, by Denis Boucher and Philippe Blaquiere, presents an analysis of a UFO photograph taken by Jacques Boucher in the summer of 1967 while he was serving with the Canadian Coast Guard at Pointe-Edward, near Sydney, Nova Scotia. Denis Boucher, an investigator for UFO-Québec, obtained the original negative from his brother Jacques, who had previously been reluctant to discuss the event due to disbelief from others.

The analysis, conducted by Dr. Don Donderi and Robert Lamarche, experts in photography and photogrammetry from McGill University, found no reason to doubt the authenticity of the negative or the object depicted. However, the photo itself is described as blurry. The report indicates that the object appeared on a photo taken at a Canadian Coast Guard base.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently explores UFO phenomena with a focus on detailed case studies, photographic evidence, and scientific analysis. There is a clear emphasis on seeking technical and physical explanations for sightings, often contrasting this approach with more speculative or parapsychological interpretations. The editorial stance appears to favor rigorous investigation and the presentation of evidence, even if it leads to the rejection of a case, as seen in the analysis of Véronique Cyr's photographs. The inclusion of historical cases and international reports (such as those from China) broadens the scope of the investigation, aiming to contribute to a comprehensive understanding of the UFO phenomenon.

Title: UFO-Québec
Issue: 41
Volume: 11
Date: July 1979
Publisher: UFO-Québec
Country: Canada
Language: French
Cover Headline: UNE OPINION SUR LE CAS JEAN MIGUERES (An Opinion on the Jean Miguères Case)

This issue of UFO-Québec presents a critical analysis of the case of Jean Miguères, a self-proclaimed extraterrestrial contactee. The magazine aims to dissect his claims, publications, and public activities, offering a skeptical perspective on the evidence presented.

Evaluation of a Negative by D. Donderi

The issue begins with an evaluation by D. Donderi of a photographic negative related to a UFO sighting. The negative was examined using a Zeiss photo microscope at McGill University. While the grain of the negative was made visible through magnification, no manipulation traces were found, suggesting the negative was in its original condition. The object and the scene in the photograph are blurred, indicating probable movement of both the camera and the object during the exposure. Due to the limited variation in the depth of field, determining the distance of the UFO is not possible. The negative exhibits scratches and pressure marks, which are attributed to the film handling process, not the UFO itself. The negative is numbered 12, from a roll of twelve photos. The pressure marks, particularly at the end of the film, are suspected to be caused by the film winding mechanism. Further details observed under magnification include four or five parallel lines on the object's grain, visible on the enlarged negative but less so on the printed photo. The object is described as having an irregular shape, with a lighter area at the top possibly reflecting light. The analysis suggests the camera captured the lower flat part and a portion of the superstructure of a circular object. However, the irregular shape contradicts a perfect circular projection, and the blurriness is likely due to the object's movement and the camera's shutter speed. The document concludes that insufficient information is available to definitively explain the irregularities.

Supplementary Details: The Gaspésie Encounter

This section recounts a sighting by Jacques in Gaspésie in August 1980. Jacques, then 19 years old and not a professional photographer, was relaxing on a warm summer afternoon when he observed an unusual object through an open window. He called several other people, and a group of 7 or 8 people witnessed the object hovering stationary at a low altitude. Jacques managed to take only one photograph because he had only one shot left on his film. The object remained motionless for about ten minutes, tilted at an approximate 35-degree angle. No sound was heard. The object was described as dark gray, metallic, well-defined, and without vapor, smoke, or signal lights. After about ten minutes, it moved slowly towards the sea and disappeared from view. Jacques, now uninterested in UFOs, remains convinced he saw a flying saucer.

An Opinion on the Jean Miguères Case by Marc Leduc

This article, written by Marc Leduc, provides a critical review of the case of Jean Miguères, based on his books and public activities. The author summarizes Miguères' case, which involves alleged extraterrestrial contact, and offers commentary on the debate surrounding these activities. The article aims to participate in the search for truth while pointing out exaggerations and fabrications by Miguères.

The Books of J. Miguères

Miguères has published two books. The first is described as a fantasy narrative that won an award in that literary category. It details a road accident allegedly caused by extraterrestrials, events preceding it, Miguères' rehabilitation, the UFO sighting, the materialization of an extraterrestrial, telepathic messages, and the contactee's mission. The second book contains anecdotes of Miguères' encounters with people involved in the UFO phenomenon, presented to convince readers of the veracity of his extraterrestrial contact.

The Extraterrestrial's Guinea Pig

On August 11, 1969, Jean Miguères, driving an ambulance in France, reported observing a cloud-like formation and then colliding with an oncoming car. In his damaged ambulance, he claims an extraterrestrial being materialized, leading to the first telepathic contact and the revelation that he was a missionary 'guinea pig'.

The Activities of the Supposed Contactee

Miguères claims to have survived numerous, often fatal, accidents, attributing his rehabilitation to extraterrestrial intervention that 'redimensioned' him, granting him extraordinary abilities and a mission to serve them. He promotes his case through books, conferences, and media appearances. In Quebec, he appeared on popular TV shows hosted by Réal Giguère and Michel Jasmin, and was featured in La Presse. He also appeared on community TV channels.

The author's opinion on Miguères' books is that they are instruments for promoting his contactee claims, going beyond mere storytelling to present his experiences as proof of extraterrestrial contact. His media activities are seen as an attempt to leverage his accident to gain acceptance for his contact claims. He typically presents himself with confidence, which the public may interpret as a sign of veracity. Miguères' conferences follow a similar pattern, presenting his story chronologically and preemptively addressing potential objections. He employs tactics like requiring questions to be submitted in writing for his review, allowing him to select and answer those he deems most relevant.

Regarding his reception by community television audiences, the opinion is that his credibility is minimal. The author suggests that viewers are accustomed to a lighthearted approach to various subjects, lacking rigor. Miguères' discourse ranges widely, from extraterrestrials and astral bodies to the CIA, the Force, the end of the world, and conspiracy theories.

The Debate Raised by His Activities

Jean Miguères actively promotes his case, supported by publishers, newspapers, and individuals inclined to believe him. However, he faces adversity. The ufological group 'Ouranos' supports him, as do individuals like Jimmy Guieu and Guy Tarade. In Quebec, Richard Glen and members of cosmogony and paranormal study societies show him warm support. Conversely, several groups and individuals in the ufological community denounce his case. These include Jean-Pierre Petit (astrophysicist), Pierre Guérin (astrophysicist), journalist Jean-Claude Bourret, journalists from Science et Vie, Le Provencal, and Le Méridional. Various ufological associations in Switzerland, France, Belgium, Luxembourg, and Great Britain also express skepticism or denunciation, as does Fernando Cerda Guardia in Spain and UFO-Québec.

Remarks on Jean Miguères' Claims Regarding Confrontations with Quebec Scientists

UFO-Québec relies on European ufologists to rectify Miguères' fabrications and contributes its own findings from Quebec. The magazine notes that European ufologists have greater ease in examining and verifying contactee claims. The article references exchanges with various groups and individuals, including the Association d'Etude sur les Soucoupes Volantes (AESV), which synthesized arguments against Miguères' case. Key points of contention include:

• Miguères' remarkable recovery is not unique and not necessarily miraculous.
• The reality of the accident does not prove the reality of the contact.
• Miguères' case shares characteristics with other dubious contactee cases (e.g., Adamsky, Vorilhon).
• His personal investigation of his own case is not a reliable basis for truth.
• Medical documents claiming he died three times lack weight.
• Some individuals mentioned by Miguères, like Mr. Pagès, do not support his claims.
• A photo in his book shows the ambulance after the accident without a visible rearview mirror, contradicting his claim of using it.
• Miguères claims to have been teleported with Tarade and Guieu on a non-existent highway, leading to potential defamation lawsuits against AESV.
• His claims of telepathically obtaining information about planets and the solar system are contrasted with evidence suggesting natural, non-telepathic communication methods.
• A photo in his first book, supposedly showing an extraterrestrial, requires significant imagination to discern, similar to interpreting cloud formations.
• Various groups have denounced Miguères for distorting communications through out-of-context interpretations.

Further Analysis of Miguères' Case

The article continues to scrutinize Miguères' second book, focusing on Chapter V. It points out discrepancies, such as Miguères claiming contact with the University of Montreal, which is not mentioned in the book. It also questions the existence of a 'University of Plessisville' and clarifies that Professor Jean-Paul Pageau is recognized for his knowledge in cosmogony, while Louis Bégin, who drove Miguères, modestly states he was merely the driver. The author disputes Miguères' claim of hundreds of former students attending a congress, suggesting a much smaller number, many of whom were curious onlookers. The claim that the national anthem was sung is also questioned, with a popular refrain about Miguères being mentioned instead. The technical aspects of Télécable and Vidéotron are compared to national French channels, a comparison deemed potentially misleading given the difference in production quality. Richard Glen is described as a television producer, but the context suggests he might be an amateur producer of community cable shows. Miguères' assertion of being confronted by secret agents and military personnel is also questioned, with the author noting his own presence at a meeting with Miguères, organized by Glen, which felt more like a social gathering than an interrogation.

Conclusion

The author concludes that this text is not an investigative report but an opinion. The opinion is that Jean Miguères' case lacks positive verification and that he presents incoherences, inaccuracies, and possibly a fabricated story of contact.

References

The article lists ten references, including Miguères' books, newspaper articles, letters from individuals and ufological groups, and publications from organizations like AESV and Inforespace.

Perry Petrakis' Statement

Perry Petrakis, Director of Publication for 'A.E.S.V.', states that his association undertook an investigation into the Miguères case without passion or bias. He notes that subsequent to their findings, which suggested the Miguères affair was a vast hoax designed to generate significant income, they faced threats of lawsuits, defamation, and insults. He lists several individuals and organizations that have supported AESV's findings, including Jean-Pierre Petit, Pierre Guérin, Jean-Claude Bourret, 'Inforespace', 'L.D.L.N.', 'Approche', 'Hypothese Extraterrestre', and the European Committee for Coordination of Ufological Research (CECRU). Petrakis concludes that this unified movement in ufology has caused adversaries to reconsider their positions and abandon further pursuit. He also mentions that in his second book, Miguères selectively used favorable affirmations while omitting inconvenient details, and that Miguères' claim of interacting with a small group in Provence is inaccurate, as he engaged with a larger ufological organization with international sections.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the critical examination of UFO contactee claims, the role of media in disseminating such stories, and the internal debates within the ufological community. The editorial stance is clearly skeptical, prioritizing evidence-based analysis and questioning unsubstantiated narratives. The magazine actively seeks to debunk what it perceives as fabrications and exaggerations, particularly in the case of Jean Miguères, while acknowledging the efforts of other ufologists who share a similar critical approach.

This issue of "Hypothèses EXTRATERRESTRES" from July 1981, titled "2020S ET CIE," features a cover illustration of a figure representing the Institut Mondial des Sciences Avancées. The magazine delves into various aspects of ufology, including critiques of prominent figures, analysis of UFO sighting patterns, and discussions on the scientific approach to studying these phenomena.

Critiques of Ufologists and Organizations

The editorial begins by commending the April 1981 issue of the same magazine for its effort to 'clean house' among ufologists, noting that some 'contactee' cases had reached a level of 'clownery.' The author recounts an encounter with Jimmy Guieu, president of the Institut Mondial des Sciences Avancées, in 1976. Guieu, wearing a pendant, questioned if the author's ideas were mere coincidence, suggesting they stemmed from logical reasoning in fluid mechanics and electromagnetism. The author, a physicist, found this notion of being 'taken in charge by entities from outer space' amusing and refused to accept it, which displeased Guieu. The author implies that many like Guieu exist, and mentions Charles Berlitz as someone who surpasses Guieu in this regard.

A significant portion of the magazine details an expedition in May 1979 to the Bermuda Triangle, organized by Jacques Mayol. The expedition, sponsored by an unnamed entity, involved Charles Berlitz. Berlitz, described as a 'small, round man with a mustache,' showed a photocopy of an echo sounder recording that purportedly showed a 'pyramid.' The expedition aimed to investigate this anomaly. Despite extensive searching and recording with echo sounders, no pyramid was found. Berlitz became seasick during the trip, and the author notes his apparent lack of resilience as a 'man of the field.'

The article questions the validity of the echo sounder data, pointing out the absence of recording markers and suggesting that the data might have been manipulated to preserve Berlitz's 'secret.' The author expresses a desire to ask Berlitz about his recording methods and boat/paper speeds. The author also recounts his experience reading Berlitz's book on the Philadelphia Experiment, criticizing Berlitz's claims about the Navy using magnetic fields to achieve invisibility.

The author criticizes the vagueness of Berlitz's statements, particularly his frequent use of 'may be,' which he sees as a way to avoid definitive claims and imply unsubstantiated theories. He also notes Berlitz's tendency to involve the military, which he believes adds an air of seriousness and protection against criticism.

The magazine also touches upon the GEPAN (Groupe d'Études et de Recherches des Phénomènes Aérospatiaux Non identifiés), stating that it remains silent when attacked by Jimmy Guieu. It praises Alain Esterle and his team for their efforts in defining scientific analysis protocols for UFO cases, emphasizing the thoroughness of their investigations.

UFO Waves and Prediction

A substantial article by J. B. Delair, translated from Italian, focuses on UFO waves and their future predictions. It explains that ufologists began systematically collecting and chronologically mapping UFO reports in the 1950s, revealing periodic 'waves' of activity that have occurred for centuries. The article notes that while many attempts have been made to correlate these waves with celestial or atmospheric phenomena, no satisfactory explanation for their occurrence has been found. The Condon Report concluded that predicting the timing and location of future waves was impossible, as wave occurrences were typically identified only after the fact through accumulated reports.

Delair distinguishes between 'waves' (widespread, cyclical activity) and 'flaps' (intense, localized, irregular activity). He emphasizes that the article will primarily discuss waves. The article points out that the collection and publication of UFO reports are often irregular and variable, depending on mass media and interested organizations, which hinders timely recognition of waves.

Delair discusses the statistical analysis of UFO reports, particularly from the modern era (post-1947). He identifies periods of maximum activity, correlating them with waves. Two cyclical patterns are suggested: a ten-year cycle (type A waves) and a six-year cycle (type B waves). The article notes that type B waves are often associated with landing events and encounters with humanoid creatures.

Crucially, Delair proposes a correlation between UFO waves of type A and the cycle of solar sunspots, which has a periodicity of approximately 11 years. He argues that this correlation, observed since at least 1700, is too consistent to be a mere coincidence and suggests using solar sunspot cycles to predict future UFO waves. Based on this, he predicts type A waves for 1977-1978, 1987-1988, and 1997-1999.

The article also references Nostradamus's prophecy of a 'great and powerful Lord' arriving in 1999, suggesting a potential link to the predicted UFO waves of that period, particularly type B waves which are associated with occupants.

Delair criticizes current 'sky watch' organizations for often choosing unfavorable times for observation, leading to poor results. He advocates for using the proposed wave prediction method to schedule observations more effectively. He calls for international coordination of 'sky watch' efforts, particularly during the summer and autumn months when type A waves are more likely to occur.

Other Content

The magazine includes a cartoon depicting a figure questioning the strangeness of a situation, possibly related to the UFO phenomena discussed. There is also a section titled "Les BLUE HOLES (Trous bleus)" discussing underwater blue holes in the Bahamas, their formation, and the potential for exploration. The author mentions diving in these areas and the richness of marine life.

Another section touches upon a colloquium in Chicago in 1976 organized by Allen Hyneck, which the author found 'assommant' (stunning/boring), noting the influence of parapsychology and the focus on 'bandar logs' (monkeys imitating humans). The author expresses disappointment that the colloquium focused on mundane subjects like Hyneck's dog and family members, rather than scientific inquiry.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue include the critical examination of ufological claims and personalities, the scientific analysis of UFO sighting patterns (specifically waves), and the search for predictive models. The editorial stance appears to favor a more rigorous, scientific approach to ufology, distinguishing it from sensationalism and unsubstantiated claims. There is a clear emphasis on data collection, statistical analysis, and the potential for correlating UFO phenomena with natural cycles. The magazine also highlights the challenges and frustrations faced by researchers in the field, as well as the commercial aspects of ufology.

This special issue of SOBEPS, titled 'OVNI: un phénomène parasolaire ?' (UFO: a parasolar phenomenon?), published in December 1980, presents an in-depth statistical analysis of UFO sightings from 1700 to 1947. The publication, originating from Belgium, aims to stimulate and coordinate the efforts of UFO observation groups and suggests that 1981 could be a decisive year for UFO research.

Avant-propos (Foreword)

The foreword, written by Michel Bougard, President of SOBEPS, highlights the dedication of two researchers who have worked for over four years to produce surprising results based on statistical analysis. It encourages readers not to be deterred by the mathematical aspects of the study and to engage with the findings. The foreword also apologizes for the publication delay, attributing it to the complexity of scientific work and the extensive use of illustrations.

Main Content: UFOs 1700-1947

The core of the issue is a detailed examination of UFO observations over a long historical period, presented through graphs and statistical data. The graphs on pages 1 and 2 illustrate the annual distribution of UFO sightings from 1700 to 1947, and also compare UFO sightings with solar activity (sunspots) from 1850 to 2000. The text discusses potential correlations and influences on UFO phenomena.

Key Findings and Correlations:

• Solar Activity: While the correlation between UFO activity and sunspot numbers is questioned, the study suggests a closer link to electromagnetic and corpuscular phenomena induced by solar eruptions or magnetic transitions. Average periods of solar and UFO activity are noted to be similar, spanning cycles from 11 years down to 28 days.
• Galactic Influences: The text explores the influence of galactic fields on the solar system and Earth. It notes an increase in UFO observations around mid-June when Earth passes closest to the galactic center. The Earth's movement through space is described as helical, with variations in its displacement relative to the galaxy throughout the year, particularly in March and September.
• Climatic Variations: A strong correlation is observed between UFO activity and climatic variations, with positive correlations between cold years and UFO waves in Europe. These climatic shifts are linked to complex overlapping cycles similar to those found in solar activity and UFO occurrences.
• Biological and Physical Sensitivity: The authors posit that inert and living matter, including the human brain, is sensitive to electromagnetic and corpuscular radiation. This sensitivity might explain a significant portion of UFO observations, suggesting that even if the physical reality of UFOs is proven, their origin might be linked to cosmic mechanisms.
• Geomagnetic and Planetary Effects: The study mentions anomalies in geomagnetic activity, such as those observed in March (Piccardi test) and semi-annual variations with peaks in March and September-October. It also touches upon the potential influence of planetary factors, though the role of Mars and the Moon is left undefined.
• Latitude Effect: A latitude effect is noted for UFO observations, with higher frequencies in the Northern Hemisphere, mirroring effects observed in physicochemical tests.
• Theories and Hypotheses: The issue entertains hypotheses about pulsating cosmic origins affecting the solar system, leading to phenomena like animal appearances, UFOs, earthquakes, and volcanic eruptions. It also considers the possibility that UFOs might trigger volcanic eruptions, which in turn cause temperature cooling.

Research Methodology and Future Directions:

The researchers utilized statistical analysis on approximately 10,000 UFO references, employing appropriate computer equipment and the help of volunteer collaborators. They identified new characteristics and unsuspected analogies. The study invites the scientific community to explore original research avenues and suggests that the understanding of UFOs requires looking beyond terrestrial correlations to galactic influences.

Bibliography and Further Reading

The issue includes an extensive bibliography listing numerous books and articles related to UFOs, astronomy, and related scientific fields. It references works by authors such as H.B. Lord, S. Stevens, J. Vallée, E.U. Condon, Ted Bloecher, J. Cree, G.P. Kuiper, D.E. Menzel, R.J. Bray, E. Loughead, H.G. Wells, J. Huxley, G.P. Wells, H.C. Roberts, J. Gribbin, J.W. King, M. Waldeimer, K.D. Wood, and others. A separate section lists "Autres ouvrages consultés par l'auteur" (Other works consulted by the author).

Service Librairie de la SOBEPS

A section details how readers can purchase SOBEPS publications, including titles like "DES SOUCOUPES VOLANTES AUX OVNI," "LA CHRONIQUE DES OVNI," and works by authors like Jean-Claude Bourret, Aimé Michel, Jacques Vallée, and Dr. J. Allen Hynek. Payment details for bank transfers and international postal orders are provided.

UFO Quebec Network

The final pages include contact information for the "RESEAU UFO QUEBEC," listing useful telephone numbers for various regions in Quebec, Canada, along with the postal address for the organization.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring theme throughout this issue is the scientific investigation of UFO phenomena through rigorous statistical analysis and the exploration of potential correlations with astronomical, geophysical, and climatic factors. The editorial stance is one of encouraging serious, coordinated research, moving beyond mere historical critique to uncover the underlying mechanisms of UFO occurrences. The publication emphasizes the potential for significant breakthroughs in ufology, particularly by considering broader cosmic and galactic influences rather than solely terrestrial ones. The authors advocate for a comprehensive approach that includes measurable effects, human observations, and the study of humanoids to understand the physical reality of UFOs.