UFO PRESS - No 24 - (Nov 1986)

Magazine Overview

This issue of UFO PRESS, number 24, dated November 1986, is a periodic magazine dedicated to the study, dissemination, and critique of the UFO phenomenon. It is published by the Comisión de Investigaciones Ufológicas (CIU) in Buenos Aires, Argentina. The cover features a quote from the editorial: "Ufólogos: el trabajo serio debe comenzar" (Ufologists: the serious work must begin), alongside a portrait of Dr. Joseph Allen Hynek.

Editorial: Apagón Ufológico y Difusión: Un Balance

The editorial section, titled "Apagón Ufológico y Difusión: Un Balance" (Ufological Blackout and Diffusion: A Balance), reflects on the current state of ufology, noting a decline in its public diffusion and a general 'retreat' of divulgators. The author observes that this phenomenon is not exclusive to Argentina, with foreign specialized publications ceasing to be published or experiencing significant delays. The editorial suggests that a lack of reader enthusiasm and participation, including a decrease in reporting activities and investigations, has contributed to this situation. It also touches upon the role of the publication itself in maintaining its presence despite these challenges, emphasizing the importance of reader engagement and the need to move beyond mere pastimes towards genuine intellectual debate.

The editorial posits that the decline in UFO reports, particularly after the 1973 global 'wave,' created a 'sociological gap.' It suggests that ufologists, even those who had previously distanced themselves, are returning to the subject to recover lost ground. The piece concludes by advocating for a clear-eyed understanding of the situation, free from confusion or conspiratorial thinking, to move ufology forward.

Articles and Content

The table of contents (sumario) on page 6 lists several articles:

• ¿HUMANOIDES FANTASMA EN PLENA CORDILLERA? (Ghostly Humanoids in the Middle of the Cordillera?)
• CINDACTA: EL REGISTRO DE UNA "FLOTILLA"... (CINDACTA: The Record of a "Flotilla"...)
• EL NUDO GORDIANO... (The Gordian Knot...)
• ¿ESTAN LOS OVNI DISTRIBUIDOS SEGUN POISSON? (Are UFOs Distributed According to Poisson?)
• NOVEDADES SOBRE LA UFOLOGIA ESTADOUNIDENSE (News About US Ufology)
• LOS UFOLOGOS TAMBIEN SE MUEREN (Ufologists Also Die)
• NOUS: UN FANTASMA ZERPEAΝΟ... (NOUS: A Zerpanean Phantom...)

Casuística Nacional: ¿HUMANOIDES FANTASMA EN PLENA CORDILLERA?

Pages 8-10 detail a national case study titled "¿HUMANOIDES FANTASMA EN PLENA CORDILLERA?" by Carlos Daniel FERGUSON, dated February 17, 1981, from Manzano Amargo, Neuquén. The article presents a second, more detailed version of an incident that had been previously reported. According to the report, a UFO landed in the area, and two tall beings descended. They invited locals to board the flying saucer, which had colored lights, before departing. The author, Carlos Daniel Ferguson, is introduced as a new permanent staff member of UFO PRESS. He is described as a publicity illustrator and writer who has collaborated with UFO organizations since 1976. The introduction to the case notes the difficulty of the investigation due to the inaccessible terrain and limited initial information, primarily a sensationalist newspaper clipping. Ferguson expresses gratitude to local authorities and residents for their assistance.

LA RED: New Information Exchange System

Page 7 introduces "LA RED," a new system for exchanging ufological information being planned by CIU. The goal is to facilitate the circulation of news among UFO enthusiasts and groups in Argentina. This system aims to provide equal benefits to all participants. CIU plans to launch a bulletin explaining the system's mechanisms and will also provide a "Manual for the Field Investigator" to help unify survey and study techniques in Argentina. LA RED will also focus on the rapid exchange of opinions among ufologists to improve research methodology.

Editorial Stance and Recurring Themes

This issue of UFO PRESS reflects a concern for the health and seriousness of the ufology field. The editorial strongly advocates for a more rigorous, intellectual approach to ufology, moving beyond mere popular interest or pastime. There is a clear emphasis on the need for continued research, investigation, and critical analysis, as evidenced by the detailed case study and the introduction of the "LA RED" initiative to foster better information exchange and methodology. The magazine positions itself as a platform for serious ufological discussion and research in Argentina, acknowledging past challenges while looking towards future improvements and reader engagement.

Title: UFO PRESS
Issue: 11
Date: Not specified
Publisher: UFO PRESS
Country: Argentina
Language: Spanish

This issue of UFO PRESS focuses on two significant UFO/UAP events: a detailed account of an encounter in Argentina and a report on a large-scale sighting in Brazil.

The Witness and His Environment: The Manzano Amargo Case

The magazine details an encounter experienced by José Fermín Albornoz in Manzano Amargo, Neuquén province, Argentina. This region is located about 526 kilometers northwest of the provincial capital, bordering Chile at an altitude of approximately 3,700 meters in the Andes Cordillera. The article notes that several UFO sightings had occurred in the same region back in 1980, including one witnessed by notable figures like the ex-Intendente of Chos-Malal, Mr. Stanley Izaguirre.

One of the most interesting interviews conducted by the journalist was with Luis Recia, a teacher at School 253 in Manzano Amargo, who is described as a confidant of the local inhabitants, including Albornoz. Recia, who was the first person to hear Albornoz's account, expressed strong conviction in its veracity, stating that "What José narrates is based on a real event, because the people, at least the people from here, generally do not possess an intellect developed enough to imagine such things."

The report emphasizes Albornoz's humble background, his lack of benefit from sharing his story, and his limited cultural exposure, suggesting he is unlikely to fabricate such an experience. Albornoz, who was 13 years old at the time of the event (information he only recently confirmed when seeking his identity document), works as a cattle rancher, is married, has seven children, and has not traveled beyond Neuquén. His account was reportedly corroborated by others who know him well, as well as by the rural police and Gendarmerie. Ex-Intendente Izaguirre affirmed, "You can be fully assured that what Albornoz stated is true."

The investigator notes that Albornoz consistently recounts his story without contradictions and that he willingly accompanied the investigator to the sighting location, a trek of about an hour and a half by horse from Manzano Amargo.

The Facts: The Albornoz Encounter

The incident occurred on the night of February 17, 1981, when José Albornoz and two companions were tending to sheep in a cordilleran area enclosed by a corral. After dinner, they retired to a rudimentary shelter. Around 4 AM on February 18, Albornoz was awakened by a commotion among the animals. He observed a luminous celestial sphere about 20 meters away, estimated to be 2 to 3 meters in circumference and hovering 40 cm above the ground. He called to his companion, who was largely unresponsive. Albornoz reported hearing a strong buzzing sound from above, which he described as making him feel as if the earth were trembling.

Suddenly, two humanoid figures appeared about two meters from the shelter. They were described as being about 1.10 meters tall. They spoke in an incomprehensible language and then disappeared as suddenly as they had appeared. Albornoz recalled feeling intense fear and thinking of his family. He felt his pulse quicken and lost consciousness briefly. Upon recovering, he saw the luminous sphere disappear towards the west, while the animals continued to be agitated.

• Specific Details:
• The luminous sphere emitted a faint heat and did not bifurcate.
• The figures were corpulent despite their short stature, with large heads disproportionate to their bodies and broad shoulders. They remained motionless.
• Albornoz did not clearly discern facial features, possibly due to the figures being backlit. He noted they had "something on their heads, like a helmet."
• The figures wore dark blue, form-fitting suits.
• The buzzing sound was likened to a running motor.
• The entire experience lasted about a minute or less.

The report states that Albornoz's account to the police and the investigator showed no contradictions. The companion, who was reportedly emotionally affected and unwilling to speak, was not interviewed.

Albornoz's Account

This section presents Albornoz's direct narrative, transcribed from the interview. He recounts going to check on his horse late at night, hearing the animals become agitated, and then seeing the light. He describes calling to his companion, who hid under a blanket. He heard the buzzing sound and then the appearance of two figures. He expresses his fear, believing it was the end of the world and that he was not with his family. He describes the beings as small ('chiconcitos'), wearing dark blue suits, and standing close together. He could not see their faces clearly due to fear and trembling. He described the light as beautiful, clear, and bluish. He admits he cannot read and does not know what he saw.

Investigator's Opinion

The investigator believes the case is difficult to invalidate, suggesting that a known phenomenon or a fabricated story are unlikely explanations. The witness's lack of sufficient information to create a fantastic story and the absence of real motivation for fraud are cited. The unusual nature of the details presented prevents a conventional explanation. The investigator notes that Albornoz himself pointed out the lack of physical traces. The case is considered interesting due to the emotional effects on the witness, the unusual behavior of the animals, and the protagonist's good reputation and lack of prior exposure to such information. The investigator emphasizes the importance of rescuing these details in a timely manner.

Comparative Cases

• The article presents a table comparing four cases:
• A: June 19, 1980, "Barrancas", Santa Fe, Argentina. Altitude: 1.10m. Two beings (spontaneous disappearance).
• B: February 18, 1981, "Manzano Amargo", Neuquén, Argentina. Altitude: 1.10m. Two beings (spontaneous disappearance).
• C: October 7, 1973, "Panailla", Tucumán, Argentina. Altitude: 1m. Two beings (spontaneous disappearance).
• D: October 1, 1973, "Las Salinas", Tucumán, Argentina. Altitude: 1m. Two beings (unrecorded disappearance).

These cases, compiled by CEFU (Centro de Estudios de Fenómenos Ufológicos), show similarities in the height of the beings and the nature of their disappearance. The article notes that small-statured figures have been increasingly reported in the last decade, unlike in the 1960s.

CINDACTA: The Registry of a UFO 'Flotilla' in Brazil

This section reports on a significant event in Brazil on May 19, 1980, where 21 unidentified flying objects were detected by radar at various air bases and airports. The Integrated Center for Air Defense and Air Traffic Control (CINDACTA) went on alert, and six combat aircraft (F-5E and Mirage III) were scrambled to intercept the objects. The UFOs were visually confirmed by the pilots, who pursued multicolored lights for over two hours. The incident, though overshadowed by the Mexico World Cup, caused a stir in Brazil. The Minister of Aeronautics, General Octavio Moreira Lima, and the Head of Operations of CINDACTA, Major Ney Siqueiros, held press conferences to address the event, referring to them as "unidentified movements."

Expert Opinions

Several experts offer their views. Antonio Ribera suggests the entities might be "immaterial teleprojections or holograms, products of a technology that escapes us." Professor Oscar Uriondo posits that anthropomorphic beings associated with UFO manifestations sometimes exhibit behavior patterns similar to "phantasmal images."

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The issue consistently explores the theme of close encounters with UAPs and humanoid entities, emphasizing witness testimony and the challenges of empirical verification. The editorial stance appears to favor the serious investigation of such phenomena, presenting detailed case studies and expert opinions without outright dismissal. The comparison of cases across different regions and time periods suggests an effort to identify patterns and commonalities in UFO reports. The inclusion of both an Argentinian and a Brazilian case highlights the prevalence of such events in South America. The magazine also touches upon the role of media and potential misinformation in UFO reporting, as noted in the comparison of cases and the investigator's comments on Albornoz's experience.

This issue of UFO magazine, identified as issue number 20, features a prominent article titled "EL NUDO CORDIANO (o la fantástica historia de los OVNI)" by Thierry Pinvidic, translated by Ruben Omar Morales. The magazine delves into the complex and often controversial subject of Unidentified Flying Objects (UFOs), exploring historical incidents, scientific perspectives, and the challenges of investigating such phenomena.

The Brazilian UFO Incident of May 19, 1986

The issue details a significant UFO event that occurred in Brazil on May 19, 1986. According to reports from CINDACTA, radar screens began registering "unidentified targets" around 8 PM, continuing until past 1 AM on May 20. The President of Petrobrás, Colonel Oziris Silva, and pilot Alcir Pereira were among the first visual witnesses. While attempting to land at the Sao Jose dos Campos airport, they were informed of three UFOs on their route. The pilot described them as approximately 13 intense red lights that did not resemble stars or airplanes and changed position rapidly, with speeds fluctuating between 250 and 1500 km/h.

Simultaneously, three F-5E fighter jets from the Santa Cruz air base in Rio de Janeiro were deployed. Following visual contact, three Mirages armed with missiles were launched from Anapolis air base in Goias. Pilots reported their experiences, with Captain Jordao describing a "white target" changing colors at a distance of 12 miles. Lieutenant Kleber pursued a red light that maintained a distance of 35 miles from his F-5E. Captain Freitas had a particularly sensational experience when thirteen luminous objects surrounded his Mirage III, described as being in groups of six and seven lights. Radar contacts followed his aircraft at a distance of 2 miles, and the objects ascended vertically to 33,000 feet. The Minister of Aeronautics, Moreira Lima, stated that the sky was clear and no other aircraft were present, concluding that there was "no technical explanation."

Historical Context and Scientific Inertia

The article emphasizes that the May 19 incident is not isolated, citing radar detections and interceptions by combat aircraft in various countries, including the USA, USSR, Italy, Spain, Argentina, Chile, Peru, Cuba, Iran, and Indonesia. The Brazilian case is compared to the "Washington invasion" of July 1952, where eight UFOs were detected by radar at Washington National Airport, and F-94 jets were scrambled. These objects disappeared from radar upon approach, and the Air Force attributed the sightings to a "temperature inversion" phenomenon. The author notes that despite official efforts to discredit these events, UFOs continue to be observed.

The issue also touches upon the broader scientific and philosophical aspects of ufology. It discusses the "scientific inertia" in addressing the phenomenon, with scientists often interrogating the possibility of time travel or plasmas rather than accepting the reality of UFOs. The article mentions parapsychological experiences by Jean Pierre Girard in Grenoble and critiques the verification processes, or lack thereof, in scientific research related to these phenomena.

Ufology as a Frontier Science

Thierry Pinvidic's essay, "EL NUDO CORDIANO," explores the nature of UFO phenomena and the challenges of scientific investigation. He posits that ufology lies on the frontier between science and philosophy, heralding a revolution. The author criticizes the tendency of "rationalists" to dismiss UFOs due to their "great emotional significance," citing Carl Sagan. The value of a scientific topic, according to Lunan's law, depends on how often it is discussed, and UFOs have been the subject of passionate debates.

Pinvidic argues that a thorough, serious, and possibly new methodological approach is needed to "think" the UFO problem, as it transcends current understanding. He suggests that the phenomenon has a real, objective content with imaginary, subjective prolongations. The study of UFOs is complex, requiring an analysis that goes beyond physics, astronomy, psychology, or psychiatry. The author advocates for a qualitative analysis of individual incidents and a quantitative analysis of the phenomenon as a whole to demonstrate its statistical coherence. He suggests studying patterns from the perspectives of physical and human sciences.

Challenges and Perspectives

The article highlights the difficulty in studying UFOs due to the mixture of objective and subjective data, making them neither purely rational nor verifiable with current techniques. The traditional "trial and error" method is deemed insufficient. The author suggests that a statistical study could reveal the constants and the "global invariant" of the UFO phenomenon. He also touches upon the idea that the current scientific understanding is limited, and that new phenomena may represent future laws.

Notable Quotes and Editorial Stance

The issue includes a quote from Jean Rostand: "To say absurdities is not serious. What is serious is to say them in the name of principles." Another significant quote, attributed to an unnamed speaker, expresses frustration with rationalists who dismiss UFOs, stating a desire to correct this by encouraging humor and openness of spirit. The editorial stance appears to be one of advocating for a more open-minded and rigorous approach to the study of UFOs, challenging the prevailing scientific skepticism and urging for a deeper investigation into the phenomenon.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

Recurring themes include the historical reluctance of the scientific establishment to engage with UFO phenomena, the comparison of significant UFO incidents across different decades and countries, and the philosophical implications of unexplained aerial phenomena. The magazine advocates for a more empirical and open-minded approach to ufology, suggesting that current scientific paradigms may be insufficient to fully comprehend the complexity of UFO sightings. The editorial stance is critical of dismissive attitudes and calls for a more thorough, evidence-based investigation, acknowledging the potential for UFOs to represent phenomena that challenge our current understanding of physics and reality.

This issue of UFO Magazine, published in 1979, delves into critical perspectives on science, the nature of UFO phenomena, and the reliability of human testimony. The cover boldly questions the credibility of UFO accounts, suggesting that doubting human testimony is the most effective way to maintain peace of mind in the face of unexplained events.

Critique of Scientific Traditionalism

The magazine opens with a strong critique of contemporary science, describing it as "sclerotized." The author argues that original research is immediately subjected to dogmatic criticism, and that much of 20th-century science is built upon 19th-century foundations. The scientist of the 20th century is portrayed as a classifier, a functionary of science operating under the watchful eye of "traditionalists." This group is characterized as a "mafia" that governs science, a situation deemed "very serious."

The Nature of UFO Phenomena and Scientific Progress

The issue challenges the notion that progress is impossible, drawing parallels between historical skepticism towards flight and the current resistance to new ideas in science. It highlights how claims that heavier-than-air flight was impossible were disproven, and how the theoretical limits of the speed of light are being questioned by physicists like Gérald Feirberg with his work on tachyons and the Cerenkov effect. The magazine posits that "some thing" exists, and that ufology represents a revolution that could impact physics and psychology. It asserts that a "demonic truth" is preferable to a "reasonable lie," suggesting that embracing the unknown, even if it challenges our understanding, is more valuable than clinging to comfortable falsehoods.

The Study of UFO Waves and Poisson Distribution

A significant portion of the magazine is dedicated to a detailed analysis of UFO waves, particularly focusing on a study by Ernst Berger (pseudonym for Alexander Keul) originally published in "UFO Phenomena" (UPIAR, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1976). The article "¿ESTAN LOS OVNI DISTRIBUIDOS SEGUN POISSON?" (Are UFOs Distributed According to Poisson?) explores the application of statistical methods to understand these phenomena. Berger's work introduces the concept of using the Poisson distribution, a statistical tool for rare and random events, to analyze UFO sightings.

The study examines a wave of 99 UFO observations in Austria during the autumn of 1954, spanning a 12-week period. The author's analysis, detailed with tables and statistical calculations (including CHI CUADRADO tests), suggests that the observed distribution of UFO reports did not follow a causal pattern. Instead, the "wave" structure was likely a result of significant propaganda amplification through media coverage, rather than an "external directive force."

The article contrasts this with other phenomena, such as traffic accidents or Prussian cavalry soldier deaths from horse kicks, where statistical analysis can help determine causal factors or randomness. It notes that previous attempts to define UFO activity, like the "Orthotenia" or "BAVIC" (a proposed alignment of sightings), have proven unreliable or based on shaky foundations.

The magazine discusses how the number of daily reports during a wave might conform to a Poisson distribution, indicating that the primary characteristic is a widespread observation of usual and random events stimulated by the press and social interaction. This phenomenon is termed a "flap." The probability of an individual seeing a UFO might not change, but more people become alert and report sightings.

However, the article also considers the possibility that if daily reports do not follow Bernoulli processes and are not independent, an "external conductor" might be responsible for the rise and fall of "activity." This could lead to the process being called a "wave," even if the nature of the conductor (natural, psychological, or extraterrestrial) remains undetermined. Further studies could potentially identify such a conductor through significant deviations from the Poisson distribution.

Key Incidents and Case Studies

The issue references the 1954 Austrian UFO wave as a primary case study for statistical analysis. It also mentions a study concerning a proposed alignment of UFO sightings (BAVIC) from September 24, 1954, which was later found to be constructed on "rather shaky foundations," with some points discarded and the remaining ones explainable by chance.

Related Content and Publications

The magazine includes information about an upcoming audiovisual presentation titled "LA INVESTIGACION OVNI EN LA ARGENTINA" (UFO INVESTIGATION IN ARGENTINA) by Alejandro Agostinelli and Rubén Morales, sponsored by C.I.U. and Fundación Alexis Carrell. It also references other publications, including "Le Noeud Gordien, ou la fantastique histoire des OVNI" by Thierry Pinvidic, and articles from "LES EXTRATERRESTRES" and "Boletín Ufológico."

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the critique of scientific dogma and traditionalism, the challenge to conventional explanations of UFO phenomena, and the exploration of statistical methodologies for analyzing such events. The editorial stance appears to be one of critical inquiry, advocating for open-mindedness towards unexplained phenomena while rigorously applying scientific and statistical tools. There is a clear skepticism towards established scientific authorities and a call for a more objective evaluation of evidence, even if it leads to uncomfortable truths.

This issue of UFO PHENOMENA, published by UPIAR in Bologna, Italy, in 1977 (Volume II, No 1), features a significant correction and discussion regarding statistical analyses of UFO sightings. The primary focus is on a rectification by Vicente-Juan Ballester Olmos concerning calculations made by Ernst Berger regarding the "Austrian wave" of UFO sightings in 1954.

Statistical Analysis of the Austrian UFO Wave

The issue opens with Ballester Olmos presenting a Chi-squared test analysis of the Austrian UFO wave. He corrects Berger's calculations, arriving at a significantly higher Chi-squared value (37.77 compared to Berger's 3.1). This higher value, with 3 degrees of freedom, indicates a statistical significance above 99.9%, leading Ballester Olmos to refute the null hypothesis that the observed differences between the theoretical Poisson distribution and the actual data are purely random.

He argues that the Austrian wave, and potentially other similar waves globally, cannot be explained by random processes. Ballester Olmos suggests that such phenomena might be influenced by physical stimuli of an anomalous character or, more speculatively, by some form of "intelligence" within the UFO phenomenon itself.

An additional evaluation of the "peak" period of the Austrian wave (September 16 to October 5, 1954, with 22 cases) also showed no significant deviation from a Poisson distribution with h=1 and x²=1.3625, with a significance level of 3.84, reinforcing the conclusion of randomness for that specific sub-period.

Discussion and Implications

Ballester Olmos poses several questions arising from these results:

a) Statistical descriptions are adequate for the problem and hypothesis testing for registered "wave" data, yielding interesting results.
b) The Austrian wave of 1954 demonstrated a random substructure without causal dependence between reports, suggesting a "flap."
c) All registered "wave" data should be checked similarly to see if the Austrian result is typical for broader structures, questioning the value of the "orchestra piece" analogy for UFO waves if they are random.

He further elaborates that, similar to psychological analyses of large groups not forming a team, many reports do not automatically form a "wave" but a "flap," requiring individual treatment. He criticizes the ufological discipline for its imprecise handling of the concept of "activity."

For local "activity structures," the Poisson distribution offers a way to test the idea of "intelligence" behind observations. A deviation from the Poisson distribution might indicate intelligent activity. However, if the phenomenon aligns with statistics of accidents or earthquakes, the idea of "intelligence" should be discarded.

Ballester Olmos also stresses the importance of examining the validity of his Poisson concept by analyzing UFO report submission processes, considering that 90% of observations remain hidden. This selective reporting might influence the observed Poisson distribution.

Editorial Response: Berger Corrects Olmos

Ernst Berger responds to Ballester Olmos's corrections, acknowledging the scientific discussion initiated. He agrees that an error was overlooked by both Berger and Olmos previously. Berger outlines his conclusions:

a) Contrary to his preliminary conclusions, the Austrian wave data do not follow a random distribution.
b) Statistical descriptions and hypothesis testing for "wave" data yield interesting results that warrant further study.
c) The non-randomness of Berger's "wave" data remains an isolated phenomenon, not suggesting "intelligence" or external directive forces, as no other "wave" has been studied similarly. He dismisses inferring "intelligence" from UFO movement patterns as "magical thinking," comparing it to water whirlwinds and tornadoes, which also show dominant directional patterns without implying intelligence.

d) The discussion between Berger and Olmos leaves the topic open for future research.

References

The issue includes extensive references to works by J. Vallee, A. Michel, D. R. Saunders, J. Taubenheim, E. Kreyszig, E. Berger, M. J. Moroney, M. Guasp, and A. Wegener, among others, supporting the statistical and theoretical discussions.

Encounters: News on US Ufology

Alejandro C. Agostinelli reports on his trip to the United States (July-August) and his findings on the state of ufology there. He attended the "1986 Massachusetts MUFON UFO Forum" in Beverly, Massachusetts, and gathered material from new publications, books, and interviews with prominent ufologists.

He notes that while the attendance at the forum (around 200 people) was modest for the US, the invited ufologists were punctual. He pays tribute to the late J. Allen Hynek, who was seen as the unifying figure of North American ufology.

Key Participants at the Beverly Forum:

• David Jacobs: Professor of History at Temple University and author of "The UFO Controversy in America." He moderated the forum and commented that "as we saw in the Argentine work, we are not the only ones where things are not going marvelously."
• Richard Haines: Doctor of experimental psychology and perception, analyst at NASA's Ames Research Center, and author of "Observing UFOs." He presented a detailed study of the disappearance of pilot Frederick Valentich in 1978, playing a tape of Valentich's final transmission reporting unidentified lights.
• Bruce Maccabee: Physicist and laser specialist, formerly with the US Navy, now working on the Strategic Defense Initiative. He defined himself as "skeptical of skeptics" and criticized detractors of ufology, such as Phillip Klass. Maccabee discussed FUFOR's projects and funding criteria for UFO research, even considering support for CIU projects.
• Philip Imbragno: Professor of Science at Connecticut and former CUFOS researcher, co-author with Hynek.

Agostinelli mentions that Haines was particularly interested in the situation of ufology in Argentina and was impressed by a photograph taken by Captain Hugo Niotti.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the application of rigorous statistical methods to UFO phenomena, challenging purely random explanations and opening the door to discussions about potential underlying intelligence or organized activity. The editorial stance appears to favor scientific scrutiny and data-driven analysis, as evidenced by the detailed statistical corrections and the reporting on academic and professional ufologists' contributions. The issue also highlights the importance of international collaboration and the ongoing debate within the ufological community regarding the nature and interpretation of UFO sightings.

This issue of UFO PRESS, Volume VII, Number 24, dated January-March 1985, is primarily dedicated to the legacy of Dr. J. Allen Hynek, featuring his last report and discussing his passing. The magazine also explores significant UFO cases, the personalities within the ufology community, and the challenges of investigative journalism in this field. The publication itself is undergoing changes, with efforts to relaunch it commercially.

Key Articles and Features

Hynek: The Last Report

The cover story highlights the tributes and mentions surrounding the death of Dr. Joseph Allen Hynek. It announces that the magazine will publish his last report, originally intended for an interview during a trip to the USA. This report, previously featured in the magazine 'OMNI', was translated by ufologist Juan Faílla. In this report, Hynek, aware of his declining health, spoke candidly about ufology, his passion and 'leit-motive'.

The Apro Without Lorenzen

This section reports on the passing of Jim Lorenzen, founder and International Director of APRO, an old ufological organization. Lorenzen had been suffering from a serious illness, similar to Hynek's condition, which had kept him inactive for some time. The APRO Bulletin had ceased publication, but was expected to resume once his wife, Coral Lorenzen, recovered from her grief.

Things Molina Left on the Road

This piece commemorates Enrique Molina, a ufologist and co-founder of FAECE (Federación Argentina de Estudios de la Ciencia Extraterrestre). Despite not having a close relationship with CIU or UFO PRESS, his stories and anecdotes are recounted. FAECE's work was often criticized but acknowledged for its valuable enthusiasts. Molina is remembered for his intellectual honesty and enthusiasm, having left his life behind after attempting to climb a mountain to observe Halley's Comet.

Westchesters Boomerangs and UFO Politics

An extensive section details the 'boomerangs' observations in Westchesters, USA, described as the last great UFO episode in the United States. The author notes the significant controversy and the apparent efforts by government agencies to conceal information. The article touches upon rumors of fraud to cover up illegal flights of North American Air Force planes and collective psychosis induced by a film showing camouflaged aircraft. The author observes a monothematic syndrome among US ufologists, suggesting a lack of substantial cases worth in-depth investigation. The controversy also involved Jerome Clark of 'International UFO Reporter' and J. Allen Hynek, with Clark being a detractor of the Westchester case's validity.

Budd Hopkins and Abductions

Budd Hopkins, an artist and author of 'Missing Time', is presented as a respected investigator of UFO abductions. The author admits a personal subjective opinion of not finding Hopkins likable, despite his recognized work. Hopkins presented his findings on four abductions in Minnesota. The author questions the 'spiritual patron' role Hopkins seemed to adopt with abductees, suggesting it might have invalidated their testimonies by overwhelming them with UFO-related data. Hopkins is also noted as being an adversary of Alvin Lawson, who linked natal traumas with abduction experiences. Hopkins was reportedly annoyed by the author's non-complacent questions about the objectivity of his work and his stance on Lawson's analogies.

Other Interviewees and MUFON UFO Forum Participants

The magazine covers interviews and encounters at the MUFON UFO Forum. Bob Girard, owner of Arcturus Book Service, is highlighted as a knowledgeable participant. Tom Benson, editor of 'The Sixth Quark Journal' and MUFON Director for New Jersey, is also mentioned. The author recounts a brief exchange with Benson about UFO sightings in the Falkland Islands.

Interviews with Willy Smith and Virgilio Sánchez Ocejo

The author recounts an interview with Professor Willy Smith in Kissimmee, Florida. Their discussion focused on the work Smith did with Dr. Hynek on the UNICAT Project. Smith expressed his admiration for Hynek's dedication and the void left by his passing, criticizing the internal power struggles within CUFOS.

In Miami, the author attended a UFO gathering organized by the Latin American community, featuring Virgilio Sánchez Ocejo and a presentation on 'UFO Investigation in Argentina'.

John Keel and Other Encounters in New York

During August in New York, the author met with Antonio Huneeus and Hungarian military officer Colman Vonkeviczky, director of ICUFON. The author also interviewed Harold Salkin, known for managing press for George Adamski, and Timothy Green Beckley, editor of 'UFO Review'. These encounters led to an interview with John Keel, described as a highly interesting and important figure.

Nous: A Phantom Zerpeano Threatens UFO PRESS

This section details the complicated relaunch of the UFO PRESS magazine. It describes an initial plan to distribute a renewed UFO PRESS to newsstands, involving the company EDITORIAL NOUS and its president, Gustavo Mario Fernández. However, the author expresses skepticism about Fernández's commercial abilities and intentions, hinting at potential 'concessions' and a risk of the magazine becoming a 'bad business'. The section suggests that Fernández might be an 'adventurer' and 'irresponsible' individual primarily interested in personal gain.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue include the passing of prominent ufologists like J. Allen Hynek and Jim Lorenzen, the ongoing debate and investigation into UFO phenomena (such as the Westchesters case), the internal politics and dynamics of ufological organizations (CUFOS, MUFON), and the challenges of maintaining journalistic integrity and objectivity in reporting on UFOs. The editorial stance appears critical and analytical, questioning the motives and methods of some figures in the field while acknowledging the importance of dedicated researchers. There's a clear emphasis on investigative journalism and a cautious approach to sensationalism, particularly concerning the commercialization of UFO reporting.

Title: CUADERNOS DE UFOLOGIA
Issue: 26
Publisher: CIU (Comisión de Investigaciones Ufológicas)
Country: SPAIN
Language: SPANISH
Cover Headline: El medio de expresión de la ufología española (The means of expression for Spanish ufology)

This issue of "Cuadernos de Ufologia" delves deeply into the troubled publishing history and financial woes of the UFO magazine "UFO PRESS," as recounted by Alejandro Agostinelli. It also provides subscription information for "UFO PRESS" and details the organizational structure of "Cuadernos de Ufologia."

The Publishing Saga of UFO PRESS

The article meticulously details a series of financial mismanagements and ethical lapses by Gustavo Fernández, the editor of "UFO PRESS." The narrative begins with the preparation of the first issue of a new series in February 1986, involving a redactora, Alejandra Swirsky, and a diagramadora, Flavia Campos. Both were dismissed after a month because they "intended" to charge for their work, and the president of EDITORIAL NOUS eventually dismissed Fernández's services.

By March 1986, the originals for the first issue were ready. Alejandro Agostinelli bore the brunt of the work under difficult conditions and with limited resources, facing a tight deadline that Fernández insisted on meeting without providing any compensation.

When the magazine was finally ready, Fernández, with a smile, stated he had no money and they would have to wait. Four months later, in July of the same year, 2,000 copies of the delayed issue (number 23) of "UFO PRESS" were printed, seemingly with funds provided by Fernández. Agostinelli managed to obtain 300 copies for subscribers.

Fernández then committed to distributing these initial copies and handling sales in kiosks. However, the remaining 1,700 copies never left the printer because Fernández failed to pay the outstanding balance. True to his character, Fernández blamed others and approached Agostinelli not to apologize, but to propose starting a new issue and "beginning again."

This detailed account aims to clarify the circumstances surrounding the attempted "new phase" of "UFO PRESS," driven by the urgency to keep the only Argentine magazine dedicated to the OVNI (UFO) theme alive. The narrative suggests that the situation led to a failure that could have been foreseen by paying attention to previous warnings.

Lessons Learned and Editorial Responsibility

Agostinelli reflects on the experience, stating it taught them that the dissemination of the OVNI topic requires much more careful handling than they had previously practiced. A definitive lesson learned was that among the charlatans who exploit the phenomenon and those who are genuinely interested, there is no difference; the "good" and "bad" ufological merchants are merely the same with a different disguise.

The author also accepts his own responsibility, acknowledging that these events would not have occurred without the initial consent of those involved in "UFO PRESS," particularly himself. He admits to having cultivated initial illusions and believing it might be possible to continue the work under such conditions. He states, "We would have expected this from anyone, less from ourselves."

To salvage what little remains, "UFO PRESS" is returning to its modest approach, aiming to inform its long-standing friends who have consistently supported it.

Subscription Information for UFO PRESS

The magazine provides instructions on how to receive "UFO PRESS." The primary method is "PAYMENT BY RETURN MAIL," where readers can pay the cover price only after receiving the magazine. This method is intended to ensure readers receive their copies promptly. Payment is to be made via postal money order to Alejandro Agostinelli, with the address provided as C.C. 26, Suc. 25, 1425, Buenos Aires.

Subscribers whose periods have not yet expired will continue to receive the magazine until their subscription covers 4 issues (equivalent to an annual subscription). A marked "X" indicates an expired subscription, requiring a new payment for each subsequent issue.

Individuals who do not wish to receive "UFO PRESS" are asked to inform the publishers so their data can be removed from the recipient list. Those interested in free informational bulletins should also indicate this expressly.

Contact and Pricing

Address for correspondence:
ufo press
c.c. 26, suc. 25
1425, Buenos Aires

• Subscription Status:
• "Con el Nº [blank] ha vencido su suscripción" (Your subscription has expired with issue # [blank])
• "Con el Nº 1 vencerá su suscripción" (Your subscription will expire with issue # 1)

• Pricing:
• Price per issue: 2,00 (domestic, including postage)
• Price for foreign orders: 2000 (presumably in local currency, e.g., Argentine Pesos, or a placeholder for a larger amount)

Cuadernos de Ufologia Details

Coordinator: José Ruesga Montiel
Address (C.d.U.): Pol. San Pablo Barrio E, Bloque, 810 - 2º B, 41007 SEVILLA, ESPAÑA.

The back cover features the logo and name of "CIU" (Comisión de Investigaciones Ufológicas), indicating it is the publisher of "Cuadernos de Ufologia."

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The primary theme is the critical examination of ufological publishing and the ethical responsibilities involved. The issue strongly critiques financial mismanagement and the exploitation of public interest in UFOs. It highlights the difficulty in distinguishing genuine researchers from those who profit from the topic, advocating for a more cautious and responsible approach to disseminating information about UFO phenomena. The editorial stance is one of self-reflection and a commitment to providing reliable information to a dedicated readership, despite past setbacks.