UFO PRESS - No 12 - (Jul 1979)

Magazine Overview

Title: UFO PRESS
Issue: 12
Volume: III
Date: July 1979
Publisher: SERVICIO DE INVESTIGACIONES UFOLOGICAS

Editorial

The editorial marks the third anniversary of UFO PRESS, highlighting its commitment to serious and objective reporting on Unidentified Flying Objects (UFOs). The publication aims to fill an information void and has garnered both support and criticism. It claims to have gained recognition from major international ufological organizations, positioning itself as a leading Latin American publication on the subject. The editorial expresses gratitude to readers, collaborators, members of the organization, and foreign colleagues for their support.

Articles and Features

La sorprendente noche de Huaco (The Surprising Night of Huaco)

This article, authored by Dr. Oscar A. Galíndez, details a significant UFO sighting that occurred on the night of December 11-12, 1972, in Huaco, a district of Jáchal, San Juan, Argentina. The report is based on interviews with four witnesses: Hiram José Larcher, Marcelo B. Aballay, Nicasio F. Martino, and Agustín Vignoli. These individuals were on an excursion in the mountainous, desert region.

The Scenario:
The witnesses were staying at an abandoned inn near the Huaco River. The night was clear, with a temperature of around 25°C, excellent visibility, and no wind. The area is described as mountainous with uranium deposits.

The Phenomena:

• A Luminous Triangle (Coherent Light): Around 11:00 PM, the witnesses observed a bright, inverted triangle projected onto a rocky hillside approximately 200 meters away. The light was white, similar to mercury, and the triangle's sides were clearly defined. The affected area of the hill was illuminated with astonishing clarity, without shadows. The phenomenon lasted about four minutes and occurred in complete silence. The witnesses initially considered military exercises as a possible explanation, but noted the area was not used for such purposes.
• A Spherical Light and a Strange Sound Phenomenon: Around 11:30 PM, a light with a spherical appearance, resembling a car headlight, was observed moving slowly up a mountain. It stopped at the mountain's edge, near the cornice road to Jáchal. While observing this light, the witnesses heard a scream that sounded like a woman in pain or terror. They initially hypothesized it was related to a car, but discarded this due to the light's unusual movement, which did not follow the road's curves and appeared to cut across the terrain. The phenomenon disappeared suddenly after about two minutes.
• Dozens of Luminous Spheres: Around 4:55 AM on December 12th, Marcelo B. Aballay was awakened by a wave of heat. He then observed dozens of luminous, slightly ovoid lights, about 4-5 centimeters in diameter, moving at high speed in a zig-zag pattern, seemingly following the contours of the mountains. These spheres moved very close to the ground, some passing just a meter away from Aballay. They moved silently and did not emit any odor. The witnesses felt a strange heaviness and fatigue after the spheres departed.
• A Large Brilliant Sphere: Almost simultaneously with the spheres, a large, brilliant sphere, estimated to be 6-8 meters in diameter, was observed moving from south to north. It was about 150 meters away and 100 meters high, over the Huaco River. It then turned east and moved away. Its luminosity was a soft silver-white, without glare. It had a dark, 'S'-shaped nucleus, described as an 'embryo', with tiny, almost imperceptible bright dots resembling stars.

The article concludes by emphasizing the witnesses' sincerity and the physical reality of the phenomena observed.

Other Articles Mentioned in the Summary:

• LA SORPRENDENTE NOCHE DE HUACO by Dr. Oscar A. Galíndez
• INTERESANTE FOTOGRAFIA DE UN OVNI EN BARILOCHE by Daniel Rojo and Daniel Moreno (CICE - Las Heras)
• ANALISIS DE INCIDENTES DE HUMANOIDES SIN OBSERVACION DE OVNI by Emilio Francisco Caldevilla
• AVISTAJE NOCTURNO EN UNA RUTA BONAERENSE by Víctor Daniel Mamondi
• ATERRIZAJE EN TOLUCA, MEXICO by Fernando Téllez (CEI - Barcelona, España)
• LA OBSERVACION DE SAN CAYETANO by Alejandro Chionetti
• AVISTAJES EN LA UNION SOVIETICA by Vladimir I. Sanarov
• COMENTARIOS BIBLIOGRAFICOS

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently focuses on UFO sightings and related phenomena, emphasizing detailed witness accounts and attempts at objective analysis. The editorial stance is one of serious investigation and a commitment to informing the public about UFOs, positioning itself as a credible source in Latin America. The issue also touches upon the geological context of UFO sightings, particularly in relation to uranium deposits, and explores various types of aerial phenomena, including luminous objects and potential humanoid encounters.

This issue of Revista A.R.P.A. focuses on the detailed investigation of a significant UFO sighting that occurred in Huaco, Argentina, on December 12, 1972. The magazine presents a comprehensive account of the events, including witness testimonies, object descriptions, and related sightings in both Argentina and Chile.

The Huaco Incident: The Great Sphere

The central event described is the appearance of a large, luminous sphere over Huaco. Witnesses, including Vignoli and Larcher, observed the object for approximately 8 minutes. It was described as perfectly round, silent, and moving at a speed estimated between 30 km/h and high speed. The sphere had a dense core that attenuated towards its periphery, and its iridescent lights were visible. It moved silently, without leaving a wake or producing any odor. The object disappeared in the direction of Guandacol, La Rioja. A notable detail is that extending a straight line from the sphere's final orientation leads to the radioactive sands of Cerro El Morado, known as "Los Humeditos."

Subsequent Phenomena: Three Luminous Spheres

Approximately 20 minutes after the large sphere vanished, witnesses observed a new phenomenon: three luminous spheres of decreasing size appeared at high altitude, arranged in a line. One of these spheres accelerated rapidly, overtook the other two, and then positioned itself ahead of them in the same line of flight. These three spheres disappeared in the same direction as the initial large sphere. Their visual size was estimated to be that of a first-magnitude star.

Witness Testimonies from Argentina

The magazine compiles reports from various witnesses in Argentina, corroborating the events in Huaco. These include:

• Tamberías, Calingasta, San Juan (12/12/72): Police personnel observed an object resembling a very white, circular cloud moving at high speed from west to east, emitting iridescent flashes.
• Rodeo, Iglesia, San Juan (12/12/72): Neighbors reported seeing an object shaped like a large, round cloud moving towards the capital city.
• Rivadavia, San Juan (12/12/72): Residents and hospital staff saw a large, round, white cloud with almost violet reflections moving at surprising speed towards the mountains. Police confirmed the sighting, noting the UFO was heading towards the "Serranias de Pie de Palo."

One of the police officers, Hugo Sanchez, described the object as perfectly round, emitting a strong, clear grey light that almost illuminated them. He estimated its diameter to be between 8 and 9 meters and noted it passed about 50 meters above the police station.

• Marquesado, San Juan (12/12/72): Near Regiment 22, people saw a clear grey cloud-like object moving low from southwest to northeast. Its luminosity was described as opaque, and it emitted small, intermittent flashes from its center.
• Trinidad, San Juan (12/12/72): Several individuals reported seeing a rare object emitting a glow towards the east, resembling the moon but not being the moon.

Witness Testimonies from Chile

The issue also includes reports from Chile:

• Pollanco, Maipo, Chile (December 5, 1972): Young students observed a luminous spherical object on a hill about 100 meters away. It resembled a dull pink sphere with a darker circumference inside. It moved from El Volcán to San José and disappeared behind a hill after about 10 minutes.
• San José de Maipo, Chile (December 12, 1972): The same group observed two objects, one larger and one smaller and brighter, moving along the same route as the previous night.
• La Serena, Chile (12/12/72): A luminous phenomenon, described as a bright cloud, was observed. This event coincided with reports from Talca and Baños Campanario on December 13, 1972. Scientist James Richard suggested it might be an "ionized gas cloud."

Specific Phenomena and Characteristics

Coherent Light Projection

A significant aspect of the Huaco phenomenon was the projection of coherent light onto a surface. Unlike previous cases where the light source was visible, in Huaco, the light "stamped" itself onto an area without a visible nexus to the emission point. An analogous case is mentioned from Das Hochfeld (Le Champ du Feu), where a luminous geometric figure resembling a trapezoid was projected onto the ground by three coherent light beams from a UFO.

Strange Noises

The issue also discusses reports of strange sounds associated with UFO phenomena. In Huaco, a harrowing cry, similar to a woman's voice, was heard. The article notes that such sounds have been reported in other cases involving sightings of anthropoid entities. Examples include growls, guttural cries, and sounds described as a "gurgle" or "animal noises."

Luminous Spheres (Foo-Fighters)

The small luminous spheres observed in Huaco are compared to "foo-fighters" or "krauts fireballs" reported by pilots during World War II. These small luminous phenomena are noted for their intelligent behavior, as demonstrated by their ability to avoid collisions, even when flying very close to the ground.

Secondary Effects

The article touches upon common physical and physiological effects associated with UFO encounters, such as sensations of heat and marked drowsiness. These effects are theoretically explained by objective causes (e.g., force fields or microwaves) or subjective causes (e.g., psychological impact on the witness).

Author's Commentary

The author concludes by emphasizing the importance of the Huaco episode due to its unique details. The coherent light projection and the unusual sounds are highlighted as particularly noteworthy. The author suggests that further research into these "strange noises" might benefit from revisiting older studies on mysterious animals and their connection to UFOs.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently focuses on detailed accounts of UFO sightings, emphasizing witness testimonies and seeking to analyze the phenomena through scientific and investigative lenses. The editorial stance appears to be one of open inquiry, presenting evidence and theories without definitive conclusions, encouraging further research and analysis from readers. The recurring themes include luminous aerial objects, unusual sounds, and the physical and psychological effects on witnesses, all presented within the context of the broader UFO phenomenon.

This issue of 'Revista de Ufología' (Ufology Magazine), issue 21, focuses on UFO phenomena in Argentina, with a strong emphasis on photographic evidence, statistical analysis, and the potential connection between UFOs and humanoids. The content spans several articles, including a detailed photographic analysis of a UFO sighting in Bariloche and a statistical study on humanoid encounters.

Article: 'Interesante fotografía de un OVNI en Bariloche'

This article, authored by Daniel Rojo and Daniel Moreno of the 'Grupo C.I.C.E. Las Heras', presents a photographic case from Bariloche, Argentina. The photograph was taken by Dr. Sebastián José Tardá, a 49-year-old pathologist and Director of the Central Hospital of Mendoza, in December 1968. Dr. Tardá and his group of students were on a boat trip on Lake Nahuel Huapi near Puerto Blest when the photograph was taken around 1:30 AM, with the sun at their backs. Notably, none of the people on board observed the UFO at the time of the photograph; it only became apparent upon development. The photograph was taken with a Leica 3G camera using a 50mm lens, focused at infinity, with an aperture of f:11 to f:16, and a shutter speed of 1/125 second on a 35mm color slide film (Erutuz CT 19). The initial assumption was that the object in the photograph was a defect, leading to the camera and film being sent to Perutz in Germany for analysis, which ruled out any photographic flaws. Copies of the transparency were sent to NASA, which acknowledged receipt but provided no further information. The CICE (CIRCULO DE INVESTIGACION CIENTIFICO-ESPACIAL) became aware of the photograph through a small group of acquaintances. A photographic analysis was conducted by professionals Ernesto A. Crazi and Rosendo O. Ruiz, who confirmed that the image was not a result of a laboratory trick, development error, emulsion fault, optical reflection, or a known object like a balloon, airplane, or bird. They concluded that the object appeared to occupy a space at a certain distance from the camera. Sr. Rosendo Ruiz suggested the object might have changed position within the 1/125 second exposure, appearing in two places. The article then proceeds to calculate the dimensions and speed of the UFO. Based on the resolution of the photograph and an estimated distance of approximately 300 meters from the camera to the UFO, the object's length (A) was calculated to be 10 meters, and its width (B) was estimated at 1.33 meters. The speed was calculated based on the apparent movement within the exposure time. Two trajectory segments were analyzed, resulting in estimated average speeds of 2100 km/h (Vm1) and 3300 km/h (Vm2). The article concludes that these speeds, especially if maintained, would explain why the object was not visible to the witnesses. It also speculates that the object's movement was not due to natural inertia but controlled by an unnatural, possibly intelligent system. The possibility of the object's luminosity being outside the visible spectrum for the human eye is also considered.

Article: 'Análisis estadístico de los incidentes de humanoides sin percepción de OVNI' (Statistical Analysis of Humanoid Incidents Without UFO Perception)

This article, authored by Emilio Francisco Caldevilla, explores the relationship between UFOs and humanoid entities. It presents two opposing viewpoints among researchers: one that denies any connection and attributes these entities to parapsychological or folkloric phenomena, and another that believes there is a link between these 'appearances' and UFOs. The author's aim is not to reconcile these views but to determine if a connection exists by analyzing Argentine cases of entities not associated with UFOs. The study is based on 21 such cases, compiled from a well-documented work on UFO landings in Argentina. The author emphasizes that the investigation into 'occupants' has shifted, with humanoid observations no longer being solely attributed to hallucinations or 'contactees.' The sheer volume of testimonies suggests the presence of intelligent beings or an intelligence controlling the phenomena. The article details the methodology, which involves analyzing temporal and geographical location data from the selected cases. It also references a catalog of Type I sightings in Argentina for further information.

Article: 'Características de la gran esfera (fenómeno "D")'

This section describes a large spherical UFO (phenomenon 'D') observed in Huaco, Argentina. Its characteristics include iridescent lights (1), bright pinkish-yellow points resembling stars (2), a dark nucleus shaped like an 'S' (3), and transparency towards the edges (4). The sphere was estimated to be 6 to 8 meters in diameter. The article discusses how its size and characteristics help dismiss the possibility of it being a natural plasmatic manifestation. It also rules out the hypothesis of a sounding balloon due to its spheroidal shape, luminosity, and transparency. The phenomenon is categorized as 'unknown.' The appearance of this large sphere was preceded and followed by other inexplicable luminous phenomena, including coherent light in the mountains, a luminous focus with a cry, fast-moving bright spheres near the ground, and luminous formations. Witnesses also reported secondary effects like heat and fatigue. The phenomenon was observed over a six-hour period in an Argentine-Chilean region.

Article: '6.- Las esferas de paso veloz.' (6.- Fast-moving spheres.)

This section discusses fast-moving spheres observed in Huaco, Argentina, which are distinguished from meteoritic phenomena by several characteristics. Their flight was silent and swift, traversing the sky in about 5 seconds at a great height. Witnesses dismissed the meteoritic possibility because the spheres left no trails, their speed, while high, was not as extreme as a meteor, they appeared self-propelled rather than in free fall, and their flight was horizontal, not oblique or vertical. The maneuver of one sphere overtaking another was noted.

Article: '7.- Fuentes acuíferas y radiactivas.' (7.- Aquifer and radioactive sources.)

This section explores potential natural correlations with the observed phenomena in Huaco. It identifies four natural elements: a water source (Río Huaco) and three radioactive sources (uranium mines at 'Los señores Saso,' Gualampi, and Cerro 'El Morado'). Small spheres were observed zig-zagging over the Río Huaco, while the large sphere was seen about 100 meters above it. The article highlights the intriguing geometric relationship where the vertices of a luminous triangle formed by phenomenon 'A' coincide with the three main uranium deposits. The phenomenon 'B' moved towards the 'Los señores Saso' uranium mines, and spheres (phenomenon 'C') were seen originating from the west, covering an area including these mines. The luminous envelope of the spheres was described as 'uranium green.' The large sphere ('D') disappeared heading north, towards the radioactive sands of Cerro 'El Morado,' approximately 14 km away. Phenomenon 'F' also moved north, parallel to the large sphere but separated by about 700 meters, also leading towards the radioactive sands.

VI. CONCLUSION.

The article concludes that the presented phenomena are difficult to identify with known occurrences. The Huaco manifestations are considered among the most significant UFO episodes in Argentina due to the variety of unknown phenomena, their extension to neighboring regions, and the quality of the observers. The statistical analysis of humanoid encounters suggests a potential link to UFOs, indicating intelligent control or occupants.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently explores UFO sightings, photographic evidence, and the analysis of unexplained phenomena. There's a clear interest in connecting these sightings to potential intelligent origins, whether extraterrestrial or otherwise. The editorial stance appears to favor rigorous investigation, statistical analysis, and the presentation of detailed case studies, while acknowledging the difficulty in definitively identifying the nature of these phenomena. The articles suggest a belief that UFOs are not mere natural occurrences but involve some form of controlled intelligence. The connection between UFOs and humanoids is a recurring theme, with the magazine exploring the possibility of a link through statistical analysis.

This issue of OVNI magazine, identified as Number 2 and published in 1979, delves into the phenomenon of 'solitary entities' in Argentina. The cover headline, 'Avistaje nocturno en una ruta bonaerense' (Nocturnal sighting on an Argentine highway), introduces a detailed case study by Víctor D. Mamondi.

Study of Solitary Entities and UAP Manifestations

The magazine presents a comprehensive analysis of entities not associated with OVNI (Unidentified Flying Objects), focusing on Argentine cases. The study's methodology involved a global and particular analysis of each piece of information, highlighting coincidences and dissimilarities with other OVNI manifestations, particularly concerning the behavior of the entities, which appear to follow a distinct pattern.

Catalog of Incidents

A detailed chronological catalog of 21 incidents is provided, spanning from October 1, 1960, to November 17, 1969. Each entry includes the date, time (if available), location (city/region and province), and sometimes specific details like the number of witnesses or the time of day (night or solar light). The locations span various provinces across Argentina, including Salta, Entre Ríos, Chaco, Corrientes, Santa Fe, Santiago del Estero, Mendoza, Buenos Aires, and Jujuy.

Characteristics of the Work

The study restricts itself to a global analysis of information, detailing the categories for study and comparing them with other OVNI manifestations. It notes dissimilarities, especially in the entities' behavior, suggesting a particular pattern. The evaluation of the informative material was previously conducted by Dr. Galíndez and Professor Oscar Uriondo. The focus on witnesses is limited to aspects like the number of witnesses, their activity during the sighting, and their reaction to the anomalous event.

Breakdown of Temporal Location Data

Given the limited number of cases for extensive analysis, the issue provides a breakdown of classic data to compare with OVNI phenomenon manifestations.

#### Hourly Distribution:

The data indicates that solitary entities predominantly manifest during nighttime hours, similar to the hourly distribution of OVNI manifestations.

#### Distribution by Day of the Week:

The distribution shows a marked similarity to studies of OVNI landings with occupants and Type I sightings, with a peak in activity on Mondays and Tuesdays.

#### Distribution by Month of the Year:

An analogous result to the monthly activity frequency of UFOs is observed, with a peak in July and lower activity in February, March, and April.

Witness Data

The study extracts data on the quantity, activity, and reaction of witnesses. The quantity of witnesses in solitary entity observations is comparable to studies on OVNI landings with occupants. Witness activities at the time of sightings are common and align with their daily work or social routines. The report details various activities, including being at home, driving, working, and resting. The witnesses' elevated degree of responsibility or the situations they were in at the time of the entity's manifestation are highlighted as factors supporting the veracity of their accounts.

#### Witness Reactions:

Witness reactions are directly correlated with the number of witnesses, their relationships, and their activities. Reactions range from attempts to flee and investigate to paralysis, screaming, and even attacking the entity. The report notes that reactions are generally normal, with some cases possibly influenced by the responsibility associated with the incident. For example, in case 03, adults felt braver and decided to investigate, while in case 05, the head of the family attacked the visitor out of concern for his family's safety. The paralysis experienced by some witnesses is described as disconcerting, as its cause (natural reaction or phenomenon-induced) is undetermined.

Data on the Entities

This section details the morphology, equipment/attire, and behavior of the entities observed. The study acknowledges the difficulty in establishing definitive typologies due to the vastness of ufo-logical fauna and potential observational limitations. However, similarities with descriptions of OVNI occupants have been identified.

#### Morphology:

Descriptions vary, including entities of great height (up to 3 meters), some with a single eye, others with three eyes, and some described as human-like with melon-shaped heads or large eyes. Some are described as luminous, others as having dark or metallic attire, and some as remotely human-like, resembling robots. There are also descriptions of 'giants' and 'dwarfs'.

#### Equipment and Attire:

Attire ranges from luminous tunics and metallic suits to dark, shiny fabrics, and black, tight-fitting garments. Some entities wore helmets or visors, and carried circular screens or devices resembling 'lanterns' for illumination. One entity was noted to have a 'baton'.

#### Behavior:

The behavior of these entities differs from that of typical OVNI occupants. They show a manifest interest in witnesses, often approaching them. Behaviors described include aggression (attacking women and children), absurd actions (tearing up a newspaper), evasiveness, and attempts to capture children. Some entities emitted guttural sounds or spoke unintelligibly. Others were observed interacting with each other or demonstrating objects to witnesses.

#### Comparative Analysis of Entities:

This section compares the observed entities with descriptions from OVNI occupant cases. Similarities are noted in descriptions of tall beings with a single eye, and in the attire of entities wearing full suits. The study highlights that while many similarities exist, they are not sufficient to definitively link solitary entities with OVNI occupants.

#### Behavior Comparison:

The behavior of the entities is contrasted with the 'accustomed' indifference of OVNI occupants. The entities show interest in observers (cases 04, 05, 08, 09, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20), exhibit aggressive attitudes (cases 01, 02, 10), engage in absurd behavior (cases 03, 11, 15), and display evasive conduct (cases 16, 18).

Contemporaneity with OVNI Manifestations

This section draws a parallel between the observations of solitary entities and OVNI phenomena, seeking antecedents of cases registered in nearby locations and dates. Some cases show temporal and spatial coincidence with OVNI sightings, particularly during OVNI waves in Argentina. Other cases lack such correlation.

Versions and Other Coincidences

This part details other versions and additional data, including potential electromagnetic effects on a witness's motorcycle and observations of OVNI descents. A footprint with four large toes was found, and a strong glow was reported near the sighting site.

Final Notes

The study concludes that while the information is sometimes scarce, the analysis of cases suggests a possible link between solitary entities and OVNI manifestations, particularly when comparing activity distributions and OVNI waves. However, the authors emphasize that the goal was not to find irrefutable proof, acknowledging the complexity of the phenomenon of Unidentified Flying Objects.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the detailed analysis of specific UAP cases, the meticulous cataloging of data (dates, times, locations), the examination of witness testimony and reactions, and the comparative study of different types of aerial phenomena and entities. The editorial stance appears to be one of rigorous, data-driven investigation, aiming to identify patterns and potential connections within the vast field of ufology, while maintaining a cautious approach to definitive conclusions. The publication also includes a section on 'Collaborations', providing guidelines for submitting future articles to UFO PRESS, indicating a commitment to fostering research and publication within the ufological community.

This issue of UFO PRESS, identified by issue number 13, focuses on UFO sightings and related phenomena from various locations, primarily in the 1970s. The magazine features articles detailing specific encounters, witness testimonies, and analyses of the events. The cover headline poses the question, "OVNIS ¿UNA NUEVA FORMA DE RELIGION ?" (UFOs: A New Form of Religion?).

Article: Aterrizaje en Toluca, México

This article, by Fernando Téllez (CEI-Barcelona), details a Close Encounter of the Second Kind that occurred on March 26, 1978, near Toluca, Mexico. Four young men—Arturo Bernal, Alfredo Reynoso, Salvador Serrano, and José Brito Ayar—were in their car when a dust storm (tolvanera) hit the city. While observing the storm, they noticed a red glow behind a small hill. The object emerged, described as having a chrome hemisphere with a red dome, emitting light and fire from its base. It had large blue lines, possibly windows, and two large legs, though it appeared to be floating. The object hovered for about five minutes, emitting a "motor-like" sound, and then ascended rapidly. After the object left, the area where it was observed was found to be hot, with two large burned circular areas on the ground, approximately 70 cm apart. Samples of soil and small copper wires were collected. The witnesses described the object as being the size of a passenger bus. The article also mentions a separate witness, Francisco García, an agricultural engineer, who observed a similar intense glow from a hill near "La Pedrera" and used a theodolite to observe a white and red object resembling a spinning top.

Article: La observación de San Cayetano

Authored by Alejandro Chionetti, this article recounts the experience of Luis Alberto Parravichini, a mechanic, on the night of September 4, 1978, in San Cayetano, Argentina. Parravichini observed a luminous, ovoid object with indistinct, milky-white edges, described as having a moderate intensity, less than a fluorescent tube. The object was seen hovering near railroad buildings. The sighting occurred during a partial power outage in the area. Parravichini estimated the object's size to be between 30 to 40 meters long. He later returned to the site and observed the object again, noting it ascended rapidly, at a speed superior to a passenger jet. The article estimates the object's dimensions to be approximately 25 meters long by 15 meters wide. It also notes that the power outage was not due to any known fault. The article suggests the object's shape tended towards an ellipsoid of revolution. It also mentions other sightings in the Necochea area during August and September 1978.

Article: Avistajes en la Unión Soviética

Written by V.I. Saranov, this article details a UFO sighting in Petrozavodsk, Karelia, USSR, on September 20, 1977. The phenomenon was described as a large, luminous "star" that exploded brightly over the horizon, emitting pulsating light beams. It moved towards Petrozavodsk and deployed like a "medusa" (jellyfish), casting numerous fine light beams. The event lasted 10-12 minutes. A semicircular, red and white opening appeared within the object. The article cites reports from the newspaper "Sotsialisticheskaya Industriya" and the agency Tass, quoting V. Krat, head of the Central Astronomical Observatory, who confirmed observations by astronomers in Pulkovo. The article also references a report from the "National Enquirer" stating that the Soviet government had secretly requested a scientific investigation. Aleksander Kasantsev, a science fiction writer, reported that the light beams had caused holes in window panes. Physicist Vladimir Azhazha described the object as descending towards a port and hovering over a 465-foot-long boat, estimating the UFO's diameter to be about 350 feet (116 meters). A smaller object reportedly emerged from the larger one and descended towards the water. The article notes that witnesses behaved strangely afterward, some becoming hysterical. Yu. Gromov confirmed that a small part detached from the object, which then transformed from a semicircle into a red, bright ellipse with white borders, moving towards a cloud. The article concludes by mentioning that the investigation was reportedly suppressed.

Other Sections

This issue also includes a section titled "OVNIS ¿UNA NUEVA FORMA DE RELIGION ?" by Emilio Francisco Caldevilla, and brief reports on sightings in Mendoza, the Antarctic, Puerto Belgrano, and Golfo San Jorge. There is also a mention of a "COMENTARIOS BIBLIOGRAFICOS" (Bibliographic Comments) section and a new "BOLSA DE PEDIDOS" (Order Form) section to be incorporated in the next issue.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are UFO sightings, their physical characteristics, witness testimonies, potential physical traces, and the impact of these phenomena on witnesses and the environment. The editorial stance appears to be one of serious investigation and reporting of UFO phenomena, presenting detailed accounts and analyses from various sources, including official reports and witness interviews. The magazine aims to document and explore these unexplained events without outright dismissal, as indicated by the analysis of the Toluca case where the phenomenon was deemed "truly unidentified."

This issue of Revista UFO PRESS, identified by its page number 51, focuses heavily on the Petrozavodsk UFO incident that occurred on the night of September 19/20, 1977. The magazine presents a detailed account of the event, drawing from various sources and expert opinions, while also reviewing several significant books on the UFO phenomenon.

The Petrozavodsk UFO Incident

The main article details the observation of a luminous object over Petrozavodsk. The object was first seen as a luminous ball that extended into a "medusa" shape with eight petal-like rays descending downwards. Many inhabitants reported feeling anxiety and fear. Two smaller, torch-like objects detached from the main craft and flew at a high altitude. A local pilot reported being followed by a UFO, describing it as a fiery ball with a black tail. The main object descended towards a ship, estimated to be 105 meters in diameter, and then moved over Lake Onega. A smaller object detached from the main craft and submerged into the water, after which the main UFO disappeared into the clouds.

Further details emerge from the report, including a mention of a Russian Academy of Sciences report titled "Are We Alone in the Cosmos? Intelligence in the Cosmos: Facts and Hypotheses" by Vladimir G. Azhazha. The article notes that the smaller object did not submerge in the port but in Lake Onega. Azhazha considered the object a real UFO, possibly occupied by intelligent beings or an energy field.

Aleksei V. Zolotov, a geophysicist and head of the 1958 Tunguska expedition, described the object as a "typical flying saucer," stating that the available reports left no doubt about its authenticity.

Félix Yu.Zigel, an astronomer and head of the UFO Investigation Group at the Moscow Aviation Institute, agreed that the object behaved like a UFO.

Corroborating and Related Observations

The magazine also presents information from Helsinki, where a bright fiery ball was observed over the airport on September 20th at 03:02, visible both visually and via radar. This observation is contrasted with the Petrozavodsk sighting, noting a slight time discrepancy.

Another event mentioned is a "fugitive" object observed by astronomers at Pulkovo, which exploded in the airspace of Leningrad. Evidence for this was provided by pilots of an aircraft that was being followed by a UFO.

Physical Evidence and Further Incidents

Physical evidence is discussed, including reports that some houses in Petrozavodsk had double-paned windows perforated with holes measuring 50 to 70 mm in diameter. These holes, if caused by the UFO, suggest an altitude of 14 km at the time of emission. One such glass pane was sent to Moscow for analysis.

The article notes that after the September 20th incident, UFOs were observed repeatedly in the Petrozavodsk region, two or three times a month, though these subsequent sightings were less dramatic.

Book Reviews

This issue includes several book reviews:

• EL INFORME HYNEK by Dr. J. Allen Hynek: Reviewed as an essential text for anyone interested in UFOs, covering incidents from the Project Blue Book archives. The review notes the omission of Chapter 11, "The Air Force Numbers Game," from the Spanish edition, which the reviewer considers important for its statistical analysis of the USAF's investigative project.
• EL NUEVO DESAFIO DE LOS OVNIS by Jean Claude Bourret: Praised as one of the most important books on UFOs published in Spanish, featuring contributions from French scientists like Dr. Claude Poher, Dr. Pierre Guérin, Jean-Pierre Petit, and Maurice Viton. It is recommended for its scientific approach and lack of sensationalism.
• ARGENTINA, RUTA DE OVNIS by various authors: Described as a book by journalists that, despite lacking deep prior knowledge, attempts to treat the subject with seriousness and objectivity. It is considered to add little new information to the topic.
• EL ESCANDALO DEL OVNI by Ray Stanford: Discusses the 1964 Socorro, New Mexico, UFO landing incident. While valuable, the reviewer notes that the author sometimes indulges in sensationalism, particularly in the Spanish edition's final chapter, "Multiple Filtrations in the Pentagon's Backstage."

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently emphasizes the importance of scientific investigation into UFO phenomena, presenting expert opinions and detailed case studies. There is a clear stance against sensationalism, favoring serious analysis and factual reporting. The editorial team appears dedicated to providing comprehensive information on UFOs, including reviews of key literature in the field. The Petrozavodsk incident is presented as a pivotal event that may have contributed to a "second renaissance" of UFO studies in the country.