UFO-Nytt - 2006 No 6

Magazine Overview

Title: UFO-NYTT
Issue: No. 6
Year: 2006
Publisher: NETI (Norwegian Organization for the Study of Extraterrestrial Intelligence)
Language: Norwegian

This issue of UFO-NYTT, dated 2006, presents a collection of articles and news items related to UFO phenomena, with a particular focus on historical cases and ongoing research in Norway.

Editor's Note

The editor-in-chief, Kjell Arne Høviskeland, welcomes feedback from members regarding the content of the newsletters, asking for suggestions, shared stories, and general comments. He provides his email address ([email protected]) and postal address for correspondence, expressing a goal to continuously improve the newsletter.

Hessdalen Visit

The newsletter includes a summary from Terje Toftenes about a trip to Hessdalen, an area known for unexplained phenomena. The visit included a presentation by Erling Strand, a pioneer researcher of the Hessdalen project. Strand presented concise facts and data gathered over nearly 20 years of research, including photographic and measured evidence of 'lights,' as well as registered unidentified objects of various shapes and speeds up to 30,000 km/h. Despite the extensive data, Strand refrains from drawing conclusions, which is noted as a reason for his respected status in the field. The frequency of phenomena in Hessdalen has decreased significantly from about 20 times a week in the 1980s to about 20 times a year currently, though a group of Italian researchers reportedly had a clear registration the week before the visit.

The article details the research station, a semi-container equipped with radar, magnetometers, spectrographic equipment, weather instruments, and various cameras, all managed by powerful computers that transmit data to Østfold College and the internet. The data is intended to be publicly accessible. The author recounts an "UFO safari" in the mountains, enjoying the scenery and experiencing a spectacular display of the Northern Lights, though no unexplained phenomena were observed during that particular night.

The Spitsbergen Case 1952

A significant portion of the magazine is dedicated to an in-depth article by Ole Jonny Brænne about the "Spitsbergen Case 1952." The article revisits the persistent rumors of a crashed "flying saucer" on Svalbard, which was allegedly discovered by Norwegian pilots, transported to Narvik, and then to the USA for examination. The investigation reportedly revealed the object was made of an unknown metal alloy of non-terrestrial origin.

The article traces the case's development, starting with its first known mention in the German newspaper Saarbrücker Zeitung on June 28, 1952. This report described a "silver-shining disc with a plexiglass dome and 46 nozzles" found on Spitsbergen. Norwegian jet fighters experienced communication and radar disruptions as they approached the object. The wreckage, described as a circular metallic disc about 40-50 meters in diameter, was found partially buried in snow and ice. It was later transported by seaplanes to Narvik for further study.

Further details emerge from various sources, including a statement from Norwegian rocket expert Dr. Norsel, who identified the object as a "flying saucer" and explained the radio disruptions as being caused by an undamaged homing device emitting a unique frequency. The object was described as unmanned, cone-shaped, 48.88 meters in diameter, made of an unknown metal alloy, and equipped with 46 automatic nozzles. Russian markings were noted on its instruments. Its operational radius was estimated at over 30,000 km, and its flight altitude above 160 km. German V-weapon designer Riedel suggested it was a V-7 type craft.

The article notes that the case was also published in the Berliner Volksblatt and discussed in the journal Der Flieger, with Dr. Waldemar Beck's article significantly contributing to its spread. The case even found its way into CIA archives. Swedish newspapers Aftontidningen and Göteborgs-Tidningen reported that the Swedish Defense Staff denied knowledge of the case. Donald E. Keyhoe's 1953 book "Flying Saucers From Outer Space" was the first book to mention the Spitsbergen case.

Later reports, including one from Hessische Nachrichten in July 1954, stated that a Norwegian Air Force commission, led by Colonel Gernod Darnhyl, was preparing to release a report on material samples from a crashed "flying saucer." Darnhyl emphasized that the object was not of any nation on Earth and was made of a material unknown to experts, possibly processed with unknown physical and chemical methods. He indicated that the commission would consult with US and British specialists before releasing its findings, warning against secrecy that could cause panic.

Lieutenants Brobs and Tyllensen, assigned as special observers of polar areas, believe that UFOs may use the North Pole region as a base, landing during snowstorms and bad weather. They described observing objects performing a rapid rotation or "lightning flash" maneuver upon landing and takeoff, which obscured their details. Colonel Darnhyl expressed confidence that a solution to the technical questions surrounding the case would be found within 12 months, potentially advancing the understanding of the UFO problem. Material samples were being analyzed using techniques like "atom crushing" due to their resistance to extreme temperatures and chemical treatments. Reports of TV reception interference in Sweden when UFOs were sighted were also noted as a potential lead to understanding the craft's communication systems.

Further details emerge regarding the object's origin, with the Uruguayan newspaper "El Nacional" reporting in Montevideo on Hans Larsen Løberg's discovery of a flying saucer on Heligoland, which it claimed was the same object reported crashed in Spitsbergen in 1952. Løberg, a physicist who had won a prize in physics in Hungary, denied any Russian inscription on the object. He described its dimensions (91 feet in diameter, 70 feet thick at the center) and its control room with numerous buttons. The craft reportedly moved using magnetic forces and had no visible engines, seams, or rivets. Its surface was shiny and transparent. Inside, they found water three times heavier than normal, pills, a radio, and books with an unknown script. Seven charred bodies, estimated to be men aged 25-30 and about 1.65m tall, were found inside.

Dr. Hans Larsen Løberg also spoke of an unknown weapon, a "ray gun" using magnetic waves, which he believed explained mysterious incidents in the US, such as shattered glass windows. He suggested the Mantell pilot's crash was due to being shot down by this weapon. The crash of the flying saucer was attributed to the effects of the American hydrogen bomb explosion, which incinerated the crew despite the craft's material resisting the heat.

Legal Aid for Alleged Abductees

An article reports on German lawyer Jens Lorek, who is seeking to increase his client base by offering legal assistance to individuals who claim to have been abducted by aliens. Lorek believes these individuals are entitled to compensation from the German state. He notes the demand for such legal help but also the public's fear of ridicule. While Lorek has not yet won any cases in this new field, he sees potential, citing numerous annual reports of alien abductions. He intends to use German law to help his future clients.

NETI Recommendations

NETI recommends the DVD "KORNSIRKLER" (Crop Circles) – A business card from the unknown, produced and commented on by Terje Toftenes, released in 2005, with a duration of 75 minutes. It is described as the first Nordic film about the crop circle phenomenon. The film won an award abroad.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently focuses on UFO sightings, investigations, and the scientific study of unexplained aerial phenomena, particularly within Norway. It presents historical cases like the Spitsbergen incident alongside contemporary research efforts in Hessdalen. The editorial stance appears to be one of serious inquiry into these phenomena, encouraging member participation and disseminating information through its newsletter and website. There is an underlying theme of promoting transparency in research and a critical examination of evidence, while also acknowledging the more speculative aspects, such as legal claims for alien abduction.

Title: UFO-Nytt
Issue: 1991
Publisher: NETI
Country: Norway
Language: Norwegian

This issue of UFO-Nytt, published by NETI, focuses on debunking persistent UFO stories, particularly the Spitsbergen and Helgoland crash incidents. The main cover headline boldly states that these cases are 'pure fabrication'. The magazine delves into the history of these claims, tracing their origins and the various individuals and publications that have propagated them.

The Spitsbergen and Helgoland UFO Crash Narratives

The article begins by addressing the confusion surrounding two distinct stories that have been blended: one about a flying saucer crashing on the German island of Helgoland in the North Sea, and another related to an incident on Spitsbergen. The Helgoland story, first published in the sensationalist magazine 'Sir!' in September 1954, allegedly involved a UFO forced down by atmospheric conditions caused by hydrogen bomb explosions. It mentions a 'Dr. Hans Larsen Løberg', a former Norwegian scientist, who supposedly reported unusual discoveries, including that the crashed saucer was equipped with weapons capable of shattering glass with magnetic rays. The report also speaks of seven burnt bodies found near the craft.

Another key incident discussed is the alleged crash on Spitsbergen. This story has circulated for decades, with various accounts and alleged investigations. The article notes that the Norwegian Ministry of Defence has no knowledge of such an event.

Debunking the Claims

The magazine systematically dismantles these narratives. It highlights the lack of credible evidence and the inconsistencies in the various reports. For instance, investigations into the existence of 'Dr. Hans Larsen Løberg' in Norway yielded no results, suggesting he is a fictional character. Similarly, the German authorities and the inhabitants of Helgoland had no knowledge of the alleged crash.

The article points out that the 'Sir!' article, attributed to E.W. Grenfell, likely originated from sensationalist reporting. It also addresses the claims of shattered car windows in American cities, suggesting they were misleadingly linked to the UFO story. The Mantell case, a known UFO incident from 1948, is also mentioned as being misrepresented in these narratives.

Source Analysis and Misinformation

UFO-Nytt scrutinizes the sources of these stories, including the American magazine 'SIR', the Uruguayan newspaper 'El Nacional', and later publications. It notes that the 'Stuttgarter Tageblatt', cited as a source for the Spitsbergen story, may not have even existed. The magazine emphasizes the tendency for misinformation to spread within the UFO community, with some researchers uncritically accepting and propagating unverified claims.

Investigations and Official Stances

The article details various investigations and official responses to these cases. The Norwegian Ministry of Defence and the Norwegian Air Force have consistently denied any knowledge of a UFO crash on Spitsbergen. The Condon Report is cited as concluding that the Spitsbergen story had 'no basis in fact'.

Key Individuals and Their Roles

Several individuals are mentioned in connection with these stories, including:

• Hans Larsen Løberg: Presented as a Norwegian scientist involved in the Helgoland investigation, but likely fictional.
• E.W. Grenfell: Author of the 'Sir!' article on the Helgoland crash.
• Thomas K. Bandell (Mantell): Pilot who died pursuing a UFO in 1948.
• Frank Edwards: Author whose book 'Flying Saucers - Serious Business' is cited as a source.
• Gernod Darnhyl: A colonel mentioned in connection with the Spitsbergen investigation, but his nationality is disputed.
• Trygve Mortensen: An informant who reportedly heard about a UFO sighting over Svalbard.
• Ole Jonny Brænne: The author of this article, who concludes that the Spitsbergen and Helgoland cases are fabrications.

Analysis of Aircraft Capabilities

To further debunk the Spitsbergen crash narrative, the article analyzes the capabilities of Norwegian Air Force aircraft in 1952. It concludes that the operational range of aircraft like the De Havilland DH 100 Vampire and the Republic F-84 Thunderjet made a mission to Svalbard and back, especially with the alleged requirement to circle the crash site for an hour, highly improbable due to fuel limitations and runway availability.

UFOs in Space

The issue also briefly touches upon UFO sightings in space, mentioning observations by astronauts during the Apollo missions to the moon and during the Gemini program. It notes that NASA has generally denied or not officially reported on these sightings.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The overarching theme of this issue is the critical examination and debunking of sensationalist UFO claims. The editorial stance is clearly skeptical, emphasizing the importance of factual evidence and rigorous investigation. The magazine aims to separate fact from fiction and to expose misinformation within the UFO phenomenon. The author, Ole Jonny Brænne, strongly refutes the Spitsbergen and Helgoland cases, labeling them as 'pure fabrication' and 'hoaxes'. The article highlights the tendency for such stories to persist despite a lack of evidence, urging readers to be cautious of unsubstantiated reports.

This document is a chronological bibliography titled "SPITSBERGEN-SAKEN 1952: KRONOLOGISK BIBLIOGRAFI". It meticulously lists hundreds of published works, including newspaper articles, magazine reports, books, and letters, related to UFO sightings and the 'Spitsbergen Saucer' incident. The bibliography spans from 1952 to 1991, documenting the evolution of reporting and research on the topic.

Bibliographic Entries

The bibliography is organized chronologically, with each entry providing details such as the title of the publication, author(s), and source (e.g., newspaper name, journal, book publisher). Many entries are in German, Swedish, Norwegian, Danish, and other European languages, reflecting the widespread interest in UFO phenomena across the continent.

Key themes include reports of flying saucers, alleged crashes, and investigations into these events. The 'Spitsbergen Saucer' incident appears to be a recurring subject, with numerous entries specifically referencing it. Some entries are marked with "IKKE SETT!" (Not Seen!) or "EKSISTERER IKKE!" (Does Not Exist!), indicating skepticism or lack of verification for certain reports.

Notable authors and publications cited include Donald E. Keyhoe, Frank Edwards, Jimmy Guieu, and various newspapers and journals like Saarbrücker Zeitung, Berliner Volksblatt, Aftontidningen, Morgenposten, Tempo, The London Times, UFO-Nachrichten, and Flying Saucer Review.

The bibliography also includes references to official reports, such as a FOIA CIA document and U.S. Air Intelligence Information Reports, as well as personal correspondence (letters) between individuals and organizations involved in UFO research.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring theme is the documentation of UFO sightings and related incidents, with a strong emphasis on the Spitsbergen case. The sheer volume of entries suggests a significant and sustained interest in these phenomena over several decades. The inclusion of skeptical notes like "IKKE SETT!" indicates that the bibliography aims to be comprehensive, encompassing both reports and their subsequent assessments or dismissals. The editorial stance appears to be one of archival collection, presenting a historical record of the discourse surrounding UFOs without explicit endorsement or refutation of the phenomena themselves.

This document comprises a list of references and correspondence entries, primarily from early 1991, related to UFO phenomena. The entries originate from various sources including magazines like UFO Magazine and UFO Universe, and local newspapers such as Svalbardposten. The primary recipient of much of this correspondence appears to be Ole Jonny Brænne.

Content Breakdown

"Crashed saucer stories"

This section begins with a reference to "Crashed saucer stories" by Vicki Cooper, published in UFO Magazine, volume 6, number 1, dated January/February 1991, on page 15.

Svalbard UFO Incident Inquiry

A significant portion of the entries pertains to a potential UFO incident on Svalbard in 1952. A letter from Colman S. VonKeviczky to Ole Jonny Brænne, dated February 7, 1991, poses the question: "Noen som har hørt om fly- eller UFO-krasj på Svalbard i 1952?" (Has anyone heard about a plane or UFO crash on Svalbard in 1952?).

Subsequent entries from Svalbardposten (February 8, 1991, page 12) and UFO Universe (February-March 1991, page 58) further explore this topic, with headlines like "UFO'en - lik en sigar" (The UFO - like a cigar) and "Mer om sigarformet 'UFO''" (More about the cigar-shaped 'UFO').

Correspondence and Reports

Several letters and reports are documented:

• A letter from Colman S. VonKeviczky to Ole Jonny Brænne (February 7, 1991).
• An article in Svalbardposten (February 8, 1991) titled "UFO'en - lik en sigar".
• An article in Svalbardposten (February 22, 1991) titled "Those who care to tell the truth", attributed to Commander X.
• An article in UFO Universe (February-March 1991) titled "Mer om sigarformet 'UFO''".

• A letter from Lieutenant Colonel K. Drægni and Major R. Glenne of the Armed Forces Museum (Forsvarsmuseet) to Ole Jonny Brænne, dated March 14, 1991. This letter is associated with the headline "U.S. Air Force kom med frukt og helikoptre" (U.S. Air Force came with fruit and helicopters), published in Svalbardposten on March 22, 1991, page 19.

• A letter from Anders K. Sæther of Scandinavian Historic Flight to Ole Jonny Brænne, dated April 3, 1991.

• A letter from Expedition Manager Morten Ruud and Consultant Anita Christoffersen from the Ministry of Justice and Public Security (Justis- og Politidepartementet) to Ole Jonny Brænne, dated April 22, 1991. This corresponds with a headline in Svalbardposten (April 26, 1991) stating "UFO-Norge ber om redegjørelse" (UFO-Norway asks for an explanation).

• A letter from Knut Aasheim to Ole Jonny Brænne, dated June 26, 1991.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes revolve around UFO sightings, alleged crashes, and historical UFO cases, with a particular emphasis on an incident purportedly occurring on Svalbard in 1952. The editorial stance, as suggested by the inclusion of official correspondence and inquiries from various publications and authorities, appears to be one of serious investigation and information gathering regarding these phenomena. The involvement of military and governmental entities, even if indirectly through correspondence, indicates a level of official interest or at least a response to public inquiries.