AI Magazine Summary
UFO Newsletter no 13
Ever wanted to host your own late-night paranormal radio show?
Across the Airwaves
You’re on the air. Callers bring Mothman, Fresno Nightcrawlers, UFO sightings, reptilian autopsies, and whispers about AATIP and Project Blue Book. Every reply shapes how the night goes.
20,263
issue summaries
Free. Always.
Support the Archive
Building and maintaining this collection is something I genuinely enjoy. If you’ve found it useful and want to say thanks, a small contribution keeps me motivated to keep expanding it. Thank you for your kindness 💚
AI-Generated Summary
This is issue #13 of the UFO NEWSLETTER, published by Fulcrum Productions in Morristown, N.J., USA, and edited by Lee R. Munsick. The cover date is May 1960, and the price is thirty cents. The issue incorporates C.R.I.F.O. Orbit, Satellite, UFO Critical Bulletin, UFO Digest, and…
Magazine Overview
This is issue #13 of the UFO NEWSLETTER, published by Fulcrum Productions in Morristown, N.J., USA, and edited by Lee R. Munsick. The cover date is May 1960, and the price is thirty cents. The issue incorporates C.R.I.F.O. Orbit, Satellite, UFO Critical Bulletin, UFO Digest, and Urology News. The main cover headline is "CONTENTS," listing the various sections and articles within.
Editorial and Subscriber Information
The editorial section announces the termination of the UFO Newsletter as a periodical with this issue, citing reasons explained in the previous issue. The editor, Lee R. Munsick, states that efforts will continue through other means such as periodical reports, lectures, and publicity. Special reports on unusual happenings will be distributed to cooperating groups and individuals. Prepaid subscriptions are being stopped. For readers with unexpired credits, options include a refund, keeping the credit as a contribution, or transferring it to an interim subscription with other flying saucer periodicals. Two such periodicals are recommended: APRO Bulletin, described as an intelligent, scientific, and logical approach to the flying saucer mystery, and FANTASTIC UNIVERSE, a science fiction magazine that includes UFO material. FATE magazine is also recommended for its broad scope covering psychic investigation and other scientific mysteries.
A "Message to Editors" is included, thanking cooperating periodicals and expressing a desire to continue receiving information.
Articles and Features
Cartoon Saucers Wax Unfriendly
This article discusses how humor and fiction dealing with UFOs have faced trouble. The comic strip "Twin Earths" by Alden McWilliams, which planned to incorporate true UFO cases, was vetoed by United Feature Syndicate. Similarly, Jack Sparling's strip "Sam Hill" ended abruptly after dealing with a UFO-related mystery. The article also mentions Scorchy Smith and Buck Rogers comic strips incorporating UFO themes, suggesting a trend of anti-saucer narratives or hasty conclusions.
The 'Clock Paradox' of Relativity
This section features two articles related to Einstein's theory of relativity and the "clock paradox." The first, by Thomas R. Henry, explains the paradox: a clock traveling at near light speed would experience less time than a stationary clock, leading to age differences between twins. It poses questions about whether this applies to living beings and their biological processes.
The second article, "Experimental Verification of the 'Clock-Paradox' of Relativity" by Frank S. Crawford, Jr., reprints a report originally from the Washington Evening Star. It details experiments using pi mesons to verify the time dilation predicted by special relativity. The article discusses the assumptions involved and cites previous experiments by Rossi, Hilberry, Hoag, Rasetti, and Blackett, as well as a new experiment by Harold Ticho, concluding that these experiments verify the asymmetrical aging prediction of relativity.
Fact, Fiction and Flying Saucers
Richard Hall's article critiques the state of Ufology, arguing that it is corrupted by meaningless speculation and deliberate distortion of facts. He distinguishes between proven facts and speculative notions, advocating for a focus on solid, geometrical objects reported by reliable observers. Hall criticizes the inclusion of unrelated phenomena like "skyquakes" and "ice-falls" and the tendency to label any unexplained aerial object as a "space-ship." He calls for UFO editors to be more selective and critical to uncover the truth.
News Items
This section includes brief news items such as "TV Shows Push UFO's, E.S.P.," "News of the Other UFO-Zines," and "Frank Edwards Back on Radio."
Fiction
"Colonel Cup and the Saucer" by C. B. Allen is featured.
Sighting
"Four UFOs Over Wisconsin" by Florence E. Cummins recounts a personal sighting on August 11, 1955, of four white, dash-like objects moving fast in formation, which disappeared with a brilliant flash. The author concludes they were not planes due to their formation, color, and lack of noise.
Notices
"Yours Free!" is a brief notice.
Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance
The recurring themes in this issue include the scientific exploration of UFO phenomena, particularly through the lens of physics and relativity, and a critical examination of the Ufology field itself. There is a strong emphasis on distinguishing between factual evidence and speculation, with a call for a more rigorous and scientific approach. The editorial stance, as indicated by the termination of the newsletter and the critical articles, suggests a move towards more focused, perhaps less frequent, but more scientifically grounded dissemination of information, while also acknowledging the continued interest in the mystery of UFOs.
This issue of UFOlogy, identified by its issue number 10, focuses on critical analysis within the UFO community and public perception of the phenomenon. The cover prominently features an editorial titled "MICHAEL MANN AND HIS METHODS," indicating a critical examination of a specific individual's work.
Editorial: Michael Mann and His Methods
The editorial addresses an article by Michael G. Mann in the September 1959 issue of "Saucer News," titled "Who Is Fooling Donald Keyhoe?" The editor of UFOlogy views Mann's article as a deliberate attempt to slander Major Donald E. Keyhoe and NICAP. The editorial criticizes Mann's article for its inaccuracies, unsupported conclusions, and spurious logic. A specific instance cited involves Mann's alleged illegal and unethical use of Mr. Munsick's private correspondence, including altering statements to suit his own purposes. The example given is the modification of a statement regarding the disappearance of six planes from Fort Lauderdale Naval Air Station in 1945, where the deletion of "Air Force" changed the meaning and scope of Mr. Munsick's reply. The editor expresses a desire for Ufologists to work together ethically and sincerely, urging the community to move past petty disputes. The editorial also notes that Mr. James Moseley, editor of "Saucer News," has been requested to print a reply from Mr. Munsick, and warns other publishers against quoting Mr. Mann without permission, threatening legal action.
Richard Hall's Contributions
The issue acknowledges Richard Hall, a figure well-known in Ufology, for his past work editing and publishing "Satellite," described as a "finest conservative contribution to the UFO publishing field." Hall also served as Secretary to the National Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena (NICAP) and was the Associate Editor of NICAP's UFO Investigator. The magazine expresses its indebtedness to Hall for an accompanying article on "logic and the UFO," which is deemed much needed in the field and has been lacking since the publication of Waveney Girvan's book, "Flying Saucers and Commonsense."
Book Club Promotion
A significant portion of the magazine is dedicated to promoting the "MYSTIC ARTS BOOK CLUB." The club offers a free book, "Magic and Mystery in Tibet" by Madame Alexandra David-Neel, to new members who purchase a first selection. The book club provides access to various titles on occult lore, mysticism, and esoteric subjects at reduced member prices. A list of available books is provided, including titles on yoga, Egyptian magic, religion, witchcraft, and alchemy, along with their list and member prices. The promotion encourages readers to start a library of the unknown and mysterious and offers a cancellable trial membership.
Fiction: Colonel Cup and the Saucer
The issue includes a fictional story titled "COLONEL CUP AND THE SAUCER" by C. B. Allen. The story humorously depicts Colonel Cup, an Air Force officer assigned to "Project Saucer," who is frustrated by his assignment and the nature of UFO reports. He is sent to Bright Sands during a harsh desert season and encounters a sensationalist magazine publisher, Hank Swoose, who claims to be a friend of the Chief of Staff. Swoose is eager for a story about flying saucers and pressures Colonel Cup for details. The story culminates in Colonel Cup fabricating a tale about a crashed saucer and its twelve-inch-tall crew that subsists on "mouse milk," leading Swoose to excitedly plan an entire issue around the fabricated story. The story serves as a satire on the media's sensationalism and the military's involvement in UFO investigations.
UFOS AND PUBLIC OPINION
Charles G. Morris II contributes an article discussing his experiences addressing student groups in Connecticut about the UFO problem. He describes the typical reactions: initial astonishment and interest, followed by agreement based on his perceived expertise, and then doubt. Morris emphasizes the importance of presenting information from various sides and encouraging individuals to form their own conclusions. He notes that students, accustomed to rigorous education, were challenged by the UFO topic and that the government has sometimes misled the public on such issues. Morris highlights the need for a "stimulus" to create doubt and encourage self-decision regarding the UFO problem, suggesting that private UFO organizations play a role in this.
Flying Saucers from "Outer Space"
W. E. Cox writes an article exploring the relationship between psychical research and flying saucer phenomena. Cox suggests that while clairvoyance and telepathy can explain phenomena like "ghosts," flying saucers might not be easily categorized as imaginary or "supernormal." He argues that while real aerial phenomena are witnessed, the lack of concrete evidence, such as permission to document landing craft, warrants caution. Cox suggests that many sightings can be attributed to natural sky phenomena or man-made devices, and that the "unknown" one percent is less logically explained by extraterrestrial origins than by withholding judgment until more definitive evidence emerges. He stresses the need for empirical evidence from detailed sightings by competent witnesses. Cox also touches upon the history of flying saucer reports, referencing Ezekiel and noting the increase in sightings correlating with population growth and media interest. He contrasts the high number of UFO sightings reported by sources like Adamski with the much lower numbers reported by official sources like ATIC, suggesting a "public epidemic" hypothesis rather than an "actual invasion."
Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance
The issue consistently critiques sensationalism in UFO reporting and media, particularly highlighting the actions of Michael G. Mann and Hank Swoose. There is a strong emphasis on the need for logical, ethical, and evidence-based approaches to UFO investigation, contrasting this with what is perceived as government secrecy or obfuscation and media hype. The magazine advocates for critical thinking and encourages readers to question information, rather than blindly accepting it, whether from official sources or from enthusiasts. The editorial stance appears to be one of cautious skepticism towards unsubstantiated claims, while remaining open to the possibility of genuine phenomena that require rigorous investigation.
This issue of "FLYING SAUCERS: THE OFFICIAL ATTITUDE" by Alejandro de la Jara, published in June 1956, delves into the official stance of military organizations, particularly the U.S. Air Force, regarding unidentified flying objects (UFOs). The article critiques the limitations and contradictions inherent in these investigations, contrasting them with the growing interest and efforts of civilian UFO research groups.
The Official Attitude and Its Limitations
The article begins by detailing the vast array of descriptions for flying saucers, noting the inherent errors in eyewitness accounts due to the difficulty of accurately assessing size, distance, and speed from a single vantage point. It also touches upon the speculative nature of proposed saucer propellants, such as 'eddy currents' and 'space gravity,' highlighting the extent to which some authors have gone in their scientific speculation.
The core of the critique focuses on the Air Force's investigation of UFOs. The author argues that while the Armed Forces are competent in military strategy, they lack the necessary broad scientific groundwork to authoritatively address complex scientific phenomena like UFOs. This incapacity is illustrated by General Samford's press conference in July 1952, where his reliance on Dr. Menzel's unconvincing theory and his evasive answers were noted by journalists.
Furthermore, the article points out that military investigations are constrained by military regulations and political considerations. An investigating body composed of military personnel is not an independent organization and may be pressured to suppress conclusions that are not politically expedient. This leads to the "notorious contradictions" in official statements, such as the conflicting announcements on July 4, 1947, regarding the cessation and continuation of investigations.
The "Unknown" Category and National Security Concerns
The article discusses the Air Force's classification of certain cases as "unknown," exemplified by the Chiles sighting. It suggests that the military faces a dilemma: many objects can be identified as conventional aircraft or atmospheric phenomena, but a significant number cannot. The dilemma is whether these remaining objects are Russian machines or of extraterrestrial origin. The author posits that the Air Force upholds neither solution to avoid creating panic, especially in the context of the Cold War. This policy of denial, while logical to a point, is deemed risky, as it might leave the public unprepared for a potential extraterrestrial encounter.
The Role of Media and Civilian Groups
The issue highlights the influence of media, including television shows like "Alcoa Presents" and "Science Fiction Theatre," in shaping public perception of UFOs. While these shows often present fictionalized accounts, they draw from actual UFO cases, contributing to the public's awareness and interest.
The article also reviews various UFO-related publications and newsletters, noting changes in editorship, format, and content. It mentions "Bob Young's "Ufology Condensed," "International Bulletin," "Olympic UFO Review," "Orbit," "Outer Space Review," "The Psychic Observer," "Round Robin," "The Saucers Report," and "Thy Kingdom Come," among others. The "Reader Service" section lists available books, magazines, and maps related to UFOs and space exploration.
A Proposed Solution: International Cooperation
Alejandro de la Jara proposes a plan to address the UFO enigma by uniting civilian investigation organizations worldwide under a common management. This World Organization for Civilian Investigation would aim to pool ideas and resources. Additionally, the plan suggests petitioning the United Nations to establish an International Scientific Commission composed of leading scientists from various fields to take over the official investigation, with governments sharing all accumulated data.
The article concludes by emphasizing the potential danger of the current official attitude, which it deems mistaken and potentially immensely dangerous. It argues that if UFOs are indeed extraterrestrial craft, their occupants may not adhere to a policy of silence and could decide to act, potentially leading to widespread panic if the public is not adequately informed.
Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance
The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the critique of official government and military approaches to UFO investigations, the perceived lack of transparency, and the contrast with the more open and collaborative efforts of civilian UFO research groups. The editorial stance is critical of the military's handling of the subject, advocating for a more scientific, open, and internationally coordinated approach. There is a strong undercurrent of concern that secrecy and denial could lead to greater societal disruption in the long run.
This issue of UFO Newsletter, dated May 14, 1950, and with a later update from June 15, 1952, focuses on the division among public opinion pollsters in the United States regarding the subject of flying saucers. The cover headline boldly states "PUBLIC OPINION POLLSTERS DIVIDED OVER UFO'S," accompanied by an illustration of a flying saucer.
The Minnesota Polls: A Public Service The article highlights the work of the Minnesota Poll of Public Opinion, maintained as a public service by the Minneapolis Tribune. This poll directed its attention to UFOs twice, in the spring of 1950 and again in 1952. The headlines from these polls are presented: "1950: 20% Believe Flying Disk Tales True" and "1952: 19% Say Saucers MAY Be From Other Planets."
Lack of Cooperation from Major Pollsters UFO Newsletter queried the American Institute of Public Opinion (the Gallup Poll) in Princeton, New Jersey, and the Trendex News Poll in New York City to gauge national-level efforts regarding UFOs. Despite repeated requests, both offices reportedly showed a total lack of cooperation, neither replying nor acknowledging the inquiries.
Princeton Research Service's Stance Another group, the Princeton Research Service in Princeton, New Jersey, took a "middle-of-the-road" approach. While admitting it had no specific information, the organization stated that, as a policy, it reserves the right to decide which questions will be used. Their apparent disdain for the subject was noted, with staff suggesting that "Every citizen of the state has the right to suggest questions for the New Jersey Poll," implying that Jerseyans might make "unusual, if not ridiculous, suggestions."
Editorial Call for Careful Measurement The editorial expresses a desire for public-opinion polls to engage more seriously with the subject of UFOs. It suggests that such measurement could yield important insights, provide good reading and news reporting, and potentially help change the "detestable clamp on so-called 'public opinion'" that has existed for years.
Detailed Findings from The Minnesota Poll (1950) In May 1950, the Minnesota Poll surveyed Minnesotans aged 21 and older about flying saucers. Key findings included: * Approximately 23% believed there was nothing to the stories, attributing them to imagination or hallucination. * 20% believed there was some foundation, suggesting they were military experiments, objects from other planets, or experiments by foreign countries (chiefly Russia). * 4% attributed them to balloons, meteors, or stars. * 3% believed it was a trick, gag, or stunt. * 46% had no idea what they might be. * The remaining 4% had neither heard nor read of flying saucers.
- When asked what they thought flying saucers were, the public's answers were:
- 23% said nothing at all; just hallucination, imagination.
- 17% suggested U.S. military or government experiments or experiments by other countries.
- 3% believed they were objects from other planets.
- 4% thought they were balloons, meteors, or stars.
- 3% offered miscellaneous replies.
- 46% didn't know.
Detailed Findings from The Minnesota Poll (1952) A later survey in May 1952 indicated that nearly one-fifth of Minnesota's men and women thought flying saucers might be spaceships from other planets, though the majority found this explanation fantastic. Some believed they were related to government or military experiments, while others thought they were balloons, stars, or aircraft.
- Key statistics from the 1952 poll compared to 1950:
- Government or military experiments: 19% (vs. 17% in 1950)
- Nothing at all; just hallucinations or imagination: 15% (vs. 23% in 1950)
- Objects from other planets: 5% (vs. 3% in 1950)
- Balloons, meteors, stars: 8% (vs. 4% in 1950)
- Miscellaneous replies: 8% (vs. 3% in 1950)
- Don't know: 39% (vs. 46% in 1950)
- Never heard of saucers: 4% (vs. 96% in 1950 - this seems to be a typo in the original document, likely meant to be a very low percentage for those who *had* heard/read)
More than nine out of 10 people interviewed in both surveys (96% in 1950 and 93% in 1952) had heard or read about flying saucers.
When asked if the idea of objects from other planets being operated by living beings sounded reasonable, 14% said yes, 67% said no, and 7% had no opinion.