UFO Navigator - No 040 - 2002

Magazine Overview

Title: UFO НАВИГАТОР (UFO Navigator)
Issue: N 40 (0040)
Date: September 2002
Publisher: Российский уфологический дайджест (Russian Ufological Digest)

This issue of "UFO Navigator" delves into various unexplained phenomena, with a strong focus on crop circles, UFO sightings, and a re-examination of the Tunguska event. It also features a tribute to the late science fiction writer Alexander Kazantsev and reports on a suspected alien abduction.

Main Topics

The cover highlights the passing of science fiction writer Alexander Kazantsev, a prominent figure in ufology. It also poses the question of whether the Tunguska event was an electro-discharge explosion or something else, and reports on a potential UFO victim in Pennsylvania. A quote from Lord Clancarty from a 1979 speech in the House of Lords urges the British government to reveal its knowledge of UFOs.

Crop Circles Appear Everywhere

Recent reports detail the appearance of mysterious crop circles in various locations. In Zhitikaya, Kazakhstan, a 2-meter diameter circle was found in a garden, with local authorities and experts suggesting it might be an UFO trace. The area's proximity to Russia and its history with secret military production are noted. In Ukraine, near Prostornoye, Zaporozhye region, similar circles have been appearing since July, described as flattened wheat. The patterns often involve triangles with circles at their vertices.

In the US, two large circles (approx. 30 meters in diameter) were found near Eaton Rapids, Michigan. The local sheriff attributed them to pranksters, though he acknowledged the difficulty of creating such precise patterns without machinery. The landowner expressed more concern about media attention than the damage.

Canada also reported crop circle formations. In East Garafraxa, Ontario, seven circles appeared, including a large one surrounded by smaller ones. Near Mission, British Columbia, two complex 'drawings' were discovered, one 45 meters long with intricate shapes.

UFO Sightings and Incidents

Ireland: Stephen O'Hanlon reported seeing four orange, triangular objects flying in formation over Wetherford on August 25th, at an altitude of 300-450 meters. The objects moved closely and silently.

UK: George Nidzwiedz observed a blinking object in Coldingham, Scotland, which did not move like a satellite.

Pennsylvania, USA: The case of Todd Sice, a 39-year-old man who allegedly disappeared and was found dead, is presented as a possible alien abduction. His SUV was found abandoned, and his body was discovered miles away. A peculiar detail is that one of his shoes was found on a treetop.

Rostov-on-Don, Russia: On August 17th, numerous witnesses observed a spherical UFO over Pushkinskaya Street. The object changed its trajectory and emitted a beam of light.

Semikarakorsk, Russia (1974): Victor Mishchenko reported seeing three luminous ellipses forming a triangle in the night sky. They moved silently and emitted a dim, uniform glow.

Leningrad (1978): Svetlana Makhova described a large, cigar-shaped object with a bright orange glow hovering over a 9-story building. It was later replaced by a faint, horizontal band of light.

1986: L. I. Egorova observed a cigar-shaped object of bright orange color, hanging motionless at a height of 20-250 meters. It was followed by a faint, horizontal band of light.

Beloyarskoye, Russia (1993): Near the Beloyarsk Nuclear Power Plant, three observers reported a bright, elliptical object that pulsed and changed color from turquoise to white. A шар of bright turquoise color was visible in its center, emitting a beam of light.

Alexander Kazantsev Passes Away

The issue mourns the death of Alexander Kazantsev, a renowned science fiction writer and ufologist, at the age of 96. Kazantsev was known for his speculative theories, particularly his hypothesis that the Tunguska event of 1908 was caused by an alien spacecraft with a nuclear engine. His research compared seismic data from the Tunguska event with that of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima, finding striking similarities. Kazantsev was a proponent of the idea that Earth's civilization was influenced by extraterrestrial visitors and explored themes of parallel worlds and time anomalies in his works. He co-authored a paper with Jacques Vallee on UFOs and participated in Erich von Däniken's film "Memories of the Future."

New 'Celestial Gates'?

The article touches upon the phenomenon of new religious movements that believe in extraterrestrial salvation. It mentions the demise of the "Heaven's Gate" sect, whose members committed mass suicide believing they would be transported to paradise by a UFO. Another sect, "The New Lighthouse" in France, also had members who attempted suicide, with the leader claiming they would be taken to Venus by "good aliens."

The Adelaide Meteorite Was Not a 'Saucer'

A bright meteor exploded over Adelaide, Australia, leading some witnesses to believe it was a UFO crash. However, astronomers quickly clarified it was a meteorite that exploded at an altitude of 30 km. Scientists were dispatched to investigate any potential fragments.

Following Up on Our Publications

Ufologist Vadim Chernobrov provided an update on the "Kyshtym dwarf" mummy, confirming it remains in Russia and its owner is known. He dismissed claims of the mummy being stolen by a UFO, suggesting it might be a result of mutation or an alien. Local doctors, however, maintain it is a mummified miscarriage, explaining its unusual features as normal for a fetus.

Investigation: The Tunguska Cosmic Body or 'Tunguska Glow'?

This section reviews the book "Tunguska Glow" by A. Olkhovator and B. Rodionov. The authors argue against the conventional theory of the Tunguska event being caused by a meteorite. Their main arguments include:

1. The absence of any meteorite fragments, despite extensive searches.
2. Eyewitness accounts and the nature of the devastation not fitting known physics for a meteorite impact.
3. Unusually bright sky phenomena preceding the event.
4. The event being a widespread phenomenon, not just a single impact.
5. Changes in ground magnetism and thermoluminescence near the impact site.

Boris Rodionov, a physicist, supports these arguments, suggesting the event could be an asteroid or even a comet. The authors propose that the Tunguska event was not caused by a cosmic body at all. They analyze Olkhovator's arguments against the meteorite theory, including the lack of physical evidence and the anomalous nature of the event. The article also touches upon the possibility of water and life on Jupiter's moon Europa, based on Galileo probe data, and Rodionov's controversial hypothesis of a technologically advanced civilization existing there.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently explores UFO sightings, crop circles, and alternative explanations for historical events like the Tunguska incident. There's a clear leaning towards the possibility of extraterrestrial involvement in various phenomena, often presenting eyewitness accounts and speculative theories. The editorial stance appears to be one of open inquiry into the unexplained, while also critically examining scientific explanations and debunking hoaxes when evidence supports it. The publication seems to champion the idea that conventional explanations are often insufficient to account for observed anomalies.

Title: UFOZONE
Issue: 19
Volume: 1
Year: 1996
Publisher: UFOZONE
Country: Russia
Original Language: Russian
Cover Headline: UFOZONE: In Search of Truth

This issue of UFOZONE delves into the controversial theories surrounding the 1908 Tunguska event, primarily focusing on a critical analysis of the tectonic hypothesis proposed by A.O. Olkhatov and B.R. The article, authored by K. Khazanovich-Wulff, argues strongly against the tectonic explanation, presenting evidence and witness testimonies that support the idea of a cosmic body impact or airburst.

Critique of the Tectonic Hypothesis

The article begins by refuting the notion that most natural bolides explode in the air without leaving a trace, citing the rare occurrence of meteorite showers like the Sikhote-Alin event. It then addresses Solyanik-Nevsky's electro-discharge hypothesis as a more plausible explanation for the Tunguska catastrophe, which it claims is not mentioned in Olkhatov's book. The author also dismisses A.O.'s tectonic nature hypothesis, noting that Professor B.R. uses a hypothetical 'flux model' that requires experimental verification.

Precursor Phenomena and Comet Encke

The unusual bright sky phenomena observed days before the Tunguska event are discussed. Researchers I. T. Zotkin and L. Kresak linked the event's radiant to the beta-Taurids meteor stream, associated with Encke's comet. V. A. Bronsten (1987, 2000) suggests the Tunguska object was a nucleus or fragment of Encke's comet, noting that the comet's tail pointed towards Earth on June 20, 1908. The article questions the physical mechanism of interaction between the comet's tail and Earth's atmosphere or magnetosphere, but asserts the interaction's reality, referencing similar atmospheric glow events two years later related to Halley's Comet.

Multiple Bolides vs. Single Event

The author challenges the idea that the 1908 event was a 'grandiose global event' simply because multiple bolides are observed annually. The focus shifts to whether there were observations of several or at least two bolides preceding the Tunguska catastrophe. The article notes that ground magnetization and thermoluminescence in the 'epicenter' area are inconsistent with ordinary meteorite falls, but are well explained by the electro-discharge hypothesis of an explosion, possibly due to strong electromagnetic radiation from the event.

Analysis of Witness Testimonies

The article meticulously examines witness accounts to counter the tectonic hypothesis. It highlights that Olkhatov, in his book, contradicts his earlier work by suggesting bolides cannot cause seismic disturbances, despite previously asserting they can. The author points out an example of seismic disturbances preceding a bolide sighting in the Krasnoyarsk region, which Olkhatov uses to argue against a bolide, but which the author interprets as evidence of a bolide's influence.

Seismic Disturbances and 'Trigger' Mechanisms

Olkhatov's argument that seismic disturbances occurring near the future explosion epicenter indicate a lack of a bolide is scrutinized. The author discusses the possibility of a 'trigger' mechanism, as suggested by B.R., where a bolide in flight could remotely activate seismic events hundreds of kilometers away. The article categorizes seismic phenomena associated with bolides into two types: weak air tremors and strong ground shaking.

Pre-Explosion Tremors

Significant attention is given to witness accounts of ground tremors felt shortly before the main explosion. The author, independently of Olkhatov, emphasizes the importance of these pre-explosion seismic events, citing testimonies from reindeer herders near the epicenter. These accounts describe waking up due to tremors, followed by a second shock, and then the explosion, light, thunder, and a whirlwind.

The 'Tectonic' Interpretation of Fireballs

Olkhatov's interpretation of fireballs as originating from tectonic faults rather than a cosmic body is critically examined. The author argues that if weak seismic disturbances occurred, it doesn't negate the possibility of a bolide. Olkhatov's explanation that fireballs, similar to ball lightning, could cause various effects, including forest flattening, is termed a 'transparent' analogy.

The 'Multiple Bolides' Argument

The article questions the evidence for multiple bolides, citing Olkhatov's reliance on a single testimony (No. 9) to support the idea of two 'pieces' of a bolide falling in different locations. The author analyzes this testimony, noting that it describes a 'curved trajectory' and possible changes in flight direction, which Olkhatov uses to argue for a non-linear path. However, the author suggests 'curved' could refer to a vertical descent rather than a horizontal maneuver.

Witness Testimony Analysis (Permyakov, Ruzhnikov, Leonov, Penigin, Farkova)

Several witness testimonies are analyzed in detail:

• Permyakov: Described a fiery column, three explosions, and a subsequent noise. Olkhatov interprets 'curved trajectory' as horizontal, while the author suggests it could be vertical. The testimony of a fragment falling is considered, but not confirmed by other witnesses.
• Ruzhnikov: Reported a 'broom with a spark shower' flying along the Urals, then turning towards the Lena River. This is presented as evidence of a maneuver, but the author dismisses it as hearsay ('broken telephone') and lacking specific details.
• Leonov: Described a meteorite flying in an arc, with an azimuth of 295° and a height of 9°, departing at 250°. The author points out discrepancies in the azimuth and suggests the boy might have misremembered details or confused it with other events.
• Penigin: Claimed to have seen an object 'turn sharply to the right at a very sharp angle.' The author questions the reliability of a 74-year-old witness recalling events from 59 years prior, especially when details like date and year are missing. This testimony is deemed irrelevant to the Tunguska catastrophe.
• Farkova: Described seeing a 'fire like a sheaf, a large flame' that seemed to hang in the air before falling. Olkhatov interprets this as 'hanging,' but the author notes that the flame then 'fell' and was followed by shooting and ground tremors. The author criticizes Olkhatov for accepting this testimony at face value, ignoring the witness's statement that the 'flame did not fly anywhere.'

Trajectory of the Tunguska Object (TKT)

The article discusses conflicting witness accounts regarding the direction of the TKT's flight, which Olkhatov uses to support the idea of a complex trajectory or multiple bolides. However, the author highlights the findings of V. G. Konenkin, who surveyed witnesses over hundreds of kilometers and established a straight, northwestward trajectory (azimuth ~300°) passing over Preobrazhenka. This finding is presented as definitive evidence against a maneuverable trajectory.

Despite Konenkin's findings, Olkhatov, along with ufologists like F. Siegel, continues to promote the idea of a curved trajectory or maneuver. The article cites two testimonies used by Olkhatov:

1. Permyakov: Already discussed, with Olkhatov interpreting 'curved' as horizontal maneuver.
2. Ruzhnikov: Again, interpreted as a maneuver, despite the author's critique of its reliability.

Duration of Sound Phenomena

The issue addresses the prolonged sound phenomena associated with the Tunguska event, which proponents of an artificial origin hypothesis use as evidence. Data from D. V. Demin and colleagues suggests that for 83% of observers, the duration was 1-30 minutes, and for 17%, over 30 minutes. The article notes that this 'complex' includes acoustic, seismic, and optical phenomena.

The acoustic phenomena are categorized:

1. False acoustic electrophone phenomena: Preceding visual observations.
2. Three strong explosions: One linked to a ballistic wave, two possibly to electrical discharges between the TKT and the ground.
3. Cannonade or artillery fire: Lasting 10-15 minutes or more, following the main explosions.

The 'artillery fire' is considered particularly interesting. A. Nevsky suggests it's due to multiple discharge channels from an electro-discharge event. The author questions this, as the main body would have already exploded. The proposed explanation is that the 'cannonade' was caused by electrical discharges (lightning) from the large ionized gas-dust cloud left after the explosion, interacting with the ground.

Witnesses near the event describe prolonged 'thunderstorm-like' phenomena after the main explosion, including flashes of light and thunder, consistent with this interpretation.

Seismic Disturbances and Meteorites

The article revisits the connection between seismic disturbances and bolides. It reiterates that meteor bodies are sources of electrical disturbances, citing historical research. The author references the classic case of a technician receiving an electric shock while repairing a telephone line after the Sikhote-Alin event.

More striking data comes from the Chulym bolide, where electrical fields induced by the bolide caused TV interference, burnt-out light bulbs, and street light outages. This suggests the induced current's voltage exceeded 104 V/m.

The author explains the link between meteor and seismic phenomena as strong electrical fields induced by the bolide interacting with Earth's subsurface electrical fields, causing 'subterranean thunderstorms.' This interaction is proposed as the 'trigger' for seismic processes in the Earth's crust. The article mentions that Professor A. A. Vorobyev researched 'subterranean thunderstorms,' but his ideas were not well-received by the journal 'Physics of the Earth.'

Conclusion and Literature Review

The author concludes that there are no grounds to accept the tectonic hypothesis presented in the reviewed book. The existence of the Tunguska Cosmic Body (TKT) is affirmed, and the authors' theory of multiple fireballs from tectonic faults is deemed unfounded. V. A. Bronsten is quoted stating that Olkhatov's hypothesis is an 'ad hoc' construct, designed specifically for the Tunguska case and not supported by the facts.

The article acknowledges Olkhatov's correct observation of seismic disturbances preceding the explosion but criticizes his subsequent reasoning, which led him and B.R. into a dead end. The author attributes the positive reviews of the book to the reviewers' lack of expertise on the Tunguska catastrophe.

The issue concludes with a bibliography of relevant literature on meteors, meteorites, seismic phenomena, and the Tunguska event, including works by Russian and international researchers.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the critical examination of scientific hypotheses, the importance of empirical evidence and witness testimony in ufology and anomaly research, and the debate between naturalistic (tectonic, atmospheric) and extraterrestrial explanations for phenomena like the Tunguska event. The editorial stance is clearly in favor of the cosmic origin of the Tunguska event and critical of hypotheses that attempt to explain it through purely terrestrial geological or atmospheric processes without sufficient evidence. The article champions the electro-discharge hypothesis and the direct evidence of a cosmic body, while systematically dismantling alternative theories through detailed analysis of scientific literature and historical accounts.

Title: UFO Navigator
Issue: 10
Publication Year: 2002
Language: Russian

This issue of "UFO Navigator" delves into the intricate connections between meteoric phenomena, seismic activity, and electrical discharges, exploring theories that link these seemingly disparate events. It also touches upon historical mysteries and the broader field of urology.

The Interplay of Meteors, Electricity, and Earthquakes

The issue begins by referencing the work of A. Yu. Olkhovato, who presents evidence of seismic disturbances accompanying meteor flights, even preceding their visual detection. Olkhovato highlights the link between these disturbances and electro-acoustic phenomena, suggesting that meteors generate variable electric fields or radio-frequency electromagnetic radiation. The article emphasizes that meteors are indeed sources of atmospheric electrical disturbances, citing the classic case of a lineman receiving a strong electric shock while repairing a telephone line after the Sikhote-Alin meteor event.

More striking evidence comes from witness accounts of a meteoroid (bolide) passing over Siberia in February 1984. Residents reported persistent television interference, burnt-out light bulbs, and flickering streetlights, indicating the presence of an induced electrical field. The article points to the burning out of automatic street lighting photocells in Tomsk as particularly significant, suggesting an electrical current voltage exceeding 104 V/m, implying that the induced electrical field from the bolide surpassed this threshold. This case is presented as unprecedented in meteoritics for its extensive factual material on the electromagnetic characteristics of meteoroids.

Theories on Meteor-Seismic Connections

While acknowledging the connection between meteoric and seismic processes, A. Yu. Olkhovato admits the physical mechanism remains unclear. He discusses theories suggesting a link between the generator of the Earth's electric field and tectonic processes, or a phenomenon termed 'earth radiation.'

The article then explores the research of Professor A. A. Vorobiev and his 'Tomsk school,' which posits the existence of 'high electrical fields' (VEP) within the Earth's crust. These fields are considered reliable precursors to earthquakes and have been identified as sources of atmospheric and ionospheric electrical disturbances. Vorobiev's hypothesis suggests that earthquakes themselves result from powerful electro-discharge processes ('underground thunderstorms') within the planet. These VEPs might be located in deep crustal horizons, such as the boundary between the crust and mantle.

Further developing these ideas, the article mentions the work of Russian geologists and geophysicists who support the possibility of extended electrical discharges through rock strata at the boundary of inhomogeneities, potentially reaching fields of 107-108 V/m. These discharges are believed to be initiated by seismic disturbances. S. Yu. Balasanyan proposes that in the lithosphere, prolonged accumulation of geo-electrical energy can lead to electrical breakdown of rock formations situated between positively charged magmatic sources and the negatively charged Earth's surface. B. S. Svetov highlights that external forces, whether natural or artificial, can disrupt areas of unstable equilibrium, leading to significant changes in the Earth's structure and energy state, such as earthquakes and volcanic eruptions. Svetov lists solar and cosmic radiation, gravitational interactions, atmospheric pressure, and external electromagnetic fields as such forces, but the author suggests a crucial omission: the powerful influence of large meteoroids entering the atmosphere.

Several geologists attribute the formation of kimberlite pipes to electro-discharge processes.

Meteoroid Charge Accumulation and Explosions

The second block of models focuses on the potential for meteoroids (MT) to accumulate significant electrical charges and interact with the Earth's surface. V. F. Solyanik first proposed this idea in 1951, suggesting that MT, through interaction with Earth's electromagnetic fields and atmosphere, accumulate a positive electrical charge. The resulting trail in the atmosphere gains a negative charge due to electrons being stripped from the MT. The explosion of MT, like the Tunguska event, is theorized to occur due to ponderomotive forces when the body reaches its maximum charge capacity or through a runaway electrical discharge between the MT and the Earth's surface.

Similar ideas were put forth by physicist A. P. Nevsky in 1978, who proposed a different mechanism for charge accumulation but also linked meteoroid explosions to electro-discharge processes between the MT and the Earth's surface. N. L. Sergienko and V. K. Zhuravlev further developed this concept in a more complex model of the Tunguska explosion, suggesting that a high-energy plasma condensation within the body, activated during atmospheric braking, leads to a concentration of electrostatic energy, causing the explosion.

Thus, the article posits that electrical disturbances caused by meteoroid passage are not only responsible for atmospheric and ionospheric phenomena but also for seismic activation of the Earth's crust. This is attributed to 'weak' electro-discharge processes in the Earth's interior, initiated by the induced electrical field from natural or artificial bolides.

The Role of Artificial Objects and Spacecraft

The discussion extends to whether large artificial objects in the atmosphere could also trigger seismic activity. The article notes that aircraft can accumulate high electrical potentials (up to 106 V for airplanes, 104 V for rockets). It is suggested that the fiery ball observed on November 16, 1984, at an altitude of 59 km during the Space Shuttle's re-entry might be related to its electrical charge. More significantly, seismic tremors were recorded in Washington State in December 1992, following another Space Shuttle re-entry, which were not explained by acoustic waves alone. This suggests that artificial objects, like meteors, can accumulate electrical charges and induce them onto the Earth's surface.

However, the induced electrical field from spacecraft appears to dissipate as they descend and slow down. This field can initiate 'weak' electro-discharge processes in 'sensitive' zones of the Earth's crust. The article speculates that if a spacecraft had passed over a tectonically inactive region like the North American Platform, such interactions might not have occurred. Instead, the re-entry over the tectonically active Cordilleras region, with its volcanic and seismic activity, suggests that even weak induced electrical fields could act as a 'trigger' for seismic disturbances.

The author proposes that spacecraft re-entries could serve as a model for studying meteoroid phenomena, given the known flight paths and times, allowing for better preparation for data collection. This includes deploying electro-measuring and seismic detection equipment in tectonic zones.

In conclusion, the article argues that the concepts of interaction between the electrical fields of meteoroids and the Earth provide explanations for various problems in meteoritics, geology, and geophysics. The seismic disturbances caused by meteoroids and artificial objects are linked to 'weak' electro-discharge processes in the Earth's interior, initiated by induced electrical fields from natural or artificial bolides.

Historical Mysteries: Springheeled Jack and Gentry

The issue also features sections on historical mysteries. "Springheeled Jack" is described as a mysterious creature that terrorized London in the 19th century, reportedly attacking victims with fire, gas, and electrical discharges. While no flying apparatus was reported, ufologists often link this phenomenon to UFOs. Descriptions of Jack include sharp ears, glowing eyes, and the ability to emit blue flames and burning gas. His appearance is detailed as tall, thin, strong, with a prominent nose, powerful hands resembling claws, and remarkable agility. He wore a long cloak, a metallic helmet, and a tight-fitting jumpsuit. A lantern was often seen on his chest. One of his alleged victims described his face as 'horrible and repulsive.' While most victims survived, one murder was attributed to him. Similar incidents, like the 'Mad Gasser' of Mattoon, Illinois, and Botetourt, Virginia, are compared to Springheeled Jack's activities.

"Gentry" are introduced as supernatural, small-statured beings from Irish and Celtic folklore, often compared by ufologists (like Jacques Vallee and John Keel) to 'little green men' from UFOs. The article references Walter Evans-Wentz's book "The Fairy Faith in Celtic Countries" (1909), which contains folklore about 'gentry' providing endless food and taking people to their magical lands. A peasant's account describes 'gentry' as a numerous, good-natured people living in mountains, possessing extraordinary abilities and residing in palaces within the mountains. The article notes a similarity between these accounts and those of 'enlonauts' (UFO occupants), though it suggests the comparison might be exaggerated.

Morris Jessup and the Philadelphia Experiment

Morris Jessup (1900-1959) is mentioned as an American astronomer who studied UFOs and authored the influential book "The Case for the UFO" (1955). He died by suicide in 1959. Jessup is remembered for being the first to hear about the alleged Philadelphia Experiment, a purported US Navy experiment involving the teleportation and invisibility of the destroyer escort USS Eldridge.

Book Review: "The Voyage of Saint Brendan"

A review is provided for "The Voyage of Saint Brendan" (St. Petersburg, "Azbuka-Klassika", 2002), a collection of medieval chronicles. The review notes that ufologists often try to link medieval tales of 'flying ships' and 'sky countries' to modern UFO phenomena. This collection includes original texts about various wonders, such as anchors getting stuck near churches, stories of 'green children,' and other tales that have fueled ufologists' imaginations. The reviewer suggests that reading these legends alongside other medieval manuscripts, which casually mention events like Judas flying to Jerusalem or saying mass on the back of a giant fish, makes drawing significant conclusions from the 'fertile imagination of monks' questionable. The book is highly recommended for those interested in John Keel or Jacques Vallee who wish to explore alternative hypotheses beyond the 'alien' explanation for UFOs.

Editorial Stance and Challenges in Urology

The magazine's editorial section addresses the state of urology in Russia. It acknowledges the ongoing global and local cataclysms and the activities of the Commission on Pseudoscience under the Presidium of the Russian Academy of Sciences, while noting that UFO observations continue worldwide. In Russia, scientific and public organizations like the Academy of Informationological and Applied Urology (AIPUFO) and the International Ufological Association (MUA) are active. After overcoming initial naive belief in aliens, pressure from orthodox scientists, and fanaticism, AIPUFO and MUA have been pursuing scientific knowledge for two decades, uniting enthusiastic scientists. Their research has led to new directions such as ufometry, paleocosmology, contactology, and post-contact rehabilitation.

AIPUFO's significant achievement is presented as the refutation of astrophysicist I.S. Shklovsky's assertion about the uniqueness of intelligent life in the universe. Based on 25 years of UFO data, they have empirically and experimentally established the informational-energetic multipresence on Earth and in near-Earth space, and the influence on humans, nature, and technology of a non-human intelligence with superior technical capabilities. This, they argue, proves that humanity is not alone in the universe. The most challenging aspect was developing a precise definition of 'intelligence' and criteria for identifying artificiality in observed UFOs.

The content of a patent for this discovery, issued by the International Chamber of Informational-Intellectual Novelty, was presented by AIPUFO President V.G. Azhazha at the UN in New York on January 6, 2001.

Other achievements of AIPUFO and MUA include the activities of the Scientific Expert Council on Urology and Bioenergoinformation at MAI, educational and practical work of the Institute of Post-Contact Rehabilitation, and expeditions by the public research association "Cosmopoisk." Despite the democratization and openness, the urological field is described as a 'minefield.' The article claims that forces in Russia and abroad are actively hindering the development of domestic scientific and public urology and bioenergoinformation. Methods used include discrediting AIPUFO and MUA through slander, falsification, and dissemination of misinformation via media and the internet, as well as threats, arson, and even physical violence. The Eastern European Ufological Association is named as a perpetrator, with some activists reportedly undergoing forced psychiatric treatment for alleged attempts on a ufologist's life and arson. A. A. Anfalov is also mentioned for fabricating 'facts about UFO catastrophes' allegedly concealed by authorities.

Linguist B.A. Shurinov is singled out for discrediting Russian urology by promoting fabrications and slanders on an international level, allegedly falsifying parliamentary hearings and engaging in smear campaigns against academics. The article laments the damage caused to ufologists and young Russian urology due to threats, arson, reprisals, slander, and aggression, leading to a decrease in the number of urological groups and reduced demand from foreign contacts and domestic media.

The authors call upon Russian scientists studying anomalous phenomena and those who uphold the spirit of science, inspired by Vernadsky, Tsiolkovsky, and Chizhevsky, to unite against the infiltration of 'evil' into science. They urge colleagues to actively counter negative trends in Russian urology and bioenergoinformation through scientific discussion and, when necessary, through legal channels.

The issue announces the 10th Anniversary International Ufological Conference in Moscow on October 26-27, 2002, intended to demonstrate the commitment of true ufologists to ethical traditions in Russian and world science. The announcement is made on behalf of Pavel Popovich, Honorary President of MUA, and Alexey Burenin, Vice-President of AIPUFO.

Technical Issues

The editorial team apologizes for the lack of illustrations in this issue due to ongoing technical problems with their new computer and the "UFO Navigator" editor. They express hope that these issues will be resolved by the next issue.

Miscellaneous: Meteorite Incident

A brief report describes a near-miss incident involving a 14-year-old girl, Siobhan Coughton, from Great Britain, who claimed a meteorite hit her leg. The object, described as a hot stone with characteristic pitted marks, reportedly grazed her leg without causing injury. The article sarcastically notes that this incident was "long overdue."

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the scientific investigation of anomalous phenomena, particularly the links between meteors, electrical fields, and seismic activity. The magazine promotes a rational, evidence-based approach to urology, distinguishing it from pseudoscience and sensationalism. There is a strong emphasis on the need for scientific rigor, collaboration among researchers, and the defense of scientific integrity against misinformation and personal attacks. The editorial stance is one of advocating for a more serious and organized approach to the study of UFOs and related phenomena, while also acknowledging and attempting to explain historical mysteries through scientific lenses. The publication appears critical of unsubstantiated claims and promotes a unified front against those who would discredit the field through unethical means.

This issue of the magazine, titled "UFO", published in September 2002, features a cover headline about the deadly potential of meteorites and includes articles on historical meteorite impacts, a confrontation involving astronaut Buzz Aldrin, and the use of satellite technology to search for Noah's Ark.

Meteorites: The Sky's Deadly Rain

The issue begins with an anecdote about a girl who found what she believed to be an iron meteorite. The article then delves into historical accounts of meteorite falls, citing instances where they have caused death and destruction. It mentions a case from 1836 where a meteorite allegedly killed two people in America after falling through a cottage roof. Another account from 1647 describes a meteorite weighing 8 pounds killing two sailors on a Swedish ship. The magazine also references a similar incident in Georgia in 1826 and the death of an Indian named Elika in July 1829 due to a meteorite. Chinese chronicles report ten deaths from a 'stone rain' in 616 AD, and 35 Saxon villages were reportedly destroyed by falling stones in 823 AD. A significant event occurred on September 4, 1511, near Crema, where over a thousand meteorites fell, some weighing over a hundredweight, resulting in the death of a nearby priest. The article notes that over a century later, a monk near Milan was killed by a meteorite. In the 19th century, such incidents became more frequent, with a report from 1885 detailing a farmer in Somerset, Kentucky, being killed by a meteorite from a clear sky. The impact was described as devastating, with the farmer's head crushed, clothing torn and burned, and body covered in molten metal. A tragic event in Yugoslavia on November 20, 1929, involved a red-hot meteorite, 40 cm in diameter, hitting a wedding procession, killing one guest and injuring another. The article also touches upon maritime incidents, such as the sinking of the sailing ship "Eclipse" in 1908 after being pierced by a meteorite, forcing the crew to abandon ship. Another incident involved the sailing ship "Sagittarius" in the Atlantic Ocean, which sank rapidly after a meteorite strike, though the crew was rescued by a passing steamship.

Buzz Aldrin Confrontation

The magazine then shifts focus to a recent event involving astronaut Buzz Aldrin. It reports on a confrontation where Aldrin allegedly punched filmmaker Bart Sibrel, who had publicly questioned the authenticity of the Apollo moon landings. Sibrel reportedly approached Aldrin and asked him to swear on the Bible that he had been to the Moon. In response, the 72-year-old astronaut allegedly struck the 37-year-old filmmaker. Sibrel subsequently filed a police report. Lieutenant Joe Lombardi stated that Aldrin had left the hotel before police arrived. However, another officer, Lieutenant Gilmond, presented a different account, suggesting that Sibrel had approached Aldrin aggressively and hit him with a Bible, forcing Aldrin to defend himself. The article notes that even if Aldrin's lawyer's version is a fabrication to protect him, the elderly astronaut is unlikely to face serious consequences, and the incident serves as a lesson to those who criticize space heroes.

Satellites Search for Noah's Ark

The final major section of the magazine discusses the use of satellites in the search for the legendary Noah's Ark. It reports that "Americans decided to search for the legendary Noah's Ark using satellites." In late summer, the QuickBird satellite began photographing the mountainous region in eastern Turkey where Mount Ararat is located, the traditional landing site of Noah's Ark according to biblical legend. Researchers are eagerly awaiting the results from the so-called "Ararat anomaly," a strangely shaped formation situated at an altitude of approximately 4725 meters above sea level, measuring about 183 meters in length. This anomaly was first detected in 1949 by a US military aircraft conducting aerial surveys of Turkey. It was subsequently photographed by the American spy satellite Keyhole-9 in 1973 and the reconnaissance satellite Keyhole-11 in 1976. CIA workers who processed these satellite images in the 1970s found the data difficult to interpret. Porcher Taylor, who worked for the CIA at the time, described the images as quite unexpected, and the materials collected by Keyhole-9 and Keyhole-11 remain classified. Researchers are now relying on photographs from commercial satellites. In 1999 and 2000, the IKONOS satellite, owned by Space Imaging, provided images of Ararat, but they did not help solve the mystery. Currently, there are three main theories explaining the anomaly's origin: it could be a geological formation, a glacier, or the remains of Noah's Ark. The article concludes by mentioning that the QuickBird satellite, launched less than a year prior, is capable of capturing images with a resolution of up to 60 cm, a record for civilian-use satellites, but so far, all its images of the Ararat region have been obscured by clouds.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue of "UFO" magazine appears to maintain a stance that explores unexplained phenomena, historical mysteries, and controversial events related to space and extraterrestrial possibilities. The magazine presents historical accounts of potentially dangerous natural events (meteorites) alongside modern scientific endeavors (satellite imagery) and human conflicts (Aldrin-Sibrel incident). The editorial approach seems to be one of reporting on intriguing events and ongoing investigations, leaving room for speculation and further research, particularly concerning the Ararat anomaly and its potential connection to the Noah's Ark legend.