UFO Mail - No 128 - 2011

Magazine Overview

Title: Skandinavisk UFO Information
Issue: UFO-Mail nr. 128
Date: March 17, 2011
Publisher: Danmarks UFO Forening

This issue of Skandinavisk UFO Information focuses on the analysis and resolution of several reported UFO/UAP sightings, alongside a report on an amateur astronomical observation.

Case 1: Flickering White Object Over Peblingesøen

This article, authored by Ole Henningsen, details an investigation into a video sequence of a "flickering white object" observed over Peblingesøen. The footage, received by SUFOI's Photo Department, was of HD quality, making it particularly interesting for analysis. The object was described as small, white, and changing direction with a flickering appearance.

The photographer, Thorsten Dreijer, a professional with 20 years of experience in film and video, captured the footage in January 2010, when the lakes in Copenhagen were frozen. He initially filmed "stock-shots" of the ice and only later noticed the object. He humorously speculated if it was a "seagull in camouflage flying at 2,500 an hour." The exact time of the recording was narrowed down to January 26, 2010, between 2 PM and 3 PM.

SUFOI's photo consultant, Hans Bødker, analyzed the video using the "Line Draw" tool in the Vegas Pro editing software. This process revealed that the object had flapping wings and an irregular flight path, characteristic of a bird. A second, less visible bird was also detected in the upper right corner of the frame. The analysis concluded that the object was indeed a bird, likely a seagull, confirming Dreijer's initial, albeit humorous, suspicion. Dreijer expressed his amusement, stating, "Yes, it seems it is a fact that my UFO was a duck after all :-) Thanks to SUFOI for the clarification. It's truly incredible what light reflections can make you believe..."

A link to the original video, slow-motion, and enlarged versions is provided: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kuM8-u2xDSU.

Case 2: Orange Lights Over Brande

Authored by Ole Henningsen, this section reports on a series of sightings of small orange lights over Brande during the weekend of March 5-6, 2011. Several witnesses reported seeing multiple orange objects moving at high speed and silently. One observation by six people described groups of 3-5 objects maintaining the same distance and speed, appearing like "pearls on a string."

Initially, the cause was unknown, with SUFOI seeking other witnesses and solutions. However, a witness named Anne Ravn Bach later contacted Brande Bladet to explain the phenomenon. She reported that the lights were small hot air balloons launched from a party at Remisen in Brande. This resolved the mystery, with the article noting that while hot air balloons are often used for events like weddings, this specific incident was resolved by a local witness.

Case 3: Observation from Stenløse

This article details an observation made by 62-year-old land surveyor Esben Schmidt Sørensen from Stenløse on July 27, 2008, at 1:50 AM. Sørensen observed two bright lights in the sky, positioned one directly above the other, under the right part of the Pegasus constellation. He noted that these lights were brighter than expected for stars in that location and ruled out planets. The lights then disappeared within 15 seconds, with irregular light variations suggesting clouds, though the sky was clear.

Sørensen, with considerable apprehension, concluded they were not stars, satellites, or comets, but two UFOs. He described their vertical alignment and position relative to Altair. The observation lasted about 2 minutes, during which the lights remained stationary. He later estimated their position to be R 23h50m D 9 degrees 21 minutes, corresponding to the star 80 Pegasi.

He emphasized that the lights were stationary throughout the observation and that the sky was clear. Sørensen, who does not actively seek out UFO phenomena, reported the sighting to SUFOI's website, but it was unfortunately not registered due to issues with the archive system at the time. He has since re-submitted the report, hoping for corroborating information or an explanation. He considered possibilities like weather balloons but found them unlikely given the stationary nature and simultaneous disappearance.

Case 4: Observation from Bjørnstrup

This report describes an incident from Bjørnstrup near Kalundborg, where an observer reported a white light in the sky that allegedly nearly collided with a passenger plane. The light was seen moving from west to east over the sky in approximately 1-2 minutes. Similar to the Stenløse case, this observation was not properly registered due to problems with the archive system. The observer archived their report in the American database NUFORC.

The report also mentions a simultaneous local power outage. The observer expressed interest in whether Danish pilots might have witnessed the event. Other reports from the same date were reviewed, but no direct correlation was found, including a report from Næstved.

Lack of Astronomical Explanation

For the Stenløse observation, the article states there is no astronomical explanation. While the planet Uranus is in the vicinity, it cannot be observed in the manner described. The moon was low in the east, and Jupiter was low on the horizon. The report notes that inquiries within Danish amateur astronomy circles have not yielded an explanation. SUFOI questioned the observer about cloud cover and whether the lights moved, to rule out the International Space Station (ISS) or other satellites, but this seemed unlikely due to the object's appearance and behavior.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue highlights the challenges and successes in investigating UFO/UAP reports. It emphasizes the importance of detailed analysis, particularly with modern technology like HD video and specialized software, in resolving sightings that might initially appear mysterious. The magazine demonstrates a commitment to investigating phenomena, even if the final explanation turns out to be a mundane one, such as a bird or hot air balloons. The editorial stance appears to be one of open inquiry, thorough investigation, and a desire to inform the public about the findings, while also acknowledging the limitations and occasional failures of their archival systems. The publication actively seeks public input and explanations for unexplained phenomena.