UFO Log - No 09 - 2000

Magazine Overview

Title: UFO LOG
Issue: #09
Date: Printemps 2000 (Spring 2000)
Publisher: ASSOCIATION NEXUS
Country: France
Language: French
ISSN: 1284-926X
Cover Price: 25FF (France), 30FF (Abroad)
Cover Headline: UFO LOG - Le fanzine de toutes les tendances ufologiques

Editorial Stance and Content Overview

This issue of UFO LOG, a fanzine dedicated to all ufological trends, is primarily focused on a heated debate concerning the events of November 5, 1990. The editorial, penned by Didier CHARNAY, addresses the departure of Jean Sider, a prominent ufologist, due to disagreements over publishing articles from 'debunkers.' CHARNAY defends the magazine's commitment to presenting diverse viewpoints, even those critical of ufology, emphasizing that UFO LOG aims to be a platform for all tendencies, not just those that align with specific beliefs. He highlights the importance of open dialogue and the right to respond, as evidenced by the inclusion of 'droits de réponse' (rights of reply) in this issue.

The central controversy revolves around the interpretation of the November 5, 1990, wave of sightings. Jean Sider, in an article that was initially planned but later withdrawn, reportedly attributed the events to extraterrestrial activity. In response, Robert Alessandri presents a detailed article titled "5 NOVEMBRE 1990 : LA TROMPERIE SIDERALE" (November 5, 1990: The Sidereal Deception). Alessandri argues forcefully that the phenomenon was a simple atmospheric re-entry of a satellite, challenging Sider's extraterrestrial claims.

Alessandri's article is supported by the technical expertise of Pierre Neirinck, a satellite tracking specialist. Neirinck's faxes, shared with the magazine, provide precise data on satellite re-entries, including the November 5, 1990 event. Alessandri meticulously analyzes Neirinck's findings, contrasting them with Sider's interpretations and criticizing Sider for allegedly misrepresenting data and engaging in 'disinformation.' The article scrutinizes the trajectory calculations, altitude estimates, and timing of the event, aiming to demonstrate that it aligns perfectly with a known satellite re-entry and not with an unknown aerial phenomenon.

Alessandri also addresses and refutes several points raised by Sider, including the notion of an 'inverted trajectory' and the duration of satellite re-entries. He criticizes Sider's reliance on selective information and his dismissal of scientific explanations, suggesting that Sider's stance is driven by a desire to promote his own theories rather than by objective analysis.

Articles and Features

• DROIT DE REPONSE (Right of Reply): This section includes responses to previous articles, notably one concerning the November 5, 1990 wave.
• OVNI EN ROUMANIE (UFO in Romania): An ufologist from Romania presents two cases of UFO detection by radar.
• CONTROVERSE (Controversy): A discussion about Gérard Demarcq's theory of 'Paraterrestrials.'
• BIZARRE (Bizarre): An article about a formal act involving mayors amusing themselves.
• REFLEXION (Reflection): A piece on UFOs in ancient texts, described as 'the ravishing monkey.'
• HOMMAGE (Homage): A tribute to Alain Gamard.
• DROIT DE REPONSE: Another right of reply is published.
• ABONNEMENT (Subscription): Information on how to subscribe to UFO LOG.
• BD ET OVNI (Comics and UFOs): A review of comic books related to ufology.
• REVUE DE PRESSE (Press Review): An overview of recent press coverage of ufology.
• COURRIER DES LECTEURS (Readers' Mail): Letters from readers.
• DIVERS (Miscellaneous): Other short items.

Ufological Lexicon

The issue features a "PETIT LEXIQUE UFOLOGIQUE" (Small Ufological Lexicon) that defines various terms and concepts related to UFO studies. Definitions include:

• Abbducté: A neologism for someone abducted by extraterrestrials for medical tests.
• Abduction: The act of being kidnapped by extraterrestrials for medical testing.
• Bedroom visitor: A figure that appears in witnesses' bedrooms.
• Crash: The ground impact of a flying object.
• Crop circle: English term for crop formations.
• Debunker: Someone who discredits UFO phenomena.
• Désinformation: False or misleading information used to distort reality.
• EBE (Extraterrestrial Biological Entity): An extraterrestrial being.
• ENOC (État non ordinaire de conscience): An altered state of consciousness.
• ET (Extra Terrestre): Extraterrestrial.
• HET (Hypothèse Extra Terrestre): Extraterrestrial Hypothesis.
• Hommes en noir (Men in Black): Individuals in black suits who allegedly silence witnesses.
• Hypnose: A controversial method of regression to recall past events.
• MIB (Men In Black): American abbreviation for Hommes en Noir.
• Mutilation de bétail (Cattle Mutilation): The removal of organs from livestock, often attributed to extraterrestrials.
• OVNI (Objet Volant Non-Identifié): Unidentified Flying Object.
• Scientifique: A person with scientific authority.
• Soucoupe_volante (Flying Saucer): A disc-shaped object, often assumed to be an extraterrestrial vehicle.
• Télépathie: Mental communication, often attributed to extraterrestrials.
• UFO (Unidentified Flying Object): American abbreviation for OVNI.
• Ufologie: The study of UFOs and related phenomena.
• Ufologue: A specialist in UFOs.
• Ufonaute: An extraterrestrial entity supposedly piloting flying saucers.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the critical analysis of UFO phenomena, the importance of scientific evidence versus anecdotal accounts, and the defense of open discourse within ufology. The editorial stance, as articulated by Didier CHARNAY, is one of inclusivity, aiming to present a wide spectrum of opinions and evidence, even if it leads to controversy. The magazine champions the idea that ufology should not shy away from critical examination or the inclusion of perspectives that challenge prevailing theories. The debate between Sider and Alessandri exemplifies this, with the magazine providing a platform for both sides, though clearly leaning towards a scientific, evidence-based approach in its featured articles, as seen in Alessandri's detailed refutation of Sider's claims.

This issue of UFO LOG, dated November 5, 1990, focuses heavily on the debate surrounding atmospheric re-entries of spacecraft versus genuine UFO sightings. It critically examines witness testimonies, scientific explanations, and the potential for misidentification or even deliberate obfuscation by authorities.

The Atmospheric Re-entry Debate

The central theme is the analysis of phenomena that some interpret as atmospheric re-entries of rocket stages or satellites, while others maintain they are anomalous aerial phenomena (UFOs). The magazine scrutinizes the arguments of various researchers, including Sider, who often favors the re-entry explanation, and those who present evidence for more mysterious origins.

Dimensions and Luminosity of Re-entries

One section questions the stated limits of visibility for re-entering objects, citing Sider's assertion that artificial objects do not produce sufficient luminosity to be seen beyond 150 km. The author challenges this, arguing that based on energy calculations, re-entering objects of significant mass should be much brighter, comparable to the moon, and visible from much further distances. This challenges the idea that only a 'point of light' would be visible.

The 'Artificial Object' vs. 'Meteorite' Distinction

The article highlights Sider's distinction between artificial objects and meteorites, questioning why a small meteorite should be visible from hundreds of kilometers away as a shooting star, while a multi-ton artificial object would remain invisible. This is presented as a logical inconsistency in Sider's arguments.

Witness Testimonies and Expert Opinions

Pierre Neirinck, a witness who has observed phenomena interpreted as re-entries, is quoted. He describes satellite rockets disintegrating, forming a triangle of lights with magnitudes -5 to -8, spread over a 50-degree angle. The article contrasts this with Sider's interpretation, suggesting that Sider systematically distorts witness accounts to fit his debunking agenda. The author also references Franck Marie's work, noting that even Marie found only a small proportion of reported 'explosion-flights' to be potentially anomalous, with many likely being re-entries.

The 'Platform Stage' Hypothesis

The concept of a 'platform stage' is discussed, with reference to the Proton rocket launches. The article explains the typical stages of a Proton launch and identifies potential candidates for re-entering objects based on NASA's catalog. It suggests that Sider's interpretation of a 'platform' might be a mischaracterization of a rocket stage or fairing.

Confirmation from Russian Agencies

The issue touches upon alleged confirmations from the Russian agency 'Energya' regarding the programmed re-entry of Soviet rocket stages over the former USSR. However, the article casts doubt on the reliability and completeness of this information, suggesting it might be a misrepresentation or a simplified version of events.

Case Studies: France

Several French cases are re-examined, including those from Gujan-la-Salie, Pluvigner, and Pen Men. The author argues that Sider selectively interprets these cases, often distorting witness statements to support his re-entry theory. The case of Pen Men, involving two boat crews observing a stationary object, is presented as an example where Sider allegedly downplays the anomalous aspects.

Case Studies: Romania

The magazine features a significant section on UFO cases from Romania, investigated by Emil Strainu, a radar specialist. Two prominent cases are detailed:

• The Alexeni Case (August 23, 1984): Radar at Otopeni Airport detected an object with unusual flight characteristics, including rapid ascents and descents, and significant interference with radar and radio communications. Despite initial attribution to a weather balloon, the object's behavior was deemed too anomalous for such an explanation. The object exhibited sharp turns, spirals, and speeds exceeding 10,000 km/h, and its movements were described as unlike those of a conventional aircraft or balloon.
• The Otopeni Airport Incident (August 1988): A conversation between an aircraft pilot and Otopeni air traffic control reveals the pilot observing a blue light object near their aircraft. Radar initially showed multiple targets, and the conversation suggests potential interference with radar systems, with the controller initially unable to confirm the pilot's observation.

The 'Paraterrestres' Theory

A section introduces the 'Paraterrestres' theory by Gérard Demarcq. This theory posits that advanced extraterrestrial beings, referred to as 'Paraterrestres,' originating from an ancient, highly advanced terrestrial civilization, are responsible for UFO phenomena. The theory suggests that these beings are monitoring Earth and that certain religious traditions are messengers of their presence. The article includes a summary of Demarcq's book and a critique by Michel Picard.

Critique of Ufological Methods

Throughout the issue, there is a recurring critique of certain ufological methods, particularly the tendency to distort or selectively interpret witness accounts to fit pre-conceived theories, whether for debunking or for promoting sensational claims. The article emphasizes the importance of accurate reporting and objective analysis.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the critical examination of atmospheric re-entry explanations for UFO sightings, the potential for government cover-ups or misdirection, and the analysis of anomalous radar and visual observations. The editorial stance appears to be one of skepticism towards simplistic debunking explanations and a critical approach to ufological methodologies, while remaining open to the possibility of genuine unexplained phenomena. The magazine aims to present a thorough, albeit often critical, analysis of UFO evidence and the ongoing debate within the field.

This issue of UFO LOG, titled 'Controverse,' features a series of articles and debates surrounding UFO phenomena, extraterrestrial life, and their potential origins. The publication date is Spring 2000.

Key Articles and Debates

The 'Paraterrestres' Theory: A Debate

The central theme of this issue revolves around the controversial 'Paraterrestres' theory, primarily discussed through the exchange between Gérard Demarcq and Michel Picard.

Gérard Demarcq's Perspective (Pages 1-2, 5-6):
Demarcq, a retired geology professor, proposes the 'Paraterrestres' theory, suggesting that UFOs are not of extraterrestrial origin but rather stem from an advanced, ancient terrestrial civilization. He argues that the probability of life evolving into human form on other planets is extremely low, making Earth a unique case. Therefore, he deduces that UFOs must be the product of a highly advanced human civilization from Earth's distant past (around 30,000 years ago) that has since disappeared or evolved.

Demarcq's reasoning is based on exobiological considerations, suggesting that the conditions for life, especially complex life, are rare. He posits that this ancient civilization, having mastered space travel, is responsible for the UFO phenomena observed today, and they may even be our 'initiators.' He draws parallels between ancient myths, biblical accounts, and modern UFO sightings, suggesting a continuity of these 'Paraterrestres' interacting with humanity throughout history.

He addresses the lack of definitive proof by suggesting that this civilization's technology might not leave the same traces as ours, or that their activities are deliberately subtle. He also criticizes the scientific community's resistance to considering non-extraterrestrial origins for UFOs, attributing it to a rigid adherence to Darwinian principles and anthropocentrism.

Michel Picard's Critique (Pages 3-4):
Michel Picard offers a strong critique of Demarcq's theory, labeling it as an "intellectual imposture" and a "view of the mind without any scientific foundation." Picard challenges the core tenets of the 'Paraterrestres' theory:

1. Technological Implausibility: Picard argues that any civilization capable of interstellar travel would have had to master advanced physics, including Einsteinian relativity and quantum mechanics, leading to nuclear technology. The absence of any residual nuclear traces from such an antediluvian civilization is a significant counter-argument.
2. Lack of Material Evidence: He points out that no artifacts of advanced technology (refrigerators, cars, nuclear reactors, etc.) have ever been found from such ancient periods, despite extensive archaeological and geological research.
3. Population Size and Space Conquest: Picard questions the feasibility of a small population (tens or hundreds of thousands) achieving the technological leap required for space conquest. He cites the need for a critical mass of scientists and engineers, estimated at around 40 million for exponential technological growth, as observed in modern advancements like the nuclear age and space exploration.
4. The Nuclear Paradox: Picard insists that the conquest of space is intrinsically linked to nuclear physics. Even if a civilization bypassed nuclear power, the development of advanced physics necessary for space travel would inevitably leave detectable traces.

Picard concludes that Demarcq's theory is an "utopia" and attributes the resistance to the extraterrestrial hypothesis to a dogmatic adherence to Darwinian evolution, which falsely suggests life's uniqueness on Earth.

UFOs in Ancient Texts

Fabrice Kircher's Analysis (Pages 8-9):
Kircher explores the presence of UFO-like phenomena in ancient texts, suggesting that the concept is not new. He recounts the Chinese legend of the 'monkey ravishers' from the 7th century, which describes a being that appeared as a "flying silk piece" or a "disk of light." This entity abducted women, possessed superhuman strength, and left behind mysterious writings. Kircher draws parallels between this ancient tale and modern UFO reports, including descriptions of humanoid entities, abduction scenarios, and inexplicable technology.

He also mentions the 'vimanas' from ancient Indian texts and 'Horus' from Egyptian mythology as potential references to aerial phenomena or advanced craft.

Gérard Demarcq's Book: 'Bible et OVNI' (Page 6):
Demarcq, in collaboration with Yannick Auffret, published "Bible et OVNI" (October 1999), which claims to decipher biblical texts to reveal the scientific content, the terrestrial origin of UFOs, and the history of a forgotten civilization. This work suggests that 'Paraterrestres' were involved in biblical events and influenced human history.

A Humorous Municipal Decree

Jean-Louis Decanis (Pages 7):
This section recounts a peculiar municipal decree issued in 1954 by the mayor of Châteauneuf-du-Pape, Lucien Jeume. The decree prohibited the landing and takeoff of "flying saucers" or "flying cigars" within the commune, threatening to impound any such craft. The article notes that this was likely a publicity stunt, as the municipal council was not consulted, and the decree was not officially recorded.

Homage to Alain Gamard

Marc Hallet (Page 10):
Marc Hallet pays tribute to his friend, ufologist Alain Gamard, who passed away in late 1999. Hallet describes Gamard as a modest but exceptional documentalist who specialized in uncovering rare historical documents related to ufology. Gamard was known for his meticulous analysis of these documents, identifying errors and contradictions. He was particularly noted for his deep understanding of the socio-psychological context surrounding the 1954 French UFO wave. Despite his expertise, Gamard remained largely unknown to the broader ufological community due to his modesty and reluctance to interpret his findings, preferring to accumulate facts.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the controversy surrounding the origin of UFOs, the debate between terrestrial and extraterrestrial hypotheses, and the interpretation of ancient texts and legends in the context of modern ufology. The magazine appears to present differing viewpoints, particularly through the detailed debate between Demarcq and Picard, allowing readers to engage with complex and often conflicting ideas within the field of ufology. The editorial stance seems to be one of open inquiry, encouraging critical examination of theories and evidence, while also acknowledging the historical and cultural dimensions of the UFO phenomenon.

This issue of UFO LOG, number 09, published in Spring 2000, is primarily focused on a detailed 'Right of Reply' by Patrice Roger, president of Groupe Sentinelle, addressing criticisms made by Hervé Clergot. The magazine also features reviews of various ufological publications and explores the intersection of ufology with comic books.

Droit de réponse (Right of Reply)

Patrice Roger begins by stating that Hervé Clergot is primarily motivated by financial gain, having previously held the position of secretary for Groupe Sentinelle without acting purely on a voluntary basis. Roger contrasts Clergot's contributions with those of Christian Macé, who achieved more results after taking over the secretary role.

Roger then delves into a specific dossier on the Moon published by Clergot, which he claims contains numerous errors and is still being sold. He highlights a particular NASA photo (AS12-51-8553) that Clergot presented as a UFO, but which Roger and Guy Gruais identified as a rocket stage. Roger criticizes Clergot for selling this flawed dossier and for claiming exclusive access to NASA negatives, stating that such negatives are readily available elsewhere at lower prices.

Roger further discusses Clergot's claims of discovering 'construction sites' and 'buildings' on the Moon, which he refutes. He mentions that Guy Mouny, a former colonel, investigated these claims through his contacts and learned that the 'face on the Moon' was already known to the government, with instructions to avoid public announcement. Roger suggests that the French ufological scene is amateurish and prone to disinformation, contrasting it with German publications like Magazin 2000 that are more direct.

Roger also touches upon the work of David John Oates and his research into 'mirror language' in official NASA statements, suggesting that NASA is aware of extraterrestrial life and is interested in regions like Cydonia and the lunar face. He implies that NASA might be feeding Clergot 'bogus information'.

The 'Right of Reply' also addresses Pierre Muyard's work, particularly a dossier on Mars and Cydonia Mensae. Roger clarifies that Muyard mistook nuclear explosions for circular formations in NASA images, while Guy Gruais identified a rocket stage defect. Gruais, along with Guy Mouny, is credited with discovering ruins of buildings near the pyramids of Cydonia Mensae, which is discussed in their book 'Guizeh, au-delà des grands secrets'.

Roger concludes by stating that he prefers to be considered 'crazy' and believe in a global conspiracy rather than be a 'debunker' who is unhappy with himself. He expresses regret that Pierre Muyard is working with Clergot but respects individual choices.

Roger also recounts an incident where Hervé Clergot allegedly returned FBI documents after being entrusted with them, with 267 pages missing. He dismisses Clergot's attempts to seek publicity for his own review, stating that Sentinel News does not need it.

BD & Ovni (Comics & UFOs)

This section, curated by Didier Charnay, aims to connect ufology with comic books. It moves beyond just featuring UFO-related covers to exploring how UFO themes have influenced artists. The article highlights Marvel's adaptation of Steven Spielberg's 'Close Encounters of the Third Kind' into a comic book. It also discusses 'Marvel Preview #13' from winter 1978, noting its cover art by Jim Starlin and its science-fiction story by David Anthony Kraft and Herb Trimpe, which explores themes of alien invasion and human connection. The accompanying articles in this issue are considered particularly interesting, including mentions of encounters by Jimmy Carter.

The section also references John Lennon's involvement with UFOs in comics and mentions the book 'Project Blue Book' by Brad Steiger. It notes that a curious album, difficult to find in France, offers insights into American ufology. A planned review of 'Weird Science-Fantasy' is postponed to the next issue due to pagination changes.

Illustrations from 'Bob et Bobette: Les Martiens sont là' (1980) and other comic panels depicting UFOs and aliens are included.

Revue de presse (Press Review)

This section provides summaries and reviews of various ufological magazines and publications:

• Facteur X: Reviews of issues #60 to #74, covering topics like reptilians, Chupacabras, UFO detections, past UFOs, the Nullarbor accident, giant extraterrestrials, and the SF/ufology connection.
• Science Frontières #48 (January 2000): Features an article on the COMETA report, including opinions from ufologists and specialists.
• Microscope #92 (January/February 2000): A semi-paper, semi-internet publication focusing on non-recognized sciences, this issue discusses Jean Thomas's ideas on UFOs and exchanges between Francis Gatti and others.
• La Presse Ufologique: A bulletin from a Belgian association for peace, offering information on UFOs and the paranormal, including a study by Thierry Garnier.
• UFOMANIA #25 (December 1999): Focuses on the Roswell incident, with an article by Gildas Bourdais analyzing Pierre Lagrange's book.
• Sentinel News: Reviews of issues #14, #15, and #16. Issue #14 covers recent cases and crop circles. Issue #15 discusses the Rockefeller report, Bugarach stories, the Porto Rico crash, and Billy Meier. Issue #16 pays tribute to Jimmy Guieu and includes articles questioning the moon landings and discussing the Kalahari crash, the COMETA report, and extraterrestrial skeletons.
• PARANORMAL #1 (December 1999): A new UFO magazine edited by Hervé Clergot, featuring articles on exobiology, lunar traces, chupacabra, and case reports.

Courier des lecteurs (Readers' Mail)

This section includes letters from readers:

• Raymond Terrasse agrees with the quality of UFO LOG's new presentation and the author's cautious approach to the lunar face. He also comments on an article by Jean-Paul Ronecker about lunar phenomena, finding it slightly negative in tone.
• Patrick Fresneau praises the articles by Jean Sider and finds the magazine to be of very good quality. He suggests a regular section on 'Authentic' vs. 'Hoax' UFO photos.
• The longest letter, from Patrick Fournel, critically analyzes Jean-Paul Ronecker's citation of the Alençon case (1790), questioning its reliability based on research by Christiane Piens and others. He also discusses the La Roche en Brenil case, refuting claims made by the ADRUP. Fournel concludes that extraterrestrial materials, like meteorites, will eventually find their place in the periodic table.

Divers (Miscellaneous)

Brief notes acknowledging invitations to events: Didier Charnay thanks LE SCEAU / ARCHIVES OVNI and GROUPE SENTINELLE for invitations to their general assemblies, which he was unable to attend.

Petites Annonces (Classified Ads)

• M. Jean-Louis Decanis is seeking UFO documents concerning the Hautes Alpes region (05) for a catalog he is compiling.
• Emil Strainu, a Romanian ufologist, is looking to exchange books and publications with French associations and enthusiasts.

Précision (Correction)

A reader points out an error in UFO LOG #8 regarding the author of the 'Encyclopédie de Clark', clarifying that Claude Maugé authored the entire text, with only a few entries signed by external collaborators.

Another correction clarifies that Jean-Paul Ronecker confused H.P. Wilkins (British astronomer) with H.T. Wilkins (American ufologist). The reader notes that H.P. Wilkins himself faced criticism for his theories on the 'lunar bridge', leading to his resignation from the British Astronomical Association.

An illustration on the following page is identified as a reproduction of the cover of the comic album 'Bob et Bobette: Les Martiens sont là' (1980), which originally published a story from 1956.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around ufological debates, particularly the right of reply and the critical examination of evidence. There's a strong emphasis on debunking perceived misinformation and defending the credibility of ufological research, as exemplified by Patrice Roger's extensive response to Hervé Clergot. The magazine also demonstrates an interest in the historical and cultural impact of UFO phenomena, as seen in the 'BD & Ovni' section. The 'Revue de presse' section indicates a broad engagement with contemporary ufological literature and publications, suggesting a stance of comprehensive coverage and critical analysis within the field.

Title: Ufo Log
Issue: 25
Date: Summer 2011
Publisher: association Nexus
Country: France

Contact Information

The fanzine Ufo Log is published by the association Nexus. The contact person is Didier Charnay, located at 2 rue des Chanterelles, 01000 Bourg-en-Bresse, France. The official website is www.ufolog.org.

Important Note on Digital Version

The digital version of Ufo Log is protected by copyright. Internet users are granted the right to download and store digitized issues in their personal archives. However, they are explicitly prohibited from publishing these issues online on any website, blog, forum, or social network. The sole authorized online publication platform is AFU (Archives for the Unexplained). Any unauthorized digital distribution of Ufo Log is forbidden and may result in legal proceedings.

Future Publication

A new issue of Ufo Log is in preparation and is expected to be released in 2019. The publication also notes that some older issues may still be available.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This document primarily focuses on administrative and legal aspects related to the publication of Ufo Log, specifically its digital distribution and copyright. The editorial stance emphasizes the protection of intellectual property and the control over how the fanzine's content is disseminated online, designating a single authorized channel for online access.