UFO Log - No 05 - 1998 10

Magazine Overview

Title: UFO LOG
Issue: #05
Date: October 1998
Publisher: ASSOCIATION NEXUS
Country: France
Language: French
Cover Headline: LE FANZINE DE TOUTES LES TENDANCES UFOLOGIQUES (The fanzine of all ufological trends)

This issue of UFO LOG, a non-profit fanzine dedicated to all aspects of ufology, presents a diverse range of articles and critiques. The cover features an illustration of a B-24 bomber and a pilot, with fiery streaks in the sky, hinting at themes of aviation and possibly aerial phenomena.

Articles and Content

Hypothèse: Voyageurs du Temps (Hypothesis: Time Travelers)

This extensive article by Jean-Marc GILLOT explores the concept of time travelers. Gillot begins by referencing popular culture's fascination with time travel, from Astérix Park to the movie 'Titanic'. He posits that if time travel were possible, future travelers might need to adopt the appearance and beliefs of the era they visit to remain inconspicuous. He proposes a 'Time Test' by placing a small advertisement in the magazine, inviting any future time travelers to manifest themselves at a specific time and location (latitude 50°18.33N, longitude 04°01.53, between 15H and 17H on 27/09/2003). Gillot also touches upon environmental concerns and the potential evolution of the human species, referencing scientific projects like 'Ecotron' and the theories of Yves Coppens.

The article delves into the scientific and theoretical aspects of time travel, discussing how laboratories have experimented with sending signals faster than light and the quantum physics concept of parallel universes to explain the grandfather paradox. Gillot also touches upon the idea of 'camouflage' for time travelers and the potential dangers of such power falling into the wrong hands. He concludes by suggesting that if the hypothesis is correct, time travelers would likely never reveal their presence officially.

Critique: Sider A-t-il Perce le Secret des Aliens? (Critique: Has Sider Uncovered the Secret of the Aliens?)

Authored by Michel PICARD, this article critically examines Jean Sider's latest work, 'OVNIS: Le secret des Aliens'. Picard acknowledges Sider's significant contributions to ufological research, particularly his historical work and field investigations, and his efforts to expose governmental disinformation and reductionist interpretations of UFO phenomena.

However, Picard takes issue with Sider's 'doctrine', which he defines as a thesis that attempts to fit facts into a pre-determined framework rather than relying on experimental verification. Picard argues that Sider's central hypothesis—that UFOs are 'decoys' or 'illusions' generated by a superior, non-extraterrestrial intelligence—is problematic. He questions the semantic ambiguity of the term 'leurre' (decoy) and challenges Sider's assertion that past UFO sightings were unnecessary. Picard also critiques Sider's concept of 'psychic decoys' and 'holographic decoys' as explanations for alleged alien abductions, suggesting that Sider's 'superior intelligence' operates with a protean energy fluid, possibly linked to electromagnetism.

Picard contends that Sider's doctrine, like those of sociopsychologists, is irrefutable and risks stifling further inquiry by providing a seemingly complete explanation that discourages questioning. He highlights the 'anthropocentrism' inherent in many ufological interpretations, including Sider's, which tends to interpret phenomena through the lens of human understanding. Picard also points out Sider's rejection of the Extraterrestrial Hypothesis (HET), aligning him with reductionists, though Sider still accepts the presence of a 'superior intelligence' in Earth's environment.

Picard lists several objections to Sider's thesis, including the absence of scientific rigor, the questionable nature of the 'decoy' concept, and the historical evidence of UFO sightings. He also discusses Sider's views on 'perception cervicale' and the 'mastery of matter' by this superior intelligence, ultimately suggesting that Sider's interpretation is a form of ideological substitution rather than a scientific approach.

Petit Lexique Ufologique (Small Ufological Lexicon)

This section provides definitions for a variety of ufological terms, including: Abducté (Abductee), Abduction, Bedroom Visitor, Crash, Crop circle, Debunker, Debunking, Désinformation (Disinformation), EBE (Extraterrestrial Biological Entity), ENOC (Extraordinary State of Consciousness), ET (Extra-Terrestrial), Extraterrestre, HET (Hypothetical Extraterrestrial), Homme en noir (Man in Black), Hypnose (Hypnosis), MIB (Men In Black), Mutilation de bétail (Cattle Mutilation), OVNI (Unidentified Flying Object), Soucoupe volante (Flying Saucer), Télépathie (Telepathy), UFO (Unidentified Flying Object), Ufologie (Ufology), Ufologue (Ufologist), and Ufonaute.

Other Sections

• Sommaire (Table of Contents): Lists articles such as 'Hypothèse: Voyageurs du Temps', 'Critique de la théorie de Jean Sider', 'Réflexions: Des extraterrestres hébraïsants', 'Orthoténie', 'Lettre ouverte aux socio-psychos', 'Quant désinformation rime avec pognon', 'Comment casser Picard quand il a cassé tout le monde', 'Mystère au Triangle des Bermudes français', and various columns.
• Edito: The editorial notes that the issue is late due to a lack of collaborators and mentions that subscribers will receive an index of the first four issues. It highlights that this issue is particularly critical, with several articles engaging in debates and critiques of other authors' work.
• Rubriques (Columns): Includes sections on subscriptions, 'Chroniques de l'ailleurs' (Chronicles from Elsewhere), book reviews ('Livres', 'Books'), UFO merchandise, a comic strip ('Bande dessinée'), and 'Le courrier des lecteurs' (Readers' Mail).

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are time travel, the critique of established ufological theories, and the debate surrounding the nature of UFO phenomena and alleged extraterrestrial intelligence. The editorial stance appears to be one that encourages critical thinking and open discussion within the ufological community, even if it leads to internal debates and critiques. The magazine aims to present diverse perspectives, from speculative hypotheses like time travel to rigorous critical analyses of prominent figures in the field like Jean Sider. There is a clear emphasis on questioning established narratives and exploring the complexities and potential pitfalls of ufological research, including the dangers of disinformation and reductionism.

UFO LOG #05, published in October 1998, is a French ufological magazine featuring critical analyses and discussions on various aspects of the UFO phenomenon. The issue delves into theoretical debates, critiques of debunking efforts, and explorations of potential underlying patterns in UFO sightings.

Critiques of Jean Sider's Theories

The magazine opens with a critique of Jean Sider's theoretical framework, particularly his concept of 'fluidic materialization.' Sider suggests that UFOs materialize from ambient particles like air atoms and light. The author questions the energy requirements for such a process, noting that it could potentially be as high as that of a small nuclear reactor. The critique highlights the lack of direct evidence for environmental damage or significant energy expenditure associated with these materializations, suggesting that Sider's explanations are speculative and lack empirical support. The article also criticizes Sider's tendency to amalgamate disparate paranormal phenomena, including deities, fairies, demons, spirits, and aliens, into a single, unified principle, which the author deems a form of intellectual overreach and potentially indicative of paranoia.

Furthermore, Sider's assertion that landing traces are never identical and that no unknown materials are found at landing sites is challenged. The article references the work of Ted Phillips, which suggests recurring trace configurations and physico-chemical anomalies at landing sites. The notion that aliens might subsist on human emotions is also dismissed as biologically implausible, suggesting a lack of evolutionary sophistication for such beings.

The 'Orthoteny' Hypothesis

A significant portion of the issue is dedicated to the concept of 'orthoteny,' the idea that UFO sightings, when plotted geographically, form straight lines and right angles. The article acknowledges Aimé Michel's earlier, flawed work on this subject, which was based on simplistic plotting and ignored the dynamic nature of UFOs. However, it then presents the work of Raymond Terrasse, who, using more reliable data and precise mapping (1:200,000 scale), has identified numerous straight-line alignments of UFO landing sites and other significant locations.

Didier Charnay, the author of this section, validates Terrasse's findings by applying the same methodology to 'sites alpha' – natural and megalithic sites like menhirs and dolmens, as well as camping sites. He demonstrates that these sites also form significant alignments, particularly along a 'Méridien Lumineux' (Luminous Meridian) identified by Guy Gruais and Guy Mouny. Charnay concludes that orthoteny is a valid concept, suggesting that UFOs might be leaving mathematical proofs of their existence. He posits that the alignment of camping sites, while seemingly mundane, further supports the idea that these locations might hold significance, perhaps as landing sites.

Critique of Debunking and 'Socio-Psychology'

Jean Sider returns in a section titled 'Open Letter to "Socio-Psycho"' to critique the prevailing 'socio-psychological' approach to UFO phenomena. He argues that this perspective, often promoted by psychologists and sociologists, unfairly labels witnesses and researchers as pathological and dismisses the physical reality of UFOs. Sider highlights the work of Jean-Jacques Velasco, head of SEPRA (CNES Toulouse), who asserts that confirmed UFO sightings by radar remain constant and that physical evidence exists, directly contradicting the debunking narrative.

Sider also references a report commissioned by Laurence Rockefeller and an article in VSD magazine, both of which acknowledge the existence of physical evidence related to UFOs, including authenticated photos, radar echoes, ground traces, and electrical disturbances. He criticizes debunkers like Pierre Lagrange, alleging that they are paid by institutions, including universities, to discredit UFO research. Sider cites an informant from the French Ministry of the Interior who claims that research into UFOs was once taken seriously by the CNRS but is now suppressed, with efforts made to dismiss new findings as mere misinterpretations. He also mentions an informant who suggests that a French academic known for disinformation is supported by a US government agency.

Sider concludes by urging 'socio-psychologists' to exercise restraint and respect towards witnesses and researchers, or to withdraw from the field. He suggests that the 'socio-psychological' approach has run its course and is no longer relevant in the face of growing evidence for the physical reality of UFOs.

Other Articles and Themes

Another article, 'When Disinformation Rhymes with Money (Part 2),' by Jean Sider, continues his exposé on the financial motivations behind debunking efforts. He details how publications allegedly pay writers to produce biased articles that ridicule UFO phenomena. Sider shares information from Jean-Luc Rivera, a researcher based in New York, who claims that Pierre Lagrange admitted to being paid by a university to debunk UFOs. Rivera's account is corroborated by Bernard Thouanel, editor of VSD's UFO special issue, who also heard similar claims about Lagrange's paid disinformation activities.

The magazine also includes a brief reflection by Jean-Louis Decanis on 'Hebrew-speaking Extraterrestrials.' Decanis discusses a poster featuring the Kabbalistic Tree of Life (Sephiroth) in the context of crop circles, questioning whether such symbols could originate from extraterrestrials or if they represent a universal mystical concept. He notes that the Sephiroth represent the totality of God's universe and are central to Jewish cosmology.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The issue consistently promotes the idea that UFO phenomena are real, physical, and not merely psychological illusions. There is a strong anti-debunking stance, with a focus on exposing alleged financial incentives behind disinformation campaigns. The magazine champions scientific rigor in studying UFOs, emphasizing the importance of physical evidence and challenging reductionist explanations. The concept of evolution, particularly the idea of a 'superhuman emergence,' is presented as a framework for understanding humanity's place in a potentially conscious universe, suggesting that UFO phenomena might be related to this broader evolutionary process. The editorial stance is one of advocating for a more open-minded and comprehensive approach to ufology, one that integrates paranormal and potentially extraterrestrial aspects without resorting to simplistic dismissals.

This issue of UFO LOG, number 05, dated October 1998, features a critical and analytical approach to ufology, with a strong emphasis on debunking perceived errors and misinterpretations within the field. The cover headline, 'ON RIGOLE PLUS! IL N'Y A PAS QUE FACTEUR X QUI DECONNE PARFOIS.', by Claude MAUGE, sets a tone of critical examination.

Article: 'IL N'Y A PAS QUE FACTEUR X QUI DECONNE PARFOIS.' by Claude MAUGE

Claude Mauge's lengthy article is a direct response to criticisms and statements made by Michel Picard in previous issues of UFO LOG. Mauge begins by asserting his right to express his opinions, mirroring what he perceives as Picard's own stance. He criticizes Picard for misunderstanding his earlier points, particularly regarding 'socio-psychological hypotheses.' Mauge argues that Picard's critique of 'Factor X' is flawed because 'Factor X' is presented as a commercial magazine that capitalizes on the paranormal, similar to how 'Science & Vie' might use UFOs for cover stories. Mauge also points out that Picard found one of his texts from 'Inforespace' interesting, suggesting that Picard himself might sometimes acknowledge valid points from those he criticizes, thus questioning Picard's own 'paternalistic' and dismissive approach.

Mauge then dissects Picard's interpretation of a survey by sociologist Ron Westrum concerning scientists' views on UFOs. Mauge highlights two errors in Picard's presentation: first, a mistranslation or misidentification of the 'American Astronomical Society' as the 'Société Aéronautique Américaine,' and second, a misinterpretation of the survey itself, which was conducted among readers of 'Industrial Research and Development,' not necessarily all scientists.

Mauge further criticizes Picard's handling of Jean-Jacques Velasco's statements, accusing Picard of misrepresenting Velasco's views on French UFO cases. Mauge asserts that Velasco mentioned two cases as examples, not as the only 'real' French cases, and that the GEPAN (now SEPRA) had a significant percentage of cases classified as 'D' (unidentified).

Mauge also touches upon the work of Rémy Chauvin, suggesting that Chauvin, despite his criticisms, might have some affinity for the sociology of science. He questions Picard's assertion that UFOs have escaped scientific definition for half a century, contrasting it with the efforts of scientists at Pocantice and the ongoing research at Hessdalen. Mauge defends the work of Pierre Guérin and Aimé Michel, suggesting Picard's criticisms are unfounded.

Finally, Mauge addresses allegations of 'state debunking' by GEPAN/SEPRA, calling them baseless. He notes that Velasco, while not necessarily validating UFOs as extraterrestrial, has publicly acknowledged the existence of real UFOs and the possibility of unknown material objects, as stated at a conference in Paris.

Article: 'LE MYSTERE DU POT-AU-NOIR.' by Jean-Paul RONECKER

This extensive article investigates the persistent mysteries surrounding the 'Pot-au-Noir' region in Auvergne, France, often referred to as the 'Triangle de la Burle,' drawing parallels to the Bermuda Triangle. The area has been associated with numerous unexplained phenomena for centuries.

Historical Incidents:

• 1420: A 'fireball' was observed over Puy, moving towards Pot-au-Noir. Later that year, a luminous apparition was seen coming from the same area.
• 1518: A luminous sphere or 'fireball' was reported above Mont Mézenc.
• 1579: A 'star' fell near Pot-au-Noir.
• 1806: A mysterious luminous phenomenon that set the sky ablaze was recorded.
• 1911: During an air meeting, aviator Védrines' plane experienced severe turbulence, and another aviator, Biélovuci, reported being drawn by a mysterious current, narrowly avoiding a crash.
• 1943: A British Halifax bomber crashed near Pot-au-Noir after its engines inexplicably failed.
• 1946: An American plane, reportedly carrying a relative of John F. Kennedy, crashed in the Triangle de la Burle.
• 1954: An unidentified luminous object was seen flying over Puy.
• 1963: An English plane crashed on a village.
• 1968: A 'fireball' was seen near the mountain, and two French F104 jets crashed after an apparent mid-air collision.
• 1969: A Fouga Magister jet crashed near Pot-au-Noir, with witnesses reporting luminous objects. Later that year, a Mystère IV jet lost control and crashed, killing a gendarme, after encountering a luminous 'cloud.' An Aero-Commander also disappeared over the area.
• 1971: A Nord-262 crashed, killing high-ranking military officers and scientists.
• 1972: A tourist plane exploded, and a Regent aircraft disappeared.
• 1974: A Jodel aircraft crashed, killing the pilot and three passengers, shortly after reporting a strange luminous object.
• 1975: Luminous objects were seen, and an OVNI landing with a small being emerging was reported.
• 1978: The 30th victim of the Pot-au-Noir was recorded with another plane crash.
• 1980: A Kuwaiti military plane crashed, followed by the crash of a twin-engine aircraft.
• 1994: A commercial airliner crew reported a luminous 'mist' over Mont Mézenc, prompting the pilot to divert.

The article suggests that while some incidents might be accidental, the sheer number and the recurring nature of unexplained events, often involving engine failures or loss of control coinciding with luminous phenomena, point towards a deeper, possibly non-conventional cause. The author concludes that the mystery of the 'Pot-au-Noir' remains unresolved.

Article: 'CHRONIQUES DE L'AILLEURS' by Jean-Paul RONECKER

This section presents a collection of unusual and unexplained phenomena that are often linked to UFOs or similar anomalous events.

'La couleur tombée du ciel' (The Color Fallen from the Sky)

• July 22, 1955 (Cincinnati, Ohio): Ed Mootz experienced a rain of oily, red, hot liquid that killed plants and caused burns. US Air Force investigators collected samples but did not release conclusions.

'D'étranges substances venues du ciel' (Strange Substances from the Sky)

• February 1958 (Westmeath, Ireland): A light streak fell from the sky, leaving behind a gelatinous mass.
• October 10, 1962 (Montreal): Fibrous white filaments, described as strong and unknown, were observed on a ship's railing and then disappeared.
• October 1820 (Pernambouc, Brazil): An 'event' produced a shower of silky substance over a large area.
• May 15, 1800 (Messignadi, Italy): A substance resembling fresh blood fell, later confirmed by laboratory analysis.
• January 21, 1803 (Silésie): A 'meteorite' fell, leaving behind a gelatinous mass in the snow.

'Météo en folie' (Mad Weather)

• October 1886 (Charlotte, North Carolina): A localized waterfall occurred for three weeks, even on clear days, in a specific spot.
• Sunday of Trinity, 1908 (Saint-Etienne-les-Remiremont, Vosges): Hailstones fell, some bearing a clear imprint resembling the Virgin Mary, despite the hailstones themselves being unusually light and not causing significant damage to surrounding areas.
• November 1958 (Alexandria, Louisiana): Rain fell for two hours on a small area from a clear sky, an event that local weather stations and the nearby air base could not explain.
• Late 19th Century (Dawson, Georgia): A similar phenomenon of localized rain occurred.
• November 10, 1819 (Montreal): Dark clouds, unusual sunlight colors, and intermittent darkness accompanied by celestial lights and seismic tremors occurred over the city.

'Boucherie céleste' (Celestial Butchery)

• March 3, 1876 (Olympia Springs, Kentucky): Pieces of meat, identified as possibly lung tissue from children or animals, fell from a clear sky over a specific area. The explanation offered involved vultures, but the quantity and circumstances were questioned.

'Merveilleuse apparition' (Marvelous Apparition)

• Date unspecified (Ballarvade, Massachusetts): Dr. Ralph Harlow and his wife reported hearing disembodied voices and then witnessing six beautiful, luminous young women floating in the air, engaged in conversation with a 'young spirit.' The beings eventually disappeared.

The section concludes by noting that while some events might have mundane explanations, the accumulation of such unusual occurrences, often coinciding with UFO sightings, suggests a pattern of unexplained phenomena that challenges conventional understanding.

Erratum

An erratum corrects the spelling of the artist's name 'Guillaume Kerlorc'h' to 'Guillaume Kerloc'h' for drawings published in a previous issue.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently explores unexplained phenomena, UFO sightings, and related mysteries, often presenting detailed case studies and historical accounts. There is a clear critical stance towards simplistic debunking and a willingness to investigate anomalous events that defy conventional scientific explanation. The editorial stance appears to favor open-minded inquiry into the paranormal and UFOlogy, while also engaging in critical analysis of claims made within the field, as exemplified by Mauge's article. The magazine seems to aim at providing a platform for diverse perspectives on these topics, encouraging readers to question established narratives and consider alternative possibilities.

This issue of UFO LOG, dated October 1998, is primarily dedicated to a comprehensive review of books, magazines, comic books, and CD-ROMs related to ufology and the paranormal. The 'Livres' and 'Revue de Presse' sections offer detailed critiques and summaries of various publications, providing readers with an extensive bibliography and current awareness of the field.

Books Reviewed

The 'Livres' section highlights several notable publications. 'Le Secret des Mondes Parallèles' by Lucien Liroy is described as a study of parallel and mental universes, cautioning against non-human influences. 'Le Dossier 1954 et l'Imposture Rationaliste' by Jean Sider is presented as an in-depth examination of the 1954 French UFO wave, challenging debunking theories. 'Enquête sur les Insaisissables, Tome I' by Fabrice Kircher and Dominique Becker is reviewed as a scientific approach to ufology, exploring esoteric themes and proposing a new theory of parasitosis. The issue also features reviews of English-language books such as 'How to Defend Yourself Against Alien Abduction' by Ann Druffel, 'The Science of Aliens' by Clifford Pickover, and 'Alien Base' by Timothy Good, noting their content on alien encounters, exobiology, and government complicity.

Magazine Reviews ('Revue de Presse')

The 'Revue de Presse' section provides a detailed overview of numerous periodicals. 'Visions du Futur' is reviewed for its articles on cases like Hopkinsville, UFO sightings in Papua New Guinea, and cattle mutilations. 'Dossier Brûlant #1' is introduced as a new controversial topic magazine focusing on UFOs. 'VSD' is noted for its articles on reasons to believe in UFOs and scientific evidence. 'L'Inconnu' covers UFO effects in England. 'Science Frontières' features a letter from Jean-Pierre Tennevin and an article on archaeoastronomy. 'Anomalies' dedicates its issue to the Roswell case. 'UFO Newsletter' offers a variety of topics including the Ardennes UFO, Colonel Corso, and Area 51. 'Ufomania' celebrates its fifth anniversary with dossiers on positive alien contacts and Argentina. 'Sentinel News' is highlighted for its exobiology coverage and a piece on the Pocantico conference.

Comic Books and CD-ROMs

Comic book reviews include 'The Minx', a Vertigo collection about a girl with an alien heritage; 'Mr. Grey', a parody about an alien integrating into an American family; 'American Woman', a series featuring ETs attacking New York; and 'The Supernaturals', a horror comic with characters inspired by Chupacabras. CD-ROM reviews cover 'Rêves de Mars', an interactive exploration of the planet Mars, and 'Sightings UFOpedia', an English CD-ROM on ufology. 'Left at East Gate' is a CD-ROM detailing the Rendlesham incident.

UFO Merchandise

A section on UFO merchandise lists various items such as card games ('Abduction'), T-shirts featuring Marvin the Martian, and a 'Roswell Alien Skull' statue. It also mentions caps and other collectibles.

Letters to the Editor

A lengthy letter from Michel Picard to Didier Charnay is featured, where Picard defends his stance against 'sociopsychos' and 'debunkers'. He criticizes their reductionist approach to ufology and argues for a more open-minded investigation of phenomena, referencing research by Ron Westrum.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The issue consistently emphasizes the importance of critical research and detailed analysis in ufology. It showcases a wide range of publications, from academic studies to popular magazines, suggesting a broad interest in the subject. The editorial stance appears to favor in-depth investigation and challenges simplistic explanations, as evidenced by the reviews and Michel Picard's letter. There's a clear effort to provide readers with resources for further study and to engage with different perspectives within the ufological community.

Title: UFO LOG
Issue: #05
Date: October 1998
Publisher: association Nexus
Country: France
Language: French

This issue of UFO LOG features a robust 'Courrier des lecteurs' (Reader Mail) section, a section for 'Petites Annonces' (Small Ads), and information regarding the magazine's contact details and copyright. The cover prominently displays artwork and text related to 'FANTASTIC 1950s EC COMICS!', specifically highlighting 'WEIRD SCIENCE-FANTASY' and its 'FLYING SAUCER REPORT' which is described as 'ILLUSTRATED, FACTUAL' and 'DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE!'.

Courrier des lecteurs (Reader Mail)

Letter from E. Maillot

E. Maillot responds to a previous letter from M. Picard, engaging in a detailed critique of Picard's arguments, particularly concerning UFO statistics and the identification of phenomena. Maillot challenges Picard's methodology, suggesting that Picard avoids statistical arguments he doesn't master and dismisses those who disagree as 'ignorant' or 'terriers'. Maillot points out that Picard seems to hide behind the name 'Westrum' in his response, despite Westrum's study being less rigorous than Maillot's own, which is based on 200 published UFO cases (125 with distance data) identified as lunar misidentifications. Maillot criticizes Westrum's study for not distinguishing between twilight and night observations and for not accounting for time zone differences within the USA. Maillot also accuses Picard of distorting Westrum's statements and criticizes his preference for monologue over debate, suggesting that Picard's books, despite being advertised in UFO LOG, are not open to contestation.

Maillot also addresses personal remarks, stating that Picard does not know him and is unaware of developments in ufology since 1978, implying that there are more substantial theories beyond the camps of HSP and HET. He humorously refers to seeing and touching 'Père Noël' (Santa Claus) and suggests Picard's 'absurd demonstration' method is being used against him. Maillot concludes by sarcastically recommending Picard's 'metalogical' works as reliable and credible.

Letter from Patrick Fresneau

Patrick Fresneau writes a constructive letter praising the magazine's quality in both content and presentation. He commends UFO LOG for being open to criticism, which he sees as a positive way to evolve. Fresneau suggests that the 'Courrier des lecteurs' section is too long for individual letters but too short in overall content, advocating for more reader interaction through letters discussing articles. He notes that ufologists often get stuck in their own ideas and are quick to criticize opponents. Fresneau also proposes that the magazine should include photographic analyses to help amateur enthusiasts identify potential hoaxes, a suggestion that the editor acknowledges as a good idea but dependent on finding photography specialists.

Editorial Response to Fresneau

The editor includes parenthetical notes within Fresneau's letter, thanking him for the compliments and agreeing that constructive criticism is valuable. The editor also comments on the length of reader letters and the need for more reader participation, noting that some ufologists are too entrenched in their views. Regarding photographic analysis, the editor expresses interest but highlights the need for specialists.

Petites Annonces (Small Ads)

CERAF Announcement

The CERAF (Cercle d'Etude et de Recherche en Archéologie Fantastique), a ufology section, announces its existence and provides a postal address for contact: BP 63, 66380 PIA, France. It lists its President, Jean-Luc Noguera; Vice President, Gilles Hargat; and Honorary President, Florence Pédhelez (granddaughter of Dr. Marcel Pagés, a specialist in antigravitation). The organization extends a warm welcome to interested individuals.

Research Requests from Michel Picard

Michel Picard is seeking specific details for his research:

1. South American Teleportation: Information on a South American teleportation case dated June 9, 1976, involving a 2000 km translation and the subject's disappearance for over a month. The source cited is the collective book 'Demain la Terre' (Tomorrow the Earth), published by Arcturus in 1979.
2. Crusades Events: Historical sources that could accredit miraculous events during the Crusades, specifically those involving 'nacelles' (pods) and knights who mysteriously reappeared in France after being in the Near East, across the Mediterranean Sea. The source mentioned is 'le Guide Tchou de la France Mystérieuse' (The Tchou Guide to Mysterious France).

Interested parties are asked to write to the magazine, which will forward the information.

Letter from Didier Charnay

Didier Charnay expresses his thanks to M. Leclet Renaud and the members of CNEGU for inviting him to their 61st session, which he was unable to attend due to travel constraints. He finds discussions with ufologists constructive and interesting, even when disagreements arise, and hopes to attend in the future.

UFO LOG Investigation Update

Didier Charnay also provides an update on UFO LOG's ongoing investigation into the Voreppe case, stating that it is not yet concluded and will be the subject of an article in a future issue, regardless of the outcome. He requests readers and ufologists to share any press articles or radio/TV segments related to the case that the magazine might have missed, to aid the research.

Call for Information

Charnay further invites readers to inform the magazine about any new cases or any articles from any media that could advance the research and the magazine's investigations.

Cover Art Information

The back cover of this issue is a reproduction of the cover of 'Weird Science-Fantasy #4' (Rush Cochran, 1993), which is a reissue of 'Weird Science-Fantasy #26' from 1954, published by EC Comics. This special issue featured about twenty reconstructions of real UFO sighting testimonies from between 1948 and 1954, including cases like Gorman-Fargo, Mantell, Muroc, Utah, Indianapolis, and Washington.

Information – Contact

UFO LOG's latest issue is #25 (Summer 2011), with a new issue in preparation for 2019. Older issues are still available. The fanzine is published by the association Nexus, c/o Didier Charnay, 2 rue des Chanterelles, 01000 Bourg-en-Bresse, France. The website is www.ufolog.org.

Note Importante (Important Note)

The digital version of UFO LOG is protected by copyright. Internet users have the right to download and store digitized issues in their personal archives but are not permitted to publish them online on any website, blog, forum, or social network. The only authorized online publication is by AFU (Archives for the Unexplained). Any unauthorized digital dissemination is forbidden and may lead to legal proceedings.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue highlights a recurring theme of debate and critical analysis within the ufology community, as evidenced by the detailed reader letters. The editorial stance, as indicated by the responses within the reader mail section and the call for information, is one of openness to constructive criticism and a desire to advance research through shared information and rigorous investigation. The magazine also shows an interest in historical cases and the popular culture representation of UFOs, as seen in the cover art and research requests. The copyright notice emphasizes a controlled approach to digital distribution, prioritizing archival access over widespread online sharing.