UFO Informations - No 18 - 3e trim 1977

Magazine Overview

Title: U.F.O. INFORMATIONS
Issue: N° 18
Publication Date: 3rd Quarter 1977
Publisher: ASSOCIATION DES AMIS DE MARC THIROUIN
Country of Publication: France
Price: 5,00

Editorial: VRAIS ET FAUX CANULARS...

The editorial, titled "VRAIS ET FAUX CANULARS..." (True and False Hoaxes...), delves into the inherent paradox of ufology: the difficulty in establishing certainty from dubious cases. It posits that the field relies on witness testimony, despite its known flaws. The author argues that even seemingly clear evidence can fade with time and intermediaries, and that the consistency of a narrative can erode under scrutiny. The editorial discusses the challenge of verifying accounts, especially when witnesses are deceased, leaving historical critique to piece together evidence. It suggests that a cynical approach might conclude ufology is built on cases yet to be debunked, yet maintains that the phenomenon, as a whole, exists despite individual case flaws. The author proposes that a rigorous investigator, after examining numerous cases, might be led to consider them all as dubious, but ultimately must conclude that the phenomenon itself is real. The piece references Michel Carrouges's assertion that one cannot dismiss the entire phenomenon without temerity, even if individual cases are questionable. It also touches upon Claude Poher's statistics, suggesting correlations exist independently of specific testimonies.

The editorial criticizes the tendency to dismiss cases based on preconceived notions or partial information, contrasting the approach of a true Cartesian skeptic with a 'counterfeit' one who readily accepts arguments for falsity. It notes that investigators who publish 'debunking' articles gain more publicity than those who investigate unknown cases. The piece also addresses the common explanations for UFOs, such as 'Mantell pursuing the planet Venus,' and the desire for more serious validation. It laments that while it's common to denounce publications claiming events are true, there's a greater leniency towards those claiming events are false. The author then revisits the M. Dulecki observation in Saint-Just-de-Claix, which was reported as a hoax by the magazine OURANOS. The editorial points out flaws in OURANOS's counter-investigation, particularly the argument that a peasant cutting vines at night would not have noticed anything unusual, questioning the logic of such an activity in the dark. It highlights the A.A.M.T.'s own investigations into the case, noting the partiality of arguments presented by a monsieur who claimed to have heard the witness for five hours, when the witness spoke for less than 50 minutes. The editorial concludes that many cases go unreported because they are deemed not 'credible' by some authority, and that the true reasons for this dismissal are unknown.

Dossier Observations

This section compiles various UFO sightings and observations from different locations.

UN OVNI A POULLAQUEN

A witness driving at night in Poullaouen reported seeing headlights that moved from the road into a field. He then observed a luminous object, described as a pole about ten meters high with a pointed top, surrounded by a swirling halo of different colors. The object illuminated the entire valley and then ascended vertically into the sky and disappeared. Another witness, Suzanne Floch, also saw the luminous mass from a different location, initially mistaking it for a car on a road that did not exist at that spot. The witness, M. Tallec, who does not believe in UFOs, returned to the site the next day but found no traces, stating he could not explain what he saw.

WAMBEZ: ETRANGES BRULURES CIRCULAIRES DANS UN CHAMP D'ESCOURGEON OU DES TRACES TRIANGULAIRES ONT ETE RELEVEES.

An anonymous farmer from Wambez reported a peculiar incident where a mysterious object landed in his field, burning a circular area of approximately 80 m² in the eschscholtzia crop. Triangular imprints were also found on the ground. The possibility of a helicopter causing this was considered, but the carbonization of the soil was questioned. A second, smaller circular burn occurred in the same field a few days later.

D'autres observations dans l'Oise:

• Cirès-lès-Mello: In February, M.C. Heuzé observed three powerful lights with halos, which descended towards the ground and then rose into the air.
• M. Arcade Champion: This witness reported observing a formation of six circular objects flying in formation from East to West on several occasions during the winter evenings. These objects emitted a bright white light.

UN OBJET LUMINEUX DANS LE CIEL DE ROMANS.

In Romans, a luminous white ball, described as the size of a tennis ball, was seen in the sky, followed by a long trail of the same color. It moved at low altitude. The son of a local doctor also observed the phenomenon.

PARAY LEMONIAL (71)

Between July 1st and 7th, 1977, six children in Paray-le-Monial reported seeing a 'neon white' ball emerge from a cloud at an altitude of 2000m. The object ascended vertically and disappeared. A second ball performed a similar maneuver a few minutes later.

MARTIENS EN TENUE D'ADAM..

A farmer near Toul reported seeing two beings dressed in 'Adam's attire' descend from a helicopter that landed in a field. He believes this was a UFO.

COLOMBIE..

Several UFOs reportedly caused panic in the village of Socorro, Colombia. Witnesses described flying saucers emitting red and white flashes as they flew over the village at low altitude.

TUES PAR LES OVNI?

The mysterious death of fifteen ponies in Cornwall is attributed to UFOs. The ponies' bones and ribs were broken, and their flesh decomposed rapidly. A British UFO club president suggested that the ponies were crushed by the anti-gravity field of a flying saucer and is searching for evidence.

LES EQUIPAGES D'OVNI COMPRENNENT L'ESPAGNOL

The Bermuda Triangle Incident: A Colombian cargo plane pilot, Camilo Barrios, reported being escorted by a circular object emitting orange and red lights over the Bermuda Triangle. The object seemed to understand Spanish and responded to the pilot's request to ascend by doing so, then descending again. The pilot invited the object to confirm its observation.

OVNI SUR PALMA DE MAJORQUE:

An unidentified flying object remained stationary for thirty minutes over Palma de Majorque. Witnesses described it as an 'enormous star,' and photographs were taken. After half an hour, it began to move northwest and disappeared.

MEXICO: EXPLOSION D'UN OVNI:

In Mexico City, a UFO reportedly exploded after being pursued by two other unidentified aircraft. The event was witnessed by dozens of people. The object, initially moving in a straight line, was flanked by two smaller objects. It then burst into a bright, rounded mass that transformed into four smaller objects which dispersed into space.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue of UFO Informations strongly emphasizes the critical analysis of UFO evidence, particularly the challenges posed by witness testimony and the potential for hoaxes. The editorial advocates for rigorous investigation while acknowledging the existence of the phenomenon. The recurring theme is the compilation of diverse UFO sightings from various locations, presented with details of the observations, witness accounts, and, where available, newspaper sources. The magazine appears to adopt a stance of open inquiry, encouraging contributions from readers and aiming to inform the public about UFO phenomena, while maintaining a critical perspective on the evidence presented. The publication is associated with the "Association des Amis de Marc Thirouin" and the "Commission d'Enquêtes sur les O.V.N.I.", indicating a focus on investigative ufology.

This issue of 'OVNI' magazine, identified as issue number 8 and dated August 19, 1977, primarily focuses on UFO (Unidentified Flying Object) sightings and related phenomena. The publication appears to be a French magazine, as indicated by the language and the origin of some cited sources.

Recent Sightings

OVNI Normand

The lead story details a sighting in Houetteville, Eure, Normandy, France. A doctor and his friend observed a silent, cigar-shaped craft on two occasions: the night of August 6-7 and again between August 13-14. The craft left behind physical evidence: three holes forming a perfect triangle, each side measuring 8 meters, and several square meters of burnt grass around the site.

Italian Sightings

Two reports from Italy are included:

• Near Avellino: Seven people reported seeing an extraterrestrial being over two meters tall, wearing a luminous helmet, and traveling in a spatial craft. The landing site was marked by three holes forming a perfect isosceles triangle.
• Novare Province: Residents near Lake Maggiore reported seeing strongly illuminated flying objects at night. Multiple villages provided similar testimonies: the objects moved in zig-zags, stopped intermittently, and emitted red, blue, green, and yellow lights.

Historical Accounts

The magazine delves into historical records, citing the Bulletin of the Departmental Society of Archaeology and Statistics of the Drôme, to present older accounts that might be interpreted as UFO sightings:

• 1774: A phenomenon described as 'globular lightning' occurred in St-Paul-trois-Châteaux, enveloping a man and leaving no odor. Later that month, an oblique light trace was observed, followed by a luminous meteor resembling a comet with a tail, accompanied by thunder and smoke.
• 1774: A 'fiery serpent' with a vast surface area was seen between Lyon and Grenoble, remaining stationary for two minutes before disappearing, leaving behind twinkling stars.
• 1596: A 'hairy star' was observed for eight days, causing astonishment.
• 1597: A 'flamboyant star' appeared, accompanied by thunder, and was visible with great clarity.
• 1603: A 'sign in the sky' at St-Antoine, described as a reflection or reverberation, appeared like white and red lances.

These historical accounts are presented to show how phenomena, possibly meteoric or atmospheric, were perceived and recorded in the past, sometimes being admitted into chronicles that might now be considered outside the realm of conventional science.

Scientific and Ufological Perspectives

The issue includes various sections discussing the broader context of UFO research and related topics:

Interviews and Opinions

• Rémy Chauvin: Interviewed by the press, he discusses his experiences and disappointments, noting that scientists, despite their power, are still human. His ideal of science is the pursuit of adventure, mystery, and the unknown.
• Alchemists: A report from 'LE MONDE' suggests that alchemists are being taken seriously, indicating a re-evaluation of historical esoteric practices.
• MHD (Magneto-Hydro-Dynamics): An article from 'Les Nouvelles de Moscou' highlights the importance of MHD as a future energy source.
• Lucid Hypnosis: Dr. Paul Chauchard discusses lucid hypnosis, emphasizing that true connection with others requires confidence and lucidity, not just willpower.
• Yetis and Wild Men: An article in 'LA RECHERCHE' presents information on creatures like Yetis, distinguishing them from UFO occupants.
• Alfred Russel Wallace: An examination of the work of Alfred Russel Wallace, co-discoverer of the theory of evolution, and his connection to spiritualism.
• Italian Spiritism: A series of articles in 'GENTE' explores spiritism, vocal analysis, and mediumship, suggesting potential scientific investigation into these phenomena.
• OMNI (Unidentified Marine Objects): Scandinavian military forces are intrigued by mysterious objects in the deep waters of fjords, with recent operations yielding no results.
• 30 Years of Flying Saucers: A reminder that the UFO phenomenon is not new, referencing Kenneth Arnold's 1947 sighting and an upcoming international congress in Chicago.
• Ufology in Italy: A review of an Italian ufology congress, noting its limited participation but highlighting the interest in the subject.
• OVNI Groups in Southeast France: A report on an initiative by UFO groups to contact the Secretary of State for Research.
• 'Aerial Corridor' in Oise: Several testimonies from the Oise region suggest a potential 'aerial corridor' for UFOs.
• Message to Extraterrestrials: The 'Voyager' space probe carrying a message from humanity is discussed, with a critical view on the American president's initiative compared to more pressing earthly issues.
• Israeli Protection by UFOs: M. Robert Barry, director of the 'Bureau des OVNI', claims that Israel is protected by UFOs sent by God and angels, citing their presence during past wars.
• GEPAN: The creation of the 'Groupe d'Etudes des Phénomènes Aérospatiaux Non identifiés' (GEPAN) is announced, with Claude Poher heading the group under CNES. The article references the Condon Report, noting that while most UFO cases are explainable, 10% remain mysterious.

Book Reviews and Bulletins

The magazine lists numerous books and bulletins related to ufology, parapsychology, astrology, and other related fields, including:

• Books on Kabbalah, hypnosis, clairvoyance, French magical history, the Bermuda Triangle, astrology, mental dynamics, Nazca lines, and animal behavior.
• A new collection titled 'COLLECTION PSI' covering telepathy, PK effects, and altered states of consciousness.
• A section on parapsychology, the unknown host in crime, chance and infinity, and extraterrestrials.
• A list of received reviews and bulletins from various ufological organizations in France, Belgium, Australia, the UK, and Canada, detailing articles on UFO traces, sightings, humanoids, and related topics.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently explores the unexplained, presenting both contemporary sightings and historical accounts that could be interpreted as UFO phenomena. There's a clear interest in scientific investigation, with interviews featuring researchers and scientists, while also acknowledging the limitations of current scientific understanding in explaining all observed events. The editorial stance appears to be one of open inquiry, encouraging the study of these phenomena, even those that fall outside conventional scientific paradigms. The inclusion of historical records suggests a belief that UFOs are not a new phenomenon but have been observed throughout history, albeit under different interpretations. The magazine also touches upon related fields like parapsychology, spiritism, and astrology, indicating a broad interest in the paranormal and unexplained.

This issue of UFO-JOURNAL, dated January to March 1977, focuses on the scientific exploration of Unidentified Flying Objects (UFOs), particularly examining hypothetical propulsion systems and the challenges of studying such phenomena. The magazine reviews several related publications and research groups, providing a snapshot of ufological activity and thought in the mid-1970s.

UFO-JOURNAL Reviews

The issue begins with a listing of recent UFO-JOURNAL publications from MUFON, detailing specific articles such as 'The Stanford Abduction' (Issue 110, January 1977), a UFO observed from a police helicopter (Issue 111, February 1977), and 'The Wilson Lake Humanoid' (Issue 112, March 1977). It also mentions JUFORA, the Japan UFO Research Association, and its publication (No. 20).

Several other organizations and their publications are highlighted:

• VERONICA (Nîmes, France): Group VERONICA, covering its activities, press reviews, ufological addresses, and humorous content (No. 8, 2nd quarter 1977).
• PARAPSYCHOLOGIE - INSOLITE - DIVERS: This section lists several publications:
• RENAITRE 2000 (Dammartine en Goële, France): Focusing on parapsychology, with issues from January/February, March/April, and May/June/July 1977.
• PESQUISA (Brasilia DF, Brazil): The Brazilian Association for Research and Culture, covering UFOs/Civilizations (Vol. 1, No. 1).
• LA TRIBUNE PSYCHIQUE (Paris, France): Parapsychology publication (3rd quarter 1977).
• LA REVUE DU MAGNETISME ET DU PSYCHISME EXPERIMENTAL (Lille, France): Parapsychology publication (No. 16, July/August 1977).
• SIECLE INCONNU: Bulletin from GEPO, featuring special UFO issues (No. 7, May/June 1977) and OVNI-INFO (No. 8, September/October 1977).
• KADATH (Brussels, Belgium): A publication covering UFOs and Carnac (No. 24, August/September/October 1977).
• L'AUTRE MONDE (Paris, France): Articles on 'The Rays of Fear (UFO)' (No. 10) and 'Humanoid Photos' (No. 11).
• PILOTE PRIVE: Aviation-related articles on 'Birth of the Extra-Terrestrial Hypothesis', 'The Crazy Year (1954)', and 'Crazy Work for a Crazy Year (1954)' (Nos. 43-45).
• SURVIOLOGIE: Bulletin from GIRS, focusing on ecology (No. 4).
• BULLETIN DU GAPRA: Astronomy publication (No. 8, August 1977).

Page 19 offers recommendations for the quarter, highlighting INFO-OVNI's special archives issue on whether UFO occupants are generally humanoids. It also points to KADATH No. 24 for a special on Carnac.

"Two Hypotheses for UFOs" by Jean GOUPIL

The core of the issue is an article by Jean GOUPIL, an engineer and ufologist since 1962, presenting two hypotheses for UFO phenomena. The article is prefaced by an introduction by Jean-Claude BOURRET, who describes GOUPIL as a 'sympathetic bearded man with laughing eyes and an intelligent gaze.' GOUPIL's work is presented as a continuation of BOURRET's earlier book, "La Nouvelle Vague des Soucoupes Volantes."

GOUPIL recounts his involvement with ufology and his participation in conferences and presentations, including one with BOURRET in November 1976 for researchers in Paris. He notes that his association, A.A.M.T., had been preparing to publish an article on his research into hypothetical UFO propulsion systems.

Fantastic UFOs

GOUPIL begins by addressing the scientific challenge posed by UFO testimonies, which often describe incredible phenomena: craft with impossible accelerations, supersonic speeds without noise, right-angle turns, invisibility, emission of light rays, and occupants unaffected by bullets or paralysis. He acknowledges the scientific community's difficulty in accepting such reports, often dismissing them as 'impossible' rather than 'unbelievable.' He argues against abandoning scientific inquiry, suggesting that intelligence might be impermeable to certain concepts, but that attempts to understand must be made.

Researching Future Technologies

GOUPIL proposes a methodology for advancing UFO research, which involves:

1. Assuming a new property of matter: This hypothetical property would be explored within the limits of current physics, particularly conservation laws.
2. Adopting a 'future technician's' mindset: Imagining the practical applications of this discovery.
3. Drawing parallels with UFO testimonies: Using alleged UFO effects as potential clues to confirm or refute hypotheses.
4. Selecting the most probable hypothesis: Based on simplicity, minimal contradiction with existing principles, technological plausibility, and explanatory power for 'cursed facts' (unexplained phenomena).

He acknowledges that absolute certainty is impossible as UFOs are not reproducible in a laboratory, but emphasizes the value of such research in better understanding UFOs and potentially revealing new avenues of knowledge.

The Repulsive Field Hypothesis

GOUPIL then details his primary hypothesis: the "repulsive field." This concept, previously explored in "PHENOMENES SPATIAUX" (Issues 11 and 14), posits that a device called a "repulsor" can generate a field that repels any mass M with a force F proportional to M and the field's intensity. This is presented as being consistent with Newton's third law (action-reaction), unlike some earlier antigravitation theories.

Practical Applications of the Repulsive Field:

• Propulsion: The field can generate significant forces, especially near large masses. For example, a field equivalent to one-hundredth of Earth's gravity over a 10-meter cube could produce a reaction force of 20 tons. This could explain the rapid vertical ascents and 'dead leaf' descents reported in UFO sightings.
• Aerodynamics: The repulsor can create a partial vacuum around the UFO, pushing air molecules away from its path. This would result in:
• Absence of noise and shockwaves: Air layers would glide smoothly, preventing abrupt velocity changes.
• Absence of heating: The repulsive field would prevent air molecules from reaching the craft's surface at high speeds, thus bypassing the 'thermal barrier.'

GOUPIL also discusses the optimal shape for a UFO utilizing such a repulsor, suggesting a cone trunk with a dome or mast, noting that this shape is illogical from a conventional aerodynamic standpoint but matches some authentic UFO photographs.

Calculations and Observations:

The calculation shows a direct relationship between the maximum speed permitted by a repulsive field and the quality of the partial vacuum achieved. For instance, a speed limit of 3600 km/h corresponds to a vacuum of 1.9 mm of mercury, dropping to 0.2 mm for 4200 km/h. Furthermore, UFOs are known to emit electromagnetic radiation that can interfere with radio and television. These emissions, at specific vacuum levels (around 2 mm Hg), can produce red glows that turn blue-white as pressure decreases (around 0.2 mm Hg). This phenomenon aligns with numerous testimonies describing UFOs with changing colored lights.

Figure 1 illustrates the repulsive field hypothesis, showing a source of energy powering a repulsor that generates a field.

Figure 2 depicts propulsion via 'repulsors,' showing how they create a partial vacuum around the craft. It suggests that if R1 (inner radius) is smaller than R2, R3, and R4 (outer radii), propulsion occurs.

Figure 3 illustrates the shape of a UFO receiving a rarefied air flux at its speed limit, with the field assumed to be constant within a sphere.

Figure 4 plots the relationship between residual pressure and speed limit, showing the pressure levels at which luminous effects (red, blue, blue-white) occur.

UFOs at Sea

GOUPIL questions why repulsors couldn't be used for underwater travel. He cites a significant case from Jacques Vallée's "Chronique des apparitions extra-terrestres" (Case No. 519): on June 3, 1961, near Savona, Italy, four people in a boat witnessed the sea swell, and a brilliant object emerged, rose 10 meters, and departed at high speed. The object was described as a cone on a disc.

UFO Invisibility

Another consequence of the repulsive field is the potential for invisibility. The difference in refractive index between the atmosphere and the partial vacuum can create mirages, similar to heat haze on roads. In the case of UFOs, this difference is more significant, potentially making the craft invisible. If the repulsors are activated, the engine might become invisible as the light rays are bent by the vacuum bubble. Even attempts to illuminate such a UFO with a car headlight might fail due to the light beam being curved.

Figure 5 visually explains this phenomenon, showing how an observer sees the sky where the engine should be due to total reflection caused by the refractive index difference between air and the vacuum bubble.

Rapid Departures and Right-Angle Turns

For passengers to fully utilize the capabilities of such an engine, they must withstand significant accelerations. The physiological limit for humans is around 10g, primarily due to the limitations of current acceleration transmission methods (e.g., through seats). GOUPIL proposes a solution using the repulsive field within the cabin. By placing a mosaic of small repulsors behind the passenger, a uniform field can be created that maintains the passenger at a constant distance from the mosaic. This field would only activate during acceleration phases and could be controlled to counteract the G-forces.

Figure 6 illustrates this concept, showing a person standing on a mosaic of repulsors within a cabin, with a 'control mass' and a 'servomechanism loop' to regulate the field. The consequence is the possibility of accelerations reaching 1000g (9810 m/s²) if the field is uniform to within 1%.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The issue strongly advocates for a scientific and methodical approach to studying UFO phenomena, even when faced with seemingly unbelievable testimonies. It emphasizes the importance of developing new theoretical frameworks and technological hypotheses, such as the repulsive field, to explain UFO capabilities. The magazine appears to be open to unconventional ideas but grounds them in physics principles and mathematical calculations. There is a clear stance that scientific inquiry should not be abandoned due to the current lack of understanding or technological limitations. The recurring themes include advanced propulsion, the physics of UFO flight, and the potential for future technologies to explain current mysteries.

This issue of UFO-INFORMATIONS, identified as number 31, focuses on two main areas: a public opinion survey conducted at the Foire de Romans and detailed reports of UFO observations in the Vaison la Romaine region. The magazine delves into the theoretical aspects of UFO construction and includes a satirical comic strip.

Theoretical Discussion: Constructing a UFO

The issue begins with a theoretical exploration of how a UFO might be constructed, based on the principle of a repulsive field. It posits that if the cabin's field is uniform to within 1%, accelerations of 1000g are possible. A simple calculation shows that an immobile UFO subjected to 1000g would travel 1250 meters in 0.5 seconds, reaching 5 km from its starting point in the first second, creating the visual impression of a sudden disappearance. By using internal repulsors to compensate for centrifugal forces during turns, it becomes possible to make a 100-meter radius turn at 1 km/s (3600 km/h) in just 0.16 seconds, explaining the perceived instantaneous turns reported by witnesses. The proposed structure includes an atmospheric repulsor at the top to open a path through the air, which the UFO reportedly tilts to align with its direction of travel at high speeds. Below the disc, three repulsors are installed to balance the force from the upper repulsor. Increasing the field of these three repulsors provides propulsion, with all repulsors oriented outwards to avoid creating a field within the craft. A uniform field mosaic in the cabin is engaged when the speed changes, and braking is achieved by reversing the UFO or using an opposing mosaic.

Survey at the Foire de Romans

A significant portion of the magazine is dedicated to the results of a survey conducted at the Foire de Romans (Drôme) from September 25 to October 3, 1976. 185 people completed the questionnaire, with a majority of men (150) compared to women (35). The age distribution of respondents was: 3 (under 10), 46 (10-18), 85 (18-30), 46 (30-60), and 5 (over 60).

The survey asked participants about their beliefs regarding extraterrestrial life, ufology, and the existence of UFOs. Key questions and their aggregated results (Oui/Non/Sans opinion) include:

• Existence of life elsewhere: 128 believed in life in the solar system, 13 did not, and 13 had no opinion. For life in the galaxy, 33 said yes, 66 no, and 40 no opinion.
• Knowledge of ufology: 115 knew what ufology is, 16 did not, and 29 had no opinion.
• Belief in UFOs: 71 believed UFOs exist, 106 did not, and 3 had no opinion.
• Reasons for belief included: 33 thought it was a global psychological phenomenon, 63 a global physical phenomenon unknown to science, 20 secret terrestrial craft, 110 extraterrestrial vehicles, and 42 other origins.
• Information level on UFOs: 42 considered themselves very informed, 51 well-informed, 9 poorly informed, and 19 not informed at all.
• Exposure to UFO literature: 102 had read articles or books on the subject, 71 had not, and 8 had no opinion.
• Title of a UFO book: 101 provided a title, 39 did not, and 41 had no opinion.
• Belief in hidden information: 101 believed something was being hidden, 39 did not, and 41 had no opinion.
• Interest in UFO study: 143 were interested, 17 not, and 11 no opinion.
• Acceptance of dedicating leisure time to UFO study: 93 yes, 55 no, 23 no opinion.
• Desire to join a UFO society: 77 yes, 70 no, and no opinion count provided.
• Knowledge of UFO traces: 142 knew UFOs leave traces, 28 did not, and 14 no opinion.
• Attendance at UFO conferences/expos: 39 had attended, 136 had not, and 2 no opinion.
• Perception of objective information gained: 34 yes, 38 no, 22 no opinion.
• Perception of it being useless: 26 yes, 80 no, 18 no opinion.
• Willingness to report a sighting: 150 would report, 17 would not, and 12 no opinion.
• Belief in links between paranormal phenomena and UFOs: 69 saw a link, 49 did not, and 54 no opinion.
• Knowledge of gendarmerie UFO investigations: 127 knew, 44 did not, and 11 no opinion.

The article concludes that surveys should be treated with caution due to potential lack of sincerity, recent media influence, and the diverse origins of fair attendees. It notes inconsistencies, such as 39 people attending conferences but 94 not being sure if they gained objective information.

Dossier Enquêtes: Observations in Vaison la Romaine

This section details several UFO sightings in the Vaison la Romaine region (Vaucluse) between February and July 1975 and early 1977. The area, defined by Orange, Vaison la Romaine, and Carpentras, has been the site of increasingly precise luminous phenomena.

• February 21, 1977: Mr. Giraud, a computer scientist, observed a large, red-orange luminous ball (described as "4 times the apparent diameter of Venus") emerge from the mountains south-west of Vaison. The object hovered, and Mr. Giraud discerned a "capsule Apollo" shape. An aircraft with delta wings was seen approaching the object, which then accelerated rapidly and disappeared into the clouds. The base at Orange denied any aircraft activity at that time.
• February 23, 1977: Madame Jacumin and her family observed a similar object hovering over Vaison, emitting a bright orange glow and pulsations, causing one child to fear it would explode.
• February 24, 1977: Two witnesses observed four luminous, orange-red objects with erratic, right-angle movements and high acceleration emerging from the "Dentelles de Montmirail" mountains. The objects moved too fast to be aircraft and sometimes stopped before resuming movement.
• February 25, 1977: Following contact with investigators, observations were made in the Vaison area and the triangle formed by Carpentras, Vaison, and Orange. A report from Sorgues mentioned an observation in the direction of the "Dentelles de Montmirail" consistent with previous sightings.
• February 28, 1977: Five objects, similar to those seen on the 24th, were observed. Mr. Giraud reported live to J.P. Troadec as an object moved from Vaison towards Orange and disappeared.
• July 16, 1975: In Vaison, an object with a red-orange trail was observed near Venus, evolving in spirals for 10 minutes. The trail persisted for about 50 seconds and was also observed by the gendarmerie.
• October 9, 1975: In Vaison, a Venus-sized, red-orange object appeared behind the "Dentelles de Montmirail," moved over the hills, and disappeared eastward. The observation lasted 18 minutes, with the trail lasting 50 seconds.

The article notes that regardless of the observation point, the phenomena consistently occurred in the direction of the "Dentelles de Montmirail." The site itself is described as desert-like. Observations tend to occur later in the day as the days grow shorter, and the phenomena appear to occur in periodic clusters.

Cartoons

The issue concludes with a satirical comic strip by Bébert, dated July 7, 1977, featuring humorous dialogues about UFOs, illusions, and the need to deal with "mice that scratch the ceiling."

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently explores the intersection of UFO phenomena with public perception, scientific inquiry, and theoretical explanations. The editorial stance appears to be one of open investigation, presenting both eyewitness accounts and speculative theories about UFO technology and origins. There is a clear interest in documenting sightings and analyzing public attitudes towards the subject, as evidenced by the survey and the detailed Vaison la Romaine reports. The inclusion of theoretical discussions on UFO construction suggests a desire to understand the 'how' behind the observed phenomena, while the satirical cartoons offer a lighter, more critical perspective on the subject matter.

This issue of OVNI Magazine, dated February 25, 1977, features a cover with the headline 'vive lueur rouge orangée' (vivid orange-red glow) and a diagram of a luminous object. The magazine delves into several detailed reports of unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) and related investigations conducted in France during 1976 and 1977.

Case 1: Sorgues, Vaucluse (February 25, 1977)

Reported by J.P.TROADEC, this incident involved four witnesses who observed a 'boule rouge-verte-jaune' (red-green-yellow ball) above the 'Dentelles de Montmirail' mountains. The object, described as the size of an orange but predominantly yellow, exhibited a triple color resulting from intense scintillation. Its angular height was estimated at 30-35 degrees. The phenomenon appeared to hover in place while performing a vertical translation, moving up and down. The witnesses noted it seemed distant, possibly tens of kilometers away. The observation lasted 15 minutes under clear skies.

Case 2: La Fargatte-Gluiras, Ardèche (February 12, 1976)

This report details an observation by the X family. While watching television, they heard two thunderous sounds. Mr.X initially saw nothing, but Melle X, looking from her bedroom window, observed a ball the size of a car, emitting a glow in the surrounding fields. The object projected a horizontal beam of light, described as 'like headlights.' The light was orange and did not exceed one meter in height. The initial sighting lasted about ten seconds, followed by a shorter three-second observation as the object moved higher and further away, appearing as three red lights. The investigation noted the presence of a nearby spring and a water lock. The family's dog showed no reaction. No physical traces were found on the site.

Complementary Observations and Investigations

Further details from the investigation into the La Fargatte-Gluiras case include:

• The X family had previously heard of UFOs but not shown particular interest.
• The observation was communicated through two channels: one via Mr. Duquesnoy (president of A.A.M.T.) from Dr. Bonelli, and another from Mr. M., who had made a similar observation on January 9, 1977.
• There was a discrepancy regarding the presence of snow the morning after the event, with Melle X certain of it and Melle Y denying it.
• Dr. Bonelli and the gendarmerie visited the site but did not see the witness (Melle X, 18 years old, was at school).
• Dr. Bonelli's visit about a month after the alleged landing found no visible traces.
• The departure of the craft was estimated to be towards the north or northwest.
• The speed of the light beam illuminating the landscape was perceived as slow.

Testimony of Mr. Y

Mr. Y, a farmer living near the landing site, also heard the unusual thunderous sound. He observed nothing initially, but the object was reportedly in a field behind his house. His daughter, who was working, did not recall the sound. No interference was noted on TV or electrical networks. The dog also remained unresponsive. Unlike Melle X, Melle Y stated it had rained that morning but there was no snow the following morning. A significant mushroom harvest was noted in the area following the event, with one circle of about 5 meters diameter showing a superior harvest.

Testimony of Mr. Z

Mr. Z, living in Gluiras, reported that while driving with his parents, his car's dashboard lights and headlights dimmed for about three seconds. He experienced no further electrical issues with his car. He recalled the event happening around 10:30 PM on the same day as the X family's observation. The Z family reacted to the mention of UFOs with knowing smiles, suggesting they didn't believe in them but acknowledged 'things' that needed other explanations.

Case 3: Choranche, Isère (March 1977)

This section details two observations by Mme F. and her son, who live in 'Les Payres.' They observed a luminous object, described as a yellow-orange 'fusée' (rocket) with rapid white flashing lights, approximately twice the size of the full moon. The object moved slowly along a 500-meter high rock face. Its altitude was estimated at 400 meters. It contoured the mountain to the north-west, about 2000 meters away. The witnesses were reportedly alerted to the passage of luminous objects every evening by Mr. Michel Cavagna. A previous observation in August 1974 at 'Ranconnière' (500 meters away) involved numerous luminous points moving along rock faces.

Case 3b: Choranche (March 1977)

Mr. and Mme C. observed a yellowish light, similar to a car headlight, moving slowly in the sky over several weeks, descending towards the horizon. The light would sometimes disappear. They observed it for about fifteen days until a change in daylight saving time disrupted their habits. The object's size, though resembling a headlight, ruled out confusion with Venus. Mr. C. perceived the light as larger than his wife did, possibly due to his vision problems. These observations primarily sparked their curiosity.

Case 4: Charvieu, Isère (July 19-25, 1977)

This report covers an investigation into traces found in a field. On July 19, 1977, Mr. L. (a farmer) discovered a strange circular mark in a wheat field. The mark was about 20 meters from his combine harvester. He initially thought it might be a rocket or a bomb. The gendarmerie of Pont-de-Cheruy and the air gendarmerie from SATOLAS were alerted. A masonry company was called to excavate the central part of the mark. The air gendarmerie concluded it might be lightning. Contrary to a press report, no burning traces were found on the wheat or soil. The soil composition is described as arable surface over clay, gravel, and sand. The mark was approximately 1.20 meters in diameter, with wheat stalks inclined but not flattened. The central 'crater' was about 10 cm deep, with a central hole 12 cm in diameter and 80 cm deep, extending east. Two marks, 5 cm deep, were also visible. During a follow-up investigation, a red ball was reported heading towards Charvieu on July 17 and July 22. The witnesses wished to remain anonymous.

Case 5: Charmes-sur-l'Herbasse, Drôme (January 30, 1977)

Mr. and Mme X reported an observation while driving on the D 67 road. Mme X saw a yellow ball, the size of the moon, above hills near silos. The object had red lights on its sides, resembling 'retro-rockets.' They heard a siren sound, similar to American police cars, which frightened Mme X. They initially thought it was the silo's siren but noted the sound was continuous and different. After arriving home, Mr.X observed the object again; it turned red and diminished as if turning off. No effects were noted on the vehicle, but Mme X's watch began malfunctioning afterward. The observation lasted 11 to 13 minutes.

Follow-up Observations

The witnesses reported seeing the same phenomenon multiple times in February 1977, always in the same direction (Ardèche) between 9:30 PM and 10:15 PM. The object appeared brighter than the moon, sometimes visible alongside it, and would grow and shrink. It never disappeared completely. On one occasion, the object 'turned off' after the car flashed its headlights and 'turned back on' when the headlights were turned off. The siren sound was not heard again, and its origin remains a mystery.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue highlights a pattern of UAP sightings characterized by luminous objects, often described as balls or spheres, with unusual colors and behaviors. Several cases involve potential physical traces or electromagnetic effects. The magazine's approach is investigative, presenting detailed witness testimonies, locations, dates, and the findings of the researchers. The editorial stance appears to be one of open inquiry into these phenomena, documenting reports and seeking explanations, while acknowledging the challenges of verification and the possibility of misidentification.

This issue, identified as number 46, focuses on "TRACES A CHARVIEU" (Traces in Charvieu) and includes a significant section on "Catalogue des Humanoïdes" (Catalog of Humanoids). The cover date is June 12, 1977. The content appears to be in French and originates from France.

Traces in Charvieu

The article "TRACES A CHARVIEU" presents a detailed investigation of ground traces. A diagram illustrates a cross-section of the site, showing different soil layers: 'terre arable' (arable soil), 'terre caillouteuse argileuse' (stony clay soil), and 'graviers cassés - sable' (broken gravel - sand). Measurements indicate depths of 10 cm, 12 cm, 50 cm, 60 cm, and 80 cm. The wheat stalks are described as inclined but not burnt. Two indentations are noted, each 12 cm wide and 50 cm long, with a depth of 5 cm. The diagram also indicates a 'cratère' (crater) and 'terre nue' (bare ground).

Photographs accompanying this section show a 'coupe' (cross-section), a 'cuvette' (hollow), and the 'site' itself, with a vehicle present. A top-down view diagram of the site in Charvieu is also provided, showing a circular pattern with measurements and labels for 'terre nue'.

Letter to the Secretary of State for Research

A letter dated June 12, 1977, from the "groupements du Sud-Est" (groups from the Southeast) addressed to the Secretary of State for Research in Paris, highlights the growing interest and research into unidentified aerial phenomena (OVNI). The letter references the Gendarmerie Nationale's instructions since August 1968 to collect observations and notes a significant shift in public authorities' attitude in 1974 under Minister of Defense Robert GALLEY. It mentions researchers like Claude POHER from the Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales who have been centralizing information from armed forces, gendarmerie, and private investigation groups. The letter expresses regret that researchers lack the time and resources to conduct effective research and emphasizes that France has historically maintained an open, non-systematic denial attitude towards this issue, unlike other countries. The signatory groups, which are numerous and spread across the territory, have gained significant experience in information gathering and have assisted scientists. They state that scientists have succeeded in demonstrating the reality and scientific importance of the OVNI phenomenon. The associations, all non-profit, feel it is their duty to respectfully draw the attention of the Ministry to the value of exploiting the collected data. They express a strong desire for France to take the initiative in providing sufficient funding for official scientific research. The letter concludes by stating that the public, now more sensitized than ever, would favorably welcome such an attitude from the authorities.

The letter is signed by representatives of various groups: A.A.M.T., G.L.R.U., A.D.E.P.S., G.R.E.P.O., C.R.U.N., G.R.I.P.H.O.M., and C.S.E.R.U., and VERONICA.

Activities of UAP Research Groups

Pages 5, 6, and 7 detail the activities and meetings of various UAP research groups. A meeting took place in Imbours on June 11-12, 1977, organized by A.A.M.T., bringing together diverse groups from the Southeast. Participants presented their members and activities. Notable presentations included equipment developed by GRIPHOM, such as magnetic detectors, autonomous and mobile stations, and ultrasonic and electrostatic detectors. Individual contacts continued after the meeting. A subsequent meeting on Sunday morning allowed groups to refine ongoing projects. Nicolas GRESLOU of CSERU discussed his research into ancient Greek and Latin texts for information on unusual phenomena described in antiquity.

Michel FIGUET of AAMT presented a file on "low-altitude landings and overflights." J.C. FUMOUX of ADEPS presented a study on the logic of isosceles triangle-based landings, suggesting the potential installation of fixed detection posts. Eric ZURCHER of CRUN presented a study on humanoids in France based on a catalog of over 140 cases, with CRUN beginning statistical programming with the support of CNRS researchers. A project for a federation was briefly discussed, with the current solution of exchanges and cooperation deemed satisfactory. The creation of CUFOS FRANCE was also mentioned, with groups agreeing in principle but awaiting further results.

Several events and encounters are listed chronologically:

• June 25-26, 1977: Michel FIGUET represented AAMT at a colloquium organized by GRIPHOM in Marseille.
• Late June 1977: R. and D.DUQUESNOY visited Robert CATINAT and Jean and Josiane GIRAUD.
• July 20-21, 1977: Thierry PINDIVIC and Rémy RENAUD met with Michel DORIER, André CHALOIN, D. and R.DUQUESNOY, and M.FIGUET during their "tour de France ufologique."
• August 1977: M. FIGUET took ufological holidays in the South of France. On August 3, he was received by AAMT members at the gendarmerie in Guillaumes, discussing traces from Colmars-Les-Alpes. On August 6, an observation evening at Saint-Barnabé with PIN-VIDIC and RENAUD only observed artificial satellites. On August 7, a meeting with M.HYENAR (CRUN president) took place in Nice, followed by a reception in Antibes with J.C. FUMOUX.
• August 10, 1977: A counter-investigation in DRAGUIGNAN concerning a case from September 27, 1945.
• August 11, 1977: Visit to Michel MOUTET and his wife, publishers of "LA REVUE DES SOUCOUPES VOLANTES."
• August 16, 1977: Interview of M.FIGUET by M.CHOMBARD for NICE-MATIN.
• August 16-21, 1977: Conference in SALERNE with Michel MOUTET and Alain PRIGENT.
• August 18, 1977: M.FIGUET, R.AUDEMARD, M.BOISNARD, and C.ALOS contested a conference by Jean MIGUERES, a self-proclaimed "contactee by extraterrestrials." This initiative was poorly received, as confirmed by a VAR-MATIN-REPUBLIQUE article on August 20.
• August 21, 1977: Meeting in Toulon with R.AUDEMARD.
• August 22, 1977: Counter-investigation regarding an observation at MALMONT near DRAGUIGNAN on October 19, 1973.
• August 25, 1977: Reception at Aimé MICHEL's home for a presentation of the "Landings in France" file.
• August 13, 1977: Debate and presentation in Vernoux-en-Vivarais, organized by Roland BREYTON, animated by R.BREYTON, D.DUQUESNOY, J.P. PATTARD, and Lionel REYNAUD.
• August 19, 1977: Debate and presentation in LA LOUVESC, animated by D.DUQUESNOY and L.REYNAUD.
• August 30, 1977: James PETIT met with R. and D.DUQUESNOY in Valence.
• September 16-20, 1977: Raymond and Chantal BONNAVENTURE visited. An interview on September 17 between Marc Marinello (SLEPS Lausanne), R. BONNAVENTURE, and D. Duquesnoy explored potential collaboration. On September 18, members of AAMT, PALMOS, Dupi, Charton, and the Bonnaventures met, where Marc Marinello presented the work of SLEPS.

Catalog of Humanoids

This section features a comic-style catalog of different types of humanoids. Each type is illustrated with a distinct visual style and accompanied by a short dialogue or description:

• Type Espiègle (Mischievous): Depicted as a small, round figure with large eyes, shown attempting to make a saucer drink from a cup.
• Type Malin (Clever): A more humanoid figure with a helmet, asking how to pass unnoticed in France. The answer is "It's simple, I visited France on Mardi Gras!"
• Type Malchanceux (Unlucky): A figure with antennae, holding a camera, looking distressed. The dialogue suggests they are being blamed for something they deny involvement in, possibly related to a clandestine advertisement in the AAMT bulletin.
• Type Coquet (Flirtatious): A slender, feminine figure with a helmet, posing. The dialogue is "Wait a moment, let me make myself beautiful!"
• Type Grincheux (Grumpy): A stern-faced, alien-like figure with a prominent nose and pointed ears, wearing a uniform with "A.A.M.T." insignia. The dialogue expresses frustration: "If they continue to ridicule us in their review, I'm quitting AAMT!"

The section also includes a "Service de Répression des Fraudes" (Fraud Repression Service) stamp and a reference to a previous AAMT bulletin (n°17) titled "De nouvelles Formes d'aν.Κ.Ι." (New Forms of UAP). The drawings are by Bébert, and the text by M.D., dated August 12, 1977.

Commission d'enquêtes sur les O.V.N.I. - Association des amis de Marc Thirouin

The final page shows the logo for a "commission d'enquêtes sur les O.V.N.I." (Investigation commission on UFOs) from "BROME - ARDECHE," and the "Association des amis de Marc Thirouin" (Association of friends of Marc Thirouin).

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the detailed investigation of physical traces of UAP (as seen in Charvieu), the collaborative efforts and activities of various French UAP research groups, and the exploration of the nature of humanoids. The editorial stance, as conveyed through the letter to the government and the reporting of group activities, is one of advocating for more serious, official, and scientifically-backed research into UAP phenomena in France. There is a clear emphasis on data collection, analysis, and the need for governmental support to advance the field.