UFO Informations - No 16 - 1er trim 1977

Magazine Overview

Title: UFO INFORMATIONS
Issue: N°016
Date: 1st Quarter 1977
Publisher: AIHPI
Country: France
Price: 5,00fr

This issue of UFO INFORMATIONS, published by AIHPI, presents a collection of UFO (OVNI) observations and investigative reports from France, primarily from December 1976 and January 1977. The cover prominently features the text "Commission d'enquetes sur les OVNI" (Commission of inquiries on UFOs), accompanied by an illustration depicting a luminous, circular object in the sky above a city scene.

Editorial

The editorial, titled "-1- EDITORIAL", written by M. DORIER, advocates for a prudent and investigative approach to ufology. It draws a parallel with Buddha's method of defining Nirvana by what it is not, suggesting that this approach should be applied to understanding UFOs. The editor criticizes the proliferation of theories that have obscured rather than clarified the subject, likening some researchers to Don Quixote, crusading for their dogmas. The editorial stresses that the organization's focus remains on the study of the UFO phenomenon itself, rather than adhering to rigid theories. It argues that while understanding is natural, claiming to have achieved it prematurely is imprudent. The editorial reiterates that it is easier to state what UFOs are not, listing examples such as them not emerging from the earth, their occupants not resembling insects, and not being mounted on wheels. The organization's approach is described as a process of selection, narrowing down the field of inquiry without necessarily pinpointing the subject. The editorial concludes by stating that their program is precisely to not have a strict program, aiming to avoid commitment to any single method.

Activities of the Organization

Section "-2- NOS ACTIVITES." details the organization's engagements. These include audio-visual presentations and debates at the LIONS-CLUB in Valence on December 20, 1976, and a conference at St-DONAT on January 21, 1977, attended by about fifty people. Exposé-debates were also held in Grenoble on January 22, 1977, with participants from I.E.R.I. and LDLN, and in Loumarin on January 27, 1977, with representatives from the ROTARY CLUB and G.R.E.P.O. A meeting with the C.S.E.R.U., a Savoyard study and research group, took place on February 19, 1977, focusing on inter-group relations. The organization received journalist Yvon BOZZO of PEUPLE LIBRE, which resulted in an article about UFOs. An information campaign in Ardèche was also highlighted, with an interview of J.P.PATTARD published in "LA TRIBUNE Drôme, Ardèche Sud, Vaucluse Nord" on February 17, 1977. The results of a survey conducted during the fair of ROMANS are postponed to the next issue. Readers are reminded of an observation campaign planned for April and May, with instructions provided in issue 15 bis.

UFO Observations Dossier

Section "-3- DOSSIER OBSERVATIONS" presents a "NEW MINI-WAVE OF OBSERVATIONS IN OUR REGION." The magazine notes that due to the volume of information, only a few selected cases are detailed, with others still under investigation.

• Nyons, Drôme (December 4, 1976): Mr.J. observed a round object moving between VINSOBRÉ and NYONS.
• La Voulte, Ardèche (December 22-23, 1976): Between midnight and 1 AM, Mme D. observed an object moving with back-and-forth motions near the Trinière hills.
• Aubenas and Balazuc, Ardèche (December 23, 1976): Mme R. saw a round, luminous object in the sky.
• Nyons, Drôme (December 24, 1976): A neighbor of Mr.J. observed a luminous phenomenon.
• L'Isle sur Sorgue, Vaucluse (December 29, 1976): Mr. and Mrs. B. noticed a black object with large portholes while crossing a level crossing.
• Pierrelatte, Drôme (December 29, 1976): At 8:35 PM, Mr.F. took several photos of a luminous object, appearing larger than Venus, with a trajectory from West to East. It moved up and down, changed direction abruptly to the South, and was silent. The observation lasted 7 minutes. The object was red in front and orange at the rear.
• Périgueux, Dordogne (December 30, 1976): A 19-year-old student, Joseph Palatino, and his 14-year-old sister, Anne-Marie, observed a strange phenomenon three times within an hour. Three yellow-orange lights, the size of a grapefruit, were followed by three white balls forming a 'V' shape, oscillating up and down. A white conical light was also observed at the front. The phenomenon moved at very high speed in complete silence. Authorities were informed and the gendarmerie initiated an inquiry.
• Chomerac, Ardèche (December 31, 1976): Observation reported in "Dauphiné-Libéré".
• Creysseilles, Ardèche (January 1, 1977): First observation of the year at 1:30 AM.
• Combovin, Drôme (January 1, 1977): A quasi-landing was observed at 7:45 PM.
• Saint-Pierreville, Ardèche (January 1, 1977): Between 8 PM and 9 PM, M. Blachier, his wife, and two children observed a large, orange-emitting UFO for half an hour. It appeared as a sphere or ovoid, below the clouds, moving slowly. The observation was reported in "Dauphiné-Libéré".
• Saint-Donat, Drôme (January 1, 1977): Around 8 PM, Mr.D. and his daughter observed a luminous ovoid object, yellow-orange with dominant orange reflections, appearing like a firework. It was located about 20-30 degrees above the horizon, towards the South-West. The phenomenon disappeared by 11 PM.
• Le Chambon Dornas, Ardèche (January 7, 1977): Mr.B., a retired gendarme, observed an orange circular shape with a clear white beam extending from it. He estimated the distance to be 6 km. The orange shape appeared and disappeared behind a church steeple three times. The white light persisted for about 30 minutes. The apparent diameter of the object was estimated at 1.50 meters relative to the steeple.
• Marcols les Eaux, Ardèche (January 9, 1977): Four people observed a sphere with vivid red-orange colors and a reddish tail moving at high speed, leaving a red trail. The witness called Dr. Bonelli, whose son observed a luminous white halo, followed by an orange flash and the halo's disappearance. An orange sphere then emerged, exhibiting vertical translation movements before disappearing. The diameter was not evaluated.
• Tours, Indre-et-Loire (January 10, 1977): Two women observed an unidentified flying object described as elongated with a bright, intense central light. Mme Martin, a nurse, and Mme Vernejoul witnessed the phenomenon, which disappeared like a reflector in fog.
• Noves, Bouches du Rhône (January 12, 1977): Mr.J. Bas, a technician from C.N.R.S., observed a star-like object that grew in size, appearing as a luminous star. It moved from North to South, changing color from yellow-white to red. Mr. Blas, using marine binoculars, observed a second identical star. These objects moved in leaps at speeds twice that of an airplane, at an estimated altitude of 3000 meters. Two other witnesses, Mr. Bas's son and a neighbor, also observed the phenomena. The objects reappeared above a row of cypress trees. The technician approached the phenomenon by car. One of the "stars" made a sharp turn, returning to its initial trajectory, coinciding with the passage of an airplane overhead.
• Valence, Drôme (January 13, 1977): Observation reported in the dossier.
• Annonay, Ardèche (January 14, 1977): Five or six municipal employees observed two very bright white balls that disappeared rapidly in a cone shape. The objects were visible for about 3 minutes and appeared to be about one meter above the Trachin church steeple.
• Le Chambon Dornas, Ardèche (January 15, 1977): Mr.C., his wife, and son observed a stationary, luminous white ball, the size of the full moon, near the ground above a mountain. The sphere disappeared rapidly towards the North-East/South-West.
• Col du Pas de la Case, Ariège (January 18, 1977): A 19-year-old girl, Patricia Monin, her parents, and other tourists observed an impressive luminous object, red and black, immobile in the sky. The girl took a photo just before the object ascended vertically at extraordinary speed and disappeared. The same phenomenon had been observed there a few days prior.

Library and Documentation

Section "-8- Bibliothèque – documentation" indicates that the magazine is available in international bookstores, specifically mentioning "LES LOGES DE L'ODEON" at 10, rue Casimir Delavigne, 75006 Paris.

Free Tribune

Section "-10- Tribune libre (finalité et logique)" is mentioned in the table of contents but not detailed in the provided pages.

Association Page

Section "-11- La page des associations" is also mentioned in the table of contents but not detailed in the provided pages.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around eyewitness accounts of UFO sightings, the investigative process, and the organization's activities in promoting awareness and research. The editorial stance, as articulated by M. DORIER, is one of critical inquiry, emphasizing empirical evidence and a cautious approach to interpretation. The magazine appears to favor detailed reporting of observations while discouraging premature conclusions or the formation of rigid theories within the field of ufology. The emphasis is on understanding the phenomenon through careful study and the collection of data, rather than through speculative or dogmatic frameworks.

This is a special 25th-anniversary issue of the French ufology publication "OURANOS". The content is a mix of contemporary UFO sighting reports, historical analysis of celestial phenomena, and critical commentary on the state of ufology and its organizations.

UFO Sightings (Early 1977)

The issue begins with a series of detailed reports of UFO sightings that occurred in France in January and February 1977. These include:

• Domène, Isère (January 25, 1977, 1:00 AM): Serge Pintchouk, a papermill worker, witnessed a cigar-shaped object, larger than an airplane, moving silently at about 200 meters altitude. It projected multi-colored lights onto the ground and was observed for two to three minutes before bifurcating and disappearing.
• L'Isle-sur-la-Sorgue, Vaucluse (January 25, 1977, 7:30 AM): Two young women employed at "Platrières de France" saw a luminous, hexagonal object moving slowly and silently at helicopter height for five minutes.
• Charmes, Drôme (January 30, 1977, around 8:30 PM): Mr. M. observed a red-orange light, initially mistaken for a ground fire, which appeared suddenly in the direction of Charmes and was observed for only a few seconds without any apparent movement or disappearance.
• Charmes, Drôme (January 30, 1977, 9:30 PM): Mr. and Mrs. P. observed a yellow ball, seemingly the size of the full moon, with red lights on its sides resembling taillights. The object was seen to the left, above the hills, and later, when Mr. P. observed it again, it was in the direction of Lac de Champos. The lights stopped, and the object turned red before diminishing and appearing to extinguish.
• Eyragues, Bouches du Rhône (February 1, 1977): Eight teenage girls observed a strange craft, described as a semi-sphere about 60-70 cm in diameter with a luminous perimeter, hovering near buildings and trees at a height of about twenty meters for about fifteen minutes. The report also mentions a similar sighting by five people less than a month prior.
• Saint-Marcellin, Isère (February 2, 1977, 9:30 PM): A mysterious phenomenon was observed above the village of Chatte. Witnesses described a circular object of bright red color and significant size, which remained motionless for over 10 minutes, emitting a very bright incandescent red light.
• Châteauneuf-sur-Isère, Drôme (February 7, 1977, 7:30 PM to 7:45 PM): Mrs. G. saw three red balls following each other in the sky, which then moved off at an angle. She had the impression of seeing movement inside them.
• Valence, Drôme (February 18, 1977, around 7:00 PM): A person reported a luminous phenomenon that followed their vehicle. Neighbors who came out also witnessed the phenomenon.
• Vaison-la-Romaine, Vaucluse (February 22-25, 1977): A series of observations of punctual objects with aberrant trajectories were reported. Information from the Orange base indicated no military maneuvers at the time.
• Saint-Marcellin, Isère (February 23, 1977): An article from "Dauphiné Libéré" described a red disk, "house-sized," moving slowly near the ground and emitting a shower of sparks before disappearing at high speed. However, investigations by the gendarmerie and investigator M. Figuet revealed it to be a SNCF track maintenance machine (a "bourreuse").

Historical and Scientific Context

Page 10 delves into the historical classification of celestial phenomena, referencing the 1740 "DICTIONNAIRE DE TREVOUX" for a broad definition of "METEORE." It distinguishes between igneous, aerial, and aqueous meteors, listing examples like thunder, will-o'-the-wisps, rainbows, and hail. The text clarifies the modern understanding of "METEORE" as a luminous phenomenon caused by a meteoroid's passage through the atmosphere, often called a "shooting star" (though this is imprecise), with the brightest being called "bolides." A "METEORITE" is defined as a celestial object whose passage through Earth's atmosphere creates the luminous phenomenon.

Page 11 discusses meteorites, noting that about a hundred have been found, with three exceeding 100 kg. It classifies meteorites into three categories: siderites (iron-nickel), sideroliths (iron and silicates), and aeroliths (silicates). The text then presents historical accounts of strange phenomena attributed to "meteorites" from an 1863 book by J.E. de Mirville, including enormous stones seen for days, and an "enormous aerolith" in Connecticut that allegedly "militarized" an American zone and returned to its origin.

Page 12 recounts a dramatic event in Rome on November 2, 1861, where a cone-shaped phenomenon, described as an "angelic power," caused destruction at the Vatican, opening large windows and crushing them.

Analysis of Ufology and Organizations

Pages 7-10 are dedicated to a critical review of the "OURANOS" organization on its 25th anniversary. The authors, M. & R. DORIER, express skepticism about the organization's current direction, suggesting it relies too heavily on the legacy of Marc Thirouin and suffers from a "notable decline in standing."

• Critique of OURANOS: The review argues that presenting OURANOS's activities by constantly referencing Marc Thirouin's memory is an arbitrary tactic. They question whether Thirouin would endorse the current methods and suggest a significant difference between the past and present OURANOS.
• Pierre Delval's Article: Delval's article is criticized for attempting to reduce ufology to a strictly "OURANOS" conception, excluding other prominent ufologists. His reliance on appealing to subscribers and friends for financial support is also highlighted as a sign of the organization's difficulties.
• Alain Gadmer's Article: Gadmer's text, which calls for "friendship" and a "helping hand," is dismissed as opportunistic and indicative of OURANOS's declining status. The authors recount negative experiences with a ufological group in Grenoble (LDLN-Grenoble), describing jealousy and petty maneuvers when the "DAUPHINE LIBERE" published articles on the subject.
• Jimmy Guieu's Article: Guieu's article is critiqued for attacking "dissidents" who left OURANOS and for his "pseudo-scientific" jargon, which is seen as alienating academics and the general public.
• International Meetings: The reports from international UFO meetings are dismissed as having "credibility close to zero," characterized as "fairs" that have further discredited ufology by presenting a mix of approximate ufology, Kabbalah, dowsing, and other unscientific elements.
• Marc Thirouin's Legacy: The issue acknowledges the prescience of Marc Thirouin's writings from 1954-1960, noting that much of what is discussed today was already covered by him and other early ufologists like Guérin and Michel, who are notably absent from this anniversary issue.
• Critique of "Transfuges" and "Secessionists": The authors discuss articles by Consolin and the group G.A.B.R.I.E.L., suggesting they are trying to gain prestige by using technical and philosophical arguments without possessing the necessary depth.
• Overall Assessment: The anniversary issue is seen as an attempt to use a "glorious past as a screen" to hide a "declining present." The authors reject the idea of conspiracies and instead attribute the decline to the organization's own responsibility and inability to acknowledge and learn from its errors.
• AAMT as "Spiritual Daughter": The issue concludes by saluting AAMT as the "spiritual daughter" of Marc Thirouin, praising their serious work, a statement later clarified by D. Duquesnoy of AAMT, who states they do not consider themselves spiritual daughters of Thirouin but have adopted the spirit of C.I.E.S. OURANOS (1951-1972), which they claim has no common ground with the current C.E.OURANOS.

Philosophical Reflections

Page 13 discusses the film "Planet of the Apes" as an illustration of humanity's potential attitude towards extraterrestrial visitors. It posits that humanity's aggressive pride and fear make it difficult to accept anything different, leading to a tendency to dominate or destroy. The film's depiction of intelligent apes being interrogated by a self-important commission is compared to how similar personalities might react to the UFO problem – with initial ridicule followed by aggression.

Page 14 continues this theme, suggesting that humanity's denial and destruction of the UFO phenomenon is a form of self-deception, akin to its willingness to create atomic bombs. It criticizes governments for hypocrisy and deceit regarding UFOs, referencing claims by Major Keyhue about U.S. Air Force and Russian initiatives to chase UFOs. The authors lament that a humble minority denouncing human folly is ridiculed, while the majority follows the "strongest and craziest."

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the reporting of unexplained aerial phenomena, the historical context of such observations, and a critical examination of the ufology community itself. The editorial stance is one of skepticism towards organizational claims and a call for intellectual honesty and rigorous investigation. There is a clear distinction made between genuine scientific inquiry and what the authors perceive as self-serving or pseudoscientific practices within some ufology circles. The issue emphasizes the importance of acknowledging errors and learning from the past, particularly in the context of the OURANOS anniversary, which is framed as a moment of reckoning rather than celebration.

This issue of the APRO Bulletin, identified as volume 6, number 15, and dated July 1976, focuses on UFO phenomena and related mysteries. The cover headline highlights 'Memory Gaps... Abductions?', indicating a central theme of unexplained experiences.

The Moody Case: Memory Gaps and Abduction

The issue presents a continuation of the report on the MOODY affair, previously featured in issue number 15. Sergeant MÜÜDY had witnessed a UFO and experienced a 1 hour and 25 minute gap in his memory. Following advice from Dr. GOLDMAN, he underwent hypnosis to recover the lost time.

On October 6th, MOODY reported that the memory gap was filled. He recounted being taken aboard a spaceship. He expressed frustration with the lack of understanding regarding UFOs, stating that multiple advanced races are exploring Earth and will reveal themselves within three years, possibly as early as the summer of 1976.

He described the beings he encountered: approximately 5 feet (1.52m) tall, similar in appearance to humans but with larger heads, no hair, slightly larger eyes, small noses, and thin lips. Their mouths did not move when they spoke. They wore a black, seamless garment without zippers or buttons.

MOODY recalled being led by a 'chief' into a room about 6 feet (1.60m) below the ship's entry point. This room was 25 feet wide, with a large carbon bar in the center reaching the ceiling. He also saw a large black box in a corner, the purpose of which he was told never to reveal.

The 'chief' then placed his hands on MOODY's temples and told him it was time to leave, instructing him not to remember anything for at least two weeks. MOODY noted that it was two weeks after this encounter that he began to remember, coinciding with a visit to ALAMOGORDY.

The translation of this section is attributed to M. BESSY.

UFOs and Skepticism: A Comic Strip

Page 2 features a comic strip titled 'Les incredules' (The Unbelievers). It presents various skeptical viewpoints on UFOs, including the idea that they are invented to distract from important issues, and that the described alien planet is barren and lifeless. The strip also includes humorous depictions of aliens and UFOs.

Case Study: The St-Louis Group's Investigation

An excerpt from the SKYLOOK revue (No. 98, January 1976), a monthly publication of MUFON (26, Edgewood Drive, QUINCY, ILLINOIS - USA), details an investigation by David SCHROTH of the St-Louis ufological group.

On the night of October 12th, Mme X, who had gone to bed at 10:30 PM, awoke at 1:30 AM. Around 2:00 AM on October 13th, her dog began barking aggressively. Believing it might be a fox or raccoon, she looked out her bedroom window.

She saw a human-shaped entity moving away from the back of the house towards a wooded area about 20 meters away. She initially described it as a 'silver wolf running on two legs'.

The entity turned and looked in her direction. It was described as having a human silhouette, about 3½ feet (1.10m) tall, and luminous from head to toe, like aluminum foil reflecting light in the dark. Three other similar entities appeared, joined the first, and they all moved into the woods in single file.

No objects belonging to the X family were found to be missing, and nothing was discovered in the woods later. The report notes that no other testimony has corroborated this observation to date. This section is also translated by M. BESSY.

The Tunguska Event: An Enduring Mystery

Page 5 delves into the Tunguska event of June 30, 1908, which caused a cataclysm in the Siberian Taiga. Initially classified as a meteorite, the event has defied scientific explanation for nearly 70 years, with over 70 hypotheses proposed and hundreds of scientific publications on the subject.

The Russian newspaper 'Krasnoiarski Rabotchi' (November 1975) is quoted, stating that science continues to try and unravel the enigma. The explosion was reportedly 1000 times more powerful than the Hiroshima atomic bomb. However, a detailed analysis of samples from the epicenter revealed that the explosion was not nuclear, as it did not contain argon 39. Mathematical calculations suggest the event could be explained by a massive mass of snow and dust, weighing at least 100,000 tons.

An article in 'Les Nouvelles de Moscou' (June 12, 1976) by P. GOUSKOV, citing Professor N. VASSILIEV, highlights the enigma of 10% of the explosion's energy being converted into a bright light, a phenomenon not explained by current science except for nuclear explosions. The resulting fire also behaved unusually, felling trees that then caught fire, while trees at the epicenter remained intact, though their branches were broken.

Research by LVÜV discovered silicate particles (10 to 800 microns) in the peat layers of the explosion region. These particles, with up to 15% sodium and potassium oxides, differ from volcanic, meteoritic, and technological silicates. The article questions how such fantastic energy was released, suggesting the possibility of a 'cosmic vessel' if the explosion was not nuclear, but concludes by urging adherence to facts.

Another article in 'Les Nouvelles de Moscou' (September 11, 1976) by Igor ZUTKINE of the Committee for Meteorites suggests that a meteorite 50 to 25 meters in diameter moving at 30 km/s could produce such energy. He notes that the Tunguska explosion occurred in the air, not on the ground, as there is no crater.

The Bermuda Triangle and Other Anomalies

Page 6 discusses the Bermuda Triangle, noting its current negative reputation. The Russian journal 'Sotsialistitcheskaĩa Indoustria' (January 1977) reports that in the 31 years since 1945, the Bermuda Triangle has been responsible for the disappearance of about a hundred ships and a dozen aircraft, often without distress calls. It also mentions the 'Sea of the Devil' between Japan and the Philippines, where nine ships have disappeared.

A commonality between these 'triangles' is their geographical latitude and depth (4,000-5,000 meters). In both areas, compasses point to true north rather than magnetic north.

There are also reports of aircraft landing before their scheduled times, suggesting they may have encountered extraordinary winds or 'Space-Time holes'.

Soviet researchers Nikolai GÜNTCHAROV, Valeri MAKAROV, and Viatcheslav MOROZOV propose a theory that the Earth is structured like a giant crystal, with phenomena concentrated on its edges and intersection points. They suggest that terrestrial fissures align with these edges and that triangle vertices correspond to magnetic anomalies.

Page 7 continues this discussion, linking the Bermuda Triangle and the 'Sea of the Devil' to eight other regions of disappearances identified by T. SANDERSON. The 'Skylab' astronauts discovered that the ocean surface in the Bermuda Triangle region is 25 meters lower than normal, an anomaly undetectable by standard instruments.

Professor A.I. YELKIN suggests that the Earth's flattening at the poles, combined with the gravitational pull of the Moon and Sun, causes oscillations in the Earth's axis. These gravitational variations create stresses in the Earth's crust, leading to seismic disturbances and underwater phenomena. YELKIN observed that aircraft disappearances in the Bermuda Triangle often coincide with full or new moons, periods of maximum gravitational stress.

Parapsychology and Unexplained Phenomena

Page 7 also touches upon parapsychology in Russia, mentioning the work of physicist Lev VENTCHAUNAS and his research into 'unknown Biological links'. He conducted experiments with fish, suggesting that some species might emit 'fear waves' detectable by others.

Page 8 elaborates on VENTCHAUNAS's work, including experiments with ants and his development of methods for training healers. The article notes the growing interest in traditional medicine in many African countries, with some governments establishing special services and recognizing traditional healers.

VENTCHAUNAS also discusses dowsing, stating its practical utility in finding resources, and mentions experiments with plants that react to threats and even to non-indifferent attitudes.

UFOs in Russia: Samizdat and Official Disdain

Page 8 reports that UFOs in Russia are currently relegated to 'samizdat' (clandestine texts) due to negative press. The 'Komsomolskaya Pravda' criticized a samizdat summary of a lecture by M.F. ZIGEL, which mentioned a UFO sighting over Naltchik in January 1976 and another UFO alongside an airplane. The newspaper dismissed these claims, stating there is no proof of superior civilizations or human contact with other life forms.

Astrological Determinism and Loch Ness

Page 9 discusses the acceptance of astrology in a thesis at the University of Grenoble by Michaël GAUCHER, who posits that the astrological constant 'Uranus' predisposes individuals to sociology. He believes astrology can help define individual potential.

The issue also revisits the Loch Ness Monster, reporting on an expedition led by Dr. Robert H. RINES. Despite sonar detecting two objects (3 and 10 meters long) in Temple Pier and Fort Augustus, the animal remained elusive and did not reveal its identity. The article speculates that the creature might be a descendant of marine animals that lived when Loch Ness was connected to the sea 12,000 years ago.

Other Anomalies and Witch Hunts

Page 9 mentions a similar phenomenon in Lake KOL-KOL, Kazakhstan, where M.A. PETCHERSKY observed a large, zigzag-shaped creature. The article concludes this section with a brief report on a witch hunt in South Africa where 14 people were burned alive.

Books Review

Page 10 provides a list of recently published books related to paranormal phenomena, including:

• 'Nouvelles Recherches sur le Phenomene Psi' by S. Ostrander and L. Schroeder (Laffont)
• 'Le Vampirisme' by R. Ambelain (Laffont)
• 'Chroniques des Civilisations Disparues' by P. Ferryn and I. Verheyden (Laffont)
• 'A la Recherche des Mayas' by V. Von Hagen (France-Empire)
• 'Les Secrets de l'Astrologie du Yi-King' by Y. Thieffry (Elsevier)
• 'Les Pensees Communiquantes' by M. Damien and R. Louis (Tchou)
• 'Les Extra-Sensoriels' by a group of authors (Tchou)
• 'Freud et l'Occultisme' by C. Moreau (Privat)
• 'Ces Mysterieux OVNI' by A. Ribera (De Vecchi)
• 'Chasseurs d'OVNI' by an unnamed author, humorously recounting the experiences of UFO hunters in France.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are UFO sightings, alien encounters, memory loss associated with such events, and the enduring mysteries of phenomena like the Tunguska event and the Bermuda Triangle. The editorial stance appears to be one of presenting various accounts and scientific investigations, while acknowledging the unexplained aspects of these phenomena. There is a clear interest in detailed eyewitness testimony and the scientific attempts to rationalize or explain these events, even if definitive conclusions are not reached. The inclusion of a comic strip suggests an attempt to engage a broader audience, while the book reviews indicate a commitment to covering the latest literature in the field.

This document, identified as page 26 of a publication titled "SERVICE DE PRESSE - ECHANGES," details a collection of parapsychology and ufology-related publications and case reports. It is published by Editions Albin Michel and appears to be a French-language exchange bulletin.

Parapsychology and Esoterica

The bulletin begins by listing several publications under the "PARAPSYCHOLOGIE - DIVERS" section. These include:

• LES CAHIERS DE L'ETRANGE (No. 4): Topics covered are the Halley comet, Templar history, and practical parapsychology.
• KADATH (No. 21, January-February 1977): Features articles on the Olmecs and French megaliths.
• KRUPTOS (No. 3, Autumn 1976): Addresses the issue of contactees.
• LA TRIBUNE PSYCHIQUE (1st Quarter 1977): Published from Paris.
• ASTROLABE (No. 12, Winter 1976): A review from GERAS.
• REVUE DU MAGNETISME ET DU PSYCHISME EXPERIMENTAL (Nos. 11-12-13): Published from Lille.

Ufology Reports

The majority of the document is dedicated to ufology, listing various bulletins and reports:

• DU CIEL A LA TERRE (Nos. 32, November 1976; No. 33, February 1977): Published in Geneva.
• L'INSOLITE (No. 4): A bulletin from Mâcon, detailing a landing at La Guiche.
• UFOLOGIA (No. 7, 1st Quarter 1977): From C.F.R.U. in Forbach, it analyzes an unusual case in Moselle and discusses the Bermuda Triangle.
• LES EXTRATERRESTRES (No. 1): From St-Denis Les Rebais, it covers a landing near Montmirail (Marne), an interview with Henry Durrant, and the OVNI mass-field hypothesis.
• VERONICA (No. 6, October 1976): From the VERONICA group in Nîmes, it discusses a 1976 case in Poitiers and probabilities of seeing UFOs.
• ADEPS (No. 18): Presents an astronomer's viewpoint, a luminous crescent in St-Laurent de Var, a detector, and an observation in Auribeau sur Siagne.
• INFO-OVNI (Special issue): From Montluçon, it includes a catalog of cases from Creuse (1906-1976) compiled by Robert CATINAT.
• UFO-INFO (No. 46, December 1976): From GESAG, it mentions the Center for UFO Studies, MUFON, and an observation of a low-altitude UFO in Cognies, Chaussée (59).
• INFORESPACE (No. 31): From SOBEPS, it covers the Bermuda Triangle, world cases, traces in Delphos, and a photo dossier from Argentina.
• APPROCHE (No. 12): From SVEPS Toulon, it discusses UFOs over Orange, traces, biocommunication, and whether it was a UFO or a bird.
• AUSTRALIAN UFO BULLETIN (August 1976 & November 1976): Reports on the Maubeuge UFO and Australian observations.
• APRO-BULLETIN (Vol. 25, No. 2 & 3): Covers August and September 1976, including a UFO sighting over Teheran.
• UFJ JOURNAL (No. 104 & 105): From MUFON (USA), it details the Travis Walton abduction.
• BULLETIN DU GREPO (No. 1): From Avenue Pablo Picasso, Sorgues, it reports observations in Carpentras and a landing at Puget sur Durance.
• UFO-QUEBEC (No. 8): Discusses humanoid encounters in Gaspesie, a case in Namur (1955), and a hypnotized witness.
• PILOTE PRIVE (Nos. 35-39): Covers UFO detection, hoaxed photos, and photographic UFO hunting.
• LDLN (No. 160, December 1976): Includes 10 investigations and a spectrographic study of UFO phenomena.
• LDLN (No. 161, January 1977): Features "angel hair," a possible underwater UFO base near Venezuela, and 7 investigations, including the Maubeuge UFO with Claude POHER's opinion.
• LDLN (No. 162, February 1977): Contains 10 investigations and "puzzle pieces" by J.P. PETIT.

DECALAIRE Magazine

• DECALAIRE (No. 1, January 1977): This issue features an editorial titled "VUES NOUVELLES." The editorial is quoted for its complex, philosophical language regarding intellectual constructs and their impact on perception. It also includes an article by F. LAGARDE and a bibliographic review of "DES LIGNES ET DES MOTS."

Book Announcement

A last-minute announcement for "PREMIERES ENQUETES SUR LES HUMANOIDES EXTRATERRESTRES" by Henry DURRANT, published by Editions R. Laffont.

Dossier Enquiries: Puget-sur-Durance Landing

This section details an investigation into a UFO landing reported on May 16, 1976, near Puget-sur-Durance (Vaucluse). The investigators, J.P. TROADEC and R. FRANCHINO, interviewed witnesses Mr. and Mrs. B. and their daughter, who are farmers. The object was described as dome-shaped, rust-colored, and immobile on an island in the Durance river. The witnesses initially saw it from their car and later observed it more closely. The object was about a hundred meters away, separated by the river. The family B. initially thought it might be an old truck cabin, not realizing the island was uninhabited. Mr. P., who owned the land, was more disturbed as he was familiar with the area and recalled the Valensole incident. He later returned with binoculars but found no trace of the object. The investigation noted that military maneuvers had occurred on the island shortly before, which could explain tire tracks, but the UFO sighting was two days after these maneuvers ceased. The object's dimensions were estimated at 3.40m high and ten meters wide. No physical effects were reported on the witnesses, their car, or watches. The conclusion is that this case warrants inclusion in the UFO dossier, with regret that the witnesses did not pay closer attention.

Enquiry: Chomérac Sighting

An investigation into an observation on December 31, 1976, around 11:30 PM in Chomérac (Ardèche). The witnesses were Mme M. (retired) and her granddaughter Melle B. They observed a white-red-yellow sphere above a hill behind their house. The sphere turned red and moved closer before disappearing over the hill. The phenomenon lasted 10 to 30 seconds. The witnesses described the balls as being close to the ground. An investigator visited the site the next day without finding anything. A power outage was reported 20 minutes before the sighting. The investigator noted a later sighting in the same direction and that other people had seen similar phenomena in Chomérac. Mme F. had previously seen a large red-orange star-like object in September 1975. A Mr. L., a teacher and mayor, reportedly witnessed a UFO years ago.

Observation: Creysseilles Sighting

This report details an observation on January 1, 1977, at 1:30 AM near Creysseilles (Ardèche). The witnesses were Mr. and Mrs. B. and their three children. They observed a luminous, immobile, flame-red sphere with a diffuse pinkish light in the Mezayon valley. The object was described as being as bright as daylight and remained visible for about 10 minutes. The family B. had previously witnessed the Chomérac phenomenon and discussed it, which prompted them to report this sighting. The investigator noted that the family B. had no prior interest in UFOs and showed no fear, only surprise.

OVNI A COMBOVIN (Drome) Sighting

This report describes an observation on January 1, 1977, between 7:15 PM and 7:45 PM, between Chabeuil and Combovin (Drôme). The witnesses were Mr. and Mrs. P. While driving, Mrs. P. noticed a large, bright star-like object following their vehicle at high altitude. Mr. P. initially dismissed it as a helicopter. Later, on the return trip, they stopped and saw a light in a field. The object was described as a "mudslide" or freshly plowed field, not roadworks. The investigator suggests the initial sighting might have been Sirius visible through clouds, but this doesn't explain the return observation.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The document primarily focuses on UFO sightings and investigations, with a secondary focus on parapsychology and esoteric subjects. The tone is investigative and reportorial, presenting witness testimonies and the findings of the investigators. There is a clear effort to document and analyze these phenomena, often referencing previous cases or related publications. The editorial stance appears to be one of open inquiry into unexplained phenomena, without outright dismissal but with a critical approach to evidence, as seen in the analysis of potential explanations and the notes from the investigators.

This issue of "La Motte Fanajs" (likely a publication title, possibly related to the "Revue Lumieres dans la Nuit") from March 14, 1974, focuses on UFO/UAP sightings and investigations in France during the 1970s. It includes detailed witness testimonies, investigator notes, and a comic strip illustrating a sighting.

Investigation: La Motte-Fanjas (March 14, 1974)

On Thursday, March 14, 1974, a witness named Madame X was driving from St. Hilaire Royans towards "La Motte-Fanjas" around 2:00 AM. She noticed a light illuminating the trees and the road. She initially mistook a truck for the object but then accelerated. The object, described as a light, was seen first above a farm named "Rietière" and then to the left of the road above a hill. The object followed a trajectory parallel to the road, ahead of the car, and then moved towards the hill. The comic strip depicts a car on a road at night with a bright light in the sky, followed by panels showing the object's movement and the witness's reaction.

Investigation: Marcols-les-Eaux, Ardèche (January 1, 1977)

On January 1, 1977, between 8:20 PM and 8:30 PM, the B. family was watching television. Mr. B. observed an orange luminous ball moving slowly towards the northwest. He called his family, and they all observed the phenomenon. The object, described as having a diameter similar to a football, moved below the cloud ceiling (around 1200m). One of Mr. B.'s sons used binoculars but could only discern a slight shimmer and a trail. The object had no halo and was estimated to be 3 km away. It disappeared behind the crests near Mézilhac (altitude 1100m) after approximately 20 minutes. Its speed and shape remained constant. The witnesses are accustomed to seeing jet aircraft from the Orange airbase. No confusion was possible.

Investigation: Montmiral, Drôme (January 1, 1977)

On January 1, 1977, at 8:00 PM, a witness at "Les Brudeaux" in Montmiral observed a phenomenon. The witness initially saw a "bizarre star" and called friends. Five people observed a bright, scintillating point of light towards Ardèche, in the direction of Lemps. The light descended slowly for about 5 minutes, then seemed to ascend before moving horizontally westward at a fantastic speed.

Investigation: Unknown Location (January 3, 1977)

A witness reported an object that illuminated the ground like a football stadium, with the object itself being about 200 meters above the ground. The investigator noted that the object could only have been 20-30 meters above the ground for the hill to be visible behind it. The witness stated they stopped their car for 8-10 minutes. The car's headlights were working, and the car's systems were normal. The witness observed the object, described as immobile at an estimated height of 150-200 meters. The witness later visited the site during the day and used the car's door as a reference point to gauge the object's position relative to the horizon and the hilltop. The investigator's note indicates the hilltop is at 365m, and the object was in a field below, at an altitude of 350m, close to the ground.

The witness described the object as having a luminous halo and a central form. After observing, the witness flashed their headlights, and their wife noted the car was moving, but the witness stated it was the object that was rising. The object then moved right, then left, at a fantastic speed, disappearing in three seconds. When asked to describe the object, the witness could not logically do so but recalled mentioning a large red flame underneath the central form to the gendarmerie. The halo was estimated to be 200m in diameter, while the central object was 25-40m. The central object was described as metallic and darker than the halo, with a dark condensation trail noted by the witness's wife.

Investigation: Unknown Location (January 4, 1977)

On the site of an observation, Mrs. P. reported that her watch, despite being wound, advanced 30 minutes in a quarter of an hour on January 3rd and 4th. On the 4th, at 10:30 AM, her watch showed 10:55 AM. The witnesses reported no noise or smell. The Chabueil airbase is 7 km away. A past incident from 1954 involving a landing and a humanoid presence is recalled.

Investigation: Valence, Drôme (January 13, 1977)

On January 13, 1977, between 7:50 PM and 8:00 PM, Mr. B. was on his roof when he saw a bright yellow luminous point that grew larger. He went to get his binoculars, but the object disappeared. It reappeared to the left of the first sighting. Its apparent diameter was a quarter of the moon's. The object was not clearly defined, its volume increasing and decreasing. Through 100x magnification binoculars, two forms were visible within the light. These forms merged into one, which then became a red point and disappeared after moving left. This phenomenon repeated. The witness observed it five times during the 10-minute observation. The phenomenon was described as: 1. Naked-eye vision of a bright yellow luminous form. 2. Reappearance, decrease in volume, and disappearance. 3. Binocular observation: two objects merging and disappearing. 4. Repetition of the maneuver, with displacement. 5. Similar phenomenon at a lower altitude. This sighting is compared to one in Noves on January 12, 1977.

Tribune Libre: Finality and Logic

This section discusses scientific thought regarding creation and the complexity of nature. It references Professor J. Monod's view that complexity argues against the idea of God. The author explores the idea that mechanical logic governs matter and life, using examples like the formation of a water molecule and the structure of galaxies. The exponential spiral of a seashell is presented as a four-centered spiral, and the carbon atom's electron configuration is linked to the number of fingers and the structure of a starfish. The author speculates that nitrogen and its electrons might be responsible for the five fingers and five branches of a starfish.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are UFO/UAP sightings, witness testimonies, and the investigation of these phenomena. The magazine appears to present these accounts factually, with detailed notes from investigators. The "Tribune Libre" section suggests a leaning towards rational and scientific explanations, even when discussing complex or seemingly inexplicable phenomena, while still acknowledging the mystery of the universe. The overall stance is one of open inquiry into unexplained aerial phenomena.

This document, titled 'LA PAGE DES ASSOCIATIONS AMIES' (The Page of Friendly Associations), issue number 11, published in the first trimester of 1977 by the Association des Amis de Marc Thirouin, focuses on ufological activities in France. The content includes a section detailing recent UFO sightings and information about a specific ufological organization.

Dernières Informations: UFO Sightings

The first part of the document presents a series of recent UFO observations, primarily from the Vaucluse and Ardèche regions of France, dated from late 1976 to early 1977.

• December 24, 1976: An observation was reported in Carpentras (Vaucluse).
• January 9, 1977: In La Fargatte Gluires (Ardèche), three witnesses observed a luminous ball emitting light over a valley. The ball illuminated the entire mountain, then repeatedly turned off and on before extinguishing.
• January 28, 1977: In Carpentras (Vaucluse), a large luminous ball was seen moving under the clouds at a regular speed, without noise. Its contours were blurry, and it moved from south to north.
• February 2, 1977: In Cavaillon (Vaucluse), Mr. G. observed an unusual object crossing the sky at approximately 80 meters altitude. The silent object, viewed from below, had six lights (four red, two yellow) and was estimated to be 6 meters in diameter, moving at a rapid and regular speed.
• February 23, 1977: In Creysseilles (Ardèche), around 7:15 PM, Mme C. saw a bright red point blinking like an airplane. This point hovered east-southeast of the village, appearing above Privas. It then moved towards St-Bauzile and seemed to return over Le Pouzin before disappearing.
• February 23, 1977: In Mont Toulon (near Privas, Ardèche), Mr. G. observed a light at 7:20 PM that seemed to originate from a precise point in the sky, illuminating a portion of the mountain. Suddenly, the light vanished.

These reports are attributed to sources such as GREPO (Groupement de Recherches et d'Etude du Phénomène OVNI) and J.P. Pattard.

LE GROUPEMENT DE RECHERCHES ET D'ETUDE DU PHENOMENE OVNI POUR LE VAUCLUSE (GREPO)

This section introduces the GREPO, a research group for UFO phenomena in the Vaucluse region, founded in March 1975 by Monsieur Pierre Monnet. The group underwent a significant restructuring and reformed its bureau starting January 1, 1977, also updating its statutes and undergoing a new declaration with the prefecture of Vaucluse. GREPO is now the regional delegation for the international research group "Lumières dans la nuit" (Lights in the Night) for the Vaucluse department.

GREPO's core activities are outlined as:
1. Researching UFO cases: This includes collecting information, conducting on-site investigations, and analyzing collected data.
2. Study: Through work meetings.
3. Archiving: Maintaining records of findings.
4. Information dissemination: Using press, radio, television, public information meetings, and publishing an information bulletin.
5. Related and technical research.

These activities are primarily focused on the Vaucluse department, in collaboration with other ufological associations in France. Members of "Lumières dans la nuit" in Vaucluse are automatically members of GREPO. Non-members of "Lumières dans la nuit" are also welcome to join GREPO.

The association expresses a vision for ufological research to be decentralized, with departmental groups eventually forming a French Ufology Federation. They encourage regional action and collaboration with individuals knowledgeable about local areas and ufology.

GREPO invites all ufologists from Vaucluse to contact them to develop research efforts in the department, which they note has lacked a dedicated research group until now.

Bureau and Administration

• The document lists the composition of the GREPO bureau for 1977:
• President: David DUQUESNOY
• Vice-President: Michel DORIER
• General Secretary: Michel BESSY
• Deputy Secretary: Rolande DORIER
• Treasurer: Régine DUQUESNOY
• Deputy Treasurer: Marie ROUGON
• Archivist: Michel FIGUET
• Information Advisors: Jean-Marc REBULL, Jean-Louis RUCHON

Honorary Members include André CHALOIN and Chantal & Raymond BONNAVENTURE.

The bulletin is described as the result of collective analysis and reflection, and readers are encouraged to contribute articles and suggestions. The association's activities are declared according to the law of July 1, 1901. The regional delegation covers Drôme and Ardèche.

Publication and Legal Information

The publication is printed in France, with Michel DORIER listed as the Director of publication. It is printed by the Association using a duplicator at 29 Rue Berthelot, VALENCE. The legal deposit was made in the first trimester of 1977.

Articles, photos, and drawings are protected by copyright law (1957). Partial reproduction is authorized if the source is cited. Articles published are the responsibility of their authors, and unsolicited manuscripts are not returned.

The administration is handled by the ASSOCIATION DES AMIS DE MARC THIROUIN, located at 29 Rue Berthelot, 26000 VALENCE. Their telephone number is 44.58.48, and they have a permanent contact hour every Wednesday from 6:30 PM to 7:30 PM.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The issue strongly promotes collaboration and decentralization within the ufological community in France, advocating for the formation of regional and departmental groups that can eventually unite. The editorial stance appears to be one of active research, data collection, and information sharing, emphasizing the importance of local knowledge and expertise. There is a clear effort to build a network of researchers and enthusiasts, inviting participation from anyone interested in ufology. The inclusion of specific sighting reports underscores a commitment to documenting and investigating UFO phenomena.