UFO Informations - No 14 - 3e trim 1976

Magazine Overview

This issue of UFO. INFORMATIONS, published by AIHPI and dated the third quarter of 1976, is identified as issue number 14. The cover prominently features the title "UFO. INFORMATIONS" alongside "Commission d'enquetes sur les OVNI" (Commission for Investigations into UFOs). The cover art depicts a dramatic scene with a UFO hovering over an industrial landscape during a stormy night, observed by two figures. The magazine is published in France and priced at 5.00 Francs.

Editorial Stance and Content Overview

The Editorial section, authored by M. DORIER, addresses the increasing frequency and page count of the bulletin. It emphasizes the magazine's commitment to presenting a variety of perspectives on intriguing phenomena, even if they appear contradictory, provided they are supported by serious argumentation. The editorial critiques "defeatism" in ufology, arguing against prematurely dismissing new ideas based on past failures or perceived inconsistencies. It draws parallels with other sciences, like archaeology and physics, which also grapple with unresolved questions and complex phenomena, suggesting that the study of UFOs should not be abandoned due to its current uncertainties.

The Table of Contents reveals a diverse range of articles:

1. EDITORIAL: Discusses the nature of ufological research and the challenges of interpretation.
2. LA GRANDE PRESSE ET LE PARANORMAL: Examines how mainstream media covers paranormal topics.
3. DOSSIER TECHNIQUE : UN NOUVEL INDICATEUR DE CHAMP MAGNETIQUE: A technical report on a new magnetic field indicator.
4. LA PAGE HUMORISTIQUE: A humorous section.
5. EFFETS PSYCHIQUES ET UFOLOGIE: Explores the psychological aspects related to ufology.
6. A POITIERS, LE RATIONALISME A PERDU UNE NOUVELLE BATAILLE: Reports on an event in Poitiers where rationalism was reportedly overcome.
7. LA PAROLE EST À VOUS: A section for reader contributions.
8. BIBLIOTHEQUE: Book reviews or related content.
9. A PROPOS DE: A section for discussion or commentary.
10. DOSSIER OBSERVATIONS: Presents UFO sighting reports.
11. ENCORE LES ANNEAUX.DE FEE: Further discussion on fairy rings.
12. HOSTUN: UN CAS TROUBLANT: Details a specific, troubling UFO case.

The editorial also includes a quote attributed to "CARO" stating that disagreements between human reality and theories do not invalidate reality itself.

Association Information

Page 3 provides details about the publishing association: "Association déclarée conformément à la loi du 1º Juillet 1901". It is the "Délégation Régionale 'Lumières dans la Nuit'" for the Drôme, Ardèche, and Vaucluse regions. The Bureau for 1976 is listed, with David DUQUESNOY as President and Michel DORIER as Vice-President and Director of Publication. The association is printed by the association itself using a duplicator at 29 rue Berthelot in Valence. The legal deposit date is the 3rd quarter of 1976. The "ASSOCIATION DES AMIS DE MARC THIROUIN" is also mentioned, located at the same address in Valence, with public reception hours on Wednesdays and Saturdays.

Analysis of Press Coverage and Skepticism

Article 2, "LA GRANDE PRESSE ET LE PARANORMAL," discusses the growing difficulty for the mainstream press to ignore paranormal phenomena. It notes the internal conflict among journalists between objective reporting and outright denial, often driven by reader preferences or a desire for journalistic ease. The article highlights the "VIE CATHOLIQE" (February 4, 1976) featuring an article by J.P. Allaux titled "QUAND LE FER SE MET A TROTTER" (When Iron Starts to Trot), which explores the idea of matter obeying the spirit and the existence of physical faculties that contradict material laws.

Michel REMY's analysis in "LA VIE CLAIRE" (April 1976) of Pr. C. Louis KERVRAN's work on low-energy transmutations is also presented. An experiment at the "Institut Fédéral de Recherches en matière de Réacteurs" in Switzerland showed a significant increase in calcium in oat seeds without external input, suggesting biological organisms can capture cosmic energy. Kerveran extrapolates this to telepathy, noting its insensitivity to Faraday cages, implying it's not electromagnetic.

Article 6, "A POITIERS, LE RATIONALISME A PERDU UNE NOUVELLE BATAILLE," suggests a significant event where rational explanations failed.

Article 7, "LA PAROLE EST À VOUS," is a reader contribution section.

Article 11, "ENCORE LES ANNEAUX.DE FEE," revisits the topic of fairy rings.

Article 12, "HOSTUN: UN CAS TROUBLANT," details a specific, unsettling case.

Critique of Skeptical Arguments (Kirlian Effect and Parapsychology)

Article 6 (continued from page 5) delves into the Kirlian effect, referencing articles in "SCIENCE ET VIE" and "L'EXPRESS" that dismissed its significance. These articles attributed the phenomenon, which resembles an aura, solely to temperature differences. The magazine counters this by presenting evidence that the Kirlian effect can reveal physiological and psychological states, even detecting diseases in plants and humans. An experiment by the Kirlian couple showed two seemingly identical leaves producing vastly different images, one revealing contamination from a serious plant disease invisible to the naked eye. The article criticizes scientists who dismiss the effect if it's not electromagnetic, and points out that some "SCIENCE ET VIE" technicians failed to replicate the experiments, leading them to conclude everyone else was wrong.

The magazine also defends parapsychology against critiques by Mr. Alain Ledoux in "SCIENCE ET VIE" (April 1976). Ledoux is accused of generalizing from a few litigious or fraudulent cases to dismiss the entire field. The article defends the work of researchers like Sir William Crookes and Eusapia Palladino, and questions Ledoux's dismissal of Uri Geller. It argues that just because some cases involve fraud (often discovered by parapsychologists themselves), it doesn't invalidate the entire discipline, drawing an analogy to archaeology and falsified fossils.

Analysis of "Le Monde" Article on UFOs

Article 2, "LE MONDE, LES OVNI ET COMPAGNIE," critically analyzes an article by M. Arvonny in "Le Monde" (November 8, 1975) titled "OBJETS VOLANTS : DES OVNI ET DES HOMMES." The author of this section finds Arvonny's piece to be humorous and somewhat misanthropic. Arvonny's assertion that "OVNI" (Unidentified Flying Objects) have nothing to do with "HOMMES" (humans) is questioned. The article highlights Arvonny's humorous take on identifying UFOs, such as seeing a human face in the moon, and his suggestion that helicopters, despite their noise and visible blades, can be mistaken for UFOs under specific conditions (wind, being on a harvester). The author finds Arvonny's critique of the Condon report, which spent over half a million dollars on UFO studies, ironic, given Arvonny's own dismissive approach.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue consistently champions a spirit of open inquiry into paranormal and UFO phenomena, encouraging serious investigation and argumentation. It actively challenges skeptical viewpoints, particularly those perceived as dismissive or based on selective evidence, such as the critiques of parapsychology and the Kirlian effect. The magazine also engages with how these topics are presented in the mainstream press, often finding the coverage lacking in depth or objectivity. The inclusion of a humorous section and the critical analysis of a humorous article in "Le Monde" suggest an appreciation for diverse approaches to the subject matter, while maintaining a core belief in the importance of exploring these phenomena seriously. The editorial stance is one of cautious optimism and persistent investigation, advocating for continued study despite the inherent difficulties and uncertainties in the field.

This issue of LE MONDE, dated 1976, delves into the complex relationship between UFO phenomena and parapsychology, alongside critiques of media coverage and scientific rationalism. The magazine presents a multifaceted perspective, featuring articles that question the validity of certain UFO claims, explore the scientific investigation of these phenomena, and even include technical details for building a magnetic field detector.

Critiques of UFO Reporting and Media

The issue opens with a critique of a scientific methodology applied to UFOs, questioning the conclusions drawn by an individual named M. Arvonny. The author suggests that Arvonny's assessment of the UFO situation as 'extremely bad' is based on a flawed premise, particularly regarding the reliability of witness testimony. The article implies that a rigorous scientific approach might lead to the conclusion that extraterrestrial visitors are not present, citing the lack of public appearances by alleged extraterrestrials.

A significant portion of the content is dedicated to analyzing how the newspaper LE MONDE itself covers UFOs. One piece criticizes an anonymous review in LE MONDE of J.C. Bourret's book "LE NOUVEAU DEFI DES OVNI." The critic, referred to as M.A., is accused of employing wordplay and flawed logic to dismiss the existence of unidentified flying objects, suggesting that any such objects are merely an 'effect due to the imperfection of testimonies and insufficient information.' The article draws a parallel between M.A.'s argument and the police's identification of criminals, questioning the assumption that all unidentified individuals are human.

Another article scrutinizes a piece in LE MONDE that discusses the book "LE NOUVEAU DEFI DES OVNI." The author of this critique expresses concern over the 'debility of spirit' demonstrated by M.A.'s commentary, which dismisses potential discoveries in astronomy, physics, and botany. The critique suggests that M.A.'s approach is to reassure readers that there is nothing to worry about, implying a potential self-reassurance by the editorial team.

The magazine also contrasts LE MONDE's approach with that of VALEURS ACTUELLES, which published a more serious and objective review of Bourret's book by Michel Mourlet. Mourlet's review is quoted as stating that Bourret's book 'can only advance knowledge' and that 'methodological confidence and audacity have always proven decisive.'

Further criticism is leveled at the newspaper L'HUMANITÉ-DIMANCHE for its condemnation of astrologers and ufologists, suggesting a sectarian approach to phenomena that do not fit a primary Manichaean worldview. The article "LES MARTIENS VOTENT A DROITE" is singled out for its sensationalist title, which the author argues is not justified by the content, which focuses on hoaxes and minor incidents.

The Intersection of UFOs and Parapsychology

A dedicated section explores the link between UFOs and parapsychological phenomena. It highlights an article from the English magazine Psychic News, which questions the connection between flying saucers and psychic phenomena. The article discusses the work of journalist Anne Dooley, who, after initially being skeptical, became interested in parapsychology and even underwent a 'healing' by a 'healer.' Dooley's research suggests that UFO testimonies are increasingly accompanied by parapsychological events, such as telepathic communications, luminous rays, materializations, and poltergeist effects.

A specific case cited is that of Cynthia Apple-ton in Birmingham, England, in 1957. She reported experiencing oppression and seeing the silhouette of a man near her fireplace. The apparition, described as tall and blond, was accompanied by a whistling sound and a feeling of calm. The visitor, who claimed to be from another world and sought 'titum' (possibly tritium), transmitted an image of his spaceship. This testimony is presented as significant because it contains elements that would later be commonly encountered in UFO observations, even in the early days of the phenomenon.

The author poses the question of whether ufologists, parapsychologists, and scientists can unite their research to understand these phenomena, which currently challenge human comprehension and the limits of our intelligence. The author expresses hope that future research will lead to the development of our cerebral capacities.

Rationalism and UFOs: The Poitiers Colloquium

The issue reports on the second international days on UFOs held in Poitiers in June 1976. The event, organized by the city of Poitiers and animated by Jean-Claude Bourret, brought together numerous scientists to present their private research. Notable participants included researchers from CNRS, the Gendarmerie Nationale, astrophysicists, and a researcher from the Institute for the Future (USA).

The colloquium featured presentations on the scientific investigation of UFOs. Claude Poher demonstrated that observers had indeed witnessed something 'strange and inexplicable' in a significant proportion of analyzed reports. Captain Bernard Cochereau highlighted the Gendarmerie Nationale's new approach to UFO issues, offering advice to witnesses and assuring them of anonymity. He also mentioned well-known cases from 'Petite Île' (Réunion), Lezay (Deux-Sèvres), Laulne (Manche), and Revigny-en-Ornain.

Jacques Vallee presented a study based on data from the USA, particularly the USAF file. Vallee's conclusion was that the phenomenon exists and is the product of a technology with significant energy resources. He emphasized the need to question established knowledge and the very definition of 'reality.' The article concludes that rationalism, in this context, has lost a battle, but reason itself has gained.

Local Initiatives and Technical Information

The magazine also touches upon local initiatives related to UFOs. In 1976, the commune of Ares, near Bordeaux, inaugurated France's first 'ovniport' (UFO port) for unidentified flying objects. This initiative was driven by Robert Cotten, an air security electronician, who believed that a lack of facilities prevented UFOs from landing.

In 1954, the mayor of Châteauneuf-du-Pape issued an order prohibiting the flight of flying saucers over the communal territory, threatening to impound any craft that landed. This is presented as an example of official reactions to the UFO phenomenon.

A "Technical Dossier" section provides detailed instructions for building a new magnetic field detector. The detector, developed by an ANTIBES team, consists of four main sub-assemblies: power supply, signal generator, multivibrator, and triggering mechanism. The article lists the components required for each part and explains their function, including the use of a thyristor and a light-dependent resistor (LDR) for triggering the alarm when the magnetic field changes.

Finally, the magazine includes recommendations for readers interested in ufology, such as the "LE GUIDE DE L'ENQUETEUR" fascicule from GNEOVNI and a questionnaire developed by ADEPS in collaboration with AAMT. Readers are encouraged to report any observations they may have.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the critical examination of UFO phenomena, the role of media in shaping public perception, and the tension between rationalism and belief. The editorial stance appears to be one of skepticism towards sensationalist claims and a call for rigorous scientific investigation, while acknowledging the existence of unexplained phenomena. There is a clear critique of how some media outlets, including LE MONDE itself, handle UFO reporting, often resorting to simplistic dismissals or sensationalism. The magazine champions a more nuanced and evidence-based approach, as exemplified by the scientific presentations at the Poitiers colloquium and the detailed technical information provided for enthusiasts.

This issue of "Le Monde Inexpliqué" (The Unexplained World), identified by its issue number '20', focuses heavily on UFO phenomena, with a particular emphasis on the connection between modern sightings and historical beliefs, specifically the concept of the 'devil'. The magazine presents a blend of scientific discussion, witness testimonies, and a review of related literature and publications.

UFOs and Intelligent Technology

The issue opens with M. Jean GOUPIL asserting that UFO phenomena possess an intelligent technology and exhibit intelligent behavior. This is contrasted with the strong opposition from some scientific circles, as highlighted by M. Pierre GUERIN, who argues that science is not violated by UFOs but perhaps utilized in a more complete manner. The work of M. Jean-Pierre PETIT and his research team is featured, detailing their semi-clandestine efforts to recreate the observed behavior of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) using limited resources, with plans for wind tunnel studies of their 'MHD or aerodyne' model.

M. Auguste MEESSEN is quoted expressing confidence in M. PETIT's research, stating, "It is beyond doubt that M. PETIT is on the right track..." M. KOHLER addresses the intriguing topic of communication between humans, UAP, and potential passengers.

A public debate, attended by over 500 people and animated by M. J.C. BOURRET, demonstrated the public's intense interest in the subject. A notable moment was the admission from a member of the Union Rationaliste de France, who confessed that his skepticism had been significantly shaken after attending the two-day event.

Many spectators shared their own experiences as witnesses to UFO phenomena, indicating a widespread occurrence of such events.

The Return of the Devil: UFOs and Historical Interpretation

A significant portion of the magazine is dedicated to exploring the idea that historical accounts of the 'devil' might actually be early interpretations of UFO sightings. The article "LE RETOUR DU DIABLE" (The Return of the Devil) posits that in France, a country that prides itself on liberty, expressing certain truths can lead to ostracization and loss of livelihood, particularly for volunteer ufologists.

It laments the closed-mindedness of some, comparing it to the era of Galileo, where new discoveries were met with resistance. The article draws a parallel between burning a person for an idea in the 16th century and ridiculing and rejecting someone in the 20th century for similar unconventional beliefs.

The author argues that while individuals may be silenced, ideas persist. The piece questions whether an intelligent person today would dare to publicly affirm the existence of the 'devil' without being labeled mentally unstable. It then urges readers to seriously consider the inexplicable phenomena occurring around us.

Specific UFO/UAP Incidents

The magazine details several specific incidents, emphasizing their chronological occurrence and locations, often near places with names related to the 'devil':

• April 18, 1974, 9:15 PM: A red sphere, 1 meter in diameter, passed by the windows of a dormitory in Pont-en-Royans, causing panic among students.
• May 6, 1974, 5:15 AM: A worker observed a white sphere, 1 meter in diameter, resting on articulated feet in a ravine near the tunnel of Petits-Goulets, close to the 'Maison du Diable'.
• January 9, 1976, 7:15 PM: A heating engineer in Echevis witnessed an Italian coffee pot-shaped craft, as tall as a three-story house, hovering one meter above the ground. Three humanoid figures emerged from it before the craft departed silently.
• 1954: A resident near the 'Ferme du Diable' saw a bizarrely shaped flying object playing leapfrog above walnut trees in broad daylight.
• March 21, 1976, 9:15 PM: Monsieur J.R. was driving near the Grands-Goulets when a brilliant object, about 1.20 meters high, appeared 6 meters away, blinding him and causing him to stop his car. This occurred near the 'Maison du Diable'.

The article suggests that our ancestors, encountering similar phenomena in the same locations, may have interpreted them as manifestations of the devil due to their religious beliefs.

Public Awareness and Scientific Progress

The magazine argues that despite advancements, humanity has not necessarily progressed if these phenomena are simply labeled as UFOs, as they remain unidentified. It calls for a broader dissemination of observations and testimony, moving beyond small, secret committees to engage the public and gain more information. The authors seek serious and courageous journalists who will report on their findings without fear of losing credibility.

Book and Publication Reviews

The issue includes a substantial "BIBLIOTHEQUE" (Library) section, listing numerous journals and bulletins received in exchange for press service. These cover a wide range of topics including astronomy, parapsychology, strange phenomena, esotericism, civilizations, and ufology. Notable publications reviewed include:

• Bulletins from G.A.P.R.A., SEIPP, L'INSOLITE, KADATH, and ADEPS.
• Journals like "La tribune psychique," "Revue du magnétisme et psychisme expérimental," "VERSEAU," "UFOLOGIA," and "UFO-NACHRICHTEN."
• Specific articles and reports on topics such as the Bermuda Triangle, humanoids, magnetic phenomena, and historical UFO cases.

Several books are also reviewed:

• "LE MYSTERE DES OVNI" by R. Jack Perrin, which covers UFO effects, humanoids, and extraterrestrial contacts.
• "LE TRIANGLE DES BERMUDES" by Ch. Berlitz, discussing mysterious disappearances.
• "LES RAISONS DE L'IRRATIONNEL" by P. Misraki, exploring aspects of reality overlooked by science.
• "SATORI OU UN DEBUT EN ZAZEN" by J. Brosse, about discovering hidden treasures within oneself.

"Le Livre du Mystère" by J. Bergier

Another section reviews J. Bergier's book "LE LIVRE DU MYSTERE" (The Book of Mystery). The reviewer notes that Bergier, a prolific author on the irrational and the unusual, presents a catalog of the inexplicable. While Bergier himself reportedly does not believe in UFOs, his name frequently appears in titles related to flying saucers, suggesting a particular brand of humor or a deep interest in the subject. The review points out that Bergier is a dedicated reader of ufological journals and even contributes to "FLYING SAUCER REVIEW." The book is said to cover elements like the UMMO affair, the contactee SIRAGUSA, Italian investigations, the Loch Ness monster, and Fortean phenomena.

"Vingt-Cinq Ans A Vivre" by Mario de Sabato

Mario de Sabato's book "VINGT-CINQ ANS A VIVRE" (Twenty-Five Years to Live) is presented as the work of a seer and disciple of Padre Pio. His second journal offers revelations about the Age of Aquarius and discusses essential problems related to the purpose of life. The book addresses issues of solitude, self-reliance, and inner happiness. De Sabato also touches upon topics such as petroleum, future events in China and Europe, the Catholic Church, flying saucers, and the 'golden age'. He believes in extraterrestrials and has had visions confirming their imminent visit to teach humanity wisdom. His advice is described as just and forward-looking, offering solutions for humanitarian issues, justice, equality, and world peace.

Dossier Observations

This section provides a chronological list of UFO observations from May to July 1976:

• May 16, 1976: An OVNI landed on an islet in the Durance river near Cadenet. A metallic, lenticular object, the size of a helicopter, was observed. It had partially disappeared by the next day.
• May 17, 1976: In Orange, a silent, orange disk was seen moving from North to South.
• July 6, 1976: In Bilbao, Spain, a UFO was photographed by "La Gazette du Nord" photographer, remaining immobile for a period.
• July 10, 1976: An automobilist near Chatuzange-le-Goubet observed a red, rectangular light that transformed into a circle and then an oval shape before disappearing rapidly. The object was described as extremely bright.
• July 11, 1976: Near Vaunaveys, an egg-shaped, silver object projected a beam of light and remained immobile.
• July 15, 1976: An observation was noted in Tokyo.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the nature of UFOs and their potential connection to advanced technology, the historical interpretation of unexplained phenomena, and the importance of public awareness and scientific investigation. The editorial stance appears to be one of open-minded inquiry, encouraging readers to consider unconventional explanations and to challenge established scientific dogma. There is a clear effort to bridge the gap between historical folklore and modern scientific observation, suggesting that many unexplained events throughout history might share a common origin in aerial phenomena.

This issue of Revue Planète, dated July 1976, features a cover story about Japanese police observing an object above the imperial palace. The magazine delves into various UFO and unexplained phenomena reports, including sightings in Colombia and a detailed investigation into a French witness's experience.

Reports from Around the World

Japan: Police Sighting

Seven members of the Japanese police identification section reported seeing an object above the imperial palace. The UFO was described as dark and approximately ten meters in diameter. The quality of the witnesses was noted as significant.

Colombia: Cali Sightings

In July 1976, three objects were observed above the city of Cali, Colombia. Witnesses described them as incandescent rings emitting white light.

The Hostun Case: A Troubling Incident

Historical Context

The case begins with a report from J.L. Ruchon, a journalist for the A.I.G. L.E. agency in Romans, who received information from a colleague at Dauphiné-Libéré about an observation made by Mr. Bouvier (Valence), brother of the mayor of Hostun, where the witness worked.

Preliminary Investigation

On July 8, 1976, a month after the observation, M. Figuet, an investigator for the association 'Lumières dans la nuit' (Lights in the Night), conducted a preliminary investigation at the request of J.L. Ruchon. He gathered the following information:

• Date of Observation: Friday, June 11, 1976
• Time: 01:30 to 03:30
• Duration: 2 hours
• Atmospheric Conditions: Good
• Witness: Female, Mlle Hélène Guiliana
• Domicile: Quartier de Boulogne, Hostun
• Location of Observation: RN531, at a place called 'Le Martinet', 5 km east of Bourg-de-Péage.
• Investigator: Michel Figuet (AAMT; LDLN)

Witness Testimony

Mlle Hélène Guiliana was driving her 4L car home from Valence around 1:30 AM on the night of June 10, 1976. After stopping for coffee in Romans, she was driving on the RN 531 when her car began to slow down. Fearing she was running out of gas, she checked the dashboard, but the fuel level was normal. She then saw a semi-spherical, orange luminous mass on the road about fifteen meters in front of her car.

Terrified, she locked her car doors and covered her eyes. After a considerable time, she noticed the luminous mass had disappeared. She was able to restart her car after several attempts, and drove home, deeply shaken.

Explaining the Two-Hour Gap

An interesting aspect of the case is the unexplained two-hour period during which Mlle Guiliana was apparently inside her car, with all lights off, on a usually busy national road, especially during the holiday season. The mayor of Hostun, M. Bouvier, provided positive information about Mlle Guiliana.

Investigator's Notes and Follow-up

• The witness did not wear a watch.
• She was wearing a garnet pull-over and jeans.
• When asked about marks on her body, similar to the 'HILL affair', she responded negatively.
• No physical effects were felt during or after the observation.
• There were no other witnesses.
• When asked how she knew the time upon entering her sister's room, she replied, 'upon waking my sister.'
• A compass check of the car showed normal magnetic variation (10º), and no change in paint color.
• The investigator confirmed the car started without issue.
• Upon inspecting the site, M. Figuet noted only a small circular indentation, 10 cm in diameter and 5 mm deep, which he identified as a common test mark used by road maintenance services.

Further Investigations and Hypnosis

J.L. Ruchon reported on these findings in Dauphiné-Libéré on July 12. The same day, A. Revol from the OURANOS group, informed by the press article, visited the witness. On July 13, A. Chaloin, M. Dorier, and M. Figuet from AAMT visited her again. They proposed a hypnosis session, which the witness initially refused.

However, on July 23, A. Chaloin published an article suggesting a hypnotic treatment. Unbeknownst to him, A. Revol had already subjected Mlle Guiliana to a four-hour hypnosis session on July 22, conducted by M. Etienne Dey ('Stéphane'), a magnetizer from Grenoble. This session reportedly placed the witness in a state of 'controlled hypnotic somnambulism'. The details from this session were published in the regional press on August 13, 1976, and broadcast on FR3 Rhône-Alpes.

Hypnosis Session Details

During the hypnosis session, Mlle Hélène Guiliana recounted that after seeing the dazzling light on the road, two small beings approached her car. They opened the door, placed a towel on her forehead, and carried her towards the light. She described these beings, referred to as 'nains' (dwarfs), as reaching her chest, wearing all-black suits covering them from head to toe, and being 'very ugly'.

She was taken to a room with a rounded ceiling and a floor of fire. She was placed and attached to an iron table. One of the beings used a flashlight-like object to draw luminous circles on her pull-over. She noticed buttons on the walls around her.

After this examination, the duration of which she could not specify, she was returned to her car, which reappeared as if it had been invisible. The 'dwarfs' then returned to the light, which rapidly ascended into the sky.

Second Hypnosis Session and Observations

No recording was made of the first hypnosis session, with information coming from press reports by Revol and Dey. During this session, the witness was taken to the observation site under hypnosis. She became nervous and indicated a direction with her hands, claiming the 'nains' were calling her. The hypnotist and M. Revol then made separate observations: one saw a luminous ball responding to car headlights, the other saw white, blinking lights.

On August 10, 1976, at the request of J.L. Ruchon, a second hypnosis session was organized with about twenty assistants, including journalists and a physician. This session was recorded. After two hours of discussion, the witness agreed to a limited hypnotic control.

The transcript of this second session reveals further details:

• The witness described seeing a ball of light.
• The 'nains' approached, opened her car door, and took her.
• They were two in number.
• They were described as 'moches' (ugly).
• They were small.
• They wore all-black outfits.
• She was taken to a round room.
• She was not seated but was handled by the 'nains'.
• The table was metallic and round.
• There was a lot of light.
• There were dials on the wall.
• The beings communicated through gestures and a faint 'souffle' sound.
• She felt they wanted to convey something, but she didn't understand.
• She was afraid.
• They used something to draw circles on her pull-over.
• She saw a luminous orange object.
• She was taken into the craft.
• She couldn't walk and her hands and feet were not tied.
• She climbed a ladder.
• There were many steps.
• The beings were one behind the other.
• She believes they are now in the sky.
• They gestured a lot.
• Their hands had five fingers.
• The contact felt like another person.
• Their skin color was not specified, but their clothes were black.
• The beings did not harm her.
• She felt they were 'menottes' (handcuffs) and the beginning of something.
• She was afraid and called for her mother.
• The lights were white, red, and yellow.
• The floor was metallic.

Further Analysis and Traces

J.L. Ruchon asked if the 'nains' seemed sympathetic, to which she replied they didn't harm her. She described their 'handcuffs' and the beginning of something. She was afraid and called for her mother. The lights were described as white, red, and yellow, and the floor metallic. The investigator noted that the traces found on the road were consistent with standard pressure tests by road maintenance services.

Fairy Rings and Goat Droppings

A Debate on Explanations

This section addresses a debate initiated by an article by M. Chaloin concerning 'fairy rings' (anneaux de fées) and a proposed explanation by M. Lentz involving goat droppings. M. Chaloin strongly refutes M. Lentz's theory, deeming it absurd and demonstrating a lack of understanding of the subject.

Chaloin's Argument

Chaloin asserts that he has absolute certainty that M. Lentz knows nothing about the subject he is trying to explain. He criticizes Lentz's theory that fairy rings could be caused by goat droppings from goats tied to a stake, calling it an 'absurd answer'. Chaloin argues that goats are delicate eaters and would not consume soiled grass, nor would any farmer cruelly tie a goat in such conditions. He believes Lentz is confusing a simple circle with a 'crown' (couronne) in Euclidean geometry.

Scientific Perspective

Chaloin refers to an article by researchers Jan and Josiane d'Aigure in 'Vues Nouvelles' No. 5, which he considers scientifically valuable. This article defines a fairy ring as a narrow circular peripheral band, distinguishing it from discs where the entire surface area shows traces. Chaloin implies that Lentz's ignorance of this distinction leads to his gross error.

Soil Modification

Chaloin emphasizes that the fairy rings involve a profound and chemical modification of the soil structure, which can remain visible for decades. He contrasts this with organic fertilizer, which would quickly disappear. He hopes M. Lentz will recognize his mistake and invites him and other readers to visit the Royans region to see the fairy rings in person.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue of Revue Planète focuses heavily on UFO sightings and alleged alien encounters, with a particular emphasis on detailed witness testimony and investigative efforts, including the use of hypnosis. The magazine appears to take a serious approach to these phenomena, presenting reports and investigations with a degree of credibility, while also engaging in debates about explanations, as seen in the 'fairy rings' discussion. The editorial stance seems to be one of open inquiry into unexplained events, encouraging readers to consider the evidence presented.

This issue of Inforespace, identified as number 26 and dated November 2, 1968, focuses on UFO-related phenomena, particularly the use of hypnosis in investigations. The magazine is published in France and is in French.

Key Articles and Content

The Hostun Case: Hélène's Testimony

The central part of this issue details an encounter experienced by a witness named Hélène in Hostun, France, on June 10, 1975. The account is presented as a transcript of a hypnotic regression session. Hélène describes being taken by small, dark beings, referred to as 'nains' (dwarfs), who were dressed in black combinations. She describes their physical characteristics: small stature, dark clothing, large eyes, and a 'bizarre' nose. The beings communicated through gestures and seemed agitated.

Hélène recounts being inside a craft, which she describes as round and made of metal. She notes the absence of openings other than a door and that the beings carried a 'box' in their hands. The interior of the craft is described as larger than her house. She also recalls an apparatus used to make circles on her pullover, which she compares to a flashlight.

During the hypnosis, various questions are posed regarding the beings' origin, their intentions, and the specifics of the encounter. Hélène mentions a recurring number 'three' in relation to the craft's speed and the beings' communication, though the exact meaning remains unclear. She also describes being carried and placed back in her car, with the craft disappearing.

Analysis of Credibility and Related Cases

The issue includes commentary and analysis of Hélène's testimony. It notes that the credibility of the Hostun case is enhanced by the witness's sincerity, good reputation, and willingness to undergo hypnotic treatment. However, the article points out several 'curious details,' such as the witness's initial fear leading her to try and close a car door from the inside (which is difficult), the lack of precise date recall, and the limited description of events during a prolonged abduction.

Several other UFO cases are referenced to provide context and comparison:

• Marius Dewilde's observation in Quarouble (September 10, 1954): Two humanoids were observed, and the witness was treated with hypnosis and truth serum by military authorities. The outcome is unknown.
• Dr. X's examination (November 2, 1968): A witness was examined under hypnosis at the request of Aimé Michel.
• Pascagoula fishermen (October 1, 1973): Two fishermen were reportedly lifted aboard a UFO and examined.
• Cases reported by Hynek: The 'new wave of flying saucers' by J.C. Bourret is mentioned, with witnesses undergoing hypnosis by Dr. Harper in the presence of Pr. Hynek.

The article discusses factors contributing to credibility, such as multiple witnesses (Barney and Betty Hill, Hickson, and Parker) and physical traces (Quarouble).

Commentary and Interpretation

Commentary by J.J. Jaillat suggests that UFO phenomena might be intelligent and intentional, potentially influenced by the unconscious psyche of the witnesses. The article acknowledges that while mystification is considered, it is not the most plausible explanation. It highlights that many elements of the Hostun case are found in similar cases across different continents, such as the vision of small, dark beings, which is common for 'occasional contactees' as opposed to 'chosen ones' who often report encounters with tall, blond beings.

The issue concludes that something strange undoubtedly occurred on the evening of June 10, 1975, but finding purely objective elements is challenging.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are UFO sightings, alien encounters, the use of hypnosis as an investigative tool, and the analysis of witness credibility. The editorial stance appears to be one of serious investigation into UFO phenomena, acknowledging the complexities and subjective nature of witness testimony while seeking to present factual accounts and expert analysis. The magazine aims to explore these mysteries, even when definitive conclusions are elusive, and suggests that the psychological aspect of encounters is significant.