UFO Informations - No 07 - mars-avril 1975

Magazine Overview

Title: UFO INFORMATIONS
Issue: Bimestriel n°7
Date: Mars-Avril 1975
Publisher: Association des Amis de Marc THIROUIN (AAMT)
Country: France
Price: 2,50 F

This issue of UFO INFORMATIONS, the seventh bimonthly bulletin from the Association des Amis de Marc THIROUIN (AAMT), delves into various aspects of UFO phenomena, with a strong emphasis on investigation and photographic evidence. The cover features a striking illustration of a UFO and a hand reaching towards it, setting a tone of mystery and inquiry. The publication is dedicated to the "COMMISSION D'ENQUETES SUR LES O.V.N.I." (Commission for Investigations into UFOs).

Editorial and Association Information

The bulletin begins with an "AVANT-PROPOS" (Foreword) by R. BONNAVENTURE, which uses a fictional narrative of receiving the bulletin itself from extraterrestrials to introduce the content. It highlights the importance of the bulletin and encourages readers to explore its pages.

The "COMPOSITION DU BUREAU POUR L'ANNEE 1975" (Bureau Composition for the Year 1975) lists the key personnel of the association: David DUQUESNOY (President), Marc REVEILLARD (Vice-President), Raymond BONNAVENTURE (Secretary-General), Noël BLACHER (Assistant Secretary), Chantal BONNAVENTURE (Treasurer), Claude PCYRENT (Assistant Treasurer), and André CHALOIN (Honorary Member). The publication is printed in France by the association itself using a duplicator, with R. BONNAVENTURE serving as the Director of Publication. The legal deposit date is the second quarter of 1975.

Table of Contents (SOMMAIRE)

The table of contents outlines the diverse topics covered:

1. AVANT-PROPOS (Foreword)
2. TRIBUNE LIBRE (Open Forum)
3. DOSSIER TECHNIQUE - SURVEILLANCE PHOTOGRAPHIQUE DU CIEL (Technical Dossier - Sky Photographic Surveillance)
4. DOSSIER OBSERVATIONS (Observations Dossier)
5. OBSERVATION ANCIENNE (Ancient Observation)
6. BIBLIOTHEQUE (Library)
7. DOSSIER RECHERCHE : GENERATEUR D'ENERGIE PAR GRAVITATION (Research Dossier: Gravitation Energy Generator)
8. DOSSIER ENQUETES (Investigations Dossier):
* CARCES le 10 Février 1975 (Var)
* O.V.N.I. sur la commune d'AOUSTE/SYE (Drôme)
9. UNE APPARITION ETONNANTE (An Astonishing Appearance)
10. J.C. BOURRET - J. GOUPIL PARMI NOUS (J.C. BOURRET - J. GOUPIL Among Us)
11. ZONES D'ACTION DES ENQUETEURS (Investigators' Areas of Action)
12. ENQUETE BULLETIN (Investigation Bulletin)

Key Articles and Sections

I - AVANT-PROPOS

This section, written by R. BONNAVENTURE, uses a fictional encounter with extraterrestrials who deliver a copy of the bulletin as a narrative device. It humorously suggests the beings are providing the publication as a service, hinting at their advanced nature and awareness of human curiosity.

2 - TRIBUNE LIBRE

This section features a letter from M. DORIER, a member from Romanais, addressed to Claude VORILLON, author of "livre qui dit la vérité." Dorier expresses his interest in extraterrestrial contact but voices concerns about the apparent lack of spiritual depth in their purported interests, which seem focused on material possessions and earthly pleasures rather than mental elevation. He questions whether some extraterrestrials might exploit human credulity for their own gain, seeking residences or simply to deceive. He requests further information on the transformation experienced by those who have had contact.

3 - DOSSIER TECHNIQUE - SURVEILLANCE PHOTOGRAPHIQUE DU CIEL

This technical dossier focuses on nocturnal surveillance for UFOs. It discusses the challenges posed by the varying speeds, sizes, and luminosities of UFOs for photographers. The article provides detailed advice on exposure settings, the limitations of automatic camera cells, and the necessity of specialized equipment like comparison photometers. It emphasizes the importance of using a tripod or stable support for long exposures to capture faint light sources and the movement of objects. The author distinguishes between the perceived "size" of an object and its actual optical diameter, noting that many UFOs appear as points of light. The section concludes with advice on using long exposures for fixed or mobile point-like objects and shorter exposures with telephoto lenses for objects with visible surfaces, stressing the need for stable equipment and appropriate film speed.

4 - DOSSIER OBSERVATIONS

This dossier presents a series of recent UFO sightings:

• November 23, 1974 - CLERIEUX (Drôme): A high school student observed a round, fire-colored object tracing an arc.
• December 4, 1974 - MONTPELLIER (Hérault): A couple observed a metallic object that changed shape and split into four oval discs.
• December 7, 1974 - MONTPELLIER (Hérault): A couple observed a spherical, whitish object with blinking red points.
• January 1975 - LAULNE (Manche): A young boy saw a saucer-shaped object with multiple stories and three legs. It took off vertically, moved horizontally, and disappeared with an ochre flame, leaving U-shaped and combustion traces.
• January 3-4, 1975 - SARAGOSSE (Espagne): A flying saucer reportedly landed in an air force training area.
• January 19, 1975 - Lac Scorch (Ontario, Canada): Four residents saw a bright object, three times the size of a star, moving west to east.
• January 24, 1975 - Méditer année face à Bandol: Two white luminous balls with dark sectors hovered for an hour before disappearing.

7 - DOSSIER RECHERCHE : GENERATEUR D'ENERGIE PAR GRAVITATION

This section is listed in the table of contents but its content is not provided in the scanned pages.

8 - DOSSIER ENQUETES

This section details investigations into specific cases:

• CARCES le 10 Février 1975 (Var): Mentioned as an exceptional observation for which testimonies are still being received.
• O.V.N.I. sur la commune d'AOUSTE/SYE (Drôme): No further details are provided in the scanned pages.

10 - J.C. BOURRET - J. GOUPIL PARMI NOUS

This section appears to be an article or report related to J.C. BOURRET and J. GOUPIL. The text following the table of contents on page 9 mentions a conference by these individuals in Annonay on January 24, 1975, which led to discussions about forming a regional delegation of the L.D.L.N. (Lumières dans la Nuit) in Haute Loire.

11 & 12 - ZONES D'ACTION DES ENQUETEURS & ENQUETE BULLETIN

These sections are listed in the table of contents. Page 9 contains a section that seems to be an article intended for local newspapers in Haute Loire, announcing the growing interest in UFOs and the establishment of a group in Langeac, in collaboration with AAMT and LDLN. It provides contact information for M. PEYRET G. in Langeac for those interested in the phenomenon or wishing to share testimonies.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the systematic investigation of UFO phenomena, the importance of photographic evidence, and the sharing of eyewitness accounts. The editorial stance, as expressed in Marc THIROUIN's quote from 1954, advocates for a scientific approach that embraces the possibility of the extraordinary while remaining critical of unsubstantiated claims. It encourages open-mindedness and a rejection of systematic skepticism, recognizing that what seems unbelievable today may become commonplace tomorrow. The association actively promotes the study of UFOs and encourages collaboration among researchers and enthusiasts, aiming to raise awareness and foster a deeper understanding of the phenomenon.

This issue of "Lumières dans la Nuit" (Lights in the Night), dated April 1975, is issue number 144. It primarily focuses on reporting and investigating numerous Unidentified Flying Object (UFO) sightings that occurred in France during February, March, and April of 1975. The magazine also includes a historical perspective on UFO phenomena and a theoretical scientific discussion.

Reported Sightings (February-April 1975)

February 1975

• February 9, 1975 - ST-ETIENNE (Loire): Two groups of witnesses, in different locations, observed a large, intense, dazzling white light that pulsed slowly and regularly. The light seemed to be situated in a field on the Guizay plateau, a site previously associated with landings.
• February 10, 1975 - ST-ETIENNE (Loire): The same groups saw the light again at the same location the next morning at 06:30, where it remained until they left for work.
• February 10, 1975 - MALMONT (Loire): An inhabitant of UNIEUX (near ST-ETIENNE) noticed a formation of 3 luminous points moving rapidly in the sky above Malmont village at low altitude, following a NE-SW trajectory. They moved in single file and were only visible for a few seconds. The trajectory, if extended, pointed towards Guizay.
• February 10, 1975 - ST-BARDOUX (Drôme): A high school student on a bus observed an egg-shaped white object moving N-S. The object multiplied into 4 others of the same shape as it accelerated and disappeared behind a church steeple. The object was estimated to be the size of a 7-8 seater plane.
• February 11, 1975 - ST-ETIENNE: A group of witnesses reported a phenomenon identical to previous sightings in ST-ETIENNE.
• February 17, 1975 - MEZILHAC (Ardèche): Several witnesses saw four luminous points and a red ball, which then separated, with two of them descending towards the ground.
• February 24, 1975 - AVIGNON (Vaucluse): Two young people observed a strong, stationary light in the northern sky for 15 minutes, described as "like two brilliant headlights that flashed." The object moved south, descending and leaving a yellowish trail. The report notes this might have been the conjunction of Jupiter and Venus.

March 1975

• March 1, 1975 - LE CHAMPEL (Ardèche): M. Serge V. and Melle Roselyne B. observed a red-flame light above the Montagne de Fons. It blinked and moved in leaps towards the hamlet "le Champel." As it approached, they distinguished 3 blinking luminous points in a triangular formation, seemingly connected and enclosed in a circle.
• March 25, 1975 - Quartier des Marcandières (Drôme): M. Paul R. observed a large white light, resembling a parachute, moving south then east, disappearing at about 300m from him. The luminous ball was estimated to be 4 meters in diameter.

April 1975

• April 10, 1975 - Comtat de Venaissin (Vaucluse): An attorney observed a small flying object, slightly larger than a star, moving slowly against the wind and leaving yellowish and red glimmers in its wake. It took between 45 minutes and 1 hour to disappear over the horizon.
• April 20, 1975 - ROANS (Drôme): M. J.C. observed a red Montgolfière-shaped object moving regularly at an estimated height of 150 to 200m above the Isère river.
• April 20, 1975 - VAISONS-LA-ROMAINE: A witness heard a noise like skidding tires and saw a large, bright orange ball of light illuminating a pine tree about 400-500m away. The light merged into the sky, becoming a point and disappearing towards the SE. A reddish trail persisted for some time.
• April 25, 1975 - European Skies: Multiple reports of UFOs and meteors were noted:
• Lille: A UFO was observed.
• Rouen: Phosphorescent craft were seen moving north.
• ST-Etienne de St-Geoirs (Isère): A green meteor with a white trail was seen from the control tower.
• Annecy and Lyon area: Similar observations were made.
• Boissis-le-Roi: Four people, including an engineer, reported an object moving horizontally, followed by red luminous points, stating it could not be a meteor.
• Hesse, Lower Saxony, and Westphalia (Germany): An object emitting green light with a long brilliant trail caused significant public emotion. Astronomical studies suggested a meteorite of 10-15 cm diameter disintegrating at 10 km altitude.
• Orly Airport: Personnel and two pilots observed a black object with a trail, but no results were found after investigation.
• April 27, 1975 - CHANOS CURSON (Drôme): Two witnesses observed a nebulous, white, metallic disk, lower than two passing jet planes.

Latest Information

• May 2, 1975 - LEZAY (Deux Sèvres): A UFO reportedly landed near the village school. Gendarmes witnessed a luminous ball, as large as a full moon, land. When one gendarme approached, the object, "shining with a thousand fires," took off with a noise like partridge flight.

Historical Observation

"A UFO in the Sky of Valence... It was in 1750"

This section details a historical observation from February 3, 1750, in Valence. It describes an extraordinary redness in the sky at dusk, followed by a brightness that seemed to glow. This phenomenon circled the northern part of the sky, ended in the east, and lasted until 9 PM. The event was witnessed by the entire population of Valence and its surroundings and lasted for three hours. The report notes that the weather was clear and the moon was waning. The article speculates whether this 1750 phenomenon paved the way for modern UFO sightings, referencing a 1975 sighting in Ardèche that disappeared in the direction of Combe-Laval, a location associated with previous UFO disappearances.

Scientific Discussion: "Energy Generator by Gravitation"

This article delves into the energy crisis and the potential of UFOs possessing advanced energy sources. It explores the hypothesis of a gravitational energy source on board UFOs, focusing on the concept of "black holes." The theory posits that as a mass is compressed, its escape velocity increases. If compressed to a point where the escape velocity equals the speed of light, it becomes a "black hole." The article discusses "micro black holes" with masses of 40 micrograms or 122 kg. It suggests that interactions with these micro black holes could produce emissions, potentially explaining observed cosmic radiation. The theory is presented as an alternative explanation for the 3mm radio emission filling the sky, which is currently attributed to the Big Bang.

The article outlines three potential phenomena predicted by this theory:

a) The superposition of spectral lines on the thermal emission curve, indicating quantized energy levels near the black hole.

b) Increased emission intensity in areas with more micro black holes, such as galactic nuclei or stellar black holes.

c) A contemporary origin for the characteristic radiation, which could be evidenced by further measurements.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently reports on UFO sightings with a neutral, investigative tone, often citing communications from regional delegates and investigators like M. P. BERLIER. There is a clear interest in documenting these phenomena, cross-referencing them, and exploring potential scientific explanations, however speculative. The inclusion of a historical case and a theoretical physics discussion suggests an editorial stance that seeks to understand UFOs from multiple perspectives, from eyewitness accounts to cutting-edge scientific hypotheses. The magazine also promotes its own publications and activities, such as the planned printing of an adhesive sticker.

This issue of Vues Nouvelles, identified as issue number 18, delves into speculative scientific theories and detailed witness accounts related to unexplained aerial phenomena (UFOs) and potential natural phenomena that might mimic them. The content explores the hypothetical interactions of micro black holes with Earth's atmosphere and presents several case studies of alleged UFO sightings.

Theoretical Explorations: Micro Black Holes and Atmospheric Phenomena

The issue begins with a theoretical discussion on the potential consequences of a micro black hole encountering Earth's atmosphere. It posits that a micro black hole with a significant mass (122 kg) could cause substantial atmospheric effects. The interaction with the dense gaseous medium of Earth's atmosphere is described as leading to increased gamma ray emissions, ionization of atoms, and the creation of plasma spheres. The article suggests that such phenomena might explain events like the 'meteorite' of Siberia in 1903. It also draws a parallel between these theoretical plasma spheres and descriptions of 'balls of light' often classified as UFOs.

The text further elaborates on the nature of micro black holes, explaining that once they accumulate a shell of charged particles, they become neutral and cease emitting energy. It introduces the concept of a 'super atom' and suggests that in a power generator context, such a micro black hole would become useless and require disposal. The article then links this to gravimetric studies at UFO landing sites, which have revealed slight increases in local gravity, implying that discarded micro black holes might have been left behind.

Case Study 1: Carces, France (February 10, 1975)

This section details an investigation into a sighting by M. F., an grocer in Carces (Var), France. The incident occurred on February 10, 1975, around 8:20 PM. M. F. observed a luminous object hovering over a field near the road. He reported that his car radio was jammed and then stopped. He described the object as being about 1 meter long and 2 meters high, with a black, matte finish. It had five or six rectangular windows and emitted an indefinable, yellowish, hazy glow from its rear, which he estimated to be its propulsion system. The object was described as being a single block without seams. The witness stated that the object did not move and there was complete silence. The investigation confirmed a strong magnetism on M. F.'s vehicle on the side facing the object, and the paint on that side had aged and become matte. The witness's dog also showed signs of distress when returning to the location.

Case Study 2: Aouste-sur-Sye, France (March 4, 1972)

This report details an observation by M.R. on March 4, 1972, around 10:00 PM. While with M.B., M.R. noticed an intense light in the sky, estimated to be between 260 and 300 meters high. Initially white, the light began to flicker and then moved slowly to the right. The witnesses drove closer, and the object reappeared as a red-orange ball moving in a sinuous path. It accelerated rapidly and disappeared. The entire phenomenon lasted approximately 15 minutes. The object was described as having a diameter of about 1 meter according to M.R., and 40-50 cm according to M.B. The investigation noted that the area is known for uranium deposits and ancient archaeological sites.

Case Study 3: Bayanne, France (Historical Account)

This section recounts an event that occurred thirty years prior, told by one of the witnesses, HM, a former pharmacist. HM and his doctor friend, Dr. D, were driving at night when they suddenly stopped. They both saw a religious figure, described as a nun carrying a lantern, crossing the path. The figure disappeared instantly, 'like an image fading away.' The report notes that the area of Bayanne had religious buildings. This event is compared to an article by Raoul Fouin discussing 'CVNI and space-time,' suggesting a possible temporal anomaly or contraction of space-time.

Conferences and Public Perception

The issue also covers a series of conferences organized by an association, featuring speakers J. Claude Bourret and Jean Goupil. These conferences, held in November 1974 and April 1975 in towns like St-Paul-3-Châteaux, Valence, Aubenas, and Annonay, aimed to raise public awareness about UFOs. The reports mention interviews with local press and television, and the conferences themselves were well-attended, with discussions sometimes touching upon religious subjects like the Fatima apparitions.

Editorial Notes and Reflections

The "N.D.L.R." (Note de la Rédaction) sections provide editorial commentary, clarifying technical terms and offering context. The investigators' notes in the Carces case emphasize the moral integrity and psychological state of the witness. The article concludes with a reflection on the importance of conducting and publishing such investigations, suggesting that they can offer valuable insights into the nature of reality and the possibility of phenomena beyond our current understanding, particularly concerning the '4th dimension' or time travel.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the speculative scientific explanations for UFOs, particularly involving micro black holes and their atmospheric effects, and the presentation of detailed, firsthand witness testimonies of unexplained aerial phenomena. The editorial stance appears to be one of open inquiry, encouraging the investigation and publication of UFO-related cases, while acknowledging the speculative nature of some of the theories presented. There is a clear emphasis on the credibility of witnesses and the thoroughness of investigations. The magazine also touches upon the broader public perception and discussion of UFOs through its coverage of conferences.

Title: LUMIÈRES DANS LA NUIT
Issue Date: April 1975
Publisher: Association des Amis de Marc Thirouin
Country: France
Language: French

This issue of "Lumières dans la Nuit" focuses on the "3rd Stage" of a series of events, specifically detailing a conference held in Romans on April 3, 1975. It also includes organizational information for investigators and a reader survey.

Conference in Romans (April 3, 1975)

The issue reports on a conference held in Romans on April 3, 1975, following a visit to a photography exhibition. The evening included an aperitif with local members and journalists, a private lunch with a journalist, a visit to the Charles JOURDAN shoe factories, and a reception hosted by the Mayor of Romans, M. DIDIER, attended by local press, the Gendarmerie, and police representatives. The day concluded with a communal meal and a final conference at the Foyer du Théâtre.

"LA CONFERENCE DU 3 AVRIL PAR J.C. BOURRET ET J. GOUPIL"

This section describes the conference as a success. It highlights that the reception by the Mayor of Romans, M. DIDIER, elevated the subject of UFOs beyond mere eccentricity, suggesting that when personalities show interest, it's more than just a trivial matter. A comparison is drawn to a similar event held in Bourg-de-Péage on April 5th of the previous year. The Bourg-de-Péage event revealed a difficulty among participants to accept concepts beyond "unidentified flying objects," particularly regarding "humanoids." The silence of the audience when asked about potential witnesses indicated a persistent fear of ridicule.

Atmosphere in Romans vs. Bourg-de-Péage

The atmosphere in Romans was notably different and more evolved than in Bourg-de-Péage. The presence of J.C. BOURRET, a speaker with a strong media profile (French Television), contributed significantly. BOURRET's ability to captivate the audience without relying solely on documents, and his experience from numerous prior presentations, helped in making even the most incredible ideas more acceptable by preemptively addressing common objections. The presentation of slides also gradually introduced the idea of "trans-terrestrial" creatures. The evolution of public perception is also attributed to media coverage, particularly articles by Jean-Louis RUCHON in "Le Dauphiné Libéré," which began to focus on the subject, moving it beyond mere jokes.

Audience Engagement and Discussion

The audience in Romans demonstrated finesse, broad-mindedness, and courage during the discussion. Instead of asking trivial questions about past observations, their remarks were insightful, touching upon concepts like space-time and parallel universes. The suggestions indicated a high level of understanding. Notably, when asked about finding witnesses, there was no awkward silence. Those who shared their experiences did so with common sense and clarity, debunking the notion that witnesses might confuse an airplane with the moon or a streetlamp.

Impact of Conferences

The success of the Romans conference is seen as a direct result of the energetic efforts of the organizers. The information they disseminate is gradually fostering a more mature public understanding of the subject. One year after the Bourg-de-Péage event, the progress is measurable, indicating that the initiative was worthwhile and is already yielding results. The organizers emphasize that this sensitization is not indoctrination but rather a process of educating the public to think more critically when better informed.

Investigator Zones and Procedures

II - ZONES D'ACTION DES ENQUETEURS

To manage the dispersion of members and the accessibility of regions, the Association has established a geographical breakdown of its operational areas. This aims to improve coordination among investigators and facilitate communication between members and investigators.

#### Principal Investigators and Zones

Each zone has a principal investigator responsible for a group of cantons. When an adherent learns of an interesting piece of information, they are to report it to the principal investigator of their zone, who will then decide on the necessary intervention measures for investigations.

#### Geographical Limits and Intervention

Investigation boundaries are flexible. If an investigation encroaches on another zone, the principal investigator of the affected zone must be notified. The Valence office (Tel. 43.53.48) is to be kept informed of all operations and can intervene directly if a case is deemed particularly interesting.

#### Recording Capabilities

The Association has the capability to conduct synchronized audio or video recordings, including synchronized interviews, thanks to a collaborator from FR3 Rhône-Alpes.

#### Investigator Resources

Each principal investigator is provided with a "enquêteur" (investigator's) handbook (published by "Lumières dans la Nuit"), a pocket goniometer, and questionnaires in two models (simplified and complete).

#### Reporting Requirements

• Following an investigation, a complete observation report is to be submitted, including:
• Completed questionnaire
• Photographs of the location
• Sketches of the location
• Written report from the witness or investigator
• Magnetic tape recording (if applicable)

This facilitates the creation of the investigation file and its transmission to other organizations or groups with whom the Association collaborates.

#### Specimen Bulletins

To leave a record of their visit, investigators are encouraged to give a specimen bulletin to the witness. The Association will now provide a series of 5 copies per issue to each principal investigator.

#### Improving Questionnaires

Recognizing the imprecision and insufficiency of current investigation questionnaires, the Association invites investigators to reflect on their content and suggest improvements.

Investigator Zones Detailed

The document lists 14 zones with their respective cantons and principal investigators:

• Zone I: Cantons of ANNONAY, ST-VALLIER, SATILLIEU, SERRIERES. Principal Investigator: ACHARD Marcel.
• Zone 2: Cantons of LE GRAND SERRE, ROMANS, ST-DONAT, TAIN. Principal Investigator: VINCENT Luc.
• Zone 3: Cantons of BOURG-DE-PEAGE, LA CHAPELLE-EN-VERCORS, ST-JEAN-EN-ROYANS. Principal Investigator: FIGUET Michel.
• Zone 4: Cantons of LAMASTRE, ST-AGREVE, ST-FELICIEN, TOURNON. Provisional responsibility of Valence.
• Zone 5: Cantons of CHABEUIL, LORIOL, ST-PERAY, VALENCE, VALENCE Nord, VALENCE Sud, VERNOUX, LA VOULTE. Permanence and principal investigators: DUQUESNOY David and BONNAVENTURE Raymond.
• Zone 6: Cantons of BOURDEAUX, CREST Nord, CREST Sud, SAILLANS. Principal Investigator: PERALDO Jean-Paul.
• Zone 7: Cantons of CHATILLON-EN-DIOIS, DIE, LUC-EN-DIOIS, LA MOTTE CHALENCON. Provisional responsibility of Crest.
• Zone 8: Cantons of LE CHEYLARD, CHOMERAC, PRIVAS, ST-MARTIN-DE-VALAMAS, ST-PIERREVILLE. Principal Investigator: JOFFRE Alain.
• Zone 9: Cantons of DIEULEFIT, GRIGNAN, MARSANNE, MONTELIMAR, ROCHUMAURE, VIVIERS. Principal Investigator: BLACHER Noël.
• Zone 10: Cantons of ANTRAIGUE, AUBENAS, BURZET, COUCOURON, LARGENTIERES, MONTEZAT, THUEYTS, VALGORGE, VILLENEUVE-DE-BERG. Principal Investigator: HONNORE Jean-Claude.
• Zone 11: Cantons of BOLLENE, BOURG-ST-ANDEOL, PIERRELATTE, ST-PAUL-3-CHATEAUX, VALLON-PONT-D'ARC, BOLLENE. Provisional responsibility of Montélimar and Vaison-la-Romaine.
• Zone 12: Cantons of BUIS-LES-BARONNIES, NYONS, REMUZAT, SEDERON, VALREAS, VAISON-LA-ROMAINE. Principal Investigator: TRUPHEMUS Jacques.
• Zone 13: Cantons of JOYEUSE, ST-ETIENNE-DE-LUGDARES, LES VANS. Provisional responsibility of Zones 10 and 11.
• Zone 14: Triangle BOLLENE - VAISON-LA-ROMAINE - SAULT, delimited by SAULT, CARTRAS, AVIGNON, VIGHON, ORANGE, BOLLENE. This zone is currently unassigned.

Bulletin Survey

12 - ENQUETE BULLETIN

The Association is requesting feedback from its readers to improve the "bulletin." The survey aims to encourage reflection on the bulletin's creation and to gather ideas for enhancing its distribution and content. Readers are asked to participate by providing their reactions, which will guide future improvements.

Acknowledgements

• Thanks are extended to various individuals and groups for their contributions, including:
• Authors: BOZZONETTI, CHALOIN, DORIER, DUQUESNOY, MONIERIE.
• Contributors: BLACHER, FIGUET, HONORE, PERALDO.
• Friendly organizations: L.D.L.N., A.D.E.P.S., G.E.C.A.G., S.O.B.E.P.S., G.E.E.P.C., S.V.E.F.S.
• Well-known ufological personalities: NAHON-C, J.C. BOURNET, J. CHASSEIGNE, H. DURRANT, J. GOUFIL, F. LAGARDE, Dr M. PAGES, G. TATADE, R. VEILITH.

The Association expresses its commitment to meeting reader expectations with the bulletin, emphasizing that it is a bulletin, not a review, and relies on the modest resources of the Association.

Survey Questions

The survey includes questions on:
1. Age
2. Membership status (adherent, subscriber, free recipient)
3. Issues read
4. Reading habits (all articles, every other, leafing through)
5. Interest level in various topics (regional/national observations, investigations, technical aspects, library, research, free tribune, in-depth articles)
6. Desire for new sections
7. Specific suggestions for new sections
8. Willingness to write articles

Readers are asked to return the completed questionnaire to the Association des Amis de Marc Thirouin at 29, rue Berthelot, 26000 VALENCE.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring theme is the ongoing effort to educate the public about UFO phenomena and to professionalize the investigation process. The editorial stance is one of serious inquiry, aiming to move the subject from the realm of jokes and ridicule to one of considered public interest, supported by media coverage and official engagement. The Association emphasizes its modest means but dedicated efforts in disseminating information and improving its methods through feedback and collaboration.

This document is a reader survey from issue 9 of the French ufology publication, UFO Contact. It is primarily composed of questions designed to gather feedback on the bulletin's content, readership habits, and engagement.

Reader Feedback Survey

The survey begins by asking for an overall assessment of the bulletin, providing a scale from 'Très satisfaisant' (Very satisfied) to 'Médiocre' (Mediocre), with an option for 'Sans opinion' (No opinion).

Following this, readers are prompted for 'Vos suggestions, vos critiques ?' (Your suggestions, your criticisms?), inviting open-ended feedback.

The survey then delves into how readers interact with the bulletin physically: 'Que faites-vous du bulletin.?' (What do you do with the bulletin?). The options provided are: 'Je le garde en collection' (I keep it for collection), 'Je le prête à des amis' (I lend it to friends), 'Je le donne à des amis' (I give it to friends), and 'Je le jette' (I throw it away).

A question about the desire for multiple copies follows: 'Voulez-vous plusieurs exemplaires du même numéro (indiquer dans les deux cas votre chiffre)' (Do you want multiple copies of the same issue (indicate your figure in both cases)). This is broken down into 'pour les vendre' (for selling) and 'pour les donner' (for giving away), with space to indicate a quantity.

Finally, the survey assesses the readership's engagement with the broader ufology community: 'Lisez-vous régulièrement des revues ufo-logiques ou des bulletins de groupements' (Do you regularly read ufology magazines or group bulletins?). Readers must answer 'OUI' (YES) or 'NON' (NO). If the answer is 'yes', they are asked 'Si oui, lesquels ?' (If yes, which ones?), prompting them to list the specific publications they follow.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The primary theme is reader engagement and feedback, indicating an editorial stance that values subscriber input for improving the publication and understanding its audience. The questions suggest a desire to maintain a loyal readership and potentially expand its reach through word-of-mouth or sales by subscribers. The focus on ufology magazines and group bulletins also highlights the publication's place within a specific niche community.