UFO Informations - No 06 - janv-fev 1975

Magazine Overview

Title: UFO INFORMATIONS
Issue Date: January-February 1975
Issue Number: 6
Publisher: Association des Amis de Marc THIROUIN
Country: France
Language: French
Price: 2.50 F.

This issue of UFO INFORMATIONS, the bulletin of the Association des Amis de Marc THIROUIN and the COMMISSION D'ENQUETES SUR LES O.V.N.I., is dated January-February 1975 and is the 6th bimonthly issue. The cover features a stylized illustration of a UFO and the headline "SPECIMEN".

Editorial

The editorial, signed by R. BONNAVENTURE, discusses the association's efforts since January 1974 to inform the public in the Drôme, Ardèche, and Vaucluse regions about mysterious aerial and ground phenomena. Over this period, 17 debate sessions on "UFOs: A Serious Affair" and two exhibitions were organized, including a conference by J.C. BOURRET and J. GOUFIL on "Flying Saucers and Public Opinion." The editorial notes the positive participation of the local press and expresses gratitude to journalists. It highlights a growing openness among the local population to report sightings without fear of ridicule. The association's goal is to continue its research to gain more knowledge and advance the understanding of the phenomenon, encouraging participation from scientists, researchers, and enthusiasts.

Tribune Libre

This section includes an article titled "D'UN MEMBRE ROMANAIS" by M. André CHALOIN, a Honorary Member of the Association. Chaloin reflects on how historical ignorance attributed unexplained phenomena to the devil, referencing place names in the Vercors region. He questions why people are reluctant to accept testimonies of strange aerial and ground objects, suggesting that scientific knowledge might need re-evaluation when faced with contradictory facts. He poses the question: when a fact contradicts a theory, should one ignore the fact or revise the theory?

Study of a Mini UFO Research Station

Authored by Jean BEDET, a member of A.D.E.P.S., this article details the development of a "mini station de recherche O.V.N.I." The EB3 prototype, an evolution from the 1973 EBI model, is described as an apparatus that records three physical "on/off" parameters. It features a metal cylinder that rotates over a month-long paper roll, with three ink-tipped needles inscribing detector responses. The mechanical clockwork has been improved, and the paper is calibrated for time. The station is portable, measuring 240x160x260 mm, and can connect to three detectors. A 6V battery is sufficient for power. The station provides a record of detector activity, allowing for analysis of events during absence. The article includes a diagram of the station and provides contact information for purchasing the equipment.

Photographic Surveillance of the Sky

This section, written by Michel MONNERIE of Résufo (Réseau de Surveillance Photo du Ciel), outlines the importance of photographic surveillance and provides practical advice. Monnerie, who has eight years of experience with Résufo, emphasizes the need for regional and national cooperation in research. He thanks the association for their trust and reiterates that his role is primarily coordination, relying on the efforts of others. He advises members to use cameras with adjustable diaphragms and focus, and to be prepared for unpredictable phenomena by having cameras pre-set. Recommendations are given for film sensitivity (100-200 ASA for black and white) and camera settings for daytime and nighttime observations. The article stresses that isolated photos have little value without a thorough investigation of the circumstances surrounding the sighting. It also encourages photographers to include terrestrial reference points in their shots for scale and context.

Dossier Observations: Phenomenon of February 10, 1975

This section compiles several UFO sighting reports from February 10, 1975, across different departments in France. These include:

• Region of Annonay: Multiple luminous phenomena were observed around 7 AM. Investigations are ongoing.
• Saint-Étienne de Valoux: A restaurateur observed a luminous ball followed by smaller balls moving North to South for a few seconds.
• Region of Tournon (Commune of Lemps): An student witnessed six disk-shaped objects with tails moving from North-Northwest to South-Southeast for one minute. One object was larger than the others.
• Region of Romans: Two construction workers reported a water-green object, the size of a basketball, followed by five smaller round objects moving horizontally from North-Northwest to South-Southeast for 5-10 seconds.
• Gessans: Joël P. observed an orange egg-shaped object followed by multi-colored sparks for a few seconds.
• Génissieux: Abbé Pierre R. and four companions observed an object described as a comet-like tail, followed by a flattened white oval object, and then an explosion with falling flaming debris, moving from North-Northeast to South-Southwest for 10-15 seconds. A diagram illustrates the object's presumed dimensions (300m) and trajectory.

Library and Other Sections

The table of contents also lists "Bibliothèque" (Library) and "La Catastrophe du Barrage de Malpasset (Var)" and "Observation à la Martinique en 1965" as other articles, though their content is not provided in the scanned pages.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently promotes the serious investigation of UFO phenomena, encouraging public awareness and open-mindedness. It advocates for rigorous research methods, including photographic documentation and detailed witness testimony. The editorial stance appears to be one of scientific inquiry, urging readers to consider evidence even when it challenges conventional understanding. There is a strong emphasis on the importance of organized investigation and the sharing of information among researchers and the public.

This issue of L'ÉCHO DES MYSTÈRES, Volume II, Number 10, dated February 1975, is published by A.D.E.P.S. and focuses on UFO (OVNI) phenomena, with a particular emphasis on sightings in France and a speculative link to the Malpasset dam disaster. The magazine presents detailed witness testimonies, preliminary analyses, and explores scientific concepts like infra-sound.

Sightings in the Royans Region

The issue details several sightings in the Royans region. On page 4, a cultivator near Romans observed a moon-sized, neon white, ovoïde object moving east with a trail, followed by sparks resembling an explosion. The trajectory was North-Northeast to South-Southwest, with an observation duration of 15 seconds.

In Saint-Nazaire-en-Royans, two gendarmes observed a spherical object, estimated at 1 meter in diameter, glowing like the setting sun, surrounded by a luminous crown and emitting sparks. It was followed by a trail of decreasing circles and moved horizontally at helicopter speed for 20 seconds before disappearing behind a hill. The trajectory was North-South.

Near Saint-Laurent-en-Royans, seven individuals saw a round, neon white object, larger than the apparent diameter of the moon, with a cone-shaped luminous trail. It moved at an estimated altitude of 500 meters, disappearing behind a rock.

Sightings in the Valence Region

In Granges-les-Valence, a witness observed a uniform green-orange ball, estimated to be the size of a tennis ball at 15 meters, with a fine white tail similar to a jet plane's. The observation lasted 12 to 15 seconds on a North-South trajectory.

In the Diois region, a gendarme and two railway workers observed a 30 cm diameter ball followed by fragments, moving South-West. The observation duration is currently unknown.

An additional report from Bourg-les-Valence mentions a lockkeeper observing a spindle-shaped object with blurry contours moving west.

Two truck drivers near Fortes-les-Valence also reported observing a ball.

Preliminary Analysis of the Phenomenon

The magazine provides a preliminary analysis based on incomplete data. The general direction of the phenomena is North-South, with variations attributed to lack of reference points and witness distance. Object shapes are variable but overlap in sectors. Observation durations are generally under a minute, often around ten seconds. Some objects were seen against a mountainous background. The Diois observation is noted as potentially placing the North-South trajectory.

Malpasset Dam Disaster and UFOs

A significant portion of the issue (pages 15-17) connects the Malpasset dam disaster of December 2, 1959, to UFO phenomena. The article details the catastrophic failure of the dam, which was considered a marvel of technology. Despite extensive investigations, no conventional cause (geological, sabotage, etc.) was definitively proven. The official conclusion pointed to infiltration of rainwater causing pressure buildup. However, the magazine posits that UFOs, with their advanced propulsion systems, could be responsible. A witness anonymously recounts an event on the day of the disaster where a television broadcast was interrupted by a power outage, and a large red ball was seen descending behind the houses, suggesting a possible link.

The article hypothesizes that vibratory effects from UFO engines, possibly infra-sound, could have caused the dam's rupture. It references a case from J. Allen Hynek's work where a metallic top-shaped object landing caused violent vibrations in a nearby signpost. The magazine explains infra-sound as low-frequency sound waves that can propagate with minimal attenuation and have significant effects on materials and living organisms. It cites experiments by Professor Gavreau demonstrating the destructive potential of powerful infra-sound sources, suggesting that a sufficiently advanced UFO could easily cause such effects.

Other Information and Features

Astronomical Conjunction

An attention note mentions the conjunction of Venus and Jupiter on February 17, 1975, which some witnesses reportedly misinterpreted as a UFO phenomenon.

A.D.E.P.S. Information

The magazine thanks E. Jean-Louis Pala for a newspaper clipping about the disintegration of a satellite (Saliout III, Titan D, Skylab, or meteorite). However, confirmation from the Toulouse Space Center suggests it was not a satellite reentry.

Numerous observations were reported in the Jura, Lyon, and Briançon regions.

A.D.E.P.S. requests members to mobilize and communicate any relevant facts about the mysterious phenomenon of February 2, 1975, for future publication.

Books and Periodicals

The issue includes a "Bibliothèque" section listing recent books on occultism, ancient civilizations, and astronomy, as well as a list of articles from various scientific and ufological periodicals such as "Sciences et Avenir," "Sciences et Vie," "La Recherche," "Pilote Privé," "Journal T.A.M.," "Lumières dans la Nuit," "Inforespace," and "Ufo Info."

UFO Observation Event

A.A.M.T.-A.D.E.P.S. is organizing an observation vigil for April 12, 1975, urging participants to bring necessary equipment and submit detailed reports.

UFO Propulsion Research

The work of Yvan Bozzonetti is mentioned, particularly his book "La propulsion des soucoupes volantes - Enigme résolue?" which addresses questions about UFO luminosity, their adherence to geographical features, silent movement, and propulsion systems.

Sighting from a Submarine

On page 18, a detailed report describes a UFO sighting in September 1965 near Fort-de-France, Martinique. While on duty aboard the submarine "Junon," the witness and other crew members observed a luminous white neon disc or sphere, apparent size of the moon, moving slowly. The object left a trace in the sky. The sighting occurred at 21:15 and was observed again at 21:45.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are UFO sightings, the investigation of unexplained phenomena, and the exploration of potential scientific explanations, including the effects of infra-sound. The editorial stance appears to be one of open inquiry, encouraging detailed reporting and analysis of UFO events, and daring to propose unconventional hypotheses, such as the link between UFOs and the Malpasset dam disaster. The magazine actively promotes citizen participation in observation networks and research.

This issue of "Lumières dans la Nuit" from the first quarter of 1975, published by the Association des Amis de Marc Thirouin, focuses on two detailed investigations into Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) sightings. The publication is French, and the issue date is approximated as January 1, 1975, based on the legal deposit date.

Investigation in Fort-de-France, Martinique

The first case, documented with a diagram and timeline, describes an observation near Fort-de-France, Martinique. The phenomenon was observed arriving from the South at 21:15. It disappeared into a white halo at 21:20, departed after the halo formed at 21:45, and the entire event concluded at 21:50. The object was noted to have described two loops and left two fine red traces below the halo, described as being very rapid, like rocket flames.

The witness, identified as M. FIGUET, an investigator for A.A.M.T. and L.D.L.N., detailed the sequence of events. The object descended, described two loops, and then stopped in a stationary position, forming a white halo around itself. During the observation, binoculars were used and distributed among companions. The red traces were observed beneath the halo and were very fast. The object then vanished within its halo, similar to a power cut. The halo and the red traces remained visible for another minute before disappearing.

At 21:45, the white halo reappeared in the same location and height, and the object's center became illuminated. It then ascended, repeating the same two loops and horizontal trajectory towards the Panama Canal in Central America.

The witness noted that while cameras and photographic equipment were available, no one thought to retrieve them, suggesting a collective focus on observing the phenomenon. He speculated that the object was guided or tele-guided by intelligent beings.

The following day, a quartermaster at the naval base also reported the sighting, leading to a decision to contact the meteorological observatory for other potential witnesses. Another witness contacted confirmed it was not a meteorite, airplane, rocket, ball lightning, or satellite, concluding it was a C.V.N.I. (Objet Volant Non Identifié - Unidentified Flying Object). The observation occurred under clear skies with calm seas, a temperature of 20°C, and zero cloud cover. This sighting is placed within the context of the 'wave of 1965'. Notably, two days after the event, discussions about the phenomenon ceased.

Investigation in Privas, Ardèche, France

The second investigation, conducted by J.C. HONORE, also an investigator for A.A.M.T. and L.D.L.N., details an observation made by M. Louis C. in Privas on December 16, 1974, between 19:00 and 19:10. The witness, who wished to remain anonymous, was a well-educated controller at the Mutualité Sociale Agricole.

The observation was prompted by an article in the newspaper 'Le Dauphiné'. The witness described a very intense light directed towards the mountains opposite his house. Initially thinking it was a fire, he quickly realized it was not. The light was described as blinding and shaped like a semi-circle, 'as if traced with a compass'. In the center, there was an even more intense, blinding light, shaped like a candle flame or the light from a welding arc, which was immobile and white. The entire luminous arc was also fixed.

Above this, a fixed red point was observed, detached in the darkness. The witness could not confirm if it belonged to the same phenomenon, but it disappeared when the main phenomenon vanished.

He considered the possibility of it being a star, but its disappearance along with the main phenomenon ruled this out. The light from the phenomenon seemed 'enclosed' within the semi-circle, but at its base, it illuminated trees on the mountainside, while the rest was in darkness.

Believing others might have seen the same thing, he noted a landmark to pinpoint his observation. The phenomenon was located perpendicular to his neighbor's window, about 150 meters away. It disappeared horizontally in less than a second, moving into the distance. The red point above also vanished, leading him to conclude it was part of the same event.

Notes from the investigator indicate the witness used the term 'sidéré' (stunned) to describe his experience. The observation was directed Northeast-Southwest, and the phenomenon disappeared in the Southwest direction.

Secondary effects on the witness included his eyes watering due to the luminosity. More significantly, during the discussion, he revealed suffering from headaches and insomnia, which he and his wife confirmed began on the day of the observation. He had previously attributed these symptoms to cholesterol, for which he was being treated. He was surprised to realize the onset coincided with the UAP sighting. The investigator stresses that this reflection was not prompted by him and was a spontaneous realization by the witness.

The witness is described as not being a fan of science fiction and more Cartesian in nature. He has read articles about UAP in popular magazines and is now convinced that strange things happen at night.

Witness Entourage

The witness's wife and 20-year-old daughter became interested in UAP phenomena after his sighting and did not doubt his account. They reported observing a similar phenomenon a few days later, in the same direction but slightly to the right. For two consecutive nights, they watched a luminous point in the sky, the size of a star, which disappeared behind the mountain as if a star was falling.

External Investigation and Dimensions

An external investigation noted that the area of observation had numerous sources, a television relay, and ruins according to the topographical map. The geological map indicated numerous faults near the observation site.

Estimations of the phenomenon's dimensions suggest the base of the semi-circle was larger than the neighbor's window, located 150 meters away. The arc was estimated to be 20 to 30 meters wide. Using a goniometer, the witness estimated the 'window' to be 6 mm, which, when projected at distances of 4000 to 6000 meters, gave a diameter of 40 to 60 meters for the phenomenon. The dotted lines on the diagram, drawn by the witness, suggest he assumed the phenomenon was hidden by the slope.

Bureau Composition and Publication Details

The issue also lists the composition of the bureau for the year 1975 for the "Association déclarée conformément à la Loi du Ier Juillet 1901 Délégation régionale de Lumières dans la Nuit." Key figures include President David DUQUESNOY, Vice-President Marc REVEILLARD, Secretary-General Raymond BONNAVENTURE, and others. Raymond BONNAVENTURE is also listed as the Director of Publication. The publication was printed in France by the Association on a duplicator at 29, rue Berthelot, Valence. The legal deposit was made in the first quarter of 1975.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are detailed UAP sightings, witness testimonies, and the investigative efforts of organizations like A.A.M.T. and L.D.L.N. The editorial stance appears to be one of serious inquiry into anomalous aerial phenomena, presenting detailed accounts and attempting to corroborate them through external investigation and witness interviews. The publication aims to document and analyze such events, treating them as potentially significant occurrences.