UFO Fenomener Over Norge - 1983 - No 1

Magazine Overview

Title: UFO FENOMENER OVER NORGE
Issue: 1
Volume: 1
Date: 1983
Publisher: Norsk Institutt for Vitenskapelig Forskning og Opplysning (NIVFO)
Country: Norway
Language: Norwegian

This issue of 'UFO Fenomenener Over Norge' is the first volume and issue of a publication by the Norwegian Institute for Scientific Research and Information (NIVFO). It presents the institute's official stance on phenomena related to the UFO debate. The magazine is edited by Jan S. Krogh and is published 2-4 times a year. The publication uses a coding system for press references, detailing the date, type of article, journal number, newspaper, and clipping size.

Articles and Reports

UFO in Hessdalen: Several reports cover the intense public interest in Hessdalen, including a TV team from the USA and a photographer's experience. While some articles describe sightings and the ongoing mystery, others offer skeptical viewpoints. One report mentions that Rolf D. Tønset's pictures are considered forgeries. Jason Bratt, a UFO hunter, has visited Hessdalen and plans to return, though he has not yet seen anything.

• Sightings Across Norway: Numerous sightings are reported from various locations in Norway:
• Alta: A large luminous sphere with smaller spheres and a luminous tail was observed.
• Dokka: Two strong red light flashes were reported by a student and his classmates.
• Terberget: A star-colored light was observed moving slowly.
• Hamar: A persistent reddish light was seen moving in a zig-zag course.
• Lyngenfjorden: A sharp light was seen, and the car's headlights inexplicably turned off and on.
• Solbergfjorden: An object with blinking lights, changing color, was observed.
• Gildeskål: A cylindrical object with a smoke-like tail was seen.
• Slagen: A light was reported but later identified as helicopters.
• Ofoten: A luminous object descended towards the ground, and car lights were affected.
• Balestrand: A bright light, compared to the moon, was observed.
• Stokmarknes: A sharp bluish light was seen behind mountains.
• Kvinedal: An oblong object with lights was observed.
• Sunndalsøra: A faint oval object was seen flying upwards.

• Analysis and Commentary:
• Willy Brevik philosophizes about future space travel possibilities.
• A NTB report mentions Soviet scientists not denying a connection between UFOs and extraterrestrial civilizations.
• Anneli Borg writes about her grandmother's observation of a star-colored light.
• The Hessdalen UFO kiosk, run by local women and the sports team, has temporarily closed.
• Odd Savik suggests a military explanation for the Hessdalen phenomena, citing the military's lack of statements.
• A mysterious light near Borge, Lofoten, was investigated but later attributed to searchlights from a boat.
• Asbjørn Hallan suggests that UFO hysteria in Hessdalen might be due to superstition and inbreeding in remote areas, leading to visual hallucinations.
• A metallic cylinder fell from space in Macae, Brazil, and is being examined by military authorities.
• Ingvald Svinsaas, author of 'I grenseland', is hesitant to take a stance on UFOs.
• Willy Johnsen of NIVFO urges UFO researchers to be more practical and seeks sober information.
• Leif Havik of UFO-Norge and Professor Rolf Brahde of the University of Oslo discuss UFOs. Havik emphasizes Hessdalen, while Brahde remains skeptical, believing all cases have rational explanations.
• A film titled 'Hangar 18' is recommended, based on a book by Charles Berlitz.
• A Hollywood film about aliens taking over Earth is mentioned.
• K. Stenødegård of NIVFO comments on UFO magazines, concluding that objective information is scarce.

• Specific Incidents and Explanations:
• The 'Hessdalen syndrome' is discussed, with one commentator suggesting that while some may be joking, the events warrant serious attention.
• A report suggests a UFO might be a human-made object, specifically a de-iced trigonometric point.
• The possibility of Soviet nuclear missiles being involved in some sightings is raised.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently presents a mix of reported sightings and skeptical analysis. While acknowledging the phenomena and the public's interest, there's a clear effort to provide rational explanations, often pointing to misidentifications, natural phenomena, or psychological factors. The Hessdalen phenomenon is a recurring focus, highlighting both the mystery and the diverse reactions it elicits. NIVFO, as the publisher, appears to maintain a stance of cautious investigation, seeking factual information while also considering the possibility of more mundane explanations. The publication encourages sober reporting and analysis, distinguishing itself from sensationalist UFO magazines.

Title: UFO-Aktuelt
Issue: 2/1983
Volume: 1
Publisher: UFO-Norge
Country: Norway
Language: Norwegian
Date: February 1983

This issue of UFO-Aktuelt delves deeply into the ongoing UFO phenomenon, with a significant focus on the controversial Hessdalen case. It presents a range of reports, debates, and analyses from various perspectives, including scientific explanations, eyewitness accounts, and the differing views of UFO organizations.

Key Articles and Reports

Hessdalen Phenomenon: Theories and Controversies

The central theme of this issue revolves around the Hessdalen sightings and the attempts to explain them. Professor Rolf Brahde, an astrophysicist, is prominently featured, proposing that the UFOs observed in Hessdalen are primarily caused by atmospheric reflections of train lights on the Rørosbanen. He likens these phenomena to fata morgana and mirages, suggesting they are not unique and can be observed in desert regions. Brahde also opens the possibility of other light sources, such as cars or headlights, being responsible.

However, Brahde's theory is met with strong resistance. The residents of Hessdalen are described as being deeply offended and dismissive of his explanations, using terms like "mektig irritert" (mightily irritated), "vanvittig" (insane), and "tull og tøys" (nonsense). They argue that the timing of the sightings does not always align with train schedules.

Kolbjørn Stenødegård from NIVFO (a Norwegian organization for UFO research) also expresses disagreement. While acknowledging that Brahde's models might fit older UFO cases, he insists they do not apply to the Hessdalen situation. Stenødegård states that NIVFO has been observing Hessdalen for a year and completely dismisses the train reflection theory. He also criticizes the dismissal of the famous McMinnville photos as fake, suggesting that the Hessdalen phenomena are also not resolved.

Leif Havik from UFO Norge also challenges Brahde's theory, finding little evidence to support it. He points out that American sources suggested the Soviet telegram about UFOs was related to scientific seriousness, a point he feels is not being addressed. Havik suggests Brahde should visit Hessdalen himself.

UFO Sightings Across Norway

Beyond Hessdalen, the magazine reports on numerous other UFO sightings from various locations in Norway:

• Arendal: Hans Aas reports on a couple seeing a round, luminous object flying west of the city. Later, another report mentions a similar object seen from Eydehavn and Natvig, with observations aligning well.
• Uenes: Ken Caswell observed an object over Uenes, similar to one seen over Kvinesdal.
• Near Airfield: An inquiry was made for more observers of an event near an airfield.
• Hovmester'n Fritidsklubb: Objects seen on a Tuesday evening were identified as hot air balloons made of silk paper, fueled by methylated spirits, and lasting 10-15 minutes.
• Totenåsen: Annar Millerud described a large, luminous object with a smoky tail, appearing very large in the sky.
• Nes: A woman saw blinking green and red lights and a sharp white light, possibly an exercise aircraft from Gardermoen.
• Dahli: A large fireball with a smoke trail was seen at night.
• Ulriken: A tourist reported seeing yellow, red, and blue colors shoot out of the sky.
• Bodø/Bertnes: A couple saw an object over Bertnes, coinciding with a strong whirlwind on Hunstadmoen.
• Våler: Three adults and a child saw a white light hovering, blinking, and moving slowly.
• Sandsøy: Aksel Morritsen saw two luminous spheres near mast height over the sea, moving like a medium-sized boat.
• Leirskogen/Tisleidalen: Three men saw strong lights combined with smoke, possibly a Red Cross helicopter.
• Sør-Aurdal/Begnadalen/Bagn: People reported seeing luminous objects with strong lights, causing fear.

UFOs and Religion

Cand. philol./lektor Gunnar Christensen explores the connection between religions and speculation about life on other planets. He posits that ufology bases its belief on the idea that extraterrestrial beings can save humanity from nuclear war. Christensen suggests these UFO beings are technologically and spiritually advanced and reside on other planets. He identifies George Adamski as a founder of this 'religion' and notes that while most UFO groups distance themselves from Adamski, Christensen's views are based on limited literature. He also touches upon the idea that the Christian worldview may not align with scientific understanding.

Organizational Dynamics: UFO Norge vs. NIVFO

The issue highlights the differing approaches and sometimes conflicting statements between UFO Norge and NIVFO. While UFO Norge, through Leif Havik and Leif-Normann Solhaug, seems more aligned with advocating for the seriousness of UFO phenomena and criticizing the scientific community's dismissal, NIVFO, through Kolbjørn Stenødegård, focuses on debunking and analyzing evidence, often taking a more critical stance towards claims and explanations.

Other Notable Content

• Hangar 18: A film is discussed, with K. Stenødegård of NIVFO deeming it based on a dubious account from the USA.
• UFO-forelesning: A lecture at Lørdagsuniversitetet in Trondheim focused on Hessdalen.
• UFO-team from Sweden: A group from Sweden visited Hessdalen for observations.
• Humorous Takes: An opinion piece by 'Adrian' humorously suggests renaming the Rørosbanen the 'UFO-express' and giving conductors space-themed uniforms, linking it to Brahde's theory.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently presents a platform for reporting UFO sightings and discussing the phenomena, often highlighting the skepticism of mainstream science and the passionate advocacy of UFO organizations. There's a clear tension between those seeking scientific explanations (like Brahde) and those who believe the phenomena are genuinely unexplained or even extraterrestrial in origin (like UFO Norge). The editorial stance appears to be one of open inquiry, presenting different viewpoints while also critically examining claims, as seen in the detailed critiques of Brahde's theories and the analysis of photographic evidence. The issue also touches upon the growing tendency to view UFOs through a quasi-religious lens, reflecting a broader cultural interest in the topic beyond mere sightings.

The magazine seems to aim to inform its readers about the latest developments in UFO research and sightings within Norway, fostering a community of interest and debate around these often-unexplained events.

This issue of UFO-Norge, dated March 1980, delves into a variety of UFO sightings and related discussions across Norway. The magazine features numerous short reports from different regions, often citing local newspapers and eyewitness accounts. It also includes commentary and analysis from individuals associated with UFO research organizations.

Key Articles and Reports

UFO over Lakselv?
Several individuals reported seeing a light that moved higher and then disappeared like a luminous corkscrew. The event was brief, lasting only seconds.

<Gatefulle UFO-er> og Ufologer (Grateful UFOs and Ufologists)
K. Stenødegård of NIVFO comments on L. Tønnesen's previous article, noting Tønnesen's belief in UFOs. Stenødegård states that NIVFO, unlike UFO associations, aims to collect claims about paranormal phenomena to find factual basis. He criticizes typical ufologists for forming fixed opinions based on UFO literature and media reports, leading them to theorize extensively without sufficient evidence. Stenødegård points out that scientists and leading UFO organizations now doubt the 'spaceship theory,' and psychologist C.G. Jung suggested in the 1960s that 'close encounter' reports might have psychological causes.

Rart lys sett over Græsbeget (Strange light seen over Græsbeget)
Helga Seterberget and four children observed a stationary light in the western sky that appeared as three lights close together through binoculars. Seterberget suggested it might have been a planet, and no aircraft noise was heard.

Sovjetiske vitenskapsmenn og UFO-rykter (Soviet scientists and UFO rumors)
K. Stenødegård comments on Leif Havik's contribution, suggesting that the UFO situation in the Soviet Union might have changed overnight. He notes that UFOs are a discussed topic in the Soviet Union, with the public consuming rumors. Stenødegård believes the regime tolerates this as a safety valve for ideological deviations. He mentions that there are few 'UFO researchers' in the Soviet Union and that transliterations of Soviet surnames can vary. Stenødegård thanks 'ufolog' Havik for mentioning NIVFO and suggests that aspiring ufologists should note down information about various initiatives worldwide.

Fire av ti nordmenn tror på UFO (Four out of ten Norwegians believe in UFOs)
An advertisement for the book "Mystikk og Mysterier" (Mysticism and Mysteries) by "Det Beste" (The Best) is featured. The ad references a survey by Norsk Opinionsinstitutt indicating that 40% of Norwegians believe flying saucers exist, and 30% believe in extraterrestrial life. The ad suggests that this confirms impressions gained from working with these topics, implying people believe in many things.

UFO over Mehamn
On Tuesday morning, people first saw a sharp light that rotated at low altitude over the eastern sky above Mehamn.

Når kan menneskene konstruere <UFO-er)? (When can humans construct UFOs?)
Johannes Wallestad, a service worker, offers thoughts on when humans might construct UFO-like spaceships, concluding that a special lightweight metal would be necessary.

UFO'er
The newspaper recommends that people with strange observations contact NIVFO, which has personnel in Northern Norway collecting and comparing UFO observations.

UFO var ballong (UFO was a balloon)
A report suggests that what was seen over Mo in the previous year was likely a weather balloon. Jan Krogh of NIVFO states that the object was a weather balloon brought into the center of Mo.

Mystisk over Seljord lørdag morgen (Mysterious over Seljord Saturday morning)
Retired carpenter Arne Bekkevold saw a mysterious flying object hovering over Seljord on Saturday morning, moving horizontally or slightly downwards. It appeared to be a solid object with a smoke trail. The report notes that many across the country mentioned smoke trails in their reports at that time.

Mange lys på himmelen (Many lights in the sky)
The newspaper's main editorial office received three independent phone calls reporting three luminous spheres moving southwest. One caller mentioned a trailing object. The control station at Fornebu reported a plane flying in the same direction. A woman from Grue Finnskog may have seen the same lights as Helga Seterberget. The newspaper questions if anyone is sending up balloons with live lights.

UFO over Arendal for 200 år siden (UFO over Arendal 200 years ago)
A historical account from "Kongelig Privelegeret Adresse Contoirs Efterretninger" in 1769 or 1770 describes an observation made with a spyglass. A strong fog appeared, followed by an observation of the sun with spots that seemed to move. The phenomenon became invisible later. Arne Mjäland found this notice on microfilm.

Lys på himmelen (Lights in the sky)
A strange light phenomenon was observed simultaneously from Lillestrøm and surrounding areas on Wednesday evening, February 2nd. UFO-Norge had no explanation.

Ukjent metall på Sandhornøya (Unknown metal on Sandhornøya)
A strange metal was found in a quartz quarry on Sandhornøya. Geological expertise could not determine its composition.

Satelitter med lysende haleheng over Vessia? (Satellites with luminous tails over Vessia?)
Åse Andersen saw three 'satellites' moving from Hovenga towards Vestsiden. One object resembled an airship with a large luminous tail.

UFO-sjefen i Nord-Norge (The UFO chief in Northern Norway)
An interview with Leif Normann Solhaug, head of the UFO department for Northern Norway, who joined UFO-Norge. He discusses his interest in UFOs stemming from local newspaper articles and his task of evaluating reports. He mentions that the Northern Norway UFO department has 40 members, with the national organization having around 600.

UFO over Flakvarp
Observers on Stridsklev reported seeing planes. Journalist Kolbjørn R. Thorsen described a luminous phenomenon that seemed to rotate, appearing elongated like a millipede and then like a badminton shuttlecock. A smaller luminous object was also seen. Åse Andersen has seen similar phenomena for three weeks, possibly related to the weather. She believes it might be a satellite. A boy on Stridsklev reported seeing a similar phenomenon and believes UFOs should be taken seriously.

Satefulle UFOer og ufologer (Rainy UFOs and ufologists)
L. Tønnesen disagrees with K. Stenødegård's explanation of some UFO reports as hallucinations. Tønnesen notes that UFOs have been registered on radar and mentions that researchers have stated that particles faster than light could change our understanding of science.

Gass og lyn lite sannsynlig, mener dosent: Vinden tok myrflaket på Skogvoll (Gas and lightning unlikely, says lecturer: Wind took the peat bog at Skogvoll)
An article discusses a peat bog that moved several meters without visible signs of machinery. UFO-Norge suggested a UFO might have moved it, but dosent Karl Dag Vorren believes it was due to frost heave and drying, with strong winds moving the loosened peat bog.

Billys borte, blå mane og bokstaver på himmelen (Billy's gone, blue mane and letters in the sky)
Leif Normann Solhaug reports UFO sightings over Solbergfjorden, Bodø, Stokmarknes, Birtavarre, and Alta.

Odd Svendsen så gjenstanden midt på lyse dagen (Odd Svendsen saw the object in broad daylight)
Odd Svendsen and two others saw a silver-colored object resembling a parachute but much larger, moving slowly towards Stavern. It suddenly moved and disappeared. They contacted the Air Force and local authorities. Svendsen described the object as silver-blank with a flaked top and a silver-blank, reddish-purple lower part. He believes this sighting, occurring in daylight, rules out the satellite theory.

Sterkt lysende gjenstand sett på Raufoss lørdag (Strongly luminous object seen at Raufoss Saturday)
A woman saw a bright light that illuminated her room. Looking out, she saw a slow-moving, orange, somewhat angular object that resembled a flying object, not an aircraft. After passing a rooftop, it split into one large and two small parts, which appeared to fall near the railway line.

UFO-bølge over Nord-Norge (UFO wave over Northern Norway)
An article by Leif-Normann Solhaug discusses recent reports from Northern Norway.

Merkelig lys i Søgne (Strange light in Søgne)
A couple saw a light resembling a large blinking star over Lunde school, which disappeared with a green light trail. They wonder if it was the same phenomenon seen in Hortemo.

UFO-flap over Nord-Norge
This appears to be a continuation of the article on UFOs in Northern Norway.

UFO-en over Mehamn var sovjetisk rakett (The UFO over Mehamn was a Soviet rocket)
Jan Krogh of the Norwegian Institute for Scientific Research and Information (NIVFO) suggests that the light seen over Mehamn and Lakselv was likely a Soviet rocket passing over Kola. NIVFO received information about the rocket from Svenska Rymd AB. Krogh states that the institute works to counter pseudoscientific research, particularly from UFO clubs.

<Flygende tallerkener er landet> (Flying Saucers Have Landed)
This is a review of a book by George Adamski and Desmond Leslie, criticizing it for presenting both clear forgeries and unexplained UFO images. The review notes that the Adamski saucer is presented as a Venusian flying saucer and the 'Lubbock lights' as a formation of spaceships, calling the review somewhat uncritical.

UFO-observasjoner og togpasseringstider (UFO observations and train crossing times)
Knut Aasheim criticizes Asbjørn Hallan's contribution and claims Professor Brahde made a mistake at a lecture in Trondheim by not checking train schedules.

UFO-feber i nord (UFO fever in the north)
Based on a press release from 'UFO-Norge' Nord-Norge, the newspaper contacts Jan Erik Solheim at the Nordlys Observatory to understand the scientific perspective on UFOs. Solheim defines UFO as 'Unidentified Flying Object' but acknowledges that many UFO reports can be explained.

UFO observert? (UFO observed?)
Hans A. Helgeland saw a kite-shaped object over Konnerudkollen with white lights along the edges and colored lights inside. He suggests it might be related to illuminated apartments.

<Jeg har sett UFO> (I have seen a UFO)
Following a previous article, the magazine received more reports. Gina Kolby saw an oval object over Drammensfjorden. C.H. from Rjukan saw a globe-like object covered in glass facets. Rune Denstad reported seeing a cigar-shaped object. Leif Havik of UFO-Norge has personally observed phenomena but is unsure of their nature. K. Stenødegård of NIVFO mentions that personnel with photographic and measuring equipment have been stationed in Hessdalen, and NIVFO hopes to host debates on various theories.

Gatefulle UFO'er og ufologer (Grateful UFOs and ufologists)
K. Stenødegård responds to Tønnesen's previous letter, suggesting that only 'third-degree' close encounters might be psychological. He also states that radar observations are unreliable and the spaceship hypothesis lacks support, even among well-known ufologists.

Uvitenhet om UFO (Ignorance about UFOs)
Terje Johansen expresses frustration with Hallan's contribution, stating it's better to remain silent than to speak foolishly.

Mange har observert lysende gjenstander (Many have observed luminous objects)
Many have seen light phenomena over Drammen. Randi Wang saw a crystal-shaped luminous object that moved slowly and took the form of a disk. It remained stationary for two hours before moving northwest. The light returned later. This occurred four days after an observation from Strømsøasen.

Egil Monn-Iversen og Sølvi Wang er ikke i tvil: VI SA EN UFO! (Egil Monn-Iversen and Sølvi Wang are not in doubt: WE SAW A UFO!)
In 1965, Egil Monn-Iversen and Sølvi Wang saw two star-sized objects for about an hour while driving from Elverum to Oslo. The lights were low over a ridge. Monn-Iversen believes these objects were controlled by a will and that UFO sightings will become more common, eventually revealing their true nature. Sølvi Wang is more skeptical.

UFO-ar berre luft i lufta? (UFOs just air in the air?)
This article discusses a US Air Force investigation that found 1/5 of observations could not be explained. Soviet scientists Andrei Monin and Georgij Baremblatt have proposed an explanation for 'flying saucers' involving layered environments in the atmosphere and ocean, creating 'internal waves' that can form visible patches. These patches, when capturing dust, can resemble flying saucers. However, this theory does not fully explain all atmospheric phenomena attributed to flying saucers.

Lysende <juletre i Rødøy (Luminous 'Christmas tree' in Rødøy)
A father and son in Tjongsfjord, along with a woman in Svinvar, saw a luminous object descending into the sea. It appeared to be about 3-400 meters above the sea, with pulsating colors. After half an hour, the lights faded and disappeared. NIVFO later determined this was an observation of the planet Venus.

Skogvoll-saken pány (The Skogvoll case revisited)
Jan S. Krogh of NIVFO Nord comments on Leif-Normann Solhaug's article, expressing surprise that Solhaug believes UFOs were present at Skogvoll. Krogh disputes the claim of a 'UFO wave' in the region and questions the qualifications of individuals speaking to the public about aerial phenomena.

De gatefulle UFO'er <UFO-Riigets> tilstand (The Grateful UFOs The State of the 'UFO Kingdom')
Hans Aass summarizes the state of the Norwegian UFO scene since the establishment of the first nationwide UFO organization in 1972. He questions Stenødegård's motives and suggests he might be trying to discredit UFO-Norge. Aass finds it intriguing that no one can definitively prove or disprove UFO claims.

På tråden (On the line)
An caller asks how the mountain board will handle military personnel participating in a large exercise in the Holtalen district, concerned about snowmobile use by UFO hunters.

On UFO'er og meninger (On UFOs and opinions)
Knut Aasheim criticizes Stenødegård for comparing NIVFO to the American organization 'Committee for Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal,' which Aasheim believes makes numerous claims in its eagerness to debunk UFO events. Aasheim categorizes 'psycho-UFOs' as 'abductions' within third-degree encounters.

UFO over Halden?
A family in Gimle saw two reddish spheres surrounded by blinking lights moving from the fortress towards Rokke.

Kommunestyrevedtak om UFO (Municipal council decision on UFOs)
A municipal council meeting in Holtålen decided that UFO observations should be officially documented. The council members attempted to observe a UFO but saw nothing unusual. Thus, the council did not officially record any UFO sightings.

Om aviser, debatt AKP og UFO-tilhengere (On newspapers, debate AKP and UFO followers)
J. A. believes that the AKP party receives too much attention in the newspaper and that the editor spends too much time debating with the party. J.A. recounts an experience in the military with a UFO enthusiast who became enraged when others suggested UFOs were mere fantasy.

UFO-flap over Nord-Norge?
Regional leader Jan Krogh of NIVFO comments on Leif-Normann Solhaug's article, questioning where the flying objects seen over Northern Norway originated. He requests observers to report sightings from airports and advises skepticism towards claims from certain sources.

Jervell og Tusberg i UFO-bok (Jervell and Tusberg in UFO book)
This is a review of a book by Arne Wisth, describing his 'misadventures' earlier in life. The review is humorously written, suggesting that UFOs are both Wisth and not Wisth.

Hva er dette? (What is this?)
This section discusses new, supposedly fake, Tønset photos. NIVFO suggests they were created by photographing a dark triangle with a light background through a window with an out-of-focus camera. Another image shows a disc-shaped light against a dark background, possibly created using a child's rattle and thread.

Religionsblanding og <off-beat litteratur> (Religious mixing and <off-beat literature>)
Adm. leader K. Stenødegård of NIVFO agrees with Lektor Gunnar Christensen's point about a growing gap between established science and ordinary people. He notes that those offering 'heavy unexplainable phenomena' are becoming producers of 'pseudo-science.' Stenødegård states that NIVFO was established to be a critical instance for such literature and hopes more critical voices will emerge.

UFO'er og utologer (UFOs and ufologists)
Hans Aass questions how Stenødegård can hold opposing views on ufology compared to his 1979 stance and believes Stenødegård misquotes science.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently features reports of UFO sightings across Norway, ranging from lights in the sky to more structured objects. A central theme is the debate between scientific investigation and ufology, with organizations like NIVFO and UFO-Norge presenting differing perspectives. NIVFO, represented by figures like K. Stenødegård and Jan Krogh, generally adopts a skeptical stance, seeking natural explanations and critiquing pseudoscientific claims. UFO-Norge, represented by individuals like Leif Normann Solhaug, appears more open to the possibility of unexplained phenomena. The magazine also touches upon the psychological aspects of sightings and the public's fascination with UFOs, as evidenced by survey results. There's a recurring tension between those who believe UFOs are real, unexplained phenomena and those who attribute them to known causes or psychological factors. The editorial stance seems to lean towards a critical examination of UFO claims, encouraging scientific rigor while acknowledging the persistent public interest in the subject.

This document is a collection of press clippings from early 1983, compiled by NIVFO (Norsk Institutt for UFO-forskning, or Norwegian Institute for UFO Research), detailing UFO sightings, reports, and related discussions primarily within Norway. The clippings cover a period from January to March 1983 and showcase a vibrant, and at times contentious, discourse surrounding the UFO phenomenon.

Key Articles and Reports

UFOs in Hallingdal and Beyond

The issue opens with Kjell Hoftun's philosophical reflections on UFOs and the possibility of extraterrestrial life, prompted by a March observation near Gol. Hoftun categorizes UFOs into terrestrial, alien unmanned, and alien manned craft. He contrasts these with the NIVFO/UAP definition and calculates that even with advanced technology, travel from Proxima Centauris would take 16 years, leading him to conclude that humanity might be alone on Earth.

The Hessdalen Phenomenon

A significant portion of the clippings revolves around the Hessdalen phenomenon. Journalist Arne W. Wisth is frequently mentioned for his book, "UFO mysteriet i Hessdalen." Wisth presents his personal curiosity as the motivation for writing the book, and despite a moderate portrayal of events, he leans towards believing the phenomena originate from space until proven otherwise. He is also quoted as believing the Hessdalen phenomena are controlled by intelligences and has seen a solid object within the corona of a light, dismissing the ionization theory. Wisth's work and views are met with both interest and criticism from various UFO organizations.

Sightings and Observations

Numerous specific sightings are reported:

• Helgeroa: Grete Berg, Margareth Pedersen, and Marit Einarsen observed a red light resembling a falling aircraft with no sound. This experience led Berg to reconsider her skepticism about UFOs.
• Fauske: A man reported witnessing the 'birth' of a sphere, though NIVFO found no serious basis for the claim.
• Eidsvoll: A request is made for a 10-year-old who reported seeing a UFO on a Tuesday evening.
• Drammen: UFO reports over Drammen in February-March are often explained as aircraft approaching Fornebu airport or satellites illuminated by the sun.
• Porsgrunn: Elbjørg Fjellberg of UFO-Norge suggests that observations on February 16th and 17th were likely of Venus.
• Ofoten: An 11-year-old in Narvik reported a very bright light, stronger than a star, which the airport suggested might be a helicopter or marker light.
• Bodø: Military radar detected an object, which NIVFO investigated. While the SAS/Widerøe case was initially attributed to 'ducting' (atmospheric conditions affecting radar), NIVFO's investigation, after speaking with the SAS captain, concluded the object was not visually or radar-detected from the plane, suggesting ducting was the likely explanation for the radar anomaly.
• Nordsjøen: Ulf Renberg recounts an observation made with the crew of KNM Oslo during a NATO exercise.
• Drivdalen: Margit Vognild saw a light similar to one reported by Odd Wolden, described as red in front and yellowish behind.
• Saltdal: A luminous sphere, initially mistaken for a star, was identified by NIVFO as the planet Venus.

UFO Organizations and Debates

The clippings reveal a dynamic between different UFO organizations, notably NIVFO and UFO-Norge. Leif-Normann Solhaug of UFO-Norge expresses frustration with what he calls 'skittkasting' (mud-slinging) he perceives in submissions to UFO-Norge and questions NIVFO's affiliations. Kolbjørn Stenødegård, leader of NIVFO, criticizes the proliferation of 'meaningless and uncritical literature' on UFOs and takes issue with Arne Wisth's book, calling it 'nothing more than an interesting account.' Stenødegård aims for NIVFO to establish a critical stance on UFO phenomena, distinguishing it from what he terms 'kvasipreget, villedende, profitt-jagende, fordummende, spekulativ og sensasjonell' literature.

International Context

An article citing the American newspaper 'Globe' suggests that Norway is 'paralyzed by fear of a UFO invasion.' The report, based on Arne Wisth's book, quotes Len Stone describing Norwegians as fearful of an extraterrestrial invasion. It also mentions claims attributed to Leif Havik, head of Norway's UFO watch force, about seeing numerous flying saucers. The article criticizes the American newspaper for distorting facts and making false claims, such as NRK being instructed to issue an invasion warning.

Skepticism and Evidence

Photographer Rolf Tonset defends his UFO photos, stating he has taken around 25 usable pictures since 1965 and that they are not mere sensationalism. However, the article notes that if his photos are genuine, they are indeed sensational and stand out from other Hessdalen images according to NIVFO.

Fredrik Skagen, author of a crime story for NRK radio, used the Hessdalen UFOs as inspiration, leading to listener calls with ideas.

A poll asking 'Do you believe in UFOs?' reveals varied responses: two outright reject the problem, one is convinced, and the rest are doubtful, with most associating UFOs with spaceships.

Technical and Scientific Aspects

One report details the analysis of quartz samples from Marnes, which primarily contained iron. Another discusses a case from the Condon report (1957) involving a U.S. Airforce B-47 crew who reportedly observed and radar-tracked an object. Finn W. Kalvik of UFO comments on Stenødegård's assertion that there are no reliable radar observations of UFOs, presenting this case as evidence, though noting the partial nature of the Condon report and the experimental frequency used.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this collection of press clippings are the reporting of UFO sightings across Norway, the ongoing debates and differing interpretations among UFO research organizations (primarily NIVFO and UFO-Norge), and the critical examination of evidence and claims. The editorial stance, as represented by NIVFO's contributions, leans towards a more scientific and critical approach, seeking to debunk sensationalism and provide rational explanations where possible, while acknowledging the existence of unexplained phenomena. There is a clear tension between those who embrace UFOs as evidence of extraterrestrial intelligence and those who advocate for rigorous investigation and skepticism.

Title: NIVFO DIA PRESSEKLIPP
Issue: 1. kvartal 1983 (1st Quarter 1983)
Publisher: NIVFO (Norsk Institutt for Vitenskapelig Forskning og Opplysning)
Country: Norway
Language: Norwegian

Content Summary

This issue of NIVFO DIA PRESSEKLIPP provides a comprehensive statistical report on cases handled by NIVFO during the first quarter of 1983. The publication details a significant number of reported incidents, categorized and analyzed to provide insights into aerial phenomena and other unexplained events.

Statistical Overview

The magazine includes a detailed percentage breakdown of case classifications for the first quarter of 1983. The most prominent category is 'A1 (Foreløpelig ingen konklusjon)' (Preliminary no conclusion), accounting for 28.9474% of cases. Following this is 'D1 (Jardisk)' (Earthly), which represents a substantial 55.2632% of the reported incidents. 'D2 (Astronomisk)' (Astronomical) cases make up 10.5263%, while 'D3 (Meteorologisk)' (Meteorological) and 'E1 (Psykologisk)' (Psychological) cases each constitute 2.63158%. Other categories, such as 'Utilstrekkelige informasjoner' (Insufficient information) and various 'Ikke identifiserte' (Unidentified) classifications, show zero reported cases for this period.

Case Listings and Classifications

The publication features extensive lists of reported cases, detailing the 'Sak' (Case ID), 'Fylke' (County), 'Sted' (Location), 'Tidspunkt' (Time/Date), and 'Klassifikasjon/Ársak' (Classification/Reason). These lists span across multiple pages, documenting specific sightings and events from various locations throughout Norway.

For instance, on page 2, a case from Alta on January 1st, 1983, is classified as 'D1 Rakett' (D1 Rocket). Another case from Stokmarknes on June 1st, 1983, is classified as 'A1'. A report from Hamar on September 20th, 1983, is classified as 'D1 Romskrap' (D1 Space Debris). The data includes a wide array of classifications, such as 'D1 Helikoptere' (D1 Helicopters), 'D1 Fly' (D1 Aircraft), 'D1 Fiskebåt' (D1 Fishing Boat), 'D1 Ballong' (D1 Balloon), 'D1 Satelitt' (D1 Satellite), 'D2 Stjerneskudd' (D2 Meteor Shower), and 'D3 Hvirvelvind' (D3 Whirlwind).

Page 3 continues this detailed listing, cross-referencing cases and providing further location and classification data. For example, a case from Finnmark (Alta) is classified as 'D1', while a case from Oppland (Dokka) is also 'D1'. Cases from Nordland appear frequently, with various classifications like 'A1', 'D1', and 'D2'.

Geographical Representation

Pages 5 and 6 offer visual representations of the reported cases. Page 5 presents a grid map showing the distribution of 'Rapporterte Saker Totalt' (Total Reported Cases) based on latitude and longitude coordinates, indicating areas with higher concentrations of sightings. Page 6 displays maps of Norway, including Svalbard, Jan Mayen, and Dronning Maud Land, with symbols indicating 'X = UAP' (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena), 'O = ULØST SAK' (Unsolved Case), and ': = LØST SAK' (Solved Case). This visual data helps to identify geographical hotspots for reported phenomena.

About NIVFO

Page 7 provides an overview of NIVFO itself. It explains that NIVFO is the Norwegian Institute for Scientific Research and Information, an organization dedicated to spreading scientific understanding of pseudoscience and conducting research in related fields. The central administration is located in Trondheim, with regional offices in Tromsø, Harstad, Ålesund, Arendal, and Oslo. NIVFO collaborates with individuals possessing qualifications in various fields, including psychology, electronics, astronomy, and literature, with the goal of studying phenomena that are not sufficiently illuminated by current science. They aim to act as a link between science and the general public. NIVFO is a privately funded enterprise and has international representation in countries like Brazil, Luxembourg, France, Austria, and Germany, and works with institutions in Belgium and the USA. In Norway, they cooperate with numerous institutions. NIVFO is particularly interested in individuals with diverse interests to join their organization, emphasizing that special qualifications are not required. The organization publishes six different types of publications, including numerous booklets and reports, and offers courses to train volunteer staff. NIVFO has specialized in the research of aerial phenomena for 20 years and plans to expand its research in 1984 to include pseudopsychology, astrology, and telepathy.

Contact Information

Contact details for NIVFO are provided, including addresses and telephone numbers for their offices in Harstad, Oslo, and Trondheim.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring theme throughout this issue is the systematic collection, classification, and statistical analysis of reported aerial phenomena and other unexplained events in Norway. NIVFO's editorial stance is one of scientific inquiry into phenomena that lie outside conventional scientific understanding. They aim to objectively study these subjects, providing factual information to the public. If information is found to lack scientific validity, NIVFO states its intention to clearly inform the public about this, as indicated by the notable quote: "If we believe that this information does not meet scientific standards, we will inform about it."