UFO Brigantia issue 38

Magazine Overview

Title: UFO BRIGANTIA
Issue: No. 38
Date: May 1989
Publisher: IUN. PUBLICATION.
Type: A Journal of UFO Investigation

Editorial

The editorial discusses the prevalence of extraterrestrial claims, particularly focusing on the 'body horror' ufology trend and abduction reports. It critiques the reliance on anecdotal evidence and the claims of 'implants' found in abductees, citing an interview with Budd Hopkins in the International UFO Reporter (IUR). The editor expresses skepticism towards claims lacking concrete proof, such as those based on hypnosis alone or unverified 'alien hardware'. The editorial also touches upon the influence of science fiction on ufological ideas and the tendency to accept 'authority' without question.

The IUN

The Independent UFO Network (IUN) was established in 1987, emerging from previous UFO groups. It operates as a non-dogmatic, free-floating pool of researchers. The IUN emphasizes freedom of information and assists other researchers. They hold no fixed viewpoint on the nature of the UFO enigma but may playfully critique strange beliefs. The IUN is involved in Project Pennine, a long-term study of anomalous light phenomena in the Pennine region.

Contents

The issue features a variety of articles including an editorial, Barnsley Photos- Exposed, The DULCE Papers, Updates from the States, Letters to the Editor, Welsh 'UFO' Crash?, New Scientist, CSICOP & UFOs, and Castaneda's Worlds.

BEARD'S BARNSLEY BUBBLE BURSTS!

This lengthy article by Philip Mantle details the investigation into four photographs allegedly taken by Peter Beard in Barnsley on August 5, 1987, showing a UFO over rooftops. Initially, the photos gained attention through a local newspaper article. Investigators from IUN/BUFORA became involved. Early analysis by Nigel Smith suggested a cut-out, but professional photographer Tony Marshall noted the absence of a 'halo effect' typical of models. Dr. Bruce Maccabee in the US also examined the photos. However, discrepancies in Mr. Beard's story emerged, such as changes regarding the camera jamming and the object's movement. The article highlights that Timothy Good initially believed the photos and photographer were genuine.

The turning point in the investigation was a computer analysis conducted by Ground Saucer Watch (GSW) in Phoenix, Arizona. Despite previous attempts in the UK failing, GSW performed an evaluation using computer image enhancement. The GSW report, dated January 23, 1989, concluded that the photographs were "most likely the result of a paste-on photo technique." Key findings included the out-of-focus nature of the object relative to the window, inconsistent density variations, and a strange linear boundary suggesting a pasted feature. The analysis also pointed out inconsistencies in the object's movement as described by Beard, casting doubt on his narrative.

GSW provided a total of sixteen photographs for analysis, with photos A and D being published in UFO Brigantia. The report stated there was "no evidence which substantiates the claim that an extraordinary flying object was photographed under these conditions." The article concludes that the case is a hoax, emphasizing the need for constant vigilance against such hoaxes to maintain credibility in ufology.

Aftermath

Following a Daily Star article reporting the Barnsley photographs as a hoax, Peter Beard contacted Philip Mantle and Andy Roberts, refuting the claims. He had not seen the full GSW analysis but insisted it was not a hoax. Beard stated the negatives would be sent to two English computer analysts. The IUN also sent the negatives to another analyst for a second opinion. The article acknowledges that proving hoaxes can be difficult unless the perpetrator admits guilt. However, the weight of contradictory evidence, particularly the GSW analysis pointing to a paste-up, leads the IUN to conclude the case is a hoax unless substantial contrary evidence emerges.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue of UFO Brigantia exhibits a critical and investigative stance towards UFO claims, particularly those involving photographic evidence. The editorial and the detailed analysis of the Beard photographs demonstrate a commitment to rigorous examination and a healthy skepticism towards sensational claims. The magazine appears to prioritize evidence-based conclusions over anecdotal accounts or unsubstantiated theories. There is a clear emphasis on debunking hoaxes and maintaining the credibility of UFO research by not accepting dubious evidence at face value. The IUN's policy of 'total freedom of information' is presented alongside a willingness to 'poke fun' at strange beliefs, suggesting a balance between open inquiry and critical assessment. The recurring theme of photo analysis and the potential for hoaxes is a significant focus, highlighting the challenges and importance of verifying evidence in ufology.

This issue of UFO BRIGANTIA from May 1989, titled "<<11>> THE DULCE PAPERS," presents a collection of controversial and speculative information related to UFO phenomena, alleged alien activity, and government secrets. The editorial introduction sets a tone of presenting 'weird' and 'official' documents without extensive commentary, suggesting the reader should draw their own conclusions from the 'ufology we deserve.' The magazine covers several distinct topics, including the alleged Dulce Base in New Mexico, the assassination of John F. Kennedy, and a UFO event in Wales.

The Dulce Papers

The core of this section is the presentation of "The Dulce Papers," described as comprising 25 black and white photos, a video tape without dialogue, and technical papers concerning an alleged jointly occupied US/Alien facility located one kilometer beneath the Archuleta Mesa near Dulce, New Mexico. The information was reportedly shared with several individuals for safekeeping. One person, who was shown the contents but lacked technical expertise, wrote a description of what was seen and depicted in pencil drawings.

This account details the aliens' objectives and methods, including the use of cattle blood for nourishment, where aliens absorb atoms. It is stated that aliens are not just interested in food but are altering the DNA of cattle and humans. The concept of a 'Type One' creature is introduced as a lab animal created to be an 'almost human being' using animal tissues and computer-stimulated memory, with this creature being slow and clumsy. Real humans are used for training, experimentation, and breeding with these 'almost humans.' Some humans are kidnapped and completely utilized, while others are kept alive in large tubes filled with amber liquid. Brainwashing is also mentioned as a method to distort truth.

A more detailed description is given of a breeding program involving humans. Male humans with high sperm counts are kept alive, their sperm used to alter DNA and create a non-gender being called 'Type Two.' This sperm is grown and altered, then placed in large wombs, with many destroyed. Certain beings are altered again and placed in separate wombs. These 'ugly humans' resemble normal beings when fully grown, which takes only a few months. They have a short lifespan, less than a year. Female humans are used for breeding, and many women experience sudden miscarriages after about three months of pregnancy, sometimes without realizing they were pregnant.

The fetus resulting from this process is used to mix DNA in types one and two. The atomic makeup of this fetus is half human, half 'almost human,' and it cannot survive in the mother's womb. It is taken at three months and grown elsewhere.

The papers also discuss copper, molybdenum, magnesium, and potassium, along with 'medical terms' and diagrams. Ultra-violet light and gamma rays are mentioned, as are methods for avoiding detection through specific colors.

Updates From The States

This section, edited by Jim Melesciuc, editor of Orbiter, presents several reports and commentary on UFO-related events and claims circulating in the US.

GRUDGE 13 COMMENT

This part discusses an elusive "GRUDGE 13 report" that was allegedly never made public. Bill English, a farmer, claims the US government is hiding extraterrestrial beings and maintains relocation and debriefing colonies for people who have experienced CE-3 or CE-4 encounters. English reportedly provided analysis on this report while serving in the US Army. The article notes the increasing incorporation of Dr. J. Allen Hynek's name into these accounts, with Lear and English claiming Hynek studied autopsy reports of dead entities. This is contrasted with a statement by Jennie Ziedman, Hynek's assistant, who stated Hynek once mumbled that an object appeared to be under intelligent control. Dr. Jaques Vallee is quoted as saying Hynek had no doubt about the anomalous origin of UFOs, yet Vallee also notes Hynek never found convincing evidence of UFO existence.

A case from 1956 at White Sands Missile Test Range is recounted, involving Sgt. Lovette and Major Cunningham. Sgt. Lovette was reportedly dragged into a saucer by a snake-like object and later found mutilated, with his tongue, eyes, anus, and genitalia removed, and his blood drained. The article notes the absence of vascular collapse and mentions dead predatory birds in the area.

Another case, the 'Darlington Farm Case' from October 1953, describes the abduction of a 13-year-old boy in front of his parents. The boy was carried into a fiery object, and his dog was found with its head crushed. The Air Force allegedly relocated the parents to a special zone.

The report also claims to contain detailed descriptions of autopsies performed on captured dead entities, with numerous photographs allegedly taken.

JFK & THE ALIENS

This segment connects the assassination of John F. Kennedy to alien technology and a conspiracy. According to Lear, the US Secret Service agent driving Kennedy's limousine assassinated him using a revolutionary 'boomerang bullet,' likely of alien technology, because Kennedy was shot in the back of the head. The motive is stated to be Kennedy's insistence on being told the secrets of MJ-12.

John Lear and the MJ-12 Documents

Jim Melesciuc addresses John Lear and his work, noting that Lear is lecturing widely and presenting material that is considered questionable. Melesciuc states that Lear's claims, including those related to the MJ-12 documents, are not credible and that some documents are outright hoaxes, as warned by Bill Moore. Lear is described as having been in the UFO field for less than two years, and the article emphasizes that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

Stan Friedman is mentioned as investigating the truth of MJ-12 with donated funds. Bill Moore, however, issued an open letter reversing his earlier claims about the authenticity of the MJ-12 documents, stating that their genuineness remains an open question.

New Magazine

The magazine "Caveat Emptor" has returned to circulation after a 14-year hiatus, revived by Gene Steinberg. It covers UFOs, ancient astronauts, and paranormal subjects. The issue reviewed includes an interview with James Moseley.

Abduction Doubts

This section critically examines the work of abduction proponents like Dave Jacobs and Budd Hopkins. It points out that many investigators use medical procedures without a license. Hopkins's reliance on hypnosis is questioned, as it might not hold up in court. Michael Swords and Jacques Vallee are cited for raising critical issues about abductions and the unlikelihood of extraterrestrial hybridization. The article notes that abduction proponents are reacting defensively to criticism, and suggests that the lack of presented evidence makes their claims difficult to prove.

Stuff

A brief advertisement for "The Fly-By-Night Report" by David Clarke is included, detailing sightings in South Yorkshire in 1987/88. It is described as a regional study of a UFO flap, featuring witness accounts, newspaper clippings, and official documents.

Letters to the Editor

Several letters from readers are published, offering diverse opinions and experiences.

• A.J. (shades of William S. Burroughs!) thanks the magazine for the latest issue and expresses amusement at a letter purportedly from 'Alan Staithes.' This reader notes a pattern among contactees of being told to stop eating sweets and chocolates, drawing a parallel with John Lennon's interviews where he mentions a hypnotherapist who claimed contact with beings from outer space and linked communication with 'Martians' to eating ice cream buns. The reader questions the significance of this detail and whether it relates to brain-sugar triggers for hallucinations.
• The same reader comments on the John Lear article, finding it diverting but ultimately unconvincing. They suggest that while parts might be true, the material also contains elements of disinformation and is structured to shock and provoke, comparing its technique to pornography.
• Ian Blake, Doncaster expresses skepticism about 'weird' UFO theories, particularly those involving psychic or paranormal biases. He recounts a story about two thugs castrating a toddler, which he believes is invented for shock value, and applies this assessment to the pronouncements of John Lear, calling it 'modern folklore.'
• Editors comment responds to Ian Blake, agreeing with his assessment of the Lear material and stating that much of what is laughingly called 'ufology,' especially in the USA, is indeed modern folklore.
• Paul Garner, myself and other members of the Rotherham team respond to an article by 'Mr Clarke' regarding UFO sightings over Rotherham. They claim to have spent nights in the area and seen objects that do not resemble Stealth aircraft, describing them as orange and blue fluorescent balls of light. They argue that dedicated individuals observing the skies are needed, rather than 'armchair intellectuals,' and suggest Mr. Clarke should have considered explanations like weather balloons.
• Editor's comment on the Rotherham letter notes that 'Mr Clarke' is unavailable and that Allan Petres is a YUFOS member from the 'Rotherham Triangle' area. The editor dismisses the idea of Stealth aircraft being the cause of the sightings and expresses weariness with discussions about 'the truth.'
• Jean Sider, Clichy, France thanks the editor for a previous answer and discusses the importance of considering both positive and negative clues in UFO cases. He defends Dr. Guerin, suggesting he is a more honest and interesting person than the editor, and believes that if more scientists behaved like Guerin, UFO phenomena would be studied more seriously.

Another One Bites The Dust: The Welsh Crash of '74

This article by David Clarke investigates a UFO event in central Wales in January 1974, often referred to as the "Welsh Crash." Clarke aims to debunk crash/retrieval folklore, which he notes is often confined to rumors like the Rendlesham Forest saga or unverified stories of crashed UFOs in northern England.

The Welsh event is connected to a possible UFO crash and has been linked to Jenny Randles' book "UFO REALITY" and the group APEN. The report described the object as 'discoid, domed' with a tripod undercarriage, four portholes, and a size of 200ft by 50ft. A former British government official reportedly suggested such a device could be found 'under wraps' at a military base.

Clarke presents the facts, stating that a luminous object, initially thought to be a meteorite, impacted the Cader Bronwen mountain range at 8:30 pm on January 23rd, 1974, causing a large explosion heard over 60 square miles. Nine minutes later, an earth tremor of magnitude 3.5-4 was recorded 250 miles away in Edinburgh. Local residents in Llandrillo reported glasses and windows rattling, and saw 'red disc-shaped objects' and lights encircling the mountain. Mrs. Annie Williams described seeing a large, bright light with a long, fiery tail.

Scores of witnesses across Wales, Merseyside, and County Durham reported sightings of brilliant flying objects that night. Coastguards and police at Holyhead observed lights and a flaming object. Mr. and Mrs. Haughtin saw a luminous sphere. Hundreds of miles away in Sunderland, witnesses reported a long oblong object with green, yellow, and orange lights hovering low.

These events coincided with sightings of 'fireballs' and 'meteors' across various regions, and reputable astronomers recorded three fireballs. The seismic movement along the Bala faultline is noted.

Clarke references reports in The London Times (January 25, 1974) describing an explosion and a bright flash on the mountainside, leading to searches by mountain rescue teams, local police, and RAF helicopters. However, no trace of a meteorite was found, and the scale of the event suggested a rock weighing several hundred tons would have been required to cause the recorded tremor.

To investigate further, Clarke contacted a scientist from Keele University, Dr. Ron Maddison, who led the search for the crashed 'meteorite.' Dr. Maddison dismisses the 'crash/retrieval' rumors, stating that the event began with reports of a large explosion and a bright flash, suggesting a meteorite fall. After interviewing witnesses and exploring the area, they found only minor disturbances in the soil, hampered by light snowfall. A photographic survey by the RAF yielded no results. The event was fixed by the Eskdalemuir seismic station as centered a few hundred feet beneath the Bala fault.

Dr. Maddison's conclusion is that the event was a demonstration of rock movements along faults generating sufficient electric potential to cause an electric discharge in the air, possibly through the piezo-electric effect. He suggests that rock movements might release gases that provide a medium for discharge and speculates a link to 'Transient Lunar Phenomena' reported on the Moon. He does not know of a mechanism for direct light emission from changing rock stresses but suggests it might explain the phenomenon.

Clarke concludes that the Welsh crash story, if it had fallen into the hands of less discerning individuals, might have become another piece of UFO mythology. He notes that the RAF was persuaded by scientists to search the area, indicating initial official disinterest.

The article mentions that the series of events leading up to the Welsh Mountain explosion will be explored in depth in his forthcoming book with Andy Roberts, "Phantoms of the Sky," and in a special IUN/Project Pennine report.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue of UFO Brigantia exhibits a critical and skeptical stance towards sensationalized UFO claims, particularly those involving government cover-ups and unverified abduction accounts. The "Dulce Papers" section, while presenting extraordinary allegations of alien experimentation and genetic manipulation, does so by relaying information from alleged witnesses and documents, rather than endorsing them as fact. The editorial introduction explicitly states a desire to present "ufology we deserve," implying a move away from pure sensationalism.

The "Updates From The States" section, particularly the commentary on John Lear and the "GRUDGE 13 report," highlights a strong skepticism towards claims lacking concrete evidence. The magazine contrasts the claims of individuals like Lear and English with the more cautious and evidence-based approach of researchers like Dr. Jaques Vallee and the scientific analysis presented regarding the Welsh crash. The "Abduction Doubts" section directly challenges the methodologies and evidence presented by prominent abduction proponents.

The "Welsh Crash of '74" article serves as a prime example of the magazine's approach, meticulously dissecting a popular UFO event and presenting a scientific explanation that debunks the crash/retrieval narrative. The editor's comments throughout the "Letters to the Editor" section often reinforce this skeptical perspective, particularly in response to claims about John Lear and UFO sightings.

Overall, the magazine appears to favor a more grounded, investigative approach to ufology, questioning sensational claims and seeking rational explanations, while still acknowledging the existence of unexplained phenomena and the ongoing public interest in UFOs.

This issue of UFO BRIGANTIA, dated March 1989, features a cover story titled "NEW SCIENTIST, CSICOP & UFOS" by Jenny Randles. The magazine appears to be a UK-based publication focused on UFO phenomena and related topics.

Article: New Scientist, CSICOP & UFOs

Jenny Randles begins by criticizing the "Ariadne" column in New Scientist, which she describes as a weekly column that often takes an abusive and satirical look at fringe science topics, including UFOs. Randles details how BUFORA (British UFO Research Association), an organization she is associated with, has conducted extensive research into the 'mystery circles' appearing in cereal fields, concluding they are likely weather phenomena and not caused by UFOs. Despite BUFORA's efforts to share their findings, including joint research with meteorological units, Randles claims New Scientist never mentioned their work.

Randles recounts a specific instance where the 'Ariadne' column allegedly misrepresented BUFORA's stance on the mystery circles, falsely implying they supported a spaceship explanation. When BUFORA demanded a correction, they received no response.

The article then focuses on a British TV documentary praised by 'Ariadne', titled "Is there anybody there?", which Randles describes as an expose of psychics and ESP, heavily featuring CSICOP (Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal) members. The documentary's UFO segment, lasting about 15 minutes, focused on the infamous December 1980 Bentwaters Air Force Base incident in Rendlesham Forest, Suffolk. Randles criticizes the use of illustrations from the book 'Sky Crash' without permission and the documentary's presenter, psychologist Nicholas Humphrey, for allegedly misrepresenting the book's conclusions and presenting a biased account.

Randles argues that Humphrey's narrative about the Bentwaters incident, including the alleged phantom police car lights, was a 'guesswork' version taken from the TV and not based on rigorous investigation. She points out that the documentary was heavily influenced by CSICOP, with UFO consultant Ian Ridpath being instrumental in narrowing the focus to the Bentwaters case, which he had allegedly investigated and sought to disprove.

Randles details her attempts to protest the documentary to Channel 4, which she claims refused to offer air time for a 'Right to Reply', deeming UFOs a 'minority topic'. She also recounts a radio debate where the program makers admitted they did not want believers on the program, illustrating what she sees as CSICOP's biased definition of objectivity.

Following this, Randles wrote to 'Ariadne' to question their comments. She received a reply that she found arrogant and dismissive, suggesting that 'Ariadne' might be Ian Ridpath. Randles disputes 'Ariadne's' claim that she is skeptical only of UFO origins, not of UFOs themselves, and criticizes the columnist's tendency to focus on 'dottier events' and ridicule perceived absurdities in ufology without acknowledging serious research.

Randles defends the importance of UFO study, arguing that even unexplained sightings (IFOs) are significant, and that UFO data has aided various scientific fields. She criticizes 'Ariadne' for dismissing ufology as a 'trivial pursuit' and for only highlighting negative or absurd aspects, thus creating a distorted public perception.

Randles further elaborates on the 'Ariadne' response, noting the columnist's dismissiveness and refusal to engage in a real debate, which she interprets as a recognition of having no reasonable answers. She laments the tendency of scientists and science writers to avoid engaging with the UFO problem when presented with well-argued cases.

Randles concludes this section by referencing Lyall Watson's thoughts on astronauts potentially encountering new life-forms, suggesting that current linear, sight-based programs might be inadequate for entirely different sensory experiences.

Article: Castaneda's Worlds

By Ian Blake, this article explores the work of author Carlos Castaneda, known for his studies of shamanism among the Sonoran Indians and his pioneering role in the 'psychedelic movement'. Castaneda's spiritual journey began in 1960 when he met Don Juan Matus, a Yaqui Indian. Castaneda, then an anthropology student, was on field trips to gather information on medicinal plants when he encountered Don Juan.

Don Juan is described as a 'brujo' or sorcerer with alleged secret knowledge, who was generally avoided by other Sonoran Indians. Castaneda, however, was fascinated and began a magical apprenticeship under Don Juan in June 1961, using psychedelic drugs like peyote, Jimson weed, and mushrooms to open new 'centres of vision'. His subsequent initiations are detailed in books such as 'The Teachings of Don Juan', 'A Separate Reality', and 'Journey to Ixlan'.

Blake highlights Castaneda's compelling narrative style, which makes his experiences seem credible. Under Don Juan's tutelage, Castaneda learned shamanistic techniques and lore, including the process of 'seeing' or developing 'occult perception' to penetrate physical matter and reveal underlying reality. This faculty leads Castaneda to encounter 'non-ordinary reality' and various entities, including a talking coyote, a sorceress, and Mescalito (the spirit of the peyote plant).

The article acknowledges that these experiences could be dismissed as drug-induced hallucinations, referencing Jim Morrison as an example of someone who reported similar revelations. However, it suggests that Castaneda's work offers intriguing parallels with Fortean lore and UFO phenomena.

One significant episode described is when Castaneda, after a desert sojourn, encounters three Mexicans who ask for a ride. He initially refuses due to lack of space, but their entreaties make him feel uneasy. Later, Don Juan explains that these were not human beings but 'allies' – forces that a brujo can harness. These allies can assume any size or shape and are detected by 'seeing' with the inner eye. They are described as mimetic creatures that mold themselves to the cultural beliefs of the era and milieu in which they appear, with obscure motives but significant actions.

Don Juan states that allies cannot 'take the lead' or exert direct influence, but contact with them can be dangerous as they tend to bring out the worst in human nature. Their existence, Blake suggests, sheds light on mysteries like Bigfoot and the Surrey Puma, and potentially connects to UFOs.

The article posits that UFOs and their occupants might appear to share a link with human consciousness, citing John A. Keel's theory that UFOs are psychic constructs or thought forms that emanate from a parallel dimension, requiring energy from human emotion or percipients.

Blake draws parallels between Castaneda's allies and UFO phenomena, noting that both can be seen as psychic constructs or manifestations of energy. He mentions the 'Mothman' illustration as an example of such a phenomenon. The article suggests that UFOs need a source of energy, such as a fire, a living thing, or a human medium.

Article: The Ally Hypothesis

This section delves deeper into the 'Ally Hypothesis', drawing on David Tansley's work. Tansley, an authority on alternative medicine, views many UFO encounters, including the 'Scoriton Mystery', as 'ally scenarios'. He also applies this to cases involving Men in Black (MIBs), describing them as sinister agents who threaten UFO witnesses but whose threats are seldom fulfilled.

Tansley suggests that MIBs fit the theory of allies, taking the form expected of them. This provides a framework for understanding how projections or deep-seated fears of witnesses might become integrated into everyday life. The Ally Hypothesis is presented as a way to explore 'high strangeness' aspects of the UFO enigma.

The article then revisits the concept of allies being drawn to strong emotional fields, particularly 'animal fear', which releases energy that suits them. It describes an encounter where an ally might cause a heart attack or a 'wrestle' that drains the ally's energy. This is linked to cases involving Bigfoot and phantom big cats, where assaults are seemingly carried out to generate fear rather than cause serious harm.

Two cases are cited: Mike Busby's encounter with a six-foot tall, black creature in Illinois, and Mary Crane's encounter with a large cat-like animal in Indiana. In both instances, the creatures inflicted superficial wounds or engaged in non-lethal interactions before vanishing when confronted by external stimuli (headlights, a rescue party).

The article questions the purpose of these seemingly pointless attacks, suggesting they make sense as 'ally strategies' to generate emotional response. It posits that these creatures are inert without human emotion and expectations.

David Tansley's book 'Omens of Awareness' is cited, where he views UFO encounters and MIB cases as 'ally scenarios'. He notes that MIBs fit the theory of allies, taking the form expected of them, and suggests that MIBs might be creatures of fantasy or projections of the witness's fears.

The Ally Hypothesis is presented as a potential explanation for many 'high strangeness' aspects of the UFO enigma.

Article: UFO Brigantia, March '89 - <<28>>

This section continues the discussion on the parallels between Castaneda's allies and UFO phenomena. The article draws a comparison to Fortean lore, mentioning cases like the Mattoon Gasser and the Kelly-Hopkinsville siege, where assaults seem designed to generate fear and paranoia rather than serious harm. The Kelly-Hopkinsville goblins, despite having lethal claws, only stroked a victim's head, echoing Don Juan's statement that allies cannot truly harm humans.

The article reiterates that the same forces and patterns appear to be at work in both Castaneda's experiences and UFO phenomena. The motives of these forces are inscrutable, but Don Juan warns that allies are capable of bringing out the worst in people, which is linked to personality disorders affecting UFO contactees. The fear that dogs exhibit towards allies is also noted as a common feature in UFO sightings.

John Lear's book 'Operation Trojan Horse' is mentioned, where he speculates that these forces have always existed. The article concludes that UFO and ally-related phenomena likely share a common source, existing all around us and sometimes being called into being by psychic forces or human emotion. The purpose of these forces remains open to conjecture, but Castaneda's books are suggested as a resource for further research, with a caveat about the author's use of mind-expanding drugs.

STOP PRESS!

A 'Stop Press' section details an accusation made on January 12, 1989, by Lear and W. Cooper against President Bush and the government. They alleged that the government was aware of alien/human bases, mutilations, and the murder and brainwashing of 'patriots' who attempted to expose this situation. They demanded that the government cease all dealings with this 'alien nation' and that the 'Alien Nation' leave the United States by June 1, 1989. The reason given for this action was 'saving humanity' and 'preserving the government'. The article notes that no reply had been received by the time of printing.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the critical examination of media coverage of UFOs and fringe science, particularly the perceived bias of mainstream publications like New Scientist and television documentaries. There is a strong emphasis on debunking sensationalism and promoting rigorous investigation, as exemplified by BUFORA's work. The issue also explores alternative explanations for UFO phenomena, such as the 'Ally Hypothesis' derived from Carlos Castaneda's work, suggesting a connection between psychic phenomena, human consciousness, and anomalous aerial events. The editorial stance appears to be one of skepticism towards official narratives and sensationalized media portrayals, advocating for a more balanced and scientifically grounded approach to understanding UFOs and related mysteries, while also acknowledging the limitations of current scientific paradigms in explaining certain phenomena.