SVL Tijdschrift - Jaargang 4 No 16 - oktober 1985

Magazine Overview

Title: SVLT
Issue: Volume 4, Number 16
Date: October 1985
Publisher: Studiegroep voor Vreemde Luchtverschijnselen (SVL)
Language: Dutch
Country: Belgium

This issue of SVLT, a quarterly journal dedicated to the study of UFO phenomena, highlights the burgeoning field of 3D techniques in UFO research. The cover prominently features a detailed "SKY MAP" generated for a specific sighting that occurred on June 5, 1983, in Moorslede, West-Vlaanderen, Belgium. This map, created using computerized star charts, illustrates the celestial bodies present at the time of the observation, demonstrating a key analytical tool employed by the study group.

Editorial and Content Highlights

Editorial ('Woord Vooraf')

Wim Van Utrecht, the editor and publisher, opens the issue with an editorial that touches upon the journal's use of computerized star charts for analyzing UFO reports. He explains that the sky map on the cover is an example of this technique, specifically for a case in Moorslede. The editorial notes that the second part of a series on Belgian 'trace cases' has been postponed to the January 1986 issue due to delays in text and illustrations. Instead, this issue features an article by SVL correspondent Patrick Vantuyne from West-Vlaanderen, who proposes original ideas for achieving concrete results in UFO research. Van Utrecht also mentions a reader's letter from Hans Van Kampen, known for his books, which offers insight into his current stance on UFO investigation. The editorial concludes with an apology for the delays and thanks readers for their patience, wishing them happy holidays and a prosperous 1986.

Article: '3D-TECHNIEKEN EN UFO-ONDERZOEK' (3D Techniques and UFO Research)

Authored by Patrick Vantuyne, this article explores the potential of 3D techniques, particularly stereophotography, as a new and promising avenue for UFO research. Vantuyne recounts his early encounter with the UFO phenomenon in the 1960s, which sparked his interest in science, astronomy, and eventually, parapsychology. His interest in science led him to the unique medium of 3D photography.

#### Understanding Stereophotography

The article defines stereophotography as a method that optimally reconstructs reality as seen by both eyes, emphasizing depth perception. It explains the basic principle: using two cameras (or viewing two images) simultaneously, akin to how human eyes perceive depth. The author details how this creates a 3D effect (relief) by capturing slight horizontal differences between the two viewpoints, which the brain interprets as depth. The article includes diagrams (Figures 1, 2, and 3) illustrating direct 3D viewing, indirect 3D viewing via camera viewfinders, and stereoscopic reconstruction from slides.

#### Historical Context and Applications

Vantuyne delves into the history of stereoscopy, crediting Sir Charles Wheatstone (England) with describing his mirror stereoscope principle in 1838. He notes that stereophotography emerged alongside conventional photography, though it saw a decline in popularity among the general public due to its perceived complexity compared to readily available visual media like television and cinema. However, the article argues that in scientific research, where complexity is less of a barrier, there is a growing interest in 3D techniques for studying phenomena that might be invisible or inaccessible to the naked eye.

Examples of scientific applications mentioned include CERN's use of 3D photography in 1981 to study particle interactions in accelerators. The article also touches upon the 'View Master' toy as a simple stereoscope, noting its limitations in image quality and size. It points out that while 3D educational materials are available, especially in the USA, the best way to experience high-quality 3D is through stereoscopic societies. The author offers to send a free booklet on 3D with useful addresses to interested readers.

#### 3D in UFO Research: Direct and Indirect Use

The article categorizes the application of 3D techniques in UFO research into two main groups: indirect and direct use.

• Indirect Use: This involves analyzing existing photographic material from a single UFO case that may consist of multiple images. The goal is to identify opportunities for creating 'accidental' 3D montages to conduct stereometric analysis.
• Direct Use: This pertains to field research for capturing topographical data in 3D or documenting traces directly related to a UFO sighting. Ideally, 3D techniques could be employed during direct encounters with UFOs, especially when the object is observable at a reasonable distance and recognized as an unknown entity ('Close Encounter' as per Hynek).

The author emphasizes the need for high-quality 3D material to serve as convincing evidence and stimulate unbiased UFO research. He outlines three main categories of 3D recording techniques based on their evidentiary value:

1. Recordings made with a true stereocamera: This is considered the most suitable method, offering optimal application of the technique. Acquiring such equipment can be done through 3D clubs or, with greater risk, at photo antique fairs. Vintage REALIST stereocameras from the 1950s are highlighted as practical for field research, allowing for 3D capture of observation sites and potential traces. This method allows for precise measurement of changes in vegetation or ground structure over time, aiding in the analysis of events.
2. Recordings made with coupled cameras operated simultaneously via a remote trigger (electronic or mechanical): This involves using two identical cameras mounted side-by-side or in a 'Simiase twin' configuration. While requiring two cameras, it offers a way to achieve stereoscopic recording. The advantage is that one doesn't necessarily need to own two cameras, as a second can often be borrowed. This setup is effective for capturing relatively static or slow-moving objects. However, synchronization is critical; even a slight difference in timing can distort the spatial relationship of the object to its background. The article notes that the lenses are typically spaced about 6.5 cm apart, similar to human eye spacing, which can enhance the stereo effect for measurements.
3. Recordings made with two non-coupled cameras, using two identical lens systems, triggered simultaneously by arrangement (signal): This method is more challenging to synchronize and is best suited for quasi-static objects. Its main advantage is the ability for the photographers to stand further apart, enabling the creation of 'maquette effect' 3D images of distant geographical features (like mountains) and any objects moving within the landscape. This allows for a better understanding of the landscape's spatial structure, which is difficult to gauge with normal viewing due to the limited distance between the eyes relative to the landscape. Shadows can also contribute to a subjective impression of depth.

The article concludes by addressing the 'Achilles' heel' of UFO photography: proving that a case is not a hoax or a model. The Saas-Fee photograph is mentioned as a notable example, but the author laments the ongoing uncertainty and the difficulty in making a significant impact on serious researchers and scientists.

Other Content

'Knipsels Gazet van Antwerpen' (Clippings from Gazet van Antwerpen)

This section likely contains newspaper clippings related to UFO sightings or related topics, as indicated by the title.

'Bespreking Catalogus Astronautmeldingen' (Review of Astronaut Reports Catalog)

This suggests a review of a catalog detailing reports from astronauts, possibly concerning their observations of unusual aerial phenomena.

'Men Schrijft Ons' (Letters to the Editor)

This section features a letter from Hans Van Kampen, whose books are well-known. His letter provides his perspective on UFO research.

'Recente Meldingen' (Recent Reports)

This section presumably lists recent UFO sightings and reports received by the SVL.

Subscription and Copyright Information

Subscription: The issue details subscription costs (360,-BF for 4 issues or 1 year, with a 'support subscription' from 400,-BF) and provides bank transfer details (PCR account 000-1194979-36) and contact information for Wim Van Utrecht in Antwerp.

Copyright: The copyright notice states that no part of the publication may be reproduced or distributed without written permission from the publisher. It clarifies that the content of SVLT is determined by the editor, but the opinions of contributors do not necessarily reflect the stance of the publisher or the study group. An English translation of this notice is also provided.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the scientific investigation of UFO phenomena, with a strong emphasis on the application of technology. The article on 3D photography and stereoscopy highlights a commitment to employing advanced methods for evidence analysis. The editorial stance appears to be one of rigorous, data-driven research, acknowledging the challenges and complexities involved in UFO investigation while seeking to advance the field through systematic study and the exploration of new techniques. The journal aims to be a platform for sharing research findings, reader experiences, and expert opinions within the UFO community, particularly in Belgium.

This issue of 'UIT Gazet van Antwerpen' from Friday, August 9, 1985, focuses on the declining phenomenon of UFO sightings and explores logical explanations for them. The main cover headline boldly states: 'Logical explanations put an end to ufology: Flying saucers have disappeared.' The issue includes articles, letters, and a review of a UFO catalog, all contributing to a skeptical yet analytical approach to the subject.

Articles and Content

'Logische verklaringen doen ufologie de das om Vliegende schotels zijn verdwenen' (Logical explanations put an end to ufology: Flying saucers have disappeared)

This lead article by the newspaper's editor notes the current lull in UFO reports, contrasting it with past periods of high activity. It suggests that the decline is due to a wave of critical books and publications that have debunked many previous sightings as natural phenomena or misidentifications. The article quotes Marc Broux, chairman of the Belgian UFO association UFO 21, who confirms that many reports can be attributed to common occurrences like aircraft lights, weather balloons, or even unusual cloud formations. Broux emphasizes that while his organization takes all reports seriously, most have rational explanations.

The article also touches upon the historical context of UFO sightings, referencing Kenneth Arnold's 1947 report that coined the term 'flying saucer.' It highlights how the initial global excitement led to the formation of numerous UFO organizations. However, the current trend is towards demystification, with many UFO groups in Belgium and elsewhere ceasing to exist due to a lack of work or interest.

'UFO'S' (Letter to the Editor)

Wim Van Utrecht, from the 'Studiegroep voor Vreemde Luchtverschijnselen' (SVL), writes in response to the main article. He commends the newspaper for its more objective treatment of the UFO topic compared to other media. Van Utrecht clarifies that SVL's goal is to critically examine UFO reports with the assumption that conventional explanations exist. He states that their research into 1909 Belgian UFO reports has identified about fifty potentially interesting cases, but emphasizes that 'interesting' does not equate to 'unexplained' or 'extraterrestrial.' SVL aims to collect and publish information reliably, awaiting further scientific interest in these phenomena.

'MEN SCHRIJFT ONS...' (Letters to the Editor)

This section features correspondence from readers.

Letter from Gordon Creighton:
Creighton expresses his interest in an article by Jan Heering published in SVLT magazine. He is honored to find his name mentioned alongside those of John Keel and Jacques Vallée, whom he admires.

Letter from Claude Maugé:
Maugé responds to Wim van Utrecht, thanking him for sending SVLT. He offers additional information and examples concerning the reliability of Jacques Vallée's catalog, 'Un siècle d'atterrissages UFO (1868-1968).' Maugé meticulously analyzes several cases cited by Jan Heering, including those from La Roche en Brénil (1954) and Mendoza (1968). He points out that some cases, like La Roche en Brénil, are considered questionable due to suspected hoaxes. Maugé also critically examines cases listed in a 1964 FSR study on humanoids, which included a list of 80 observations. He highlights that a letter in a subsequent FSR issue, written by J. Vallée himself, identified several of these cases (1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14) as likely hoaxes or misinterpretations. Maugé expresses surprise and disappointment that Vallée later re-included many of these questionable cases in his catalog without reservation, suggesting that Vallée's qualities as a compiler are undermined. He concludes that extreme caution is needed regarding the reliability of Vallée's catalog, especially when it cites other sources like G. Quincy's catalog.

Letter from Claude Maugé (continued):
Maugé further elaborates on his critique of Vallée's work. He notes that Vallée's own letter in FSR identified cases 1, 6, 7, 13, and 14 as questionable or misinterpretations. However, Vallée's subsequent publications, including 'The pattern behind the UFO landings' and 'Un siècle d'atterrissages UFO,' re-included many of these cases without reservation. Maugé finds it difficult to accept Vallée's actions, especially given the number of cases involved and the short time frame between the identification of errors and their reappearance in new publications. He suggests two possibilities: either Vallée deliberately used cases he knew to be false, or he forgot the information he had received. Maugé leans towards the former, questioning Vallée's integrity as a compiler. He also expresses concern about the reliability of sources cited by Vallée, such as G. Quincy's catalog.

'MEN SCHRIJFT ONS...' (Letter from Claude Maugé, continued)

Maugé continues his critique, noting that he has reviewed FSR journals up to November-December 1966 and found no corrections for the cases mentioned. He reiterates his disbelief that Vallée could have forgotten such a significant amount of information. Maugé concludes that while he believes Vallée acted in good faith, his compilation skills are now seriously undermined. He warns readers to be wary of his catalog, regardless of any 'warnings' Vallée might include. He also expresses apprehension about the reliability of cases cited in G. Quincy's catalog, which Vallée occasionally references.

'MEN SCHRIJFT ONS...' (Letter from Claude Maugé, P.S.)

Maugé adds a postscript, enclosing a copy of the letter from FSR Vol.10, No.3. He also asks Jan Heering if he has the list of South American cases that A. March supposedly resolved, and if so, to provide March's address.

'MEN SCHRIJFT ONS...' (Letter from an unnamed contributor)

This letter, addressed to 'Beste Wim,' discusses the author's detachment from the UFO scene since 1981, though he has continued to collect material and conduct short investigations. He notes an increase in the intensity and 'quality' of recent UFO reports and a growing public interest, suggesting a new wave of 'UFO believers' who may not be aware of recent research findings. He compares this to a similar surge in interest around 1976. The author observes that the trends in UFO reports remain consistent, dominated by nocturnal lights and daylight reflections, phenomena that have surprised observers since the 1960s and 1970s without changing in form. He mentions a few significant events in the Netherlands over the past five years that warrant further investigation, for which he plans to contact Dutch authorities. He expresses frustration with the inability of UFO researchers to eliminate the vast majority of reports that are likely misidentifications of lights and reflections, calling it 'noise' that obscures the true UFO signal. He believes the truly unique and unusual phenomena are what should be the focus, rather than common occurrences.

The author further reflects on the categorization of UFO reports, suggesting that current norms need re-evaluation. He states that his research has focused on natural but remarkable phenomena that could be sources for UFO reports, and he understands the mechanisms behind UFO sightings, which helps explain the 'noise.' He believes that only about 1% of reports are truly unique and authentic, and this is where research efforts should concentrate. He expresses concern about the potential influence of the 'parapsychology circuit,' which he views as prone to deception and bias. He concludes that close-range sightings are most interesting but are influenced by the observer's frame of reference and stress levels. He emphasizes the importance of background research on witnesses, noting that individuals with UFO-aware acquaintances or those seeking attention might misinterpret ordinary events as UFOs, thus wasting research time.

'CHRONOLOGISCHE CATALOGUS VAN UFO-WAARNEMINGEN GERAAPPORTEERD IN HET KADER VAN DE RUIMTEVLUGTEN' (Review)

This section reviews a French brochure by Marc Hallet titled 'Catalogue chronologique des observations d'OVNI faites dans le cadre d'experiences spatiales.' The brochure summarizes 42 known and lesser-known UFO sightings related to space flights, with accompanying illustrations. The review praises the brochure as a useful reference that corrects inaccurate reporting on such sightings. It notes that Hallet is an experienced author, having previously written critical works on the Adamski affair and the BUFOI movement. Hallet also authored 'Ufologie: domaine organisé de l'absurde,' a syllabus exploring ufological controversies. He is currently working on books about Marian apparitions and 'Men in Black.' The review highlights Hallet's critique of mainstream ufologists and his well-documented approach, contrasting it with those who link ufology to parapsychology or Marian apparitions. Hallet's extensive library covers popular beliefs and scientific errors. The review quotes Hallet's view that while ufology's precursor is unknown, its errors are already apparent, causing prolonged confusion. The brochure, with a limited print run of 40 copies, is available directly from the author.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the decline of UFO sightings and the increasing prevalence of rational explanations. There is a strong emphasis on critical analysis, debunking hoaxes, and questioning the methodology of UFO research, particularly concerning the reliability of catalogs and the influence of parapsychology. The editorial stance appears to be one of skepticism towards unexplained phenomena, favoring scientific rigor and demystification. The magazine actively encourages readers to submit their own experiences for investigation, but with an underlying expectation of finding conventional explanations.

This issue of the SVL Journal, identified as number 4116 and dated September 1985, is published by SVL, likely based in Belgium. The cover headline poses the question, "Man signals a UFO - Is he really seeing them fly?", suggesting a focus on witness accounts and the interpretation of sightings. The magazine is primarily in Dutch, with some English summaries and contributions.

Recent Sightings and Investigations

The issue begins with a continuation of "RECENTE MELDINGEN" (Recent Sightings), detailing a report from Klein Brabant, Belgium, where multiple witnesses observed a plane flying backward and forward over the Schelde river. The SVL evaluation identifies this as a "VLIEGTUIG" (aircraft) and attributes the phenomenon to an optical effect created by the sun's position and the 'canard' aircraft's unusual shape, specifically identifying the pilot as Pierre SCHOEMANS. The explanation is deemed definitive.

Another report from Merksem, Belgium, describes witnesses seeing "Onbekende basketters in de ruimte..." (Unknown basketball players in space...). They observed shiny white balls forming shapes like stars and constellations during daylight. The SVL evaluation, however, attributes this to "VALSCHERMSPRINGERS" (parachutists), explaining that a paradrop exercise was underway, and the sun's reflection on the parachutes created the illusion of white balls, with the formations being attempts by parachutists to create shapes.

Two Dutch sightings are then presented: one from Amersfoort, where a man named Groenewoud reported seeing a rocket-shaped object with blue and yellow lights. The SVL evaluation classifies this as a "METEOOR" (meteor). The second, from Hilversum, describes a cigar-shaped object seen by a Mr. Van 't Erve. The SVL evaluation again classifies this as a "METEOOR", noting that the descriptions in both cases point to a bright meteor or bolide, and the distance between Amersfoort and Hilversum makes a shared phenomenon likely.

Trace Cases in Belgium - Part 1

A significant portion of the magazine is dedicated to "TRACE CASES IN BELGIUM - PART 1", an article by Wim VAN UTRECHT. This section provides a survey and synthesis of Belgian CE II (Close Encounter of the Second Kind) reports, focusing on cases involving physical effects like ground traces and the discovery of substances. The author emphasizes the importance of trace cases for forming theories about the origin of the UFO phenomenon, suggesting they provide material evidence beyond witness imagination.

The article critically examines the reliability of these trace cases, noting that an analysis of Belgian cases was "quite disappointing" and similar to studies in other countries. The SVL journal publishes trimonthly summaries in English to reach a wider audience.

The chronological survey begins with several historical cases:

• 1811, Antwerpen (Antwerp), Belgium: A fireball explosion was reported, followed by a jelly-like substance falling to the ground. The SVL evaluation is "INSUFFICIENT (-METEOR)", suggesting a natural anomaly.
• 1819.11.02, Blankenberge, West-Flanders, Belgium: A report of "red rain" was analyzed by chemists who found muriate of cobalt. The SVL evaluation is "NATURAL ANOMALY".
• 1909, Adinkerke, West-Flanders, Belgium: A photograph of a trace was mentioned, but no further details or references were available, leading to an "INSUFFICIENT" evaluation.
• 1946 or 1947.08 or 09, Vrouweneekhoek, East Flanders, Belgium: A young man reported seeing a small, armored being and a disc-like object, with another being breaking an acacia bough. The SVL evaluation is "INSUFFICIENT".
• 1947.03, Wulvergem, West-Flanders, Belgium: A game-keeper claimed to have fired at a fire-ball that exploded, leaving a burned grass circle. This was later revealed to be a hoax, resulting in a "MYSTIFICATION" evaluation.
• 1947, Jalhay, Liége, Belgium: A large, precise circular area of carbonized grass, about 50 feet in diameter, was witnessed. The SVL evaluation is "INSUFFICIENT", noting that while the witness's reliability is considered high, the case lacks sufficient elements to be truly mysterious.
• 1951.10 or 11, Terrest, West-Flanders, Belgium: A highly detailed account of a flying saucer landing, with seven red-skinned beings emerging. The craft emitted intense heat and beams of light. Four scorched impressions were found on the ground. The SVL evaluation is "INSUFFICIENT (-INTERESTING)", cautioning that the report, though spectacular, has not been in-depth investigated and relies on a witness recalling events from 26 years prior.

Letters to the Editor

Hilary EVANS from London writes a letter dated January 17, 1986, discussing the fundamental problems of establishing a data base in ufology. She references a study by the French group 'Gabriel' which estimated the low visibility and reporting rates of UFOs, leading to a figure of 1 in 38,400 for published reports. Evans highlights the effect of media hype, such as in 1954 France, and notes the growing sophistication of the public and investigators. She questions the correlation between Virgin sightings and UFOs, suggesting possible cultural or external influences like geophysical or meteorological factors. Evans stresses that the number of reports is not an indication of observations and that patterns must be sought while acknowledging that "nothing is necessarily what it seems to be."

Jan HEERING from Amsterdam, writing on January 09, 1986, comments on letters from Gordon Creighton and Claude Maugé. He finds Creighton's letter disappointing and Maugé's letter interesting, suggesting that both represent "the top of the iceberg."

A quote from MARC HALLET is included, comparing the history of science where alchemy preceded chemistry and astrology engendered astronomy, to ufology, stating that its future is unknown but many of its errors are already known, leading to useless fumbling.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the investigation of UFO sightings and physical trace cases, with a strong emphasis on critical analysis and scientific rigor. The SVL adopts a cautious approach, evaluating cases based on available evidence and often concluding that many reported phenomena can be explained by natural anomalies (meteors, atmospheric effects) or hoaxes. There is a clear effort to distinguish between sensational reports and those that can withstand scrutiny. The journal highlights the challenges in ufological research, including data reliability, witness testimony interpretation, and the need for systematic investigation. The editorial stance appears to be one of seeking empirical evidence and rational explanations, while acknowledging the persistent mystery surrounding some reported events.