STRANGE DAZE

Magazine Overview

Title: STRANGE DAZE
Issue: WINTER 1999
Date: 1999-12-01
Publisher: Strange Daze Magazine
Country: UK
Language: English

This issue of Strange Daze Newsletter marks a significant turning point with the editor, Dave Newton, announcing his final editorial. He expresses a deep disillusionment with the field of UFOlogy, feeling that after five years, it has not progressed and remains a 'fringe subject' without a clear direction. Newton advocates for a more scientific approach, urging the breakdown of UFOlogy into its distinct component fields, each to be studied by relevant experts. He is particularly critical of the 'alien abduction' phenomenon, labeling it a dangerous and false myth that negatively impacts people's lives, comparing it to the satanic ritual abuse hysteria.

Editorial: A Farewell to UFOlogy?

Dave Newton reflects on his five years with Strange Daze, during which he has investigated numerous UFO cases, spoken to witnesses, examined photographs, and reviewed countless reports and books. He concludes that "UFOlogy" is an inadequate umbrella term for diverse phenomena. He distinguishes between different categories, such as 'earthlights' (geophysical phenomena) and reports likely generated by secret aircraft. Newton dismisses the extraterrestrial hypothesis for UFOs, stating he has seen no convincing evidence of alien ships visiting Earth. He proposes that many UFO phenomena might be explained by medical conditions like electrical hypersensitivity caused by environmental electromagnetic pollution. Newton believes that the true experts needed to solve the "UFO mystery" are not single investigators but specialists in various fields like geophysics, physics, psychology, and aerospace analysis. He criticizes the lack of a central paradigm in UFOlogy and the prevalence of personality issues within the community, likening it to a "psychologists paradise." He announces his intention to step down as editor, handing over the reins to Gloria Dixon, and suggests that paranormal research, including abduction research, offers more interesting and fruitful avenues for study than traditional UFOlogy.

News Section: UFO Sightings and Incidents

The "NEWS" section, compiled from Joseph Trainor's UFO Roundup website, details several recent UFO sightings and incidents across the UK:

• Grimsby, Lincolnshire: A "vast gleaming disc" was observed on two occasions in late July 1998, described as emitting red and green glows and moving erratically.
• Skelmersdale, Lancashire: An incident on July 26, 1998, involved reports of a microlight aircraft plunging from the sky in flames, but extensive searches found no wreckage, leading to a comparison with "Mulder and Scully."
• Frome, Somerset: On August 18, 1998, a large, black, boomerang-shaped UFO was seen traveling at high speed towards Trowbridge.
• Earby, Lancashire: A strange orange "plasma-like" UFO was sighted twice in August 1998, described as having an undulating or skipping motion and performing sharp turns.
• Rothwell, Leeds: On August 22, 1998, a crop circle formation was discovered in a field.
• Telford: On September 1, 1998, a "squashed pyramid" shaped UFO with red and green lights and a white strobe was observed.
• Weymouth, Dorset: On August 30, 1998, four witnesses reported seeing three faint, glowing lights in a rotating triangular shape moving across the sky.
• Bournemouth, Dorset: On September 13, 1998, three glowing objects were observed flying in a delta V formation at high altitude.
• Sunderland: On September 18, 1998, a large white light, possibly a UFO, was reportedly chased by multiple black helicopters.

Alleged Alien Radio Signal Controversy

On October 22, 1998, Paul Dore, a Siemens engineer, reported picking up a strange signal from the EQ Pegasi star system using SETI equipment. This claim generated significant debate online. However, the SETI League, along with other radio astronomers, dismissed the signal as a hoax, citing violations of SETI protocols and a lack of required bandwidth. Professor Nathan Cohen of Boston University also deemed it a poor hoax.

Ex-Defense Chief Claims RAF Feltwell is Britain's Area 51

Lord Hill-Norton, former chief of the UK defence staff, claimed in an interview that RAF Feltwell in Suffolk is where NATO forces track unidentified saucers. He stated that the 5th Space Surveillance Squadron, U.S. Air Force, is tracking UFOs that may threaten Earth, but the Ministry of Defence refused to provide details, citing secrecy.

Abduction Watch: Alien Implants

The latter part of the issue is dedicated to "Abduction Watch," focusing on claims of "alien implants." This section critically examines an article by Dr. Roger K. Leir, published in MUFON UFO Journal and UK UFO Magazine, which reported on the analysis of objects surgically removed from alleged abductees. The analysis, purportedly conducted by Los Alamos National Labs and New Mexico Tech, is scrutinized by ASKE members Barry Jones and Trevor Jordan. They argue that Leir's claims are unconvincing, that the materials found are likely natural, and that the scientific writing is poor and hyperbolic. The analysis of the objects is described as rough and irregular, not indicative of advanced technology. The section highlights skepticism towards the "implant" myth as the last refuge of abductionists and questions the motivations behind such claims.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the critical examination of UFOlogy, the skepticism towards the extraterrestrial hypothesis, and the questioning of the validity of alien abduction claims. The editorial stance, particularly from Dave Newton, is one of disillusionment with the current state of UFOlogy, advocating for a more rigorous, scientific approach and a separation of phenomena. There is a clear emphasis on critical thinking and skepticism, especially in the analysis of 'alien implants' and the handling of alleged anomalous signals. The issue also highlights the diverse nature of reported sightings, ranging from conventional aerial phenomena to more unusual and unexplained events, while consistently questioning the interpretations offered by some within the UFO community.

Title: Strange Daze
Issue: 14
Date: November 11, 1998
Type: Magazine

This issue of Strange Daze presents a highly skeptical analysis of alleged alien implants, primarily focusing on the work of researcher Roger Leir. The magazine questions the scientific validity of Leir's claims, offering alternative explanations for the materials and phenomena he describes. The publication also includes subscription information and previews of upcoming content.

Analysis of Alleged Alien Implants

The central theme of this issue is a critical examination of purported alien implants. The author expresses skepticism from the outset, questioning the expectation that a biological tissue sample would be easily cut or that shock has a place in scientific investigation. The magazine dismisses the idea of a "complex cladding" of eleven elements as unremarkable, noting that many natural and artificial materials contain a similar or greater number of elements.

Material Composition and Fluorescence

When discussing the material of the implants, the text notes that it was eventually identified as a protein coagulum, haemosiderin granules, and keratin – all natural substances found in the body. The author questions the build-up and mystery surrounding this material, suggesting it was mere hype. The claim that six specimens fluoresced under ultraviolet radiation is also addressed. While metal does not fluoresce, the author points out that many kinds of biological matter, including fungal growths, can exhibit UV fluorescence, suggesting a possible explanation for the observed phenomenon on the skin of alleged abductees.

Pseudo-Scientific Claims and Metallurgical Analysis

The magazine strongly criticizes Leir's comparisons of objects to antique crystal radio sets and his rambling about "structures" performing "complex functions" using "technology such as the superatom and neutrinos." This is labeled as "pseudo-scientific hogwash," with no evidence provided for internal circuitry or structure. The analysis suggests the samples are mostly pieces of iron with a protein-based coating, not miraculous or mysterious objects.

The metallurgical analysis is similarly scrutinized. While elemental analysis is presented as evidence of scientific investigation, the author argues it is vacuous. Long lists of elements are given without relative amounts or significance, seen as an attempt to "blind the reader with pseudo-science." The varying compositions found at different points are seen as indicative of irregular, natural material rather than a precision-made item. The author also questions the surmise that samples might be from a meteorite, noting that statistically varying compositions are expected from small, irregular fragments of anything.

Leir's summary of "scientific" findings, including "two major statements" about elemental composition and an iron core with iron and phosphorus cladding, is described as hyped evidence of the "Second Coming," but without any attempt to explain the significance of these "extremely mundane findings."

"Magnetoconductive" and Iron Cores

Further metallurgical analysis revealed a carbon core that was "soft and 'magnetoconductive'," a term the author questions, suggesting it's a new invention for scaremongering. The object also had an "iron core" described as "harder than the finest carbide steel." The author points out the contradiction and lack of clarity regarding whether the core was iron or carbon steel, and notes that an iron core being magnetic is not a revelation.

Response from Scientific Bodies

Leir's claim of immediately contacting NIDS for clarification, and their several-week response time, is interpreted as indicative of the lack of seriousness with which they viewed his "antics." The author perceives Leir's criticisms of "the politics of scientific testing" as an attempt to distance responsible scientists and laboratories from a "crackpot subject and its promoters."

Conclusion and Proposed Solutions

The conclusion drawn by Leir and his colleagues is that these objects "obviously have a purpose," though this purpose remains undetermined. Leir's own theories include a tracking device, transponder, behavior-controlling device, or a device for monitoring pollution levels or genetic changes. The author finds these theories speculative.

The magazine proposes that the only way to satisfactorily answer questions about these objects is for Leir and his supporters to submit an object for independent, peer-reviewed analysis, with the results made public. ASKE offers assistance in facilitating this, though doubts Leir will accept.

Alien Implant - Histopathological Commentary

This section, contributed by Jamie Revell (BSc, FIBMS), provides a histopathological perspective on features highlighted by Roger Leir in a MUFON journal article. The commentary consults with a professional histopathologist.

Analysis of Leir's Claims:

1. Inflammatory Reaction: Leir noted a lack of inflammatory reaction, which the consultant states is not unusual.
2. Solar Elastosis: Well-circumscribed lesions of solar elastosis were observed. While unusual for lesions to be defined this way, it is not unknown. The locations observed were also unusual but not unheard of.
3. Cause of Solar Elastosis: Leir implied solar elastosis normally occurs with excessive UV exposure. The consultant notes this is unusual but not unheard of, and such lesions can occur spontaneously or be caused by other forms of radiation, not just UV.
4. Membrane Composition: The objects were surrounded by a membrane described as protein coagulum, keratin, and haemosiderin. The consultant offers two explanations for the whitish objects and keratin:
* Calcified sebaceous cysts, which can be hard, visible in X-rays, and surrounded by keratin.
* Keratin from the skin surface pushed into subcutaneous tissue by the foreign body during injury.
5. Proprioceptor Nerve Endings: Leir reported proprioceptor nerve endings near the lesions. The consultant found this insufficient for an opinion but speculated it referred to Pacinian corpuscles. Further research by Jamie Revell identified Pacinian corpuscles as widely distributed in subcutaneous tissue, including the periosteum (tissue surrounding bones). Other proprioceptors, like Golgi tendon organs and Ruffini corpuscles, are found in tendons and connective tissues, respectively. Neuromuscular spindles are found in muscles. The author notes Leir's omission of defining "proprioceptive" and questions how such endings could be used to gather information.

Qualifications

Jamie Revell's qualifications include a Fellowship of the Institute of Biomedical Science (specializing in histopathological technique) and being a State-registered Biomedical Scientist (specializing in histopathology). The consultant is an MD, a practicing consultant histopathologist, and a Fellow of the Royal College of Pathologists.

Conclusion of the Issue

Kevin McClure, writing for ASKE, concludes by reiterating the need for scientific study and proof for theories regarding alien implants. He offers to help arrange independent testing of implants, provided results are published. He questions why Sims and Leir might be reluctant to reveal what Los Alamos National Labs and New Mexico Tech said about these objects, suggesting it might be to protect a myth funded by the Bigelow Foundation. McClure emphasizes that helping people whose lives are blighted by the belief in alien implants is worthwhile.

Subscription Information

Details are provided for subscriptions to Strange Daze. In the UK, 12 issues cost £10. For other regions, different numbers of issues are offered for £5 (cash, UK cheque, or International Money Order). Issues are sent by economy air mail where available. Back issues are also available. Payments should be made out to Kevin McClure and sent to an address in Leeds, England.

Upcoming Content

Future issues of Strange Daze are announced to include Kevin McClure responding to Albert Budden's challenge to Magonia, and Bill Rose on UFOlogy. The next issue is expected in the first half of the year.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring theme in this issue is scientific skepticism applied to claims of extraterrestrial technology and implants. The editorial stance is critical of unsubstantiated claims, advocating for rigorous, independent, and transparent scientific investigation. The magazine aims to debunk sensationalism and provide rational explanations for phenomena often attributed to the paranormal or extraterrestrial. There is a clear emphasis on evidence-based reasoning and a distrust of "pseudo-science" and "scaremongering."