Stendek - Vol 08 No 29 - September 1977

Magazine Overview

STENDEK, Servicio Informativo C.E.I., Issue No. 29, Volume VIII, September 1977. This issue, published by the Centro de Estudios Interplanetarios (CEI) founded in 1958, is a quarterly informative publication based in Barcelona, Spain. The cover prominently features an illustration related to the 'El OVNI de Putre' case, with the title 'STENDEK' and the subtitle 'el ovni de putre'. The magazine is directed by Pere Redón.

Editorial

The editorial, titled 'HACE DIEZ AÑOS. . .', reflects on the ten-year anniversary of the CEI's materialization into a more concrete and dynamic entity. The author, Casas Huguet, President of the CEI, emphasizes the growth, experiences, and challenges the organization has faced, leading to a stage of maturity and balance. He expresses optimism for the future, highlighting the CEI's role in fostering study, research, and collective achievements. The editorial calls for continued collaboration, interest, and enthusiasm from its members to sustain the organization's existence and purpose, describing the CEI as a tangible and living entity.

Articles and Features

El OVNI de Putre, por Ramón Simó Costa del CEI (Pages 2-6): This article details a remarkable incident that occurred on April 25, 1977, involving a Chilean military patrol near Putre, in the Arica province. The patrol, consisting of a corporal and seven soldiers, was on duty in the Pampa Lluscu-ma area when, around 4:00 AM, two luminous objects descended from the sky. One of the objects, described as a large, violet, fulgurant light with intense red points, approached the patrol. The corporal, Armando Valdés, ordered the fire to be covered and then advanced towards the light, disappearing for approximately fifteen minutes. Upon his return, he was disoriented and later reported a beard growth equivalent to five days, despite having shaved that morning. His digital watch had also stopped at 4:30 AM, showing the date as the 30th, five days ahead of the actual date. The incident was investigated, and despite initial attempts at censorship by the governor of Arica, the story gained widespread attention.

El caso de la joven perseguida, por José L. Guillerna, del C.E.I. (Pages 6-9): This report recounts the experience of Isabel Pujana, a 16-year-old girl from Yurrebaso, Spain. On the night of July 12, 1976, while walking home, she observed a flying object producing a changing red and yellow light, approaching her at high speed. The object, described as "like two Duralex plates joined by the concave part," approximately 12 meters in diameter, pursued her for about five minutes. It was described as transparent with a blue core and four legs, and it moved absolutely silently. The incident caused Isabel significant psychological distress, leading to nightmares and a regression in her studies, requiring medical attention.

Una fantastica experiencia, por Prof. Oscar Adolfo Uriondo (Pages 7-10): This article describes an unusual event experienced by two bank officials, Ivo Dugour and Néstor Berlingieri, in May 1972, while traveling on Route 2 in Argentina. Their Ford Falcon car inexplicably moved for 20-30 km with the engine off and without brakes, while both occupants were in a state of deep drowsiness. Berlingieri, the driver, remembers stopping the car due to irresistible sleepiness, ensuring the doors and windows were secured, and then losing consciousness. Dugour, initially asleep, was awakened by Berlingieri's shouts and found the car moving. Upon reaching Dolores, Berlingieri recounted the event to a service station employee, while Dugour remained calm. Later, with Dugour driving, he experienced a strange sensation in his head, described as a tingling, which slowed his driving. Berlingieri's account corroborates Dugour's up to the point of stopping, but he does not recall securing the car or losing consciousness in the same way. They estimate they might have been stopped about 30 km from Maipú.

Other articles mentioned in the table of contents include:

• Editorial, by Casas Huguet, Presidente del CEI (Page 1)
• Caso fotografico, McMinville, by Michel Bougard (Page 10)
• Dossier especial: El caso del Doctor X., by M. Aimé Michel (Page 16)
• Fenomeno OVNI: Naturaleza, sentido y finalidad, by Casas Huguet del CEI (Page 28)
• ¿Los aterrizajes tienden a producirse en zonas poco densamente pobladas? by Félix Ares de Blas, del CEI (Page 32)
• Libros y critica, by Vicente-Juan Ballester Olmos (Page 40)
• Galaxia OVNI (Page 45)
• Quien es quien, Ted R. Phillips, Jr. (Page 46)

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around unexplained aerial phenomena (UFOs), mysterious encounters, and the psychological and physical effects on witnesses. The magazine adopts a serious and investigative stance, presenting detailed accounts of alleged sightings and experiences, often with a focus on witness testimony and the challenges of investigation. There is an underlying interest in the scientific and sociological aspects of UFO phenomena, as indicated by the references to sociological studies and the publication's affiliation with the Centro de Estudios Interplanetarios. The editorial stance appears to be one of open inquiry into these phenomena, encouraging discussion and further investigation, while acknowledging the need for rigorous analysis and the potential for psychological explanations.

Title: INFORESPACE
Issue: NO 9
Document Type: Magazine Issue
Original Language: Spanish

Article 1: Conclusions on a Sleep-Inducing Experience

The article begins by highlighting the intense and unusual somnolence experienced by witnesses in a case, noting that both were accustomed to nocturnal activities. It states that neither witness saw luminous phenomena or heard strange noises. The conclusions suggest that there are no grounds to doubt the witnesses' veracity, as they did not seek publicity and only a few friends learned of the experience. The possibility of a dream or hallucination is considered unlikely due to the simultaneous and complementary nature of the experience for two individuals. The case is presented as an inexplicable, albeit unique, event when considered in isolation from broader UFO phenomena. The text emphasizes that such incidents gain scientific relevance when analyzed comparatively, moving beyond mere curiosities to become part of a recognized class of phenomena. It references similar enigmatic events in Cauquenes (Chile, 1968), Draguignan (France, 1973), and Mansfield (USA, 1973, the Larry Coyne helicopter case), noting the visible presence of UFOs in some instances.

The inferred conclusion from these incidents is the existence of a force field, possibly gravitational, acting on aerial and terrestrial vehicles, whether deliberately or as an involuntary effect of the UFO's propulsion system. Further detailed and exhaustive investigations are needed to corroborate or refute this hypothesis and to develop scientifically acceptable physical models.

Article 2: The McMinnville Photographic Case

This section details the famous McMinnville UFO case that occurred on May 11, 1950, near McMinnville, Oregon. Mrs. Paul Trent first spotted a slow-moving, bright, silver object heading west. She alerted her husband, and they both observed the artifact. Paul Trent managed to take two photographs (Foto 1 and Foto 2) with a limited number of exposures left on his film. The object was described as silent, without smoke, and appeared to tilt before accelerating and heading west. The photographs were later developed, and the Trents initially kept the event private due to fear of government interference and public scrutiny.

However, the story became public when the "Telephone Register" newspaper published it on June 8, 1950. The journalist, Bill Powel, claimed to have found the negatives on the floor. Local personalities attested to the Trents' credibility. The case gained further attention when "Life" magazine published the photos on June 26, and the Trents appeared on the television show "We the People."

The article discusses the analysis of the photographs by the Condon Committee, which concluded that the negatives were not tampered with. The analysis confirmed that the object was not symmetrical and that the two positions showed the same object that had tilted but not rotated. Experts noted the presence of an antenna-like structure on top. The Condon Committee's analysis suggested the object was about ten meters in diameter and approximately 400 meters away from the witnesses. The committee's final report stated that the McMinnville case was one of the few UFO reports where all factors (geometric, psychological, and physical) agreed with the hypothesis of an extraordinary, artificial, silver, disk-shaped object about ten meters in diameter observed by two witnesses.

Despite the committee's findings, some experts debated whether it could have been a stationary model, but the precision of the photographic measurements argued against this. The article also mentions a third photograph (foto 3) taken in Ruán, France, in March 1954, which reportedly showed a similar object.

Article 3: Report on the Observation of a Mysterious Flying Object in Arrubal

This report details an observation made by D. Anastasio Martínez in Arrubal, Spain, on the night of December 28-29, 1976. Martínez, a night watchman, was working on the construction of a new factory when his motorcycle failed. While attempting to fix it, he observed a powerful white light originating from a parcel of land in the industrial polygon "El Sequero." He saw a fluorescent white object rise from a green-yellow trail, stabilize, and then move rapidly west. The object's trail later appeared reddish, possibly due to the viewing angle.

Martínez visited the site the next day and found what appeared to be landing traces, including several cubic excavations and three semi-spherical impressions. He reported the incident to "La Gaceta del Norte" newspaper, initially seeking to share his experience but later regretting it due to the problems it caused. He also mentioned speaking with a German engineer in Logroño about UFO phenomena.

The investigation team, including Jose L. Guillerna, visited the site and confirmed the presence of the unusual footprints. The article notes the industrial polygon is located about eighteen kilometers from Logroño, near Arrubal and a military airport.

Article 4: The Case of Dr. X

This section introduces a complex and well-observed UFO case involving a Dr. X, a highly qualified biologist in southeastern France, who wishes to remain anonymous. The incident occurred on the night of November 1-2, 1968. Dr. X, who has a talent for music but no knowledge of mathematics, was woken by his 14-month-old son's calls. He noticed intermittent lights outside, which he initially mistook for lightning flashes. The lights were periodic and appeared to be coming from behind his house.

Dr. X experienced significant pain and swelling in his left tibia after an accident while cutting a tree stump on October 29, 1968. The pain and swelling persisted through the following days. On the night of the incident, he was suffering from this leg injury. He observed the lights while trying to calm his son and noted that a storm was brewing. The lights were described as powerful, illuminating the valley and mountains, with a color and intensity similar to a full moon. They appeared non-instantaneous, lasting a fraction of a second, with total darkness in between.

The article also mentions that similar objects were seen in Spain on the same day and the preceding night, and in Morocco and Peru on December 7 and 9, respectively, all occurring at similar times during the night. These similarities are noted but not examined in detail in this article.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around unexplained aerial phenomena (UFOs), witness testimonies, photographic and physical evidence, and the scientific investigation of these cases. The magazine appears to present these cases with a degree of seriousness, detailing the observations, the witnesses' backgrounds, and the analyses conducted by various committees and investigators. The editorial stance seems to be one of open inquiry, presenting detailed accounts and analyses without definitively dismissing the phenomena, while also acknowledging the need for rigorous scientific study and the potential for misinterpretation or hoaxes.

This issue of Flying Saucer Review, Volume 13, Issue 2, dated November 1967, features an in-depth analysis of a significant UFO (OVNI) case involving a witness identified as Dr. X. The magazine's cover headline, "FENOMENO OVNI: NATURALEZA SENTIDO Y FINALIDAD" (UFO Phenomenon: Nature, Meaning, and Purpose), sets the stage for the detailed exploration of this encounter and its implications. The article is translated from English and annotated by Felix Ares de Blas, with medical terms advised by Ignacio Garmendia.

Detailed Account of Dr. X's Encounter

The narrative begins with Dr. X's observation of two luminous objects on the night of November 1st to 2nd, 1968. The objects, described in detail, possessed distinct characteristics: a luminous silver-white upper part and an intense sunset-red lower part. They were observed to have two parts superimposed symmetrically around a horizontal axis. Four 'antennas' were noted on each object, two of which were more prominent.

Initially, the objects appeared as 'cigars' or circular objects viewed from the side. They emitted vertical luminous columns and displayed cyclical flashing activity. The witness described flashes of light that appeared to be 'introduced' through the antennas and then erupted between the objects, creating a unified flash. The flashes were white, non-dazzling, and silent. The objects moved together, approaching the witness. As they moved, a second horizontal antenna became visible on each, and the objects rotated, revealing their lower surfaces.

At one point, the objects appeared side-by-side, identical in size, with their antennas symmetrically positioned. The luminous beams from the objects became visible, originating from a protuberance on their lower red surface. The objects then began to approach each other, their internal antennas interpenetrating until they made contact. This contact transformed into a progressive interpenetration or unification. The single, now larger, object moved towards the witness.

Object Transformation and Dematerialization

As the object approached, its rotation accelerated, and it emitted a beam of light that struck the witness. The witness described the object's lower surface as circular and divided into radial sections. The red part of the object exhibited a peculiar activity with horizontal black lines moving cyclically, giving the impression of an incandescent metal or internal illumination. The witness felt the object was 'sucking atmospheric electricity.'

Suddenly, the object stopped its movement towards the witness and then began to move away, its rotation inclining the upper part towards the valley, revealing more of its lower surface. This rotation accelerated, and the object emitted a beam of light that illuminated the witness and the front of the house. The witness covered his face reflexively.

Following this, the object 'dematerialized' with a 'bang,' leaving behind a whitish cloud that dispersed in the wind. Simultaneously, a bright white rectilinear thread of light shot vertically from the object's former position into the sky and vanished, forming a small bright white point that also disappeared like a firework.

Post-Encounter Effects and Medical Findings

The darkness returned, and the witness experienced nervous shock. He checked his watch and noted it was 4:05 a.m., ten minutes after his initial visit to the kitchen. He recorded the details of the observation and then informed his wife, who was also highly excited. His wife then noticed that a wound on his leg, which had been present since an incident in Algeria, had completely healed, with no trace of swelling or pain.

Ten minutes after going back to sleep, Dr. X began talking in his sleep, describing what he had seen. His wife took notes, recording a phrase about contact being re-established by falling down the stairs on November 2nd.

The following day, Dr. X experienced an inexplicable fall down the stairs, hitting his head. This shock instantly restored his full memory of the event. He also noted that the physical discomforts from his Algerian war injury had vanished.

In the following days, Dr. X developed calambres and pains around his navel, which persisted for a week. On November 17th, he began to feel itching and pricking sensations, and a reddish, striated pigmentation developed around his navel. By November 18th, this pigmentation had formed a well-defined isosceles triangle, measuring 17 cm at the base and 14-15 cm on the sides. Coincidentally, the pains and itching ceased. The same day, a similar triangular mark appeared on his son's stomach.

Dr. X and his wife contacted the author, who advised a medical examination. The examination was negative, with the dermatologist unable to explain the phenomenon and considering it astonishing enough to warrant a communication to the Academy of Medicine. Dr. X, however, dissuaded him.

The author, while trying to reassure Dr. X, suggested a psychosomatic explanation, linking the triangle to his anxiety and the object's shape. However, the author privately doubted this explanation.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The article, presented as a case study, highlights the importance of detailed witness testimony and the potential for UAP encounters to have profound physical and psychological effects on individuals. The author, Casas Huguet, emphasizes the enigmatic and paradoxical nature of the UFO phenomenon, acknowledging the difficulty in defining it due to widespread skepticism. He asserts the objective reality of the phenomenon and its connection to an intelligent factor capable of manifesting in various ways, from sightings of craft and lights to inexplicable physical effects like rapid healing and unusual skin markings.

The magazine's editorial stance, as suggested by the article's content and the translator's notes, appears to be one of serious investigation into UFO phenomena, presenting detailed accounts and encouraging further study. The case of Dr. X is presented as a significant example of the complex and often inexplicable nature of these events, underscoring the need for continued research and open-mindedness.

Title: Investigación
Issue Date: April 1977
Publisher: STENDEK-CEI
Country of Publication: Spain
Language: Spanish

This issue of "Investigación" features a detailed statistical analysis and discussion concerning the relationship between UFO sightings and population density, primarily focusing on Spain. The central theme revolves around questioning and re-evaluating previous conclusions, particularly those presented by researcher Vicente-Juan Ballester Olmos.

Article 1: "¿LOS ATERRIZAJES TIENDEN A PRODUCIRSE EN ZONAS POCO DENSAMENTE POBLADAS?" by Félix Ares de Blas

This extensive article critically examines the hypothesis that UFO landings occur more frequently in sparsely populated areas. The author, Félix Ares de Blas, begins by referencing a previous STENDEK publication (issue 27) by Vicente-Juan Ballester Olmos, which presented findings from a 1976 Center for UFO Studies conference in Chicago. Olmos's conclusions suggested that while the global distribution of aerial objects might be random, close encounters are selective and tend to avoid populated areas.

Ares de Blas agrees with the first point, citing a study he co-authored on the 1968-1969 UFO wave, which found a correlation of 0.72 indicating a random global distribution. However, he strongly disputes Olmos's second conclusion regarding landing sites and population density.

Olmos's argument, based on a graph (Figure 3), posited an inverse relationship between population density and the number of landing cases per million inhabitants. Ares de Blas aims to demonstrate that this assertion is false.

To do this, Ares de Blas revisits a hypothetical scenario from page 69 of Olmos's study, involving a nation with two provinces, L (75% of territory, 25% of population) and M (25% of territory, 75% of population). Assuming random distribution, L would have 75% of cases and M 25%. However, due to population density differences, the probability of sightings would be affected. Ares de Blas presents equations [1] and [2] to calculate these probabilities, yielding results where province L has a 50% probability and M has 50%.

He then translates these results into units comparable to Olmos's graph, assuming a country of 100 km², 100 million inhabitants, and 100 UFO cases. This leads to calculations showing that a less dense area (1/3 density) would have 2 cases per million inhabitants, while a denser area (3 density) would have only 2/3 of a case per million. This contradicts Olmos's findings.

The article proceeds to divide Spain into 8 groups based on provincial population densities from 1968, excluding African provinces. It calculates relative densities and surface areas for each group. Ares de Blas then attempts to re-create Olmos's graph using his own theoretical model based on random distribution and the derived probabilities. He notes that Olmos's graph shows a clear inverse correlation, while his own calculations, when applied to 8 groups, suggest that the number of UFOs per million inhabitants is largely independent of density, showing almost a constant.

Ares de Blas argues that the model used is overly sensitive and that different groupings of provinces could yield different results, including positive or negative correlations, or no correlation at all. He concludes that the number of sightings per million has no clear or simple relationship with density, and any result can be obtained depending on the distribution assumptions.

He further discusses the limitations of Olmos's model, particularly the need to account for population migration and varying densities over time. He suggests that a more robust model would consider ponderated densities over many years, taking into account factors like orography and climate, which might influence visibility rather than actual landing frequency.

Despite the lack of clear correlation in his analysis, Ares de Blas acknowledges that the 1968-1969 data showed a simple linear correlation of 0.48, which encourages further investigation. He also notes that for low-altitude sightings during the 1968-1969 wave, provinces like Palencia and Sevilla (low and high density, respectively) were prominent, while Madrid and Valencia (high density) also appeared, complicating a simple density-based explanation.

Article 2: "El modo de operar en nuestra realidad" (The way of operating in our reality)

This section, likely an editorial or commentary, discusses the nature of intelligent entities operating within our reality. It suggests that these entities utilize and exploit the full potential of energy in its various forms, operating within the natural laws of our environment. Their actions would not appear alien or contrary to nature because they would possess the knowledge and ability to use these potentials. This requires a profound understanding of reality and its possibilities.

The author posits that the technology observed in UFO phenomena (designs, dynamics, propulsion, visual effects) represents a future technology, achievable by humanity. It is also suggested that the entities behind UFOs can overcome the limitations of space and time, which are inherent to our material reality but perhaps not to a "different" world. This mastery implies operating from "other" coordinates that neutralize or transcend our perceived limitations.

The key to this understanding lies in the knowledge and comprehension available to the intelligent entity. The article implies that the UFO phenomenon might be a manifestation designed to foster a deeper understanding of reality and our place within it.

Commentary on UFOs and Human Consciousness

Another section speculates on the purpose of UFO manifestations. It suggests that while some encounters might have negative characteristics (aggression, fear, violence), these agents might not necessarily be "extraterrestrial" in the sense of being entirely alien to Earth. The core idea is that UFO phenomena, with their implications, might be intended to foster a significant collaboration in developing a buried sense within humanity. This sense would alert and impel individuals towards seeking and capturing a universal harmony and cosmic quality – the quality of love inherent in existence itself.

This process would simultaneously help humans to understand and accept the concept of "relativity," which affects all ontological facets of our being, actions, and knowledge. It is suggested that all hypotheses are valid as they can contribute to dynamizing and enhancing our consciousness, driving our quest for knowledge. This pursuit aims to reduce the reliance on the concept of the "strange," which causes unease, especially when considering our limited knowledge.

The author expresses a personal opinion that the persistence of UFO manifestations implies a significant collaboration aimed at revealing a buried sense within humanity, promoting a universal harmony and cosmic love. This process helps us understand the relativity of all things and encourages the pursuit of knowledge, reducing our reliance on the concept of "strange."

Potential Purpose of UFO Phenomena

The article proposes that the UFO phenomenon might be linked to promoting human maturity and consciousness. It suggests that these manifestations could be a way to help humanity overcome an evolutionary crisis stemming from a disharmonious progress where material aspects have outpaced ethical and moral development. This imbalance leads to psychological tensions affecting individuals.

Conclusion on UFOs and Density

The author concludes that the number of UFO sightings per million inhabitants is not clearly or simply related to population density. Therefore, any outcome can be achieved under the assumption of random distribution. The article emphasizes the sensitivity of the models used and the need for more robust approaches to analyze UFO data.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the statistical analysis of UFO sightings, particularly landings, and their relationship with population density in Spain. The editorial stance is critical and analytical, aiming to challenge existing hypotheses and propose alternative interpretations based on rigorous (though sometimes complex) statistical modeling. There is a clear emphasis on scientific inquiry and a cautious approach to drawing definitive conclusions about the nature and purpose of UFO phenomena, while also exploring their potential psychological and evolutionary implications for humanity.

This issue of Stendek magazine, dated March 1977, delves into various aspects of UFO phenomena and related research. The cover prominently features the title "OVNIS: EL FENOMENO ATERRIZAJE" (UFOs: The Landing Phenomenon), indicating a central theme.

Editorial Content

The issue begins with a letter from Félix Ares de Blas of San Sebastián, dated June 1977, discussing the topic of UFOs and inviting dialogue. He mentions his group's work, directed by David G. López and himself, and references a collective work "Estudio de la Oleada 68-69" and an article by Vicente J. Ballester Olmos.

Erratas del Nº 28: This section corrects errors from a previous issue, specifically regarding a "Grabado" (engraving) on page 20 and text on page 27.

Pruebas de Dureza Sobre el Terreno: This article describes elemental tests conducted on terrain, likely related to a UFO landing site. It details experiments with soil hardness using a nail and a 1 kg weight, estimating the weight of a landed object to be around 2,500 kg, comparable to a light jet aircraft.

• Libros y Crítica (Books and Criticism): This regular column, curated by Vicente-Juan Ballester Olmos, reviews significant books and works in the field of ufology. The column aims to guide researchers toward serious and distinguished literature, with an emphasis on English and French publications. It highlights the necessity of such a guide due to the vast amount of UFO information being published. The column reviews:
• "International UFO Reporter (IUR)": A monthly publication from the Center for UFO Studies (CUFOS), featuring statistics, selected cases, and technical evaluations. Subscription is $15.
• "UFO PHENOMENA International Annual Review (UPIAR)": Described as a true scientific journal, this annual publication covers physical aspects of UFO phenomena, data accumulation, close encounters, psychological aspects, and the epistemology of UFO research. The first volume (1976) was published in June 1977, and the 1977 volume was due in March 1978. It is directed by physicist Roberto Farabone.
• "Proceedings of the 1976 CUFOS Conference": A 320-page volume featuring papers by prominent North American and European ufologists from a May 1976 conference in Chicago. It covers topics like UFO waves, prediction, advanced technology in UFO research, statistical analysis of UFO data, and physical-theoretical aspects of the UFO question. The price is $15.
• "Knowing about UFOs" by Ron Westrum (MUFOB).
• "Apparitions OVNI et inquiétude de la population" by D. Boueyre and P. Vie-roudy (LDLN).
• "Pour mesurer les hauteurs angulaires" (LDLN).

• Artículos (Articles):
• An article discusses the analysis of photographs from San José de Valderas, concluding they were a fraud involving a small model suspended by a thread. This was detailed in the Spring 1977 CUFOS bulletin.

Con Relación al "Triángulo de las Bermudas" (Regarding the "Bermuda Triangle"): This extensive section addresses the mystery of the Bermuda Triangle. It explains that many readers have requested information on the topic. The author, Lawrence David Kusche, presents the epilogue of his book "EL MISTERIO DEL TRIANGULO DE LAS BERMUDAS SOLUCIONADO" (The Mystery of the Bermuda Triangle Solved). Kusche, a librarian, states that his research led him to conclude that no single theory resolves the mystery. He argues that trying to find a common cause for all disappearances in the Triangle is illogical, similar to trying to find a single cause for all car accidents in Arizona. By examining each incident individually, the mystery began to unravel. The article lists several findings:
1. Most unresolved accidents lack information.
2. Many cases are embellished with fictional details.
3. Disappearances occur globally, not just in the Bermuda Triangle.
4. Some ships that disappeared may not have done so within the Triangle.
5. Locations of some disappearances are unknown.
6. Many incidents became mysterious only later due to writers embellishing accounts.
7. Contrary to legend, weather was often unfavorable, with hurricanes being responsible for many accidents.
8. Most accidents occurred late in the day or at night, delaying rescue operations.
9. Many writers copied previous accounts, perpetuating errors and embellishments.
10. Writers sometimes omitted information that provided obvious solutions.
Kusche concludes that the "legend" of the Bermuda Triangle is a manufactured mystery, built on careless research, errors, and sensationalism. He suggests that the area is not uniquely dangerous and that the phenomenon is not a singular mystery.

• Galaxia OVNI (UFO Galaxy): This section presents various short reports and statements related to UFOs:
• Dr. Claude Poher's article in "INFOR ESPACE" refutes the UMMO case point by point.
• Professor Martynof states that UFOs don't exist, but contact with extraterrestrials might occur via radio emissions.
• Ray Stanford, President of the Starlinght Program, suggests governments withhold UFO information but admits some secret information is later published with omissions.
• The French group "Lumières dans la Nuit" developed a pocket goniometer for measuring object dimensions and distances.
• A Colombian archaeologist, Eli Curvoli, claims to have found evidence of extraterrestrial visits in Central America dating back 2000 years, exhibiting stone statuettes.
• Eric Gairy, Prime Minister of Grenada, discussed with UN Secretary-General Kurt Waldheim the possibility of creating a UN agency for UFO research.

Quien es Quien (Who's Who): This section profiles Ted R. Phillips, Jr., coordinator of the "Mutual UFO Network" (MUFON). He is an inspector for the Department of Highways in Missouri, has directed investigations into UFO landing traces for six years, and has a database of 837 cases. He is considered a leading authority in the US. Phillips is also an amateur astronomer and professional photographer. He has investigated over 300 UFO sightings and collaborated with Dr. J. Allen Hynek.

DE INTERES PARA NUESTROS LECTORES (Of Interest to Our Readers): This is a call to readers to report any possible UFO sightings to CEI (Apartado 282, Barcelona) for a questionnaire.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently promotes scientific investigation into UFO phenomena, emphasizing critical analysis and the debunking of sensationalized claims, as seen in the Bermuda Triangle section and the review of Claude Poher's work. There's a clear preference for rigorous, evidence-based research over speculation. The publication also serves as a platform for reviewing and recommending relevant literature and research, acting as a guide for its readership. The editorial stance appears to be one of cautious skepticism towards extraordinary claims, while remaining open to genuine scientific inquiry into the UFO phenomenon.