AI Magazine Summary

1997-2-skeptikko

Summary & Cover Skeptikko

Ever wanted to host your own late-night paranormal radio show?

Across the Airwaves · Narrative Sim · Windows · $2.95

You’re on the air. Callers bring Mothman, Fresno Nightcrawlers, UFO sightings, reptilian autopsies, and whispers about AATIP and Project Blue Book. Every reply shapes how the night goes.

UFO & UAP Cryptids Paranormal Government Secrets Classified Files High Strangeness Strange Creatures
The night is long. The lines are open →

20,263

issue summaries

Free. Always.

Support the Archive

Building and maintaining this collection is something I genuinely enjoy. If you’ve found it useful and want to say thanks, a small contribution keeps me motivated to keep expanding it. Thank you for your kindness 💚

Donate with PayPal

AI-Generated Summary

Overview

Title: Skeptikko Issue: 2/97 (Numero 33) Date: June 30, 1997 Publisher: Skepsis ry Country: Finland Language: Finnish ISSN: 0786-2571

Magazine Overview

Title: Skeptikko
Issue: 2/97 (Numero 33)
Date: June 30, 1997
Publisher: Skepsis ry
Country: Finland
Language: Finnish
ISSN: 0786-2571

This issue of Skeptikko magazine celebrates the 10th anniversary of the Skepsis association, a Finnish organization dedicated to promoting critical thinking and scientific skepticism. The cover prominently features 'Skepsis 10 vuotta' (Skepsis 10 years) and lists several key articles, including a contribution from Prime Minister Paavo Lipponen.

Articles and Content

"Vuosikymmen kriittistä ajattelua" (A Decade of Critical Thinking) by Raimo Tuomela

Raimo Tuomela, Professor at the Academy of Finland and member of Skepsis' Scientific Advisory Board, reflects on the founding of Skepsis in March 1987. The association was inspired by the goals and principles of CSICOP (Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal), emphasizing the critical examination of paranormal claims using empirical scientific methods. Tuomela highlights that critical thinking is essential not only for scientific inquiry but also for navigating everyday issues, particularly in areas like health and nutrition where pseudoscience is prevalent. He notes the growth of Skepsis, with its membership doubling in the last three years, as evidence of its successful approach.

"Kvanttifysiikan pseudotieteellisiä selityksiä" (Pseudoscience Explanations of Quantum Physics) by Kari Enqvist

Kari Enqvist, Docent of Theoretical Physics, discusses how the counter-intuitive nature of quantum mechanics has led to pseudoscientific interpretations. He explains that quantum mechanics, which describes the world of atoms and subatomic particles, involves paradoxes that have puzzled philosophers and physicists for decades. Enqvist criticizes New Age mystics for misinterpreting quantum concepts, such as the idea of a universal quantum connection or consciousness being a quantum phenomenon. He clarifies that quantum mechanics, while strange, is a highly precise theory (e.g., Quantum Electrodynamics - QED) and does not support paranormal claims or the idea that consciousness can directly influence reality.

Enqvist elaborates on the probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics, using the thought experiment of Schrödinger's cat to illustrate the concept of superposition. He explains that the wave function describes probabilities, not definite states, until a measurement is made. He also touches upon the concepts of quantum potential and the 'pilot-wave theory' of David Bohm, noting that while these ideas appeal to mystics, they lack empirical support and are not widely accepted by the physics community.

The article also introduces the concept of 'decoherence,' which explains how macroscopic objects, like Schrödinger's cat, are always in a definite state (either dead or alive) due to constant interaction with their environment, thus resolving the paradox without invoking consciousness.

"Tiede, maailmankuva ja yhteiskunta" (Science, Worldview, and Society) by Nils Mustelin

Nils Mustelin, Professor, explores the historical development of human worldviews, from early animistic beliefs and magical thinking to the scientific revolution. He highlights how the scientific method, emphasizing empirical observation and logical reasoning, emerged as a powerful tool for understanding the universe, challenging ancient dogmas like the Aristotelian view of an immutable cosmos. Mustelin points to Copernicus' heliocentric model as a pivotal moment that revolutionized our understanding of the universe and ourselves.

He argues that science, through its rigorous methodology and the constant refinement of theories, provides a reliable way to map reality. Mustelin also addresses the paradox of science's position in society: while governments often support scientific research, a significant portion of the public remains scientifically illiterate, susceptible to pseudoscience and unfounded beliefs. He stresses the importance of science education in schools, particularly in physics, philosophy, and psychology, to foster critical thinking and a scientific worldview.

Mustelin concludes by emphasizing that a sustainable future requires not only ethical values but also a deep understanding of the laws governing the natural world and human behavior, which can only be provided by scientific research.

"Sielujen kvanttisympatiaa" (Quantum Sympathy of Souls)

This section critiques the pseudoscientific application of quantum concepts to human consciousness and well-being. It discusses figures like Fred Alan Wolf, who uses the concept of quantum vacuum to describe a 'world spirit,' and Deepak Chopra, who promotes 'quantum healing,' suggesting consciousness can influence health. The article dismisses these ideas as 'verbal minestrone' and 'utter nonsense,' lacking any scientific basis or empirical evidence. It points out that the wave functions of quantum phenomena are far too small to have any macroscopic effect on human biology or consciousness.

"Tietoisuus ja kvantti" (Consciousness and Quantum)

This part of the article further debunks the pseudoscientific claims linking consciousness to quantum mechanics. It criticizes authors like Danah Zohar for misrepresenting scientific concepts, such as Bose-Einstein condensates, to support their theories about consciousness. The author points out that Zohar's claims are not supported by scientific evidence and that her husband's 'formal argumentation' is based on simplistic logic rather than rigorous science.

"Dekoherenssi tappaa aallot" (Decoherence Kills Waves)

This section, written by Kari Enqvist, clarifies the concept of decoherence. It explains that while quantum mechanics is counter-intuitive, the paradoxes like Schrödinger's cat are resolved by decoherence. This process, occurring in macroscopic systems, causes the loss of quantum wave properties due to constant interaction with the environment. Therefore, the cat is definitively either dead or alive, and quantum effects do not mysteriously influence the macroscopic world as claimed by quantum mystics.

Other Sections

  • Pääministeri Paavo Lipponen: "Epäily viihtyy moniarvoisessa kulttuurissa" (Prime Minister Paavo Lipponen: "Doubt thrives in a pluralistic culture"): A statement from the Prime Minister on the role of skepticism.
  • "Mustelinista Skepsiksen kunniajäsen" (Mustelin becomes an honorary member of Skepsis): An announcement regarding Nils Mustelin.
  • "Bara Normal" (Just Normal) section includes articles like "Rotuoppia ja kanavointia" (Race Theory and Channeling) and "Seppänen Randin jalanjäljillä" (Seppänen in Rand's Footsteps).
  • "G. Törnwall: Petollinen luku 666" (G. Törnwall: The Treacherous Number 666): An article likely examining numerology or superstition.
  • "Vapaa-ajattelija ja skeptikko Kari Saari kuollut" (Freethinker and Skeptic Kari Saari has died): An obituary.
  • "Lyhyet" (Shorts), "Keskustelua" (Discussion), and "Tulevia tapahtumia" (Upcoming Events): Regular sections of the magazine.
  • "English Summary": A summary of the issue in English.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue of Skeptikko revolve around the importance of critical thinking, scientific literacy, and the debunking of pseudoscience. The magazine strongly advocates for evidence-based reasoning and the scientific method as the most reliable means of understanding the world. There is a clear editorial stance against the misapplication and misinterpretation of scientific concepts, particularly from quantum physics, by New Age and pseudoscientific movements. The magazine also emphasizes the role of education in fostering a scientifically informed society and highlights the historical development of scientific thought as a counterpoint to unfounded beliefs. The anniversary theme underscores Skepsis' commitment to these principles over its first decade.

Title: Skeptikko
Issue: 2/97
Date: 1997
Publisher: Skepsis ry
Country: Finland
Language: Finnish

This issue of Skeptikko magazine marks the 10th anniversary of the organization Skepsis ry, founded in 1987. The cover prominently features Prime Minister Paavo Lipponen, who discusses the prevalence of doubt in a pluralistic culture. The magazine delves into the history of Skepsis, its mission to promote scientific inquiry, and its efforts to combat pseudoscience.

Prime Minister Paavo Lipponen: Doubt Thrives in a Pluralistic Culture

Prime Minister Paavo Lipponen, attending Skepsis's 10th-anniversary seminar, commented on Professor Nils Mustelin's presentation about the necessity of a scientific worldview. Lipponen noted that Finnish society has only recently, since the late 1950s, developed into a strongly pluralistic urban culture where healthy doubt can thrive. However, he felt the goal had not yet been fully achieved, citing the lack of engaging television satire. He acknowledged his own philosophical studies, which he did not complete, and expressed admiration for English philosophy's emphasis on tolerance, which he believes opens avenues for scientific methods. Lipponen disagreed with Mustelin that physics and philosophy are the most crucial subjects for building a scientific worldview, arguing that history is also vital for understanding society and democracy. He asserted that the scientific worldview adopted by Finns is a sufficient defense against "hooey" (huuhaa) and is crucial for navigating an increasingly globalized, media-dominated world. He called for healthy skepticism and critical discussion regarding politicians' claims, believing this leads to a more stable political environment with less room for unfounded beliefs.

Skepsis: A Decade of Questioning

The magazine highlights key questions posed by Skepsis over its ten years, including "Where is the soul located in the brain?", "Why does astrology seem to work?", "Are there well-documented paranormal phenomena?", "Can personality be analyzed from handwriting?", "Why do people believe in paranormal phenomena?", "Does psi replace the mobile phone?", "How to smalltalk with humanoid abductees?", "Does excessive homeopathic dilution pose an overdose risk?", "Does a cat know it is a cat?", and "Do our eyes lie?"

Glimpses from Skepsis's Ten-Year Journey

The article details the founding of Skepsis ry on March 3, 1987, by about thirty people aiming to scientifically investigate paranormal claims. Professor Raimo Tuomela, inspired by the US organization CSICOP and its journal Skeptical Inquirer, was instrumental in its establishment. The association was officially named Skepsis ry on May 28, 1987, with rules closely following CSICOP's principles. The first board included S. Albert Kivinen as chairman, with Tuomela, Hannu Karttunen, Heta Häyry, Nils Mustelin, Nils Edelman, Pekka Hartola, and Matti Virtanen also involved. Initially, the founders envisioned conducting research, but soon realized their limited capacity for independent investigation, shifting focus to disseminating information and public education.

Skepsis began publishing the Skeptikko magazine four times a year and organized public lectures. The year 1989 was particularly active, with the magazine becoming regular and the organization hosting an international conference and publishing a book with Ursa, "The Devil's Advocate," which examined scientific perspectives on topics like astrology and UFOs. During this conference, Skepsis issued a challenge, offering 10,000 Finnish marks to anyone who could demonstrate paranormal abilities under controlled conditions. In the autumn of 1989, Skepsis awarded its first "Huuhaa" prize to WSOY for publishing pseudoscientific literature. Subsequent Huuhaa awards recognized organizations and programs that promoted unscientific claims.

In 1991, Skepsis joined the Federation of Finnish Scientific Societies, aiming to be a scientific organization despite not conducting its own research. Its approach has often been to critically examine paranormal claims from a scientific perspective, often with a touch of humor. The organization has faced internal discussions about whether to act as a "capture group" for research or maintain its public outreach role. Professors Nils Mustelin and Lauri Gröhn, former chairmen, were particularly active in publicizing Skepsis's work through media appearances.

Lauri Gröhn emphasized that people have the right to know that there is no scientific evidence for paranormal phenomena, and Skepsis aims to inform them so they can make their own decisions. Despite efforts to avoid ridiculing believers, Skepsis's public activities sometimes drew criticism from fringe science enthusiasts, who labeled skeptics as narrow-minded.

Skepsis participated in fringe science fairs, and while initially fearing a flood of research requests after issuing its challenge, only one individual has so far attempted to claim the prize. The organization has also struggled to engage in meaningful dialogue with believers, with Professor Tuomela suggesting that offering well-reasoned information is more effective than trying to force belief changes.

Image Issues and Online Presence

Anneli Aurejärvi, the former secretary, urged members to shed the stereotype of skeptics as joyless killjoys. The organization's image has been shaped by the annual Huuhaa award and public appearances by active members, leading to increased attendance at lectures and media recognition. Skepsis has seen a rise in younger members, reflecting its goal to encourage young people to seek knowledge and ask questions. The organization emphasizes its openness to anyone interested in critically examining paranormal phenomena, regardless of their background.

Skepsis launched its website in the early 1990s, providing access to skeptical information and attracting new members, particularly among the youth. In 1995, Skepsis established the "Sokrates Prize" to recognize individuals who promote critical thinking. The first recipient was Sini Hirsikangas-Huttunen, a teacher who encouraged her students to explore the background of paranormal phenomena.

Skepsis maintains connections with international sister organizations through participation in conferences and correspondence. Magician James Randi, a co-founder of CSICOP, has been a frequent visitor. Skepsis joined the European Council of Skeptic Organizations (ECSO) and has organized joint events with Estonian skeptics.

Professor Tuomela expressed satisfaction with Skepsis's decade-long journey but regretted the lack of resources for independent research. He believes the organization's chosen path of public education is appropriate for Finland's size.

Huuhaa and Sokrates Awards Over the Years

Since 1989, Skepsis has awarded the Huuhaa prize to communities or individuals contributing to the spread of pseudoscientific beliefs. Early recipients included WSOY for publishing pseudoscientific literature, the Vantaa adult education center for teaching astrology and graphology, and the Finnish Scientology organization. The award has also been given to the Tietomaa science center for a UFO-themed exhibition and to Yleisradio for presenting unscientific claims uncritically on its television programs. In 1996, Kirjayhtymä received the award for publishing "Therapeutic Touch" by Anja Rautajoki.

In 1995, Skepsis established the Sokrates Prize to encourage critical thinking and educational work. The first recipient was Sini Hirsikangas-Huttunen. In 1996, the Finnish Astronomical Association Ursa received the award for increasing public interest in the scientific worldview.

Nils Mustelin: Skepsis's Honorary Member

Professor Nils Mustelin, a critical observer and commentator on paranormal phenomena, has become known as "Mister Skepsis." He was a founding member and served as chairman from 1989 to 1993. Mustelin, who became interested in astronomy as a child, finds the continued fascination with astrology perplexing. He clarifies that he is not an astrology expert but understands it as a pseudoscience lacking empirical basis. He humorously recalls being called "mustelinit" by a columnist, referring to him and other skeptics as "yapping dogs" that attack the innocent. Mustelin notes that Skepsis has become more visible, with journalists now proactively seeking comments on paranormal claims. He observes the rise of pseudoscientific claims spread through paid phone services, a phenomenon not present a decade ago. Mustelin, a retired physicist, has received state awards for science popularization and was granted the title of professor in 1989. He also has a passion for music.

Seppänen Randin: Magicians as Debunkers

The article profiles magician Iiro Seppänen, who follows in the footsteps of American skeptic magician James Randi. Seppänen, a member of Skepsis for four years, joined after meeting Randi and learning about Skepsis's activities. He aims to support the fight against the exploitation of public credulity, stating that unlike some magicians, he does not seek to create the impression of supernatural events. Instead, he explains the natural basis for his tricks. The article notes that magic has historically been used in deceptions, and magicians like Harry Houdini and James Randi have played roles in exposing such fraud. Seppänen praises Randi's work and dedication, highlighting the ongoing need for debunking fraudulent claims.

Normal is Bare

This section humorously discusses claims of encountering various humanoid alien species, likening them to dogs. It satirizes conspiracy theories and the idea of aliens communicating with world leaders, referencing the Hale-Bopp comet. The author suggests that to prepare for space travel, one needs to be mindful of one's "astral body" and "aura." A postscript humorously attributes a lack of materialization in the text to "earth radiation" and mentions a "homeopathic hangover."

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are skepticism, critical thinking, the debunking of pseudoscience, and the promotion of scientific literacy. Skepsis ry positions itself as an organization dedicated to scientific inquiry and education, aiming to counter the spread of unfounded beliefs through public outreach, publications, and awards. The magazine highlights the importance of healthy doubt and critical evaluation in society, as articulated by Prime Minister Paavo Lipponen and exemplified by the work of figures like Professor Nils Mustelin and magician James Randi. The editorial stance is clearly in favor of science and reason, actively challenging pseudoscientific claims and encouraging a more informed public discourse.

This issue of Skeptikko magazine, dated 2/97, features a cover story titled "jalanjäljillä" (Footprints), accompanied by a photograph of magician Iiro Seppänen and docent Marjaana Lindeman-Viitasalo. The magazine delves into a variety of topics related to skepticism, pseudoscience, and the paranormal.

Articles and Features

The Number of the Beast: Gematria and 666

The article "Petollinen luku 666" (The Deceitful Number 666) by G. Törnwall explores the biblical 'number of the beast' and how it has been interpreted throughout history using gematria. It explains how letters in ancient languages like Aramaic, Hebrew, and Greek had numerical values, and how later alphabets were assigned values. The article provides examples of how names, including those of historical figures and even modern ones like Bill Gates (using ASCII codes), can be manipulated through gematria to arrive at the number 666. It also touches upon the historical attempts to link this number to figures like Roman emperors Nero and Domitianus, Martin Luther, and Aleister Crowley.

Iiro Seppänen: The Art of Deception

An article profiles magician Iiro Seppänen, who discusses how easily people can be deceived and how magicians exploit human senses and cognitive biases. Seppänen aims to use these principles rather than work against them. He is noted for his demonstration at Skepsis's tenth-anniversary celebration.

Kari Saari: A Tribute

The magazine marks the passing of Kari Saari, a prominent freethinker, chairman of the Finnish Freethinkers' Association, and a founding member of Skepsis ry. The article highlights his contributions to the freethought movement, his work as a consumer advisor, and his passion for science and rationalism. His colleague Kimmo Sundström remembers him as a significant influence on the Finnish freethought movement.

Astrology and Helsinki Media

An article titled "Helsinki Media kauppaa astrologiaa" (Helsinki Media Sells Astrology) discusses Helsinki Media's venture into the astrology market with a 12-part "Rakkaus Horoskooppikirjasto" (Love Horoscope Library) and a CD-ROM titled "Sinä ja tähdet" (You and the Stars). The article features Adrian Ross Duncan, the program's creator, and includes commentary from Lauri Gröhn, former chairman of Skepsis, who expresses skepticism about the scientific validity of astrology.

Skeptical Sightings and Claims

Several short pieces cover various skeptical topics:

  • Uri Geller's Magic: James Randi reports on Uri Geller's alleged magical abilities, including a failed attempt to help the Exeter football team win a match.
  • Celestial Naming Rights: The article "Skeptisiä taivaankappaleita" (Skeptical Celestial Bodies) mentions that skeptics like James Randi, Paul Kurtz, and Martin Gardner have had asteroids named after them, as has the name "Skepticus" for an asteroid between Mars and Jupiter.
  • Hale-Bopp Comet: The phenomenon surrounding the Hale-Bopp comet is discussed, including claims of a companion object, which was later identified as a star, and the conspiracy theories that arose.
  • Swiss UFO Believer: Ines Laura Acedaih Dafi, a Swiss TV personality, claims to be a mediator between humans and extraterrestrial beings.
  • Roswell Incident: The article "Roswellin ufot vauhdittivat Tampereen paikallistoiminnan käynnistymistä" (Roswell UFOs Spurred the Launch of Skepsis's Local Operations in Tampere) mentions the 50th anniversary of the Roswell incident and its discussion by Skepsis chairman Ilpo V. Salmi.
  • New Age Practices: A report from Tampere mentions a "naiskulttuuripäivillä" (women's culture days) featuring various New Age therapies like aquabalancing, reiki, and homeopathy.

Skepsis ry Updates

  • New Website: Skepsis ry has launched a new, permanent website at HTTP://WWW.SKEPSIS.FI.
  • Tampere Chapter: The Tampere chapter of Skepsis ry has been established, with initial activities including an information booth at the "Sateenkaari messut" (Rainbow Fair).
  • Hannu Karttunen Awarded: Hannu Karttunen, editor-in-chief of Skeptikko, received a state award for his book "Vanhin tiede" (The Oldest Science).

Skepsis Challenge

Skepsis ry has issued a challenge offering 10,000 Finnish marks for the production of a paranormal phenomenon under controlled conditions. An additional offer of 30,000 marks is available if a humanoid can be produced, with the event potentially televised.

Discussion on Postmodernism

The "Keskustelua" (Discussion) section features a debate between Timo Kaitaro and Juha Savolainen regarding the Sokal affair and postmodernist thought. Kaitaro criticizes the grouping of various thinkers, while Savolainen defends the concept of a 'discourse' and argues for the importance of detailed analysis of different philosophical ideas.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently promotes critical thinking, scientific inquiry, and skepticism towards paranormal claims, astrology, and pseudoscientific theories. It provides a platform for debunking hoaxes, discussing controversial topics from a rational perspective, and celebrating the achievements of skeptics. The editorial stance is clearly in favor of evidence-based reasoning and against unsubstantiated beliefs.

Title: Skeptikko
Issue: 2/97
Date: 1997
Publisher: Skepsis ry
Country: Finland
Language: Finnish

This issue of Skeptikko magazine, published by Skepsis ry, explores various facets of skepticism, science communication, and the critical examination of paranormal claims. It features a lively debate surrounding the Sokal affair, discussions on the public perception of skeptics, and information on upcoming events and the organization itself.

The Sokal Affair Debate

The issue prominently features a discussion on the Sokal affair, initiated by articles from Markku Javanainen and Juha Savolainen, with a response from Timo Kaitaro. Javanainen critiques the superficiality of some discussions surrounding the Sokal hoax, particularly in the Finnish context, and points to a Finnish translation of an article in Alkoholipolitiikka magazine. He also highlights the existence of a 'PostModern Generator' program that creates postmodern texts, suggesting that the Sokal affair's impact has been significant enough to inspire such tools. Savolainen, in his response, thanks Kaitaro and Javanainen for their courteous replies and notes that their fundamental views on postmodernism do not significantly differ. He emphasizes that his criticism was directed at the methods used in the debate, finding them less civil than expected from a philosophical background.

Timo Kaitaro, responding to Savolainen and Javanainen, acknowledges their points but reiterates his critique of the methods employed. He argues that using citations to create associations and mental images in the context of the hoax is a form of 'magical thinking' that needs demystification. Kaitaro clarifies that he does not consider the ideas of figures like Chomsky or Hobsbawm to be 'magical' but rather potentially erroneous or incorrect, distinguishing this from the manipulative use of imagery.

Public Image of Skeptics

Juha Salminen addresses the public perception of skeptics in his article "Skeptikoiden huonoista pöytätavoista" (Skeptics' Poor Table Manners). He draws a parallel between the portrayal of 'skeptics' and 'mystics' in popular culture, noting that skeptics are often depicted as argumentative and pedantic, while mystics are seen as wise and holistic.

Salminen argues that the negative image of skeptics is partly due to individuals who, under the banner of skepticism, exhibit aggressive and overly judgmental attitudes, damaging the movement's reputation. He proposes that Skepsis should actively work on improving its image by clarifying its philosophical underpinnings and fostering a more educational approach. He suggests adopting the 'golden rule' of discussion: respecting one's conversational partner, appealing to both reason and emotion, and presenting different perspectives fairly. Salminen observes that skeptics often get bogged down in minor factual errors of their opponents, losing sight of the main argument, whereas mystics can be more effective by appealing to broader sentiments.

Scientific Explanations and Skeptical Activities

An article by Jukka Häkkinen, "Unihalvaus fysiologiaa" (Sleep Paralysis Physiology), offers a scientific explanation for sleep paralysis, a phenomenon often linked to abduction experiences. He explains it as an evolutionary adaptation where the brain temporarily immobilizes the limbs during sleep to prevent injury, a mechanism that can manifest as a terrifying sensation of being unable to move during dreams.

Letters and Corrections

S. Albert Kivinen provides corrections to his previous article "Rudolf Steiner filosofina" (Rudolf Steiner as a Philosopher) in Skeptikko 1/97, rectifying several typographical errors and clarifying references.

Reader Feedback and Magazine Direction

An anonymous letter to the editor, quoted in "Skeptikon linja puhuttaa" (Skeptics' Line Provokes Discussion), expresses appreciation for Skeptikko magazine's quality but notes that its academic level can be too high for the average reader. The writer suggests that the magazine should provide more explanations of complex theories and concepts, use more examples, and avoid overly specialized jargon to make it more accessible to a broader audience, including those with non-humanistic backgrounds. The letter emphasizes that Skepsis aims to reach a wider public, not just academics, and that overly technical articles alienate potential readers.

Upcoming Events and Conferences

The magazine announces several upcoming events. Skepsis ry is organizing public lectures throughout the autumn of 1997, with dates set for September 17, October 15, November 12, and December 13, the latter marking the association's anniversary seminar where the Huuhaa and Sokrates prizes will be awarded.

A summer event, "72 tuntia huijausta" (72 Hours of Hoax), is planned for July 10-12 in Jyväskylä, Finland. This event will feature James Randi and explore various hoaxes and illusions. The program includes a visit to "Öhmanin tavaratalo" (Öhman's department store) for a reveal of major hoaxes, and an evening with James Randi.

The 8th European Skeptics Conference will be held in La Coruna, Spain, from September 4-7, 1997. The theme is "Science, Pathological Science and Pseudoscience." The conference will feature presentations by prominent skeptics and include visits to the science museum and Santiago de Compostela.

Skepsis Organization Information

The issue provides contact details for Skepsis ry, including its board members, scientific advisory board, and information on how to become a member or subscribe to the Skeptikko magazine. The association's purpose, as stated in its statutes, is to promote objective and unbiased scientific investigation of paranormal claims, maintain a network of interested individuals, publish research, and organize educational activities.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around critical thinking, the scientific method, and the importance of clear communication in addressing pseudoscientific claims and paranormal phenomena. The magazine actively engages in debates, provides platforms for diverse viewpoints within the skeptical community, and strives to educate the public while also encouraging constructive feedback to refine its own direction and accessibility. The editorial stance is clearly in favor of evidence-based reasoning and scientific inquiry, while also acknowledging the need for accessible and engaging content to reach a wider audience.