Magazine Summary

Skeptics UFO Newsletter

Magazine Issue Skeptic UFO Newsletter (SUN, Philip Klass) 1970s–1990s

Ever wanted to host your own late-night paranormal radio show?

Across the Airwaves · Narrative Sim · Windows · $2.95

You’re on the air. Callers bring Mothman, Fresno Nightcrawlers, UFO sightings, reptilian autopsies, and whispers about AATIP and Project Blue Book. Every reply shapes how the night goes.

UFO & UAP Cryptids Paranormal Government Secrets Classified Files High Strangeness Strange Creatures
The night is long. The lines are open →

Summary

Overview

This issue of Skeptics UFO Newsletter critically examines several prominent UFO cases. It details how authors Randle and Schmitt are revising their Roswell crash scenario, introducing a new theory involving an outer shell destroyed by lightning. The newsletter also scrutinizes UFO incidents reported near Carp, Canada, questioning the authenticity of video evidence and witness accounts. Furthermore, it delves into the Linda Napolitano abduction case, raising suspicions of a hoax and criticizing the handling of the investigation by major UFO organizations.

Magazine Overview

Title: Skeptics UFO Newsletter
Issue: SUN #20
Date: March 1993
Publisher: Philip J. Klass

This issue of the Skeptics UFO Newsletter critically examines several prominent UFO cases and claims, focusing on debunking or casting doubt on widely publicized incidents and testimonies. The editor, Philip J. Klass, uses a skeptical approach to analyze new developments in UFOlogy.

Randle/Schmitt's Revised Roswell Scenario

The lead article discusses the upcoming book by Kevin Randle and Don Schmitt, authors of "Crash At Roswell." Their new scenario revises the original Roswell crash narrative, claiming it occurred a couple of days after July 2, 1947, and that the UFO crash-landed 40-50 miles south of the Brazel ranch. They propose that the UFO had an outer shell that was destroyed by lightning, with the debris falling on the Brazel ranch, while the inner craft flew further south. The article questions how a lightning strike could demolish a super-strength outer shell, referencing the claims about the foil-like debris being difficult to bend with a sledgehammer. Randle claims to have examined a small piece of alleged crash debris provided by a witness who refuses to allow laboratory analysis, but Randle expresses confidence due to corroboration from other sources, despite the witness's inconsistent behavior.

Friedman, Berliner Disavow Key Witness

This section reports that UFOlogists Stan Friedman and Don Berliner have publicly admitted they "no longer have confidence" in the testimony of Gerald Anderson, their key witness for the Plains of San Agustin crash site. Anderson admitted to falsifying a document, specifically a telephone bill, which undermined his credibility. The article notes that while Friedman and Berliner don't dismiss the possibility of a crash at San Agustin, Anderson's testimony is now considered unreliable. It details how Randle initially interviewed Anderson and was skeptical, but Friedman proceeded despite warnings. Anderson's fabricated telephone bill was an attempt to corroborate his story. Earlier, Anderson had provided Friedman with a diary purportedly from his uncle, but forensic analysis showed the ink was not available in 1947, a fact Friedman allegedly ignored.

Curious Canadian UFO Capers at Carp

The newsletter investigates UFO incidents reported near Carp, Canada. A video tape allegedly showing a UFO landing on August 18, 1991, was featured on TV shows. The video was provided by an anonymous source named "Guardian." Bob Oechsler, a UFOlogist, investigated the incident. The article also mentions an earlier alleged landing in November 1989, reported via an anonymous letter. Leonard Stringfield included the 1989 incident in his report, with an assessment calling it a "very poor hoax." The anonymous letter claimed a conspiracy by security agencies to hide an alien vessel and that implanted aliens were "ZOMBIES" planning to overthrow mankind. While some witnesses reported strange lights and helicopter activity, none reported a UFO landing or military recovery. The article suggests "Guardian" may have staged the 1991 event, possibly with assistance, to create the video. Oechsler's investigation found that the document provided by "Guardian" was counterfeit, a fact he eventually acknowledged. Despite this, he continued his investigation, focusing on establishing dialogue with "Guardian." Jeff Sainio, a photo analysis specialist, described the Carp video as "underwhelming."

"Insider Report" on Linda UFO-Abduction Case

This section critically examines the UFO abduction case of Linda Napolitano, as detailed in a report by Joseph J. Stefula, Richard D. Butler, and George P. Hansen. The report raises suspicions of a hoax and criticizes the inaction of CUFOS and MUFON officials. Revelations include an alleged profit-sharing agreement between Napolitano and Budd Hopkins for his book on the case, which Napolitano later claimed was "deliberately planted disinformation." The report also notes that an investigation of Napolitano's apartment complex found no reports of UFOs or unusual activity on the night of her alleged abduction. Stefula, Butler, and Hansen express concern over the aggressive attempts by Walter Andrus and Jerome Clark to dissuade them from their investigation and their failure to publish critical material on the case.

Travis Walton Case Re-examined

The newsletter revisits the Travis Walton abduction case, noting that Paramount Pictures is releasing a film titled "Fire in the Sky" based on his claims. MUFON is cooperating with Paramount in promoting the film. Travis Walton is also rewriting his book. Philip J. Klass, the editor, reiterates his long-held view that the Walton case is a hoax, citing details from his own book, "UFOs: The Public Deceived." He challenges Walton to a wager regarding his prediction that Klass would retract his claims. Klass highlights specific statements from his book, including Walton's alleged comments to his mother and her calm reaction, and the results of a polygraph test administered to Travis Walton which reportedly showed "Gross Deception." The article also mentions that the film "Fire in the Sky" fictionalizes some aspects, such as reducing the number of woodsmen and creating composite characters, and that the abduction sequences were altered to include elements from other abduction cases, potentially incorporating themes of genetic experimentation not present in Walton's original account.

Short Shrift

This section provides brief updates and notes:

  • An "Alien Invasion Survival Card" is available, featuring a Lost Time Detector and Range Finder.
  • Ed Walters of Gulf Breeze and his wife Frances have divorced. The marriage reportedly ended due to an incident on February 7, 1988, where Ed prioritized photographing a UFO over helping his wife, Frances, who was being targeted by its blue beam.
  • A publication titled "Demons, Doctors and Aliens" by James Pontolillo is recommended, which explores the connection between alien abductions and ancient religious-mythic beliefs, attributing abduction accounts to hypnotic recall and causative traumas.
  • A FLASH note mentions that Budd Hopkins and Linda Napolitano briefed the U.S. Secret Service regarding claims of abduction by "security officers" guarding UN Secretary General Javier Perez de Cuellar.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The Skeptics UFO Newsletter consistently adopts a critical and skeptical stance towards UFO phenomena and claims. The recurring themes in this issue include the debunking of prominent UFO cases like Roswell and the Travis Walton abduction, the questioning of witness testimony and evidence in the Carp incidents, and the exposure of alleged inconsistencies and potential hoaxes in abduction narratives like Linda Napolitano's. The newsletter's editorial stance is to apply scientific scrutiny and critical thinking to UFO claims, often highlighting flaws in evidence, contradictions in testimony, and the role of psychological factors or deliberate deception in UFO reports. The publication aims to counter what it perceives as uncritical acceptance of UFO stories within the ufology community.

Removing public anonymity can only put the focus on his credibility and integrity instead of the incredible event itself...

— Bob Oechsler

Key Incidents

  1. 1947-07-02near Corona, New Mexico

    Alleged crash of a UFO on the Brazel ranch, with debris recovered by Maj. Jesse Marcel.

  2. 1989-11-04Carp, Canada

    Alleged UFO landing incident reported via anonymous letter with accompanying photo of an ET.

  3. 1991-08-18Carp, Canada

    Alleged UFO landing incident captured on video by 'Guardian', showing a saucer-shaped object with strobe light and flares.

  4. 1975-11-05Heber, Ariz.

    Travis Walton claims he was abducted by a UFO and held for five days.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the new scenario proposed by Randle and Schmitt regarding the Roswell crash?

Randle and Schmitt's new scenario suggests the crash did not occur on July 2, 1947, but a couple of days later, and that the UFO flew 40-50 miles south of the Brazel ranch before crash-landing. They speculate the UFO carried an outer shell that was pulverized by lightning, with the debris falling on the Brazel ranch.

Why do Friedman and Berliner no longer have confidence in Gerald Anderson's testimony?

Friedman and Berliner no longer have confidence in Gerald Anderson's testimony because he admitted to falsifying a document, specifically a telephone bill, which was central to corroborating his story about finding a crashed saucer.

What is the main criticism of the Carp UFO landing incident video?

The main criticism of the Carp UFO landing incident video is that it is considered a 'fake' by some UFOlogists, and the alleged classified document accompanying it was found to be counterfeit. The video itself has been described as 'underwhelming' with the ability to replicate most of its effects.

What are the main suspicions raised about the Linda Napolitano abduction case?

Suspicions about the Linda Napolitano abduction case include claims of a profit-sharing agreement between Napolitano and Budd Hopkins, Napolitano admitting to 'deliberately planted disinformation,' and the lack of any UFO reports from residents or security guards at her apartment complex on the night of the alleged abduction.

In This Issue

People Mentioned

  • Philip J. KlassEditor
  • Kevin RandleAuthor
  • Don SchmittAuthor
  • William L. MooreAuthor
  • Charles BerlitzAuthor
  • Mac BrazelRancher
  • Maj. Jesse MarcelArmy Air Force Officer
  • Grady (Barney) BarnettWitness
  • Stan FriedmanUFOlogist
  • Don BerlinerAuthor
  • Gerald AndersonWitness
  • Dennis StacyJournal Editor
  • +8 more

Organisations

  • MUFON
  • CUFOS
  • Hynek Center for UFO Studies
  • INFO (The International Fortean Organization)
  • FUFOR (Fund for UFO Research)
  • Arcturus Books Inc.

Locations

  • Roswell, USA
  • Corona, USA
  • Plains of San Agustin, USA
  • New Mexico, USA
  • Carp, Canada
  • Ottawa, Canada
  • New York City, USA
  • Albuquerque, USA
  • Heber, USA
  • Ariz., USA

Topics & Themes

RoswellUFO CrashAbductionHoaxWitness TestimonyRandleSchmittBrazel ranchdebrisGerald AndersonFriedmanBerlinerCarpUFO landingGuardianLinda NapolitanoBudd HopkinsTravis Walton