SERPAN - No 01 - Juillet 1992

Magazine Overview

This document is the first issue of SERPAN's internal bulletin, titled 'BULLETIN CONFIDENTIEL N°1 DE LA SERPAN', dated July 1992. SERPAN stands for 'Société d'Enquête et de Recherche sur les Phénomènes Aérospatiaux Non-Identifiés' (Society for Investigation and Research on Unidentified Aerospace Phenomena), an association under the French law of July 1, 1901. The organization is based in Sainte-Maxime, France.

Editorial

The editorial, written according to the wishes of the President, introduces this first, modest issue. It acknowledges that the bulletin is disparate and made with limited resources, but it exists. The editor invites those with a 'valiant heart' to contribute to its evolution, encouraging personal input that is daring, informative, open-minded, amusing, and thought-provoking without being overly serious. It also states that if anyone is unsatisfied, they are welcome to take charge of its development, which would be educational for all.

Table of Contents (Sommaire)

• The table of contents lists several articles and sections:
• Small ads
• Two strange RR3
• Jabreilles les Bordes, dossier re-opened
• Search for gendarmerie reports
• Similar cases
• Database "Alleged physical effects of OVNI and OVI"
• Trans-en-Provence
• Corridor rumors from a TV broadcast
• SERPAN budget update
• Results of a member survey
• Press clippings
• Mail

Small Ads (Petites Annonces)

Raoul Robé is seeking contact information for several individuals (Jean Bastide, Jean-Marc Bonay, Jean-Louis Brochard, Michel Carrouges, Jean-Charles Fumoux, Jean-François Gille, Jean Goupil, Marc Naulet, Michel Piccin, Claude Poher, Frédérique Sagnès, Richard Varrault, Jean-Christophe Vève) for contact with SCEAU. He is also looking for observations of humanoids, specifically in the Nord-Est region, and cases dating from 1976, 1977, or 1987. Additionally, he is interested in testimonies about 'Visitors of Chamber to Sleep' who responded 'Yes' to question 15 of the 1991 SCEAU questionnaire. A summary of the first archive deposits and contracts with national and departmental archives is mentioned.

Michel Figuet is selling two books by H. Durrand ('Le livre noir des ovnis' and 'le dossier des ovnis') for 50 French Francs each, and 'Les ovnis du passé' by Ch. Piens for 40 French Francs.

Eric Maillot has acquired two reference books on helicopters: 'Encyclopédie mondiale des hélicoptères civils et militaires' (Edition CELIV) and 'Histoire de l'hélicoptère' by Jean Boulet (Edition France Empire).

Readers are encouraged to send their information and announcements to Gilles Munsch, the secretary, to update the bulletin.

Two Strange RR3 Cases (Deux RR3 Etrangement Similaires)

This section discusses a comparative study of the Menton Gorbio and Abitibi Val d'or cases. Michel Figuet and Eric Maillot have sent their work to ufologists for further information. J. Fergusson, initially contacted, did not respond. The text includes excerpts from letters by Alain Gamard and François Bourbeau regarding this subject.

Jabreilles les Bordes by Eric Maillot

Eric Maillot is compiling a comprehensive dossier on the Jabreilles les Bordes case, chosen for its quality of observation, being a close-range, daytime encounter. He considers the possibility of confusion with a helicopter, especially given the presence of a mining division (COGEMA) exploiting uranium in the area. He details his attempts to gather information from COGEMA, including calls to M. Coste and Mme Bove, who indicated that obtaining information would be time-consuming. He was advised to contact M. Tona, but a telephone response from Mr. Roux indicated no helicopter prospecting was occurring at that time by COGEMA. A written response is still pending. He also plans to contact the BRGM for prospecting data. Additionally, he contacted Mr. Gorce, an investigator for LDLN, who had difficulty recalling the case and had no documents; Mr. Gaille, another contact, has passed away. Efforts are being made to preserve the archives of the deceased ufologist.

Letter from Alain Gamard to Jean Ferguson (Le Vésinet, July 23, 1978)

Alain Gamard writes to Jean Ferguson, mentioning his three-year project of compiling a worldwide database of humanoid observations, currently around 1200 cases. He has also conducted statistical analyses. Gamard is contacting Ferguson after reading his book 'Humanoides, les cerveaux qui dirigent les soucoupes volantes' and believes exchanging information would be fruitful. He includes a list of French and Canadian humanoid observations and asks Ferguson if he has knowledge of cases not on his list, offering to share his summaries and references. He notes a striking similarity between the Vassan case (Summer 1950) and a French case near Lienton (Spring 1954), providing a photocopy of an article from 'Lumières dans la Nuit'. He points out that the French witness, B., is corpulent, a detail not in the report, and refers to page 242 of Ferguson's book. Gamard asks for a physical and psychological portrait of the Canadian witness, Mr. I.B., and any details not included in Ferguson's book. He expresses surprise that Ferguson's book does not detail the 1968 humanoid wave in Quebec and Canada.

Response from Alain Gamard (undated)

Alain Gamard responds to a comparative study of two texts concerning the Gorbio and Vassan cases. He finds the similarities striking and leans towards explanation 1B (paraphrase) based on textual analysis rather than the alleged facts. He highlights specific phrases from both accounts that show remarkable similarity, questioning if these similarities are coincidental. He mentions that he has enclosed a photocopy of a letter he sent to Ferguson in 1978, which received no response. He also notes two French RR3 cases with similar characteristics: Cussac and 'La Montagne des Alouettes', the latter appearing in LDLN No. 200.

Letter from OVNI-ALERTE to Michel Figuet (Drummondville, October 25, 1991)

This letter, marked 'CONFIDENTIEL', is from OVNI-ALERTE to Michel Figuet. The author urges Figuet to focus on the phenomenon itself and its manifestation, noting that waves are the only historically verifiable similarity in ufology, with each case appearing unique. The author expresses strong skepticism about the Canadian humanoid case described by Jean Ferguson, suggesting it is a fabrication. The author states that during a visit to Quebec in 1987, they met Ferguson, who was evasive. The author believes Ferguson, lacking epistemological rigor, invented the Canadian case based on the French one to test other ufologists. The author concludes it is a fraud and advises Figuet to stop pursuing this affair and focus on more promising investigations.

OVNI ALERTE - page 2 (undated)

This section continues the letter from OVNI-ALERTE, stating that the dossier should not be seen as evidence for an extraterrestrial hypothesis. The author thanks Figuet for the document and mentions ongoing work on a ground trace case near Montreal. Collaborators include the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, Laval University, and various meteorological and control centers. The dossier is reportedly comprehensive, proving no known terrestrial phenomenon is responsible for the trace. Direct witnesses observed a sphere of light above the field where the trace appeared. A recent RR2 case with physical evidence in Dollard-des-Ormeaux, Montreal, is also mentioned, involving a burned circle on asphalt and witnessed by women in a park. An investigation is planned with Christian R. Page, using video equipment to document testimonies and witness reactions. The author notes that Figuet is the only French person currently aware of these investigations. The author also mentions a major project involving an official television series on the unusual, with planned reports in France, suggesting they might meet soon.

OVNI-ALERTE - page 3 (undated)

This page provides the new personal address of the author: 21, rue Fabne, Drummondville (Qc) J2B 3C6, Canada, with the phone number (819) 474-6864. The number 474-OVNI is noted as being particularly useful in the current case. The author expresses a strong personal distrust of Jean Ferguson, warning that Ferguson might claim to have invented the case as a test to discredit others, similar to the 'English circles' affair. A 'WARNING' is prominently displayed.

The letter concludes with encouragement for Michel Figuet's work, calling it 'always painstaking' and offering a 'Bravo'. It is signed by François Bourbeau.

Letter from Eric Maillot to Monsieur Bourbeau (November 12, 1991)

Eric Maillot, co-author of the text comparing two RR3 cases and collaborating with Michel Figuet, expresses his opinion. He thanks Bourbeau for his response, which helped understand the coincidence of scenarios in the two cases, finding J. Fergusson's behavior suspicious. Maillot notes that the idea of a copy by J. Fergusson was considered in their conclusion and that other possibilities were explored objectively. He defends the scientific method of seeking similar cases to prove the existence of unknown phenomena. He acknowledges a link between auroras and UFOs, and the moon and UFOs, attributing it to misidentification. Maillot does not believe J. Fergusson intended to trap anyone and states that the 'English circles' affair was not solely created by the two elderly individuals involved. He believes this case will remain mysterious. He expresses pleasure in finding ufologists with solid cases who conduct necessary investigations and wishes them continued success. Maillot also mentions compiling a separate file on foreign cases with physical effects and requests information on developments or conclusions from investigations in Ste Marie de Monnoir and Dollard des Ormeaux, noting that these cases are confidential unless addressed to him personally. He concludes by wishing Bourbeau success with his broadcast.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the investigation of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) and humanoid sightings. There is a strong emphasis on rigorous investigation, evidence analysis, and the scientific method, as exemplified by Eric Maillot's defense of his approach. A significant undercurrent is the skepticism towards certain witnesses and cases, particularly the Canadian humanoid case attributed to Jean Ferguson, which is openly questioned as potentially fraudulent. The bulletin also highlights the collaborative nature of ufological research, with calls for information sharing and contributions from members. The editorial stance appears to be one of cautious investigation, open to new ideas but grounded in critical analysis and a desire to uncover factual information, while also being wary of potential hoaxes and misinterpretations.

This issue of OVNI magazine, published by SERPAN, appears to be a compilation of correspondence and research notes related to ongoing investigations into unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) in France. The primary focus seems to be on the Jabreilles-Les-Bordes incident from July 1970, with significant effort dedicated to exploring a potential helicopter explanation for the sighting and its associated physical traces.

Key Investigations and Correspondences

The magazine features several key pieces of correspondence and research updates:

Mme Darnault's Account Mme Darnault, a close associate of a witness, describes an instructive discussion that was recorded. She learned that Thierry Pinvidic had investigated the case and that the published drawing of the UFO was not made by the witness. She also noted that the witness's communication was sometimes indirect, as if part of a larger communication network.

Thierry Pinvidic's Involvement Thierry Pinvidic confirmed his past intervention with the witness and Mme Darnault. He stated he had obtained negatives from Mme Darnault, which were of poor quality and subsequently disappeared during a break-in. He agreed to transmit his case file, which was promptly received.

Mr. J. Pierre Grangeon's Case After an initial unanswered letter, a phone call was made to Mr. Grangeon to follow up on a request. He confirmed receipt of the call and mentioned that some of his documents (recordings, photos) might be in possession of others. He assured a response with slides and other information, but no response has been received to date.

Bertrand Méheust's Contribution Several attempts to contact Bertrand Méheust were unsuccessful until a television program, "Raison de plus," provided an opportunity to connect. He was expected to transmit his documents, and his opinion was that a misidentification was unlikely.

Follow-up with Mme Darnault Following the interview with Mme Darnault, the author contacted her again by mail for further information. The bulletin notes that the departure direction of the UFO varied over time and that the last response received was brief, suggesting the end of a dialogue, which is common in epistolary verification processes.

EDF Helicopter Investigation The possibility of an EDF (Électricité de France) helicopter being involved was to be investigated. Contacts were to be made with the Groupe des Travaux et Aménagements de L'EDF or the CRTT of Haute Vienne. There was also information about EDF using tracked vehicles for installing lines on steep terrain, which might be relevant to the traces found.

Military Zone and Gendarmerie Reports Mr. Grangeon mentioned a military zone not marked on maps, raising the possibility of a military helicopter. However, questions remained about its presence and the ground traces. The author lamented the lack of direct contact with military personnel for information and noted that obtaining gendarmerie reports would be difficult without a case file number or investigation date.

Provisional Conclusion and Call for Collaboration The author concludes that despite numerous calls and hours spent writing, progress has been slow. Many prefer to label sightings as unexplained "UFOs" rather than investigating potential misidentifications. The magazine calls for any information, suggestions, or collaborations from readers to aid in this counter-investigation.

Jacques Scornaux's Research Jacques Scornaux agreed to conduct documentation research on mining prospection at the Bibliothèque de la Villette.

Request for Gendarmerie Reports A section details the process of obtaining Gendarmerie reports (PVGN) related to "UFOs with physical effects." It highlights that few of these official documents are in ufological dossiers and suggests contacting various public prosecutors. Eric Maillot is to be contacted for a listing of cases.

Similar Cases The case of "Montagne aux Alouettes" is mentioned as being similar to the Cussac case, particularly regarding how entities entered the UFO. This observation was made by many children from a vacation colony. The magazine asks if all efforts were made to find these witnesses and if any members are interested in this research. It also inquires about other known similar cases.

Letter from Eric Maillot to Monsieur Lagarde Eric Maillot, along with Michel Figuet and Gilles Munsch, is compiling and analyzing UFO observations with alleged physical effects. They are seeking information on the Jabreilles-Les-Bordes case from July 25, 1970, asking if Mr. Lagarde possesses a case file, has knowledge of subsequent investigations, has photographs or negatives, or if radioactivity tests were conducted. They also inquire about sample collection and vegetation growth monitoring after previous investigations, and the exact location of the traces.

Letter from Eric Maillot Regarding Aerial Prospection Eric Maillot requests information from Mr. Lagarde about aerial prospection methods and equipment used in 1970 (airplanes or helicopters). He specifically asks if helicopters were used for mining or geological research around La Crouzille in July 1970, who was responsible for this prospection, and the type and base of the aircraft. He also inquires about the division of La Crouzille, its equipment for helicopters, and the location of its heliport. Finally, he asks if the Jabreilles-Les-Bordes area was prospected on the ground or from the air in 1970.

Letter from Eric Maillot to Monsieur (regarding Les Bordes case) Eric Maillot transmits a dossier to Monsieur (presumably Mr. Lagarde) concerning a possible explanation for the 1970 observation at Les Bordes (Hte Vienne), suggesting a distorted description of a helicopter. The witness might have been dazzled by the sun reflecting off the canopy. The presence of the helicopter and the ground traces need further explanation. The hypothesis of a helicopter used for geological or mining prospection is considered, given the proximity to the uranium mining division of La Crouzille and the presence of a geological fault. The letter seeks to verify the presence of a helicopter, identify its type, and explain the origin of the traces, possibly from sondages or landing gear. It requests information on whether any prospection or sondage was planned and documented, and the models and equipment used by prospection helicopters.

Additional Observation and Helicopter Hypothesis Another UFO observation, reported to the gendarmerie in Vins-sur-Caramy (Var) in April 1957, is mentioned, with a small helicopter (type Djinn) suggested as a possible origin. Research into archives revealed that uranium prospection by helicopter occurred in the Southeast of France around that time. The mineralogical map of the area shows an aluminum (bauxite) deposit. The possibility of verifying this explanation is raised.

Database "Alleged Physical Effects of UFOs and UOIs" A database contains 1150 files, with data entry paused for structural description and codification. Plans include updating paper files, performing statistical analyses, and creating a list of consulted works to avoid redundancy. A list of cases potentially being astronomical misidentifications is being outsourced for research on geographical coordinates and ephemerides. Readers are encouraged to submit cases of probable or certain astronomical misidentifications.

CNEGU Exclusion At the last CNEGU session, it was decided to exclude the CNEGU file, covering all types of UFOs from the northeast, from the database.

Trans-en-Provence Case An exposé on the Trans-en-Provence case was requested for the 1992 Lyon Encounters, to be presented by Michel Figuet. A text by Eric Maillot on trace analysis was integrated into this exposé and will be published in the review "La ligne bleue survolée?" with additional content.

Chemical Compound Analysis Jacques Scornaux will research the possible origins of an ionic chemical compound (C2H2O) found in GEPAN analyses. Information might be sought from SEPRA via CNES. The author hopes to obtain a publication on biochemical analyses conducted by Pr. Bounias.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around meticulous, often frustrating, investigation into UAP cases. There is a strong emphasis on gathering documentation, verifying witness testimony, and exploring rational explanations, particularly the helicopter hypothesis. The editorial stance appears to be one of persistent inquiry, acknowledging the difficulties in obtaining official data and scientific recognition, while encouraging collaboration and detailed analysis. The magazine highlights the importance of physical evidence and effects, as discussed by J.J. Vélasco, and the challenges faced by organizations like GEPAN and SEPRA in their research efforts.

This issue of "Le Var nice matin" dated Tuesday, January 21, 1992, under the section "VAR INFORMATIONS," features an article titled "Le mystère de la boule de feu" (The Mystery of the Fireball) concerning an incident in Les Issambres, France. The magazine also includes content related to UFOs, scientific research on biomagnetism, and financial information for an organization called SERPAN.

The Mystery of the Fireball

On January 21, 1992, gendarmes in Les Issambres, France, responded to a report of a "fireball" near the Bougnon pass, in the area known as "les Cabanes." A patrol was dispatched but found nothing abnormal. The gendarmerie also contacted local airfields to determine if any aircraft were reported missing or in distress, which could have explained the phenomenon. In the absence of any material evidence, the case was closed by investigators, who suggested that an accumulation of clouds or a localized meteorological phenomenon might be responsible.

UFOs and Related Discussions

The issue includes discussions and reports related to UFO phenomena, drawing from various sources and interviews. One section details ongoing analysis of the "Belgian Wave" of UFO sightings, with information from the French Air Force (FAB) and discussions about potential NATO defense testing. Léon Brénig is quoted discussing the military's analysis of the Belgian UFO data, including the confirmation of significant accelerations (40G) and the difficulty in countering the observed movements. The role of Mr. Meessen is also mentioned in relation to acceleration data.

Another part of the magazine reports on a significant UFO sighting in Costa Rica, specifically over San José. This event, occurring around midnight, involved unidentified flying objects illuminating the sky for two hours and coincided with power outages in the capital. Police officers described seeing a bright light resembling a large spotlight that caused vehicle and radio equipment to malfunction. Other witnesses reported seeing strange, luminous craft emitting a whistling sound.

The text also touches upon the possibility of secret military testing of NATO defenses as a potential explanation for some UFO events.

Influence of Magnetic Fields on Living Organisms

A significant portion of the magazine is dedicated to the "Influence des champs magnétiques sur le vivant" (Influence of Magnetic Fields on the Living). This section details experiments, primarily by J. and M. Barnothy, on the effects of magnetic fields on mice. Key findings include:

• Weight and Growth: Exposure to magnetic fields, particularly in younger animals, can cause a temporary drop in weight, followed by a return to equilibrium. However, the intensity of the deficit varies considerably and is not always correlated with the strength of the magnetic field.
• Longevity: Mice exposed to intense magnetic fields during their youth exhibit significantly increased longevity and appear younger than control groups, suggesting an improved metabolism.
• Heredity: The magnetic field exposure does not appear to affect the hereditary traits of offspring; their development is normal.
• Cellular Mechanisms: Madeleine Barnothy hypothesizes that magnetic fields might prevent errors in the formation of hydrogen bonds during DNA replication (mitosis), leading to better cellular function and metabolism.
• Tumor Growth: Experiments on tumor growth in the presence of magnetic fields showed a significant rejection rate of grafted tumors (20-80%), suggesting a stimulation of the immune system. However, researchers caution against therapeutic extrapolations until studies on spontaneous tumors are complete.
• Radiation Protection: Studies at the University of Illinois indicated that exposure to magnetic fields could reduce mortality rates from ionizing radiation by 23-30%.

The section also notes that the exact mechanisms of these phenomena are not fully understood and that research in this area is often conducted with discretion.

SERPAN Financial Report and Member Information

The issue includes a financial statement for SERPAN as of May 25, 1992. The checking account shows a credit of 788.00 Francs for memberships and document sales, with a debit of 53.70 Francs for bank charges and VAT, resulting in a balance of 704.98 Francs. The postal account has a credit of 180.00 Francs from 1991 and 313.00 Francs from 1992, totaling 493.00 Francs. The total funds before postal expenses were 1197.98 Francs. Details of postal expenses incurred by EMT for inquiries are also listed.

A list of SERPAN members for 1992 is provided, including names such as Michel Figuet, Henry Julien, Jacques Scornaux, and Eric Maillot (who is also the treasurer). The report notes that Alain Gamard has not yet responded to a written membership proposal.

Other Articles

• "L'électricité à la recherche du pétrole" (Electricity in the Search for Oil): This article discusses a new method for geological prospecting using electrical resistivity measurements, which is presented as faster and less expensive than seismic methods.
• "Un avion qui se gonfle" (An Inflatable Plane): This short piece describes a new type of inflatable delta-wing aircraft that can be transported in a trailer, emphasizing its portability and ease of assembly.
• "UNE DIXIÈME PLANÈTE" (A Tenth Planet): This section explores the ongoing astronomical question of whether a tenth planet exists in our solar system, discussing anomalies in planetary movements and recent calculations suggesting the possibility of such a celestial body.
• "Vouziers L'Ardennais - Le sexagénaire brûlé est décédé" (Vouziers L'Ardennais - The Sexagenarian Burned to Death): A brief report on the death of René Manand, 69, who died from severe burns sustained in an accident, possibly caused by a cigarette.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine appears to cover a range of topics including unexplained phenomena (UFOs, fireballs), scientific research (biomagnetism, geology, astronomy), and practical applications of technology (inflatable planes, oil prospecting). The editorial stance seems to be one of reporting on these subjects with a degree of scientific inquiry, presenting findings from researchers and official bodies while also acknowledging the speculative nature of some topics, particularly UFOs. The inclusion of financial reports for SERPAN suggests an organizational focus or a readership interested in the operational aspects of such groups. The magazine aims to inform its readers about current events, scientific discoveries, and ongoing mysteries.

This issue, dated January-March 1992, focuses on advanced helicopter technology and UFO investigations. The main article details the development and features of the McDonnell Douglas NOTAR (NO Tail Rotor) system, specifically the MD 520N and the upcoming MDX model. The magazine also includes correspondence and reports related to UFO sightings and investigations, including a notable case in Trans-en-Provence and an observation in Martinique.

The MD 520N / 530N NOTAR: The Future Technology of McDonnell Douglas

The article begins by introducing McDonnell Douglas Helicopter Company (MDHC) and their development of the NOTAR system, which started in 1976. The first experimental flight occurred in 1981, followed by six years of flight testing. In 1987, MDHC revealed the NOTAR system and the MD 520N project, the first single-rotor helicopter. The MD 520N prototype first flew in December 1989, and the first production helicopter in June 1991.

MDHC also began developing the MDX in the mid-1980s, an eight-seat helicopter that will also use the NOTAR system. The MDX is planned to be powered by either two Pratt & Whitney PW200A or two Turbomeca TM319-2 engines. It is designed for a maximum takeoff weight of 2450 kg, an empty weight of 1079 kg, a cruise speed of 150 kts (278 km/h), and a range of 648 km. The prototype assembly is being accelerated, with a first flight expected in 1992. The primary goal of the MDX project is to reduce direct operating costs by half compared to comparable conventional helicopters. The advancements made during the development of the MD 520N are expected to facilitate the development of the MDX, a versatile medium-class business helicopter with turbines producing 450 kW (603 hp) each. MDHC has already received over 300 purchase intentions and options, anticipating the production of a thousand units in the first ten years.

Type Approval of the MD 520N

The MD 520N, the first helicopter to fly with the NOTAR system, received type approval from the FAA on September 15, 1991. The first machine sold was delivered to the Phoenix Police Department in Arizona. MDHC has received a significant number of firm orders (around 165) and options (25), with 17 orders reportedly fulfilled by the end of 1991. The MD 520N is described as the first 'monorotor' helicopter, meaning it is conventionally built but does not require a tail rotor for directional control or to counteract the torque effect. MDHC expects the NOTAR system to primarily reduce noise and, more importantly, improve safety. The US Secretary of Transportation, Samuel K. Skinner, recognized the importance of this new technology by personally presenting the type approval certificate to Thomas Gunn, the president of MDHC.

The NOTAR Technology

The NOTAR technology is based on the ingenious exploitation of the Magnus effect, produced by a tube-shaped body, to ensure vertical axis control and compensate for the torque effect. This is achieved by compressed air within the tail boom, which escapes through slots on the right flank. This airflow compensates for approximately 75% of the torque effect. Additionally, the pivoting end flap and the 'Direct Jet' exhaust slots enhance vertical axis directional control. The physicist Magnus demonstrated that a lateral force is exerted on a rotating cylinder subjected to a perpendicular flow. This force also occurs when air is expelled along the cylinder's surface, provided the expulsion is at an acute angle to the free flow. The primary flow then moves along the expiration face at a higher speed than the other face, creating a corresponding lateral force. In the NOTAR system, a fan installed at the rear of the fuselage (Variable Pitch Fan) compresses this air.

Correspondence and Investigations

Letter from Eric Maillot and Gilles Munsch to S.E.P.R.A.

This section contains a letter dated December 4, 1991, from Eric Maillot and Gilles Munsch to Mr. Jean-Jacques Velasco of S.E.P.R.A. They are following up on a previous letter from November 9, 1989, which apparently went unanswered. They acknowledge that S.E.P.R.A. may receive many requests but hope for a favorable response to their inquiry. They refer back to their previous letter for the details of the questions raised and focus on the essential point: an alleged UFO case that occurred in Bertre (83) on September 4, 1989. They enclose a copy of their own investigation report, noting that geographical distance prevented an immediate and in-depth investigation. Their observations, primarily gathered during a visit to the witness on October 26, 1989, are presented. They are particularly interested in the alleged 'physical effects' on the rooftop. They express hope that, after two years, a dispassionate exchange of views on the case, based on established and verifiable facts, can now take place, given that the media and ufological interest has subsided.

Letter from Pierre Kohler to Michel Figuet

This letter, dated April 25, 1984, is from Pierre Kohler, a writer and scientific commentator, to Mr. Michel Figuet. Kohler apologizes for the delay in responding, explaining that he has moved and has numerous activities and travels. He mentions having resigned from his position as an astrophysicist at CNRS in Meudon in December 1980 to pursue scientific journalism. Regarding Figuet's question, Kohler states that a US document provides a list of decaying satellites every two months, published by NASA's Goddard Spaceflight Center based on NORAD observations. This publication is generally for official research organizations, but Kohler receives it and forwards it. He notes that the list does not specify the time or coordinates of the impact point, only the date and catalog number. The publication is also slow, with a two-month delay. He encloses a photocopy of the last page, showing the most recent satellite decay listed as February 27th. Kohler agrees with Figuet that 'Ifology' might be more interesting than 'Ufology' and considers the Trans-en-Provence case to be significant.

Letter from Willy Smith (translated by J.S.X.)

This is a translation of a letter from Willy Smith to Michel, dated sometime after 1990. Smith apologizes for the long silence, explaining he was seriously ill in 1989 and spent most of 1990 recovering. He has finally entered case 650920 into UNICAT and is enclosing a copy of the PROFILE for review, asking for any necessary changes. He is concerned about the witness names, as the system only allows for one or two names and he wants to include the most important ones. He also discovered that he had retained some documents marked 'to be returned' by Michel, which he had inadvertently filed with other case information. He wishes to return them but is unsure of Michel's current address due to the time elapsed. He describes the case as 'excellent' and praises Michel's investigation, recalling that Michel's report was discussed in Jacques Vallée's book 'CONFRONTATIONS'. The UNICAT project now has a complete copy of the Blue Book microfilm files, and Smith has been focusing on these cases, discovering many interesting details he plans to write about later.

Observation Details (from Willy Smith's letter)

This section provides details of an observation, likely related to the UNICAT case:

• FLAVOR: Observation from the submarine JUNON anchored in port; two phases.
• AW: Light halo during stationary flight, then the light disappeared (VN) (19:35 to 21:04).
• CW: Clear night, dark sky - DU: trajectory followed by the light.
• HM: Vertical descent (RA, VD), made two complete loops then stationary flight (HV).
• IW: Numerous, at the naval fort Desaix and at Caravelle (meteorologists).
• RA: Horizontal trajectory to a vertical trajectory.
• RM: Luminous ball, or disk on its edge, fluorescent tube color. Slow and horizontal displacement (MS) from the west - minimum distance: 6 miles (10 km).
• TW: Two small red points below during observation with binoculars.
• VA: Reappearance as if relit (second phase), ascended, made two loops, and disappeared to the west.
• VL: Estimated diameter of 300 feet (90 m); luminous power of 2.3 MW (Vallée) (IL).
• VN: Like a lamp being turned off.
• WA: Bay of Fort-de-France, Martinique.
• REMARKS: Report by Michel Figuet in the UNICAT dossiers. Introduced May 13, 1991.

Michel Figuet Tackles Space Mysteries

This newspaper clipping from 'Le Var Nice-Matin' dated December 30, 1991, discusses Michel Figuet's long-standing interest in unidentified aerospace phenomena (UAP). For twenty years, he has observed such phenomena, including a notable observation in Grimaud in August 1988 of a blue and white luminous bar. An investigation by the gendarmerie and analysis by researchers from CNRA and the USA found perturbations in the pigmentation of wild luzerne where the object was observed. While this doesn't definitively prove an extraterrestrial origin, it warrants further investigation. Figuet has compiled a database of six thousand observation cases, with a particular focus on twelve hundred close encounters involving physical effects.

The article highlights the most interesting case, dated January 8, 1981, in Trans-en-Provence. A worker heard a whistling sound and saw a disk about 2.50 meters in diameter surrounded by a ring land briefly on a construction site before ascending. After the object departed, the witness noticed four reactors or 'feet' at its base and observed traces on the soil. Michel Figuet founded the society SERPAN (Société d'Études et de Recherches sur les Phénomènes Aérospatiaux Non-identifiés) to conduct investigations and research into UAP. The article provides a contact number (42.20.18.19) for reporting UAP sightings, cautioning against mistaking them for shooting stars.

Satellite Decay Information

Page 6 provides a table listing 'DECAYED OBJECTS' from late 1983 and early 1984. It includes international catalog numbers, names (e.g., COSMOS, STS), launch dates, decay dates, and sources (primarily USSR, but also US and PRC). This table appears to be the document Pierre Kohler referred to in his letter, which he received from NASA's Goddard Spaceflight Center.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The issue demonstrates a strong interest in both cutting-edge aerospace technology (helicopters) and the persistent mystery of unidentified aerial phenomena. The editorial stance appears to be one of serious investigation and data collection, as evidenced by the detailed reports, correspondence, and the establishment of organizations like S.E.P.R.A. and SERPAN. There is a clear effort to move beyond mere speculation towards verifiable facts and scientific analysis, while acknowledging the intriguing nature of the subject matter. The inclusion of satellite decay data suggests an interest in the broader context of objects in Earth's orbit and their eventual reentry.

This issue of Var-Matin, dated May 9, 1992, features a prominent section titled "MAXIMOMETRE", which serves as a weekly barometer of local events and trends in the Sainte-Maxime region. The issue also includes a detailed report on a UFO sighting and its subsequent investigation.

MAXIMOMETRE: A Weekly Barometer

The "MAXIMOMETRE" section presents a mixed outlook for the week. Items "A la hausse" (On the Rise) include:

• Armand Carlon: Recognized for his impeccable organization of the 47th anniversary of the armistice ceremonies and for being made a Knight of the Legion of Honor for his services to the administrative agents of the French Navy.
• Comité de Jumelage (Twinning Committee): The twinning between Sainte-Maxime and Neuenburg is progressing well, with German and French schoolchildren strengthening their friendship. Next year will mark the tenth anniversary of their exchanges.

Items "A la baisse" (On the Decline) note:

• Local Works: The ongoing public works (both large and small) in the commune are becoming repetitive and are seen as a negative point.

Notable Personalities and Events

• Michel Figuet: A well-known ufologist and former submariner, Figuet appeared on Antenne 2, discussing his testimonies and analyses of UFOs. He is quoted stating, "Il ne faut pas se faire peur, mais il faut se rendre compte que nous ne sommes pas seuls dans l'univers."
• Municipal Elections: Paul Bausset has alluded to upcoming municipal elections, suggesting knowledge of at least four potential candidate lists.
• Political Opposition: Discussions within the RPR party regarding a potential unified list for the municipal elections are ongoing, with differing opinions between the mayor and Norbert Mathieu.
• Television Appearance: Michel Figuet was scheduled to appear on Claude Carré and Claude Sévilion's television program on April 29th to discuss the theme "Are we alone on Earth?" after the screening of "E.T.".

ENQUETE DANS LA DROME: UN ETRANGE PHENOMENE LUMINEUX - LE CAS DE SAVASSE

This extensive report details an investigation into a luminous phenomenon observed in Savasse, Drôme, on April 11, 1990.

The Observation

• Witness: Jean-Louis Amaudry, a 38-year-old agronomist and horticulturist, with his wife and two children (11-year-old twins).
• Date and Time: Wednesday, April 11, 1990, at 10:45 PM.
• Duration: 6 to 7 minutes.
• Location: Lieu-dit "Le Cros de l'Ane", commune of Savasse (approx. 5 km northeast of Montélimar, Drôme).
• Conditions: Night, clear sky with mistral wind, full moon. The area is agricultural, with a geological feature known as "diluvium alpin". The nearby Cruas-Meysse nuclear power plant is also noted.

The Event

Mr. Amaudry, returning from his fields, noticed an orange light on the communal path opposite his house. Initially suspecting a vehicle, his curiosity grew as the light persisted. He approached cautiously, noting two small red spheres in the air above the light source. The phenomenon intensified, displaying rapid, inverse rotations of the red spheres and emitting orange-red luminous particles in spiral trajectories, resembling Bengal lights. The overall impression was of a stroboscopic effect. The object was described as a vast, seemingly "immaterial" cone trunk, with the wider part pointing towards the ground and the light sources in the upper third. The witness felt a sense of being observed.

Investigation and Analysis

• Initial Contact: E. Maillot of the Magonia group initiated an inquiry, initially considering a misidentification with the moon. However, J.P. Calmel, who provided a report, argued against this, citing terrain and ephemeris calculations.
• Data Discrepancies: E. Maillot found discrepancies between Magonia's data and his own calculations from the Minitel server.
• Witness Testimony: Investigators found Mr. Amaudry to be a credible, balanced, and Cartesian witness. His account remained consistent, and he showed no tendency to embellish the story. He had considered hypotheses such as thieves, vehicle lights, and electrical phenomena before contemplating a UFO.
• Physical Examination: A Geiger counter and magnetic field measurements revealed no anomalies.
• Lack of Trace: No physical traces were found at the scene, and searches yielded no results.
• Public Appeal: A press appeal for witnesses did not yield any further information, particularly from the occupants of a Peugeot 305 seen at the location.
• Conclusion: The investigators concluded that the testimony was authentic and the event disconcerting. While Mr. Amaudry did not claim certainty, he felt he had encountered something that could have been a "probe," leaving him with a sense of unease.

Key Details of the Phenomenon:

• Shape: Cone trunk.
• Color: Orange and red.
• Behavior: Rapid, inverse rotations of red spheres; emission of orange-red particles in spiral trajectories; strobing effect; intensity variations.
• Duration: Approximately 6-7 minutes.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine appears to cover a range of local news, community events, and notable personalities, alongside more unusual phenomena like UFO sightings. The editorial stance seems to be one of reporting and investigating, particularly in the case of the Savasse sighting, where the credibility of the witness and the details of the event are carefully examined. The inclusion of the "MAXIMOMETRE" suggests a regular feature aimed at keeping the local community informed about various aspects of life in the region.

Title: La Tribune Express
Issue Date: April 28, 1990
Cover Headline: Mysterious apparition in Savasse: UFO or physical phenomenon?

This issue of La Tribune Express focuses on a mysterious event reported by the Amaudry family in Savasse, France, on the night of April 11, 1990. The article, accompanied by a sketch of the location and an illustration of the phenomenon, delves into the details of the sighting and explores potential scientific explanations beyond a simple UFO.

The Savasse Phenomenon: A Witness Account

The main article details the experience of M. Amaudry, an arboriculturist from Savasse, who reported seeing a strange light near his home around 10:45 PM on April 11. Initially mistaking it for car headlights, he was struck by its perfectly rectangular shape. As he approached, the light transformed into two brilliant red spheres, approximately 2 meters in diameter, emitting electrical arcs. These spheres then formed a cone-like shape, estimated to be three to four meters high, hovering a few meters above the ground. The phenomenon was observed in complete silence, with no discernible sound or smell, though the presence of mistral wind could have masked faint sensory input. Amaudry described a feeling of panic and quickly retreated to his home.

His wife and two children also witnessed the phenomenon from their window. Mme Amaudry observed the rectangular orange light reappear, and her daughter Nelly reported seeing a faint orange trail in the sky. The total observation time lasted a few minutes. Amaudry emphasizes the lack of any electrical lines in the area, making static electricity an unlikely explanation. He also dismisses the possibility of a helicopter due to the strong wind conditions.

Scientific Analysis and Hypotheses

The article, co-authored by Ph. Olivier and drawing on analysis from organizations like CEIME and Magonia, explores the possibility of the phenomenon being physical rather than extraterrestrial. A key hypothesis presented is that the observed event was the visible manifestation of an electromagnetic field. This theory is supported by the description of electrical arcs and the visual representation of magnetic field lines.

Electromagnetic Field Hypothesis:

• Circuit Analogy: The article draws parallels between the observed phenomenon and the magnetic field produced by an electric current. It discusses linear and circular circuits, illustrating how magnetic field lines (lines of induction) would appear. The visual of the red spheres and arcs is compared to the visualization of these lines.
• Object Characteristics: The object's behavior, including its immobility, the emission of light and electrical arcs, and its apparent artificial nature (described as a cone or polyhedron), is analyzed.
• Electrons and Magnetic Fields: The hypothesis suggests that high-energy electrons, following spiral paths around magnetic field lines, could create the observed visual effects, including the 'stroboscopic' appearance and the perceived 'dilatation' of induction lines. The variability of the magnetic field could explain the fluctuations in light intensity.
• 'Magnetoplane' Theory: The phenomenon's sustentation a few meters above the ground without apparent support leads to the idea of a 'magnetoplane'. This theory posits that the object generates a magnetic field that induces a repulsive current in the ground, counteracting gravity and allowing it to hover. The orange glow observed between the ground and the object could be related to this interaction.
• Lack of Interference: Notably, the phenomenon did not interfere with a television set located about a hundred meters away, nor did it leave any visible traces on the ground, which is considered significant given the proposed electromagnetic interaction with the soil.

Other Considerations:

• Malataverne Sighting: The article references a similar, though distinct, incident in Malataverne on March 14, 1969, where a barrel-shaped object emitted light and paralyzed a witness.
• Witness Corroboration: The Amaudry family hopes for corroboration from other witnesses, particularly a motorist driving a white car (Peugeot 305) who may have been in the vicinity at the time. The CEIME is actively seeking this individual.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently explores anomalous phenomena, presenting witness testimonies alongside scientific analysis and hypotheses. The editorial stance appears to be open-minded, encouraging the investigation of physical explanations for UFO sightings while acknowledging the possibility of unknown phenomena. The article emphasizes the need for further research and corroboration, highlighting the speculative nature of the presented theories but grounding them in observable details and scientific principles. The involvement of specialized organizations like CEIME and Magonia underscores a commitment to rigorous investigation.

Additional Content:

The issue also includes smaller articles and announcements:

• Montélimar: Information about a store closure for renovations.
• Dogs of the Hunt: An announcement for a dog show event.
• Chapitre du tilleul: A note about a potential event in Aulan.
• La foire de Tulette: An advertisement for a fair in Tulette.
• Massif forestier de Marsanne: An article on forestry and ecology.
• Correspondence: A letter from Magonia to Gilles Munsch discussing astronomical calculations and the Savasse case, confirming the observation time as 21:05 UT and the direction as South.

This document comprises several correspondence pieces and analytical notes related to a UFO sighting case in Savasse, France. The primary focus is a debate between researchers Denis Alarcon, J. Pierre Calmel, and Eric Maillot regarding the interpretation of the event, particularly concerning the possibility of lunar misidentification.

Analysis of the Savasse Case

The initial pages (1-2) present an analysis of the Savasse sighting, detailing witness observations of an orange light phenomenon. The authors, Alarcon and Calmel, express skepticism towards Mr. Maillot's conclusion that the phenomenon was lunar. They critique his methodology, stating it is not clearly explained, uses selective information, lacks rigor, and relies on extrapolations rather than raw data. They argue that the phenomenon's characteristics – its stationary duration, movement, structure, shape, and colors (yellow-orange, orange, red-orange) – are inconsistent with a lunar explanation, even considering diffraction or reflection by clouds. They highlight that the light was observed for seven minutes while clouds were moving, and its behavior upon the witness's approach was unusual for moonlight.

Page 2, titled "NOTRE SENTIMENT" (Our Opinion) and "NOTRE CONCLUSION" (Our Conclusion), further elaborates on this critique. Alarcon and Calmel question Mr. Maillot's reasoning, suggesting it contradicts the witness's account and may stem from a personal bias towards lunar explanations. They reference J.A. Hynek's definition of UFO identification, which requires meticulous examination of evidence by qualified individuals. They propose that Mr. Maillot should conduct his own field investigation to gather more solid arguments.

Pages 3 and 4 contain astronomical data, including precise coordinates, times, and lunar parameters for April 11, 1990, likely intended to support or refute the lunar hypothesis. The data includes longitude, latitude, altitude, equinox, and details about the moon's illumination, elongation, parallax, apparent magnitude, and visibility times.

Pages 5 and 6 feature a letter from Eric Maillot to Alarcon and Calmel, dated February 27, 1992. Maillot expresses his surprise at their "surprise" and defends his intention to seek Gilles Munsch's opinion on their calculation errors. He asserts that his approach is based on facts and suggestions, not personal defense. Maillot confirms that the moon was visible during the observation, contrary to what Alarcon and Calmel might have suggested, and criticizes their interpretation of his methodology. He argues that the witness did not explicitly state seeing the moon during the observation and that the enigma remains. Maillot suggests that Alarcon and Calmel's critiques are misplaced and that they should not dismiss his analysis based on his profession as an astronomer. He points to studies by CNEGU and SERPAN that document numerous cases of lunar misidentification, emphasizing that the moon can exhibit various colors (yellow to red) and is rarely white, especially at low altitudes. He states that the phenomenon observed was not a simple 'archetype' of diffraction but a physical event.

Maillot further clarifies that he is not suggesting the moon could not play a role, but that the phenomenon itself was not directly the moon. He mentions that the moon's light could have created effects on a vehicle, leading to misinterpretations. He criticizes the tendency in ufology to dismiss cases that resist analysis and to accept questionable explanations, suggesting that some ufologists might be afraid of rigorous work or potential disappointment.

Pages 7 and 8 contain a response from Gilles Munsch, dated April 3, 1992, to Alarcon and Calmel. Munsch acknowledges their correspondence and the release of "Trait d'Union" issue 25. He shares Alarcon's editorial viewpoint and thanks them for the clarifications on the Savasse case. Munsch notes a perceived "hostility" in their remarks towards Mr. Maillot, recalling that Maillot had previously responded to them. Munsch states that while he and Maillot exchange ideas, they maintain their individual opinions. He clarifies that Maillot does not claim the Savasse case is explicable by a lunar confusion but rather that it is an interesting case deserving attention. Munsch's own experience as an amateur astronomer and ufologist has confirmed the good faith of witnesses, though he acknowledges that even experienced observers can be mistaken, especially concerning the moon.

Munsch agrees with Alarcon and Calmel's critique of Maillot's methodology, particularly regarding the selective use of information and the potential for bias. He reiterates that the moon's appearance can vary significantly in color and that misidentifications are common but complex. He emphasizes that the issue is not about proving the existence of UFOs but about finding cases that resist all analysis, a point also made by Dr. Hynek. Munsch concludes by stating that the problem lies in choosing whether to accept a case as "good" (even if it's a false UFO) which might skew data, or reject a "doubtful" case (a true UFO) which impoverishes the database. He advocates for clarifying one's working hypothesis rather than engaging in disputes.

Pages 8 and 9 contain further reflections from Munsch, emphasizing the value of reciprocal opinion exchange for enriching understanding, provided the goal is not to be right at all costs. He stresses the importance of an open-minded, constructive approach that moves beyond personal convictions and ego. He expresses confidence that their exchanges, initiated in this spirit, can continue fruitfully and passionately, with mutual acceptance of any divergences contributing to their collaboration.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes are the analysis of UFO sightings, the methodology of ufological investigation, the potential for misidentification (particularly with celestial bodies like the moon), and the importance of rigorous, unbiased interpretation of evidence. The editorial stance, as expressed by Alarcon and Calmel, is one of critical inquiry, emphasizing logical analysis, thorough investigation, and a cautious approach to conclusions, while also valuing open dialogue and constructive debate among researchers.