Recherches Ufologiques - No 13 - 1er et 2e trim 1981

Magazine Overview

This document is issue number 13 of the publication "Recherches Ufologiques" by the "GROUPEMENT NORDISTE D'ETUDES" (GNEOVNI). The magazine is published quarterly and focuses on UFO research, particularly concerning phenomena observed in Northern France. The cover features the title, issue number, and a map of the region, along with a stylized globe and a UFO graphic. The publication is in French and has an ISSN of 0180-0159.

Editorial Stance and Content

The editorial, written by Jean-Pierre D'HONDT, the secretary of GNEOVNI, explains that the publication of issue 13 was delayed due to time constraints. He highlights the significant contribution of a 14-page article by René LECONTE, the group's treasurer. LECONTE's article is presented as an open letter to Mr. MONNERIE, author of a controversial book questioning the existence of UFOs. D'HONDT reiterates GNEOVNI's stance, which is that UFOs are likely material craft from extraterrestrial worlds, and they are not satisfied with explanations like 'waking dreams.' The group is committed to the extraterrestrial hypothesis (HET) unless proven otherwise. D'HONDT also mentions that the issue was shortened due to strict postal regulations regarding the weight of publications.

Key Articles and Sections

• Editorial by Jean-Pierre D'HONDT: Discusses the publication delay, the importance of René LECONTE's article, and reaffirms GNEOVNI's commitment to the extraterrestrial hypothesis.
• Les Mots du Président (Words from the President) by Ph. FINET: The president thanks members for re-electing him and reflects on the past year, expressing hope for a strong 1981 for ufology and GNEOVNI. He acknowledges the critical but not hopeless situation of the group, emphasizing the importance of the bulletin's sales and the need for members to adhere to statutes.
• Vos Questions? Nos Réponses: (Your Questions? Our Answers:) This section addresses reader inquiries. One question from J.L DECANIS of Marignane asks how to obtain GNEOVNI auto-collants (stickers). The response explains that they are made artesanally and are primarily for sympathizing merchants who distribute the bulletin. It suggests that DECANIS might find a local merchant to distribute the bulletin in his area.
• Où trouver "Recherches Ufologiques"? (Where to find "Recherches Ufologiques"?): This section provides information on where to purchase the bulletin for those who are not subscribers. It lists "FURET DU NORD" in Lille and other merchants and booksellers in the region who display the GNEOVNI sticker.
• Le Catalogue Régional "1972/73": This is a significant section detailing UFO observations from the Nord and Pas-de-Calais departments. It explains the classification systems used, including the "VALLEE" classification (Type 1-5), the GEPAN classification (A-D), and the HYNEK classification (NL, DD, RV, CE-I, CE-II, CE-III). The catalog then lists specific incidents with dates, locations, classification types, and brief descriptions. Examples include a yellow star-like object in Feignies, a red circular object in Calais, and a cigar-shaped object in Tourcoing.
• Histoire d'une vieille observation... (ou lettre ouverte à Mr MONNERIE) (History of an old observation... (or open letter to Mr MONNERIE)) by R. LECONTE: This is the lengthy article mentioned in the editorial, presenting LECONTE's views on UFOs and his critique of MONNERIE's book.
• Info Groupement: General information about the GNEOVNI.
• Bulletin "Repas du GNEOVNI": Likely a report or mention of a group meeting or event.

Object Characteristics and Themes

The catalog entries describe various object shapes including spherical, discoidal, cylindrical, and cigar-shaped. Colors mentioned are red, yellow, and orange. Behaviors range from rapid movement, acceleration, and turning to stationary positions and erratic flight patterns. Some objects are described as moving at very high speeds. The themes covered include UFO sightings, ufology, regional UFO catalogs, and the extraterrestrial hypothesis.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring theme throughout the issue is the investigation and reporting of UFO phenomena, with a strong emphasis on the extraterrestrial hypothesis as the most plausible explanation. GNEOVNI aims to inform the public and encourage serious study of these events. The publication also highlights the importance of its bulletin as a means of communication and fundraising for the organization. The editorial stance is one of persistent inquiry into the nature of UFOs, favoring a scientific approach grounded in the belief that these phenomena represent advanced technology from other worlds.

This issue, titled "Revue d'Histoire d'une Vieille Observation" (Review of the History of an Old Observation), with the subtitle "Si les OVN I n'existaient pas" (If UFOs Did Not Exist), appears to be a collection of UFO sighting reports and related commentary, likely from a French ufology publication. The primary content spans observations from September 1972 to January 1973, with a significant letter to a Monsieur Monnerie forming a substantial part of the text. The publication is associated with "Archives GNEOVNI" and various "LDLN" issue numbers, suggesting it is part of a series or a compilation.

UFO Sightings (September 1972 - January 1973)

The document meticulously lists several UFO/UAP (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena) sightings, providing dates, locations in France, witness details, and descriptions of the phenomena:

• September 1972, Raismes (59): Several witnesses observed an intense, immobile red glow for 10 minutes, described as elongated with a bulge on top. This sighting is referenced in the book "Et si les ovni n'existaient pas" (page 65).
• September 18, 1972, Louvroil (59): At 1:30 AM, a couple observed an orange glow illuminating a large area, moving towards the West. This is noted as LDLN n° 131.
• October 1972, Vitry en Artois (62): At 0:30 AM, a small green ball descended slowly, then became still and extinguished before a witness's eyes. This is noted as LDLN n° 125.
• October 3, 1973, Crespin (59): A large yellow "star" moved rapidly with saccadic movements for 15 seconds above a witness. This is attributed to Archives GNEOVNI.
• October 25, 1972, Louvroil (59): At 8 AM, an orange luminosity was seen, which transformed into a red sphere and rose, disappearing towards the East. This is noted as LDLN n° 131.
• November 1972, Tournehem (62): A witness was awakened by a whistling sound and observed a non-luminous, apparently metallic triangular object that disappeared behind a terrain elevation. This is attributed to Archives GNEOVNI.
• January 4, 1973, Armentières (59): At 0:15 AM, several witnesses saw a red ball with a trail moving at airplane speed. This is attributed to Archives GNEOVNI.
• January 10, 1973, Quarouble (59): At 1 AM, two witnesses followed the movements of a light source projecting intense beams. The phenomenon was later seen closer to the road, approached the witnesses, and then moved away and disappeared. This is noted as LDNL n° 126.
• February 11, 1973, Lille (59): At 9:50 AM, a witness saw a brilliant cylinder from their window that disappeared, leaving behind vapor flakes. This is attributed to Archives GNEOVNI.
• February 11, 1973, Lille (59): At 9:45 PM, an intense pale blue glow was observed above the city center, with luminous points falling from it. This is attributed to Archives GNEOVNI.
• February 22, 1973, Berlaimont (59): An object shaped like a bowl, topped with three rods and a dome resembling parachutes, was observed at 8 AM. This is noted as LDLN n° 134.
• May 27, 1973, Feignies (59): Four witnesses observed a dark, rounded cylinder with two orange masses moving in a sinuous aerial trajectory towards the Southeast at 2 AM. This is noted as LDLN n° 134.
• July 1973, Somain (59): While driving at 10:30 PM, a witness saw an object in a field as large as three coaches, encircled by very dense white lights. This is noted as LDLN n° 154.
• July 11, 1973, Anzin (59): At 4 PM, a high school student observed three immobile blue spheres, seemingly floating above a bush, which then disappeared abruptly. This is noted as LDLN n° 156.
• July 19, 1973, Equihem (62): Two witnesses observed a red ball moving horizontally above the sea at 10:30 PM, rising and disappearing. This is noted as LDLN n° 133.
• September 3, 1973, Feignies (59): A witness tracked an object shaped like a red cylinder, approximately four meters high and two meters in diameter, near the ground. The witness and another person observed the craft travel 150 meters, ascend above the trees, and disappear. This is noted as LDNL n° 130.

Letter to Monsieur Monnerie: A Personal Observation and Ufological Debate

The bulk of the document consists of a lengthy letter addressed to "Monsieur Monnerie," likely a prominent figure in ufology. The author, an amateur ufologist with 40 years of experience, expresses his intention to share a personal observation made about ten years prior (around 1969) in Lille.

The Author's Observation

The author recounts being unable to sleep on a hot summer night in 1969 in Lille. Around 2 AM, he went into his courtyard. Looking towards the sky, he initially perceived what he thought was a "BIG STAR" or "SHOOTING STAR" moving across the sky at a normal speed. However, he was astonished to see the object, which he describes as "BIGGER THAN VENUS," continue its trajectory, slow down, stabilize, perform a perfect turn, and then resume its course. It then repeated a similar movement in the reverse direction, disappearing towards the West after passing behind the church steeple.

The Search for an Explanation

Despite his curiosity, the author states he was initially hesitant to report this observation due to fear of ridicule and the lack of scientific training. He spent years seeking explanations from various competent individuals, including a radarist family member, astronomers, and members of scientific groups. However, all attempts to identify the object proved unsuccessful, resulting in "COMPLETE FAILURE."

Ruling Out Conventional Explanations

The author systematically rules out numerous conventional explanations for his observation. The object could not have been:

• An airplane (due to lack of engine noise and acrobatic maneuvers).
• A helicopter (less fast and noisier).
• A dirigible balloon.
• An optical effect, atmospheric phenomenon, or a spatial object.
• A sounding balloon, satellite, or their disintegration.
• A meteorite (generally incandescent and not looping).
• A rocket (which would normally explode or follow a predictable trajectory).
• A shooting star (which should fall to its end).
• Ball lightning, lenticular clouds, aurora borealis, or a sun dog.
• Phenomena attributable to mimicry, lasers, holography, or transmigration of objects.
• Mirages, the green ray, or even a non-shooting star, planet, the moon, or the sun.

He emphasizes that none of these known astronomical bodies typically perform such speed and acrobatic feats, especially at night.

The Title of Monnerie's Book and the Ufology Debate

The author then addresses the title of Monsieur Monnerie's recent book, "Si les OVNI n'existaient pas," which he found surprising and which cast doubt on the existence of these "unidentified flying objects." The author strongly disagrees with this doubt, citing his own sighting in 1969 and the decades of serious observations by ufologists and scientists.

He acknowledges that some may dismiss UFOs as hoaxes or comedies, but points out that many learned and sensible people now believe in their existence, leading to the field of "UFOLOGY." He references historical figures like Charles Fort, who wrote about "DAMNED" phenomena, and the progress made by serious ufological groups like GEPAN in France. He criticizes the past dismissal of UFOs by official bodies, contrasting it with later acknowledgments of radar detection.

The author expresses concern that Monnerie's title might lead to a definitive disillusionment or disaffection with ufology, especially given the difficulties and periodic member disaffection within ufological groups. He recounts a personal experience where a scientist friend, after being advised to read serious ufology books, reacted negatively to Monnerie's book, implying that ufology was becoming a "story for fools."

The Nature of UFOs and Other Worlds

The author asserts that the existence of UFOs is a logical necessity unless their phenomena can be scientifically explained, which he argues has not happened. He believes that UFOs belong to a world or dimension beyond our current understanding, which rationalists refuse to acknowledge.

He quotes Albert Einstein, suggesting that Einstein's views on a "fourth dimension" might have led him to believe in extra-terrestrials or UFOs. He also refers to Paul Misraki, who used the term "extra-ordinary" to describe these phenomena.

The Concept of "Myth" in Ufology

A significant portion of the letter is dedicated to refuting the idea that UFOs are simply "myths." The author consults the 1937 Larousse dictionary, which defines "MYTHE" (myth) as a fable or legend from fabulous and heroic times, but crucially also as a "TRADITION WHICH, IN THE FORM OF AN ALLEGORY, REVEALS A GREAT FACT: NATURAL, HISTORICAL, OR PHILOSOPHICAL." He highlights that myths can represent "GREAT FACTS" and "THINGS," and provides examples like "SOLAR FACT" (referring to the sun) and "HISTORICAL SENSE" which implies a "REAL FACT."

He argues that the word "myth" does not solely mean "wind" or something imaginary, but can encompass real, observable phenomena. He concludes that to dismiss UFOs as myths is to misunderstand the definition of the term and to ignore the potential for real, observable events.

A Parallel Universe Hypothesis

Towards the end, the author shares a quote from a letter, possibly from Monnerie or another source, which suggests that UFOs might not come from other planets but from "parallel Universes" that intersect with ours, existing in different dimensions or spaces beyond human imagination, perhaps even the "dimension of the spirit." This hypothesis suggests a continuum between material and subjective realities.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this document are the detailed reporting of unexplained aerial phenomena (UFOs/OVNIs), the personal quest for scientific understanding of these events, and a defense of ufology as a serious field of study against skepticism and dismissal. The author's stance is clearly pro-ufology, advocating for open-mindedness and continued research, while critically engaging with the title of a prominent ufological book that questions the very existence of UFOs. The document emphasizes the importance of witness testimony and the limitations of current scientific knowledge in explaining these occurrences. The debate around the definition of "myth" highlights the author's effort to legitimize the study of UFOs by distinguishing them from mere folklore.

This issue of "L'Écho des OVNI" (The Echo of UFOs), published in 1981, delves into the complex and often controversial intersection of UFO phenomena, scientific inquiry, and theological perspectives. The magazine adopts a stance that strongly advocates for the reality of UFOs and encourages a more open-minded approach from both the scientific and general communities. It challenges conventional scientific paradigms and suggests that a broader understanding of reality, potentially encompassing parapsychology and even spiritual dimensions, is necessary to comprehend these unexplained events.

The Nature of UFOs and Scientific Skepticism

The issue opens by discussing Jacques Vallée's perspective on UFOs, noting that he uses the term 'phenomenon' rather than 'illusion,' implying a material reality. The author contrasts this with the skepticism of renowned astronomers like Karl Sagan, Igor Chelowski, and Pierre Guerin, who, despite acknowledging the possibility of extraterrestrial life, are presented as potentially too dismissive of the UFO phenomenon itself. The text questions whether such scientists, by adhering strictly to current scientific dogma, are ironically falling into a form of 'illusion' or 'delusion' by not considering all possibilities.

Jacques Vallée is further explored, with the author highlighting his book "Le Collège Invisible," which links cultural irrationality, folklore, religion, and legends to the UFO phenomenon. Vallée's provocative statement that a group on Earth is aware of and utilizing UFOs for their own purposes is emphasized.

The article then presents the views of Father Reyna, a physics professor, who, after witnessing multiple UFO sightings, firmly believes in the existence of extraterrestrial vehicles piloted by occupants. Similarly, Dr. J.J. Kalinowsky, Louis Breguet, and René Clostermann are cited as individuals who believe in these celestial objects, even noting that the United Nations addressed the UFO problem in meetings in 1977 and 1978. The issue references Dr. James Mac Donald's declaration to the UN that the UFO problem was the most significant scientific issue of modern times.

The author criticizes the idea of dismissing thousands of witnesses, including observatory directors and technical service directors, as delusional. The text recounts an incident in Tananarive in August 1959 where a cigar-shaped flying object caused panic, leading to questions about the sanity of those who witnessed it.

Hypotheses and the Limits of Science

The magazine acknowledges the numerous and often contradictory hypotheses proposed by scientists to explain UFO manifestations. It suggests that for those not already interested in ufology, these explanations can seem like "stories for fools." The author draws a parallel with the work of Charles Fort, who, despite his unconventional approach, documented numerous unexplained phenomena. The need to explore all scientific disciplines, from astronomy to parapsychology and esotericism, is stressed. The possibility of other universes and higher spiritual dimensions is raised as a potential framework for understanding these events.

Camille Flammarion is mentioned for his work on invisible worlds and his search for explanations for unknown phenomena. The concept of parapsychology is presented as a new science that could contribute to ufology.

A quote from Wilfried Chettexqui, a Doctor of the University of Paris, is featured, stating that "Miracle has no place in nature" and that unexplained phenomena might be due to a "paranormal contribution from a plane whose laws are unknown to us."

The Enigma of Life and the Universe

The issue delves into the fundamental enigma of life and human existence, questioning the origins of humanity and the forces that shape our destiny. It suggests that the answers might lie beyond our current understanding of the physical world, in an "other side of the barrier."

The author expresses a belief that ufological studies, even if not immediately successful, may one day help elucidate these mysteries. While acknowledging scientific progress, the text points out the limitations of science in predicting natural disasters like earthquakes, suggesting that there are still profound unknowns.

The concept of a "superior world" guiding us is presented, with a reference to Camille Flammarion's exploration of the afterlife and mysterious facts. The author also mentions Pierre Pasolini, who, despite not being an astronomer or ufologist, believed in multiple human and superhuman realities.

The Role of Religion and the Vatican

The magazine explores the evolving stance of the Church on UFOs and related phenomena. It notes a recent colloquium of the World Alliance of Religions where a scientific secretary of an international metaphysical institute recalled Pope Paul VI's regret over the intellectual laziness of some Catholic scientists who failed to coordinate scientific research with faith. The issue highlights that science and faith are not irreconcilable, citing historical figures like Thomas Aquinas and Nicolas de Cuse who did not deny the possibility of multiple inhabited worlds.

It is reported that the Vatican believes in UFOs, a statement attributed to Jean Claude Bourret. The article quotes "L'Osservatore Romano," the Vatican's press office, suggesting that humanity must prepare to encounter "men from other worlds." This encounter is conditioned on humanity's progress in love, justice, and charity, rather than fear. The Vatican's desire to explore space is seen as a way to prove the compatibility of science and faith.

The issue concludes that the Church is evolving, and that theologians are increasingly interested in the scientific aspects of creation, the origin of life, and the plurality of inhabited worlds. The potential for new explanations regarding the origin of man and his evolution, moving beyond traditional biblical narratives, is suggested.

UFOs and the Future

The magazine touches upon the idea that the current era is one of discovery, where scientists should not fear the truth. A quote from Francis Bacon emphasizes the need for the spirit to expand to embrace mysteries rather than reducing mysteries to the limitations of the spirit.

The issue mentions a recent report by astronomer Pierre Guerin regarding the "Valensole affair," which criticized those who denied the evidence of UFOs, asserting that ufology is not a "story for fools."

Group Activities and Information

The latter part of the magazine focuses on the activities of the GNEOVNI (Groupement d'Études des Phénomènes Spatio-Temporals Inexpliqués), a UFO research group. It details recent meetings, including an exposition by Monsieur Leconte and discussions on his UFO observation. The return of Mr. Serge Vasseur to the group is noted, along with upcoming events such as a presentation of UFO books and a friendly meal.

The GNEOVNI is also actively seeking conference speakers and offering to help establish new UFO sections in local areas. The magazine poses a question about the new political climate and its potential impact on the study of unexplained sciences, awaiting the response from the director of GEPAN (Groupe d'Études et de Recherches sur les Phénomènes Aérospatiaux Non identifiés).

Finally, the issue includes information on upcoming UFO conferences and events, such as the "Salon de l'Insolite" in Lille, and encourages readers to participate and contribute to the field of ufology. It also includes contact information for various UFO research groups and individuals.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the reality and significance of UFO phenomena, the limitations and evolving nature of scientific understanding, the potential for integrating faith and science, and the human quest for knowledge about the unknown. The editorial stance is clearly pro-ufology, advocating for open-mindedness, rigorous investigation, and a willingness to challenge established beliefs. The magazine positions itself as a platform for disseminating information and fostering discussion on these complex topics, encouraging readers to engage with the mysteries of the universe.

Title: Le Monde Inconnu
Issue: 126
Volume: 12
Date: September 1981
Publisher: Les Editions du Labyrinthe
Country: France
Price: 18 FF
ISSN: 0399-1954

This issue of Le Monde Inconnu focuses on the operational dynamics and perceived collaborations between the official French ufological group, GEPAN, and various private ufological organizations. The editorial section directly addresses and refutes rumors circulating within ufological circles that suggest a one-sided relationship where GEPAN merely collects data without providing adequate feedback or analysis to the private groups.

GEPAN and Private Group Collaboration

The main article defends GEPAN against accusations of a "one-way service." It emphasizes that GEPAN is a relatively new entity in the field of ufology and requires time to mature. The editorial highlights the significant workload and the multidisciplinary expertise required to collect, classify, analyze, and document UFO-related data into "Notes Techniques." It argues that GEPAN's staff of fewer than fifty individuals is tasked with covering all scientific disciplines, a feat that is presented as exceptionally challenging. The article asserts that no other private group in France is currently capable of undertaking such comprehensive work.

Furthermore, the magazine criticizes certain publishers for producing colorful, advertising-heavy weeklies, contrasting this with GEPAN's more academic approach. GEPAN publishes its "Notes Techniques," which are detailed summaries of completed scientific work, including the origin of the research, its methodology, and conclusions. These notes are periodically sent to the magazine's group and are available for public viewing at their library, free of charge. The article suggests that other serious ufological groups can also attest to the reality of exchanges with GEPAN.

GNEOVNI Meeting and Dinner

In addition to the discussion about GEPAN, the magazine announces a meeting for the group GNEOVNI. This gathering is scheduled to take place on September 27, 1981, at 1:15 PM in Merville. A map is provided to guide attendees, showing routes from Dunkerque, Hazebrouck, Lille, Armentières, Estaires, and Béthune towards Merville.

A "Bulletin de Réservation pour le Repas du GNEOVNI" (Reservation Bulletin for the GNEOVNI Meal) is included. This bulletin is to be completed and sent with a payment of 50 French Francs per person to the Hotel Restaurant ANGELIKA in Merville. The payment should be made out to "G.N.E.O.V.N.I." The bulletin requires the reservation of a specific number of covers and the name of the group or association making the reservation. It also specifies that the payment can be made by check or postal money order, and that the signature of the sender must be on the back of the bulletin.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the organization and dissemination of ufological research in France. The editorial stance is clearly supportive of GEPAN, advocating for patience and understanding of its operational challenges. It champions GEPAN's scientific approach and its role in consolidating and analyzing ufological data. The magazine also promotes community engagement within ufology, as evidenced by the announcement of the GNEOVNI meeting and dinner, encouraging participation and interaction among researchers and enthusiasts.