AI Magazine Summary

SBEDV - No 080 - 1971

Summary & Cover SBEDV

Ever wanted to host your own late-night paranormal radio show?

Across the Airwaves · Narrative Sim · Windows · $2.95

You’re on the air. Callers bring Mothman, Fresno Nightcrawlers, UFO sightings, reptilian autopsies, and whispers about AATIP and Project Blue Book. Every reply shapes how the night goes.

UFO & UAP Cryptids Paranormal Government Secrets Classified Files High Strangeness Strange Creatures
The night is long. The lines are open →

20,263

issue summaries

Free. Always.

Support the Archive

Building and maintaining this collection is something I genuinely enjoy. If you’ve found it useful and want to say thanks, a small contribution keeps me motivated to keep expanding it. Thank you for your kindness 💚

Donate with PayPal

AI-Generated Summary

Overview

This issue of 'Neue Zürcher Zeitung' from February 18, 1971, under the 'FORSCHUNG' (Research) section, explores the potential for 1971 to be an 'earthquake year' by examining the relationship between fluctuations in the Earth's axis and seismic activity. The cover features a…

Magazine Overview

This issue of 'Neue Zürcher Zeitung' from February 18, 1971, under the 'FORSCHUNG' (Research) section, explores the potential for 1971 to be an 'earthquake year' by examining the relationship between fluctuations in the Earth's axis and seismic activity. The cover features a graphic illustrating this concept, alongside smaller images related to science and politics. The magazine also includes articles from 'Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung' on 'Natur und Wissenschaft' (Nature and Science), showcasing microscopic images of nerve endings, the effect of magnetic fields on plant growth, and other scientific findings.

Earthquakes and Earth's Axis

One of the lead articles, likely from 'Neue Zürcher Zeitung', titled 'Erdbebenjahr 1971?' (Earthquake Year 1971?), investigates a potential connection between the oscillations of the Earth's axis and earthquake activity. The accompanying graphic shows fluctuations that might indicate a cyclical pattern, with historical data suggesting a possible link to earlier seismic events.

Scientific Discoveries

Several scientific articles are presented:

  • Figure 1: Relates oscillations of the Earth's axis to earthquake activity, referencing 'Neue Zürcher Ztg.' from 18/2/71.
  • Figure 2: An allegorical drawing illustrating the detrimental effects of political interference and human indifference on the UFO problem.
  • Figure 3: Visualizes recoil electrons from X-rays in a Wilson chamber and a photomontage related to epithelial cells.
  • Figure 4: Presents a scanning electron microscope image of nerve endings from a sea slug, as reported by 'Frankf. Ztg.' on 25/3/70.
  • Figure 5: Demonstrates the effect of a magnetic field on mustard root and oat seedlings after 90 and 180 minutes, referencing 'Neue Zürcher Ztg.' from 10/12/70.
  • Figure 6: Features Major Hans Petersen, a Danish collaborator of George Adamski, who propagated Adamski's ideas. Petersen co-edited the English-language magazine 'UFO CONTACT' for two years.

Society News and Obituaries

Section 2, 'NOTÍCIAS DA SOCIEDADE' (Society News), announces an Extraordinary General Assembly for May 8, 1971, and lists the board members for the 1971/72 biennium. It also includes an obituary for Dr. José Augusto da Costa Junior, the first president of SBEDV (Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos Sobre Discos Voadores), highlighting his courage and dedication in establishing the organization during a time when UFO research was controversial.

The article 'DISCOS VOADORES COMUNICAÇÃO E CENSURA' (Flying Saucers Communication and Censorship) by Hulvio Brant Aleixo, founder and president of CICOANI, discusses the challenges in studying UFOs due to their unpredictability and the reliance on casual observers. It notes that scientific study is difficult, focusing more on interpreting verbal reports than physical measurements. The article also touches upon the communication process in UFO research, involving the observer, the researcher, and the public, and the importance of feedback.

Barriers to Communication

The issue delves into the 'BARREIRAS À COMUNICAÇÃO' (Barriers to Communication) in UFO research, identifying three levels:

1. Self-censorship by observers: Individuals fear social sanction and ridicule, leading them to share experiences only with close associates, thus blocking valuable data from researchers.
2. Official censorship: Governments and scientific organizations maintain silence or impose it, reinforcing the 'curtain of silence' established by observers. The article questions why governments, with their national security resources, are not more aware of the extraterrestrial origin of UFOs.
3. Censorship by 'Uranids' (extraterrestrials): The article suggests that extraterrestrials may deliberately maintain an atmosphere of fantasy around their presence to facilitate their plans.

The section 'CENSURA ABSOLUTA OU NENHUMA CENSURA?' (Absolute Censorship or No Censorship?) discusses the gradual increase in public acceptance of UFOs due to repeated reports. However, it warns that society may be psychologically unprepared for a massive, defined approach by UFO occupants, drawing a parallel to the disintegration of indigenous cultures upon European colonization. It also argues for a degree of provisional censorship based on prudence and opportunity to distinguish reality from fantasy, cautioning against both excessive alarm and the suppression of potentially threatening aspects that could lead to panic if a hypothetical threat materializes.

UFO Incidents and Reports

A notable report details a Danish policeman's encounter with a mysterious blue-white light from a UFO that caused his patrol car's engine to stall and its lights to flicker. The incident occurred near Haderslev, Denmark, and the policeman attempted to photograph the object.

International UFO Publications

Several excerpts from international UFO publications are included:

  • UFO CONTACT (April 1967): Features a letter from Ronald Caswell to Cardinal Amleto Cicognani of the Vatican, inquiring about a supposed audience between Pope John XXIII and George Adamski, and Adamski's alleged delivery of a message from extraterrestrials. The Vatican's response indicates that the information cannot be provided.
  • FLYING SAUCER REVIEW (July/August 1970): Includes an article by Charles Harvard Gibbs-Smith, a historian of aviation, discussing the 'Condon Report'. Gibbs-Smith criticizes the report's moral integrity, citing a memorandum by Mr. Low that allegedly planned to mask the study's objectivity by focusing on psychological aspects of witnesses rather than the physical phenomenon of UFOs. The article suggests this memorandum deliberately compromised the project from its inception.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The issue consistently highlights the challenges and controversies surrounding UFO research, emphasizing the need for objective investigation while acknowledging the significant barriers of censorship and public skepticism. The editorial stance appears to advocate for a more open and scientific approach to understanding the UFO phenomenon, while also recognizing the complexities and potential risks involved. The recurring theme is the struggle to gain credibility and overcome obstacles in a field often dismissed or suppressed by mainstream science and authorities. The publication itself, through its detailed articles and references to international research, positions itself as a platform for serious inquiry into these subjects.

This issue of CIPEX e GENA from 2004, spanning pages 218-224, is a collection of articles, letters, and discussions primarily focused on UFO phenomena, scientific integrity, and related societal issues. The publication appears to be from Brazil, given the Portuguese language and the mention of Brazilian research societies.

Article 1: Criticism of the 'Condon Project' and Scientific Integrity

The first section, likely an editorial or commentary, strongly criticizes the 'Condon Project' and the perceived lack of scientific integrity surrounding it. The author argues that the integrity of a scientist is sacred and that the failure of the American Academy of Sciences, the University of Colorado, and the Air Force to repudiate a compromising memorandum from 'Low' is deplorable. The University of Colorado is characterized as a 'small college' for not canceling the project and returning funds. The core argument is not about UFOs themselves, but about the ethical standards of scientific investigation.

Article 2: Letter to Dr. James E. McDonald

A significant portion of the magazine is dedicated to a letter addressed to Dr. James E. McDonald, dated December 1968, from UFO CONTACT. The letter questions Dr. McDonald's rapid shift in perspective on the extraterrestrial hypothesis for UFOs. It notes that in January 1968, he considered it the 'most probable' explanation, a stark contrast to his statement in April 1967, where he found it 'unsatisfactory.' The letter probes whether he had acquired sufficient new evidence to justify this change in such a short period, suggesting that experienced researchers might have moved beyond mere flyovers.

The letter also contrasts the approach of scientists with preconceived notions against more experienced researchers. It implies that some scientists are unwilling to consider landings and contacts, while others might have already moved past that stage.

Article 3: The Legacy of Adamski and Other Researchers

This section discusses the contributions of George Adamski, whose books brought news of UFO visits to the public. The author suggests that Adamski's work, despite initial scientific repudiation, may have contributed to a less panicked public reaction to the truth about UFOs when it eventually emerges. The text also references Major Keyhoe of NICAP and the Canadian investigator Wilbert B. Smith, highlighting Smith's role as a consultant for NICAP. The work of French researcher Aimé Michel is also mentioned, along with his book 'A Verdade Sobre Discos Voadores,' which discusses the 'Project MAGNET' led by Wilbert Smith in Canada.

Wilbert Smith's conclusions are presented, including the belief in abundant life in the cosmos, alien visitation and cohabitation on Earth, past colonization of Earth by extraterrestrials, a philosophy of non-intervention, the benevolent nature of these beings, their advanced technology based on electromagnetism, and their long lifespans. These conclusions are noted as being identical to those previously reached by George Adamski.

The letter further states that every nation has been informed of the existence of UFOs and their occupants, and that nations are responsible for their official stance. It asserts that further efforts to conceal this information are futile.

The authors of the letter express their desire to be considered sincere individuals pursuing their ideals, rather than sensationalists. They emphasize that their understanding is based on open eyes and that their remembrance of Adamski is not based on convenience but on evidence of his sincerity.

Article 4: General Discussion of Two Citations

This section analyzes two articles: one from FSR (July/August 1970) by Charles Harvard Gibbs-Smith and the open letter from UFO CONTACT (December 1968) to Professor James E. McDonald. It frames the discussion as an ideological conflict between two approaches to studying Extraterrestrials: one based on morality, conscience, or heart ('UNUM BONUM VERUM'), and the other on material or political considerations. The author notes the current world's predominance of material values and the potential dangers of this, including atomic warfare, pollution, and economic conflicts.

Terrestrial and Cosmic Security as Superproblems of Superpowers

The article discusses how advanced UFOs have approached Earth, causing concern for superpowers. It suggests that their criticisms, though discreet, relate to humanity's belligerent and immediate attitudes. The existence of UFOs is allegedly kept secret ('supersegredo') to prevent governments from being influenced by 'subversive theories' stemming from alien visits.

A case is cited of a 'Maltese Cross' shaped UFO with colored lights observed near Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, almost 12 years prior. Witnesses reported the object expelling jets of light. However, the current director of the Valongo Observatory, Dr. Luiz Eduardo da Silva Machado, who was a witness, reportedly stated 10 years later that he did not believe in UFOs.

Hooded Scientists

An article from 'O Globo' (12/9/68) is mentioned, stating that the US and Russia are imposing a 'curtain of secrecy' on UFOs. Another from 'Jornal do Brasil' (15/3/69) suggests that politics interferes with UFO research. The text expresses disbelief that an 'expert' would admit to not speaking openly about UFOs for 20 years and confusing them with swamp gas. The article credits George Adamski with breaking the silence of these 'hooded experts' when he published his first volume in 1952, ending a period of secrecy that began after Kenneth Arnold's 1947 sighting.

Fernando Cleto Nunes Pereira's book 'A Bíblia e os DV' is cited, mentioning that specialists advise foreign executive powers, implying that important and unpublished material is sent abroad, where the UFO problem is not taken seriously.

Article 5: Science and Conscience

This section critiques an article from the APRO Bulletin (Jan/Feb 1971) titled 'Brazilian Consulate Publishes UFO News,' which allegedly stated that Brazilian newspapers could publish thousands of UFO news items while the US could not. The author contrasts this with a report in 'Correio da Manhã' (8/3/71) about the tripling of jobs in developed countries, particularly in engineering, suggesting a deviation from vocational calling due to propaganda. Former US Secretary of State Sr. Udall is quoted as accusing the National Academy of Science members of being 'puppets of the government.' An article in 'Time Magazine' (28/2/69) warned of humanity's existence being threatened by the misuse of technology and science.

Dr. Robert F. Creegan, a philosophy professor, is quoted from the APRO Bulletin (Dec. 1970) stating that to guarantee scientific integrity and civil liberties, investigations into UFOs must continue and be open. The article also references an excellent piece by Professor Hulvio Brant Aleixo on the same topic.

What is Truth?

Drawing a parallel to Pilate's decision regarding Jesus Christ, the author criticizes scientists who withhold the truth about UFOs for material or social gain, comparing their actions to Pilate's 'cowardly attitude.' The article questions whether scientists are pressured to emit 'truths' about UFOs and poses three questions:

1. Is there justification for the secrecy surrounding the UFO problem?
2. What will be the conclusion regarding the advantage or disadvantage of this secrecy, given that future generations will inevitably judge it?
3. Can scientists today justify their 20-year 'psychological war' against UFOs?

The principle 'UNUM BONUM VERUM' (one good truth) is invoked, suggesting that anything not aligned with truth is dangerous. The issue of pollution caused by unscrupulous scientists is raised, threatening to turn Earth into an inferno for future generations. The text mentions the difficult experience of atomic scientist Roberto Oppenheimer when he hesitated to build the H-bomb, feeling guilty for the deaths in Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

In contrast, the story of Elsiárd Bouffier, a shepherd who planted oak seeds and transformed a desert valley, is presented as an example of conscience-driven action.

Another Facet of the UFO Problem

While generally against publishing prophecies, the authors make an exception due to current political and geophysical issues. The political aspect concerns escalating international tensions, and the geophysical aspect notes a 400% increase in earthquakes between 1950 and 1958, particularly in the last decade. This is linked to minor oscillations of the Earth's axis and is presented as justification for a circular published on 4/4/71 by Danish ufologist Major Hans Petersen, which, along with the Fatima message, refers to a difficult and imminent cosmic era for Earth.

Crossroads

The article concludes by stating that Brazil, a young nation, has shown discernment in resolving fundamental issues like petroleum, peaceful use of the atom, Amazonian territory, and maritime platforms. It suggests that the UFO issue might also be approached with similar depth and long-term solutions, rather than easy, short-term fixes.

Commentary on Bulletin No. 74/79 and Physiological Effects of UFO-Emitted Rays

This section reviews Bulletin No. 74/79, specifically addressing the case of Almiro Martins de Freitas, who was allegedly struck by a UFO ray. The author speculates whether the blinding and paralyzing light was caused by 'electromagnetic waves' affecting the visual and motor cortex, leading to muscle rigidity. The text suggests that future experiments with magnetic fields might yield insights into nerve physiology, referencing research on brain nerve contacts and the role of ions like chlorine and sodium in nerve activity. The possibility of electromagnetic waves interrupting or blocking nerve impulses is raised.

Experiments with magnetic fields influencing plant roots are described, suggesting a potential analogy to the effect on nerve endings. The research indicates that magnetism might become as important as X-rays in medicine and biology. The article notes that magnetic action caused root movement in plants, raising the question of whether similar influence could affect nerve endings.

Dangers of Microwave Ovens

The text warns about the dangers of microwave ovens, citing a publication in Frankfurter Ztg. (3/2/71). It states that these ovens, operating on radar waves, could potentially cause severe damage to the central nervous system, lower systemic blood pressure, and reduce olfactory sensitivity.

Comparison with Radioactivity

Gamma rays from radioactivity are contrasted with magnetism, noting that radioactivity does not allow for instant recovery and its deleterious effects manifest days or weeks later. The article cites statistics on leukemia cases following the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, indicating a significantly higher incidence among survivors compared to the general population.

It is noted that leukemia caused by radiation is typically chronic, but a ufologist reported a case of leukemia acquired shortly after being struck by a UFO-emitted ray.

Discussion and Afterthought About Articles of Two UFO Magazines

This section discusses two articles, one from 'FLYING SAUCER REVIEW' and another from 'UFO CONTACT.' It posits that there are two fundamental approaches to ufology: a 'practical-political and economical-minded' view versus one guided by conscience and heart ('UNUM BONUM VERUM'). The author references Pilate's dilemma and a 'Time Magazine' article ('Who shares the guilt?') concerning the My Lai killings and Nuremberg hangings, suggesting that ufology should also invigorate its leadership.

A government-appointed UFO expert is quoted as admitting to 'Science' magazine that he had not dared to speak openly about UFOs for 20 years, leading to confusion with swamp gas. The author advocates for a shift from hostility towards UFO crews to a focus on moral principles over material gain.

More Thoughts About the Physiological Effects of Paralyzing Flying Saucer Rays

This section revisits the physical influence of magnetic fields, drawing an analogy between their effect on plant roots and potential effects on nerve endings. It suggests that magnetic fields could interrupt nerve impulses or block posture. The case of Ignacio de Souza is mentioned, with a note that his real name is unknown and that Brazilian research personnel have not investigated the case thoroughly.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the critical examination of scientific institutions and their integrity, particularly in relation to UFO research. There's a strong emphasis on the importance of conscience and truth ('UNUM BONUM VERUM') over material interests and political expediency. The issue highlights the perceived secrecy and censorship surrounding UFO phenomena by governments and potentially by the UFO occupants themselves. The potential dangers of unchecked technological advancement and the need for ethical scientific conduct are recurrent concerns. The publication also champions the work of independent researchers like Adamski and Smith, contrasting their open approach with the alleged reticence of established scientific bodies. The editorial stance appears to be one of advocating for open investigation, ethical scientific practice, and a belief in the reality of UFOs and potential extraterrestrial contact, while critically analyzing the societal and scientific responses to these phenomena.