Revista Alpha Especial - No 02

Magazine Overview

Title: Revista ALPHA
Issue: Edição Especial nº 02
Volume: Ano 1
Date: 2016

This special edition of Revista ALPHA, the second of its kind, prominently features the work of ufologist Nelson Pescara. The cover art depicts an alien landscape under a red sun, with the main headline "Nômades do Sistema Solar" and a subtitle "Uma nova teoria sobre a presença alienígena entre nós" (A new theory about the alien presence among us).

Editor's Note

Rafael da Silva Pereira, Editor of Revista ALPHA, introduces this special edition, highlighting Nelson Pescara's article "Nômades do Sistema Solar – Uma nova teoria sobre a presença alienígena entre nós." He describes it as the culmination of a serious and dedicated study to understand the silent alien presence on Earth. Pescara's ideas are presented as objective and pragmatic, adhering to the principle of Lex Parsimoniae. The editor emphasizes that Pescara seeks answers consistent with facts, not fantasies. The article delves into fundamental questions about aliens, such as "Who are they?", "Where do they come from?", and "What do they want?" However, the editor warns that Pescara's theory is not positive; instead, he suggests that alien activity is aggressive and may involve humanity in a sinister task with an unknown, potentially negative outcome. The editor invites readers to immerse themselves in the text.

Article: Nômades do Sistema Solar – Uma Nova Teoria Sobre a Presença Alienígena Entre Nós

Nelson Pescara, a consultant for Revista ALPHA, presents his theory on alien presence. He states that his life's work in ufology has been more about meditation and reasoning than speaking, and he finds the theme of alien visitation to be the greatest challenge and wonder for human intelligence. Pescara asserts that aliens are indeed here, whether extraterrestrial, intraterrestrial, or dimensional. He intends to detail his viewpoint, which slightly differs from the general idea.

Pescara reflects on the state of ufology since the 1952 reportage in "O Cruzeiro" magazine about a flying saucer in Barra da Tijuca, Brazil. He questions whether, after sixty to seventy years of research since the 1940s, ufology has progressed. He acknowledges the dedicated work of many researchers but notes that the field seems to have stagnated in some ways, yet also argues that ufology is no longer a fringe topic but a daily subject of discussion worldwide, except for a small group of detractors.

Pescara poses several critical questions about alien phenomena:

• Why do these beings appear and disappear seemingly at will?
• How can they manifest in our environment without our full awareness?
• How can they interact with us on air, land, and sea, maintaining control, when we consider ourselves the dominant species?
• How do they defy the laws of physics?
• Why do they monitor catastrophic events like volcanoes and tsunamis?
• Why do they monitor our wars and military conflicts?
• Why do they accompany our aircraft?
• Why did they conduct suspicious activities in our farmlands between the 1950s and 1970s, visiting cultivated lands globally?

He concludes that there are no satisfactory answers to these and thousands of other questions, urging serious consideration and common sense.

Pescara then discusses his personal encounter with the phenomenon, starting in childhood with comic books and early films. He contrasts the romanticized image of aliens from fiction with the reality of the phenomenon. He notes that the modern era of flying saucers, often attributed to Kenneth Arnold in 1947, is a misnomer, as the phenomenon is ancient. He also debunks the idea that "flying saucer" was coined by reporter Bill Bequette, suggesting the term's origin is less clear but the phenomenon itself is ancient.

He observes that ufology has evolved from a romantic pursuit to a matter of belief. The passage of time has clarified many aspects, revealing a complex picture. Pescara uses the analogy of science fiction where the creature swallows the creator, suggesting ufology is now consuming its own researchers.

He highlights that the scientific community and governments often obscure the nature of the phenomenon. Pescara's research focuses on finding a tangible clue or sign to guide understanding. He acknowledges that not all strange occurrences are alien in origin, citing natural phenomena, deliberate fraud, and misinterpretations.

The Modern Fable

Pescara discusses the current media landscape, online discussions, and conferences, which he sees as a reflection of a long-standing phenomenon that has surpassed our ability to analyze and comprehend. He maintains that ufology is fundamentally physical, despite some esoteric interpretations. He reiterates the core questions: "Who are they?", "What are they?", "Where do they originate?", and "What is their purpose?" He speculates they could be biological entities incompatible with humans, or even organic robots that have gone out of control.

He criticizes the military and governments for confusing the public about the phenomenon. He believes that if our "undesirable guests" provoke a significant event, the curtain of secrecy might be lifted.

Pescara mentions the "Red Book of Flying Saucers" by the late Professor Flávio Augusto Pereira as a significant source of information, which he first encountered in 1960. He notes that while he doesn't personally associate with "ufoarchaeology," he recognizes its merits. His own work is built upon concrete, convincing, and verifiable cases happening in real-time.

A Bússola da Ufologia Enlouqueceu? (Has the Compass of Ufology Gone Mad?)

Pescara addresses the interest of younger generations in the history of ufology. He describes the current landscape as chaotic, filled with incredible and often incomprehensible reports, influenced by subjective interpretations. He argues that ufologists have failed to transform the collected data into digestible knowledge, making it difficult for newcomers to grasp the phenomenon. He questions whether the general public is truly interested in ufology, noting a lack of research on this topic.

He recalls his initial reaction of astonishment upon realizing Earth was being visited by alien beings. He believed humanity was not a cosmic accident and that we had company in the universe. However, the initial excitement gave way to reality when the visitors did not interact directly, merely observing from their craft. This led to disillusionment for some, while others persisted in their speculation and search for answers.

Pescara criticizes the current state of ufology, stating that it has become more about belief than evidence. He laments the gradual withdrawal of pioneers due to age or a loss of faith, and some even retracting their earlier claims. He believes the times have changed, and the alien phenomenon continues to challenge us. He calls for a reevaluation of ufology's direction, suggesting its "compass has gone mad" and a true north needs to be re-established.

Um Improvável Contato Global (An Unlikely Global Contact)

Pescara discusses humanity's inherent drive to face challenges, citing our survival through difficult circumstances in prehistoric times. He suggests that if we could observe our early ancestors, we would see a constant struggle for survival. He posits that the alien phenomenon presents a similar, profound challenge.

He acknowledges the contributions of Enrico Fermi's paradox, "If they exist, where are they all?" Pescara's answer is that aliens are here, on Earth, the Moon, and other celestial bodies in our solar system, based on extensive ufological evidence. However, he admits that this evidence, while abundant, lacks the irrefutable proof required for academic acceptance, leading ufology to become more of a belief system than a science. He criticizes the lack of a systematic approach to documenting and analyzing UFO reports, which hinders the development of a new science of ufology.

Pescara expresses concern that the "Babel of ufology" is on the verge of collapse due to distortions and internal conflicts. He sees this as an opportunity for opportunistic figures and religious movements to offer salvation.

He reflects on the six decades of modern ufology, noting with sadness the departure of pioneers. He observes that while many serious and well-intentioned individuals are involved in ufology, the time has come for critical reflection and a change in direction. He reiterates that the "compass of ufology has gone mad" and needs to be reset.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the nature of alien presence, particularly within our solar system, and the challenges faced by the field of ufology. The editorial stance, as expressed by both the editor and the main author, Nelson Pescara, is one of critical inquiry and a demand for rigorous, fact-based investigation. There is a strong emphasis on the potential aggressiveness of alien visitors and a call for a more structured and scientific approach to understanding the phenomenon, moving beyond mere belief or speculation. The magazine also touches upon the historical development of ufology and the contributions of its pioneers.

This issue of 'V Encontro de Ufologia Avançada de São Paulo' (V Advanced Ufology Encounter of São Paulo) is centered around an event held on August 27 and 28, hosted by Casa do Consolador and organized by UFO Revista Brasileira de Ufologia. The event features a lineup of conference speakers and a special guest, all contributing to discussions on ufology, spirituality, and science.

The Nature of Civilization and Contact

The articles delve into the complex concept of civilization, questioning what truly defines it. The author, Nelson Pescara, argues that civilization is dynamic and evolves over time, making it difficult to predict future advancements or even current states of being for other species. He contrasts the human experience of developing civilization with the unknown nature of extraterrestrial visitors, suggesting that a direct, unmediated contact might not be as beneficial or straightforward as often portrayed.

Pescara expresses skepticism about the common portrayal of aliens as benevolent beings, challenging the notion of 'cosmic little brothers.' He highlights that historical examples of contact between human civilizations have often been marked by conquest and exploitation, rather than mutual benefit. He posits that extraterrestrials, if they are indeed present, might have their own agenda, possibly related to resource acquisition or even a form of parasitic existence, rather than altruistic intentions.

Scientific and Technological Perspectives

The issue touches upon humanity's scientific and technological progress, referencing Enrico Fermi, a Nobel laureate in Physics. It acknowledges human achievements, such as space exploration, but questions whether these advancements adequately prepare us for potential extraterrestrial encounters. The concept of 'reverse engineering' is mentioned as a topic within ufology, but the author suggests that much of ufological discourse is driven by speculation rather than rigorous analysis.

Ufological Research and Skepticism

Nelson Pescara, a veteran ufologist, shares his perspective, emphasizing the need for critical analysis in ufology. He criticizes the tendency to romanticize aliens and dismiss the negative aspects of alleged encounters, such as abductions and physical harm. He advocates for a more grounded approach, urging for laboratory analysis of evidence and a careful examination of cause and effect when interpreting alleged miraculous cures attributed to extraterrestrials.

The articles also discuss the challenges of studying alien life forms, noting the difficulty in isolating and observing them due to their unpredictable behavior. The author suggests that while many researchers focus on the more sensational aspects of ufology, the darker, more aggressive behaviors of alleged alien visitors are often overlooked.

The V Encontro de Ufologia Avançada de São Paulo Event

The event itself is presented as a platform for exploring these complex themes. The list of conference speakers includes A. J. Gevaerd, Carlos Odone Nunes, Claudio Brasil, Jackson Camargo, Laura Maria Elias, Marco Antonio Petit, Margarete Aquila, Mônica de Medeiros, and Toni Inajar Kurowski. The special participation of Russian author and researcher Valery Michaelovich Uvarov is also highlighted, who will also conduct a workshop. The event is organized by UFO Revista Brasileira de Ufologia and Casa do Consolador, with support from Mythos Editora and Wilson Picler.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the critical examination of ufological claims, the nature of civilization, and the potential implications of extraterrestrial contact. The editorial stance, particularly through Nelson Pescara's contributions, is one of cautious skepticism towards overly optimistic or romanticized views of aliens, advocating for a more evidence-based and critical approach to the phenomenon. There is a clear emphasis on the potential dangers and complexities of such encounters, urging readers to consider the less palatable realities that might be involved.