Quaderni UFO - Vol 01 No 03 - 1981 07-08

Magazine Overview

Title: Quaderni UFO
Issue: N° 3
Volume: I
Date: July-August 1981
Publisher: Centro ufologico nazionale
Country: Italy
Language: Italian

This issue of Quaderni UFO, an internal publication of the Centro Ufologico Nazionale (CUN), serves as a supplement to the 'Notiziario UFO'. It features a cover illustration of multiple flying saucers and is dedicated to fostering discussion and analysis within the ufological community.

Articles and Content

La Risultante

Authored by Sergio Casadei from Ravenna, this article reflects on the first issue of 'Quaderni UFO' and identifies a common sentiment among contributors regarding a perceived gap in the organization of the CUN. Casadei discusses the contributions of various authors, including A. Chiumiento's educational elements on ufology, Roberto Farabone's call for a more specialized and organized approach similar to that of astrophysicists, and Edoardo Russo's critique of the lack of clear direction and proposed managerial solutions. Massimo Ferillo's article, which Casadei interprets as a 'check up' on the field, suggests practical steps like field exercises, didactic input, and training courses, culminating in a call for seminars. Casadei posits that his idea, 'La Risultante,' is the synthesis of these various proposals, aiming to consolidate diverse ideas into a unified initiative.

Casadei also mentions that he represents GRUIPA of Ravenna, a research group with good relations with the CUN, and that GRUIPA now represents the CUN for the province of Ravenna. He expresses gratitude to Gianfranco Neri for the opportunity to publish and hopes to contribute effectively to ufology.

Gli Inquisitori degli Anni '80

This section features a letter from Giorgio Metta of Cagliari, responding to an article by Giovanni Lucini in 'Quaderni N. 2'. Metta feels Lucini's arguments against his theses provide comfort that he is on the right track. He addresses Lucini's assertion that certain researchers are dismantling UFOlogy, and Lucini's positive view of this 'demolition' work as providing a new 'reason' for ufology. Metta contrasts researchers like Dominique Caudron, who he claims attempts to dismantle the Valensole case after 15 years, with astrophysicist Pierre Guérin, who, despite being a UFO believer, has rigorously investigated and demonstrated the unfoundedness of Caudron's claims. Metta aligns himself with those who defend the reality of UFO phenomena against what he terms 'reductionist' approaches, citing examples of French and Belgian researchers who he believes are attempting to debunk cases. He also critiques the article by 'Josiane & Jean d'Aigure' which attributes the 1897 US wave to experimental balloons and dirigibles, and Jean Sider's work in debunking such claims.

Metta expresses his frustration with those who call themselves ufologists but spend their time trying to destroy the work of others. He questions the distinction between 'existent' and 'real' and criticizes Lucini for misrepresenting his views. He asserts that while 90% of UFO reports can be explained conventionally, it is the remaining phenomena that are of interest. He also touches upon the 'BEHAVIOURISM' movement, which he believes is hostile to parapsychology and ufology, and names figures like Piero Angela and Antonino Zichichi as proponents.

Postscript (P.S.)

In a postscript, Metta comments on an article by Massimo Greco titled 'Gli UFO sono una droga?' (UFOs are a drug?). He agrees with Greco's general points but clarifies the distinction between researchers like Klass, Menzel, Sheafer, and Zichichi, who openly distance themselves from ufology, and those who continue to identify as ufologists while actively debunking cases. He also points out that Greco may have overlooked other prominent figures in the scientific and media landscape who have commented on UFOs. Metta believes that collaboration with UFO skeptics is unlikely, as their stance is often rooted in 'Behavourism,' which denies the existence of UFOs and PSI phenomena. He expresses concern that this 'French poison' might be spreading in Italy.

Ritorno sul Caso Valensole (Return to the Valensole Case) - Part 1

This section begins a series of articles on UFO events from abroad, starting with an analysis of the Valensole case by Pierre Guérin. The article is presented as a lucid and exhaustive analysis, providing new elements that make the 'celebrated mystery' even more dramatic and captivating.

1 - The Researcher's Point of View:

Guérin notes that some French ufologists, seeking recognition from official circles, have resorted to debunking UFO cases. He contrasts these 'new' ufologists, whose declared aim is to dismantle ufology, with those who conduct serious investigations. He highlights the efforts of three researchers who have focused on less complex cases, often with questionable methods, and mentions Dominique Caudron's attempts to debunk the Valensole case. Guérin positions himself and others like Aimé Michel and Jean Sider as defenders of ufology against such reductionist approaches.

He recounts the events of July 1, 1965, when Maurice M., a farmer in Valensole, reported seeing a UFO land in his lavender field. The initial report to the gendarmerie was cautious, but a later, more detailed deposition revealed M.'s close encounter with the object and its occupants. Guérin notes that the press coverage at the time focused on M.'s sighting and the presence of 'humanoids,' with some suggesting an explanation involving a military helicopter. However, the army denied this, and 'Le Monde' continued to promote the helicopter theory.

Guérin explains that M. initially downplayed the event to his family to avoid traumatizing them. The story gained traction when M. confided in his father and the local gendarmerie commander, Oliva. Aimé Michel, who had connections with the gendarmerie, was instrumental in obtaining M.'s full account. Guérin emphasizes that M.'s detailed description of the occupants, including their small stature and non-human features, was not an invention influenced by later ufological discussions, as suggested by some debunkers.

The Facts and Investigations on Site:

Guérin details the events of July 1, 1965, starting with M. noticing damage in his field. At approximately 5:45 AM, he heard a whistling sound and saw an object that he initially mistook for a helicopter or a Renault Dauphine car. Approaching cautiously, he realized it was an oval-shaped craft, about 3-4 meters long and 2.50 meters high, resting on six legs. He observed two small beings examining a lavender plant. As he got closer, he noticed their large heads and non-human faces. One being gestured to the other, and they both stood up. One pointed a tube-like object at M., immobilizing him. After a few minutes of discussion in 'gurgling' sounds, the beings re-entered the craft through a sliding door. The object then lifted off silently and flew away at high speed towards the west-southwest. M. was left immobilized for about fifteen minutes before regaining full control of his body.

Guérin notes that M.'s initial report to the gendarmerie was more reserved than his later deposition to Captain Valnet. He also mentions that the press reports, particularly from 'Le Provençal,' described M. seeing the craft at a distance of 30 meters and observing the occupants, who were described as dwarf-like, about 8 years old, wearing suits but no helmets, with bare hands. The article highlights that M.'s later account, which included more extraordinary details, was not initially revealed due to fear of being considered insane. The presence of these details in early reports, even if not fully disclosed to the public, suggests the anomalous nature of the occupants.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue of Quaderni UFO strongly emphasizes the need for better organization and a more structured approach within the field of ufology, particularly concerning the Centro Ufologico Nazionale (CUN). There is a clear tension between those who seek to rigorously investigate and analyze UFO phenomena and those who are perceived as attempting to debunk or dismiss them. The publication appears to champion serious, evidence-based research and critical analysis, while also acknowledging the importance of open discussion and the sharing of diverse perspectives. The re-examination of the Valensole case underscores the ongoing debate about the interpretation of historical UFO events and the credibility of witnesses. The editorial stance seems to be one of promoting a more professional and unified approach to ufology, encouraging collaboration and a move beyond personal disputes.

This issue of "Lumières Dans La Nuit" (translated from "Luce Nella Notte") from December 1980, specifically issue number 200, features a prominent article titled "Rapporto tra ir3 e gli altri tipi di evento ufologico" (Report on IR3 and other types of ufological events). The magazine appears to be Italian in origin, focusing on ufological studies, research, and analysis.

Article: "Rapporto tra ir3 e gli altri tipi di evento ufologico"

This article, authored by Gianfranco Mieli and Massimo Pigliucci, critically examines the classification of ufological events, particularly focusing on the distinction between different types of encounters. It argues that simply grouping all "UFO phenomena" under a single umbrella is a flawed approach, hindering progress in the field. The authors propose a classification system based on J. Lan Hendry's typology, simplifying it into five categories: Night Lights (LN), Day Discs (DD), and Close Encounters of the first, second, and third kind (IR1, IR2, IR3).

The article emphasizes that LN and DD events are often grouped due to similar appearance and behavior, while IR events involve increasing levels of interaction and physical evidence. It discusses potential explanations for these phenomena, categorizing them into 'background noise' (natural, terrestrial, psychological, or hoaxes) and 'UFO phenomena' (unknown natural phenomena, sociological phenomena, terrestrial prototypes, or alien intervention).

The authors highlight the difficulty in definitively categorizing events and suggest that many UFO sightings might be misinterpretations of known phenomena. They advocate for a more nuanced approach, recognizing the distinct nature of different types of UFO events.

Article: "Caso di Basiliano (Udine)"

Authored by Antonio Chiumiento, this section details a possible UFO event that occurred in Basiliano, Udine, Italy, on the night of December 25-26, 1978. The report is classified as a "close encounter of the third kind (IR III)".

The incident involved witnesses at a party who observed an unusual individual outside the premises. Descriptions of the individual include a large head, small mouth, almond-shaped eyes, and a white, possibly grey-green, one-piece suit. The witness, Paolo Serini, estimated the individual's height to be around 1.60 meters.

Following this observation, the witnesses went outside and found no one. Later that night, multiple witnesses observed a luminous object in the sky, described as a "conch-like" or "rugby ball" shape, with a bright, possibly yellowish-orange light. The object reportedly moved erratically, descended, and then disappeared.

The following morning, investigators found physical evidence, including a cup-shaped depression in the ground approximately 1.20 meters in diameter, with a central hole and four grooves forming a cross. Chemical analysis of the soil indicated a higher than normal calcium content. Additionally, unusual footprints were discovered in the garden, described as resembling those left by astronauts on the moon.

The report notes that the witnesses were initially hesitant to report the incident due to fear of ridicule. The article also touches upon the difficulty of developing a definitive explanation for such events, considering various possibilities from natural phenomena to alien intervention.

Article: "L'ufologia oggi; (studi, ricerche, analisi)"

Authored by Maurizio Verga, this piece discusses the current state of ufological research, particularly focusing on Italian UFO cases of "Type I" (Vallee's classification). Verga presents two preliminary reports: one on the temporal distribution of Type I sightings and another on their geographical distribution. He offers these reports to interested parties for a fee to cover reproduction and postage.

Verga emphasizes the need for critical analysis and a move away from common misconceptions in ufology. He highlights the importance of both temporal and geographical analysis in understanding UFO manifestations. He also mentions upcoming reports on the sociological aspects of UFO witnesses and physical trace evidence.

Article: "GRUPPO DIRETTO E GRUPPO INDIRETTO"

Authored by Daniele Lolicato, this section proposes a framework for analyzing ufological reports. Lolicato divides ufological analysis into two main groups: Direct and Indirect.

Direct Group: This involves direct interaction with the witness to assess their credibility. It includes gathering information about the witness's background, psychological state, and any potential biases. The goal is to determine the reliability of their testimony.

Indirect Group: This focuses on the analysis of the UFO report itself, including any physical evidence (like traces) that may have been left behind. While physical evidence is important, Lolicato notes that it may not always be sufficient for a definitive explanation.

Lolicato stresses that ufology requires a multidisciplinary approach, involving experts from various fields. He expresses concern about the lack of progress in ufology over its 34-year history and hopes for a more serious and scientific approach in the future.

Other Sections

The magazine also includes a section on "aggiornamenti" (updates), listing contacts for ufological researchers and organizations across Italy. There is also a section detailing the "regolamento generale C.u.n. (1981)" (General Regulations of the C.U.N. - Centro Ufologico Nazionale), outlining the organization's structure, objectives, and membership rules.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the scientific analysis and classification of UFO phenomena, the importance of credible witness testimony, and the investigation of physical evidence. The editorial stance appears to be one of advocating for a more rigorous, critical, and multidisciplinary approach to ufology, moving beyond sensationalism and speculation towards a more evidence-based understanding of UFO events. There is a clear emphasis on distinguishing between different types of encounters and their potential causes, with a particular focus on the "close encounter of the third kind" (IR3) and its implications.

Title: Quaderni UFO
Issue: 3
Date: July 31, 1981
Publisher: Centro Ufologico Nazionale (CUN)
Country: Italy
Language: Italian

This issue of Quaderni UFO, the internal publication of the Centro Ufologico Nazionale, focuses on the organizational structure, statutes, and operational aspects of the association. It provides detailed information for its members and collaborators, aiming to foster a more structured and professional approach to ufology in Italy.

Statutes and Organization of the Centro Ufologico Nazionale

The document meticulously outlines the internal regulations of the CUN, starting with the principles of membership and collaboration. Article 4 details the 'Quota sociale' (social fee), specifying that ordinary members must pay an annual fee, with a deadline of two months after the start of their associative relationship and annually by February. Failure to pay results in suspension of membership.

Article 5 describes the 'Tessera associativa' (membership card), which serves as personal identification, is nominative, non-transferable, and remains the property of the CUN. It is issued upon acceptance of membership and must be returned upon cessation of the associative relationship. Lost cards require a formal report to the authorities.

Article 6, under Title III (Organizational Structure), states that no member can hold more than two positions. It defines 'cariche' (positions) to include the Regional Coordinator and membership in directive teams of local branches ('Sede' and 'Sezione'), as well as the Treasurer and Secretary.

Article 7 explains the function of 'Commissioni' (Commissions), which are established by the C.D. (likely the Direttivo or Governing Board) to study specific problems or perform tasks within a set timeframe, requiring a detailed report upon completion.

Article 8 covers the 'Segreteria' (Secretariat), managed by one or more appointees, with a Secretary-General responsible for correspondence and distributing secretarial materials.

Article 9 introduces the 'Banca delle Documentazioni' (Documentation Bank), which consolidates the CUN's Central Archives. This bank is divided into five categories: A) Investigations (ufological events), B) Documentation (studies, books, specialized magazines), C) Press (published articles), D) Foreign (foreign magazines, books), and E) Photographic (photos, slides, films). The material is available to members upon request, with costs for reproduction and shipping determined by the C.D.

Article 10 details the 'Coordinamento Nazionale' (National Coordination), which utilizes an internal communication organ. Previously 'LA VOCE', it became 'Quaderni UFO' in March 1981, sent to all members and collaborators. 'Quaderni UFO' publishes summaries of Assembly and C.D. meetings, Commission and Official reports, and studies or investigation reports on significant cases. It is an internal publication funded by the Center. Member communication is also facilitated through at least quarterly meetings (regional, interregional, or national).

Article 11 describes the 'Coordinatori Regionali' (Regional Coordinators), who represent the CUN regionally, coordinate local branch activities, appoint branch directors, and report to the National Coordinator.

Article 12 outlines the 'Sedi Provinciali' (Provincial Branches), which can be organized to reflect the Center's sectoral structure. Establishing a branch requires at least three available members. A Provincial Delegate may be appointed temporarily to perform similar duties to a branch directive team.

Article 13 discusses 'Gruppi Giovanili' (Youth Groups), which can be formed by Branch Directors for collaborators under 18. These groups are to assist the branch or section and may have their own internal regulations, provided they do not conflict with the CUN's statutes. Youth group members generally cannot conduct investigations without authorization.

Article 14 details the 'Tesoreria' (Treasury), managed by a Treasurer responsible for the budget, balance sheet, and accounting books. The Treasurer must periodically present reports to the Statutory Auditors. A bank account is established within the Treasury for the CUN.

Article 15 addresses the 'Diritto di prelazione' (Right of Pre-emption). In case of membership termination, if an ex-member wishes to dispose of their ufological material (books, magazines, recordings, films), the CUN reserves the right of pre-emption for commercial value items and the possibility of acquiring other documentation without commercial value (letters, printouts).

Editorial Notes and Contributions

The editorial section expresses satisfaction with the contributions received for the first three issues from ufologists across Italy, mentioning specific cities. The editors provide guidelines for future submissions, emphasizing the need for original, clearly typed manuscripts with good print quality, specific margins (2 cm on all sides), standard paper size (21 x 29.7 cm), single line spacing, and a maximum length of 6-7 'cartelle' (pages or sheets, likely referring to typed pages) to avoid publication in installments. They also mention the valuable contributions of Giorgio Metta, formerly of NURAGHEX, and express regret over the cessation of that publication.

List of CUN Branches and Updates

The issue includes an extensive list of addresses for CUN 'Sedi' (Branches) and 'Sezioni' (Sections) across various Italian cities, along with contact telephone numbers. This list is updated as of July 31, 1981, with new entries for Bresso (MI), Loano (SV), Pisa, Sannazzaro de' Burgondi (PV), and Vigevano (PV).

Reviews

'Intelligenze Extraterrestri' by Roberto Pirotti and Maurizio Blondet

The review section features a critique of the book 'Intelligenze Extraterrestri' by Roberto Pirotti and Maurizio Blondet, published by Editoriale Olimpia. The reviewer notes that the book addresses humanity's search for explanations about the universe and the possibility of extraterrestrial communication. It is praised for its extensive and reliable documentation, presenting verified facts and opinions from accredited scientists worldwide. The book aims to provide a summary of the activities of exobiologists and radio astronomers in the search for extraterrestrial life. A secondary result highlighted is the book's information on ufologists' activities in studying UFOs globally. The review recommends the book for those new to the subject due to its accessible journalistic style and for Italian ufologists, as it addresses pressing questions in a context of perceived stagnation in national and international ufology.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue strongly emphasizes the organizational framework and professionalization of ufology within Italy through the Centro Ufologico Nazionale. The editorial stance is one of promoting structured research, clear communication channels, and standardized submission guidelines for contributors. There is a clear effort to consolidate resources, share information effectively, and establish a national network of ufological study. The review of 'Intelligenze Extraterrestri' suggests an alignment with a scientific and evidence-based approach to the study of UFOs and extraterrestrial intelligence, while acknowledging the challenges and perceived stagnation in the field.