Project Red Book vol 1 no 12 aka YUFOS Magazine

Magazine Overview

YUFOS Magazine, Volume 1, Issue 12, published in June 1998 by the Yorkshire UFO Society, is a 76-page publication (based on page numbering across the scanned pages) that delves into various aspects of UFO research. The cover prominently features an interview with John Carpenter and a mention of the 'North Sea UFO' case, along with graphic imagery.

Contents

The magazine's contents page lists several articles and features:

• FLYING SAUCERS - SECRET HISTORY (PART 2) by Tim Matthews (Pages 1-5)
• LETTERS (Page 5)
• NEW WRINKLES IN NORTH SEA UFO CASE by Joseph Trainor (Pages 6-8)
• JOHN CARPENTER INTERVIEW (Pages 7-10)
• IN MY OPINION by Andrew Ashmore (Pages 13-14)
• CSETI UPDATE ON 'PROJECT STARLIGHT' by Steven M. Greer (Pages 15-18)
• RENDLESHAM UNRAVELLED - NOT!!! by Georgina Bruni (Pages 18-20)
• MIND-SETS by Dave Baker (Pages 21-23)
• REVIEWS by Richard Moss & Dave Baker (Page 24)
• UFO GROUPS by Dave Baker (Page 25)

Flying Saucers - Secret History (Part 2)

This article by Tim Matthews explores the historical development of circular and flying wing aircraft, particularly focusing on German designs from the mid-1930s. It discusses Professor Heinrich Focke's interest in helicopter and autogyro technologies, leading to his patent for a saucer-type aircraft with enclosed twin rotors in 1939. The article also examines Dr. Alexander Lippisch's work on triangular aircraft ('DM' series) and his advanced Supersonic Flying Wing design, which hinted at later triangular UFO shapes. The AS6 (V1) aircraft, partly designed by Lippisch and built by Messerschmidt, is mentioned, drawing parallels with the Zimmerman V173 'flying flapjack'. The article notes that circular wing designs were often chosen for technical reasons, offering inherent strength and ease of construction. It also touches upon the early 'stealth' capabilities of these designs. The piece then shifts to claims of more advanced jet-powered flying saucers designed from around 1943, citing Flight Captain Rudolph Schriever, who claimed to have worked on such a vehicle near Prague. Schriever stated he made blueprints for a 'flying top' before Germany's collapse, capable of 2,600 mph. A 1975 report in Lufifahrt International is mentioned, which took Schriever's claims seriously. The article also presents the account of George Klein, who claimed to have witnessed a flying saucer test on February 14, 1945, near Prague, reaching 30,000ft in three minutes and high speeds. Klein suggested the saucers might have used gyroscopes for stability, similar to German rockets, and that some work occurred at Peenemünde and the Mittlewerke underground facilities. The article references Robert Jungk's book 'Brighter Than A Thousand Suns', which notes the indifference of Hitler's regime to natural sciences, with the exception of the Air Ministry's research into new aircraft types, including flying discs. The footnote details that specialists Schriever, Habermohl, and Miethe built circular flying saucers, approximately 45 yards in diameter, which were airborne on February 14, 1945, over Prague, reaching a height of nearly eight miles and a speed of 1250mph, later doubled. Habermohl is believed to have fallen into Soviet hands, while Miethe developed similar craft for A.V Roe and Company in the US. The article highlights research by Bill Rose, who investigated the German flying saucer claims. Rose discovered that Dr. Walter Miethe was involved with Schriever and Klaus Habermohl, directing saucer programs near Prague. After testing in May 1945, Miethe and Schriever fled towards Allied forces, while Habermohl was captured by Soviets. Klaus Habermohl is credited with developing the radial-flow jet engine. Rose learned of film footage of test flights, with stills suggesting a saucer around 75ft in diameter. The article concludes by noting that Schriever himself may have piloted the test craft, though performance characteristics might have been exaggerated. It also mentions Dr. Miethe's connection to Werner von Braun and their inclusion on a 'Black List' of scientists.

Letters Page

A brief section indicates that YUFOS receives few letters, but those received are usually noteworthy. A lengthy quote, seemingly religious in nature, is presented, followed by a humorous sign-off: "At least they didn't get me out of the bath!"

New Wrinkles Emerge in North Sea UFO Case

This article, referencing UFO Roundup Volume 3, Number 22, reports on a controversial case where a giant UFO was allegedly chased over the North Sea by British and Dutch jet interceptors. The RAF radar station at Fylingdales reportedly detected a UFO 'the size of a battleship' (900 feet long). While the RAF Press Office and Dutch ufology group A.U.R.A. disputed the claim, new information surfaced. An Irish newspaper, the Tipperary Star, reported a local couple's sighting of a similar object on February 28, described as 250 feet wide and 100 feet high, hovering at 400 feet, with lights and panels, moving slowly before accelerating rapidly. In the Netherlands, the radio talk show Dossier X investigated, finding that the Nederlandse Luchtmacht conducted an internal investigation but claimed to have found nothing, with reports of destroyed investigation files. The Dossier X team noted encountering 'angry spokespersons' and a setback for UFO research in the Netherlands.

John Carpenter Interview

This section features an interview with John S. Carpenter, who holds degrees in Psychology and Social Work and is trained in Clinical Hypnosis. He has investigated over 120 alleged UFO abduction cases and lectures on patterns found in the data. The interview covers several topics:

• Budd Hopkins' 'The Brooklyn Bridge Abduction' with Linda Cortile: Carpenter considers it an incredible story with substantial documentation, a case that will stand for years, and commends Budd Hopkins' careful investigation.
• Accuracy and Safety of Hypnotism: Carpenter states that hypnosis is only as good as the practitioner. He emphasizes asking leading questions in an investigative manner to elicit logical answers, steering away from bizarre abduction data. He notes that subjects generally stick to their accounts.
• 'Face in the Window' Story: He recounts a case in rural Missouri where an anomalous face-like image appeared in a picture window for three seconds, captured on video. The incident involved a guarding Rottweiler and barking dogs, with no footprints. An orange sphere was sighted later. The family released the video after three months, but the FBI and Air Force reportedly dismissed it.
• False Memory and Abduction Suspicions: Regarding patients who suspect they have been abducted or whose lives are in a mess, Carpenter acknowledges that while false memories can occur, the abduction scenario itself is often bizarre with many unpublished details. He believes people would not typically choose such an explanation unless it was real.
• First Abduction Case: Carpenter states that the Betty and Barney Hill case was not the first, with major researchers having cases from the 1930s and 1940s, suggesting abductions occurred throughout past centuries.
• Client Screening: He sends out a screening form combining UFO investigation and psychiatric social history, asking about sightings, beings, marks, and personal details. About 50% do not return the form.
• Most Credible UFO Case: He finds it hard to pick one, but mentions Budd Hopkins' books 'INTRUDERS' and 'WITNESSED', and the Kelly Cahill case in Australia involving three simultaneous 'parallel abductions' with matching physical marks and ground traces.
• Abduction Conviction vs. Reality: Carpenter agrees that some people may be convinced they were abducted when they were not, and vice versa.
• Self-Delusion: As a psychologist, he sees himself as a data collector without personal belief. He believes people who delude themselves do so in a less matching and bizarre manner than the correlating patterns observed in abduction cases.

In My Opinion

This section by Andrew Ashmore is not detailed in the provided scans.

CSETI Update on 'Project Starlight'

This section by Steven M. Greer is not detailed in the provided scans.

Rendlesham Unravelled - Not!!!

This section by Georgina Bruni is not detailed in the provided scans.

Mind-Sets

This section by Dave Baker is not detailed in the provided scans.

Reviews

This section by Richard Moss & Dave Baker is not detailed in the provided scans.

UFO Groups

This section by Dave Baker is not detailed in the provided scans.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine appears to maintain a critical yet open-minded stance towards UFO phenomena. It explores historical accounts of advanced aircraft that bear resemblance to UFOs, suggesting technical rather than mystical origins for some designs. The publication also engages with contemporary UFO cases, such as the North Sea incident, and delves into the controversial field of abduction research through interviews with experts like John Carpenter. The editorial stance seems to favor rigorous investigation and the presentation of diverse viewpoints, while acknowledging the challenges and potential for misinterpretation within the field. The inclusion of letters and opinion pieces suggests an aim to foster discussion among its readership.

This issue of YUFOS magazine, published in the 1990s, features a collection of articles and discussions centered around UFOs, alien abductions, government secrecy, and the potential for disclosure. The content is primarily in English and includes a Q&A format with various individuals contributing their perspectives.

Key Articles and Discussions

Q&A with Researchers

The magazine includes an extensive Q&A session with individuals identified by pseudonyms such as <Ros>, <TopGun_>, <Janitor>, <SickBoy>, <Rimmer>, <moonhead>, <UFO-conta>, <pathFINDR>, and <Gandalft>. The discussions cover a wide range of topics:

• Hypnotic Regression: The effectiveness and dangers of hypnotic regression are debated, with one participant emphasizing its value in research and another noting the British Medical Association's concerns about distinguishing memory from fantasy.
• Alien Agendas: Theories about the agenda of non-human intelligences are explored, including hybridization programs and a potential 'take-over' scenario, though one participant expresses skepticism about an imminent takeover.
• Government Knowledge: The possibility of the US government being able to create UFOs is discussed, with the consensus being that while possible now, it wasn't the case in the mid-20th century when many sightings occurred.
• Abduction Experiences: The similarities in abduction experiences are discussed, with one perspective suggesting it might be explained by similar brain structures, while another dismisses this entirely. The nature of abduction experiences, including missing time and the return to incorrect locations, is also examined.
• Interdimensional UFOs: The concept of UFOs being interdimensional is raised, and the possibility of encountering different types of beings is mentioned.
• Implant Technology: The issue of alleged alien implants is briefly touched upon.
• Celtic Faerie Faith: A question is posed about the connection between the Celtic faerie faith and modern UFO phenomena.
• Family History and Abductions: The tracing of abduction cases through family histories, spanning multiple generations, is highlighted as a significant area of research, suggesting a potential longitudinal study by extraterrestrial intelligence.
• Nature of the Phenomenon: One researcher expresses strong conviction that the phenomenon is real and verifiable, extending beyond fantasy, false memories, or psychiatric disorders, comparing the situation to ants realizing they are not alone.

"IN MY OPINION: UFOS - WILL ALL EVER BE REVEALED?" by Andrew Ashmore

This opinion piece questions whether governments, aware of the UFO phenomenon, would ever disclose their findings. Ashmore suggests that governments prioritize control over public information and that revealing knowledge about UFOs could lead to a new form of religion or guidance, potentially challenging existing world leaders. He posits that UFOs, being a phenomenon that transcends all boundaries, could unite humanity. The article also touches upon the testing of chemicals on humans by Americans in the 1950s as an example of information withheld from the public. Ashmore concludes that governments may be losing their grip and might eventually have no choice but to inform the public, despite potential consequences like panic and hysteria.

Dr. Steven Greer's Update On CSETI Project Starlight

This section details CSETI's strategic plan and efforts over several years to achieve disclosure of the UFO/ETI subject. Key points include:

• Strategic Plan: The plan involved collecting evidence, identifying top-secret witnesses willing to come forward, and creating a team to brief government officials.
• Briefings: CSETI conducted briefings with senior officials in the US government, including the CIA Director and White House advisors.
• Government Reluctance: Despite efforts, senior officials found it difficult to penetrate the secrecy surrounding 'black' programs, with the CIA Director stating they could not disclose what they did not know or have access to.
• Alternative Strategy: Faced with government reluctance, CSETI decided to pursue disclosure without government involvement, citing the need to bypass bureaucratic delays and timid politicians.
• Privatized Disclosure: The plan involves a multi-media approach including a world news conference, documentary series, books, and a scientific summit, to be executed by a civilian-led program.
• Witness Concerns: Many witnesses fear for their lives and prefer an official setting with immunity from prosecution for violating national security oaths.
• Congressional Involvement: While CSETI prefers official channels, they note that many in Congress and the White House have recommended bypassing the government. The hope is that a civilian-led disclosure will enhance the likelihood of open Congressional hearings.

"RENDLESHAM UNRAVELLED -NOT!" by Georgina Bruni, UFO-UPDATES

This article critically examines a paper by James Easton titled "Rendlesham Unravelled," which questioned the original witness statements regarding the Rendlesham Forest UFO incident. The author, Georgina Bruni, with input from original researcher Jenny Randles, suggests that Easton's approach, while bringing findings to the public, may have drifted into a negative stance and misrepresented Randles. The article reiterates the significance of the Rendlesham incident, referencing a Freedom of Information document ('The Halt Memo') and an audio recording of Lt Colonel Charles Halt and patrolmen investigating unexplained lights in the forest in December 1980.

Meetings and Events

Announcements for upcoming YUFOS meetings are included:

• Tuesday, July 14th: A meeting featuring Eric Morris discussing 'MEN IN BLACK'.
• Tuesday, August 11th: A presentation by Rory Lushman (PHUFON).

Both meetings are scheduled to take place at The Three Cranes Public House, Queen Street, Sheffield City Centre.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the persistent mystery of UFOs, the nature of alien encounters and abductions, the role of governments in concealing information, and the ongoing efforts by researchers and organizations like CSETI to bring about disclosure. The magazine appears to adopt a stance that supports the reality of the UFO phenomenon and advocates for transparency, while also critically examining specific cases and research methodologies. There is a clear emphasis on the importance of witness testimony and the challenges faced in obtaining official acknowledgment and disclosure from governmental bodies. The editorial stance leans towards encouraging public awareness and participation in resolving what is presented as one of the most important issues of our time.

This issue of YUFOS magazine, dated April 30, 1998, features a cover story and several articles that critically examine UFO phenomena, with a particular focus on the Rendlesham Forest incident and the broader landscape of ufological research and debate.

Rendlesham Forest Incident Debated

The magazine delves into the Rendlesham Forest incident, presenting conflicting viewpoints and questioning the veracity of witness statements. It highlights the claims of witnesses like Burroughs, Penniston, and Cabansag, and introduces James Easton's paper which suggests that the flashing light observed was likely the Orford lighthouse, a point of contention. Sceptic Ian Ridpath is quoted via email, stating that Easton found documents indicating that airmen and Charles Halt were aware the light was the lighthouse. Jenny Randles expresses that the witnesses always insisted their statements were not the full story and that Easton's paper raises serious questions. Colonel (Ret) Charles Halt is shown to be alarmed that Easton had access to witness statements, some of which contained Halt's handwritten notes expressing doubt about a witness's full account. The article also brings up Chris Arnold, another witness produced by Easton, who claimed involvement in a 'non event' and accused others of 'snookering' everyone. However, Charles Halt reportedly deemed Arnold not credible, though he confirmed Arnold was at the Woodbridge base that night, but not involved in the incident.

Radiation Readings and New Witnesses

The issue touches upon radiation readings at Rendlesham, with Nick Pope stating that while the levels were harmless, they were ten times normal and peaked at the alleged landing site. Pope's assessment was based on checks with the Defence Radiological Protection Service. The article notes that new witnesses have come forward in recent months, suggesting a more complex picture of events than initially presented. An incident at RAF Watton on December 27, 1980, is also mentioned, reported by an ex-RAF serviceman.

Mind-Sets: Navigating Ufological Divisions

Dave Baker's column, "MIND-SETS," addresses the significant problem of divisions and personality clashes within the ufology community. He describes the stark contrast between 'Down to Earth' researchers like Paul Devereux and Andy Roberts, who focus on phenomena like crop circles and earth-lights, and those who believe in ETs, alien abductions, and covert governments, such as Omar Fowler and Max Burns. Baker criticizes the tendency for researchers to be either completely believing or completely skeptical, advocating for an open mind and a juror-like approach to evaluating evidence. He uses the example of the Yorkshire UFO-Crash, where Dave Clarke's interpretation of RAF aircraft on secret maneuvers is contrasted with other theories.

The Authenticity of UFO Evidence

The article explores the contentious issue of UFO photographs, questioning the lack of close-up, convincing images of structured craft. Dave Clarke's view is presented: that no such photos exist because UFOs of that ilk do not exist. Tim Matthews' work is cited, suggesting that many UFOs, including flying triangles and discs, are actually 'Man Made UFOs' or black project military craft. The famous McMinnville photograph is discussed, with Tim Matthews pointing out its similarity to the de-classified Project Silverbug craft, suggesting it might be a photo of a man-made object. The article warns against dismissing evidence due to preconceived 'mindsets' or assuming all contradictory information is deliberate disinformation.

Reviews

This issue includes reviews of two books:

• Close Encounters of the Fourth Kind by C.D.B. Brian, reviewed by Richard Moss. The book is described as an interesting, though heavy, read, split into a transcript of the 1992 M.I.T. Conference on Alien Abductions and a collection of hypnotic regression sessions with two women who experienced abductions. The writing is noted as report-like, leaving interpretation to the reader.
• Alien Agenda by Jim Marrs, reviewed by Dave Baker. Marrs, known for his work on conspiracies, is said to lead the reader on an exhaustive journey through ufology, covering topics like Nazi UFOs, MJ-12, and remote viewing. The review suggests it's an excellent read for those wanting to catch up, offering lesser-known facts. Marrs is credited with showing both sides of arguments without imposing conclusions.

• The UFO Evidence edited by Richard Hall, reviewed by Dave Baker. Originally printed in 1964 by NICAP, this book is described as a classic and indispensable study of thousands of UFO reports investigated by NICAP up to 1963, containing reports, diagrams, and witness illustrations.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently adopts a critical and analytical stance towards UFO phenomena. It encourages a rigorous examination of evidence, questioning established narratives, and challenging the biases and 'mindsets' that can cloud judgment within the ufological community. The editorial stance appears to favor evidence-based reasoning and open-minded investigation, while acknowledging the divisions and sometimes contentious nature of the field. There is a clear emphasis on distinguishing between genuine phenomena and misidentifications, hoaxes, or 'man-made UFOs'. The magazine also highlights the importance of considering all sides of an argument and working collaboratively to uncover the truth, rather than succumbing to entrenched skepticism or uncritical belief.