Phenomenes Inconnus - No 13 - sept 1970 - CFRS

Magazine Overview

"Phénomènes Inconnus" N° 13, a bi-monthly publication from September 1970, marks a shift towards more direct investigation of UFO phenomena. The issue begins with an "Editorial" by Pierre DELVAL, discussing the positive results of a reader survey conducted for issue N° 12. This survey provided valuable feedback on reader preferences and helped shape the magazine's future direction. The survey indicated that readers are highly engaged with the content, with a significant majority appreciating a well-presented publication. The primary interest for readers lies in UFO studies (83%), followed by civilizations and archaeology (60%), and astronautics/astrophysics (60%). Other topics of interest include unexplained phenomena, parapsychology, and esotericism.

The magazine's format is largely favored, with 99% of readers preferring the current 21/27 size, and a desire for 20-30 pages per issue. Illustrations are also highly valued (94%). The publication will avoid serializing long articles, opting instead for special issues when necessary, with 76% of readers supporting this approach.

Regarding UFO investigations, 85% of readers believe that the work of various groups has yielded positive results, citing advancements in understanding UFO-fault correlations, classification of the problem, researcher coordination, and the highlighting of the reality and evolution of these phenomena. The investigations have also helped prevent the issue from being completely dismissed by official authorities.

Progression and Editorial Stance

The editorial highlights the growing influence and membership of the C.F.R.S. (Cercle Français de Recherches Scientifiques), now comprising ten sections, including international affiliates. The organization's focus is shifting towards direct UFO investigation, with complex organizational structures currently being developed. This new direction is exemplified by the publication of a full report on "LA SOUTERRAINE" from the C.I.E.S.P.I. of Poitiers, and plans for two more significant dossiers on investigations in Sarre and the Basses-Alpes.

The editorial also touches upon the justification for forming specialized research groups, citing the need for information coordination, objective and independent work, rational study of the UFO enigma, public awareness, and the potential for discovering new principles. A significant majority (80%) of subscribers believe that scientific participation is crucial for progress in this field.

Reader Survey Analysis

Page 3 delves deeper into the reader survey results. It confirms that 83% of readers prioritize UFO studies, 60% are interested in civilizations and archaeology, and another 60% in astronautics and astrophysics. The articles published from issue 1 (November 1967) to issue 12 (July 1970) were rated as follows: 55% "good," 20% "excellent," 15% "average," 7% "perfect," and 3% "mediocre." The preference for the current format (21/27) is strong, with a majority wishing for more pages (20-30). Illustrations are also desired when appropriate.

Regarding the publication of articles, 76% of readers prefer special issues over serialized long articles. The survey also revealed that 85% of readers believe that investigations have yielded results, with positive outcomes including orthoteny, UFO-fault correlation, researcher regrouping, new hypotheses, public awareness, and international investigations. The efforts of these groups are credited with preventing the issue from being ignored by official bodies and contributing to scientific, human, and historical knowledge.

CFRS and Research Methods

Page 4 discusses the CFRS's commitment to a scientific research method, inspired by Jacques Vallée's assertion that "research method RESERVED ALL POSSIBILITIES." The motivations for forming specialized groups include coordinating information, ensuring objective and independent work, rationally studying the UFO enigma, establishing the reality of phenomena for the public, understanding the intentions of potential visitors, countering scientific skepticism, and potentially discovering new principles.

80% of subscribers believe that scientific participation aids progress, while 6% disagree and 14% are undecided. The selection of books by readers indicates a scientific approach to the UFO problem, with titles covering various aspects of flying saucers, extraterrestrials, and scientific investigations.

The Condon Report Controversy

Pages 5 and 6 focus on the controversy surrounding the Condon Report. Georges W. EARLEY, an engineer with a background in aeronautics and exobiology, is introduced. His work includes studies on UFOs and participation in the Apollo 11 mission. The article notes the cessation of NICAP's activities due to financial issues.

Scientists, including Dr. James E. McDonald and Dr. David Saunders, express strong criticism of the Condon Report. They argue that it represents a superficial and inadequate study of the UFO problem. The report is described as a waste of time and money, failing to adequately address the scientific and atmospheric aspects of numerous UFO manifestations. The article highlights that the US Air Force's approach to UFOs was characterized by a policy of depreciation rather than scientific investigation.

Several prominent scientists are mentioned as having participated in symposiums where the Condon Report was discussed and criticized. These include Dr. J. Allen Hynek, Dr. James E. McDonald, Dr. James A. Harder, Dr. R. Leo Sprinkle, Dr. Frank B. Salisbury, and Dr. David R. Saunders. These scientists, many of whom were involved with the Condon Committee, were critical of its conclusions and called for a new analysis of the phenomenon.

Dr. McDonald is quoted as calling the Condon Report "the worst piece of work ever produced by scientists," and Dr. Hynek states that the report's assertion that UFOs do not exist was made by individuals who "never took the time or the effort to study the question correctly."

Dr. Saunders emphasizes the need for scientific investigation of UFOs, suggesting that focusing on isolated cases like Exeter might be less productive than analyzing the vast number of observations to identify patterns and gather more data.

Specific Articles and Case Studies

Article B: "A New Ufological Research" by G.W. EARLEY (Page 14)

This article discusses the scientific community's increasing engagement with UFO research following the closure of Project Blue Book. It highlights a symposium in Denver in August 1969, where scientists demanded a new, objective analysis of the UFO problem. Key figures like Dr. James E. McDonald and Dr. David Saunders are mentioned as participants who were critical of the Condon Report.

Article C: "On the Subject of Related Questions ('A.P.S.L.', 1905)" (Page 7)

This section briefly touches upon a historical account from 1905, referencing an unusual "cloud" phenomenon observed by the captain of the ship "LOHICAN" near Delaware Breakwater. The cloud was described as phosphorescent, magnetic, and capable of immobilizing objects on board. This is presented as an early example of an unexplained aerial phenomenon.

Article D: "The 'Rock with Feet' of the Vanoise ('D.-L.', 1970)" (Page 8)

This article discusses prehistoric carvings found in the Vanoise National Park, France. Specifically, it describes a rock formation known as "La Roche aux pieds" (The Rock with Feet) which features cupules and engravings of human footprints. These findings suggest that the mountainous region may have served as a gathering place with religious significance in ancient times.

Article E: "The Incidents of the Odyssey of the 'Ra-2'" by Francis SCHAEFER (Page 9)

This article details two UFO sightings during Thor Heyerdahl's "Ra-2" expedition across the Atlantic in June 1970. The first sighting, on June 11th, involved an unidentified flying object of intense orange color and luminosity. The following day, June 12th, two crew members observed a similar object moving rapidly across the sky. The article also briefly mentions the earlier "Ra-1" expedition and its challenges, suggesting a possible influence of ancient Egyptian civilization on Mexican cultures.

Article F: "CFRS Communiqué" (Page 11)

This is a brief communiqué from the CFRS, likely related to organizational matters or research updates.

Article G: "Luminous Form Above LA SOUTERRAINE" (Page 13)

This section contains the full report of an investigation by the CIESPI of Poitiers concerning a luminous aerial phenomenon observed above La Souterraine. This is presented as a significant case study.

Article H: "UFOs - Recent Observations" (Dossiers CFRS) (Page 19)

This section likely presents a collection of recent UFO sightings and observations compiled by the CFRS.

Article I: "Hypotheses on the Propulsion of UFOs" (Raymond DECLERCK) (Page 22)

This article explores theoretical concepts regarding the propulsion systems of unidentified flying objects.

Article J: "Unusual Phenomena (in the North Pole?)" (Dossier CFRS) (Page 25)

This section investigates unusual phenomena reported from the North Pole region, presented as a CFRS dossier.

Article K: "The Highly Contested 'Critique' by Mr. Gérald ESSADIE" (Page 27)

This article addresses a critique by Gérald Essadie, likely concerning UFO research or phenomena, and presents a counter-argument or discussion.

Article L: "A Necessary Clarification" (Francis SCHAEFFER) (Page 28)

Francis Schaeffer provides a clarification on a specific topic, possibly related to previous articles or ongoing debates within the ufological community.

Article M: "Bibliography - PI N° 13" (Page 30)

This section lists bibliographic references relevant to the content of issue N° 13.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue of "Phénomènes Inconnus" are the scientific investigation of UFOs, the critical examination of official reports like the Condon Report, the exploration of ancient civilizations and their potential connection to extraterrestrial contact, and the reporting of recent UFO sightings. The editorial stance is clearly pro-investigation, advocating for a rigorous, scientific approach and encouraging reader participation. There is a strong undercurrent of skepticism towards official dismissals of UFO phenomena and a belief in the importance of independent research groups like the CFRS. The magazine aims to be a platform for detailed case studies, theoretical discussions, and the dissemination of information that challenges conventional explanations.

This issue of "Phénomènes Inconnus" (Unknown Phenomena), dated June 1970, focuses on reports of unidentified flying objects (UFOs) and unusual aerial phenomena. The magazine presents detailed accounts, witness testimonies, and preliminary analyses of several incidents, primarily from France and the Caribbean.

NORAD and the Caribbean Sighting

The issue begins by referencing NORAD (North American Aerospace Defense Command) and their potential involvement in verifying UFO reports, questioning the difficulty of verifying simple facts like rocket launches. It then details an observation made on the night of June 30, 1970, by Norman Baker of "RA-2," who reported a semi-circular object in the sky that was four times larger than the Moon and visible for about ten minutes. This sighting was corroborated by numerous fishermen and inhabitants on the islands of St. Thomas and St. Croix, who also reported seeing a "saucer."

Norman Baker, a navigator aboard Thor Heyerdahl's "RA-2" and a radio amateur, described the night as clear with bright stars. He stated the object was about 5 degrees above the horizon and appeared four times larger than the Moon, with an illuminated area comparable to the Moon itself. A note clarifies that the UFO itself was the size of a full moon, but a luminous halo made it appear larger. Baker's account was confirmed by Thor Heyerdahl and anthropologist Santiago Genoves. Baker further described the object's size increasing, maintaining a semi-circular shape with less defined contours, while the central luminosity remained intense, and the periphery faded.

On July 1, 1970, radio operator Richard Ehrhorn reported that a study group from the University of Redlands (California) had requested a recording of the "RA-2" message. Scientists were examining the possibility that Baker had seen a "Poseidon" rocket launched around the same time from Cape Kennedy. However, the report notes that if it were a Poseidon rocket, it would have had to hover in the air for 10 minutes, which seemed unlikely.

The "Triangle of Death" and the "Calamara"

The article then draws a parallel to the "triangle of death," a region where planes, ships, and humans disappear, defined by a line from Florida to Bermuda, Bermuda to Puerto Rico, and Puerto Rico back to Florida via the Bahamas. The UN research vessel "Calamara" joined "RA-2" to collect samples of polluted waters and marine species, but it is noted that "Calamara" had also observed a strange celestial phenomenon.

The "RA-2" Expedition and UFO Observations

On the night of July 13, 1970, the "RA-2," a replica of an ancient Egyptian vessel, reached its objective of crossing the Atlantic. The expedition concluded off the coast of Barbados. The "RA-2" logged three notable UFO observations during its journey. The article cites "Les vrais mystères de la mer" by Editions FRANCE-EMPIRE, Paris, and notes discrepancies in the dates of the first two observations as reported in the press (June 11-12, 1970, in France, and June 10-11, 1970, by Agerpress). Sources for the article include "Informatia Bucurestiului" (Romania), "Luxemburger Wort" (Luxembourg), "Le Républicain Lorrain," and "France-Journal."

CFRS and UFO Codification

On August 10, 1970, the director of "Phénomènes Inconnus" met with Patrick Huyghe, a correspondent from the USA. Huyghe shared a UFO observation codification system developed by an American collaborator, J. Erhart, known as "ERHART DATA INDEX SYSTEME-EDIS," which CFRS proposed to adopt. This system is reportedly used by most American ufologists. Huyghe had also analyzed known UFO observations from 1967-1968 and from late 1969 to early 1970. His work is published in the journal "UFO Commentary."

Luminous Object Above La Souterraine (Creuse)

This section details an observation made on September 3, 1969, near La Souterraine, France. M. Laguide and M. Zamit were driving when they noticed a luminous glow. They observed a luminous ball that appeared to follow their car and then remained stationary for about twenty minutes. Laguide, a rally driver, was intrigued by its unusual behavior. The ball seemed to follow an ascending hyperbolic trajectory, its size diminishing. They lost sight of it and then found it again, stopping the car to observe it for another fifteen minutes. They then drove to a friend's house, approximately 180 meters away, and observed the object for another five minutes.

Laguide, concerned, returned home to get his camera and then went back to La Souterraine, where he encountered insurance agents and his parents observing the same luminous object. He took three successive photos with his Kodak Retinette IA. Despite his efforts to frame the object, the developed negatives showed the image consistently shifted upwards and to the right, suggesting a slow but constant upward and rightward movement.

Laguide's mother and other witnesses described the object as very luminous, causing a tingling sensation in their eyes, with a white color comparable to neon signs. The object appeared to have a distinct shape surrounded by a halo, giving it the appearance of a luminous ball. To bring out the object's shape in the photographs, overexposure was required.

Jean-Louis Becquereau, a member of GEPA, conducted angular surveys, noting azimuths and elevations. The data suggested the object was at a relatively low altitude and potentially stationary at one point. Laguide estimated the object's angular diameter, but this was later found to be underestimated. Calculations based on the photograph indicated an angular diameter of 2 degrees.

Meteorological Data and Hypotheses

Meteorological data for September 3, 1969, indicated overcast skies with stratus clouds between 240m and 280m, and altocumulus clouds at 2500m. The CIESPI deduced from the object's position that it was at an altitude slightly below 250m and had a diameter of about twenty meters. Considering the sun's position, for the object to be illuminated, it would have needed to be at a minimum altitude of 312 km, which contradicts the lower altitude estimates.

Further analysis considered wind direction (weak wind from the South-South-West to South) and noted the object's movement perpendicular to the wind, ruling out a weather balloon hypothesis. The possibility of a plasma phenomenon was also considered, but the duration of the observation (nearly an hour) and the typical size of plasma (decimeters) made this unlikely. The article concludes that the most plausible explanation remains an Unidentified Flying Object (UFO).

Professor Pierre Huerin suggested that the witnesses might have underestimated the angular diameter because the object emitted ultraviolet light, with the visible light from the center being smaller than the photographed phenomenon. This could also explain the eye irritation.

Professor Pierre Guerin provided further remarks, stating that precise photometric analysis was impossible due to unknown camera settings and development conditions. He also cautioned that night photography can be misleading, with lights being mistaken for UFOs. However, if the witness is honest and the photos correspond to the visual observation, a halo and ultraviolet protrusions around the object could be invoked.

Another Observation in La Souterraine

The issue also reports on an earlier observation in La Souterraine made on September 2, 1969, by Solange Barthelot, who was working at the home of M. and Mme Picoty. While Barthelot was cooking, the young Picoty called her attention to a luminous object in the sky. She described it as small, smaller than a quarter of the Moon, but with a distinct shape and no halo. She could look at it without eye discomfort. The object remained stationary for about an hour to an hour and a half, changing color from yellow to red and then back to yellow, before becoming white. It then disappeared as if hidden by a cloud, despite the clear sky.

Similarities between the two La Souterraine observations include the date and location, and the description of the disappearance. However, Barthelot did not report eye irritation.

Confirmation and Analysis of Barthelot's Observation

M. Laguide visited Barthelot and saw her photographs, confirming a similarity in shape to the object he had seen. Young Pierre Picoty made detailed sketches of the object, which corresponded with Barthelot's description and a drawing made by M. Francis Consolin. Picoty described the object as "sparkling" and "orange," with a glow that faded towards the end of the observation. He confirmed there were no clouds, no Moon, and no visible stars at the time. He indicated the object's direction as Southwest with an elevation of about 60 degrees.

Picoty described the disappearance as a "cloud passing in front of the object," resulting in a decrease in luminosity, and the object "seemed to go out."

Robert Robuchon of CIESPI provided a summary of remarkable facts from the La Souterraine phenomenon, including an ascending curved movement, changes in azimuth, apparent immobility, a progressive decrease in size, and a poorly defined disappearance. He also noted the region's geological characteristics, including high-tension power lines and uranium deposits.

Additional UFO Reports

The issue includes brief reports on other UFO sightings:

1. Alès, France (June 18, 1970): A witness observed an unusual object in the sky that was brighter than a star and had a triangular shape.
2. Belgrade (July 12, 1970): An unidentified flying object was sighted moving silently from Northwest to Southeast at speeds between 400 and 600 km/h, described as having an ellipsoidal shape and emitting a flickering orange light. A pilot from the Yugoslavian Airline "YAT" stated it was neither a plane nor a satellite. The phenomenon was photographed.
3. Les Sables d'Olonne (August 1970): Jacques Le Bel, a former aeronautical navigator, reported observing a luminous object.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the detailed reporting of UFO sightings, the emphasis on witness testimony, and the attempt to apply scientific methods and analysis to these phenomena. The magazine appears to maintain an open but investigative stance, presenting various accounts and exploring potential explanations, from misidentification to more extraordinary possibilities. There is a clear effort to document and archive these events, with a focus on photographic evidence and the systematic collection of data, as seen with the adoption of the EDIS codification system. The editorial stance leans towards serious inquiry into unexplained aerial phenomena, encouraging further research and analysis.

This issue of "Engins Inconnus aux Sables d'Olonne" (Unknown Objects at Les Sables d'Olonne), published on July 6, 1970, by Science & Vie, delves into UFO sightings, theoretical propulsion systems, and critical analysis of ufological literature.

UFO Sightings

Les Sables d'Olonne Sighting (July 6, 1970)

The main cover story details an observation by L. Jacques LE BEL at Les Sables d'Olonne on July 6, 1970. At 23h12, he noticed a luminous point moving slowly from west to east, accompanied by two others. This group traversed the Lyra constellation between Deneb and Véga. Later, at 23h17, two more luminous points appeared, one moving slowly northeast, the other faster southwest. Two neighbors joined LE BEL to observe this phenomenon until 23h21. LE BEL ruled out shooting stars due to the slow movement and airplanes due to the lack of navigation lights. He proposed three possibilities: artificial satellites (unlikely for a group of six in such a short time), moving asteroids (velocities didn't match), or UFOs on an observation mission. The observation was cut short by cloud cover at 23h35. LE BEL emphasized his long-term familiarity with the night sky, asserting he could distinguish between a weather balloon and a planet. This report was transmitted by L. Guy TARADE of CEREIC.

Mysterious Craft Above Laxou (July 27, 1970)

Another report details an incident in Laxou (near Nancy) on July 27, 1970. Denis BOUR, on a professional obligation, observed a "rectangle" about nine times longer than wide, with a slightly curved shape, emitting a neon-like light. He alerted three colleagues, and all four witnessed the object moving in a straight line at a 60° angle above the horizon, without changing position or tilting. It moved from west to east. No details like windows or trails were noted. The object was silent, with sharp edges. Within 10 seconds, it disappeared below the horizon. BOUR estimated its length was equal to the apparent diameter of the full moon and stated it was flying quite high. The observation was made with the naked eye and caused no eye irritation. The witness is considered credible. This report was compiled by Francis SCHAEFER of GEOCNI. A similar object was reportedly seen on October 8, 1958, in Genval, Belgium.

Theoretical Propulsion Systems

Hypotheses on the Propulsion and Force Fields of UFOs

Raymond DECLERCK presents theoretical hypotheses on UFO propulsion. He acknowledges the immense difficulties in creating a convincing theory due to current physics limitations regarding matter and energy. DECLERCK seeks input from specialists and readers. He suggests that research into plasma interactions and magnetic fields, as well as phenomena on the Sun and stars, might hold the key to "interstellar cosmonautics." He proposes space-time manipulation as a potential propulsion method, citing the discovery of gravitationally collapsing stars and their spatio-temporal consequences. This theory aims to overcome the limitations of superluminal speeds, vast interstellar distances, and insufficient energy sources. He references Purcell's calculation that a journey to a star 12 light-years away at near light speed would require 400,000 tons of fuel, even with matter-antimatter annihilation.

DECLERCK also discusses the work of Oppenheimer, Volkoff, and Landau, who showed that even small masses can cause gravitational collapse if they exceed their critical radius, leading to extreme density and a transition to a "SUB-SPACE" that could be a universal link.

The "Inductive Ionic" Motor

This section explores revolutionary propulsion systems, including electronic-ionic and plasma propulsion, typically too weak for long-duration space travel. The proposed "Inductive Ionic Motor" for UFOs would use the external casing as the motor. Its principle involves magnetic repulsion from the ionized atmosphere, modulated by the ionizer field generated by the machine's magnetic hull. Rapid variations in ionization would cause the ionized air mass to behave like conductive coils in a magnetic flux, inducing currents. These currents would generate opposing magnetic fields, leading to repulsion and the projection of a high-temperature ionized air column. A circular ionization field could sweep a volume of air below, creating lift and propulsion. Asymmetry in the repulsive forces would direct the craft. The author notes that over 90% of the universe's matter exists as plasma, suggesting these craft might use particle currents or hydrogen clouds for propulsion, with the ionosphere being a prime environment.

Thermonuclear Phenomena

This section discusses the possibility of using radioactive emissions for propulsion, though modulation is difficult. It also touches upon plasma lasers for achieving high temperatures and ionization levels, leading to the plasma state. The text describes ultracentrifugation of plasma to create a vacuum, ejecting heavier particles and capturing hydrogen nuclei. Magnetic effects would stabilize the craft. Increased energy would trigger thermonuclear fusion, releasing immense energy explosively. The process could be enhanced by injecting deuterium or through proton-antiproton annihilation. The text briefly mentions the challenges of fusion confinement and the potential of "cold nuclear fusion" using muons, though their short lifespan and difficulty in creation are noted.

Unexplained Phenomena

Surprises at the North Pole?

This section reports on anomalies observed by the US satellite ESSA-7. A photograph from November 23, 1968, allegedly showed a gigantic, circular "orifice" at the North Pole. Similarly, ESSA-3 detected a "hole" at the North Pole on January 6, 1967. The South Pole showed no such symptoms. The CFRS maintains a reserved stance on these findings pending more precise information. A similar "black spot" was noted on Mars's polar cap by the Mariner probes.

Commentary on Television Scanning and Radar Images

L. Francis CONSOLIN, technical advisor for CFRS, comments on the potential explanation for the "North Pole hole" as a transmission error or a specific scanning method used by meteorological satellites. He suggests that if the image is genuinely centered on the North Pole, it represents a highly improbable coincidence.

Literary Critique and Ufology

"The Very Contestable 'Critique' (1) of Mr. GERALD MESSADIE" (Science & Vie No. 634, July 1970)

This article is a critique of a review by Gérald MESSADIE in "Science & Vie" concerning Henry DURRANT's book, "Le Livre Noir des Soucoupes Volantes" (The Black Book of Flying Saucers). The author of the critique, writing on behalf of the CERCLE FRANCAIS DE RECHERCHES SCIENTIFIQUES-CFRS, expresses strong disagreement with MESSADIE's dismissive approach.

MESSADIE's review, according to the critique, shows a lack of interest in UFO reports, attributing them to natural phenomena like ball lightning, commercial mystification, or pathological hallucination. He also states that no wreckage of these craft has been found to prove their existence. The critique argues that MESSADIE's approach is superficial and ignores the extensive work of prominent ufologists like Aimé MICHEL and Jacques VALLEE, whom MESSADIE dismisses as writing in a "feuilletonesque" style.

The critique highlights MESSADIE's dismissal of the book's photographic evidence, particularly a Maya bas-relief from Palenque, which MESSADIE suggests is irrelevant. The critique points out that "Science & Vie" itself has previously published articles supporting the reality of UFOs, citing a 1958 issue that presented Aimé MICHEL's findings positively. The critique accuses MESSADIE of being poorly informed, even about basic facts, such as the Soviet Union's alleged signals from Mars, which MESSADIE incorrectly states as fact.

The critique also questions MESSADIE's reliance on Jungian psychoanalysis to explain UFO phenomena, arguing it cannot account for physical traces left by landings. It concludes that MESSADIE's critique is superficial and lacks objectivity, urging "Science & Vie" to maintain its credibility by publishing this letter.

Letter to the Editor of "Science & Vie"

Francis SCHAEFER of CFRS writes to the Director of "Science & Vie" to denounce the "naïve critique" by Gérald MESSADIE of Henry DURRANT's book. SCHAEFER argues that MESSADIE's review is subjective and lacks scientific rigor. He points out that "Science & Vie" itself has previously shown interest in UFOs, citing a 1958 article that acknowledged Aimé MICHEL's evidence. SCHAEFER criticizes MESSADIE for ignoring prominent ufologists and scientists like James McDONALD, J.A. HYNEK, and David R. SAUNDERS. He also highlights MESSADIE's factual error regarding Soviet Mars missions. SCHAEFER questions MESSADIE's ability to judge ufological works without a basic understanding of astronautics and suggests that psychoanalysis cannot explain physical evidence like landing traces.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently explores the unexplained, particularly UFO phenomena, presenting witness accounts alongside theoretical scientific explanations and critical analyses. There's a clear stance in favor of serious investigation into UFOs, contrasting with what the authors perceive as dismissive or unscientific approaches in mainstream publications. The editorial tone is one of open inquiry, encouraging scientific rigor while acknowledging the extraordinary nature of the subject matter. The critique of MESSADIE's review underscores a commitment to defending the credibility of ufological research against what they deem unfair or uninformed criticism.

Title: Phénomènes Inconnus
Issue: No. 13
Volume: 2nd Year
Date: Third Quarter 1970
Publisher: Cercle Français de Recherches Scientifiques (CFAS)
Country: France
Language: French

This issue of "Phénomènes Inconnus" is a documentary and scientific review that serves as the official publication for the Cercle Français de Recherches Scientifiques (CFAS) and its associated research groups. It aims to disseminate information regarding Unidentified Flying Objects (UFOs) and mysterious civilizations.

Section 1: Astronautique-Astronomie

This section lists several French publications related to astronautics and astronomy:

• "Cosmos Club de France": A monthly publication from Paris, edited by Albert Ducrocq.
• "Espace" (formerly "Missiles"): A French astronautics review directed by J.C. Loreau, located in Paris.
• "Ciel et Espace": A liaison bulletin for amateur astronomy societies, directed by Pierre Bourge, with specimens available to readers of "Phénomènes Inconnus".

Section 2: Informations scientifiques

This section highlights scientific bulletins and studies:

• "Astrometro": A quarterly bulletin from the Association de Recherches Françaises d'Astrotrométéorologie (ARFA), directed by M. Jacques DuChatel in Pessac. Issue No. 55 includes studies on anticyclones, gravitation, and corpuscular waves.
• "AFIS": Published by the Agence Française d'Informations Scientifiques, located in Ivry sur Seine.

Section 3: Objets Volants Non Identifiés (OVNI)

This part lists journals and a book focused on UFOs:

• "FSR": An international journal devoted to the study of UFOs, edited by Charles Bowen, based in London.
• "UFO Commentary": Edited by Patrik Huyghe (USA).
• "Data-Net": Located in Mountain View, California.
• "Le Livre Noir des Soucoupes Volantes": A book by H. Durrant, published by Laffont (mentioned as a reminder).

Section 4: Civilisations mystérieuses

This section covers topics related to ancient or mysterious civilizations:

• "Vimana": An internal bulletin from CEREIC, edited by Guy Tarade in Nice. Specimens are available to readers of "P.I.".
• "Atlantis" (Incorporating Uranus): Edited by Egerton Sykes, published by Markham House Press LTD in Brighton.

Section 5: Divers

This section includes a miscellaneous publication:

• "Facettes" (Kiroir de la curiosité): A publication for the curious, covering history, language, religions, sciences, law, and curiosities. It includes historical anecdotes, bibliographies, and collections. Specimens cost 2 F.

Editorial Note

The editorial team notes that issue No. 13 of "Phénomènes Inconnus" has 30 pages and suggests that its content could appear in a printed review. As "P.I." is a non-profit publication, subscriptions are open to support their work and determine the progression of the bulletin. The issue is dated the third quarter of 1970, with F. Dilval listed as the Director of Publication.

Article: "A la Rotation d'un Astre à la Stabilité d'Orbite du Satellite ou de l'Anneau" by Pierre Salmon

This article, likely written between 1960 and 1965, discusses Saturn and its rings, incorporating more recent observations and artificial satellite data. It addresses the discovery of Saturn's tenth satellite, Janus, in 1969, near the Roche limit. The author highlights the work of astronomer Audouin Dollfus, who re-examined the cause of the Cassini Division. Previously, it was thought to be a tidal effect from satellites. Dollfus's more precise measurements in 1938 suggested that the period of a body at the Cassini Division's distance was half the period of the satellite Mimas, implying a connection. However, the article posits that neither Mimas nor Janus, with their small masses compared to Saturn, could have created the wide gap in the rings. The author proposes that objects within the Cassini Division are drawn towards Saturn, while those beyond move away, similar to how the Moon recedes from Earth.

The article draws parallels with artificial satellites of Earth, explaining that those below a certain synchronous orbit distance descend towards Earth, while those above move away. It suggests that the Cassini Division's cause is related to this principle of orbital dynamics. The author also touches upon the progressive recession of the Moon from Earth and the potential for Earth to have had its own Saturnian rings in the secondary era, which may have contributed to sedimentary layers and continental drift.

The article critiques scientists and journalists who adhere to relativistic theories without providing proof, suggesting that they ignore refutations of their established dogmas. It mentions the discovery of the acceleration of Mars's satellites Phobos and Deimos as evidence against current relativistic theories of gravity. The author concludes by suggesting that the Earth's sedimentary layer, being a poor conductor of heat, might be linked to continental expansion and the condensation of an outer ring into the Moon.

This article is an adaptation and reproduction by J. DuChatel, Secretary General of ARFA, and Pierre Salmon, honorary member of O.B.R.I.S.

Article: "UN PHÉNOMÈNE INCONNU ; la Radiesthésie, PERMET EN 1944 UNE TOUTE PREMIÈRE TRANSMISSION INTERPLANÉTAIRE."

This article details early experiments in interplanetary communication using radiesthesia, conducted by André Beaucôte in 1944. It draws a parallel between the deaths of two space pioneers in 1968 and Beaucôte, a French retiree who died at 79 after serving in WWI and being wounded multiple times.

Beaucôte kept a diary of his explorations and experiences between Earth and the Sun, sometimes beyond the Moon. The article suggests that few people knew about these events, which were considered "insolite" (unusual) and difficult to disseminate scientifically. The article lists individuals and organizations that were aware of Beaucôte's work, including the Confédération Française de la Radiesthesie, various radiesthesia societies, and scientific publications.

The core of the article describes Beaucôte's technique, which involved using a white paper with a circle, a stylus, and a pendulum over solar photographs to detect and map sunspots. His experiments, conducted over a week, indicated that Beaucôte could "see" into space. He was able to determine the Sun's rotation, the formation and extinction of sunspot groups, and even track a sunspot passing behind the Sun. These detections were possible even at night, when the Earth screen would normally obscure the view.

The article emphasizes the importance of having two people involved in such experiments – an operator and an astronomer – to eliminate autosuggestion. It recounts a specific test on May 19, 1955, where M. Lacarrière, a radiesthesist, was asked to describe the solar disk without prior knowledge. He succeeded in producing an accurate and instantaneous drawing of the solar disk in just five minutes, demonstrating a remarkable ability to perceive beyond the Sun, predating American Pioneer missions by over ten years.

The author concludes that this phenomenon, while unknown and unexplained, shows that the human brain is capable of tasks beyond those of electronic computers.

Organizations and Editorial Information

The issue lists various research groups and their affiliations:

• G.E.M.O.C. (Grenoble)
• G.E.O.C.N.I. (Freyming "57")
• C.E.R.E.I.C. (Nice)
• G.N.E.O.V.N.I. (Lille)
• O.B.R.I.S. (Bordeaux)
• C.I.E.S.P.I. (Poitiers)
• S.G.B. (Section GEMOC Belge du Hainaut)

The editorial committee includes Francis Schaefer (Editor-in-Chief), Pierre Delval (Director of Publication), Guy Tarade (Civilizations Studies), and technical advisors Louis Dubreucq and Francis Consolin. Redactors include Francis Grouset and Jean-Claude Baillon.

International correspondents are listed from Belgium, Luxembourg, Congo, Sarre, Canada, Spain, Portugal, and the Federal Republic of Germany.

Administrative services for the review and CFSR are managed by G.E.M.O.C. (General Direction), G.E.O.C.N.I. (Direction Administration), and M. J.-P. D'Hondt (General Secretariat of CFSR).

The bulletin's objectives are to share information on UFOs, inform the public about this subject, publish objective studies, and investigate enigmas of lost civilizations. These activities are non-profit.

The participation fee for the bulletin is 28 F for ordinary subscribers and 25 F for CFSR members. Payments and correspondence should be addressed to the Director of Publication, C.C.P. 6.963 00, Lyon.

A note states that any reproduction of documents or articles must be accompanied by the name and address of the bulletin and the author's name.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are astronomy, particularly the study of Saturn and its rings, and the investigation of Unidentified Flying Objects (UFOs). There is also a strong interest in mysterious civilizations and the potential for unconventional forms of communication, such as interplanetary transmission via radiesthesia. The editorial stance appears to be one of open inquiry into phenomena that challenge conventional scientific understanding, with a focus on documenting research and fostering a community of like-minded investigators. The publication emphasizes its non-profit nature and reliance on subscriber participation to continue its work.