Phenomenes Inconnus - No 11 - mars-avril 1970 - CFRS

Magazine Overview

Title: PHÉNOMÈNES inconnus
Issue: 11
Date: March - April 1970
Publisher: Cercle Français de Recherches Scientifiques (C.F.R.S.)
Content Focus: Unidentified Flying Objects (UFOs), mysterious civilizations, scientific research, space information, and related questions.

Editorial and Letters

Letter from the President of Honor

Louis DUBREUCQ, President d'Honneur of C.F.R.S., opens the issue by posing a question regarding Jean Sendy's article "Los O.V.N.I. et la Science officielle" (P.I. nº 10). DUBREUCQ critiques Sendy's categorical refusal to consider accumulated UFO testimonies as sincere and valid, particularly Sendy's assertion that advanced mathematical understanding should preclude the idea of bipeds surpassing us with superior science capable of breaking the sound barrier without a "BANG." DUBREUCQ argues that Sendy rejects theories like Captain Plantier's, viewing "mathematical orthodoxy" as an immutable axiom rather than a construct susceptible to modification. He notes Sendy's conviction that eminent scientists like Einstein have solved all physics problems and that Earth's mathematics are universally valid, leading to the conclusion that any extraterrestrial visitors must be bipeds. DUBREUCQ then presents a theoretical, historical, and technical overview of recent scientific work published in "Science et Vie," which he believes confirms Plantier's hypotheses and the École de Cambridge's findings. He cites the existence of gravitational waves, the Spin effect, laboratory antigravity, O.A.O.2. revelations about a non-curved and infinite universe, and work on exceeding the speed of light as forming a new scientific platform. This platform, he argues, is quasi-orthodox because it aligns with a considerable school of thought supported by experimentation and electronic recording. DUBREUCQ states his intention is to lay the groundwork for a scientific study circle, not merely to offer sterile criticism.

Subscription Information

An announcement reminds readers that a check in a box indicates their subscription is ending and encourages renewal. Subscription rates are listed: 28 F.F for ordinary subscriptions (30 F.F abroad), 25 F.F for members of C.F.R.S. sections, and 20 F.F for students. A free subscription (5 issues) is offered to anyone who procures two new subscribers by June.

Articles and Investigations

"UN OFFICIER DE POLICE EN ETAT D'HYPNOSE RAPPORTE SA RENCONTRE AVEC UNE MYSTERIEUSE ENTITE"

This article, extracted from "Flying Saucer Review" (July-August 1968) and compiled from texts in the N.I.C.A.P. bulletin "Ufo Investigator," details the case of Officer Schirmer. Pierre Delval (GEMOC) provides notes on the Schirmer affair, which was investigated by N.I.C.A.P. and the Condon Commission. The Condon Commission reportedly used hypnotic techniques on the witness, possibly to assess the method's effectiveness in gathering UFO information. However, the results of this specific investigation were not made public. The article suggests that while hypnosis might be a valid tool for scientific analysis and gathering information from contactees, its efficacy remains uncertain. The Colorado Project's use of hypnosis on Officer Schirmer implies that the information obtained was valuable, even if the Condon Committee's overall findings reportedly negated the reality of UFOs. The article speculates that the Condon Committee might have withheld information or that witnesses could be impostors, though the authors express skepticism about the latter, citing their own investigations in Valensole. The piece concludes that techniques like hypnosis are valuable for extracting maximum information from witnesses.

#### The Schirmer Case Details

On December 3, 1967, around 2:30 AM, Officer Schirmer of Ashland, Nebraska, encountered a brilliant aluminum-colored UFO hovering about 50 feet above the road. He observed red lights inside the object, estimated to be about 20 feet long. As his car approached within 40 feet, the lights flashed, and the UFO ascended rapidly, emitting a brief, high-pitched sound before disappearing straight up into the sky. Schirmer was later interviewed under hypnosis at the Colorado Project. During hypnosis sessions on February 14 and 15, he reportedly described an extraterrestrial being, a conversation with the "flying saucer" occupant, and a paralyzing ray. The hypnosis was conducted by Dr. Léo R. Sprinkle, a psychologist and N.I.C.A.P. member. The Colorado Project confirmed the use of hypnosis for gathering information, but the results were not publicly released. A police officer present during the sessions reportedly provided a detailed account to the "World Hérald" of Omaha. During the hypnosis, Schirmer described the object as stationary, hovering just above the road. He attempted to use his radio but was prevented by a beam of light emanating from the object. According to notes taken by the Chief of Police of Ashland, William Wlaschin, Schirmer's vehicle was illuminated, and a small, human-like figure (4-5 feet tall) emerged from beneath the craft, approached him, and communicated with him. Schirmer claimed there were other beings aboard who were not from known planets but from a neighboring galaxy with bases on Jupiter and Mars. He was told this was the first of three encounters he would have with them, with the next two expected before the end of 1968. Schirmer also stated the UFO operated on an anti-gravity system and drew electricity from a nearby line to emit a force field.

#### N.I.C.A.P.'s Perspective and Condon Committee Findings

The editor of "Ufo Investigator" notes that N.I.C.A.P. is conducting an in-depth investigation into the Schirmer case, hoping to obtain the full transcription of the hypnosis sessions, even though the Condon Project's conclusions were not to be revealed until the final public report by Dr. Condon. N.I.C.A.P. emphasizes its policy of authenticating every alleged contact before accepting it as factual, a cautious approach they have maintained for a long time. They acknowledge that while most alleged witnesses may be unstable, some "encounter" cases involve credible individuals who have seen extraterrestrial beings. However, they caution that misinterpretations, even if made in good faith, are possible. N.I.C.A.P. believes that distinctions should be made between "encounters" and the majority of unacceptable "contact" narratives. Hervé MATTE adds supplementary notes, stating that the Schirmer affair has seen new developments. He points out that the Condon Committee's report curiously presented incomplete results, omitting Schirmer's hypnotic statements. The final report stated that the hypnotic test aimed to determine if hypnosis could provide inaccessible information about UFOs. While Schirmer provided new details, the authenticity of the experience could not be established. Dr. Sprinkle opined that Schirmer was convinced of the reality of the events he described. The Condon Project's conclusion was that psychological evaluations, lack of proof, and interviews provided no assurance of the physical reality of the reported experience. For further details, readers are directed to "Scientific Study of Unidentified Flying Objects," case 52, pages 389-391. Dr. R. Léo Sprinkle, in an article "Some Uses of Hypnoses in Ufo Research," suggests the case warrants further investigation. The Schirmer case is noted as not being the first to be "enriched" by hypnosis, referencing the famous Hill couple case and the "Doctor X" and N.C. cases.

"L'AFFAIRE DU 24 AOUT ET SES PROLONGEMENTS"

This report by François TASEI, Secretary of OBRIS CVNI, summarizes investigations by the Aquitaine Section of C.F.R.S. into the events of the night of August 24, 1969. The report focuses on witness testimonies and the deduced trajectory of a UFO.

#### Key Observations and Trajectory

1. Witness Locations: Witnesses LANDAIS, FOURNET, and PUIRAVEAU were situated on a line oriented NNE-SSO, aligning with the object's trajectory.
2. Object Description: The object, described as a powerful white light, was stationary above the airport from 9:10 PM to 9:20 PM. It then moved SSO, passing over Sergeant FOURNET at 9:10 PM and Messieurs PUIRAVEAU (father and son) at 9:15 PM. These witnesses provided precise and consistent details, describing the moving UFO as a dark, ovoid mass with two "yellow headlights" at the front and pulsating violet-red lights underneath. It moved slowly, appearing unstable, like a "falling leaf." The round "headlights" or "portholes" could reportedly dim, seemingly hidden by the object's underside as it passed.
3. Aerial Corridor: Extending the trajectory NNE over 33 km passes near St-AEDARD and EYSINES, then over BAYON and BEC d'ALBES. This suggests that the aerial corridor previously determined in 1969 (BAYON-LE TRONQUET) was too approximate, and a new corridor, BAYON-LAVIGNOLLE (60 km), should be considered.
4. Return Pattern: The UFO returned after 137 days, following a pattern of observation intervals: 123, 109, 124, and 137 days.
5. Extended Trajectory: Extending the BAYON-LAVIGNOLLE corridor NNE and SSO reveals further observations:
* NNE: Over 500 km away, near WAMBEZ (OISE), an object identical to the one in LERIGNAC (white light stationary, red lights, and two yellow headlights in flight) was observed on October 11, 1969, at 6:15 AM. Similar orange spherical objects were previously seen over WAMBEZ. The object on the ground reportedly disappeared towards the NNE.
* SSO: Over 100 km away, numerous similar UFO observations date back to the night of August 24. The movement direction was observed as NE-SO, then SO-NE. The area west of DAX, where the August 24 trajectory and the BA-VIC line intersect, seems to be frequented by "dark, ovoid UFOs with two yellow headlights" since August 24, continuing for two months. The WAMBEZ landing in October is noted as significant.
6. Additional Gironde Testimonies: Three testimonies from Gironde do not fit the main corridor:
* Madame MORINIERE (HUME) saw a large red-orange "Echo" moving from East to South at 9:15 PM, then reversing direction.
* Monsieur and Madame FRAIN (ARCACHON) observed points of light in a triangle formation moving regularly across their vision for about twenty seconds, with a displacement from Southeast to Northwest.

#### Provisional Conclusion

The report concludes that it is necessary to gather maximum testimonies concerning the night of August 24, DAX observations, similar UFOs, and the localities crossed by the trajectory. The Aquitaine section of C.F.R.S. will strive to obtain more information, and if the events prove to have global significance, OBRIS-OVNI will publish its full dossiers.

"LIGNES ORTHOTENIQUES ET COULOIRS AERIENS" by Pierre DELVAL (GEMOC)

This section, authored by Pierre DELVAL, builds upon the work of the Aquitaine section of CFRS. It confirms that the objects observed over MERIGNAC, LAVIGNOLLE, and DAX are of the same type. Delval notes a striking resemblance to an object reported in WAMBEZ (detailed in a report by M. Chartier), which led to the identification of a frequently used "corridor" by these UFOs. This corridor aligns with previous findings and is clearly explained in François TASEI's report. Delval references a 1969 article in "P.I." nº 7 by Francis Schaefer on "aerial corridors," highlighting the work of Belgian researchers who have studied UFOs for about thirty years. Delval was surprised to find that the DAX-WAMBEZ (III) corridor extended further and coincided with a corridor traced by Belgian correspondents six years prior. He states that plotting the DAX-WAMBEZ trajectory and the Belgian corridor on a map reveals a perfect convergence. He refers to the "PODEN" corridor (Poperinge-LeenwaarDEN, Holland), which was previously noted in "P.I." nº 7 as heading towards Fatima, passing through WAMBEZ and DAX. This trajectory is described by Belgian "Ufologists" as a "certain corridor" identified by Dutch and Brussels researchers.

#### Orthotenic Lines and Aerial Corridors

Delval explains that the "BRUTUS" corridor (II) is a continuation of the "ATHUS" corridor identified by Belgian investigators. From ATHUS, six itineraries originate. He notes that on April 15, 1964, a large fluorescent elliptical object was observed stationary between ATHUS and Rodange (Luxembourg), and again on September 27 of the same year (Rixeim). Similar observations occurred in the same location in 1965-1966-1967. This suggests ATHUS is a permanent convergence point for several European and possibly circum-terrestrial axes. He also mentions that if the "BRUTUS" corridor were extended, it would pass over the poles, and the orthotenic line "BAVIC" would cross points in Argentina frequented by UFOs, such as Mendoza and Talca.

#### Collaboration and Future Research

Delval emphasizes that this observational work was made possible by the collaboration between Belgian and French organizations. He praises the initiative taken in 1969 to create the C.F.R.S., recognizing the value of localized work that has become fruitful. The exchange of information and coordination of local research efforts under this umbrella are expected to provide clearer direction for private investigation sections.

Maps and Diagrams

Map of Gironde UFO Sightings

A map illustrates the "LA NUIT DU 24 AOUT - EN GIRONDE" (The Night of August 24 - In Gironde) with numbered points indicating witness locations and times: M. Landais (21h), M. Fournet (21h10), M. Puiraveau (21h15), Mme Porinière (22h15), Mme Arbaudy (22h), and Mme Frain (C.30/25.8). The map also shows "Nouveau couloir" (New corridor) and "Ancien couloir" (Old corridor), the "Direction d'apparition des OVNIS" (Direction of UFO appearance), and key locations like Bordeaux, Mérignac Airport, and Arcachon.

UFO Types Observed Along the DAX-WAMBEZ Axis

Diagrams show different UFO shapes observed: two circular objects for MERIGNAC, two oval objects for LAVIGNOLLE, and oval objects with lights for DAX and WAMBEZ.

Legends and Maps

• Carte rep. A (Map Ref. A):
• (I) BAVIC (Bayonne-Vichy): Lists locations: Bayonne, Lencouacq, Tulle, Ussel, Selles, Vichy. "BAVIC" is described as an orthotenic alignment from Aimé Michel's 1954 map.
• (II) BRUTUS (Bruxelles-Athus): Lists locations: Athus, Namur, Rosières, Bruxelles, tome, Loyeuvre, Metz, St. Dié, Emos, Bâle. "BRUTUS" is described as an "aerial corridor."
• (III) Nouvel axe DAX - WAMBEZ (New DAX-WAMBEZ axis): Lists locations: Dax, Mérignac, Lavignolle, Wambez.

Carte rep. B (Map Ref. B): This map appears to show the "BRUTUS" aerial corridor originating from Athus and extending through various European locations, with numbered points likely representing sightings or convergence points.

"Objets volants non identifiés sur Bordeaux" (Unidentified Flying Objects over Bordeaux): A notice announces a conference and debate by the Aquitaine section of the Cercle français de recherches scientifiques on November 23rd at the Maison des jeunes du Grand Parc. The conference will address the ongoing problem of UFOs, with a focus on the periodic return of unknown craft over a specific sector of the Bordeaux region since 1965. O.B.R.I.S.-O.Y.N.I. aims for a rational study of these phenomena and will present research results to the public. A debate will follow the conference.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue of "PHÉNOMÈNES inconnus" strongly emphasizes the scientific investigation of UFO phenomena. It highlights the use of rigorous methods, including hypnosis (with caveats about its reliability), and the analysis of witness testimonies and geographical data to identify patterns like aerial corridors and orthotenic lines. The magazine promotes a collaborative approach, involving various research groups and international cooperation (e.g., with Belgian researchers). There is a clear stance against dismissing witness accounts outright, while also advocating for critical evaluation and the need for empirical evidence. The editorial stance leans towards a serious, scientific inquiry into UFOs, moving beyond mere speculation towards a more structured understanding of the phenomenon. The use of technical terms and detailed case studies underscores this scientific approach. The magazine also touches upon the limitations of official scientific bodies (like the Condon Committee) and the potential for suppressed information or alternative interpretations of findings.

This issue of the magazine presents an in-depth analysis of a UFO (Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon - UAP) observation, focusing on the investigative methodology employed. The primary article, "ANALYSE D'UNE OBSERVATION," details an event that occurred in August 1965, investigated by M. Francis Consolin of GEMOC.

Avant-Propos: The Importance of Methodology

Consolin begins by stating the importance of publishing this report, which concerns a "green fireball" observed over central France in August 1965. He emphasizes that the core value of the study lies in its methodology. The investigator stresses that the first step in any such inquiry should be to attempt to explain the phenomenon using known factors. He warns against the common tendency for investigators to seek to "prove" an extraterrestrial hypothesis by multiplying observations, often leading to inaccurate identifications. Instead, the focus should be on eliminating all observations with even the slightest doubt, and, as in this case, attempting a rational explanation of the phenomenon. This is framed as a matter of method.

The Observation of August 16, 1965

The specific observation took place on August 16, 1965, involving witnesses M. and Mme Consolin at Châteauneuf-les-Bains (Puy de Dôme), between 21:30 and 21:45. The sky was clear with the Milky Way visible. The moon was low on the horizon, and by 22:30, mist was expected to cover parts of the sky.

Description by M. Francis Consolin

Consolin, who was also a witness, recounts that he and his wife were observing a polar satellite (likely ECHO II) when they decided to walk towards a plateau to watch for shooting stars. Suddenly, the landscape was illuminated by a bright flash, described as being brighter than lightning, but without thunder. He then saw a blinding, white-greenish ball, followed by a filamentary orange trail. The object disappeared behind a hill, but the trail persisted for about a minute, resembling the Milky Way in appearance and intensity.

Aspect of the Phenomenon

• Ball: Described as a dazzling disc, with an apparent diameter about a quarter of that of the full moon. Consolin notes that bright point sources at night can appear non-punctual due to diffusion and diffraction within the eye, creating an image like a daisy.
• Trail: Both witnesses saw a residual trail that began where the object had "lit up." Consolin initially thought it might be a green meteorite from the Perseids shower, recalling similar reports from New Mexico about "green fireballs" a decade prior. This initial interpretation led him to neglect precise timekeeping and coordinate recording.
• Duration: Estimated between 0.5 and 1 second.
• Trajectory Inclination: Estimated between 10 and 15 degrees from the vertical, coming from the left.

Coordinates

Using a compass and measurements taken from the path's tree line, the observation point was precisely located. The bearing was determined to be 120 grades + 2 grades (1080). The altitude of the appearance point was estimated at an angle of 1/5, approximately 11 degrees above the horizontal. The point of occultation behind the hill was estimated at about 8 degrees. The apparent length of the trail was about two finger-widths at arm's length. The direction of appearance, when plotted on a map, passed slightly north of Thiers and Noiretable, aligning with the constellation Aquarius and extending towards the constellation Cygnus.

Analysis of the Phenomenon

Consolin analyzes the trajectory, noting it was not consistent with the radiant of Perseus. He suggests it might have originated from the Cygnides meteor shower. He then discusses the phenomenon further, noting that on August 20th, regional newspaper "La Montagne" reported numerous sightings, indicating it was a widespread event. He cross-referenced witness testimonies, including one from M. Salze, and found discrepancies between observations from different locations (e.g., Corent and Châteauneuf-les-Bains), suggesting multiple objects or a complex trajectory.

Possible Explanations

Consolin outlines four possible explanations:

• a) Extraterrestrial Origin (Meteorite): An object entering the atmosphere.
• b) Terrestrial Origin (Satellized Object): A man-made object re-entering the atmosphere.
• c) Aircraft-Launched Firework: A flare or similar device.
• d) M.O.C. (Mysterious Celestial Object): An unknown phenomenon.

#### Solution a) & b) - Re-entry Hypotheses

Analyzing the trajectory from Châteauneuf, the object moved in a plane (AD, AD2). It was unclear if it was approaching or receding. If it was approaching, its speed could be between 12 and 60 km/second. If it was a re-entering satellite, it would begin to decelerate around 140 km altitude, creating a luminous shockwave. The energy radiated in one second was calculated to be immense (3,700 billion kilowatts), leading Consolin to dismiss these hypotheses as unlikely, especially when compared to the energy released by an atomic bomb.

#### Solution c) - Firework Hypothesis

A flare would leave a smoke trail, but this would disappear after the flare extinguished. Such flares are typically launched at altitudes up to 20 km and have curved trajectories. While the appearance point could align with Noiretable (150 km from Guéret), it seemed unlikely a firework would be visible from such a distance. Furthermore, the trail persisted after the main light disappeared, which is inconsistent with a simple flare.

#### Solution d) - Mysterious Celestial Object

This leaves the possibility of a mysterious celestial object.

Examination of Other Testimonies

The magazine then systematically examines testimonies from various locations in the Puy-de-Dôme and surrounding regions, noting directions, times, and descriptions. These include sightings from St-Pierre-la-Boulhonne, Corent, Chateaugay, Allanche, Ussel, Costaros, Lespinasse, Saint-Germain-Lembron, Saint-Sauveur-la-Sagne, and Châteauneuf-les-Bains. The descriptions often mention green or blue-green objects with luminous trails, moving at various directions and altitudes.

Consolin notes that the directions are incompatible with a single, rectilinear trajectory. He concludes that between 21:15 and 22:45, one or more objects with common characteristics (green color, luminous trail) flew at low altitude over central France, "lighting up" or "extinguishing" alternately. He draws a parallel with the "Green Fireballs" of New Mexico, suggesting the object was indeed a mysterious celestial object.

Information Section: Spatial Information

This section provides brief news items related to space exploration and astronomy:

• Aviation-Magazine: Reports on the re-entry of the BOREAS satellite, discoveries of new compounds on the moon (gold, silver, ruby, chrome-titanium, pyrosmangite).
• Paros-Normandie: Mentions Apollo 13's observation of a "brilliant large cross" in the Fra-Mauro crater region on the moon.
• Le Monde: Project for a French-USSR radiotelescope on the moon by 1972.
• Aurora: USA experiment with an ionic engine for spacecraft.
• Aviation-Magazine: Technical studies on sterilizing interplanetary craft, attenuating reactor noise, optical communication systems, and systems for converting human waste into air and water for spacecraft survival. L. Sedov (URSS) suggests plans for a manned mission to the moon. Existence of small, super-dense stars is noted.
• SAF: Detection of formyl aldehyde molecules in stellar environments, suggesting the possibility of organic compound formation throughout the universe.
• Paris-Presse: Pulsars are suggested to be extremely dense, small stars rotating at high speeds.
• Sciences et Avenir: Kuiper suggests Saturn's rings are composed of solidified ammonia. Six Saturnian satellites are also likely composed of it. Iron chloride in Venusian clouds. A fourth ring of Saturn discovered by Pierre Guerin. A new planet discovered by American astronomers, with a mass equivalent to Earth, orbiting a pulsar.

Civilisations Mystérieuses: The Nazca Lines

This section, authored by Robert Carras (CEREIC), discusses the enigmatic Nazca lines in Peru. These are described as strange drawings and pistes (lines) in a desert region, visible primarily from the sky. The lines are immense, often trapezoidal and perfectly rectilinear, extending over 50 km. They are described as furrows with raised edges made of rock blocks. The author questions their purpose, noting they lead nowhere, similar to runways. He references archaeologist Paul Kosos and R. Charroux, who observed that some lines converge on small hills with vague structures, possibly indicating important strategic points from a lost civilization.

Carras highlights the sheer scale of the Nazca drawings, including a spider that extends for 1 km and covers nearly 100 hectares. He posits that these designs are too large to be identified from the ground and were likely intended for observers in the air or from space. This leads to the hypothesis that they were created by a civilization that had conquered the air, or even space, and were intended as a message for intelligences of such a civilization.

The article concludes that the Nazca site strongly supports the hypothesis of extraterrestrial civilizations having colonized Earth, preparing it for a life that other planets in our solar system do not possess. The Nazca site is declared the number 1 enigma of our globe.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently adopts a critical and methodical approach to UAP phenomena, prioritizing rational explanations and rigorous investigation over sensationalism. The Consolin report exemplifies this by detailing the process of elimination and analysis of witness data. The inclusion of the Nazca lines article further broadens the scope to ancient mysteries, framing them within a context of advanced, possibly extraterrestrial, intelligence. The spatial information section reflects a keen interest in contemporary space exploration and astronomical discoveries, often linking them to broader questions about life beyond Earth and the nature of the universe.

Title: Phénomènes Inconnus
Issue: 11
Date: 2nd Quarter 1970
Publisher: Not explicitly stated, but associated with C.F.R.S. and various research groups.
Country: France
Language: French

Content Overview

This issue of "Phénomènes Inconnus" serves as a bulletin for the "CERCLE FRANCAIS DE RECHERCHES SCIENTIFIQUES-CFRS" and acts as a periodical for several associated study groups. It aims to connect isolated researchers and private groups interested in the UFO phenomenon on an international level.

Listed Organizations and Publications:

The magazine lists several UFO and astronomical research organizations:

• O.B.R.I.S. (Organisation Bordelaise de Recherches et Informations Scientifiques sur les O.V.N.I.): Based in Bordeaux, Aquitaine section of C.F.R.S., publishes "L'HYPOTHESE EXTRA-TERRESTRE" four times a year. Subscription details and contact information for the treasurer, Michel AUDOUIN, are provided.
• "UFO-CHRONOLOG": Edited by Joseph ERHARDT in NEWPORT NEWS, VA, USA. Specimens available upon request.
• "UFOARB": Edited by Patrick A. Huyghe in NEWPORT NEWS, VA, USA. A typed bulletin in English, about twenty pages long.
• "CIEL et ESPACE": A French-language publication, the national liaison organ for amateur astronomy societies. Directed by P. BOURGE. Subscription costs are listed, with specimens available for 3.00 F.
• "RECHERCHE SPATIALE": A monthly publication from the Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales (CNES). Subscription fees for France and abroad are provided, along with CCP details for Paris.
• "INTERPLANETARY NEWS": An English-language publication edited by Mike PARRY. Specimens are available to readers of "P.I.". Contact: Dave Wilcox.

Collaboration and Translation:

The publication is seeking translators for English and Spanish to translate important documents into French. Interested individuals are asked to write to "GEMOC" Service traductions.

Book Sales and Information:

An inquiry is made about who might be able to resell old issues of anticipation novels (the "Fleuve Noir" series by Jimmy Guieu). Contact is directed to GEOCNI.

Space Technology Courses:

Information is provided about Technology of Space Experiences courses organized annually by the C.N.R.S. in Brétigny and Aire-sur-l'Adour. These courses are intended for researchers, engineers, and students preparing for advanced degrees in astronomy, astrophysics, aeronomy, earth physics, and biology, to equip them with knowledge for space experiments. Contact information for the CNES Division of University Relations is given.

General Information and Correspondence:

Correspondence with "P.I." and the "C.F.R.S." requires a 40 centimes stamp. The bulletin's specimen costs 5 stamps of 40 centimes.

Publication Details:

"P.I." No. 11 has a legal deposit from the 2nd quarter of 1970. The Director of Publication is P. DELVAL.

Editorial and Group Structure

Page 2 details the structure and purpose of "Phénomènes Inconnus". It is described as the organ of the CERCLE FRANCAIS DE RECHERCHES SCIENTIFIQUES-CFRS and a periodical for several listed groups:

• Le Groupement d'Etude des Mystérieux Objets Célestes - G.E.M.O.C.
• Le Groupement d'Etude d'Objets Célestes Non Identifiés – G.E.O.C.N.I.
• Le Centre d'Etude et de Recherches d'Eléments Inconnus de Civilisations - C.E.R.E.I.C.
• La Commission d'Etudes des Phénomènes Célestes Non Identifiés - C.E.P.C.N.I. (of the Association Astronomique du Nord)

Editorial Committee:

• Editor-in-Chief: Francis SCHAEFFER (G.E.O.C.N.I.)
• Director of Publication: Pierre DELVAL (G.E.M.O.C.)
• Civilizations Studies: Guy TARADE (C.E.R.E.I.C.)
• Technical Advisors: Louis DUBREUCQ (C.E.P.C.N.I.) and Francis CONSOLIN (G.E.M.O.C.)

Principal Foreign Correspondents:

• J.Pierre DEGRACE (Belgium)
• Gusty METZDORFF (Luxembourg)
• Serge JADOT (Congo)
• Hans SCHWARTZ (Sarre)
• Norbert SPEHNER (Canada)
• BARGALLO CHAVES (Spain)

Aims of "Phénomènes Inconnus":

The publication aims to:

1. Inform the public about Unidentified Flying Objects (UFOs).
2. Educate and document individuals interested in seriously studying this often misunderstood subject.
3. Publish scientific studies and diverse research on UFOs.
4. Explore the enigmas of lost civilizations and related questions.

These activities are explicitly stated as non-lucrative.

Administration and Subscription:

General administration is handled by G.E.M.O.C. at 1, rue Saint-Exupéry, 38 GRENOBLE (Isère). The annual contribution for the bulletin's expenses is fixed at 28 French francs, payable to the Director of Publication. Specimens are sent upon receipt of 5 stamps.

Reproduction Note:

Any reproduction of documents or articles must include the name and address of the bulletin and the author's name.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The primary theme of this issue is the dissemination of information regarding UFOs and related scientific research. The editorial stance is one of serious investigation and documentation, aiming to educate the public and foster a deeper understanding of unexplained aerial phenomena. There is a clear emphasis on connecting researchers and providing a platform for their findings, while also encouraging international collaboration and the translation of research materials. The publication also touches upon broader themes of astronomy, space exploration, and even the study of ancient civilizations, suggesting a wide scope for inquiry within the UFO research community.