Phenomene OVNI - No 17 - juillet 1984

Magazine Overview

This issue of "le phénomène O.V.N.I." from CSERU, dated July 1984, is the 17th edition. The cover prominently displays the title "le phénomène O.V.N.I." and the organization's name, "Comité Savoyard d'études et de Recherches Ufologiques" (CSERU).

Table of Contents

The table of contents lists several articles and sections:

• Sommaire (Table of Contents), page 1
• CSERU INFOS, page 2
• "La légende des étrangers" - Commentary on Russian sightings, article by GOVBAREV in Pravda, pages 3-6
• "Les mystères d'Apollo XI" by Jean Sider, pages 7-10
• "Quasi atterrissage d'OVNI à Cognin" (Quasi UFO landing in Cognin), interview and drawing by the witness - Observation at St Thibaud de Couz, pages 11-14
• "Le doute est le commencement de la sagesse" (Doubt is the beginning of wisdom) by Jacques Pavy, pages 15-16
• Lu pour vous (Read for you)
• "L'hypothèse extra terrestre" (The extraterrestrial hypothesis) by Jean Jacques Walter, pages 17-18
• Naissance de l'AIHPA (Birth of AIHPA), pages 19-22
• Courrier (Mail): Response from Jacques Scornaux to Michel Picard, pages 23-26

A quote is included: ";;; et comme disait le poisson rouge : 'il doit bien y avoir un dieu, sinon qui changerait l'eau du bocal ?'"

The price of the issue is 10 francs, and the publication date is July 1984.

CSERU INFOS

This section, appearing on page 3, marks the 17th issue of the publication. It acknowledges the efforts of volunteer collaborators and states that any profits are reinvested into the revue and operational costs. The publication is printed in France. Nicolas Greslou is the Director of Publication, and Marcel Petit is the Editor-in-Chief. The CSERU is located at 266 quai Charles Ravet, 73000 CHAMBERY, with a phone number of (79) 33-43-85. Permanences are held on the 2nd and 4th Wednesdays from 6 PM to 7:30 PM at 7 rue Métropole, 73000 CHAMBERY. Subscription costs are 30 francs for 3 issues (35 francs abroad), and membership (cotisation) is 50 francs, which includes the subscription. Payments can be made by bank check to CSERU or by postal order. For strange observations or investigations, witnesses are urged to contact CSERU by mail or during permanences, or to reach out to investigation representatives Edmond Bogeat (Chignin, tel 35-26-93) or Marcel Petit (Aix-les-Bains, tel 35-31-78). Anonymity is guaranteed. CSERU is a member of the Fédération Française d'Ufologie (FFU). The legal deposit is July 1984.

La légende des étrangers (The Legend of Strangers)

This article, by V. Goubarev, references an article from "LA PRAVDA" dated March 2, 1980. It describes a sighting of a bright object in the sky over Lake Onega, which appeared to be a star but then descended, emitting a ray of light and later a white trail. The article notes that readers of "Pravda" from various cities have reported similar sightings and are seeking explanations. It points out that the terms "U.V.N.I." (OVNI) and "flying saucers" did not exist initially but emerged from popular press and were later adopted by foreign scientists, leading to terminological confusion. The article questions why scientists remain "imperturbable" regarding these phenomena, suggesting that scientific publications describe "anomalous atmospheric appearances." It cites astronomers like François Bode (1823) and V. Meyer (1909), who described luminous, fast-moving objects and phenomena that could be mistaken for meteors or insects. The article also mentions that scientists have analyzed hundreds of "mysterious cases," often attributing them to atmospheric optical effects or technical experiments like rocket launches, weather balloons, or satellite debris. However, it acknowledges that not all atmospheric apparitions are easily explained, citing the unknown nature of atmospheric phenomena and the debate surrounding ball lightning. It concludes by mentioning that groups analyzing atmospheric anomalies exist within the USSR Academy of Sciences, as well as in France (Toulouse) and the USA.

L'autorité de la science (The Authority of Science)

This section continues the discussion on scientific perspectives. A. Metanovski writes about a typed manuscript titled "Are We Alone in the World?" which claims confirmation of extraterrestrial visits with references to public and scientific administrations. He urges attention to this question to prevent credulous people from being alarmed by unfounded rumors. The text notes that in recent times, discussions about extraterrestrial visits and direct contacts have become common in cities. The article then presents the views of the Semeniouk couple from Kiev, who believe a response from the publication would put an end to these unfounded rumors. The text emphasizes the difficulty in refuting scientific authorities and scientific organizations' hypotheses, yet notes that "saucer" propagandists exploit people's credulity by distorting scientists' positions. It mentions that in 1978, the US President proposed resuming the study of the "extraterrestrial problem" to NASA, which declined, deeming it a waste of resources due to a lack of reliable physical data. The USSR Academy of Sciences reportedly has no observational facts of extraterrestrials or their craft, with the source of such hypotheses being the inability or refusal to provide a scientific explanation for unusual events. The article states that the falsification of science is harmful as it hinders the study of the surrounding world and the search for answers to the inexplicable. It then recounts an alleged UFO sighting over Australia, reported by Melbourne TV viewers, which was also noticed by a pilot and twelve police officers. The Director of the New Zealand Observatory, David Maybin, explained this as the planet Venus, photographed by radar navigators, and that it appeared to move at the same speed as a UFO when viewed from an aircraft. However, the "bourgeois press," seeking sensationalism, allegedly ignored these explanations, leading to new inventions about alien spacecraft.

Les Mystères d'Apollo XI (The Mysteries of Apollo XI)

This article by Jean Sider discusses persistent rumors and whispers surrounding UFO phenomena. It contrasts these with hoaxes that eventually fade away. The article touches upon alleged UFO crashes and the recovery of occupants by the American Air Force, noting that the "legend" was persistent enough for Leonard Stringfield to investigate. It highlights an extraordinary and "taboo" aspect of ufology that discomfits many researchers. The conquest of the Moon, particularly the Apollo missions, is presented as a subject of many improbable stories about what astronauts saw or discussed with Mission Control. The author suggests that many such allegations were driven by financial motives rather than public information. However, one rumor has persisted: an incident during the Apollo XI mission, which made Neil Armstrong the first man on the Moon. Michel Granger's book is cited, mentioning sources (some of questionable honesty) that speak of UFOs observed by American astronauts. The article critiques a specific claim by M. Grancher regarding craters and an antenna on the Apollo photo. It then discusses allegations from Sam Pepper in the Canadian "National Bulletin" (September 29, 1969), claiming to have knowledge of a conversation between Armstrong and Aldrin during their first lunar walk. This alleged conversation reportedly involved immense spacecraft, alien visitors, and intelligent activity beneath the lunar surface. However, Pepper provided no proof, and his article is described as bordering on mythomania. The article acknowledges that Armstrong, Aldrin, and Collins did admit to seeing a "curious object" following their capsule to the lunar surface, which then disappeared. Dr. Oberg of NASA reportedly explained this as a "Saturn B" booster tank, a claim the author finds similar to Dr. Condon's attempts to minimize incidents. The author stresses the need for caution when discussing such subjects but notes that the number of officially recognized anomalies in American space missions is significant, prompting suspicion about the explanations given by officials, which may be intended to conceal the truth. New, unofficial information has emerged, providing a "relative consistency" and suggesting that authorities may have deliberately hidden facts. This information comes from both the US, via Henry Gris of the "National Enquirer," and the USSR. The "National Enquirer" is noted for financing and organizing hypnotic regression sessions with UFO witnesses. Henry Gris reportedly established contacts with Soviet scientists interested in UFOs, leading to information about the "jellyfish-like" UFO observed in Petrozavodsk, Karelia, on the night of September 19-20, 1977. The article then introduces the allegations of Maurice Chatelain, a Franco-American who claims to be a former director of communications at NASA. Chatelain reportedly spoke of two UFOs landing near the Apollo XI Lunar Module. The article expresses hope that Chatelain, with his alleged contacts at NASA, would not make false claims. Regarding the UFO that allegedly followed the Apollo XI capsule, John Schuessler of MUFON reportedly confirmed the "filature" (following) and stated it was a foreign "apparatus," not a Saturn B tank. Leonard Stringfield also reportedly received confirmation of this UFO incident from a "scientist close to the US government." Dr. Fred Bell, a former NASA expert, allegedly stated that US astronauts were instructed to remain discreet about their space encounters with UFOs for national security reasons and that he had seen UFO photos taken by astronauts that were not publicly released. The article then shifts to Soviet sources, citing Vladimir Azhazha, a Moscow physicist, who claims to have obtained information in 1977 about two UFOs landing on the lunar surface shortly after the LEM landed. Azhazha alleges that Armstrong notified Mission Control on a secured frequency while Aldrin took photos. This secured communication is suggested as an explanation for "cut-offs" or "blanks" in normal communications. A second Soviet source, Alexandre Kazantzev, also reportedly confirmed this double UFO landing near the Apollo XI LEM. A third Soviet personality, Dr. Sergei Bozhich, described as an expert in Soviet space programs at Moscow University, also reportedly provided information on the same incident, suggesting the "rumor" is becoming stronger.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently explores the UFO phenomenon from various angles, including eyewitness accounts, scientific analysis, and historical cases. There is a clear interest in presenting alleged evidence of UFOs and extraterrestrial activity, particularly in the context of space exploration (Apollo missions) and Russian sightings. While acknowledging scientific explanations and skepticism, the publication also highlights unexplained phenomena and suggests that authorities may be withholding information. The editorial stance appears to be one of open inquiry into UFOs, with a leaning towards accepting the reality of unexplained aerial phenomena and potential extraterrestrial involvement, while also engaging with scientific discourse and debunking attempts.

This issue of "Phénomène OVNI" (UFO Phenomenon) features a collection of articles and reports related to ufology, historical research into unexplained phenomena, and theoretical discussions on extraterrestrial hypotheses. The magazine appears to be a French publication dedicated to the study of UFOs.

Article: Quasi atterrissage d'un OVNI à Cognin en 1975

This section details a personal account of a UFO sighting that occurred in Cognin, France, in October 1975. The witness, identified as Madame X, describes being woken up by a strange sensation and then observing a luminous, bell-shaped object in her bedroom window. She emphasizes the unique quality of the light, describing it as diffuse, sulfur-yellow, with sharp contours and a distinct consistency. The object did not emit rays and appeared to have a solid form. The witness recounts her initial feelings of wonder and then fear, her paralysis, and her attempt to mentally photograph the object. She notes that the object seemed to have a 'presence' in her room. Following the disappearance of the main object, four rose-orange lights were observed ascending a nearby mountain, which she felt were connected to the primary sighting and carried an 'elsewhere's spirit'.

Article: Observation à St Thibaud de Couz

This report describes a UFO sighting that took place on September 28, 1979, around 9 PM, between Saint Thibaud de Couz and Vimines, France. Two cars were involved, with Madame X and her daughter in the first, and Monsieur X and their second daughter in the second. While driving towards their villa, Madame X noticed a bright, orange, bell-shaped object in the upper left of her windshield. The object was estimated to be about fifty meters away. Her daughter and Monsieur X also observed it, though from a greater distance. The object was described as having a very distinct shape, being luminous, and orange in color, with a paler, more transparent trail that was dotted with three smaller balls. The observation lasted approximately ten seconds. The object then moved behind the house and ascended the mountain towards the Col de l'Epine. Madame X experienced a physical reaction of oppression and fear, leading her to close her windows more often afterward. The other witnesses felt less intense reactions.

Article: Le double point de vue de l'historien-ufologue

This article, by Gilbert Cornu, discusses the role of ufologists who focus on historical research. It highlights the work of two young researchers from the Paris region who dedicate significant time to archival research and updating files on UFO phenomena. Cornu praises their serious and anonymous work, suggesting they deserve encouragement.

Article: LA NAISSANCE D'UNE ASSOCIATION DE RECHERCHES HISTORIQUES

This piece announces the formation of a new association called "ASSOCIATION POUR L'INVESTIGATION HISTORIQUE DES PHENOMENES INSOLITES" (AIHPI). The association aims to bring together researchers who conduct historical investigations into UFOs and similar unexplained phenomena, covering the period from prehistory to the end of World War II. Membership requires proof of research work, and members are committed to sharing their findings with the association rather than keeping them private. The association's headquarters are located in Brunoy, France.

Article: L'HYPOTESE EXTRATERRESTRE

Written by Jean Jacques Walter, this article explores the extraterrestrial hypothesis concerning the origin of life and intelligence. It begins by acknowledging the existence of Earth-like planets and poses the question of whether life and thought inevitably arise under conducive conditions. The author discusses two approaches to understanding evolution: one based on fundamental mechanisms and another using external descriptive laws. Walter critiques Darwin's theory of evolution, suggesting it is more of a fairy tale than a scientific explanation. He raises points about mutation rates and natural selection, questioning how certain differences persist while others do not. He uses the example of termites and their digestive systems to illustrate how selection does not always eliminate less adapted organisms. The article concludes that our understanding of evolution's mechanisms is limited and that the extraterrestrial hypothesis warrants consideration.

Article: LE DOUTE EST LE COMMENCEMENT DE LA SAGESSE (ARISTOTE)

This article, presented as a letter to "ufologues with a small 'u'," delves into the nature of ufological inquiry and the importance of doubt. The author, J. Pavy, critiques the tendency to classify and categorize UFO testimonies without critical examination. He warns against the uncritical acceptance of parapsychology and the dangers of "delirious" contactees, suggesting that such individuals should be handled with care. Pavy shares an anecdote about a woman, Madame Z, who claimed to have had her organs removed to make way for 'energy.' He discusses the psychological aspects of such claims and the potential for misinterpretation. The author emphasizes that skepticism is a valuable tool in ufology and that true faith is based on experience, not just belief.

Rescue Report: Jean Claude Ladrat

This brief report details the rescue of Jean Claude Ladrat, who was attempting to cross the Atlantic in a homemade submersible saucer. He was found by a Spanish trawler between the Cape Verde Islands and Brazil. Ladrat was reportedly searching for boats that disappear in the Bermudas, which he believed were absorbed by magnetic fogs. His submersible was described as two meters high with a nine-meter circumference, built over fifteen years, and equipped with an eight-hour oxygen supply and a plant-based air renewal system.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue include detailed eyewitness accounts of UFO sightings, the challenges and methodologies of ufological research, the historical investigation of unexplained phenomena, and theoretical discussions about extraterrestrial life and evolution. The editorial stance appears to be one of encouraging serious, evidence-based research while also acknowledging the subjective and sometimes controversial nature of ufology. There is a clear emphasis on historical documentation and critical analysis, as evidenced by the formation of the AIHPI and the discussions on doubt and skepticism. The magazine also seems to serve as a platform for ufologists to share their work and for the CSERU to distribute publications.

This issue of PHENOMENE OVNI, Volume 3, Issue 15, dated 1858 (though the content discusses research from the 1970s-1980s), published by CSERU, is primarily in French. It focuses on the rigorous, archival-based research into ufology and engages in a debate about the scientific validity of the extraterrestrial hypothesis.

The Genesis of a Research Association

The issue begins by detailing the formation of a research association dedicated to historical ufology. This group, which emerged from research dating back to 1972-73, aims to systematically verify citations and references in existing ufology literature, which they find often contains numerous inaccuracies that harm the field. They also highlight the potential of overlooked library resources, having already discovered over five hundred unpublished documents. The association is open to specialists from various disciplines to foster a multidisciplinary approach. Their initial work was spurred by Henry Durrant's "Le Livre noir des Soucoupes Volantes" and Michel Bougard's "La chronique des OVNI," which underscored the need for verification.

A 17th Century Encounter

To illustrate their archival findings, the magazine presents a previously unpublished text from the "RELATIONS DES JESUITES DANS LA NOUVELLE FRANCE," Volume 3, page 34, dated 1858 (referencing an event from 1655). The text describes an encounter in Onnontague, a center of Iroquois culture, involving three French soldiers and a figure called Taronhiaonagui, described as a dwarf or demon who claimed to be the protector of the land and demanded a sacrifice. The historical context provided places this event in the "Nouvelle France" region, following the discoveries of Jacques Cartier and the founding of Quebec by Samuel Champlain, and highlights the interactions with the Iroquois people, particularly through Jesuit missionaries.

Debate on the Extraterrestrial Hypothesis (HET)

A significant portion of the issue is dedicated to a critical analysis and debate, primarily responding to an article by Michel Picard titled "Traité de ratologie." The author, Jacques Scornaux, defends the scientific approach to ufology and critiques Picard's tendency to label dissenting opinions as "ratology." Scornaux argues that intelligent debate, even with divergent views, is possible without animosity, citing the philosophical correspondence between Paul Miscaki and Vercors as an example. He also expresses his personal friendships with Michel Monnerie and Bertrand Méheust, despite potential differences in their views, emphasizing that personal relationships should not be affected by intellectual disagreements.

Scornaux addresses Picard's criticisms regarding the extraterrestrial hypothesis (HET). He contends that the HET does not require the universe to be teeming with life, only one other advanced civilization. He also cautions against treating the HET as an unassailable dogma, stressing that "H" stands for hypothesis. He criticizes Picard for misinterpreting scientific findings, particularly concerning the probability of extraterrestrial life, and for accusing others of lacking scientific rigor while exhibiting a similar bias himself.

Specifically, Scornaux refutes Picard's interpretation of Jean-Jacques Walter's hypotheses and Jacques Monod's work on the origin of life. He argues that Monod's theories on the rarity of extraterrestrial life are not outdated, as Picard suggests, and that scientific findings, such as the lack of detected amino acids in space at the time of a cited article, support a cautious approach. Scornaux also questions the Gnose de Princeton's authors, suggesting potential right-wing political leanings that might influence their views.

He concludes by stating that science is not meant to console the foolish or confirm pre-existing philosophical beliefs. He advocates for a balanced perspective, neither dismissing the possibility of extraterrestrial intelligences outright nor affirming their presence without evidence. He emphasizes that while UFOs might be manifestations of extraterrestrial intelligence, definitive proof is still lacking, and open-mindedness with intellectual rigor is essential.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the importance of meticulous historical research in ufology, the critical examination of scientific hypotheses, and the defense of open, yet rigorous, scientific debate. The editorial stance appears to favor a cautious, evidence-based approach to ufology, emphasizing the need for verification, interdisciplinary collaboration, and a critical evaluation of all hypotheses, including the extraterrestrial hypothesis, without succumbing to dogma or personal bias. The publication also highlights its reliance on volunteer efforts and financial support from its readership.