Phenomene OVNI - No 15 - 2e trim 1981

Magazine Overview

This issue of "le phénomène O.V.N.I" (The UFO Phenomenon), published by CSERU (Comité Savoyard d'études et de Recherches Ufologiques), is issue number 15, dated the second trimester of 1981. The ISSN is 0180-2011. The cover prominently features the title "le phénomène O.V.N.I" and the CSERU logo.

Table of Contents

The issue includes a detailed table of contents on page 1. Key articles include:

• "Les OVNI du PASSE, ou 'le double point de vue de l'historion-ufologue,' 6è partie" by Gilbert CORNU (pages 2-8).
• "L'Histoire du dirigeable aux Etats-Unis : les visionnaires, les précurseurs et les pionniers" by Jean SIDER (pages 9-12).
• "Tribune libre : Traité de Ratologie, 2è partie" by Michel PICARD (pages 13-21).
• "Courrier : lettre de Remy CHAUVIN" (pages 21-22).
• "Crashs d'OVNI et cadavres d'humanoides, 3è volet" by Jean SIDER (pages 23-29).
• "Point de vues : 'affairistes et sorciers'" by Jean Pierre PETIT (pages 30-32).
• "'Assiettes volantes' ou les OVNI on URSS (2è partie)" by Jean BASTIDE (pages 33-38).
• "C.S.E.R.U. Infos" (pages 39-40).

The issue also features a quote attributed to Bernard HEUVELMANS regarding skepticism and a note about interviews from Bugue in August 1981.

Article Summaries

Les OVNI du PASSE, ou "le double point de vue de l'historion-ufologue, 6è partie" by Gilbert CORNU (pages 2-8)

This installment delves into the core of the conflict between historians and ufologists, identifying it as a problem of "rationalism." Cornu distinguishes between "scientific rationalism," which he upholds as the basis for scientific inquiry, and "philosophical rationalism." The latter, he argues, can become aggressive, anti-religious, and even dogmatic, rejecting any knowledge not derived from reason alone. He criticizes this philosophical rationalism for its anthropocentrism and its tendency to dismiss phenomena that challenge human exceptionalism, such as UFOs or religious concepts. Cornu traces the historical roots of this resistance, noting that science has often battled against ingrained beliefs in magic and the miraculous. He asserts that confronting the UFO phenomenon is not merely a scientific problem but one of intellectual honesty. He posits that a truly scientific approach to UFOs requires meticulous observation of facts and a willingness to question established knowledge, rather than resorting to preconceived notions or a priori dismissals. Cornu emphasizes that the scientific method, with its emphasis on doubt, prudence, and justification, is the only reliable path to understanding the UFO phenomenon, even if it means demystifying it. He concludes by suggesting that the scientific study of UFOs could lead to significant advancements in science, potentially revealing new principles and technologies.

L'Histoire du dirigeable aux Etats-Unis : les visionnaires, les précurseurs et les pionniers by Jean SIDER (pages 9-10)

This article addresses the ongoing debate surrounding the 1897 UFO wave in the USA. Sider notes that while various theories exist, the problem remains unresolved. He then shifts focus to the history of dirigibles in the United States, explaining that French researchers were initially ahead of their American counterparts. Sider defines a dirigible as an aircraft lighter than air, equipped with propellers and a steering system, requiring a propulsion system powerful enough to overcome wind resistance. He states that according to historians and official organizations, the first true dirigible meeting this criterion appeared in the USA after 1900. The article then categorizes individuals involved in early aerial endeavors into "visionaries, dreamers, and swindlers." It highlights Salomon ANDREWS, who began his work in 1849 with balloons but claimed his devices were powered by "gravitation." Despite seeking military support and even contacting President Lincoln, Andrews' claims were met with skepticism. He later constructed a device called the "Aercon," described as having three cigars joined together, with a journalist falsely reporting it could travel at 160 km/h. Andrews later founded the "Aeronautical Navigation Company" and proposed a second Aercon design, but without a propulsion system. A test flight reportedly took place in New York in 1866.

"Assiettes volantes" ou les OVNI on URSS (2è partie) by Jean BASTIDE (pages 33-38)

This section, the second part of an article on UFOs in the USSR, is not fully detailed in the provided OCR text. However, it is listed in the table of contents, indicating a discussion of UFO sightings or phenomena within the Soviet Union.

C.S.E.R.U. Infos (pages 39-40)

This section likely contains news and updates from the Savoyard Committee for Ufological Studies and Research (CSERU).

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the scientific investigation of UFO phenomena, the historical context of such investigations, and the philosophical challenges posed by rationalism and skepticism. The editorial stance, as expressed through the articles and the notable quote by Bernard Heuvelmans, strongly advocates for a rigorous, evidence-based, and open-minded scientific approach to ufology. The publication appears to champion the idea that UFO research, when conducted scientifically, is not a regression into obscurantism but a potential catalyst for scientific progress. There is a clear distinction made between genuine scientific inquiry and what is perceived as dogmatic or anti-religious philosophical rationalism. The issue also highlights the difficulties faced by serious ufologists and researchers, suggesting that the field may become more specialized and potentially alienate those seeking sensationalism.

Notable Quote

"En Science, le scepticisme est la seule attitude acceptable. Mais ne pas confondre sceptique et incrédule ! Le sceptique étudie le dossier; l'incrédule le rejette sans l'étudier." - Bernard HEUVELMANS

FAQ

• Question: What is the main theme of this issue of 'le phénomène O.V.N.I'? Answer: This issue primarily explores the historical and scientific dimensions of UFO phenomena, contrasting rationalist approaches with the complexities of the subject.

• Question: Who is Gilbert Cornu and what is his contribution? Answer: Gilbert Cornu is an historian-ufologist who contributes a multi-part article discussing the historian's and ufologist's perspectives on UFOs and the role of rationalism.

• Question: What is the stance on scientific skepticism presented in the issue? Answer: The issue advocates for scientific skepticism as an acceptable attitude, distinguishing it from incredulity, and emphasizing the importance of studying evidence.

• Question: What historical context is discussed regarding flying machines? Answer: The issue touches upon the history of dirigibles in the USA, noting that truly motorized dirigibles meeting specific criteria appeared after 1900, and discusses early visionaries and inventors.

This issue of "Tribune Libre" (Issue 14, July 1981) is a French-language publication focusing on a blend of historical aviation, unexplained phenomena, and critical analysis of scientific and pseudoscientific theories. The magazine presents itself as a platform for free discussion and investigation.

Early Aviation Pioneers and Dirigible Experiments

The issue dedicates significant space to the early history of aviation, detailing the efforts and often unsuccessful ventures of various pioneers.

• Andrews: Described as an aeronaut whose ventures failed due to lack of funding, he was considered unserious.
• Peter Campbell: A jeweler from Brooklyn, he designed a cigar-shaped dirigible powered by muscle in 1888. He later lost a passenger, Hogan, who never returned, leading Campbell to abandon his dream.
• Frédérick Marriott: In 1866, he founded the "Aerial Steam Navigation Compagny" to support his steam-powered dirigible project, the "Avitor Home Jr." The dirigible, a small balloon without a passenger, featured two small wings and a propeller powered by a steam engine. It flew about a mile on July 2, 1869, near San Francisco. It was later destroyed in a 1906 fire. Marriott died in 1883.
• John H. Pennington: In 1850, he proposed a steam-powered dirigible called the "New Era," equipped with paddle wheels and a rudder. Notably, he proposed routing the boiler's chimney through the hydrogen envelope. He founded the "Steamship Aerial Company" and advertised a 70-meter-long airship for $10,000.
• E.J. Pennington: Described as an industrialist from Indiana, he had conceived various flying machine projects but never built them. In 1897, he claimed to be experimenting with three "airships" powered by electric motors, a claim that appears to be unsubstantiated and possibly a scam.
• Rufus Porter: In 1849, he flew a steam dirigible model in New York. He founded the "Aerial Navigation Company" in 1851, envisioning an 800-foot-long airship capable of carrying hundreds of passengers. However, he never completed the project and was ruined by the Civil War.
• Charles Ritchell: In 1878, he was the first to fly a dirigible powered by muscular force in Bridgeport, Connecticut. He built five such aircraft and continued this work until 1905, believing that contemporary engines were not powerful enough.
• Carl Myers: Starting in 1875 with his wife Carlotta, he launched weather balloons. In 1895, he made a short flight in a muscularly propelled dirigible from Brooklyn to Manhattan and continued this work until 1910.

The article also mentions other "flying pedalers" and notes that Ritchell, Myers, and Professor Barnard (in Tennessee) were likely the only true inventors who flew dirigibles during the 1897 airship wave.

The 1897 Airship Wave and "Phantom Airships"

The issue addresses the widespread sightings of "airships" in 1897, particularly in Illinois, Michigan, Iowa, and Wisconsin. The author, Jean SIDER, refutes the idea that these were "genius local inventors" who then disappeared. He also dismisses explanations attributing the wave to "socio-psychological" phenomena like collective hysteria. SIDER's research, based on contemporary press articles, suggests that the sightings were not caused by these factors and that the error of some researchers was relying on limited French-language accounts and excessive imagination.

He notes that a specialist found no mention of airship disappearances in 1897 and that historians like Morril Stickler and Henry Palmer found no evidence of position lights or projectors on the modest airships of that era. SIDER concludes that the multiple observations in the spring of 1897 could not have been caused by the few (doubtful) cases reported in French literature.

"Ratology" and Scientific Critique

A significant portion of the magazine is dedicated to a critique of "ratology," a term used by the author, Michel PICARD, to describe what he views as a reductionist and pseudoscientific approach, particularly in the work of Jean Giraud. The critique is framed within a discussion of J.J. Walter's book "Planètes Pensantes."

• Critique of Giraud's Arguments: Picard challenges Giraud's dismissal of the Extra-Terrestrial Hypothesis (H.E.T.) as unscientific, arguing that H.E.T. is a valid scientific hypothesis related to the broader study of astrophysics and the potential for extraterrestrial life.
• Dreams and Paradoxical Sleep: Giraud's views on dreams and paradoxical sleep are heavily criticized. Picard asserts that the scientific consensus, as established by neurophysiologists like Jouvet, is that dreaming occurs during paradoxical sleep (REM sleep). Giraud's claims are labeled as "ratological" and lacking scientific basis.
• Evolutionary Theory: The article engages with evolutionary theory, specifically Giraud's interpretation of the work of De Cayeux. Picard argues against Giraud's view of evolution as a series of dead ends, emphasizing the concept of "auto-acceleration" and "evolutionary relays." He cites research suggesting that human evolution is a continuous, accelerating process, with past hominid species having reached advanced stages of development.
• Critique of "New Philosophers": The author criticizes the "new philosophers" who emerged after May 1968, accusing them of ideological bias and a rejection of scientific evidence in favor of pre-conceived notions.
• The Nature of Evolution: The article posits that evolution is not entirely unpredictable and that scientists are observing a "diagnostic of imminence" pointing towards a drastic change or "sur-deceleration." This is linked to the hyperbolic growth of development, which is seen as unsustainable in the long term.
• Human Evolution and Mutation: The text discusses the idea that human evolution might lead to a radical mutation, a "relay" of history that transcends biological and historical finalities. This is presented as a potential future development, not a miracle, but a consequence of evolutionary processes.

FAQ Section

The magazine includes a Frequently Asked Questions section:

• Early Aviation Pioneers: Mentions Andrews, Peter Campbell, Marriott, Pennington, and Porter.
• 1897 Airship Wave: Discusses sightings and refutes explanations involving local inventors or hysteria.
• "Ratology": Defines it as a critical term for reductionist or pseudoscientific approaches, contrasting it with scientific findings.
• Evolutionary Theory: Explains the concepts of auto-acceleration and evolutionary relays in human development.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the historical exploration of early aviation and its challenges, the critical examination of unexplained phenomena like the 1897 airship sightings, and a strong defense of empirical scientific methodology against what the authors perceive as ideological or pseudoscientific interpretations. The editorial stance is clearly in favor of scientific rigor, historical accuracy, and a critical approach to claims that lack verifiable evidence. The magazine positions itself as a platform for "free discussion" but appears to advocate for a particular rationalist and scientific viewpoint, particularly in its critique of "ratology."

This issue of "Phénomène OVNI" (Phenomenon UFO), identified as issue number 16 and dated March 1981, is published by CSERU. The magazine delves into complex and often controversial aspects of ufology, with a particular focus on UFO crashes, alleged recovered humanoid bodies, and the scientific and psychological interpretations surrounding these phenomena. The content is primarily in French, with a confidence score of 4, indicating good legibility with some minor imperfections.

Analysis of "Planètes Pensantes" and Psychological Interpretations

The issue begins with a critique of JJ Walter's book "Planètes Pensantes" (Thinking Planets), suggesting its psychoanalytic section is superfluous but the overall exposition is valuable. The author argues that Walter's work addresses questions relevant to astrophyicsists and biologists, aligning with scientific discourse on SETI (Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence). However, it contrasts this with the more sensationalist "ratological" (likely a derogatory term for UFOlogists) interpretations found in other UFO publications. The author criticizes Giraud for his psychoanalytic approach to the case of Jan d'Aigure, accusing him of employing reductionist and sectarian methods.

The Case of Jan d'Aigure and Psychoanalysis

J. Giraud's critique of Jan d'Aigure, an author known for the "Affaire Antonia," is discussed. Giraud reportedly uses a psychoanalytic lens, referencing concepts like "psychic regression," "maternal uterine space," and "mental optical illusion." The author questions Giraud's methodology and motives, sarcastically suggesting that Giraud might see himself in d'Aigure.

Scientific Perspectives on Life's Origins

Professor Rémy Chauvin contributes a piece addressing the scientific debate on the origin of life. He refutes the idea that life's appearance is highly improbable, citing experiments like those by Stanley Miller, which demonstrated the formation of polypeptides from inorganic matter under simulated primordial conditions. Chauvin highlights that biogenesis is a well-established field, with ongoing research even producing self-dividing globules. He criticizes Giraud for outdated information and for not acknowledging the progress in biogenesis, particularly the role of RNA and the work of researchers like Temin.

UFO Crashes and Humanoid Recoveries: The Work of Leonard Stringfield

A significant portion of the magazine is dedicated to the research of Leonard Stringfield, an American ufologist who has investigated alleged UFO crash incidents and the recovery of humanoid bodies. Jean Sider, the author of this section, details Stringfield's efforts to gather firsthand testimonies.

"Hangar 18" and Cinematic Portrayals

The article mentions the film "Hangar 18," a fictional work about UFO crashes and alien recoveries, produced by "SUNN CLASSICS PICTURES." While acknowledging its potential, Sider compares it unfavorably to "Close Encounters of the Third Kind" in terms of budget and production quality. The film's plot involves astronauts encountering a UFO and authorities attempting to conceal the incident, with the narrative revolving around alleged humanoid bodies stored in "Hangar 18" at a USAF base.

Stringfield's Testimonies and Evidence

Stringfield has reportedly collected nineteen firsthand testimonies of UFO crashes or related phenomena, a significant increase from the five he had gathered over the previous twenty years. These testimonies are described as extraordinary, leading Stringfield to be cautious about their public release. The article notes that many of these witnesses hold high positions in government or private sectors and have backgrounds in the Air Force or intelligence agencies, suggesting their accounts are likely credible.

Photographic Evidence and Debunking Efforts

Several photographs, allegedly depicting humanoid bodies, are discussed. Eight such photos, obtained by Stringfield, are undergoing verification. One of these photos was published on the cover of "Ancient Astronauts" magazine in November 1977, claiming to show a "humanoide found in cryogenic suspension." The article suggests that this photo might have been a hoax or a misrepresentation, possibly intended to discredit Stringfield's work. Further analysis of some of these photos, including detailed examination of negatives, has reportedly confirmed their authenticity and age (around 30 years), with some experts identifying the bodies as resembling rhesus monkeys or small orangutans, possibly carbonized.

The "Enquirer" Photo and Military Involvement

Another photograph, published in "The Enquirer" of Cincinnati, allegedly shows a partially carbonized humanoid corpse. This photo was provided by Charles Wilhelm, a US ufologist and friend of Stringfield. Wilhelm claims the photo concerns a crash in July 1948 near Laredo, Texas, taken by a US Navy photographer. He warns of potential repercussions from government agencies for divulging such information. Wilhelm's source, a high-ranking military officer, reportedly stated that the creature was not of Earth origin. However, the article expresses skepticism, suggesting this might be a deliberate attempt at debunking.

UFO Report's Analysis and Counter-Arguments

The magazine "UFO Report" published an article in its February 1981 issue (accessible from December 1980) that analyzed two photos, including a second cliché not previously seen. This analysis, performed by William Spaulding of Ground Saucer Watch, reportedly confirmed the authenticity and age of the photos, but identified the subject as a carbonized rhesus monkey or small orangutan, approximately 85 cm tall. "UFO Report" concluded that the case was not a hoax but possibly a misinterpretation. The author of the "Phénomène OVNI" article suspects that this might be a staged operation by a government agency to discredit Stringfield's research.

Hypotheses on UFO Crash Information Dissemination

The article presents seven hypotheses to explain the dissemination of information regarding UFO crashes and alleged alien bodies:

1. False information for profit: Unlikely due to the difficulty of creating a "scoop" in this area.
2. True information, misinterpreted: Possible for some sightings, such as experimental aircraft or recovered animal subjects.
3. False information to discredit true events: Considered very possible and a "classic" psychological action by secret agents.
4. True information to test or accustom the public: Also considered a "classic" action, but less probable given the long history of UFO crash reports.
5. True information, altered to "kill" leaks: Possible, similar to hypothesis 3.
6. False information to divert public attention: Considered improbable, as UFO crash impacts are minimal and do not prevent media from exposing scandals.
7. True information to inform the public: Considered the simplest, most logical, and most plausible hypothesis.

The author concludes by eliminating hypotheses 1 and 6 (false information) and 4 (testing the public). Hypothesis 2 (misinterpretation) is considered plausible for a few cases, particularly photographic evidence. Hypotheses 3, 5, and 7 remain, suggesting that at least one authentic UFO crash and humanoid body recovery is likely real. The author emphasizes the necessity of investigating these claims to find material proof of UFO theories, stating that ignorance is worse than making mistakes.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue of "Phénomène OVNI" strongly advocates for the serious investigation of UFO phenomena, particularly crash incidents and alleged alien encounters. It exhibits a critical stance towards purely psychological or reductionist explanations, favoring empirical evidence and scientific analysis. The magazine appears to support the work of researchers like Leonard Stringfield who are seeking concrete proof. There is a clear undercurrent of suspicion towards government agencies and a belief that a cover-up or deliberate disinformation campaign may be in play to suppress the truth about UFOs. The editorial stance is one of persistent inquiry and a demand for transparency regarding these unexplained events.

This issue of "Point de Vues" (Issue 30) delves into the complex world of ufology, focusing on the distinction between genuine researchers and those who exploit public fascination with UFOs for personal gain. The magazine is published by CSERU and is in French.

Affairistes et Sorciers

The lead article, "AFFAIRISTES et SORCIERS," critically examines two types of individuals who capitalize on the public's interest in UFOs: the 'affairist' and the 'sorcerer.' The 'affairist' is portrayed as someone who sells illusions and unsubstantiated claims, often through lectures and fabricated stories, akin to historical showmen. The article criticizes their hollow discourse and the lucrative nature of their activities, which it suggests are a temporary exploitation of public demand. The 'sorcerer,' on the other hand, is described as working with less industrial methods, claiming to have messages or contact with extraterrestrials, often through more artisanal means.

The article contrasts these figures with genuine researchers, emphasizing the negative impact 'affairists' and 'sorcerers' have on the credibility of scientific research in the field. It highlights that while some contacts with extraterrestrials might be possible, the methods employed by these individuals are often deceptive.

UFO Sightings and Reports

The issue presents a series of UFO sightings and encounters, primarily from the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, spanning several decades:

Soviet Union and Eastern Europe

• October 1960, Berkh-Bysk, Russia: Engineer Youri M. Novikov witnessed a strange phenomenon involving a dark cloud emitting a luminous beam that formed a parachute-like shape. The object moved parallel to the ground.
• March 1964, Petropavlovsk, Russia: Reserve Air Force officer S.N. Popov observed two strange disks flying in formation, emitting a faint, vibrant violet-blue light. The objects were described as having a stable, circular shape with a luminous interior.
• July 1964, Bologoe, Russia: Lecturer Viatcheslav Zaitsev reported seeing a large disk emerge from under a TU-104 aircraft and then move away at high speed.
• July 26, 1965, Ogre, Latvia: Robert Vitolnick and others observed a brilliant 'star' that resolved into a lenticular disk approximately 100 meters wide, with a central sphere and three surrounding spheres that orbited it.
• September 24, 1965, Novoïe Afon, Russia: Astronomer-geodesist Loudmila Tsékhanovitch witnessed a disk making a dizzying dive over the Black Sea.
• Before 1967, Tiksi, Russia: A saucer with a small tower was observed from a TU-104 flying over Tiksi.
• June 17, 1966, Elista, Russia: Geophysical engineer V. Krylov and colleagues observed a disk descending in a helical trajectory.
• August 5, 1927, Mongolia: Nicolas Roerich and his expedition saw an eagle followed by a large, sun-reflecting cigar flying rapidly from north to south.
• 1914, Ratchine, Russia: A report from Alexandre Politschouk's grandfather described cigar-shaped objects flying at high speed, and a viscous substance falling from the sky.
• November 27, 1954, Moscow, Russia: Several people saw a cylinder flying northwest at an altitude of 200-300 meters, which then became vertical and ascended rapidly.
• Early February 1955, Moscow, Russia: Residents observed a flying cigar at high altitude that hovered and then disappeared.
• August 1964, Borovenki, Ukraine: Mikaïlo Oleinik reported seeing a cylindrical object three times larger than an airplane, flying from south to north at an altitude of about 1000 meters, emitting flames and moving at airplane speed.

"Porte-Soucoupes" (Saucer Carriers) of Space?

• 1977: Russian Pacific fleet sailors observed a gigantic cylinder from which several small objects emerged and flew out.
• 1977: Soldiers in Poutivl observed a gigantic cylinder, 300 meters long, hovering overhead, releasing smaller objects.

Unusual Shapes: Bulbs, Fish, and Cucumbers

• Khanty-Mansiysk, Russia: An observation of a gigantic "electric bulb" UFO was reported.
• Moscow, Russia (late 1948): Several sightings of "fish" or "cigar" shaped UFOs were reported.
• June 16, 1948, Kapoustin Yar, Russia: Test pilot Arkady Ivanovitch Apraksin encountered a "cucumber" shaped object emitting conical light beams. The object caused his aircraft's electrical systems and engine to fail, forcing an emergency landing.
• Spring 1949, Kapoustin Yar, Russia: Another pilot observed a similar elongated, dirigible-shaped object without beams.
• May 6, 1949, Volsk, Russia: Apraksin again encountered a "cucumber" shaped object that blinded him and caused his aircraft's electrical systems to fail, leading to a crash landing.

Croissants in the Sky

• September 19, 1967: Multiple sightings of luminous, croissant-shaped objects were reported across various locations in the Soviet Union, including near Donetsk, in the Svatovsky rayon, and by pilots and astronomers. These objects were described as having various colors (honey, blue-violet, orange) and behaviors, sometimes emitting sparks or jets.

Notes and References

The issue includes a detailed list of references (numbered 20-36) to various publications and sources, including "Skylook," "Spoutnik," "Phenomènes Spatioux," and reports from Soviet sources. It also mentions the publication of popular science comic books by Jean-Pierre Petit.

CSERU Information

The "EN VRAC" section provides updates from CSERU (Centre Soviétique d'Étude et de Recherche Ufologique). It thanks subscribers for their support and announces an increase in subscription fees due to rising postal costs. Back issues are available for purchase. It also details upcoming meetings of the CECRU (European Coordination Committee for Ufological Research) in Dijon and the activities of the FEDERATION FRANCAISE D'UFOLOGIE (FFU).

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the critical examination of the UFO phenomenon, the distinction between genuine research and exploitation, and the reporting of numerous UFO sightings, particularly from the Soviet bloc. The editorial stance is clearly critical of those who profit from the UFO topic without providing substantive evidence or research, while acknowledging the possibility of genuine phenomena and the importance of scientific investigation. The magazine aims to inform the public and maintain the credibility of ufological research.

This document is page 40 of a French publication, likely a magazine or newsletter, focusing on ufology. It details subscription and membership information, lists the administrative and regional personnel, and provides contact details for the organization.

Subscriptions and Memberships The publication offers several options for engagement: * Standard Subscription: 30 francs for 4 issues. * International Subscription: 35 francs. * Supporting Membership: 35 francs. * Subscription + Membership: 50 francs, which includes a membership card.

Composition of the Administrative Council The administrative council is detailed, with key figures and their roles: * President: Nicolas GRESLOU (responsible for inter-group relations, C.E.C.R.U., and secretary of the F.F.U.). * Vice-President: Jacques BOSSO (printer of the revue). * Technical Material Manager: Antoine BARTOLO. * Archivist and Treasurer: Serge CHAZOTTES. * Surveillance Evenings Manager: Marcel PETIT. * Investigation Service Managers: Charly BEC and Maurice DETRE.

Other council members include Edmond BOGEAT, Yves DARVEY, Jacques PAVY, Jean Marc DURBET, and Jean Paul CUA. Jean Louis DOUBET and Roland LEQUEUX are listed as substitutes. The document also remembers Pierre BOURBON and Jacques ROULET 'in memoriam'.

Regional Delegates Regional delegates are listed for information and to receive contributions: * MONTMELI AN: Antoine BARTOLO. * PONT DE BEAUVOISIN: François MIGNON. * AIX LES BAINS: Marcel PETIT and Charly BEC. * les BAUGES: Yves DARVEY. * GRENOBLE: Michel PICARD.

Headquarters and Correspondence The main office and correspondence address for CSERU is provided: * Address: C.S.E.R.U., 266 quai Charles Ravet, 73000 CHAMBERY. * Telephone: (79) 33-43-85.

Permanences Public meetings ('permanences') are held on the 2nd and 4th Wednesdays of each month, from 6:00 PM to 7:30 PM, at 7 rue Métropole, CHAMBERY.

Affiliations The CSERU is a member of: * The European Committee for Ufological Research Coordination (CECRU). * The French Federation of Ufology (FFU).

Call to Action Readers are encouraged to promote subscriptions around them, as the improvement of the revue depends on it. They are also asked not to discard the issue, as it could be useful to others.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance The document strongly emphasizes the organizational structure and operational details of the CSERU, a ufology research group. The editorial stance appears to be focused on promoting the organization, its publication, and encouraging active participation and support from its readership. The emphasis on subscriptions and membership suggests a non-profit or member-funded model, with a clear call for financial and promotional support to ensure the continued improvement and viability of their revue.