Pegasus - Vol 11 No 4

Magazine Overview

Title: PEGASUS
Issue: Volume 11, #4
Date: July 15, 2000
Publisher: Surrey Investigation Group on Aerial Phenomena (SIGAP)

Editorial and Content Summary

This issue of PEGASUS, published by the Surrey Investigation Group on Aerial Phenomena (SIGAP), explores the persistent and often disturbing nature of the UFO phenomenon, particularly focusing on abduction experiences and their historical parallels.

UFO Silence and Media Portrayal

The editorial, penned by G.M. (likely Gordon Millington, the Chairman), notes a conspicuous absence of UFO-related news in mainstream media, contrasting it with the continued activity observed online and in specialized journals. The editorial expresses concern that UFOs and extraterrestrials are increasingly relegated to fiction and advertising, often portrayed in a manner that trivializes or negates the reality of serious investigations. SIGAP emphasizes its role in providing members with information denied elsewhere and fostering community through its publication.

The Incubus Connection: Ancient Lore and Modern Abductions

A significant portion of the magazine, authored by 'Chive Mynde,' draws parallels between modern UFO abduction accounts, especially those involving sexual encounters, and ancient folklore concerning demons like the incubus and succubus. The article references historical texts and definitions, including Ambrose Bierce's 'The Devil's Dictionary,' to illustrate the long-standing nature of these phenomena. It suggests that the 'abduction stories form a continuum with old legends and beliefs,' and that 'the incubus and succubus of medieval times did the exact same things to their abductees as today's sexually-inclined aliens do to their abductees.'

Examples are provided of historical accounts of demonic visitations and sexual assaults, noting similarities in the physical descriptions of the entities and the experiences of the victims. The article highlights the concept of 'fairy bruising' and the 'Devil's mark' as ancient precursors to the physical evidence sometimes found on UFO abductees. It posits that the 'modern' aliens associated with sexual abductions can be categorized into greys, reptilian/grasshopper-like creatures, and Nordic-appearing beings, all of whom engage in sexual contact.

Historical Cases and Expert Opinions

The magazine presents several historical and contemporary cases to support its arguments:

• Karla Turner's Experience: The article recounts Karla Turner's experiences and her book, which details alien contact and sexual encounters. Her husband, Casey, experienced memories of alien contact, including sexual encounters and physical marks.
• Antonio Boas Sighting (1957): This case describes a farmer in Brazil who encountered a landed UFO and four aliens, experiencing a medical examination and a sexual encounter with a female alien.
• Shane Kurz Abduction (1968): Under hypnosis, teenager Shane Kurz recalled being abducted, subjected to examination, and a forced sexual act by a grey alien.
• Aileen Garoutte's Interviews: Director of UFO CCI, Aileen Garoutte, has interviewed abductees who claim sexual contact with aliens, including a couple abducted during a drive.
• Rick Rotter's Sexual Trauma Hypothesis: Rotter suggested that UFO abductees might be reliving childhood sexual abuse trauma, with the abduction experience serving as a psychological defense mechanism.
• Dr. Alvin Lawson's Birth Trauma Hypothesis: Lawson proposed that abductees might be reliving the trauma of birth.

Government Secrecy and Law Enforcement Involvement

Several sections address the perceived government cover-up and the role of law enforcement in UFO reporting:

• Citizens Against UFO Secrecy (CAUS) Lawsuit: The magazine reports on a lawsuit filed by CAUS against the Department of Defense, alleging bad faith in the search for information about a triangular aerial object. The judge reserved a decision on the government's motion to dismiss.
• Ohio Police Departments and UFOs: The article details the reluctance of Ohio police departments to associate with UFO reports, citing George Clappison's research suggesting that calls are often forwarded to secret offices at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base (WPAFB). Instances of police officers witnessing UFOs and encountering official stonewalling are highlighted, including the Trumbull County disturbance and the Lebanon Correctional Institute incident.
• The Trumbull County Disturbance (1994): This case describes a late-night pursuit of a 'red, saucer shaped object' by multiple police departments in Ohio. The object reportedly caused electrical failures and evaded identification by various agencies, including NASA and the Air Force.
• Portage County Incident (1966): A historical account of a UFO chase involving police officers in Ohio, which ended with the object disappearing and the official explanation being the planet Venus.

Paranormal Experiences and Psychological Impact

Brent Raynes' survey on UFO experiences is cited, indicating that individuals with UFO encounters also report a high incidence of other paranormal experiences, such as psychic phenomena, telepathy, precognition, and out-of-body experiences. The survey also suggested a cluster of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) findings among abductees, though the article notes that childhood sexual abuse is not necessarily the cause of PTSD symptoms in all cases.

Scientific Discoveries

A brief section reports on the discovery of six new extrasolar planets by a team of astronomers, including Steven Vogt and Geoff Marcy. While some planets are in habitable zones, their eccentric orbits suggest that our solar system's near-circular orbits might be rare.

Notable Anecdote

The issue includes the story behind Neil Armstrong's enigmatic remark "Good luck, Mr. Gorsky," revealing it to be a childhood anecdote about a neighbor's wife.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the persistent nature of anomalous aerial phenomena, the deep historical roots of abduction experiences that predate the modern UFO era, and the perceived lack of transparency and active suppression of information by governmental and media institutions. The editorial stance appears to be one of critical inquiry, urging readers to consider the historical context of UFO sightings and abductions and to question official narratives. There is a strong emphasis on the idea that what is currently labeled as 'UFO phenomena' may be a manifestation of something ancient and archetypal, rather than solely extraterrestrial spacecraft.

This document is an excerpt from issue 30 of a magazine, focusing on a UFO incident that occurred in Trumbull County, Ohio, on December 14, 1994. The article details the writer's attempts to gather information from official sources and highlights the alleged cover-up and denials surrounding the event.

Youngstown FAA and Air Force Base Inquiries The writer's initial inquiries to the Youngstown FAA control tower revealed that no current employees on duty would have been employed during the time of the incident. A spokesperson stated that all personnel were hired after the date in question and that no one presently employed had knowledge of the event. A subsequent inquiry, placed in writing through the Freedom of Information Act to the Youngstown-Warren Regional Airport FAA Air Traffic Control Tower, was deferred to the Great Lakes Regional Air Traffic Division.

When the writer contacted the Youngstown Air Force Base public information officer in May 1996 regarding the UFO pursuit, the officer laughed and stated that nothing like that had ever happened and that the information was "COMPLETELY BOGUS."

True Censorship and Media Blackout The article claims that the UFO disturbance over Trumbull County was "strangely blacked-out" by the involved departments, with no notification to the news media and no press reportage. It is revealed that a news reporter from Channel 33 in Youngstown was aware of the incident and had received a call from a distressed resident. However, the citizenry was never apprised.

An unnamed police official, when interviewed after a traffic accident, complained that the news media should have shown the same interest in the UFO event as they did in the accident, to which the reporter reportedly laughed.

Witness Accounts and Evidence The Trumbull County disturbance is described as a "volatile mystery." The article highlights heated denials from the Youngstown Air Base public relations officer, who claimed the event "never happened to begin with." Conversely, an FAA tower operator stated that "nothing could be visually observed," while a security guard outside the facility, accompanied by a Howland Township police officer, reportedly watched the UFO. At one point, a second object was seen "over the airbase."

The disruption of the electronic instrumentation of a Liberty Township patrol cruiser is presented as "viable evidence" that should warrant more attention. The case is described as having numerous witnesses, including police officials, who reported a "massive, rotating saucer-shaped red light." This is contrasted with later Air Force denials, suggesting a conspiracy.

Article Revision and Context This article was originally prepared in June 1996 and updated in June 1998. The revision was prompted by the acquisition of audio dispatch tapes of 9-1-1 correspondence from the Trumbull County Sheriff's Department. This allowed for the precise date of the event to be determined. The article clarifies that the incident occurred in December, not in the timeframe of the Pittsburgh jetliner calamity in September 1994, and is not known to be correlated with that tragedy.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance The recurring themes in this article are government secrecy, official denial of UFO phenomena, witness testimony (including law enforcement), and the potential for a cover-up. The editorial stance appears to be one that supports the reality of the UFO event and criticizes the lack of transparency and the dismissive attitude of official sources. The article advocates for the case to receive wider attention and investigation, suggesting that skeptical communities and debunkers would find it a compelling case.